1
|
Gartner U, Armstrong MR, Sharma SK, Jones JT, Blok VC, Hein I, Bryan GJ. Characterisation and mapping of a Globodera pallida resistance derived from the wild potato species Solanum spegazzinii. TAG. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS. THEORETISCHE UND ANGEWANDTE GENETIK 2024; 137:106. [PMID: 38622441 PMCID: PMC11018675 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04605-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE A new resistance locus acting against the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida was mapped to chromosome VI in the diploid wild potato species Solanum spegazzinii CPC 7195. The potato cyst nematodes (PCN) Globodera pallida and Globodera rostochiensis are economically important potato pests in almost all regions where potato is grown. One important management strategy involves deployment through introgression breeding into modern cultivars of new sources of naturally occurring resistance from wild potato species. We describe a new source of resistance to G. pallida from wild potato germplasm. The diploid species Solanum spegazzinii Bitter accession CPC 7195 shows resistance to G. pallida pathotypes Pa1 and Pa2/3. A cross and first backcross of S. spegazzinii with Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja cultivar Mayan Gold were performed, and the level of resistance to G. pallida Pa2/3 was determined in progeny clones. Bulk-segregant analysis (BSA) using generic mapping enrichment sequencing (GenSeq) and genotyping-by-sequencing were performed to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are genetically linked to the resistance, using S. tuberosum Group Phureja clone DM1-3 516 R44 as a reference genome. These SNPs were converted into allele-specific PCR assays, and the resistance was mapped to an interval of roughly 118 kb on chromosome VI. This newly identified resistance, which we call Gpa VIlspg, can be used in future efforts to produce modern cultivars with enhanced and broad-spectrum resistances to the major pests and pathogens of potato.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Gartner
- Cell and Molecular Sciences Department, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
- School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9, UK
| | | | - Sanjeev K Sharma
- Cell and Molecular Sciences Department, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
| | - John T Jones
- Cell and Molecular Sciences Department, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
- School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9, UK
| | - Vivian C Blok
- Cell and Molecular Sciences Department, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
| | - Ingo Hein
- Cell and Molecular Sciences Department, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK.
- School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
| | - Glenn J Bryan
- Cell and Molecular Sciences Department, The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang L, Zhao J, Kong L, Huang W, Peng H, Peng D, Meksem K, Liu S. No Pairwise Interactions of GmSNAP18, GmSHMT08 and AtPR1 with Suppressed AtPR1 Expression Enhance the Susceptibility of Arabidopsis to Beet Cyst Nematode. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 12:4118. [PMID: 38140445 PMCID: PMC10747334 DOI: 10.3390/plants12244118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
GmSNAP18 and GmSHMT08 are two major genes conferring soybean cyst nematode (SCN) resistance in soybean. Overexpression of either of these two soybean genes would enhance the susceptibility of Arabidopsis to beet cyst nematode (BCN), while overexpression of either of their corresponding orthologs in Arabidopsis, AtSNAP2 and AtSHMT4, would suppress it. However, the mechanism by which these two pairs of orthologous genes boost or inhibit BCN susceptibility of Arabidopsis still remains elusive. In this study, Arabidopsis with simultaneously overexpressed GmSNAP18 and GmSHMT0 suppressed the growth of underground as well as above-ground parts of plants. Furthermore, Arabidopsis that simultaneously overexpressed GmSNAP18 and GmSHMT08 substantially stimulated BCN susceptibility and remarkably suppressed expression of AtPR1 in the salicylic acid signaling pathway. However, simultaneous overexpression of GmSNAP18 and GmSHMT08 did not impact the expression of AtJAR1 and AtHEL1 in the jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling pathways. GmSNAP18, GmSHMT08, and a pathogenesis-related (PR) protein, GmPR08-Bet VI, in soybean, and AtSNAP2, AtSHMT4, and AtPR1 in Arabidopsis could interact pair-wisely for mediating SCN and BCN resistance in soybean and Arabidopsis, respectively. Both AtSNAP2 and AtPR1 were localized on the plasma membrane, and AtSHMT4 was localized both on the plasma membrane and in the nucleus of cells. Nevertheless, after interactions, AtSNAP2 and AtPR1 could partially translocate into the cell nucleus. GmSNAP18 interacted with AtSHMT4, and GmSHMT4 interacted with AtSNAP2. However, neither GmSNAP18 nor GmSHMT08 interacted with AtPR1. Thus, no pairwise interactions among α-SNAPs, SHMTs, and AtPR1 occurred in Arabidopsis overexpressing either GmSNAP18 or GmSHMT08, or both of them. Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing either GmSNAP18 or GmSHMT08 substantially suppressed AtPR1 expression, while transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing either AtSNAP2 or AtSHMT4 remarkably enhanced it. Taken together, no pairwise interactions of GmSNAP18, GmSHMT08, and AtPR1 with suppressed expression of AtPR1 enhanced BCN susceptibility in Arabidopsis. This study may provide a clue that nematode-resistant or -susceptible functions of plant genes likely depend on both hosts and nematode species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liuping Zhang
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (L.Z.); (J.Z.); (L.K.); (W.H.); (H.P.); (D.P.)
| | - Jie Zhao
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (L.Z.); (J.Z.); (L.K.); (W.H.); (H.P.); (D.P.)
| | - Lingan Kong
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (L.Z.); (J.Z.); (L.K.); (W.H.); (H.P.); (D.P.)
| | - Wenkun Huang
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (L.Z.); (J.Z.); (L.K.); (W.H.); (H.P.); (D.P.)
| | - Huan Peng
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (L.Z.); (J.Z.); (L.K.); (W.H.); (H.P.); (D.P.)
| | - Deliang Peng
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (L.Z.); (J.Z.); (L.K.); (W.H.); (H.P.); (D.P.)
| | - Khalid Meksem
- Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA;
| | - Shiming Liu
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China; (L.Z.); (J.Z.); (L.K.); (W.H.); (H.P.); (D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Han S, Smith JM, Du Y, Bent AF. Soybean transporter AAT Rhg1 abundance increases along the nematode migration path and impacts vesiculation and ROS. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2023; 192:133-153. [PMID: 36805759 PMCID: PMC10152651 DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiad098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Rhg1 (Resistance to Heterodera glycines 1) mediates soybean (Glycine max) resistance to soybean cyst nematode (SCN; H. glycines). Rhg1 is a 4-gene, ∼30-kb block that exhibits copy number variation, and the common PI 88788-type rhg1-b haplotype carries 9 to 10 tandem Rhg1 repeats. Glyma.18G022400 (Rhg1-GmAAT), 1 of 3 resistance-conferring genes at the complex Rhg1 locus, encodes the putative amino acid transporter AATRhg1 whose mode of action is largely unknown. We discovered that AATRhg1 protein abundance increases 7- to 15-fold throughout root cells along the migration path of SCN. These root cells develop an increased abundance of vesicles and large vesicle-like bodies (VLB) as well as multivesicular and paramural bodies. AATRhg1 protein is often present in these structures. AATRhg1 abundance remained low in syncytia (plant cells reprogrammed by SCN for feeding), unlike the Rhg1 α-SNAP protein, whose abundance has previously been shown to increase in syncytia. In Nicotiana benthamiana, if soybean AATRhg1 was present, oxidative stress promoted the formation of large VLB, many of which contained AATRhg1. AATRhg1 interacted with the soybean NADPH oxidase GmRBOHG, the ortholog of Arabidopsis thaliana RBOHD previously found to exhibit upregulated expression upon SCN infection. AATRhg1 stimulated reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation when AATRhg1 and GmRBOHG were co-expressed. These findings suggest that AATRhg1 contributes to SCN resistance along the migration path as SCN invades the plant and does so, at least in part, by increasing ROS production. In light of previous findings about α-SNAPRhg1, this study also shows that different Rhg1 resistance proteins function via at least 2 spatially and temporally separate modes of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaojie Han
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insect Pests, Institute of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
- Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou 311121, China
| | - John M Smith
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Yulin Du
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Andrew F Bent
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Discovering and prioritizing candidate resistance genes against soybean pests by integrating GWAS and gene coexpression networks. Gene 2023; 860:147231. [PMID: 36731618 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2023.147231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Soybean is one of the most important legume crops worldwide. Soybean pests have a considerable impact on crop yield. Here, we integrated publicly available genome-wide association studies and transcriptomic data to prioritize candidate resistance genes against the insects Aphis glycines and Spodoptera litura, and the nematode Heterodera glycines. We identified 171, 7, and 228 high-confidence candidate resistance genes against A. glycines, S. litura, and H. glycines, respectively. We found some overlap of candidate genes between insect species, but not between insects and H. glycines. Although 15% of the prioritized candidate genes encode proteins of unknown function, the vast majority of the candidates are related to plant immunity processes, such as transcriptional regulation, signaling, oxidative stress, recognition, and physical defense. Based on the number of resistance alleles, we selected the ten most promising accessions against each pest species in the soybean USDA germplasm. The most resistant accessions do not reach the maximum theoretical resistance potential, indicating that they might be further improved to increase resistance in breeding programs or through genetic engineering. Finally, the coexpression networks we inferred in this work are available in a user-friendly web application (https://soypestgcn.venanciogroup.uenf.br/) and an R/Shiny package (https://github.com/almeidasilvaf/SoyPestGCN) that serve as a public resource to explore soybean-pest interactions at the transcriptional level.
Collapse
|
5
|
Effector-Dependent and -Independent Molecular Mechanisms of Soybean-Microbe Interaction. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232214184. [PMID: 36430663 PMCID: PMC9695568 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232214184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Soybean is a pivotal staple crop worldwide, supplying the main food and feed plant proteins in some countries. In addition to interacting with mutualistic microbes, soybean also needs to protect itself against pathogens. However, to grow inside plant tissues, plant defense mechanisms ranging from passive barriers to induced defense reactions have to be overcome. Pathogenic but also symbiotic micro-organisms effectors can be delivered into the host cell by secretion systems and can interfere with the immunity system and disrupt cellular processes. This review summarizes the latest advances in our understanding of the interaction between secreted effectors and soybean feedback mechanism and uncovers the conserved and special signaling pathway induced by pathogenic soybean cyst nematode, Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas as well as by symbiotic rhizobium.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhao J, Duan Y, Kong L, Huang W, Peng D, Liu S. Opposite Beet Cyst Nematode Infection Phenotypes of Transgenic Arabidopsis Between Overexpressing GmSNAP18 and AtSNAP2 and Between Overexpressing GmSHMT08 and AtSHMT4. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2022; 112:2383-2390. [PMID: 35439035 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-01-22-0011-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The rhg1-a GmSNAP18 (an α-SNAP) and Rhg4 GmSHMT08 are two major cloned genes conferring soybean cyst nematode resistance in Peking-type soybeans, but the application of α-SNAPs and SHMTs in cyst nematode management remains elusive. In this study, GmSNAP18 and GmSHMT08, together with their orthologs in Arabidopsis, AtSNAP2 (an α-SNAP) and AtSHMT4, were individually transformed into Arabidopsis Col-0 to generate the transgenic lines, and the growth of transgenic plants, beet cyst nematode (BCN) infection phenotypes, and AtSNAP2, AtSHMT4, and AtPR1 expression patterns were analyzed using Arabidopsis-BCN compatible interaction system, in addition with protein-protein interaction assay. Pulldown and BiFC assays revealed that GmSNAP18 and GmSHMT08 interacted with AtSHMT4 and AtSNAP2, respectively. Plant root growth was not impacted by overexpression of GmSNAP18 and AtSNAP2. However, overexpression of GmSHMT08 and AtSHMT4 both increased plant height, additionally, overexpression of GmSHMT08 decreased rosette leaf size. Overexpression of GmSNAP18 and GmSHMT08 both suppressed AtPR1 expression and significantly enhanced BCN susceptibility, while overexpression of AtSNAP2 and AtSHMT4 both substantially boosted AtPR1 expression and remarkably enhanced BCN resistance, in transgenic Arabidopsis. Overexpression of GmSNAP18 reduced, while overexpression of AtSNAP2 unaltered AtSHMT4 expression. Overexpression of GmSHMT08 and AtSHMT4 both suppressed AtSNAP2 expression in transgenic Arabidopsis. Thus, different expression patterns of AtPR1 and AtSHMT4 are likely associated with opposite BCN infection phenotypes of Arabidopsis between overexpressing GmSNAP18 and AtSNAP2, and between overexpressing GmSHMT08 and AtSHMT4; and boosted AtPR1 expression are required for enhanced BCN resistance in Arabidopsis. All these results establish a basis for extension of α-SNAPs and SHMTs in cyst nematode management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zhao
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R. China
| | - Yukai Duan
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R. China
| | - Lingan Kong
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R. China
| | - Wenkun Huang
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R. China
| | - Deliang Peng
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R. China
| | - Shiming Liu
- State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Resistance to the soybean cyst nematode (SCN) is a topic incorporating multiple mechanisms and multiple types of science. It is also a topic of substantial agricultural importance, as SCN is estimated to cause more yield damage than any other pathogen of soybean, one of the world's main food crops. Both soybean and SCN have experienced jumps in experimental tractability in the past decade, and significant advances have been made. The rhg1-b locus, deployed on millions of farm acres, has been durable and will remain important, but local SCN populations are gradually evolving to overcome rhg1-b. Multiple other SCN resistance quantitative trait loci (QTL) of proven value are now in play with soybean breeders. QTL causal gene discovery and mechanistic insights into SCN resistance are contributing to both basic and applied disciplines. Additional understanding of SCN and other cyst nematodes will also grow in importance and lead to novel disease control strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew F Bent
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kochetov AV, Gavrilenko TA, Afanasenko OS. [New genetic tools for plant defense against parasitic nematodes]. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genet Selektsii 2021; 25:337-343. [PMID: 34901730 PMCID: PMC8627880 DOI: 10.18699/vj21.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Нематоды относятся к числу значимых вредителей сельскохозяйственных растений. В обзоре
рассмотрены последние данные о молекулярных механизмах устойчивости растений к цистообразующим
и галловым нематодам, среди которых одни из наиболее вредоносных видов: Globodera rostochiensis, G. pallida, Heterodera schachtii, Meloidogyne chitwoodi и M. incognita. Например, золотистая картофельная нематода
G. rostochiensis, зарегистрированная в 61 субъекте РФ на общей площади 1.8 млн га, способна приводить к потере
от 19 до 90 % урожая картофеля. Биологические особенности нематод затрудняют разработку агротехнических
способов борьбы с ними: цисты G. rostochiensis сохраняют жизнеспособность в почве в течение многих лет, нематициды токсичны или малоэффективны, поэтому предпочтительным методом борьбы с ними является интрогрессия генов устойчивости от родственных культурных и дикорастущих видов. Стратегия жизненного цикла
цистообразующих и галловых нематод основана на способности личинок проникать в корни восприимчивых
видов растений, репрограммировать клетки растения-хозяина, формирующие гигантские клетки или синцитии
в качестве питающих структур, а также ингибировать иммунный ответ. Молекулярные механизмы, лежащие в
основе такого взаимодействия в системе «патоген–хозяин», вызывают значительный интерес как с точки зрения
управления морфогенезом растений, так и в аспекте разработки безопасных и эффективных способов борьбы с
паразитическими нематодами. В обзоре рассмотрены данные об эффекторах, с помощью которых разные виды
нематод контролируют иммунный ответ растения-хозяина, а также гены устойчивости (R-гены) и некоторые
молекулярные механизмы, прерывающие формирование питающих структур и развитие паразита. Приведены
новые данные о способах генетического контроля, основанных на одном из активно обсуждаемых в последнее время варианте механизма РНК-интерференции – HIGS (host induced gene silencing), представляющем собой
адресное выключение экспрессии гена-мишени в клетках личинки нематоды с помощью специфических двуцепочечных РНК, синтезирующихся в клетках растения-хозяина. Индукция РНК-интерференции в клетках растений
приводит к появлению молекул-медиаторов, способных инициировать аналогичный процесс в клетках фитофагов, взаимодействующих с растением, в том числе у личинок нематод. Описаны случаи, в которых такое адресное выключение экспрессии генов-мишеней приводило к нарушениям развития личинок и высокому уровню
защиты сельскохозяйственных растений от наиболее опасных видов нематод.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Kochetov
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - T A Gavrilenko
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia Federal Research Center the N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - O S Afanasenko
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, Pushkin, St. Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gartner U, Hein I, Brown LH, Chen X, Mantelin S, Sharma SK, Dandurand LM, Kuhl JC, Jones JT, Bryan GJ, Blok VC. Resisting Potato Cyst Nematodes With Resistance. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2021; 12:661194. [PMID: 33841485 PMCID: PMC8027921 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.661194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Potato cyst nematodes (PCN) are economically important pests with a worldwide distribution in all temperate regions where potatoes are grown. Because above ground symptoms are non-specific, and detection of cysts in the soil is determined by the intensity of sampling, infestations are frequently spread before they are recognised. PCN cysts are resilient and persistent; their cargo of eggs can remain viable for over two decades, and thus once introduced PCN are very difficult to eradicate. Various control methods have been proposed, with resistant varieties being a key environmentally friendly and effective component of an integrated management programme. Wild and landrace relatives of cultivated potato have provided a source of PCN resistance genes that have been used in breeding programmes with varying levels of success. Producing a PCN resistant variety requires concerted effort over many years before it reaches what can be the biggest hurdle-commercial acceptance. Recent advances in potato genomics have provided tools to rapidly map resistance genes and to develop molecular markers to aid selection during breeding. This review will focus on the translation of these opportunities into durably PCN resistant varieties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Gartner
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
- School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Ingo Hein
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
- School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Lynn H. Brown
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
- School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Xinwei Chen
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Mantelin
- INRAE UMR Institut Sophia Agrobiotech, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Sanjeev K. Sharma
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Louise-Marie Dandurand
- Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology Department, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States
| | - Joseph C. Kuhl
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States
| | - John T. Jones
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
- School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Glenn J. Bryan
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Vivian C. Blok
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Vivian C. Blok,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dutta TK, Papolu PK, Singh D, Sreevathsa R, Rao U. Expression interference of a number of Heterodera avenae conserved genes perturbs nematode parasitic success in Triticum aestivum. PLANT SCIENCE : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PLANT BIOLOGY 2020; 301:110670. [PMID: 33218636 DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera avenae is distributed worldwide and causes substantial damage in bread wheat, Triticum aestivum. This nematode is extremely difficult to manage because of its prolonged persistence as unhatched eggs encased in cysts. Due to its sustainable and target-specific nature, RNA interference (RNAi)-based strategy has gained unprecedented importance for pest control. To date, RNAi strategy has not been exploited to manage H. avenae in wheat. In the present study, 40 H. avenae target genes with different molecular function were rationally selected for in vitro soaking analysis in order to assess their susceptibility to RNAi. In contrast to target-specific downregulation of 18 genes, 7 genes were upregulated and 15 genes showed unaltered expression (although combinatorial soaking showed some of these genes are RNAi susceptible), suggesting that a few of the target genes were refractory or recalcitrant to RNAi. However, RNAi of 37 of these genes negatively altered nematode behavior in terms of reduced penetration, development and reproduction in wheat. Subsequently, wheat plants were transformed with seven H. avenae target genes (that showed greatest abrogation of nematode parasitic success) for host-induced gene silencing (HIGS) analysis. Transformed plants were molecularly characterized by PCR, RT-qPCR and Southern hybridization. Production of target gene-specific double- and single-stranded RNA (dsRNA/siRNA) was detected in transformed plants. Transgenic expression of galectin, cathepsin L, vap1, serpin, flp12, RanBPM and chitinase genes conferred 33.24-72.4 % reduction in H. avenae multiplication in T1 events with single copy ones exhibiting greatest reduction. A similar degree of resistance observed in T2 plants indicated the consistent HIGS effect in the subsequent generations. Intriguingly, cysts isolated from RNAi plants were of smaller size with translucent cuticle compared to normal size, dark brown control cysts, suggesting H. avenae developmental retardation due to HIGS. Our study reinforces the potential of HIGS to manage nematode problems in crop plant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tushar K Dutta
- Division of Nematology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India
| | - Pradeep K Papolu
- Division of Nematology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India
| | - Divya Singh
- Division of Nematology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India
| | - Rohini Sreevathsa
- ICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, 110012, India.
| | - Uma Rao
- Division of Nematology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kochetov AV, Egorova AA, Glagoleva AY, Strygina KV, Khlestkina EK, Gerasimova SV, Shatskaya NV, Vasilyev GV, Afonnikov DA, Shmakov NA, Antonova OY, Alpatyeva NV, Khiutti A, Afanasenko OS, Gavrilenko TA. The mechanism of potato resistance to Globodera rostochiensis: comparison of root transcriptomes of resistant and susceptible Solanum phureja genotypes. BMC PLANT BIOLOGY 2020; 20:350. [PMID: 33050888 PMCID: PMC7557027 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02334-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globodera rostochiensis belongs to major potato pathogens with a sophisticated mechanism of interaction with roots of the host plants. Resistance of commercial varieties is commonly based on specific R genes introgressed from natural populations of related wild species and from native potato varieties grown in the Andean highlands. Investigation of molecular resistance mechanisms and screening the natural populations for novel R genes are important for both fundamental knowledge on plant pathogen interactions and breeding for durable resistance. Here we exploited the Solanum phureja accessions collected in South America with contrasting resistance to G. rostochiensis. RESULTS The infestation of S. phureja with G. rostochiensis juveniles resulted in wounding stress followed by activation of cell division and tissue regeneration processes. Unlike the susceptible S. phureja genotype, the resistant accession reacted by rapid induction of variety of stress response related genes. This chain of molecular events accompanies the hypersensitive response at the juveniles' invasion sites and provides high-level resistance. Transcriptomic analysis also revealed considerable differences between the analyzed S. phureja genotypes and the reference genome. CONCLUSION The molecular processes in plant roots associated with changes in gene expression patterns in response to G. rostochiensis infestation and establishment of either resistant or susceptible phenotypes are discussed. De novo transcriptome assembling is considered as an important tool for discovery of novel resistance traits in S. phureja accessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex V. Kochetov
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia
| | - Anastasiya A. Egorova
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia
- Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia
| | - Anastasiya Y. Glagoleva
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia
- Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia
| | - Kseniya V. Strygina
- Vavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), Saint Petersburg, 190000 Russia
| | - Elena K. Khlestkina
- Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia
- Vavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), Saint Petersburg, 190000 Russia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Olga Y. Antonova
- Vavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), Saint Petersburg, 190000 Russia
| | - Natalia V. Alpatyeva
- Vavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), Saint Petersburg, 190000 Russia
| | - Alexander Khiutti
- All Russian Research Institute for Plant Protection, Saint Petersburg, 196608 Russia
| | - Olga S. Afanasenko
- All Russian Research Institute for Plant Protection, Saint Petersburg, 196608 Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lawaju BR, Niraula P, Lawrence GW, Lawrence KS, Klink VP. The Glycine max Conserved Oligomeric Golgi (COG) Complex Functions During a Defense Response to Heterodera glycines. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2020; 11:564495. [PMID: 33262774 PMCID: PMC7686354 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.564495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
The conserved oligomeric Golgi (COG) complex, functioning in retrograde trafficking, is a universal structure present among eukaryotes that maintains the correct Golgi structure and function. The COG complex is composed of eight subunits coalescing into two sub-complexes. COGs1-4 compose Sub-complex A. COGs5-8 compose Sub-complex B. The observation that COG interacts with the syntaxins, suppressors of the erd2-deletion 5 (Sed5p), is noteworthy because Sed5p also interacts with Sec17p [alpha soluble NSF attachment protein (α-SNAP)]. The α-SNAP gene is located within the major Heterodera glycines [soybean cyst nematode (SCN)] resistance locus (rhg1) and functions in resistance. The study presented here provides a functional analysis of the Glycine max COG complex. The analysis has identified two paralogs of each COG gene. Functional transgenic studies demonstrate at least one paralog of each COG gene family functions in G. max during H. glycines resistance. Furthermore, treatment of G. max with the bacterial effector harpin, known to function in effector triggered immunity (ETI), leads to the induced transcription of at least one member of each COG gene family that has a role in H. glycines resistance. In some instances, altered COG gene expression changes the relative transcript abundance of syntaxin 31. These results indicate that the G. max COG complex functions through processes involving ETI leading to H. glycines resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bisho Ram Lawaju
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States
| | - Prakash Niraula
- Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States
| | - Gary W. Lawrence
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States
| | - Kathy S. Lawrence
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | - Vincent P. Klink
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States
- Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States
- Center for Computational Sciences High Performance Computing Collaboratory, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, United States
- *Correspondence: Vincent P. Klink, ;
| |
Collapse
|