Variation in reproductive photoresponsiveness in a wild population of meadow voles

Predictive and reactive changes in antioxidant defence system in a heterothermic rodent

Living in a seasonal environment requires periodic changes in animal physiology, morphology and behaviour. Winter phenotype of small mammals living in Temperate and Boreal Zones may differ considerably from summer one in multiple traits that enhance energy conservation or diminish energy loss. However, there is a considerable variation in the development of winter phenotype among individuals in a population and some, representing the non-responding phenotype (non-responders), are insensitive to shortening days and maintain summer phenotype throughout a year. Differences in energy management associated with the development of different winter phenotypes should be accompanied by changes in antioxidant defence capacity, leading to effective protection against oxidative stress resulting from increased heat production in winter. To test it, we analysed correlation of winter phenotypes of Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) with facultative non-shivering thermogenesis capacity (NST) and oxidative status. We found that in both phenotypes acclimation to winter-like conditions increased NST capacity and improved antioxidant defence resulting in lower oxidative stress (OS) than in summer, and females had always lower OS than males. Although NST capacity did not correlate with the intensity of OS, shortly after NST induction responders had lower OS than non-responders suggesting more effective mechanisms protecting from detrimental effects of reactive oxygen metabolites generated during rewarming from torpor. We suggest that seasonal increase in antioxidant defence is programmed endogenously to predictively prevent oxidative stress in winter. At the same time reactive upregulation of antioxidant defence protects against reactive oxygen species generated during NST itself. It suggests that evolution of winter phenotype with potentially harmful characteristics was counterbalanced by the development of protective mechanisms allowing for the maintenance of phenotypic adjustments to seasonally changing environment.

Are Humans Seasonally Photoperiodic?

Humans exhibit seasonal variation in a wide variety of behavioral and physiological processes, and numerous investigators have suggested that this might be because we are sensitive to seasonal variation in day length. The evidence supporting this hypothesis is inconsistent. A new hypothesis is offered here—namely, that some humans indeed are seasonally photoresponsive, but others are not, and that individual variation may be the cause of the inconsistencies that have plagued the study of responsiveness to photoperiod in the past. This hypothesis is examined in relation to seasonal changes in the reproductive activity of humans, and it is developed by reviewing and combining five bodies of knowledge: correlations of human birthrates with photoperiod; seasonal changes in the activity of the neuroendocrine pathway that could link photoperiod to gonadal steroid secretion in humans; what is known about photoperiod, latitude, and reproduction of nonhuman primates; documentation of individual variation in photoresponsiveness in rodents and humans; and what is known about the evolutionary ecology of humans.

Tau Differences between Short-Day Responsive and Short-Day Nonresponsive White-Footed Mice (Peromyscus leucopus) Do Not Affect Reproductive Photoresponsiveness

In laboratory-bred rodent populations, intraspecific variation in circadian system organization is a known cause of individual variation in reproductive photoresponsiveness. The authors sought to determine whether circadian system variation accounted for individual variation in reproductive photoresponsiveness in a single, highly genetically variable population of Peromyscus leucopusrecently derived from the wild. Running-wheel activity patterns of male and female mice, aged 70 to 90 days, from artificially selected lines of reproductively photoresponsive (R) and nonresponsive (NR) lines were monitored under short-day photoperiod (8 h light, 16 h dark), long-day photoperiod (16 h light, 8 h dark), and constant darkness (DD). NR mice displayed a significantly longer mean free-running period (24.08 h) in DD compared with R mice (23.75 h), due in large part to a difference between NR and R females (24.25 h vs. 23.74 h, respectively). All other entrainment characteristics (alpha, phase angle of activity) under short days, long days, and DD were similar between R and NR mice. Variation in free- running period and entrainment characteristics has been shown to affect photoresponsiveness in other rodent species by altering the manner in which the circadian system interprets short days. To determine whether variation in photoresponsiveness in P. leucopus is due to differences in free-running period instead of variation downstream from the central circadian clock in the pathway controlling photoresponsiveness, the authors exposed young R and NR mice to DD and measured the effect on reproductive organ development. If variation in free-running period affected how the circadian system of mice interpreted short days, then both R and NR mice exposed to DD should have exhibited a delay in gonadal development. Only R mice exhibited pubertal delay in DD. NR mice exhibited large paired testes, paired seminal vesicles, paired ovaries, and uterine weight typical of mice nonresponsive to short days, whereas R mice exhibited reproductive organ weight typical of mice responsive to short days. These data suggest that despite significant differences in free-running period between R and NR mice, individual variation in photoresponsiveness is not due to differences in how the circadian systems of R and NR mice interpret the LD cycle.

Climate change and seasonal reproduction in mammals

Seasonal reproduction is common among mammals at all latitudes, even in the deep tropics. This paper (i) discusses the neuroendocrine pathways via which foraging conditions and predictive cues such as photoperiod enforce seasonality, (ii) considers the kinds of seasonal challenges mammals actually face in natural habitats, and (iii) uses the information thus generated to suggest how seasonal reproduction might be influenced by global climate change. Food availability and ambient temperature determine energy balance, and variation in energy balance is the ultimate cause of seasonal breeding in all mammals and the proximate cause in many. Photoperiodic cueing is common among long-lived mammals from the highest latitudes down to the mid-tropics. It is much less common in shorter lived mammals at all latitudes. An unknown predictive cue triggers reproduction in some desert and dry grassland species when it rains. The available information suggests that as our climate changes the small rodents of the world may adapt rather easily but the longer lived mammals whose reproduction is regulated by photoperiod may not do so well. A major gap in our knowledge concerns the tropics; that is where most species live and where we have the least understanding of how reproduction is regulated by environmental factors.

Long-day inhibition of reproduction and circadian photogonadosensitivity in Zembra Island wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)

We investigated the effects of photoperiod on testicular activity in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) captured on Zembra Island (North Tunisia) and maintained in experimental photoperiodic conditions. Sexually inactive animals were subjected to alternate 3-mo periods of short days (8L:16D) and long days (16L:8D) for 1 yr. Testicular activity increased significantly and then decreased to levels equivalent to or lower than those measured during sexual quiescence after 1 mo of 8L:16D or 16L:8D, respectively. Eight groups of sexually active animals were also exposed to 8L:16D for 60 days. The light phase was divided into two photofractions (7.5 and 0.5 h). The short photofraction interrupted the dark phase 9.5-18.5 h after the beginning of the main photofraction. Testicular activity was inhibited if the short photofraction interrupted the dark phase 12.5 h or more after the beginning of the main photofraction. These results clearly confirm that photoperiod affects reproduction in this species: Short days stimulate reproduction, whereas long days inhibit it. The asymmetric pattern of skeleton photoperiods used demonstrated the existence of a circadian rhythm for photogonadosensitivity, with the photosensitive phase beginning 12.5 h after dawn. In this species, photoperiod length controls both the beginning and the end of the reproductive period. These results differ from those obtained with continental populations of wild rabbits, in which reproduction is inhibited by short day length. This difference may reflect genetic drift linked to the geographic isolation of this population, which is known to have been present on this small island for more than 2000 yr.

A plastic interval timer synchronizes pubertal development of summer- and fall-born hamsters

Summer and fall decreases in day length induce reproductive regression in adult hamsters and delay reproductive maturation of their young. The following year pubertal development is triggered by an interval timer (IT) that renders animals refractory to inhibitory short day lengths after approximately 25 wk. Timing of gonadal and somatic development was examined among offspring born to Siberian hamsters in early-August vs. late-September day lengths. Pubertal maturation was delayed in both groups until late winter. Gonadal growth occurred at significantly later ages among August- vs. September-born males as did late-winter spurts in ponderal growth of both sexes. Timing of reproductive and somatic development depended on postnatal rather than prenatal photoperiod exposure and was unrelated to the circadian entrainment status of dams. When developmental patterns were assessed in relation to time of year, group differences were largely eliminated. Because the IT triggers these developmental events, its duration must be plastic. This plasticity facilitates a relative synchronization or entrainment of developmental milestones in hamsters born into different late-summer/early-fall photoperiods.

Food restriction affects the gonadotropin releasing hormone neuronal system of male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)

Individuals of species inhabiting temperate and boreal latitudes optimize the timing of energetically costly processes by curtailing nonessential energetically demanding processes when environmental conditions are not favourable. One proximate environmental variable used to fine-tune moment-to-moment changes in reproductive physiology and behaviour is food intake. The neuroendocrine mechanisms by which food restriction leads to the cessation of reproduction in seasonally breeding rodent species remain largely unspecified. The present study sought to determine the effects of extended food restriction on the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal system. Male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) were either fed ad libitum or were exposed to either 1, 2 or 3 weeks of moderate (70% of daily mean) food restriction. In accordance with previous studies of food restriction, gross reproductive organ masses and body mass were unaffected by food deprivation. Although 1 week of food restriction did not result in alterations in the GnRH neuronal system, food restriction for 2 weeks was associated with increased GnRH-immunoreactive (GnRH-ir) neurone soma size. Three weeks of food restriction resulted in a pronounced increase in GnRH-ir neurone numbers, as well as an increase in fibre intensity in the main fibre pathway to the median eminence. Taken together, these findings suggest that extended food restriction leads to modifications in the GnRH neuronal system, providing a means for temporary cessation of reproduction without gross alterations in reproductive physiology. This transient change in the hypothalmo-pituitary-gonadal axis, without pronounced changes in reproductive organ morphology, likely provides a mechanism for the rapid reinitiation of breeding in nature when local conditions provide adequate food availability.

Individual differences in radial maze performance and locomotor activity in the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus

Individual differences in the radial maze performance and locomotor activity of wild-caught and first-generation laboratory-born meadow voles are described. Based on their patterns of response in an eight-arm radial maze the essentially wild voles fell into three behavioral categories: 1) strict algorithmic (i.e., they systematically chose the next adjacent arm to their previous choice); 2) nonalgorithmic (i.e., they ran the maze without any consistent or definable pattern); and 3) nonrunners (i.e., nonperformers of the task who remained relatively immobile in the arms of the maze). The algorithmic and nonalgorithmic voles further differed in their responses to an interference manipulation of the radial maze task. Algorithmic individuals displayed a marked performance deficit, while the nonalgorithmic individuals showed minimal disruption to a 1-min delay interruption of the maze task. Measurements of several aspects of locomotor activity using the automated Digiscan activity monitoring system revealed that the algorithmic individuals also displayed significantly greater levels of activity than the nonalgorithmic or nonrunners, with no significant difference in activity between the latter two groups. These findings suggest that the algorithmic voles were relatively inflexible in their behavior, while the nonalgorithmic individuals were more flexible in their maze performance and likely in their use of spatial and nonspatial information. These individual differences in laboratory measures of learning behavior and locomotor activity in meadow voles are consistent with the polymorphism that is proposed to occur in the wild.

Do small voles require less food than large voles?

Many small mammals lose body mass in the fall and winter. Laboratory studies suggest that the cause of this varies from individual to individual, at least in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. The short day lengths of fall induce this adaptation in some individuals, presumably to promote winter survival. Other individuals, side-by-side neighbors, are insensitive to this cue; they enter winter with a larger body mass that they may not be able to maintain if conditions become too harsh. A long-held assumption is that the photoregulated loss of mass allows energy to be conserved by decreasing the amount of food required for survival and, thus, decreasing foraging time. The present experiment tested the hypothesis that smaller, photoresponsive meadow voles do indeed consume less food and spend less time feeding than larger individuals, which are not photoresponsive. This hypothesis was tested in conditions meant to simulate some of the energy challenges faced by voles at the onset of winter. Representatives of each phenotype were housed in cages in which they had to leave their nests in order to feed, and in which food intake and time spent feeding could be monitored. At 25°C the two groups did not differ in either food intake or time spent feeding; the smaller animals required more food per gram of body mass. Food quality was reduced and, later, ambient temperature was decreased to 3°C. Food intake and feeding time were again almost identical in the two groups. It is suggested that the hypothesis failed to find support in this experiment because it does not take into account the higher thermoregulatory costs associated with a decrease in size.

Role of melatonin in mediating seasonal energetic and immunologic adaptations

Winter is energetically demanding and stressful; thermoregulatory demands increase when food availability usually decreases. Physiological and behavioral adaptations, including termination of breeding, have evolved among nontropical animals to cope with the energy shortages during winter. Presumably, selection for the mechanisms that permit physiological and behavioral anticipation of seasonal ambient changes have led to current seasonal breeding patterns for many populations. In addition to the well-studied seasonal cycles of mating and birth, there are also significant seasonal cycles of illness and death among field populations of mammals and birds. Energetically challenging winter conditions can directly induce death via hypothermia, starvation, or shock; surviving these demanding conditions likely puts individuals under great physiological stress. The stress of coping with energetically demanding conditions may increase adrenocortical steroid levels that could indirectly cause illness and death by compromising immune function. Individuals would enjoy a survival advantage if seasonally recurring stressors could be anticipated and countered by bolstering immune function. The primary environmental cue that permits physiological anticipation of season is daily photoperiod, a cue that is mediated by melatonin. However, other environmental factors may interact with photoperiod to affect immune function and disease processes. Immune function is compromised during the winter in field studies of birds and mammals. However, laboratory studies of seasonal changes in mammalian immunity consistently report that immune function is enhanced in short day lengths. To resolve this apparent discrepancy, we hypothesize that winter stressors present in field studies counteract short-day enhancement of immune function. Prolonged melatonin treatment mimics short days, and also enhances rodent immune function. Reproductive responsiveness to melatonin appears to affect immune function. In sum, melatonin may be part of an integrative system to coordinate reproductive, immunologic, and other physiological processes to cope successfully with energetic stressors during winter.

The effects of photoperiod and food intake on reproductive development in male deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus)

Seasonal breeding is a tactic that has evolved in rodents that limits reproduction to specific times of the year to increase reproductive success. In order to time breeding accurately, many animals respond to changes in daily photoperiod. Short day lengths inhibit breeding in many nontropical rodent species. Restricted food availability can also inhibit reproductive function among some individuals in these so-called "photoperiodic" populations. Rodents born at the end of the breeding season typically delay sexual maturation until the following spring. Prepubertal rodents exposed to day lengths that are < 12 h light/day will not undergo puberty for 4-7 months in the laboratory. Food restriction can also affect the timing of puberty onset. Reproductive function of food-restricted juvenile mice may remain inhibited until food availability improves. Alternatively, reproductive function of food-restricted juvenile mice might eventually develop despite restricted food intake. This study examined the effects of chronic food restriction and photoperiod on reproductive development in male deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii). Short-day mice fed ad lib delayed gonadal development for 5-7 months, but eventually achieved reproductive maturity. The reproductive function of short-day mice fed ad lib was indistinguishable from long-day control animals when assessed at week 32. Long-day food-restricted mice exhibited an intermediate level of gonadal development and function. Short-day food-restricted deer mice also inhibited reproductive growth, but failed to demonstrate reproductive maturity by week 32 of the study. Taken together, these results suggest that retardation of reproductive development by food restriction is only superficially similar to the delay in reproductive maturation imposed by short day exposure. It does not appear that male deer mice escape from the inhibitory effects of food restriction to attain sexual development.

Photoperiod nonresponsive Siberian hamsters: effect of age on the probability of nonresponsiveness

Groups from three different breeding lines of Siberian hamsters (UNS = general colony animals, PNRa = selected for photoperiod nonresponsiveness as adults, PNRj = selected for photoperiod nonresponsiveness as juveniles) were exposed to short days at weaning and again as adults (Experiment 1) or only as adults (Experiment 2). The proportion of photoperiod nonresponsive individuals in each line was determined by measuring testis length after 6 weeks of exposure to short days (juveniles) or by paired testis weights after 12 weeks in short photoperiod (adults). Adults were blood sampled on the day of sacrifice (Experiment 1) or on Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 (Experiment 2) for determination of serum prolactin (PRL) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations. Nonresponsive individuals were present in all three lines of hamsters. Furthermore, all three lines of hamsters showed an increase in the proportion of nonresponders with age; some individuals are responsive to short days as juveniles, but become nonresponsive in adulthood. The two PNR lines exhibited a greater proportion of nonresponders at both ages compared to the UNS line, with the PNRj line exhibiting the greatest proportion of nonresponders at each age. During exposure to short days, nonresponders exhibited significantly higher serum PRL and FSH concentrations that did the UNS line; nonresponders also exhibited larger testis size, and fewer animals molted to winter-type pelage. The results indicate that (a) in all three lines, a significantly higher proportion of animals are nonresponsive to short photoperiod as adults than as juveniles; (b) selection for nonresponsiveness as juveniles can produce a line of hamsters that, as adults, are nearly all nonresponsive to short days; and (c) some individuals from each line are responsive to short photoperiod early in life, but become nonresponsive as adults.

Evidence that the circadian system mediates photoperiodic nonresponsiveness in Siberian hamsters: the effect of running wheel access on photoperiodic responsiveness

Juvenile male Siberian hamsters from a line of hamsters selected for nonresponsiveness to short photoperiod (PNRj) and animals from the general colony (UNS) were separated at weaning into two groups. Group 1 males were moved into short days (10 h light:14 h dark [10L:14D]) with free access to running wheels (RW). Group 2 animals were the male siblings of Group 1 hamsters; they were moved at the same time into the same room, but were housed in cages without access to RW. Group 2 hamsters only had access to RW for the final week of short-day exposure (Week 8). Animals were blood sampled at the time of sacrifice for analysis of serum prolactin (PRL) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations. At sacrifice, paired testis weights were obtained and pelage color was scored. Animals from the UNS line showed the expected declines in testis weight, body weight, and serum concentrations of both PRL and FSH, regardless of the presence or absence of RW. These animals also exhibited a high proportion of individuals molting to winter-type pelage. By contrast, a marked difference was noted between siblings from the PNRj line depending on whether RW access was provided at the time of weaning. Animals with access to RW exhibited identical responses to those of the UNS responder animals, whereas PNRj animals without access to RW showed no adjustments to short days (i.e., testis regression, pelage molt, expansion of alpha). In a second experiment, PNRj and UNS males were placed in constant darkness (DD), with or without RW access. The results of this experiment indicated that PNRj animals respond to DD regardless of the presence or absence of RW. In DD, PNRj hamsters also exhibited significantly longer free-running period lengths (taus) than did UNS hamsters; all the PNRj hamsters had taus > 24 h, whereas none of the UNS hamsters had a tau > 24 h. These results indicate that PNRj hamsters retain the proper neural pathways for responding to short day lengths and establish a role for locomotor activity feedback in modulating the circadian system and, subsequently, photoperiodic responsiveness in PNRj hamsters.

Running-induced testicular recrudescence in the meadow vole: role of the circadian system

Access to running wheels stimulates testicular recrudescence in meadow voles whose reproductive axes have been suppressed by short day lengths. The present experiments addressed the mechanism by which running stimulates the reproductive system. The results from two experiments suggest that running acts specifically to override the short day length suppression of the gonads: access to running wheels had no stimulatory effect on the testes of meadow voles housed in long day lengths, and the degree to which running stimulated the testes of meadow voles housed under short day lengths was significantly correlated with the degree to which the voles were reproductively photoresponsive. A third experiment queried whether running shifts the circadian clock in such a way as to cause an overlap between the short day length photoperiod and the period of sensitivity to light. This proved not to be the case: access to running wheels stimulated testicular recrudescence in meadow voles housed in constant darkness. Two experiments demonstrated that access to a running wheel did not alter short day length profiles of pineal melatonin content or the nocturnal rise in pineal melatonin content in the absence of light. Finally, daily patterns of circulating corticosterone levels did differ between voles with and without access to running wheels, although the difference could not be attributed to differences in the circadian system. Overall, these experiments suggest that running stimulates gonadal recrudescence by acting on the pathway by which photoperiod suppresses reproduction downstream of melatonin production.

Reactions of reproductively photoresponsive versus unresponsive meadow voles to simulated winter conditions

At least some populations of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) comprise individuals that vary greatly in the degree to which their reproduction can be controlled by day length. Some individuals respond to the short days of winter with complete gonadal inhibition, others are insensitive to this cue and thus have the capacity to reproduce opportunistically during the winter, and still others are intermediate in their responsiveness. The relative costs and benefits associated with some of the nonreproductive dimensions of these different strategies are explored. The two extreme phenotypes, reproductively photoresponsive and unresponsive individuals, were exposed in the laboratory to winter versus summer conditions, as defined by photoperiod, temperature, and quality of diet. This was done in cages that required the voles to leave their nests and subject themselves to ambient conditions in order to feed. The winter condition exerted a potent influence on body mass, body fat, food intake, nest building, pelage depth, and the amount and temporal pattern of feeding, as well as reproductive potential. The results suggest that the major nonreproductive advantage enjoyed by the photoregulated phenotype is a decrease in body mass and hence a decrease in required foraging time that anticipates harsh winter conditions. The opportunists also may lose mass in response to harsh conditions, but this is a direct and immediate response for which they may be poorly prepared.