Research requires action

The therapeutic potential of PDE4 inhibitors

Phosphodiesterase enzymes are responsible for the inactivation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) is a cAMP specific phosphodiesterase expressed in inflammatory cells such as eosinophils. Inhibition of PDE4 results in an elevation of cAMP in these cells, which in turn downregulates the inflammatory response. The anti-inflammatory effects of PDE4 inhibitors have been well documented both in vitro and in vivo in a variety of animal models. The potential use of PDE4 inhibitors as anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of asthma and other inflammatory disorders has received considerable attention from the pharmaceutical industry, but to date, there are no selective PDE4 inhibitors on the market. Early PDE4 inhibitors, typified by rolipram, suffered from dose-limiting side effects, including nausea and emesis, which severely restricted their therapeutic utility. Second generation compounds, including CDP840 and SB207499 (Ariflo), have been identified with reduced side effect liability. Recent evidence suggests a correlation between side effects and the ability of compounds to bind at the so-called high affinity rolipram binding site (HPDE), whilst beneficial effects appear to correlate with binding at the catalytic site. A number of companies are actively pursuing compounds which exhibit improved affinity for the catalytic site and reduced affinity for the HPDE, in the expectation that this will provide compounds with an improved therapeutic index.

Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: relating structure and function

Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) comprise a superfamily of metallophosphohydrolases that specifically cleave the 3',5'-cyclic phosphate moiety of cAMP and/or cGMP to produce the corresponding 5'-nucleotide. PDEs are critical determinants for modulation of cellular levels of cAMP and/or cGMP by many stimuli. Eleven families of PDEs with varying selectivities for cAMP or cGMP have been identified in mammalian tissues. Within these families, multiple isoforms are expressed either as products of different genes or as products of the same gene through alternative splicing. Regulation of PDEs is important for controlling myriad physiological functions, including the visual response, smooth muscle relaxation, platelet aggregation, fluid homeostasis, immune responses, and cardiac contractility. PDEs are critically involved in feedback control of cellular cAMP and cGMP levels. Activities of the various PDEs are highly regulated by a panoply of processes, including phosphorylation events, interaction with small molecules such as cGMP or phosphatidic acid, subcellular localization, and association with specific protein partners. The PDE superfamily continues to be a major target for pharmacological intervention in a number of medically important maladies.

Proposal for pharmacologically distinct conformers of PDE4 cyclic AMP phosphodiesterases

cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitors display a range of activities in vitro and in vivo which suggest they may be useful in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. However, these compounds elicit a number of side-effects which may limit their therapeutic potential. Certain side-effects of PDE4 inhibitors such as emesis and gastric acid secretion are associated with their actions at a high affinity rolipram binding site (HARBS). In contrast, a number of anti-inflammatory actions of PDE4 inhibitors are better correlated with inhibition of PDE4 catalytic activity than with displacement of [3H] rolipram from HARBS. This suggests that native PDE4s in different cell-types can be discriminated pharmacologically. Although known to be associated with PDE4, the nature of HARBS is uncertain. The majority of evidence suggests it represents particular conformational states of PDE subtypes with which rolipram interacts with high potency (KD approximately 2 nM) (High-affinity PDE4, HPDE4). Rolipram is generally moderately or weakly active (IC50-200 nM-2000 nM) in inhibiting catalytic activity of the majority of crude, partially-purified or recombinant PDE4-preparations (Low-affinity PDE4, LPDE4). Solubilization or V/GSH treatment of particulate eosinophil PDE4, cAMP-dependent kinase activation of RNPDE4D3 and membrane association of HSPDE4A4 increase the potencies of some (e.g., rolipram) but not other (e.g., trequinsin) inhibitors. In eosinophils, the changes in enzyme properties brought about by solubilization result in a close correlation between the potency order of compounds in inhibiting cAMP hydrolysis and displacing [3H] rolipram from HARBS. The identification of distinct pharmacological PDE4 forms may have therapeutic consequences since it may be possible to synthesize potent inhibitors of LPDE4 with low affinity for HARBS which should, theoretically, be less emetic. Most inhibitors synthesized to date (rolipram, denbufylline nitraquazone, etc.) display high-affinity for HARBS but are much weaker in inhibiting cAMP hydrolysis. Other compounds (RP 73401, trequinsin, CDP 840) display slightly higher potency against LPDE4 or do not discriminate between the two putative PDE4 forms. Recently, inhibitors have been synthesized which are considerably more active against LPDE4 than HPDE4. Such compounds with appropriate pharmacokinetic properties may retain anti-inflammatory activity but have a reduced capacity to cause nausea and emesis and, consequently, have a wider therapeutic window than compounds currently undergoing clincial evaluation.

Subtypes of the type 4 cAMP phosphodiesterases: structure, regulation and selective inhibition

The 'famille nombreuse' of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases, responsible for degrading the ubiquitous second messenger molecules, cAMP and cGMP, maintains its place as a major focus of interest for many research laboratories in both academia and industry. The increase in knowledge of the primary sequences, plus the availability of selective inhibitors, are rapidly improving our insight into the structure, regulation and function of these pivotal enzymes of cellular homeostasis. Here, Thomas Müller, Peter Engels and John Fozard focus on family 4 of the phosphodiesterases, which is of particular interest owing to both the number of genes (and splice variants) and the emergence of selective inhibitors, which are enabling the functional significance of these enzymes to be defined.