The effect of patient position on radiotherapy protocol deviations in the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia

An evaluation of the relationship between the quality of prophylactic cranial radiotherapy in childhood acute leukemia and institutional experience: a Quality Assurance Review Center-Pediatric Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

The Pediatric Oncology Group Protocol 9404 was a prospective clinical trial of two forms of chemotherapy in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and advanced stage T-cell lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The protocol called for prophylactic C1 whole brain external beam irradiation, 18 Gy in 2 Gy/fraction for 9 fractions. We hypothesized that a correlation would be found between the number of children irradiated on protocol by an institution and the compliance rate of that institution with radiotherapy quality assurance (QA) guidelines. We also hypothesized that QA compliance would improve as the study progressed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We scored the radiation dose as a minor deviation from protocol guidelines if the dose to the prescription point differed from the protocol by 6-10%, and a major deviation if it differed from protocol by > 10%. Treatment volumes were scored as a minor deviation if the margins were less than specified or the fields were excessively large. A major deviation was defined as the transection of a potential leukemia-bearing volume such as would be caused by blocking the cribriform plate, optic nerve, or temporal lobe. When the treating physician submitted a treatment plan and simulator film at the initiation of therapy to the Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC), a rapid turn-around review of the plan and suggestions for improvement was provided. At the end of therapy, all simulator and port films were reviewed at the QARC.

RESULTS

We reviewed the data from 353 patients treated at 73 institutions in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Of these patients, 2% (n = 7) were not assessable for QA because of incomplete information. Minor quality deviations were found in 27.7% of patients (n = 98) and major deviations in 7.9% (n = 28). The frequency of major deviations for institutions placing 1-4 patients on study was 11% vs. 5.5% for institutions placing > or =5 patients (p < 0.09). The frequency of minor deviations was 28.6% for institutions placing 1-4 patients on study vs. 27.1% for institutions placing >5 patients (p not significant). The frequency of major deviations fell over time (1996-1997, 15.5% vs. 1998-2001, 4.7%, p < 0.001). The frequency of minor deviations did not (1996-1997, 29.9% vs. 1998-2001, 26.9%, p not significant).

CONCLUSION

For a relatively simple radiotherapy field, with clearly written protocol guidelines and rapid turn-around corrections from QARC, the rate of minor deviations was no different between institutions placing 1-4 patients on study and those placing > or =5. A trend (p < 0.09) was noted, however, for major deviations to decrease as a function of institutional experience, as well as over time (p < 0.001), supporting the validity of the hypothesis that pediatric clinical experience matters in QA for C1 whole brain leukemia radiotherapy.

The cribriform plate: a sanctuary site for meningeal leukaemia

Cranial irradiation is an effective prophylactic treatment for subclinical meningeal infiltration in lymphoblastic leukaemia. However, central nervous system (CNS) relapse still occurs in 6-10% of cases overall and in as many as 30% of cases with a poor prognosis in some series. These recurrences may be due in part to inadvertent underdosage of the cribriform plate, which is centrally situated between the orbits and is projected over their upper third in a lateral view. The dose to the adjacent meninges may thus be reduced by shielding of the radiosensitive lenses. This problem is exacerbated if conventional lateral fields centred on the mid-skull are used, because the eyes will not then project over one another. If the field centre is moved to the edge of the orbit, this problem of beam divergence can be overcome. Central axis beam blocking of both lenses is then possible, and in some patients the cribriform plate can be adequately irradiated. However, in most children the geometry of the orbit is such that it is necessary to add an anterior electron beam to ensure homogeneous dosage. These refinements in irradiation technique might prevent meningeal relapse with a lower whole-brain dose and, hence, fewer neuropsychological sequelae. This hypothesis could be tested in a clinical trial.

Development of quality assurance in radiation therapy in North America

Although diagnostic radiology developed rapidly following Roentgen's discovery, limitations on voltage delayed penetrating external radiation therapy until after World War II. Quality assurance has developed in both the USA and Canada in many different institutions. Tolerances for implementation of the prescribed tumor dose have been established. A series of quality assurance procedures for calibration, three dimensional dose distributions, the treatment planning process, and for treatment delivery have been formulated in protocols and their development is sketched briefly. The importance of computerized tomography in treatment planning and computerized record and verify systems in treatment delivery is emphasized.

Quality assurance in radiation therapy: clinical aspects

A survey was conducted in Latin America to evaluate the clinical aspects of quality assurance in radiotherapy. A questionnaire was prepared and sent to 46 institutions. Twenty-seven centers (58.5%), from nine countries, answered the questionnaire. The study was divided into three topics: a) patient-related statistics; b) staffing and education; and c) equipment and facilities. Fifty-two percent of the radiotherapists and 44% of the physicists work on a part-time basis. One third of the institutions are understaffed. Radiotherapy training programs are available in only 37% of the centers studied. A large number of megavoltage units are old, operating at a shorter than optimum distance with sources of very low activity. The number of high energy linear accelerators is unsatisfactory. Problems in treatment planning facilities were also identified. Regionalization of radiation therapy services is recommended as a possible way to improve quality at a reasonable cost.