Circulating tumor markers and assessment of response to intrahepatic chemotherapy of colon carcinoma

Negative CEA values in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma and the Likelihood of Complete Chemotherapy Response

Introduction

Experimental results reported in the literature have suggested that CEA might inhibit host defense mechanisms and that immunotolerance to CEA could play an important role in the development of metastases in colorectal carcinoma. It might therefore be assumed that negative CEA values during metastatic disease represent a favorable prognostic factor. Surprisingly, there are very few data available about negative CEA. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of negative initial CEA values in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Patients and Methods

Initial CEA values were determined in 114 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The patients were divided into three groups according to these values: I (n=22) <5 ng/mL; II (n=33) 5-100 ng/mL; III (n=59) >100 ng/mL.

Results

Seven/114 complete responses (CR), 22/114 partial responses (PR), 45/114 instances of stable disease (SD) and 38/114 of progressive disease (PD) were registered, while two patients were not evaluable. There were six long-lasting CRs (median 24 months, range 10–37 months) in the CEA-negative patient subset, while in the CEA-positive subset there was only one CR, in a patient with an initial CEA level of 18 ng/mL. The mean initial CEA values in the different response categories were: CR: 4.0 ng/mL; PR: 436 ng/mL; SD: 1442 ng/mL; PD: 6071 ng/mL. The likelihood of response, in particular CR, was highly dependent upon CEA levels (Fisher's exact test, 0.00001). The median survival decreased significantly with increased values of CEA (p=0.006).

Conclusion

Negative CEA in metastatic disease was the main characteristic of the patient subset capable of attaining CR. When relapsing, all patients but one became CEA positive.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen in the Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

CEA is a complex glycoprotein produced by 90% of colorectal cancers and contributes to the malignant characteristics of a tumor. It can be measured in serum quantitatively, and its level in plasma can be useful as a marker of disease. Because of its lack of sensitivity in the early stages of colorectal cancer, CEA measurement is an unsuitable modality for population screening. An elevated preoperative CEA is a poor prognostic sign and correlates with reduced overall survival after surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma. A failure of the CEA to return to normal levels after surgical resection is indicative of inadequate resection of occult systemic disease. Frequent monitoring of CEA postoperatively may allow identification of patients with metastatic disease for whom surgical resection or other localized therapy might be potentially beneficial. To identify this group, serial CEA measurement appears to be more effective than clinical evaluation or any other diagnostic modality, although its sensitivity for detecting recurrent disease is not as high for locoregional or pulmonary metastases as it is for liver metastases. Several studies have shown that a small percentage of patients followed postoperatively with CEA monitoring and who undergo CEA-directed salvage surgery for metastatic disease will be alive and disease-free 5 years after surgery. Furthermore, CEA levels after salvage surgery do appear to predict survival in patients undergoing resection of liver or pulmonary metastases. However, several authors argue that CEA surveillance is not cost-effective in terms of lives saved. In support of this argument, there is no clear difference in survival after resection of metastatic disease with curative intent between patients in whom the second-look surgery was performed on the basis of elevated CEA levels and those with other laboratory or imaging abnormalities. There is also no clear consensus on the frequency or duration of CEA monitoring, although the ASCO guidelines currently recommend every 2-3 months for at least 2 years after diagnosis. In the follow-up of patients undergoing palliative therapy, the CEA level correlates well with response, and CEA is indicative of not only response but may also identify patients with stable disease for whom there is also a demonstrated benefit in survival and symptom relief with combination chemotherapy. More recently, scintigraphic imaging after administration of radiolabeled antibodies afforded an important radionuclide technique that adds clinically significant information in assessing the extent and location of disease in patients with colorectal cancer above and beyond or complementary to conventional imaging modalities. Immunotherapy based on CEA is a rapidly advancing area of clinical research demonstrating antibody and T-cell responses.

Hepatic artery chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases

Fifty per cent of patients with colorectal cancer develop hepatic metastases but only a minority are candidates for potentially curative surgical resection. Hepatic artery chemotherapy (HAC) has been used to treat patients with non-resectable metastases confined to the liver. Although response rates to HAC have been shown to be higher than response rates to systemic chemotherapy, the advantage in terms of survival has been debated. Furthermore, HAC requires surgical catheter placement which adds to the cost and morbidity of treatment. There have now been eight prospective randomized trials of HAC vs intravenous chemotherapy and/or supportive therapy. The present paper analyses the results of these trials with particular reference to survival. Surgical morbidity, treatment-related toxicity and cost are also discussed.

Elevated CA19-9 as the most significant prognostic factor in advanced colorectal carcinoma

Tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9 were analyzed as response indicators and prognostic factors in advanced colorectal carcinoma. Eighty-five patients participated in a phase II chemotherapy study from October 1984 to July 1990. A three-drug schedule was administered including low dose epirubicin and sequential methotrexate 5-fluorouracil, followed by leucovorin rescue. Serum specimens for CEA and CA19-9 were obtained prior to the initiation of chemotherapy, and subsequently at 4-6 weeks' intervals. In univariate analysis Karnofsky, the site of the primary tumor, the extent of metastases, the presence of abdominal or liver metastases, serum CEA (cut-off of 20 micrograms/l), and CA19-9 levels correlated with survival. In stepwise multivariate analysis an elevated CA19-9 level, a poor Karnofsky, and the presence of liver metastases were independent adverse prognostic factors. Tumors originating from the left colon had a better prognosis than the others. This was related to a higher response rate in this patient group. Serum CA19-9 level was the most significant prognostic factor whether it was entered as a continuous or as a dichotomized variable into the model. The median survival of patients with a normal CA19-9 level was 30.0 months (lower 95% confidence interval: 16.4 months; upper limit was not calculable), and with an elevated CA19-9 value 10.3 months (8.0-12.6 months, 95% confidence interval). Five of 85 patients had a complete response and 20 a partial response, the overall response rate being 29%. When compared with tumor shrinkage, "CEA response" and "CA19-9 response" had a sensitivity of 84% and 88% and specificity of 77% and 67%, respectively. In conclusion, serum CEA value seems to be the best tumor marker for response prediction, while CA19-9 level is one of the best available prognostic indicators in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

A proposal of indices to describe the carcinoembryonic antigen time course in in order to assess the effects of treating recurrent colo-rectal carcinoma

In order to assess the effects of treating recurrent or non-resectable colo-rectal cancer, the following 5 indices for the serum CEA time course were devised: 1. If the serum CEA doubling time is altered by any treatment from D1 to D2 we term D2/D1 as the "CEA doubling time ratio" of the treatment; 2. the per cent decrease in the serum CEA level from CEA1 to CEA2 is calculated by (logCEA1 - logCEA2) X 100/logCEA1; 3. the period when the CEA level has returned to normal after a treatment is termed the "normalization period"; 4. "backward time retrieval" is the period between the lowest point of the posttreatment CEA and the crossing-point of this level by the pretreatment rising slope and; 5. "forward time earning" can also be defined. By using these indices, surgical treatments resulted in a higher per cent decrease in CEA, a longer normalization period but a shorter doubling time when the tumor recurred.

Tumour markers in diagnosis and management

The 20-year period since the discovery of AFP by Abelev has seen the introduction of a wide range of new tumour markers and it is now clear that PLC is biologically heterogeneous. Hepatoblastomas, fibrolamellar carcinomas, hepatocellular carcinomas and cholangiocarcinomas may secrete a variety of distinctive markers which are predominantly glycoproteins, and may resemble those found in placenta or fetal liver. Diagnostically, AFP remains the best marker for HCC, both in sensitivity and specificity; it is known to consist of isoforms. In patients with elevated serum AFP and filling defects on liver scan, Con A reactive AFP may differentiate PLC from hepatic metastases, whilst fucosylated AFP may distinguish PLC from benign disorders when AFP is non-diagnostically elevated. With this recognition of tumour heterogeneity the value of a multiple-marker approach has become apparent. The measurement of vitamin B12 binding protein and neurotensin should lead to the detection of most patients with the fibrolamellar variant of HCC and many of these should be resectable. In patients with normal serum AFP levels, HCC-associated GGTP is of major value whilst in low-incidence areas for HCC, patients should also be screened for H-ALP; using a multiple marker approach in high-risk groups, 90% of clinically diagnosed hepatocellular carcinomas are serologically positive. The Chinese and Alaskan studies, in which small, potentially resectable tumours were detected, suggest that it is now possible to achieve 5-year survival figures of up to 60% in HCC patients detected by screening. The value of such a strategy in low-incidence countries is currently under study. In patient monitoring, as in diagnosis, AFP remains the outstanding marker. In AFP-negative patients, other markers including vitamin B12-binding protein, neurotensin, HCC-specific isoenzymes, des-gamma-carboxy-prothrombin and alpha-fucosidase, are of undoubted diagnostic value, but their value as indicants of disease progression remains to be established. In monitoring the response of hepatic metastases, CEA remains the least unsatisfactory marker but should always be used in conjunction with serial ultrasound scans. Tumour markers now play an important role in the diagnosis and monitoring of PLC but a role is also emerging in tumour imaging and drug targeting. The next 20 years should see the introduction of tumour markers of high sensitivity and specificity which make a fundamental contribution not only to detection and monitoring, but also to the effective treatment of liver cancer.