Phase II trial of prolonged continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and interferon-alpha in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Protocol 3292

The Interplay Between Inflammation and Stromal Components in Pancreatic Cancer

Inflammation involves interactions between various immune cells, inflammatory cells, chemokines and cytokines in pancreatic cancer. Cancer cells as well as surrounding stromal and inflammatory cells establish an inflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME). Inflammation is closely associated with immunity. Meanwhile, immune cells are involved in both inflammation and immune response. Tumor-promoting inflammation and tumor-suppressive immunity are two main characteristics of the tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer. Yet, the mechanism of inflammation and immune response in pancreatic cancer development is still unclear due to the dual role of some cytokines and the complicated crosstalk between tumor and stromal components in TME. In this review, we outline the principal cytokines and stromal cells in the pancreatic TME that are involved in the tumor-promoting and immunosuppressive effects of inflammation, and discuss the interaction between inflammation and stromal components in pancreatic cancer progression. Moreover, the clinical approaches based on targeting TME in pancreatic cancer are also summarized. Defining the mechanisms of interplay between inflammation and stromal components will be essential for further development of anti-cancer therapies.

Potentials of interferon therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. To improve survival for patients with pancreatic cancer, research has focused on other treatment modalities like adding biological modulators such as type-I interferons (IFNs). Type I IFNs (ie, IFN-α/IFN-β) have antiproliferative, antiviral, and immunoregulatory activities. Furthermore, they are able to induce apoptosis, exert cell cycle blocking, and sensitize tumor cells for chemo- and radiotherapy. A few years ago in vitro, in vivo, and several clinical trials have been described regarding adjuvant IFN-α therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Some studies reported a remarkable increase in the 2- and 5-year survival. Unfortunately, the only randomized clinical trial did not show a significant increase in overall survival, although the increased median survival implicated that some patients in the experimental group benefited from the adjuvant IFN-α therapy. Furthermore, encouraging in vitro and in vivo data points to a possible role for adjuvant IFN therapy. However, up till now, the use of IFNs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains controversial. This review, therefore, aims to describe, based on the available data, whether there is a distinct role for IFN therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Interferon-alpha modulates the chemosensitivity of CD133-expressing pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease as current chemotherapies with gemcitabine (GEM) are still insufficient. Accumulating evidence suggests that cancer stem cells (CSC) are responsible for chemoresistance and that CD133 is one of the CSC markers in pancreatic cancer. Interferon-alpha (IFN-α), a cytokine with pleiotropic effects, has direct cytotoxic and cytostatic effects on tumor cells. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether IFN-α can modulate the chemosensitivity of a human pancreatic cancer cell line, Capan-1, to GEM. Cell cycles were evaluated for response to GEM with and without IFN-α by BrdU assay. GEM inhibited Capan-1 cell growth in a dose-dependent manner. GEM (IC(50); 100 ng/mL) treatment reduced the number of both CD133(+) and CD133(-) cells in the S phase, induced apoptosis of CD133(-) cells more than that of CD133(+) cells and increased accumulation of CD133(+) cells into the G0/G1 phase. These results infer that CD133(+) cells take shelter into the G0/G1 phase from GEM treatment. IFN-α modulated CD133(+) cells from the G0/G1 phase to the S phase. Consequently, apoptosis was accelerated in both CD133(+) and CD133(-) cells after IFN-α combined with GEM treatment. Furthermore, GEM combined with IFN-α treatment showed a significant tumor suppressive effect in the in vivo study. Importantly, CD133(+) cells showed CSC-like properties, such as generation of spheres, highly invasive ability and high tumorigenesis. These results suggest that IFN-α, as a modulator, could contribute to the treatment of CD133(+) cancer cells and be effective in combined chemotherapies with GEM for pancreatic cancer stem-like cells.

The expression of interferon receptor α/β in human pancreatic cancer in nude mice is essential for tumor response to interferon α treatment

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant interferon based chemoradiation has rendered promising results against pancreatic cancer. This study evaluated the in vivo effect of interferon α on two human pancreatic carcinoma cell lines implanted in nude.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MiaPaCa-2 expressed the interferon α/β receptor and Panc-1 cells did not. Regimen I consisted of intraperitoneal single-agent gemcitabine and Regimen II consisted of IFN-α and gemcitabine biweekly for 30 d.

RESULTS

Regimen I and II significantly decreased median tumor volume compared with control mice (P < 0.001). However, MiaPaCa-2 showed a more dramatic response to Regimen II compared with Panc-1 implanted mice. MiaPaCa-2 and treated with Regimen II showed less metastasis and less local invasion compared with Panc-1 treated with same regimen. Regimen II was more effective on MiaPaCa-2 compared with Regimen I (P < 0.001). There were no differences between Regimens I and II in the Panc-1 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of human pancreatic cancer in nude mice with interferon α and gemcitabine was associated with a reduction in tumor volume. This process was more prominent in the cells that express the interferon receptors.

Type I interferons in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: mechanisms of action and role of related receptors

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the role of type I interferons (IFNs) and IFN receptors in the regulation of cell growth in 3 human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines (BxPC-3, MiaPaCa-2, and Panc-1).

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have a marginal role in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The addition of IFN-alpha showed promising results in early clinical trials.

METHODS

Cell proliferation and apoptosis were evaluated by DNA measurement and DNA fragmentation, respectively. Type I IFN receptor (IFNAR-1 and IFNAR-2 subunits) was determined by quantitative RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. Cell cycle distribution was evaluated by propidium iodide staining and flow-cytometric analysis.

RESULTS

The incubation with IFN-beta for 6 days showed a potent inhibitory effect on the proliferation of BxPC-3 (IC(50), 14 IU/mL) and MiaPaCa-2 (IC(50), 64 IU/mL). The inhibitory effect of IFN-beta was stronger than IFN-alpha in all 3 cell lines and mainly modulated by the stimulation of apoptosis, although cell cycle arrest was induced as well. The expression of the type I IFN receptors was significantly higher in BxPC-3 (the most sensitive cell line to IFN) and mainly localized on the membrane, whereas in Panc-1 (the most resistant cell line) about 60% to 70% of cells were negative for IFNAR-2c with a mainly cytoplasmic staining for IFNAR-2c.

CONCLUSION

The antitumor activity of IFN-beta is more potent than IFN-alpha in pancreatic cancer cell lines through the induction of apoptosis. Further studies should investigate in vivo whether the intensity and distribution of IFNAR-1 and IFNAR-2c may predict the response to therapy with IFN-alpha and IFN-beta in pancreatic cancer.

Interferon receptor alpha/beta is associated with improved survival after adjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer

AIM

Interferons (IFNs) are known to have antiproliferative and immunoregulatory activities that are modulated through specific cell surface ligands, known as IFN-alpha, -beta, and -gamma receptors. The presence of these receptors and their impact on response to adjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer has not been determined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Slides were prepared from 46 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was subsequently used to determine the expression of IFN- alpha/beta receptor-chain 2 (IFN-alpha/betaR) and IFN-gamma receptor-chain 1 (IFN-gammaR). The correlation between IFN receptor expression, tumor characteristics, and the overall patient response to adjuvant therapy were determined analytically.

RESULTS

The IHC performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma demonstrated a high IFN-alpha/betaR expression in 4% (2/46) of patients, moderate expression in 20% (9/46) of patients, and faint or no expression in 76% (35/46) of patients. IHC confirmed a high expression of IFN-gammaR in 52% (24/46) of patients, moderate expression in 35% (16/46) of patients, and faint or no expression in the remaining 13% (6/46) of patients. Thirty-two (69.7%) patients received adjuvant therapy. Clinicopathological survey did not demonstrate any significant correlation between IFN-alpha/betaR and IFN-gammaR expression with regard to tumor size, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, or stage of disease. Use of adjuvant therapy was associated with increased survival in patients with IFN-alpha/betaR-positive tumors compared with patients with IFN-alpha/betaR-negative tumors (24 months versus 14.7 months in log rank test, p=0.012). The expression of IFN-gammaR, however, had no impact on patient survival (20 months vs 17 months; p=0.656, log rank test).

CONCLUSION

IFN-alpha/betaR is associated with improved survival for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who received adjuvant therapy.

Low-dose trimetrexate glucuronate and protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion in previously untreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens have not been shown to prolong survival or provide clinical benefit in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the tolerability of protracted venous infusion (PVI) of 5-FU, modulated by a low dose of the synthetic antifolate trimetrexate, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three chemotherapy-naïve patients were evaluated. Patients were enrolled in four consecutive cohorts in which the weekly dose of trimetrexate was escalated in 10 mg/m2 increments, from 20 to 50 mg/m2. PVI 5-FU was administered at a fixed dose of 225 mg/m2/day. Treatment was administered for 6 successive weeks, every 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were assessable. The maximum tolerated dose of trimetrexate was 40 mg/m2. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicity was diarrhea. There were no treatment-related deaths. Preliminary analysis of activity revealed a response rate of 9%, with 41% of the patients having stable disease for a median duration of 3.8 months. The median survival for the entire group was 6.9 months (range 1-29 months). A clinical benefit response was experienced by 27.2% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose trimetrexate can be safely administered in combination with PVI 5-FU. This treatment is well tolerated and is associated with palliative activity in advanced pancreatic cancer.

A phase II study: docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to further characterise the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel. 43 patients were enrolled into this phase II study. Treatment consisted of a 1-h infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks without premedication with corticosteroids until progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Dose modifications were planned for adverse events. Patients were observed for 1 month after the last docetaxel infusion, to document any late adverse events, with a follow-up every 3 months until death. Response rate and duration were the major efficacy endpoints. Response status was reviewed by an external independent panel. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed during the first treatment cycle. 40 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for safety. After independent review, partial response was recorded in 6 patients (overall response rate, 15%; 95% confidence limit (CI), 7.7-29.8%) and stable disease was recorded in 15 patients (38%). The median duration of response was 5.1 months (range: 3.1-7.2). The median pain control time was 4.5 months (range: 0-8) and the median time to performance status worsening was 2.3 months (range: 0-4.5). Most patients 40 (93.0%) received a relative dose intensity of more than 70% of the planned dose. The incidence and severity of adverse events reflected the known safety profile for docetaxel. Docetaxel clearance was reduced in patients with elevated concentrations of hepatic enzymes or bilirubin. Docetaxel is an active agent for unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma--a case report

Therapeutic modalities for incompletely resected pancreatic carcinoma are rare. Effective treatment must not only prolong the period of palliation but also limit the adverse sequelae of the Whipple procedure so as not to compromise the quality of the remaining life span. New treatments include the use of gemcitabine and type I interferons. We treated a patient with incomplete resection of a pancreatic tumor with two cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and cisplatinum (50 mg/m2) followed by radiotherapy (45 Gy/5 weeks) combined with interferon-beta (three times a week/5 x 10(6) IU). Two small liver metastases occurred subsequently. In all, four cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatinum were delivered. The patient lived at least 9 months with stable metastatic liver disease and local control. He had no acute toxic reactions except for a decrease in the leukocyte count, no long-term side effects, and a satisfactory quality of life. A regimen of sequential gemcitabine/cisplatinum and radiotherapy in combination with interferon-beta deserves further consideration as therapy for pancreatic carcinoma.

Alteration in the radiation-induced LD release in HeLa cells by acyclovir

The aim of the present investigation was to study the effect of various concentrations of acyclovir (ACV) alone or the effect of 0.1 micromol/l acycloir pretreatment on the radion-induced lactate dehydrogenase (LD) release by HeLa cells exposed to 0-3 Gy of gamma-radiation. The plateau-phase cells were treated with 0-100 micromol/l ACV for 8 h or 0.1 micromol/l ACV before exposure to 0-3 Gy of gamma-radiation. The whole media was removed from the culture and the LD release was measured at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 h post-drug treatment or post-irradiation. The ACV treatment resulted in a concentration-dependent elevation in the LD release at all the post-treatment time periods. A peak level for LD release was observed at 0 h up to 1 micromol/l ACV and declined thereafter. However, at higher doses a highest elevation in LD release was observed at 1 h post-treatment. Pretreatment of HeLa cells with 0.1 micromol/l ACV before irradiation to different doses of gamma-radiation resulted in significant elevation in the release of LD in the medium. The LD release was twofold greater in the ACV+irradiation group at 0 h post-irridiation when compared with the concurrent PBS+gamma-radiation group. The highest increase in LD activity was observed at 0 h post-irradiation and a gradual decline thereafter, without restoration to non-drug treated control level up to 4 h post-irradiation. The LD measurements can serve as a short-term assay to evaluate the cytotoxicity of ACV or radiation in vitro.

La Chemioterapia Adiuvante Concomitante Del Carcinoma Pancreatico

Pancreatic cancer is a leading cause of cancer death. Despite improvement in diagnosis and treatment in the last 15 years, mortality rates essentially equal the incidence of the disease. Combination treatment with chemoradiation yields up to now better results than chemotherapy or radiotherapy given alone in consideration of substantial radio and chemoresistance of the cancer cells. This study will review the most important literature data about combination adjuvant treatment and preoperative (primary) chemoradiation in pancreatic cancer. Some other reports will be given on locoregional chemotherapy and finally a brief view on a possible perspective for promising future treatments coming from data of molecular pathology.

Adjuvant chemoradiation after surgery has been shown to be superior to operation alone in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer in many studies, in terms both of local control and median overall survival. Unfortunately, a consistent percentage of patients cannot receive adjuvant treatment since late recovery after surgery or postoperative morbidity. Owing to this last reason, many authors prefer primary chemoradiation in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer; neoadjuvant treatment find out its background in other relevant biological and clinical evaluations.

Some studies report encouraging results with primary chemoradiation using 5-fluorouracil. Other experiences with relatively new drugs, with potent radiosensiting effect, such as gemcitabine or taxol are going on; many of these are phase I studies. Clinical research in the field of preoperative treatment is up to now emerging in some importants Oncological Institutions. The principal actual aim seems to be that of forsee periods of treatment which will be brief and use the dose of chemotherapy that is active, giving acceptable toxicity.

Ongoing trials will give, in the next years, the answer about the improvement of efficacy of treatments largely expected by all researchers.