Renal oncocytoma: a clinicopathologic study of 70 cases

Unexpected Liver Metastasis Three Years after Nephrectomy for Renal Oncocytoma: A Case-report and Review of Literature

N/A.

Is fat quantification based on proton density fat fraction useful for differentiating renal tumor types?

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively assessed the diagnostic accuracy of fat quantification based on proton density fat fraction (PDFF) for differentiating renal tumors.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 98 histologically confirmed clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs), 35 papillary renal cell carcinomas (pRCCs), 14 renal oncocytomas, 16 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (chRCCs), 10 lymphomas, 19 uroepithelial tumors, 10 lipid-poor angiomyolipomas (AMLs), and 25 lipid-rich AMLs were identified in 226 patients (127 males and 99 females) over 5 years. All patients underwent multiparametric kidney MRI. The MRI protocol included an axial plane and a volumetric 3D fat fraction sequence known as mDIXON-Quant for PDFF measurement. Demographic data were recorded, and PDFF values were independently reviewed by two radiologists blinded to pathologic results. MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5 T system. MRI-PDFF measurements were obtained from the solid parts of all renal tumors. Fat quantification was performed using a standard region of interest for each tumor, compared to histopathological diagnoses. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed to calculate the diagnostic accuracy for each histopathological tumor type. Nonparametric variables were compared among the subgroups using the Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann Whitney U test. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In all, 102 patients underwent partial nephrectomy, 70 patients underwent radical nephrectomy, and the remaining 54 had biopsies. Patient age (mean: 58.11 years; range: 18-87 years) and tumor size (mean: 29.5 mm; range: 14-147 mm) did not significantly differ across groups. All measurements exhibited good interobserver agreement. The mean ccRCC MRI-PDFF was 12.6 ± 5.06% (range: 11.58-13.61%), the mean pRCC MRI-PDFF was 2.72 ± 2.42% (range: 2.12-3.32%), and the mean chRCC MRI-PDFF was 1.8 ± 1.4% (range: 1.09-2.5%). Clear cell RCCs presented a significantly higher fat ratio than other RCC types, uroepithelial tumors, lymphomas, and lipid-poor AMLs (p < 0.05). Lipid-rich AMLs demonstrated a very high fat ratio.

CONCLUSION

MRI-PDFF facilitated accurate differentiation of ccRCCs from other renal tumors with high sensitivity and specificity.

Ultrasound of the Upper Urinary Tract

Ultrasound (US) plays a primary role in the assessment and diagnosis of renal and ureteral pathologies and their management. It is considered the first-line imaging modality for evaluation of urinary obstruction, nephrolithiasis, and urinary retention among other indications. US is also essential for evaluation of renal vasculature and assessment of renal transplantation. Contrast-enhanced US is an advanced application of US gaining its acceptance in evaluation of the renal masses.

Renal Oncocytoma Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Patient With Prior Pancoast Tumor

A renal oncocytoma is a benign tumor of the kidney, typically treated surgically or via ablation therapy, while a Pancoast tumor is a rare tumor of the lung apex, most often non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), usually managed with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery. In this report, we discuss the diagnosis and management of a 72-year-old man who developed a renal oncocytoma and a recurrent Pancoast tumor. At the time of our patient's treatment for his renal oncocytoma, thermal and radiofrequency ablation were not frequently employed, and active surveillance was also not the standard of care. Therefore, a partial nephrectomy was offered but declined by the patient over quality of life concerns. Following a discussion with radiation oncology, the patient instead opted for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which was well tolerated. All clinical and imaging follow-up revealed excellent control of the lesion with no progression. To our knowledge, this is one of the first reported cases of an oncocytoma successfully treated with SBRT. The patient's stage 3 NSCLC Pancoast tumor was treated with the vinblastine cisplatin radiation therapy (VCRT) protocol, first developed at the Verspeeten Family Cancer Centre in London, Ontario. It consisted of four cycles of vinblastine and cisplatin, with the last two cycles administered concurrently with radiation therapy. This treatment produced excellent symptom control and an impressive nine years of disease-free survival. When the Pancoast tumor re-emerged at the end of this interval, it was treated with palliative reirradiation, and symptom control was excellent for another 10 months until a right-sided occipital lobe metastatic lesion was discovered and the patient succumbed to his disease. This report provides a clinical example of the viability and safety of SBRT for the treatment of renal oncocytoma. Importantly, SBRT has shown efficacy in treating renal cell carcinoma, the malignant differential of a renal oncocytoma. Clinicians should therefore consider SBRT for a renal oncocytoma when patients decline surgery (or ablation therapy) or when the pathologic diagnosis of the lesion is in doubt. Our case also provides an example of the successful treatment of a non-resectable NSCLC Pancoast tumor with the VCRT regimen and successful palliative re-irradiation of a recurrent Pancoast tumor.

Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review of Its Metastatic Features

Oncocytomas are referred to as benign kidney neoplasms. They primarily affect adults, with patients over 70 years old being the most affected. Renal oncocytomas (ROs) are frequently detected by excision, biopsy, or scan. Hematuria, flank pain, and a palpable mass are the traditional trio of symptoms. Oncocytomas appear as well-circumscribed, tan or mahogany-coloured masses with a central scar that is stellate. Histological features include well-circumscribed lesions, bland cytology, eosinophilic cytoplasm, regular nuclei with prominent central nucleoli, and nested architecture. ROs are rarely linked to an aggressive clinical course and have an excellent prognosis. There is proof that the disease can spread to the liver and bones. Some literature has also reported oncocytoma metastases to the lung and liver. This systematic review of the literature examines and evaluates the malignant potential of oncocytoma. The purpose of the study was to determine whether ROs can be diagnosed as a benign condition or if malignancy needs to be considered and investigated. Seventeen studies were analysed which had a total of 412 ROs. Four patients (one percent) died as a result of their illness. There was evidence of disease progression in every patient who passed away from their illness. Six patients (1.5%) experienced disease progression in total. Three hundred and seventeen patients (80%) underwent radical nephrectomy, while 81 patients (20%) underwent partial nephrectomy. Liver, bone, lung, lymphadenopathy, and local recurrence were among the metastasis sites. Perinephric fat invasion, renal sinus fat invasion, renal capsular invasion, and vascular invasion are characteristics of metastatic behavior that have been found. Despite this, the small number of patients who experienced disease progression and/or death as a result of ROs implies that aggressive malignant behavior is not always correlated with the presence of metastatic features or disease. Oncocytomas should be viewed as having a low potential for malignancy rather than as benign. Individuals who exhibit aggressive characteristics, such as vascular invasion and/or perinephric fat invasion, have an atypically good prognosis. Despite advancements in imaging and immunochemical techniques, it is indisputable that ROs, which were first classified as renal tumours in 1976, continue to pose a diagnostic challenge for multidisciplinary teams. There is considerable variation in practice across the globe due to difficulties in confirming ROs, especially when it comes to metastatic disease. There is even more variation in the management of follow-up care that follows. This will remain the MDT's current state until randomised controlled trials, long-term results, and a better comprehension of the behavior of this tumour are obtained.

Vascular, adipose tissue, and/or calyceal invasion in clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumour: potentially problematic diagnostic scenarios

AIMS

The 2022 WHO classification for kidney tumours recently downgraded clear cell tubulopapillary (also known as clear cell papillary) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to a benign neoplasm (i.e. clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumour) based on the overwhelmingly banal nature of this neoplasm. However, it has been recognized that some clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumours demonstrate vascular, adipose or pelvicalyceal invasion, raising the possibility of more aggressive behaviour. The goal of this study was to determine if these 'high stage' features have an effect on tumour prognosis, warranting a carcinoma designation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After excluding cases with tissue artefact (i.e. prior core biopsy track changes) and other RCC subtypes with next-generation sequencing, nine clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumours with these so-called 'high stage' features, and otherwise classic morphologic and immunophenotypic findings, including low-grade cytology and 'cup-like' CA9 expression, were evaluated. Median tumour size was 2.2 cm with a range of 0.8 to 6.7 cm. Eight cases (89%) demonstrated perinephric or hilar adipose tissue invasion, although most of these cases showed a bulging (in contrast to an infiltrative) growth pattern. One case demonstrated renal vascular invasion in addition to hilar adipose tissue invasion, and one case demonstrated extension into the pelvicalyceal system. There were no recurrences or evidence of metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

These overall findings continue to support the benign designation for clear cell tubulopapillary renal cell tumours, despite morphologic features that might raise the possibility of a 'higher stage' neoplasm.

Low-grade oncocytic tumor: a review of radiologic and clinical features

PURPOSE

The 2022 World Health Organization classification of renal neoplasia expanded the spectrum of oncocytic neoplasms to encompass newly established and emerging entities; one of the latter is the low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT). This study reports the radiologic appearance and clinical behavior of LOT.

METHODS

In this IRB-approved, HIPPA-compliant retrospective study, our institution's pathology database was searched for low-grade oncocytic tumors or neoplasms. Patient age, gender, and comorbidities were obtained from a review of electronic medical records, and imaging characteristics of the tumors were assessed through an imaging platform.

RESULTS

The pathology database search yielded 14 tumors in 14 patients. Four patients were excluded, as radiologic images were not available in three, and one did not fulfill diagnostic criteria after pathology re-review. The resulting cohort consisted of 10 tumors (median diameter 2.3 cm, range 0.7-5.1) in 10 patients (median age 68 years, range 53-91, six women). All tumors presented as a solitary, well-circumscribed, mass with solid components. All enhanced as much or almost as much as adjacent renal parenchyma; all but one enhanced heterogeneously. None had lymphadenopathy, venous invasion, or metastatic disease at presentation or at clinical follow-up (median, 22.2 months, range 3.4-71.6). Among five tumors undergoing active surveillance, mean increase in size was 0.4 cm/year at imaging follow-up (median 16.7 months, range 8.9-25.4).

CONCLUSION

LOT, a recently described pathologic entity in the kidney, can be considered in the differential diagnosis of an avidly and typically heterogeneously enhancing solid renal mass in an adult patient.

Oncocytic Carcinoma with Liver Metastasis: Unusual Treatment Strategies and Clinical Insights-A Case Report and Review of the Literature

We report a distinctive case of malignant oncocytic carcinoma originating in the pancreas, an organ rarely associated with such tumours. We discuss the diagnostic journey, highlighting the tumour's resemblance to renal cell carcinoma but without renal involvement. A significant aspect of this case is the successful and sustained response to combined immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, demonstrating a potential therapeutic pathway for similar rare cases. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of pancreatic oncocytic tumours and their management.

Scars Run Deep: Problematic Morphology and Immunoprofile of Scars in Renal Oncocytomas

In some instances, the central scar of renal oncocytoma can demonstrate entrapped cells with unusual morphology and aberrant immunoprofile creating potential diagnostic confusion. Herein, 100 renal oncocytomas containing scars with embedded epithelial cells were identified from 6 institutions, including nephrectomies (64% partial, 36% radical) of similar laterality (left = 51%) and sex distribution (male = 56%), with patient ages ranging from 38 to 86 years (mean = 64.3years) and tumor sizes ranging from 2 to 16 cm (mean = 5.3 cm). Immunohistochemistry was performed on all tumors for KRT7, KIT, vimentin, and CA9 with staining intensity and extensity separately analyzed. Of 4 architectural patterns of cells within the scar, 60% showed tubular pattern. Of 4 cytologies within the scar, flat/elongated (49%) and cuboidal cells (40%) predominated. Within the scar, 62% showed eosinophilic cytoplasm, with 38% showing both cleared and eosinophilic cytoplasm; notably, 79% showed higher grade nuclei than typical oncocytes. A subset of scar cells showed mucinous-like basophilic secretions (19%). Compared to background renal oncocytoma, tumor cells within the scar were more often positive for vimentin, KRT7, and CA9 and more frequently negativity for KIT. Specifically, of the notable "aberrant" immunoprofiles, 79% showed KRT7 positivity/KIT negativity/vimentin positive, 84% showed vimentin positivity/CA9 positivity, and 78% showed KIT negativity/vimentin positivity/CA9 positivity. While encountering scars within renal oncocytomas is not uncommon, what is not well appreciated is the unique morphology and immunohistochemistry of tumor cells within the scar. Comparing tumor morphology and immunoprofile of the scar to the background oncocytoma is helpful to avoid interpretative confusion.

Metanephric adenoma in children: A case report and literature review

Metanephric adenoma (MA) is a rare type of benign renal epithelial tumor that can develop at any age. Nonetheless, MA is extremely rare in children and only a few cases have been reported to date. The present study aimed to report the case of a 5-year-old female found to have a mass in the right kidney during a routine pre-enrollment physical examination. Computed tomography (CT) images revealed multiple high-density calcifications in the mass, and contrast-enhanced CT and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated that the mass was significantly enhanced in the cortical phase and decreased in the medullary phase. Based on these findings, the mass was initially diagnosed as angiomyolipoma before surgery; however, postoperative pathology confirmed the mass to be a MA. MAs are typically a type of soft tissue mass with relatively uniform density or signal, showing delayed enhancement in contrast-enhanced scanning. However, the mass found in the present study presented diffused high-density calcification, which was obvious in the early phase of contrast-enhanced scanning but weakened in the delayed enhancement phase. In conclusion, the present case study demonstrated that MA should be considered as one of the imaging differential diagnoses of fat-poor angiomyolipoma, renal carcinoma and oncocytoma.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Virtual Biopsy of Common Solid Renal Masses-A Pictorial Review

ABSTRACT

The expanded application of radiologic imaging resulted in an increased incidence of renal masses in the recent decade. Clinically, it is difficult to determine the malignant potential of the renal masses, thus resulting in complex management. Image-guided biopsies are the ongoing standard of care to identify molecular variance but are limited by tumor accessibility and heterogeneity. With the evolving importance of individualized cancer therapies, radiomics has displayed promising results in the identification of tumoral mutation status on routine imaging. This article discusses how magnetic resonance imaging features can guide a radiologist toward identifying renal mass characteristics.

The Role of CT Imaging in Characterization of Small Renal Masses

Small renal masses (SRM) are increasingly detected incidentally during imaging. They vary widely in histology and aggressiveness, and include benign renal tumors and renal cell carcinomas that can be either indolent or aggressive. Imaging plays a key role in the characterization of these small renal masses. While a confident diagnosis can be made in many cases, some renal masses are indeterminate at imaging and can present as diagnostic dilemmas for both the radiologists and the referring clinicians. This review focuses on CT characterization of small renal masses, perhaps helping us understand small renal masses. The following aspects were considered for the review: (a) assessing the presence of fat, (b) assessing the enhancement, (c) differentiating renal tumor subtype, and (d) identifying valuable CT signs.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map-Based Texture Analysis for the Differentiation of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Oncocytoma

Preoperative imaging differentiation between ChRCC and RO is difficult with conventional subjective evaluation, and the development of quantitative analysis is a clinical challenge. Forty-nine patients underwent partial or radical nephrectomy preceded by MRI and followed by pathological diagnosis with ChRCC or RO (ChRCC: n = 41, RO: n = 8). The whole-lesion volume of interest was set on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps of 1.5T-MRI. The importance of selected texture features (TFs) was evaluated, and diagnostic models were created using random forest (RF) analysis. The Mean Decrease Gini as calculated through RF analysis was the highest for mean_ADC_value. ChRCC had a significantly lower mean_ADC_value than RO (1.26 vs. 1.79 × 10−3 mm2/s, p < 0.0001). Feature selection by the Boruta method identified the first-quartile ADC value and GLZLM_HGZE as important features. ROC curve analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the classification performances between the mean_ADC_value-only model and the Boruta model (AUC: 0.954 vs. 0.969, p = 0.236). The mean ADC value had good predictive ability for the distinction between ChRCC and RO, comparable to that of the combination of TFs optimized for the evaluated cohort. The mean ADC value may be useful in distinguishing between ChRCC and RO.

Unclassified Oncocytic Renal Neoplasm with Rib and Liver Metastases: Metastatic Oncocytoma?

Renal tumors with oncocytic or chromophobe-like morphology can be a common source of diagnostic difficulty. In some series, they constitute the largest group of unclassified renal cell carcinomas, a term used for neoplasms that do not fit the current classification of renal tumors. We describe the histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings of an eosinophilic renal neoplasm which presented with rib and liver metastases, and provide a review of the literature. The possibility of a renal oncocytoma with metastases was initially considered but excluded on the basis of several morphological and immunohistochemical features. Additionally, the tumor did not correspond with other traditional or newly emerging categories of renal neoplasms. It was therefore regarded as an unclassified oncocytic renal neoplasm which demonstrated evidence of malignant potential due to the presence of multiple metastases.

Renal Oncocytoma: The Diagnostic Challenge to Unmask the Double of Renal Cancer

Renal oncocytoma represents the most common type of benign neoplasm that is an increasing concern for urologists, oncologists, and nephrologists due to its difficult differential diagnosis and frequent overtreatment. It displays a variable neoplastic parenchymal and stromal architecture, and the defining cellular element is a large polygonal, granular, eosinophilic, mitochondria-rich cell known as an oncocyte. The real challenge in the oncocytoma treatment algorithm is related to the misdiagnosis due to its resemblance, at an initial radiological assessment, to malignant renal cancers with a completely different prognosis and medical treatment. Unfortunately, percutaneous renal biopsy is not frequently performed due to the possible side effects related to the procedure. Therefore, the majority of oncocytoma are diagnosed after the surgical operation via partial or radical nephrectomy. For this reason, new reliable strategies to solve this issue are needed. In our review, we will discuss the clinical implications of renal oncocytoma in daily clinical practice with a particular focus on the medical diagnosis and treatment and on the potential of novel promising molecular biomarkers such as circulating microRNAs to distinguish between a benign and a malignant lesion.

Renal Cell Carcinoma or Oncocytoma? The Contribution of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging to the Differential Diagnosis of Renal Masses

Background and Objectives: Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 85% and oncocytomas constitute 3–7% of solid renal masses. Oncocytomas can be confused, especially with hypovascular RCC. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and contrast-enhanced MRI sequences in the differential diagnosis of RCC and oncocytoma Materials and Methods: 465 patients with the diagnosis of RCC and 45 patients diagnosed with oncocytoma were retrospectively reviewed between 2009 to 2020. All MRI acquisitions were handled by a 1.5 T device (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) and all images were evaluated by the consensus of two radiologists with 10–15 years’ experience. The SPSS package program version 15.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the study. Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney U test or the Kruskal–Wallis tests were used in the statistical analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the cut-off values Results: The results were evaluated with a 95% confidence interval and a significance threshold of p < 0.05. ADC values (p < 0.001) and enhancement index (p < 0.01) were significantly lower in the RCC group than the oncocytoma group. Conclusion: DWI might become an alternative technique to the contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with contrast agent nephropathy or with a high risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, calculation of CI of the oncocytoma and RCCs in the contrast-enhanced acquisitions would contribute to the differential diagnosis.

Differential diagnosis of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma using CT features: a central scar-matched retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Renal oncocytoma (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) have a common cellular origin and different clinical management and prognosis.

PURPOSE

To explore the utility of computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of RO and chRCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with RO and 73 patients with chRCC presenting with the central scar were included retrospectively. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed the CT imaging features, including location, tumor size, relative density ratio, segmental enhancement inversion (SEI), necrosis, and perirenal fascia thickening, among others. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC, for continuous variables) or Kappa coefficient test (for categorical variables) was used to determine intra-observer and inter-observer bias between the two radiologists.

RESULTS

The inter- and intra-reader reproducibility of the other CT imaging parameters were nearly perfect (>0.81) except for the measurements of fat (0.662). RO differed from chRCC in the cortical or medullary side (P = 0.005), relative density ratio (P = 0.020), SEI (P < 0.001), and necrosis (P = 0.045). The logistic regression model showed that location (right kidney), hypo-density on non-enhanced CT, SEI, and perirenal fascia thickening were highly predictive of RO. The combined indicators from logistic regression model were used for ROC analysis. The area under the ROC curve was 0.923 (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the four factors combined for diagnosing RO were 88% and 86.3%, respectively. The correlation coefficient between necrosis and tumor size in all tumors including both of RO and chRCC was 0.584, indicating a positive correlation (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CT imaging features of location (right kidney), hypo-density on non-enhanced CT, SEI, and perirenal fascia thickening were valuable indicators in distinguishing RO from chRCC.

Role of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging in pre-surgical evaluation of renal masses in renal impairment patients

Background

The aim of this work is to study the role of non-contrast MRI in pre-surgical evaluation of renal masses in renal impairment patients as confirmed by both intraoperative and histopathological findings. Intraoperative and histopathological findings were correlated with radiological data.

Methods

This prospective study included 20 patients comprising 25 renal masses. The data were collected in a period from April 2018 to September 2019. All patients underwent partial or radical nephrectomy by the same surgeon.

Results

Based on MRI findings, 9 masses (36%) and 8 masses (32%) were found to be associated with collecting system invasion and perinephric fat invasion, respectively. Histopathological assessment confirmed only 6 cases (24%) with collecting system invasion and 7 cases (28%) demonstrated perinephric fat. Seven masses (28%) had intralesional hemorrhage detected by MRI and confirmed by pathological findings. The MRI detected 6 cases (24%) with lymph nodes invasion, while the histopathological assessment confirmed lymphatic invasion in 7 cases (28%). Only 2 cases (8%) had vascular invasion detected by preoperative MRI and confirmed by histopathology and surgery. The final histopathological examination confirmed 20 malignant neoplasms (80%: RCC = 18, leiomyosarcoma = 2), 3 benign neoplasms (12%: angiomyolipoma = 1, oncocytoma = 2) and 2 non-neoplastic benign masses (8%: renal abscess = 1, xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis = 1).

Conclusion

Non-contrast MRI is a crucial imaging tool in renal impairment patients who cannot be examined with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. It assesses the extent of the renal sinus fat and the perinephric fat invasion.

Kidney tumor diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging derived ADC histogram parameters combined with patient characteristics and tumor volume to discriminate oncocytoma from renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the ability to discriminate oncocytoma from RCC based on a model using whole tumor ADC histogram parameters with additional use of tumor volume and patient characteristics.

METHOD

In this prospective study, 39 patients (mean age 65 years, range 28-79; 9/39 (23%) female) with 39 renal tumors (32/39 (82%) RCC and 7/39 (18%) oncocytoma) underwent multiparametric MRI between November 2014 and June 2018. Two regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn to cover both the entire tumor volume and a part of healthy renal cortex. ROI ADC maps were calculated using a mono-exponential model and ADC histogram distribution parameters were calculated. A logistic regression model was created using ADC histogram parameters, radiographic and patient characteristics that were significantly different between oncocytoma and RCC. A ROC curve of the model was constructed and the AUC, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Furthermore, differences in intra-patient ADC histogram parameters between renal tumor and healthy cortex were calculated. A separate ROC curve was constructed to differentiate oncocytoma from RCC using statistically significant intra-patient parameter differences.

RESULTS

ADC standard deviation (p = 0.008), entropy (p = 0.010), tumor volume (p = 0.012), and patient sex (p = 0.018) were significantly different between RCC and oncocytoma. The regression model of these parameters combined had an ROC-AUC of 0.91 with a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 84%. Intra-patient difference in ADC 25th percentile (p < 0.01) and entropy (p = 0.030) combined had a ROC-AUC of 0.86 with a sensitivity and specificity of 86%, and 81%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A model combining ADC standard deviation and entropy with tumor volume and patient sex has the highest diagnostic value for discrimination of oncocytoma. Although less accurate, intra-patient difference in ADC 25th percentile and entropy between renal tumor and healthy cortex can also be used. Although the results of this preliminary study do not yet justify clinical use of the model, it does stimulate further research using whole tumor ADC histogram parameters.

A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of small masses (< 4 cm) of renal oncocytoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Renal oncocytoma (RO) is the most commonly resected benign renal tumor because of misdiagnosis as renal cell carcinoma. This misdiagnosis is generally owing to overlapping imaging features. This study describes the building of a radiomics nomogram based on clinical data and radiomics signature for the preoperative differentiation of RO from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) on tri-phasic contrast-enhanced CT.

METHODS

A total of 122 patients (85 in training set and 37 in external validation set) with ROs (n = 46) or ccRCCs (n = 76) were enrolled. Patient characteristics and tri-phasic contrast-enhanced CT imaging features were evaluated to build a clinical factors model. A radiomics signature was constructed by extracting radiomics features from tri-phasic contrast-enhanced CT images and a radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated. A radiomics nomogram was then built by incorporating the Rad-score and significant clinical factors according to a multivariate logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of the above three models was evaluated in training and validation sets.

RESULTS

Central stellate area and perirenal fascia thickening were selected to build the clinical factors model. Eleven radiomics features were combined to construct the radiomics signature. The AUCs of the radiomics nomogram, which was based on the selected clinical factors and Rad-score, were 0.960 and 0.898 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The decision curves of the radiomics nomogram and radiomics signature in the validation set indicated an overall net benefit over the clinical factors model.

CONCLUSION

Our radiomics nomogram can effectively predict the preoperative diagnosis of ROs and may therefore be of assistance in sparing unnecessary surgery and tailoring precise therapy. The ROC curves of the clinical model, the radiomics signature and the radiomics nomogram for the validation set. RO = Renal oncocytoma; ccRCC = Clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Renal Oncocytoma With Both Lymphovascular Invasion and Prominent Intracytoplasmic Vacuole-Like Spaces: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Here we report a case of renal oncocytoma in a 68 year-old male. The diagnosis was initially made on a needle biopsy 6 years prior to the partial nephrectomy. The case is unique that in addition to the gross and microscopic features commonly seen in renal oncocytomas, both lymphovascular invasion and prominent intracytoplasmic vacuole-like spaces are also present in this tumor. Although vascular invasion is increasingly recognized as compatible with renal oncocytoma, intracytoplasmic vacuoles are a rare and unusual finding that may lead to diagnostic difficulty. The diagnosis of renal oncocytoma was confirmed after immunohistochemistry was performed to argue against succinate dehydrogenase deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and chromophobe RCC. This case highlights the importance for practicing pathologists to recognize the rare co-occurrence of lymphovascular invasion and large intracytoplasmic vacuole-like spaces in renal oncocytoma. Other differential diagnoses may include emerging renal tumor entities, such as the recently-proposed eosinophilic vacuolated tumor.

New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) reviewed recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, to provide an update on existing entities, including diagnostic criteria, molecular correlates, and updated nomenclature. Key prognostic features for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain WHO/ISUP grade, AJCC/pTNM stage, coagulative necrosis, and rhabdoid and sarcomatoid differentiation. Accrual of subclonal genetic alterations in clear cell RCC including SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, loss of chromosome 14q and 9p are associated with variable prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and vulnerability to therapies. Recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines increasingly adopt immunotherapeutic agents in advanced RCC, including RCC with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid changes. Papillary RCC subtyping is no longer recommended, as WHO/ISUP grade and tumor architecture better predict outcome. New papillary RCC variants/patterns include biphasic, solid, Warthin-like, and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. For tumors with 'borderline' features between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, a term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified" is proposed. Clear cell papillary RCC may warrant reclassification as a tumor of low malignant potential. Tubulocystic RCC should only be diagnosed when morphologically pure. MiTF family translocation RCCs exhibit varied morphologic patterns and fusion partners. TFEB-amplified RCC occurs in older patients and is associated with more aggressive behavior. Acquired cystic disease (ACD) RCC-like cysts are likely precursors of ACD-RCC. The diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma requires a negative SMARCB1 (INI-1) expression and sickle cell trait/disease. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) can be distinguished from papillary RCC with overlapping morphology by losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22. MTSCC with adverse histologic features shows frequent CDKN2A/2B (9p) deletions. BRAF mutations unify the metanephric family of tumors. The term "fumarate hydratase deficient RCC" ("FH-deficient RCC") is preferred over "hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome-associated RCC". A low threshold for FH, 2SC, and SDHB immunohistochemistry is recommended in difficult to classify RCCs, particularly those with eosinophilic morphology, occurring in younger patients. Current evidence does not support existence of a unique tumor subtype occurring after chemotherapy/radiation in early childhood.

Low-grade oncocytic tumour expands the spectrum of renal oncocytic tumours and deserves separate classification: a review of 23 cases from a single tertiary institute

AIMS

Low-grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) has recently been introduced as a potential distinct entity.

METHODS

At the Indiana University department of pathology, primary renal epithelial neoplasms between 2005 and 2020 were searched after appropriate institutional review board permissions.

RESULTS

Twenty-three cases (male/female ratio 14/9) with a median age of 66 (23-84 years) were identified. The majority of patients underwent partial nephrectomy (15/23, 65%), with a median tumour size of 4.0 cm (2.2-10.5 cm). Only one case had infiltration beyond the kidney (perinephric fat). Solid/diffuse proliferation of tightly packed oncocytic tumour cells and occasional tubule formations, with an abrupt edematous change in the stroma with loosely connected small clusters of tumour cells. Along with diffuse CK7 expression with lack of CD117 in all cases, vimentin was positive in 8/23 cases (35%, 5 focal). CD10 was expressed in 6/13 (46%, 4 focal). Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase (AMACR) was positive in 5/8 (63%) cases. Focal but intense cytoplasmic colloidal iron stain was present in 3/20 (15%) cases. Luminal or cytoplasmic/perinuclear precipitation was observed in 8/20 (40%) cases. Succinate Dehydrogenase B (SDHB) was performed in 6 cases, with all retained expression.

CONCLUSIONS

LOT is a clinically indolent and potentially benign entity with distinguishable morphology and immunohistochemical profile that can be performed and be easily interpreted in most of surgical pathology settings. Additional studies with larger cohorts, comprehensive molecular evaluation and longer follow-up are needed to definitively recognise these tumours as a separate entity and to further address the possibility of active surveillance options in eligible patients.

The Incidental Renal Mass- Update on Characterization and Management

Renal masses are commonly encountered on cross-sectional imaging examinations performed for nonrenal indications. Although most can be dismissed as benign cysts, a subset will be either indeterminate or suspicious; in many cases, imaging cannot be used to reliably differentiate between benign and malignant masses. On-going research in defining characteristics of common renal masses on advanced imaging shows promise in offering solutions to this issue. A recent update of the Bosniak classification (used to categorize cystic renal masses) was proposed with the goals of decreasing imaging follow-up in likely benign cystic masses, and therefore avoiding unnecessary surgical resection of such masses.

Renal leiomyoma: a case report and literature review

Background

Renal leiomyomas are exceptionally rare, benign, mesenchymal tumours originating from smooth muscle in the kidney. Historically, because of their small size, most renal leiomyoma cases were discovered incidentally based on autopsy findings. However, since the advent and improved access to imaging modalities such as ultrasound and computed tomography (CT), renal leiomyomas are being discovered more frequently. Although usually incidental discoveries, clinical presenting signs and symptoms comprise abdominal or flank pain, a palpable flank mass, and haematuria in 20% of those with symptoms.

Case presentation

We study the case of an incidentally found, asymptomatic, left kidney mass that presented in a 60-year-old female. Initial suspicions on CT imaging of either renal cell carcinoma or oncocytoma resulted in a radical nephrectomy of the left kidney. Postoperative pathological examination of the mass revealed a renal leiomyoma; a rare, benign tumour that is mostly indistinguishable from malignant tumours on imaging.

Conclusions

With the current availability of ultrasonography and CT, they are often discovered incidentally, and the radiological differential diagnoses are often inadequate or challenging in such cases. The gold standard management of these suspicious cancer cases is still a radical nephrectomy with postoperative pathological and immunohistochemical analysis. Due to its benign nature, patients enjoy excellent prognoses without recurrence. We discuss and briefly review the relevant literature of the clinical, imaging and pathological features of renal leiomyomas and those of the differential diagnoses.

Imaging Characterization of Renal Masses

The detection of a renal mass is a relatively frequent occurrence in the daily practice of any Radiology Department. The diagnostic approaches depend on whether the lesion is cystic or solid. Cystic lesions can be managed using the Bosniak classification, while management of solid lesions depends on whether the lesion is well-defined or infiltrative. The approach to well-defined lesions focuses mainly on the differentiation between renal cancer and benign tumors such as angiomyolipoma (AML) and oncocytoma. Differential diagnosis of infiltrative lesions is wider, including primary and secondary malignancies and inflammatory disease, and knowledge of the patient history is essential. Radiologists may establish a possible differential diagnosis based on the imaging features of the renal masses and the clinical history. The aim of this review is to present the contribution of the different imaging techniques and image guided biopsies in the diagnostic management of cystic and solid renal lesions.

Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: from simple hamartoma to complex tumour

Angiomyolipoma is the most common mesenchymal tumour of the kidney, even if for a long time it has been viewed as a hamartoma rather than a neoplasm. It belongs to a family of neoplasms, named PEComa, characterised by the constant presence of perivascular epithelioid cells that co-express smooth muscle and melanogenesis markers. Angiomyolipoma can occur in patients with tuberous sclerosis, a hereditary syndrome due to the alteration of TSC1 or TSC2 genes, or sporadically. Angiomyolipoma and its variants are indolent tumours; however, some epithelioid angiomyolipomas/pure epithelioid PEComas are aggressive, and criteria for malignancy have been proposed to identify those cases. Although typical angiomyolipoma is a straightforward diagnosis, pathologists should be aware of the wide morphological spectrum of its variants which could be tricky in routine clinical practice and could require immunohistochemical analysis for resolution. The differential diagnosis may range from an inflammatory process (for instance xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis) to the most common renal cancers and sarcomas. The immunoexpression of melanogenesis markers (HMB45 and Melan-A) and cathepsin K is extremely helpful in the majority of cases. Recently, a subset of epithelioid angiomyolipoma/pure epithelioid PEComa harbouring TFE3 gene fusions has been described, raising questions about its relationship with the family of perivascular epithelioid cell tumour. The activation of the mTOR pathway due to genetic alterations of tuberous sclerosis complex in TSC1 or TSC2 genes in angiomyolipoma has also been reported as well as the subsequent therapeutic implications.

Hyalinized stroma is a characteristic feature of pancreatic intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm: An immunohistochemical study

Hyalinized stroma (HS) is a dense, eosinophilic, and amorphous extracellular material in the stroma. HS is observed in several tumors; however, it has not been comprehensively studied in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) or intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm (IOPN). Here, we aimed to evaluate the immunohistochemical and microscopic characteristics of HS in IPMN and IOPN. The prevalence of HS was determined in 168 cases of IPMN, including intestinal type (IPMN-I), gastric type (IPMN-G), and pancreatobiliary type (IPMN-PB), as well as in 11 cases of IOPN. Immunohistochemical staining for laminin and collagen (types I, II, III, IV, and V), as well as Congo red staining were performed in IPMN and IOPN cases containing HS. The prevalence of HS among the IPMN and IOPN specimens was 1.2% (2/168 cases) and 45.5% (5/11 cases), respectively. The prevalence rates of HS in each IPMN subtype were as follows: 2.2% (2/91 cases) in IPMN-G, and 0% in IPMN-PB and IPMN-I. All seven HS cases were positive for collagen I, III, IV, and V but were negative for Congo red staining. Most cases showed negative, focal, or weak expression of laminin and type II collagen. These findings indicate that HS is associated with IOPN and is primarily composed of collagen fibers.

Distinguishing Benign Renal Tumors with an Oncocytic Gene Expression (ONEX) Classifier

Renal oncocytoma (RO) accounts for 5% of renal cancers and generally behaves as a benign tumor with favorable long-term prognosis. It is difficult to confidently distinguish between benign RO and other renal malignancies, particularly chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). Therefore, RO is often managed aggressively with surgery. We sought to identify molecular biomarkers to distinguish RO from chRCC and other malignant renal cancer mimics. In a 44-patient discovery cohort, we identified a significant differential abundance of nine genes in RO relative to chRCC. These genes were used to train a classifier to distinguish RO from chRCC in an independent 57-patient cohort. The trained classifier was then validated in five independent cohorts comprising 89 total patients. This nine-gene classifier trained on the basis of differential gene expression showed 93% sensitivity and 98% specificity for distinguishing RO from chRCC across the pooled validation cohorts, with a c-statistic of 0.978. This tool may be a useful adjunct to other diagnostic modalities to decrease the diagnostic and management uncertainty associated with small renal masses and to enable clinicians to recommend more confidently less aggressive management for some tumors. PATIENT SUMMARY: Renal oncocytoma is generally a benign form of kidney cancer that does not necessarily require surgical removal. However, it is difficult to distinguish renal oncocytoma from other more aggressive forms of kidney cancer, so it is treated most commonly with surgery. We built a classification tool based on the RNA levels of nine genes that may help avoid these surgeries by reliably distinguishing renal oncocytoma from other forms of kidney cancer.

Renal Cell Tumors: Molecular Findings Reshaping Clinico-pathological Practice

Over the past 20 years, the number of subtypes of renal epithelial cell neoplasia has grown. This growth has resulted from detailed histological and immunohistochemical characterization of these tumors and their correlation with clinical outcomes. Distinctive molecular phenotypes have validated the unique nature of many of these tumors. This growth of unique renal neoplasms has continued after the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours. A consequence is that both the pathologists who diagnose the tumors and the clinicians who care for these patients are confronted with a bewildering array of renal cell carcinoma variants. Many of these variants have important clinical features, i.e. familial or syndromic associations, genomics alterations that can be targeted with systemic therapy, and benignancy of tumors previously classified as carcinomas. Our goal in the review is to provide a practical guide to help recognize these variants, based on small and distinct sets of histological features and limited numbers of immunohistochemical stains, supplemented, as necessary, with molecular features.

[Evolution of followed renal oncocytomas]

INTRODUCTION

Oncocytomas are primitive kidney tumours, considered benign but their evolution is not fully established. The local progression is generally admitted but few data explain what makes a oncocytoma to grow more or less quickly. The objective of our study is to analyse the evolution of followed renal oncocytomas after histologic confirmation and to identify factors that can influence their growth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study in two centers (North Hospital and Hospital of the Conception of Marseille). All patients with renal oncocytoma diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy from September 2010 to April 2016 and followed for more than one year were included. Epidemiological, histological, and morphological data were collected at diagnosis, during follow-up and in case of strategy change (intervention). Statistical analysis of factors influencing oncocytomes growth was based on the Pearson correlation test.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were included. The median age for diagnosis was 65 years [39-85]. The sex ratio H/F was 6/5. The median follow-up was 34 months [12-180]. The average diagnosis size was 29 mm [12-90]. Thirteen patients (25%) were treated secondarily, including 70% by conservative treatment. The average growth was 0.25 (±0.23) cm/yr. The patients treated were younger and had a higher growth rate than the untreated (0.48±0.23cm/yr versus 0.18±0.18cm/yr, P<0,001). According to Pearson's analysis, there was a positive linear relationship (R=0.27, P=0.047) between velocity and initial size and a negative linear relationship (ρ=-0.44, P<0.001) between velocity and age at diagnosis. So tumor growth was faster if the patients were young and the tumor voluminous at diagnosis.

DISCUSSION

Rapid growth often leads to a cessation of surveillance in favour of an intervention strategy. For young patients, conservative treatment (partiel nephrectomy or ablative treatment) in the medium term is likely to be preferred, but for elderly patients or with important comorbidities follow-up is an alternative to an invasive attitude.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Single-center study: the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessing renal oncocytoma

Purpose: The aim of the present retrospective single-center study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of renal oncocytoma.Method: Thirteen patients with histopathologically confirmed renal oncocytoma and 26 patients with histopathologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma were included in this retrospective single-center study on whom CEUS was performed between 2005 and 2015. The applied contrast agent was a second-generation blood pool agent. CEUS examinations were performed and interpreted by a single radiologist with more than 15 years of experience (EFSUMB Level 3).Results: CEUS examinations were successfully performed in all included patients without any adverse effects. Renal oncocytomas showed varying echogenicity (46% hypoechoic, 23% hyperechoic, 8% iso-/hyperechoic, 8% isoechoic). In two cases renal oncocytoma only demarcated upon i.v. application of contrast medium. In bilateral oncocytosis, lesions presented as hyperechoic. Only 23% of renal oncocytomas showed slight vascularization using Color Doppler. No oncocytoma-specific pattern of microperfusion could be elucidated: 85% of the oncocytomas presented hyperenhancing, of whom 50% also showed delayed venous wash-out; 8% of renal oncocytomas showed venous wash-out without early arterial hyperenhancement.Conclusions: Within the frame of the present study and in line with the recent state of knowledge, no specific sonomorphological feature - including CEUS - could be detected allowing for adequate discrimination between oncocytoma and renal cell carcinoma.

Diagnostic test accuracy of ADC values for identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of renal tumor subtypes and meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of ADC for differentiation of localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other renal tumor types.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published until May 1, 2019, that reported ADC values of renal tumors. Methodological quality was evaluated. For the meta-analysis on diagnostic test accuracy of ADC for differentiation of ccRCC from other renal lesions, we applied a bivariate random-effects model and compared two subgroups of ADC measurement with vs. without cystic and necrotic areas.

RESULTS

We included 48 studies (2588 lesions) in the systematic review and 13 studies (1126 lesions) in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in ADC of renal parenchyma using b values of 0-800 vs. 0-1000 (p = 0.08). ADC measured on selected portions (sADC) excluding cystic and necrotic areas differed significantly from whole-lesion ADC (wADC) (p = 0.002). Compared to ccRCC, minimal-fat angiomyolipoma, papillary RCC, and chromophobe RCC showed significantly lower sADC while oncocytoma exhibited higher sADC. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity to differentiate ccRCC from other tumors were 80% (95% CI, 0.76-0.88) and 78% (95% CI, 0.64-0.89), respectively, for sADC and 77% (95% CI, 0.59-0.90) and 77% (95% CI, 0.69-0.86) for wADC. sADC offered a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than wADC (0.852 vs. 0.785, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values of kidney tumors that exclude cystic or necrotic areas more accurately differentiate ccRCC from other renal tumor types than whole-lesion ADC values.

KEY POINTS

• Selective ADC of renal tumors, excluding cystic and necrotic areas, provides better discriminatory ability than whole-lesion ADC to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.852 vs. 0.785, respectively (p = 0.02). • Selective ADC of renal masses provides moderate sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 78%, respectively, for differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, oncocytoma, and minimal-fat angiomyolipoma. • Selective ADC excluding cystic and necrotic areas are preferable to whole-lesion ADC as an additional tool to multiphasic MRI to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions whether the highest b value is 800 or 1000.

Percutaneous application of fibrin sealant in surgically recalcitrant urinomas following oncocytoma resection

Surgical application of fibrin sealant is well established as a hemostatic agent. However, reports of its percutaneous application and its uses within the urinary tract are limited. Presented below are two patients with recalcitrant urinomas despite diversion therapy following partial nephrectomy for oncocytomas. Both patients were successfully treated with percutaneous application of fibrin sealant via a sheath at the time of percutaneous perinephric drain removal. Follow-up imaging demonstrated resolution of the urinomas with stabilization of creatinine. Percutaneous application of fibrin sealant may be considered as an alternative treatment for recalcitrant urinomas prior to surgical intervention, though more studies are required to confirm its effectiveness and safety.

Cytogenetic analysis of 130 renal oncocytomas identify three distinct and mutually exclusive diagnostic classes of chromosome aberrations

The cytogenetic alterations in renal oncocytoma (RO) are poorly understood. We analyzed 130 consecutive RO for karyotypic alterations. Clonal chromosome abnormalities were identified in 63 (49%) cases, which could be categorized into three classes of mutually exclusive cytogenetic categories. Class 1 (N = 20) RO had diploid karyotypes with characteristic 11q13 rearrangement in balanced translocations with 10 or more different chromosome partners in all cases. We identified recurrent translocation partners at 5q35, 6p21, 9p24, 11p13-14, and 11q23, and confirmed that CCND1 gene rearrangement at 11q13 utilizing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Class 2 RO (N = 25) exhibited hypodiploid karyotypes with loss of chromosome 1 and/or losses of Y in males and X in females in all cases. The class 3 tumors comprising of 18 cases showed diverse types of abnormalities with the involvement of two or more chromosomes exclusive of abnormalities seen in classes 1 and 2 tumors. Furthermore, karyotypically uninformative cases were subjected to FISH analysis to identify classes 1 and 2 abnormalities. In this group, we found similar frequencies of CCND1 rearrangement, loss of chromosome 1 or Y as with karyotypically abnormal cases. We validated our results against 91 tumors from the Mitelman database. Correlation of clinical data with all the three classes of ROs showed no clear evidence of overall patient survival. Our findings support the hypothesis that RO exhibit three principal cytogenetic categories, which may have different roles in initiation and/or progression. These cytogenetic markers provide a key tool in the diagnostic evaluation of RO.

Palpable Abdominal Mass is a Renal Oncocytoma: Not All Large Renal Masses are Malignant

A 59-year-old woman presented with abdominal pain and a palpable abdominal mass. Initial imaging revealed a 14cm solid, enhancing renal mass and suspicion for liver and bone metastases. Family history included a brother with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and mother with glioblastoma multiforme. After liver biopsy was inconclusive, she underwent radical nephrectomy with final pathologic diagnosis of oncocytoma. Renal oncocytoma is the most common benign renal tumor but remains difficult to distinguish clinically and radiographically from renal cell carcinoma. Should urologists use renal mass biopsy even more frequently prior to surgical intervention?

A Case of Renal Oncocytoma with Renal Venous Tumor Thrombus

Renal oncocytoma is generally regarded as a benign renal tumor. We herein report a case of large renal oncocytoma with renal venous tumor thrombus. The patient may need to be carefully followed up because hematogenous metastasis may occur.

Liver Metastases From Renal Oncocytoma With Vascular Extension

The 2016 World Health Organization Renal Tumor Classification defines renal oncocytoma (RO) as a benign epithelial tumor; however, malignant histopathologic features have been documented. Rare cases with metastases have been reported. We describe the case of a 62-year-old woman who was referred to the Urology Clinic for a routine work-up. Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography showed a 7-cm mass in the middle and lower portions of the left kidney and 2 suspected liver metastases. The patient underwent surgery. Microscopically both renal and liver lesions presented solid, solid-nested, and microcystic architecture, composed predominantly of large eosinophilic cells without any worrisome pattern except the vascular extension. The cells were positive for S100A1, CD117, and PAX-8 and negative for CAIX, CK7, and AMACR. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed a disomic profile for the chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 7, 10, 17. No mutation of coding sequence of the SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, VHL, and BHD genes and no loss of heterozygosity at 3p were found. The final diagnosis was "RO" according to the 2016 World Health Organization Renal Tumor Classification with "liver metastases." This report provides a wide clinical-pathologic, immunophenotypical and molecular documentation of a RO with liver metastases.

Renal Oncocytoma and Retroperitoneal Ancient Schwannoma: A Benign Mimic of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal oncocytomas and retroperitoneal schwannomas are rare and typically benign tumors with characteristic histopathologic features. Ideal management of both renal oncocytoma and retroperitoneal schwannoma is surgical resection. We present a rare case of a 63-year-old man with multifocal renal oncocytoma and retroperitoneal ancient schwannoma which, preoperatively, masqueraded as metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Both tumors were successfully resected surgically. Immunochemistry and histopathology confirmed each diagnosis.

Cystic renal oncocytoma mimicking renal cell carcinoma

Cystic renal lesions are one of the commonly encountered urological conditions. They can be either benign or malignant. The Bosniak classification is employed to differentiate benign cysts from the malignant ones and to recommend treatment options. Bosniak type 4 cysts are mostly malignant. Rarely, benign tumors can be encountered in Bosniak type 4 cysts. We present a 59-year-old female who presented with a hilar Bosniak type 4 cyst in the right kidney. She underwent open exploration of the right renal tumor. The tumor was infiltrating into the renal vessels and could not be separated from the renal vein. In view of preoperative and intraoperative suspicion of malignancy, radical nephrectomy was done. Postoperative histopathological examination revealed the tumor to be an oncocytoma. The benign nature of the cyst could not be conclusively determined by preoperative investigations and intraoperative findings. Postoperative histological examination uncovered the rare cystic presentation of this benign tumor.

Renal oncocytoma with vascular and perinephric fat invasion

Renal oncocytoma is a benign epithelial neoplasm typically composed of large cells with granular eosinophilic cytoplasm. Although rare, histologically worrisome features such as vascular and perinephric fat invasion have been reported. Of the 159 renal oncocytomas resected at our institution, 20 (12.6%) had vascular and/or perinephric fat invasion. Microscopically, 10 oncocytomas had perinephric fat invasion, 7 had vascular invasion and 3 had both vascular and perinephric fat invasion. Grossly, perinephric fat invasion was visible in three cases and tumour was identified within the branches of the renal vein in two cases. Tumours occurred in 14 men and 6 women (M:F = 2.3:1). The mean age at diagnosis was 64.5 years (range, 33-88 years). A total of 11 cases had radical nephrectomies while 9 cases had partial nephrectomies. There was no evidence of disease recurrence, metastasis or death due to tumour after a mean follow up of 25.6 months (range, 2-103 months). The presence of vascular and perinephric fat invasion in renal oncocytoma though worrisome, does not alter the benign course of the tumour.

Imaging Advances in the Management of Kidney Cancer

New developments in cross-sectional imaging, including contrast-enhanced ultrasound, dual-energy computed tomography, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography, and positron emission tomography, together with novel application of existing and novel radiotracers, have changed the landscape of renal mass characterization (ie, virtual biopsy) as well as the detection of metastatic disease, prognostication, and response assessment in patients with advanced kidney cancer. A host of imaging response criteria have been developed to characterize the response to targeted and immune therapies and correlate with patient outcomes, each with strengths and limitations. Recent efforts to advance the field are aimed at increasing objectivity with quantitative techniques and the use of banks of imaging data to match the vast genomic data that are becoming available. The emerging field of radiogenomics has the potential to transform further the role of imaging in kidney cancer management through eventual noninvasive characterization of the tumor histology and genetic microenvironment in single renal masses and/or metastatic disease. We review of the effect of currently available imaging techniques in the management of patients with kidney cancer, including localized, locally advanced, and metastatic disease.

Thyroid and renal tumors in patients treated with long-term lithium: case series from a lithium clinic, review of the literature and international pharmacovigilance reports

BACKGROUND

Cancer had never been considered as a relevant problem in patients treated with lithium until 2015, when a document published by the European Medicine Agency concluded that long-term use of lithium might induce renal tumors. A few months later, we observed the case of a woman treated with lithium for 18 years who was diagnosed with both thyroid and renal tumors.

METHODS

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between lithium treatment and thyroid or renal tumors. We analyzed clinical records in our lithium clinic database, causes of death of patients who had been visited at least once at the lithium clinic, reports of lithium adverse reactions in the European and WHO pharmacovigilance databases, and published cases of thyroid and renal tumors in long-term lithium-treated patients.

RESULTS

Of the 1871 lithium patients who had been visited at least once between 1980 and 2013, eight had been diagnosed with thyroid papillary carcinoma and two with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. No cases of thyroid cancer and only one case of renal tumor were the cause of death according to the 375 available death certificates. VigiAccess database contained a total of 29 and 14 cases of renal and thyroid tumors, respectively. EudraVigilance database contained 21 cases of renal and 8 of thyroid neoplasms. Literature search yielded 6 published cases of thyroid papillary carcinoma and 25 cases of various renal tumors. However, two population-based studies did not find any increased risks of cancer in patients exposed to lithium, whereas two nationwide studies did not find any excess of renal tumors.

CONCLUSION

So far it has not been possible epidemiologically to confirm an increased risk of thyroid or renal cancers associated with lithium. Such a conclusion is supported by the findings of low rates and mortalities of thyroid or renal cancers from the present lithium clinic data.

Oncocytoma managed by active surveillance in a transplant allograft kidney: a case report

BACKGROUND

The ethical implications of the utilization of kidneys with solid renal masses (SRMs) in transplantation are the subject of lively debate in the transplantation community and beyond. One of such implications is that as the life expectancy of renal transplant patients improve, the prevalence of SRMs in donors is likely to increase. We report a case of an oncocytoma in a renal allograft complicating a deceased-donor kidney transplant.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 60-year-old woman received and underwent deceased-donor renal transplantation for end-stage renal disease after a waiting-list period of 11 years. Kidney Doppler ultrasound (DUS) of the deceased donor was negative for any nodular lesion. The finding of the DUS, done on postoperative day 1, to assess the patency of the graft, was suspicious for an acute arterial thrombosis but did not reveal any focal irregularities. An ensuing computed tomography (CT) scan did not show any arterial complications but serendipitously revealed a 2.4-cm lesion on the upper pole of the renal allograft, which was not detected during the back-table or ultrasonography monitoring. Histology of the biopsied lesion was consistent with oncocytoma. However, because the eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma may morphologically resemble renal oncocytoma, immunohistochemical staining was performed. The results were negative, ruling out chromophobe RCC. After discussing the therapeutic options and potential related outcomes with the patient, we found no reason for resection of the lesion or an allograft nephrectomy, given the low risk of malignant transformation in an oncocytoma. Active surveillance of the benign tumor was done with ultrasonography, every 2 months, for the first year and, then, with magnetic resonance imaging, every year. The patient received mycophenolate-mofetil, tacrolimus, and prednisone throughout the 5-year follow-up period, and the regimen for immunosuppression was not changed despite the presence of the renal mass. After 60 months, we report that none of the radiological findings have shown any morphological changes of the lesion, and the patient is well.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of an oncocytoma in a renal allograft complicating a deceased-donor kidney transplant, which was successfully managed by active surveillance.

Imaging of Solid Renal Masses

The increase in serendipitous detection of solid renal masses on imaging has not resulted in a reduction in mortality from renal cell carcinoma. Consequently, efforts for improved lesion characterization have been pursued and incorporated into management algorithms for distinguishing clinically significant tumors from those with favorable histology or benign conditions. Although diagnostic imaging strategies have evolved for optimized lesion detection, distinction between benign tumors and both indolent and aggressive malignant neoplasms remain an important diagnostic challenge. Recent advances in cross-sectional imaging have expanded the role of these tests in the noninvasive characterization of solid renal tumors.