Inert gas exchange during pneumoperitoneum at incremental values of positive end-expiratory pressure

Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Increased intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic surgery causes cephalad displacement of the diaphragm, resulting in the formation of atelectasis, which can be overcome by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the level of optimal PEEP to maintain adequate arterial oxygenation and hemodynamics during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP).

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing RLRP were randomly allocated to one of five groups (n = 20) (0, 3, 5, 7 and 10 cmH2O of PEEP). Hemodynamic variables and respiratory parameters were measured at baseline with the patient in the supine position; at 30 min, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h during CO2 insufflation with the patient in the post-Trendelenburg position; and after deflation in the supine position with increasing PEEP.

RESULTS

The PaO2 levels and alveolar-arterial difference in oxygen tension (AaDO2) were improved in patients with PEEPs compared with patients in whom PEEP was not used. The application of PEEP (10 cmH2O) resulted in higher PaO2 levels compared to those with lower PEEP levels, but excessive peak airway pressure (PAP) was sometimes observed. The application of a PEEP of 7 cmH2O resulted in similar PaO2 levels without causing excessive PAP. There was a significant difference in central venous pressure between the groups, but there were no significant differences in heart rate, mean arterial pressure or minute ventilation between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A PEEP of 7 cmH2O is associated with the greater improvement of PaO2 and AaDO2 without causing excessive PAP during RLRP.

Positive end-expiratory pressure in pressure-controlled ventilation improves ventilatory and oxygenation parameters during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

During laparoscopy, pneumoperitoneum may result in intraoperative atelectasis, which impairs normal gas exchange. This study investigated whether positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH(2)O in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) mode can improve ventilatory and oxygenation parameters during pneumoperitoneum.

METHODS

Thirty patients, aged 18-65 years, undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to the ZEEP (PEEP = 0 cmH(2)O) or PEEP (PEEP = 5 cmH(2)O) group. PCV was started after induction of anesthesia. Apart from PEEP level, all other ventilator settings were identical for both groups. Peak airway pressure was set at induction and reset after pneumoperitoneum to deliver tidal volume of 8 ml/kg in both groups. Hemodynamic, ventilatory, and oxygenation parameters were measured after induction of anesthesia (T1) and 30 min after pneumoperitoneum (T2).

RESULTS

Oxygenation index (PaO(2)/FiO(2)) was significantly higher in the PEEP group than in the ZEEP group at T2 (P = 0.031). In both groups, dynamic compliance significantly decreased over 40 min from T1 to T2. There were no significant differences in hemodynamics between the two groups during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Application of PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O should be considered in PCV during laparoscopic surgeries to decrease intraoperative atelectasis caused by pneumoperitoneum to improve gas exchange and oxygenation.

Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic procedures are increasing in number and extensiveness. Many patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery have coexisting disease. Especially in patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidity, pneumoperitoneum and positioning can be deleterious. This article reviews possible pitfalls related to the combination of anesthesia, positioning of the patient, and the influence of pneumoperitoneum in the course of laparoscopic interventions.

METHODS

A literature search using Medline's MESH terms was used to identify recent key articles. Cross-references from these articles were used as well.

RESULTS

Patient positioning and pneumoperitoneum can induce hemodynamic, pulmonary, renal, splanchnic, and endocrine pathophysiological changes, which will affect the entire perioperative period of patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative management for the estimation and reduction of risk of morbidity and mortality due to surgery and anesthesia in laparoscopic procedures must be based on knowledge of the pathophysiological disturbances induced by the combination of general anesthesia, pneumoperitoneum, and positioning of the patient.

Positive end-expiratory pressure improves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery usually requires the use of a pneumoperitoneum by insufflating gas in the peritoneal space. The gas most commonly used for insufflation is carbon dioxide. Increased intra-abdominal pressure causes cephalad displacement of the diaphragm resulting in compressed lung areas, which leads to formation of atelectasis, especially during mechanical ventilation. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the effect of prolonged intraperitoneal gas insufflation on arterial oxygenation and hemodynamics during mechanical ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).

METHODS

Twenty patients undergoing totally endoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the PEEP group (n = 10) a constant PEEP of 5 cmH(2)O was used, whereas in the ZPEEP group (n = 10) no PEEP was used.

RESULTS

Application of PEEP (5 cmH(2)O) resulted in significantly higher P(a)O(2) levels after 3 h (182 +/- 49 vs. 224 +/- 35 mmHg) and 4 h (179 +/- 48 vs. 229 +/- 29 mmHg) of pneumoperitoneum; after desufflation, P(a)O(2) values decreased significantly below preinsufflation values. While there were no significant differences in heart rate, central venous pressure (CVP) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) during pneumoperitoneum between both groups, baseline values in CVP and MAP differed significantly between both groups with higher levels in the ZPEEP group.

CONCLUSION

The application of a constant positive airway pressure of 5 cmH(2)O preserves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum.

Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation

BACKGROUND

Although providing excellent outcome results, laparoscopy also induces particular pathophysiological changes in response to pneumoperitoneum. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of a CO(2) pneumoperitoneum can help minimize complications while profiting from the benefits of laparoscopic surgery without concerns about its safety.

METHODS

A review of articles on the pathophysiological changes and complications of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum as well as prevention and treatment of these complications was performed using the Medline database.

RESULTS

The main pathophysiological changes during CO(2) pneumoperitoneum refer to the cardiovascular system and are mainly correlated with the amount of intra-abdominal pressure in combination with the patient's position on the operating table. These changes are well tolerated even in older and more debilitated patients, and except for a slight increase in the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, no other significant cardiovascular complications occur. Although there are important pulmonary pathophysiological changes, hypercarbia, hypoxemia and barotraumas, they would develop rarely since effective ventilation monitoring and techniques are applied. The alteration in splanchnic perfusion is proportional with the increase in intra-abdominal pressure and duration of pneumoperitoneum.

CONCLUSION

A moderate-to-low intra-abdominal pressure (<12 mm Hg) can help limit the extent of the pathophysiological changes since consecutive organ dysfunctions are minimal, transient and do not influence the outcome.

Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure preserves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery usually requires a pneumoperitoneum by insufflating the abdominal cavity with carbon dioxide (CO2). Increased intraabdominal pressure causes diaphragmatic displacement resulting in compressed lung areas, which leads to formation of atelectasis, especially during mechanical ventilation. Application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can maintain pulmonary gas exchange. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of abdominal gas insufflation on arterial oxygenation during mechanical ventilation with and without PEEP in rats.

METHODS

In experiment 1, two groups of six rats were continuously insufflated with CO2 at 12 mmHg for 180 min. Group 1 was ventilated with 8 cm H2O PEEP and group 2 had 0 cm H2O PEEP. Group 3 served as a control. This group had abdominal wall lifting and was ventilated with 0 cmH2O PEEP. In experiment 2, two groups of six rats had abdominal CO2 insufflation and were ventilated with or without PEEP during 180 min (group 4 and 5). In this experiment, abdomens were desufflated in both groups for 5 min at 60 and 120 min. Blood pressure monitoring and measurement of arterial pO2 was performed by placement of an indwelling carotid artery catheter in both experiments.

RESULTS

In both experiments, paO2 values decreased significantly in insufflation groups that were ventilated with 0 cmH2O PEEP (groups 2 and 5). Insufflation groups ventilated with 8 cmH2O PEEP had paO2 values comparable to these of control group. There were no significant differences in mean arterial pressure between insufflation groups ventilated with or without PEEP.

CONCLUSION

PEEP preserves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum in rats with minimal adverse hemodynamic effects.

Anesthesia for operative endoscopy

Developments in both instruments and techniques have led to an increasing popularity of endoscopic surgery during the last two decades. Even though there are numerous advantages to using endoscopic surgery, life threatening surgical and anesthetic complications still exist. Precautions must be taken to cope with the potential complications. Anesthetic technique must provide optimal surgical conditions and lead to early recovery of the patient. Monitorization must allow safety of the patient during these potentially hazardous procedures. Both the anesthesiologist and the surgeon must be thoroughly aware of the potential complications of the procedure. This review discusses the physiological alterations occurring during operative endoscopy, the principles of anesthetic management and complications related both to surgery and to anesthesia techniques.