A potential cause (and cure) of a major gas leak

Modern anaesthesia vapourisers

Inhalational anaesthetic agents are usually liquids at room temperature and barometric pressure and need to be converted to vapour before being used and this conversion is effected using a vapouriser. Vapourisers have evolved from very basic devices to more complicated ones. Anaesthetists should understand the basic principles of anaesthetic vapouriser, including the principles that affect vapouriser output and how they influence vapouriser design. Most of the modern vapourisers in use are designed to be used between the flow meter and the common gas outlet on the anaesthesia machine. Modern vapourisers are flow and temperature compensated, concentration calibrated, direct reading, dial controlled and are unaffected by positive-pressure ventilation. Safety features include an anti-spill and a select-a-tec mechanism and a specific vapouriser filling device. Desflurane has unique physical properties requiring the use of a specific desflurane vapouriser. The most recently designed vapourisers are controlled by a central processing unit in the anaesthetic machine. The concentration of vapour is continuously monitored and adjusted by altering fresh gas flow through the vapouriser. This article looks at the basic design and functioning of the modern vapourisers.

Safety features in anaesthesia machine

Anaesthesia is one of the few sub-specialties of medicine, which has quickly adapted technology to improve patient safety. This application of technology can be seen in patient monitoring, advances in anaesthesia machines, intubating devices, ultrasound for visualisation of nerves and vessels, etc., Anaesthesia machines have come a long way in the last 100 years, the improvements being driven both by patient safety as well as functionality and economy of use. Incorporation of safety features in anaesthesia machines and ensuring that a proper check of the machine is done before use on a patient ensures patient safety. This review will trace all the present safety features in the machine and their evolution.

[Anesthesia equipment: fresh gas delivery systems. I. Mecanical systems with rotameters and calibrated vaporizers]

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the design, performance, failures, the checking before use of mechanical fresh gas delivery units (FGDUs) equipped with bobbin or ball-flowmeters delivering a continuous gas flow and calibrated vaporizers, marketed in France in 1999.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were obtained from a Medline review (1960-1999; search terms: anaesthetic machine, flowmeter, vaporizer), textbooks and personal files; specific data were provided by manufacturers.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The articles were considered for performance data, benefits and drawbacks, and characteristics, as well as the risks carried by mechanical FGDUs.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Seven anaesthetic machines out of 11 are equipped with mechanical FGDUs, including rotameters delivering a gas mixture up to 30 L.min-1, calibrated vaporizers and an O2-flush valve delivering at least 500 mL O2 per second (30 L.min-1). These units allow closed circuit anaesthesia. They carry a risk for barotrauma as three out of them can deliver at the gas outlet of the FGDUs a gas mixture at a pressure reaching 3.5 bars and four others at a pressure of 150-200 mmHg. They also carry a risk for hypoxia, either from a preferential leak of oxygen at the corresponding rotameter or the O2-flush valve, or from a leak of fresh gas mixture either in a vaporizer or the selectatec manifold. The vaporizers carry a risk for vapor delivery at a concentration differing notably from the value set on the concentration dial. Therefore their accuracy must be checked periodically and the FGDUs checked for a leak after the addition to or the removal of a vaporizer from the selectatec manifold. The optimal technique for leak detection is the negative pressure test.

Detection of interruptions in the breathing gas of ventilated anaesthetized patients

Interruption of the breathing gas to a ventilated anaesthetized patient due to accidental disconnection or anaesthesia system malfunction may have serious consequences if not detected quickly. A series of tests which covers the range of foreseeable mechanical problems was developed and used to test the performance of three breathing gas interruption monitors, two commercially available and one developed at Vancouver General Hospital. The tests were designed to evaluate the performance of monitors as installed on anaesthesia systems under a variety of failure conditions, including endotracheal tube disconnection with and without occlusion of the opening, kinks in the inspiratory and fresh gas hoses, disconnection of the fresh gas hose, leaks in the breathing circuit, excessive high or low pressure in the scavenging circuit, continuing high breathing circuit pressure, and kinks in the circuit pressure sensing hose. Ability to detect both significant changes in ventilation variables and faults existing at initiation of ventilation were also tested over a representative range of ventilator and patient variables using circle, coaxial and paediatric circuits. Only complete endotracheal tube disconnections with no obstruction of the opening were reliably detected by all three monitors. A commercial monitor with a single fixed-threshold alarm level also detected fresh gas interruptions in circle and adult coaxial circuits, but failed to alarm in response to any other fault condition. A monitor with selectable pressure thresholds and high, low, and continuing pressure limits detected just under half of the fault conditions. A microprocessor-based monitor developed at Vancouver General Hospital detected and correctly identified roughly 80 per cent of the faults. The series of tests forms the basis for a Canadian Standards Association Preliminary Standard (Z168.10) and will allow hospitals to test the performance of breathing gas interruption monitors in use in their institutions. Comments on the test series are solicited.