Comparison of adenosine and remifentanil infusions as adjuvants to desflurane anesthesia

Adenosine Receptors as Potential Therapeutic Analgesic Targets

Pain represents an international burden and a major socio-economic public health problem. New findings, detailed in this review, suggest that adenosine plays a significant role in neuropathic and inflammatory pain, by acting on its metabotropic adenosine receptors (A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, A3AR). Adenosine receptor ligands have a practical translational potential based on the favorable efficacy and safety profiles that emerged from clinical research on various agonists and antagonists for different pathologies. The present review collects the latest studies on selected adenosine receptor ligands in different pain models. Here, we also covered the many hypothesized pathways and the role of newly synthesized allosteric adenosine receptor modulators. This review aims to present a summary of recent research on adenosine receptors as prospective therapeutic targets for a range of pain-related disorders.

A multidisciplinary opioid-reduction pathway for robotic prostatectomy: outcomes at year one

BACKGROUND

Opioid use has come under increasing scrutiny, driven in part by the opioid crisis and growing concerns that up to 6% of opioid-naïve patients may become chronic opioid users. This has resulted in a revaluation of perioperative practice. For this reason, we implemented a multidisciplinary pathway to reduce perioperative opioid usage through education and standardization of practice.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective evaluation was performed after 1 year, comparing the outcomes to those of the 2 years prior to pathway implementation. Comparisons were made between pre- vs. post pathway change by 2:1 propensity matching between cohorts. Univariate linear regression models were created using demographic variables with those that were p < 0.15 included in the final model and using post-operative opioid use (in oral morphine equivalents, OME) as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

We found that intraoperative opioid use was significantly decreased 38.2 mg (28.3) vs. 18.0 mg (40.4) oral morphine equivalents (OME), p < .001, as was post-operative opioid use for the duration of the hospitalization, 46.3 mg (49.5) vs. 35.49 mg (43.7) OME, p = 0.002. In subgroup analysis of those that received some intraoperative opioids (n = 152) and those that received no opioids (n = 34), we found that both groups required fewer opioids in the post-operative period 47.0 mg (47.7) vs. 32.4 mg (40.6) OME, p = 0.001, + intraoperative opioids, 62.4 mg (62.9) vs. 35.8 mg (27.7) OME, p = 0.13, - intraoperative opioids. Time to discharge from the PACU was reduced in both groups 215 min (199) vs. 167 min (122), p < 0.003, + intraoperative opioids and 253 min (270) vs. 167 min (105), p = 0.028, - intraoperative opioids. The duration of time until meeting discharge criteria from PACU was 221 min (205) vs. 170 min (120), p = 0.001. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was significantly reduced 1.4 days (1.3) vs. 1.2 days (0.8), p = 0.005. Both sub-groups demonstrated reduced hospital LOS 1.5 days (1.4) vs. 1.2 days (0.8), p = 0.0047, + intraoperative opioids and 1.7 days (1.6) vs. 1.3 days (0.9), p = 0.0583, - intraoperative opioids. Average pain scores during PACU admission and post-PACU until discharge were not statistically different between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach to reduce opioids. Furthermore, it demonstrates improved patient outcomes as measured by both shorter PACU and almost 50% reduction in perioperative opioid use whilst maintaining similar analgesia as indicated by patient-reported pain scores.

Are opioids indispensable for general anaesthesia?

The drug-induced, reversible coma of anaesthesia requires three clinical outcomes: unconsciousness, immobility, and the control of autonomic nervous system (ANS) responses to surgical stimulation. Producing the anaesthetised state with a single anaesthetic agent, such as an inhaled vapour or propofol, is challenging, primarily because suppressing ANS responses requires very high anaesthetic concentrations, resulting in haemodynamic depression and prolonged recovery. The antinociceptive effects of opioids (i.e. minimum alveolar concentration reduction) are thus central to the well-entrenched 'balanced anaesthesia' concept. In recent years, the notion of 'multimodal general anaesthesia' has extended the concept of balanced anaesthesia to include more drugs that target different neuroanatomical circuits and multiple neurophysiologic mechanisms. The opioid epidemic has provided some of the motivation to move away from opioids toward other adjunct drugs. Persistent opioid use after surgery is a component of the opioid epidemic and is a major concern for perioperative physicians. Potential solutions to the problem of persistent opioid use after surgery have focused on proper 'opioid stewardship' after operation, wherein opioids are used conservatively in combination with other analgesic adjuncts, and excessive opioid prescribing for home use is avoided. But there is a paucity of data on how intraoperative opioid usage patterns may be contributing to persistent opioid use after surgery. There are cogent reasons to moderate perioperative opioid use, including intraoperative opioids, but whether these changes in practice integral to the multimodal general anaesthesia concept will improve anaesthesia outcomes, including persistent opioid use after surgery, is unknown. Studies investigating these issues are an important research priority.

An update on pain management for elderly patients undergoing ambulatory surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the drugs and techniques used for multimodal postoperative pain management in the older population undergoing surgery in the ambulatory setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Interest has grown in the possibility of adding adjuncts to a single shot nerve block in order to prolong the local anesthetic effect. The rapid and short-acting local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia are potentially beneficial for day-case surgery in the older population because of shorter duration of the motor block, faster recovery, and less transient neurologic symptoms. Another recent advance is the introduction of intravenous acetaminophen, which can rapidly achieve rapid peak plasma concentration (<15 min) following infusion and analgesic effect in ∼5 min with a duration of action up to 4 h.

SUMMARY

The nonopioid analgesic therapies will likely assume an increasingly important role in facilitating the recovery process and improving the satisfaction for elderly ambulatory surgery patients. Strategies to avoid the use of opioids and minimize opioid-related side-effects is an important advance as we expand on the use of ambulatory surgery for the aging population.

Remifentanil-acute opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a systematic review

The use of opioids may seem to be a double-edged sword; they provide straight analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects initially, but subsequently are associated with the expression of acute opioid tolerance (AOT) and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) that have been reported in experimental studies and clinical observations. It has been suggested that opioids can induce an acute tolerance and hyperalgesia in dose- and/or time-dependent manners even when used within the clinically accepted doses. Recently, remifentanil has been used for pain management in clinical anesthesia and in the intensive care units because of its rapid onset and offset. We reviewed articles analyzing AOT and/or OIH by remifentanil and focused on the following issues: (1) evidence of remifentanil inducing AOT and/or OIH and (2) importance of AOT and/or OIH in considering the reduction of remifentanil dosage or adopting preventive modulations. Twenty-four experimental and clinical studies were identified using electronic searches of MEDLINE (PubMed, Ovid, Springer, and Elsevier). However, the development of AOT and OIH by remifentanil administration remains controversial. There is no sufficient evidence to support or refute the existence of OIH in humans.

NMDA Receptor Antagonists, Gabapentinoids, α-2 Agonists, and Dexamethasone and Other Non-Opioid Adjuvants: Do They Have a Role in Plastic Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Inadequate pain control and opioid-related adverse effects result in delayed patient recovery and discharge times. Adjuvants help to improve the quality of analgesia and decrease opioid consumption, consequently decreasing opioid-related effects, such as nausea and vomiting, sedation, ileus, and respiratory depression. We review the mechanisms and clinical evidence for nonopioid adjuvants.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register were searched for meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomized, controlled trials that compared the adjuvants ketamine, gabapentin, pregabalin, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and dexamethasone with placebo. Keywords used in the search included "plastic surgery," "reconstructive surgery," "opioid," "pain," "analgesia," and the names of each adjuvant. The references of included studies were searched for additional relevant studies.

RESULTS

Ketamine was found in 6 meta-analyses to have a significant reduction in opioid requirements and may reduce the hyperalgesia associated with opioids. This seems to be most beneficial in surgeries where high postoperative pain is expected. Multiple robust trials have demonstrated that the gabapentinoids and α-2 agonists significantly improve quality of analgesia and decrease opioid consumption. Two recent meta-analyses found that a single low-dose of dexamethasone used for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis may also improve postoperative analgesia. There is also emerging evidence for the use of low-dose naloxone, adenosine, and neuraxial neostigmine and acupuncture as part of a successful multimodal pain management regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is a lack of studies specifically focused in the plastic and reconstructive surgery patient population, the existing literature provides information about when the above adjuvants are likely to have the greatest impact.

Does small-dose fentanyl improve perioperative outcomes in the ambulatory setting? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Despite its widespread use, the beneficial effect of low-dose fentanyl administered at induction of anesthesia on perioperative outcomes has not been studied in the ambulatory setting. Therefore, this study was designed to test the hypothesis that administration of small-dose fentanyl vs. saline during induction reduces coughing and movements without adversely affecting recovery after day-surgery.

METHODS

One hundred consenting outpatients scheduled to undergo superficial surgical procedures under general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) device for airway management were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: control (n = 50) or fentanyl (n = 50). After administration of 2 ml of the unlabelled study medication containing either fentanyl (100 μg) or saline, anesthesia was induced with lidocaine 30-50 mg and propofol 2 mg/kg IV followed by the insertion of an LMA device. General anesthesia was maintained using a propofol infusion, 75 μg/kg/min, and desflurane (2-5% end-tidal) in 100% oxygen.

RESULTS

Coughing was observed in six (12%) and ten (20%) in the fentanyl and control group, respectively (P = 0.41). The incidence of movements during surgery was lower in the fentanyl group (18% vs. 31%, P < 0001). There were no significant differences in early and late recovery times or pain scores between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Administration of a small-dose of fentanyl at induction of anesthesia significantly reduced purposeful movements during day-surgery under propofol-desflurane anesthesia. No significant difference was found in coughing or recovery times.

Intraoperative use of remifentanil and opioid induced hyperalgesia/acute opioid tolerance: systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The use of opioids has been increasing in operating room and intensive care unit to provide perioperative analgesia as well as stable hemodynamics. However, many authors have suggested that the use of opioids is associated with the expression of acute opioid tolerance (AOT) and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) in experimental studies and clinical observations in dose and/or time dependent exposure even when used within the clinically accepted doses. Recently, remifentanil has been used for pain management during anesthesia as well as in the intensive care units because of its rapid onset and offset.

OBJECTIVES

Search of the available literature to assess remifentanil AOT and OIH based on available published data.

METHODS

We reviewed articles analyzing remifentanil AOT and OIH, and focused our literature search on evidence based information. Experimental and clinical studies were identified using electronic searches of Medline (PubMed, Ovid, Springer, and Elsevier, ClinicalKey).

RESULTS

Our results showed that the development of remifentanil AOT and OIH is a clinically significant phenomenon requiring further research.

DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

AOT - defined as an increase in the required opioid dose to maintain adequate analgesia, and OIH - defined as decreased pain threshold after chronic opioid treatment, should be suspected with any unexplained pain report unassociated with the disease progression. The clinical significance of these findings was evaluated taking into account multiple methodological issues including the dose and duration of opioids administration, the different infusion mode, the co-administrated anesthetic drug's effect, method assessing pain sensitivity, and the repetitive and potentially tissue damaging nature of the stimuli used to determine the threshold during opioid infusion. Future studies need to investigate the contribution of remifentanil induced hyperalgesia to chronic pain and the role of pharmacological modulation to reverse this process.

Influence of esmolol on requirement of inhalational agent using entropy and assessment of its effect on immediate postoperative pain score

Background and Context:

Beta-blockers have been used for attenuation of stress response, decreasing anaesthetic requirement and augmentation of the effect of opioids during general anaesthesia.

Aims and Objectives:

The present study aims to evaluate the influence of esmolol on the requirement of an inhalational agent while monitoring the depth of anaesthesia by entropy and also its effect on immediate postoperative pain score.

Methods:

Fifty American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients, between 25 and 65 years of age who underwent lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated to two groups: Group E and Group S of 25 patients each. Group E received esmolol infusion while Group S received the same volume of saline infusion. Demographic data, haemodynamics, amount of isoflurane used, end-tidal isoflurane concentration, postoperative pain score and total dose of morphine consumed in immediate postoperative period of 30 min were analyzed by using appropriate statistical tests. Value of P<0.05 was considered significant and P<0.001 as highly significant.

Results:

The two groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, ASA physical status, duration of surgery and amount of isoflurane used during anaesthesia. Assessment of postoperative pain was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which showed significant difference at 30 min. The total dose of morphine consumption was significantly less (P<0.05) in Group E for relief of postoperative pain.

Conclusions:

We conclude that in light of depth of anaesthesia monitor esmolol has no effect on requirement of isoflurane, but it decreases the postoperative pain as well as postoperative requirement of morphine without increasing the risk of awareness.

Effects of intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative pain in patients undergoing major orofacial surgery: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE

We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled study to investigate the effects of the intraoperative intravenous infusion of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative pain in patients undergoing major orofacial surgery.

METHODS

Thirty patients (age, 16-42 years; 16 males/14 females) scheduled for sagittal split ramus osteotomy were assigned in a double-blind fashion to receive intraoperative intravenous infusion of ATP (n = 15) or saline (n = 15). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol, fentanyl, and vecuronium. Local anesthesia was added for intraoperative analgesia. In the ATP group, ATP was infused at a rate of 160 microg.kg(-1).min(-1) throughout surgery. Postoperative pain was managed with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine. The intensity of postoperative pain was assessed with a verbal numeric rating scale (NRS). Morphine consumption was also assessed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in demographic, anesthetic, and surgical data between the ATP and placebo groups. Intraoperatively, ATP effectively suppressed responses of blood pressure and heart rate to painful surgical stimuli. There were no differences in postoperative NRS scores between the two groups. However, postoperative morphine consumption was significantly less in the ATP group, compared with the placebo group, throughout the 72-h postoperative observation period. Cumulative morphine consumption for 72 h postoperatively was 47% less with ATP, compared with placebo. No adverse effect of ATP was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that intraoperative ATP infusion can blunt hemodynamic responses to surgical stimuli and produce prolonged analgesia in patients undergoing major orofacial surgery.

Non-nociceptive environmental stress induces hyperalgesia, not analgesia, in pain and opioid-experienced rats

It is well admitted that stress induces analgesia (SIA) via endogenous opioid release. However, there is evidence that stressful events play a role in the pathogenesis of pain, but little is known about mechanisms underlying such pain vulnerability. Previous studies reported that a single opioid exposure activates NMDA-dependent pronociceptive systems leading to long-term pain vulnerability after analgesia. Here, we studied whether prior inflammatory pain or/and opioid experiences may favour the development of pain vulnerability after non-nociceptive environmental stress (NNES). Nociceptive threshold (NT) changes were evaluated by paw pressure vocalization test. By contrast to discrete SIA observed in naive rats, 1 h stress induced hyperalgesia (SIH) for several hours (15-65% NT decrease) in pain and opioid experienced rats. Repetition of NNES induced an 18- to 22-fold SIH enhancement (3-4 days), whereas SIA decreased. SIH was still observed 4 months after pain and opioid experiences. This phenomenon is referred to as latent pain sensitization. Furthermore, a fentanyl ultra-low dose (ULD, 50 ng/kg) administration, mimicking SIA in naive rats, induced hyperalgesia (65% NT decrease, 4 h), not analgesia, in pain and opioid-experienced rats. This indicates that low levels of opioids induce opposite effects, that is analgesia vs hyperalgesia dependent on prior life events. In pain and opioid-experienced rats, NMDA receptor antagonists, ketamine or BN2572, completely prevented hyperalgesia when injected just before NNES or fentanyl ULD. This latent pain sensitization model may be important for studying the transition from acute to chronic pain and individual differences in pain vulnerability associated with prior life events.

Adenosine as a Non-Opioid Analgesic in the Perioperative Setting

Adenosine, a ubiquitous metabolic intermediate in the body, is involved in nearly every aspect of cell function, including neuromodulation and neurotransmission. Adenosine A(1) and A(2) receptors are widely distributed in the brain and spinal cord, and are a novel, non-opiate target for pain management. The potential of adenosine as a non-narcotic analgesic in anesthetized patients has been explored in clinical trials, including double-blind studies versus placebo and remifentanil infusion. These studies suggest that, compared to placebo or remifentanil, an intraoperative adenosine infusion stabilizes core hemodynamics and reduces the requirement for anesthesia during surgery. Further, adenosine improves postoperative recovery, as indicated by lower pain scores and less opioid consumption. The safety profile of adenosine has been well characterized based on use of currently approved adenosine products. The most common adverse events associated with its use include flushing, chest discomfort, dyspnea, headache, gastrointestinal discomfort, and lightheadedness. These effects are generally well tolerated and transient. Further studies are warranted to investigate the full potential of adenosine as a non-opioid analgesic in the perioperative setting.

Multicentre evaluation of the adenosine agonist GR79236X in patients with dental pain after third molar extraction

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is analgesic in humans, and the selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist GR79236X has significant anti-nociceptive activity in an animal pain model of inflammatory pain.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients with moderate pain after third molar extraction under general anaesthesia were randomized to receive a 15 min double-blind infusion containing either GR79236X 4 microg kg-1, GR79236X 10 microg kg-1, diclofenac 50 mg, or saline placebo. Rescue analgesia was promptly available to all patients.

RESULTS

Meaningful pain relief (mild or no pain) was attained by 9 (47%) patients in the placebo group, 12 (63%) patients in the GR79236 4 microg kg-1 group, 10 (48%) patients in the 10 microg kg-1 group, and 16 (80%) patients in the diclofenac 50 mg group. Neither dose of GR79236 produced a significant improvement over placebo, but diclofenac was superior to both placebo (P=0.036) and GR79236 10 microg kg-1 (P=0.034). Median times to rescue or additional analgesia were 62, 100, 60, and 363 min for patients receiving placebo, GR79236 4 microg kg-1, 10 microg kg-1, and diclofenac 50 mg, respectively (diclofenac significantly longer than placebo, P=0.002 log-rank test). Pain control was poor in the placebo group and in both GR79236 groups, with between 79 and 86% of patients having good pain control (i.e. mild or no pain) for <20% of the time compared with only 30% of patients who received diclofenac.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of efficacy of GR79236 compared with placebo, but the active control diclofenac was effective. It is possible that a higher dose of GR79236 might have been effective or that i.v. administration of this drug does not achieve appropriate concentrations in the brain or peripheral nerves.

Pain-relieving effects of intravenous ATP in chronic intractable orofacial pain: an open-label study

PURPOSE

Chronic orofacial pain is often refractory to conventional pain therapies. We conducted an open-label study to determine whether adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) could alleviate chronic intractable orofacial pain, and if so, which type of pain could respond to ATP.

METHODS

In 8 and 16 patients with non-neuropathic and neuropathic intractable orofacial pain, respectively, ATP was intravenously infused at a rate of 100 microgxkg(-1)xmin(-1) over 120 min. The magnitudes of spontaneous pain and brush-evoked allodynia were graded with a visual analog scale (VAS). When a VAS score for spontaneous pain was decreased by 50% or more by ATP, the patient was classified as a responder.

RESULTS

The patients could be clearly divided into 10 responders and 14 non-responders. Ten of the 16 patients (62.5%) with neuropathic pain, but none of the 8 patients with non-neuropathic pain, responded to ATP. In particular, all of 8 patients with neuropathic pain following pulpectomy, with or without subsequent tooth extraction, responded to ATP. In the 10 responders, VAS scores for spontaneous pain decreased slowly but progressively during the infusion period, and eventually, ATP reduced the VAS scores for spontaneous pain and allodynia by 82 +/- 15% and 74 +/- 9%, respectively. In these responders, the analgesic and anti-allodynic effects of ATP outlasted the infusion period for medians of 7 and 12 h, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous ATP did not relieve non-neuropathic orofacial pain. However, it exerted slowly expressed but long-lasting analgesic and anti-allodynic effects in patients with neuropathic orofacial pain, especially in those suffering from neuropathic pain following pulpectomy and/or tooth extraction.

Adenosine and ATP receptors

Adenosine and ATP, via P1 and P2 receptors respectively, can modulate pain transmission under physiological, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain conditions. Such influences reflect peripheral and central actions and effects on neurons as well as other cell types. In general, adenosine A1 receptors produce inhibitory effects on pain in a number of preclinical models and are a focus of attention. In humans, i.v. infusions of adenosine reduce some aspects of neuropathic pain and can reduce postoperative pain. For P2X receptors, there is a significant body of information indicating that inhibition of P2X3 receptors may be useful for relieving inflammatory and neuropathic pain. More recently, data have begun to emerge implicating P2X4, P2X7 and P2Y receptors in aspects of pain transmission. Both P1 and P2 receptors may represent novel targets for pain relief.

The Characteristics of Intravenous Adenosine-Induced Antinociception in a Rabbit Model of Acute Nociceptive Pain: A Comparative Study with Remifentanil

BACKGROUND

Adenosine and remifentanil are potent IV analgesics with ultrashort half-lives. The antinociceptive effect of IV adenosine has not been clearly characterized. We compared the antinociceptive effects of adenosine and remifentanil in rabbits.

METHODS

Sixteen rabbits, placed on a sling allowing reasonably free movement, received IV adenosine (400 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or remifentanil (0.4 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) over 240 min.

RESULTS

Both drugs produced profound antinociception, as assessed by the number of animals unresponsive to clamping the forepaw and the electrical stimulation threshold of escape movement. With remifentanil, the antinociceptive effect increased rapidly, reaching its peak at 60 min, and then began to decline despite continued infusion. After stopping the infusion, it decreased rapidly and disappeared within 30 min. The vasodilating effect of IV adenosine was immediate in onset and ultrashort in duration. The antinociceptive effect of adenosine increased slowly but progressively during the infusion, reaching its peak only when the infusion ended. Then it decreased slowly over the following 360 min after terminating the infusion.

CONCLUSION

Remifentanil had a rapid onset and short duration of action, and probably showed signs of tolerance development, whereas the antinocieptive effect of adenosine was slow in onset and long-lasting, despite its ultrashort plasma half-life and the immediate on-off profiles of its vasodilating effect.

The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain

Given the expanding role of ambulatory surgery and the need to facilitate an earlier hospital discharge, improving postoperative pain control has become an increasingly important issue for all anesthesiologists. As a result of the shift from inpatient to outpatient surgery, the use of IV patient-controlled analgesia and continuous epidural infusions has steadily declined. To manage the pain associated with increasingly complex surgical procedures on an ambulatory or short-stay basis, anesthesiologists and surgeons should prescribe multimodal analgesic regimens that use non-opioid analgesics (e.g., local anesthetics, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, acetaminophen, ketamine, alpha 2-agonists) to supplement opioid analgesics. The opioid-sparing effects of these compounds may lead to reduced nausea, vomiting, constipation, urinary retention, respiratory depression and sedation. Therefore, use of non-opioid analgesic techniques can lead to an improved quality of recovery for surgical patients.

Clinical application of adenosine and ATP for pain control

This review summarizes clinical application of adenosine and adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) in pain conditions. Investigations have been performed in patients with acute perioperative pain or chronic neuropathic pain treated with intravenous adenosine or ATP, or intrathecal adenosine. Characteristic central adenosine A1 receptor-mediated pain-relieving effects have been observed after intravenous adenosine infusion in human inflammation/sensitization pain models and in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Adenosine compounds, in low doses, can reduce allodynia/hyperalgesia more consistently than spontaneous pain, suggesting that these compounds affect neuronal pathophysiological mechanisms involved in central sensitization. Such pain-relieving effects, which are mostly mediated via central adenosine A1 receptor activation, have a slow onset and long duration of action, lasting usually for hours or days and occasionally for months. With acute perioperative pain, treatment with a low-dose infusion of adenosine compounds and the A1 receptor-mediated central antisensitization mechanisms may play only a minor part in the total perioperative pain experience. By administering sufficient doses of adenosine compounds during surgery, however, significant and long-lasting perioperative pain relief can be achieved via central A1 receptor-mediated antinociceptive/analgesic actions as well as via peripheral A2a or A3 receptor-mediated antiinflammatory actions. Thus, adenosine compounds have significant potential for alleviating various types of pain.

Indirect activation of adenosine A1 receptors in cultured rat hippocampal neurons by volatile anaesthetics

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Volatile anaesthetics depress excitatory signal transmission by potentiating the inhibitory action of GABAA receptors and there is strong evidence that this is related with anaesthesia. Using primary hippocampal cultures we analyzed the possibility that the volatile anaesthetics enflurane and sevoflurane depress excitatory signal transmission by activation of adenosine A1 receptors.

METHODS

Primary rat hippocampal cultures on 4 cm poly-L-lysine coated glass coverslips were loaded with the Ca2+-indicator fluo-3 and incorporated in a gastight, temperature-controlled perfusion chamber. The intracellular Ca2+-concentration was monitored with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (BioRad) using the 488 nm laser line of a krypton-argon laser for excitation and the Lasersharp Acquisition software for analysis.

RESULTS

Continuous perfusion in Mg2+-free medium generated spontaneous synchronized calcium oscillations, which were dose dependently depressed by the volatile anaesthetics enflurane and sevoflurane (0.25-1 minimum alveolar concentration). Addition of 100 nmol of 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine, a specific adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, partly reversed the anaesthetic-induced inhibition of the oscillation amplitude of the oscillating cells. The effect of the anaesthetics was mimicked by the addition of S-(p-nitrobenzyl)-6-thioguanosine, an adenosine transport inhibitor and by the addition of 5-amino-5-deoxyadenosine, an inhibitor of adenosine kinase.

CONCLUSIONS

The volatile anaesthetics sevoflurane and enflurane activate adenosine A1 receptors in primary rat hippocampal cultures. This effect is mediated by liberation of adenosine most likely by an interaction of the volatile anaesthetics with adenosine transport or key enzymes in adenosine metabolism.

The effect of adenosine triphosphate on vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block

Continuous IV adenosine triphosphate administration has been used during surgery in the expectation of analgesic and vasodilative effects. Because adenosine triphosphate inhibits neuromuscular transmission, we investigated whether the neuromuscular effect of vecuronium was enhanced by IV adenosine triphosphate in 29 patients randomly given either continuous IV adenosine triphosphate 0.1 mg.kg(-1).min(-1) or 0.9% NaCl when undergoing elective minor surgery. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol. Neuromuscular monitoring was recorded from the adductor pollicis muscle using electromyography with train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Vecuronium 25, 30, or 40 microg/kg was given and lag time, onset time, and maximum block were recorded. ED50 and ED95 values for each group were derived from least squares linear regression analysis. ED50 and ED95 values were 29 microg/kg and 44 microg/kg, respectively, for the adenosine triphosphate group and 26 microg/kg and 46 microg/kg, respectively, for the controls. Differences in lag time, onset time, and neuromuscular responses between the two groups were not statistically significant. A significantly larger number of patients in the adenosine triphosphate group showed hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg). Our results demonstrated that adenosine triphosphate 0.1 mg.kg(-1).min(-1) did not enhance the neuromuscular block induced by vecuronium.

Recent advances in intravenous anaesthesia

Efforts to develop new hypnotic compounds continue, although several have recently failed in development. Propofol has been reformulated in various presentations with and without preservatives. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences exist between some of these preparations, and it is currently unclear whether any have substantial advantages over the original presentation. The use of target-controlled infusion (TCI) has been extended to include paediatric anaesthesia and sedation. Application of TCI to remifentanil is now licensed. Linking of electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring to TCI for closed-loop anaesthesia remains a research tool, although commercial development may follow. The availability of stereoisomer ketamine and improved understanding of its pharmacology have increased non-anaesthetic use of ketamine as an adjunct analgesic. It may be useful in subhypnotic doses for postsurgical patients with pain refractory to morphine administration.

Spinal vs. supraspinal antinociceptive activity of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist cyclopentyl-adenosine in rats with inflammation

The adenosine A(1) receptor is involved in spinal cord antinociception. As its role at supraspinal sites is not well known, we studied the systemic effects of its agonist N-cyclopentyl-adenosine (CPA) in single motor units from adult-spinalized, intact and sham-spinalized rats. CPA was not effective after spinalization, but it was very effective in intact animals (ID50: 92+/-1.3 microg/kg, noxious pinch) and over 10-fold more potent in sham-spinalized animals (ID50 of 8.3+/-1 microg/kg). Wind-up was also inhibited by CPA. We also studied the effect of CPA in the immature spinal cord preparation, where CPA dose-dependently inhibited responses to low (IC50s: 9+/-0.7 and 7.7+/-1.3 nM) and high intensity stimulation (IC50s: 4.9+/-0.5 and 12.1+/-2 nM). We conclude that the integrity of the spinal cord is crucial for the antinociceptive activity of systemic CPA in adult rats but not in immature rats, not yet influenced by a completely developed supraspinal control.

Naloxone provokes similar pain facilitation as observed after short-term infusion of remifentanil in humans

In contrast to an expected preventive analgesic effect, clinical observations suggest that intraoperatively applied opioids can induce postoperative hyperalgesia. We tested the development of post-infusion hyperalgesia in a newly developed experimental model of electrically induced pain and secondary mechanical hyperalgesia. In a double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over study, 13 subjects received either saline placebo, remifentanil (0.05 or 0.1 microg/kg/min) or naloxone (0.01 mg/kg). Remifentanil dose-dependently reduced pain and mechanical hyperalgesia during the infusion, but upon withdrawal, pain and hyperalgesia increased significantly above control level (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). Naloxone infusion similarly resulted in increased pain (anti-analgesia) (p<0.001) and mechanical hyperalgesia (p<0.01). Increased pain ratings following withdrawal of remifentanil significantly correlated to anti-analgesia evoked by the mu-opioid antagonist naloxone (p<0.01) and was of similar magnitude, suggesting inhibition of endogenous opioids as an underlying mechanism. In contrast, hyperalgesia after remifentanil was more pronounced than hyperalgesia after naloxone administration and did not correlate to the observed anti-analgesic effects, suggesting the involvement of additional receptors systems other than the endorphin system.

Intravenous adenosine alleviates neuropathic pain: a double blind placebo controlled crossover trial using an enriched enrolment design

Adenosine analogs produce analgesic actions in nociceptive paradigms and alleviate manifestations of neuropathic pain in nerve injury models in rodents. In humans, previous work indicates an analgesic effect for adenosine administered intravenously in postoperative and neuropathic pain. In this double blind placebo controlled crossover trial, we used an enriched enrolment design to determine the effects of intravenous adenosine (50 microg/kg/min over 60min) on neuropathic pain. In Phase 1 of the trial, adenosine was administered in an open label manner, while in Phase 2 adenosine was administered in a double blind placebo controlled manner to 23 adenosine responders who had experienced a 30% or greater response in the open trial. Outcome measures included the McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), which generates a pain rating index (PRI), and contains a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain intensity, the neuropathy pain scale (NPS), and a VAS for pain relief. Subjects also graded the degree of allodynia and hyperalgesia using a VAS. Adenosine led to a significant reduction in spontaneous pain according to the MPQ-PRI, the MPQ-VAS and the VAS for pain relief. The NPS showed a pattern similar to the MPQ-PRI, with statistically significant reductions in scales 1 (intensity), 3 (hot), 6 (sensitive), 7 (itchy) and 9 (unpleasant). Adenosine also led to a significant reduction in pinprick hyperalgesia, but not in allodynia. Three patients from Phase 1 of the trial experienced long term resolution of their pain following intravenous adenosine (5,16,25 months). The results of this study support previous reports that indicate intravenous adenosine alleviates neuropathic pain and hyperalgesia.

Adenosine in the spinal cord and periphery: release and regulation of pain

In the central nervous system (CNS), adenosine is an important neuromodulator and regulates neuronal and non-neuronal cellular function (e.g. microglia) by actions on extracellular adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3) receptors. Extracellular levels of adenosine are regulated by synthesis, metabolism, release and uptake of adenosine. Adenosine also regulates pain transmission in the spinal cord and in the periphery, and a number of agents can alter the extracellular availability of adenosine and subsequently modulate pain transmission, particularly by activation of adenosine A(1) receptors. The use of capsaicin (which activates receptors selectively expressed on C-fibre afferent neurons and produces neurotoxic actions in certain paradigms) allows for an interpretation of C-fibre involvement in such processes. In the spinal cord, adenosine availability/release is enhanced by depolarization (K(+), capsaicin, substance P, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)), by inhibition of metabolism or uptake (inhibitors of adenosine kinase (AK), adenosine deaminase (AD), equilibrative transporters), and by receptor-operated mechanisms (opioids, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), noradrenaline (NA)). Some of these agents release adenosine via an equilibrative transporter indicating production of adenosine inside the cell (K(+), morphine), while others release nucleotide which is converted extracellularly to adenosine by ecto-5'-nucleotidase (capsaicin, 5-HT). Release can be capsaicin-sensitive, Ca(2+)-dependent and involve G-proteins, and this suggests that within C-fibres, Ca(2+)-dependent intracellular processes regulate production and release of adenosine. In the periphery, adenosine is released from both neuronal and non-neuronal sources. Neuronal release from capsaicin-sensitive afferents is induced by glutamate and by neurogenic inflammation (capsaicin, low concentration of formalin), while that from sympathetic postganglionic neurons (probably as adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) with NA) occurs following more generalized inflammation. Such release is modified differentially by inhibitors of AK and AD. Following nerve injury, there is an alteration in capsaicin-sensitive adenosine release, as spinal release now is less responsive to opioids, while peripheral release is less responsive to inhibitors of metabolism. Following inflammation, adenosine is released from a variety of cell types in addition to neurons (e.g. endothelial cells, neutrophils, mast cells, fibroblasts). ATP is released both spinally and peripherally following inflammation or injury, and may be converted to adenosine by ecto-5'-nucleotidase contributing an additional source of adenosine. Release of adenosine from both spinal and peripheral compartments has inhibitory effects on pain transmission, as methylxanthine adenosine receptor antagonists reduce analgesia produced by agents which augment extracellular levels of adenosine spinally (morphine, 5-HT, substance P, AK inhibitors) and peripherally (AK inhibitors, AD inhibitors). Increases in extracellular adenosine availability also may contribute to antiinflammatory effects of certain agents (methotrexate, sulfasalazine, salicylates, AK inhibitors), and this could have secondary effects on pain signalling in chronic inflammation. The purpose of the present review is to consider: (a). the factors that regulate the extracellular availability of adenosine in the spinal cord and at peripheral sites; and (b). the extent to which this adenosine affects pain signalling in these two distinct compartments.

The volatile anesthetic isoflurane suppresses spontaneous calcium oscillations in vitro in rat hippocampal neurons by activation of adenosine A1 receptors

Primary cultures of rat hippocampal neurons were loaded with the Ca(2+)-indicator fluo-3 and studied with a confocal laser microscope. In Mg(2+)-free medium the cultures showed spontaneous synchronized calcium oscillations. These oscillations derived from excitatory signal transmission by N-methyl-D-aspartate and (+/-)-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid/kainate receptors and were modulated by gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors. The oscillations were dose-dependently depressed by adenosine (IC50=2 microM) or by 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine a specific adenosine A1 receptor agonist (IC50=40 nM). These effects were reverted by 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a specific adenosine A1 receptor antagonist. The volatile anesthetic isoflurane also depressed these spontaneous calcium oscillations in a dose dependent manner (IC50=0.25 MAC, Minimum Alveolar Concentration). The isoflurane-induced inhibition was partly reversed in 29-38% of the neurons by DPCPX, indicating that the anesthetic activates this receptor possibly by increasing the extracellular concentration of adenosine.

Pharmacotherapeutic considerations in anesthesia

This article focuses on new findings leading to improved understanding of the pathophysiology and mechanisms of potential drug interactions between anesthetic drugs or techniques and cardiovascular medications in patients scheduled for surgery. Only the most frequently used drugs are reviewed. Elective surgery provides the luxury to consider these risks and alter therapy accordingly. Under urgent circumstances, however, the increased risks associated with these agents should be anticipated with the goal to minimize adverse effects while maintaining optimal cardiovascular function in the perioperative period.

Characterization of the analgesic actions of adenosine: comparison of adenosine and remifentanil infusions in patients undergoing major surgical procedures

Perioperative pain is still a major problem, and new pharmacological means should be explored to mitigate such pain. Adenosine is an ubiquitous endogenous substance; when exogenously administered, it provides a number of salutary effects including neuromodulation, antinociception, and cytoprotective actions. The aim of this study was to characterize the perioperative antinociceptive-analgesic effects of intraoperative adenosine infusion and determine the duration of actions in the postoperative period, and compare them to those of remifentanil in patients undergoing major surgical procedures in a double-blind study.Sixty-two patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments. After standard induction of anesthesia, the lungs were mechanically ventilated. Anesthesia was maintained with a constant alveolar concentration of inhaled anesthetics (3% desflurane and 65% nitrous oxide in oxygen). A variable-rate of intravenous infusion of adenosine (50-500 microg kg(-1) x min(-1)) or remifentanil (0.05-0.5 microg kg(-1) x min(-1)) was initiated 5 min before the skin incision and was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure and heart rate within 20% of baseline values during surgery. Postoperative evaluations included the level of sedation, degree of pain severity, opioid analgesic (fentanyl, morphine) consumption, and cardiorespiratory variables for 48 h. Intraoperative inhibition of the cardiovascular responses to surgical stimulation could be equally achieved by adenosine or remifentanil, and both could maintain excellent hemodynamic stability. Postoperatively, however, there were striking differences: (1). initial pain score was reduced by 60% (P<0.001) in the adenosine group compared to the remifentanil group and it remained lower throughout the 48 h recovery period; (2). postoperative morphine requirements during the first 0.25, 2 and 48 h were consistently lower in the adenosine group as compared to the remifentanil group (78, 71 and 42%, P<0.001, respectively); (3). adenosine patients remained significantly less sedated at all evaluations; (4) the end-tidal and arterial carbon dioxide values in the remifentanil group were significantly higher when patients were admitted to the postanesthesia care unit. No adverse effect of adenosine was observed at any time. Intraoperative adenosine infusion provided a salutary recovery from anesthesia associated with a pronounced and sustained postoperative pain relief. Compared to remifentanil, adenosine significantly reduced the opioid requirements and minimized the side effects including protracted sedation, cardiorespiratory instability, nausea, and vomiting in the postoperative recovery period.

Supplementing desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia with small-dose ketamine reduces perioperative opioid analgesic requirements

Relative large-dose intraoperative remifentanil could lead to the need for more postoperative analgesics. Intraoperative N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, such as ketamine, decrease postoperative opioid use. We therefore tested the hypothesis that intraoperative small-dose ketamine improves postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery with remifentanil-based anesthesia. Fifty patients undergoing abdominal surgery under remifentanil-based anesthesia were randomly assigned to intraoperative ketamine or saline (control) supplementation. The initial ketamine dose of 0.15 mg/kg was followed by 2 microg. kg(-1). min(-1). In both groups, desflurane was kept constant at 0.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration without N(2)O, and a remifentanil infusion was titrated to autonomic responses. All patients were given 0.15 mg/kg of morphine 30 min before the end of surgery. Pain scores and morphine consumption were recorded for 24 postoperative h. Less of the remifentanil was required in the Ketamine than in the Control group (P < 0.01). Pain scores were significantly larger in the Control group during the first 15 postoperative min but were subsequently similar in the two groups. The Ketamine patients required postoperative morphine later (P < 0.01) and received less morphine during the first 24 postoperative h: 46 mg (interquartile range, 34-58 mg) versus 69 mg (interquartile range, 41-87 mg, P < 0.01). No psychotomimetic symptoms were noted in either group. In conclusion, supplementing remifentanil-based anesthesia with small-dose ketamine decreases intraoperative remifentanil use and postoperative morphine consumption without increasing the incidence of side effects. Thus, intraoperative small-dose ketamine may be a useful adjuvant to intraoperative remifentanil.

IMPLICATIONS

Supplementing remifentanil-based anesthesia with small-dose ketamine decreased intraoperative remifentanil use and postoperative morphine consumption. These data demonstrate that N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists, such as ketamine, can be a useful adjuvant to intraoperative remifentanil.

Adenosine A1 receptor activation selectively impairs the acquisition of contextual fear conditioning in rats

Three experiments were conducted to examine the importance of adenosine A1 receptors for the acquisition and expression of hippocampal-dependent and hippocampal-independent forms of conditioned fear. In Experiment 1, the selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist, N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), or saline was administered intraperitoneally to male rats 30 min prior to Pavlovian fear conditioning, which consisted of 7 tone-shock pairings. Adenosine A1 receptor activation dose-dependently and selectively disrupted the acquisition of contextual fear conditioning while sparing tone-shock associations. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that CPA's selective disruption of contextual learning could not be attributed to context being weaker than tone conditioning or to state-dependent learning. Adenosine A1 receptor activation also impaired the expression of both context- and tone-elicited fear. These results suggest that endogenous adenosine modulates the acquisition and expression of emotional (fear) memories by acting on A1 receptors in brain regions underlying fear conditioning.

Inhalational anaesthesia

Sevoflurane and desflurane have important advantages over isoflurane and halothane. Disadvantages, which the clinician should keep in mind, include the degradation of both agents by soda lime under certain circumstances during closed circuit anaesthesia. As a result compound A and carbon monoxide (CO) may be generated in soda lime canisters and may be inhaled by patients. The extent to which this constitutes a significant problem during routine anaesthesia in humans is not clear. Recent developments in absorbent technology have the potential to reduce any hazard to negligible proportions. Other undesirable properties of the newer inhalation agents include agitation with sevoflurane in children and cardiovascular and airway effects with desflurane.

The use of esmolol as an alternative to remifentanil during desflurane anesthesia for fast-track outpatient gynecologic laparoscopic surgery

We compared esmolol and remifentanil infusions with respect to their effect on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and early recovery after outpatient laparoscopic surgery when administered as IV adjuvants during desflurane anesthesia. After premedication with midazolam 2 mg IV, anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg. kg(-1) IV in combination with either esmolol 1 mg. kg(-1) IV (n = 27) or remifentanil 1 microg. kg(-1) IV (n = 26) and succinylcholine 1 mg. kg(-1) IV according to a randomized, double-blinded protocol. Anesthesia was initially maintained with desflurane 2.5% (subsequently titrated to maintain an electroencephalogram-bispectral index value of 60) and nitrous oxide 65% in oxygen. Before skin incision, an infusion of either esmolol (5 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) or remifentanil (0.05 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) was started and titrated to maintain the heart rate within 25% of the baseline value. Mivacurium, 0.04 mg/kg IV, bolus doses were administered to maintain a stable peak inspiratory pressure. Esmolol (12.8 +/- 13.1 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) and remifentanil (0.04 +/- 0.02 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) infusions were equally effective in maintaining a stable heart rate during these laparoscopic procedures. Although the mivacurium requirement was larger in the Esmolol group (7 +/- 5 vs 3 +/- 4 mg), the Esmolol group reported a smaller incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (4% vs 35%). Both drugs were associated with frequent "postanesthesia care unit bypass" rates (78-81%), short times to "home readiness" (119-120 min), excellent patient satisfaction (81-85%), and rapid resumption of normal activities (2.6-3.2 d). Fast-tracked patients were ready for discharge home significantly earlier (112 +/- 46 vs 151 +/- 50 min). We concluded that esmolol infusion is an acceptable alternative to remifentanil infusion for maintaining hemodynamic stability during desflurane-based fast-track anesthesia for outpatient gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.