Laryngospasm treatment--an explanation

A proposed mechanism to assess knowledge of pediatric hospitalists to identify and manage rare events during procedural sedation

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the knowledge of pediatric hospitalists (PHs) in identifying and managing rare events during procedural sedation (PS) with ketamine and nitrous oxide (N2O).

METHODS

A Web-based survey with multiple choice questions and case scenarios was used to determine the knowledge of PHs in identifying infrequent contraindications and managing laryngospasm, a rare life-threatening complication during PS. The survey was sent to all PHs at St Louis Children's Hospital.

RESULTS

Forty percent of experienced PHs (>50 sedation procedures performed) and 5% of inexperienced PHs (<50 sedation procedures performed) identified all 4 ketamine contraindications. Twenty-one percent of experienced PHs and 4% of inexperienced PHs identified all 6 N2O contraindications. Ninety-five percent of PHs identified presence of laryngospasm in a case scenario. As the patient in the case scenario progressed from partial to complete laryngospasm, 84% and 82% of PHs chose either the preferred or acceptable strategy to manage the patient. With further deterioration in the patient's status in the scenario, 66% and 71% of PHs chose either the preferred or acceptable strategy to manage the patient. The preferred strategy at each step is one that attempted the least invasive maneuver to manage the patient. There was no significant difference between experienced and inexperienced PHs in the management of laryngospasm.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge gaps exist among PHs regarding contraindications for ketamine and N2O that are infrequently encountered in patients and for the management of laryngospasm, a rare adverse event with ketamine. Ongoing teaching tools are necessary to assess and maintain the knowledge of sedation providers regarding rare events during PS that can improve their proficiency.

S. Pediatric Otolaryngology

Otolaryngologic procedures are commonly performed on children. In fact, pressure equalizing tube placement (ear tubes) and adenotonsillectomy are among the most frequent surgical interventions in the pediatric population. Therefore, every anesthesiologist who manages children undergoing otolaryngologic procedures must be familiar with the special implications of sharing the pediatric airway with an otolaryngologist working in the head and neck region. In addition, it is imperative to be skilled in the challenges of compassionately yet safely managing anxious young patients and their parents from the time of preoperative assessment until discharge from the post anesthesia care unit.

Laryngospasm: review of different prevention and treatment modalities

Laryngospasm is a common complication in pediatric anesthesia. In the majority of cases, laryngospasm is self-limiting. However, sometimes laryngospasm persists and if not appropriately treated, it may result in serious complications that may be life-threatening. The present review discusses laryngospasm with the emphasis on the different prevention and treatment modalities.

Pediatric laryngospasm

Pediatric laryngospasm is an anesthetic emergency. It is a relatively common phenomenon that occurs with varying frequency dependent on multiple factors. In view of this and the clear risks to the patient when it occurs, a consensus committee has been established to determine the evidence based management of this condition. This article will cover the definition, causes and recognition of laryngospasm and the evidence behind a proposed algorithm for its' management.

Management der oberen Atemwege beim spontan atmenden Kind

In unconscious, spontaneously breathing and anaesthetised children, a high incidence of partial or complete airway obstruction jeopardizes sufficient oxygenation. In this situation, the most important and efficient manoeuvre is to open up the upper airway. Chin lift, jaw thrust and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are proven and effective methods for opening an obstructed upper airway. In addition to these simple airway manoeuvres, different techniques of body positioning (e.g., lateral positioning or supine position in combination with the "sniffing position") are effective to improve and maintain upper airway patency.

A pilot study of recovery room bypass ("fast-track protocol") in a community hospital

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of short-acting anesthetic drugs and techniques to achieve recovery room bypass criteria after minor surgery in a community hospital environment.

METHODS

After agreement by a multidisciplinary committee, a pilot project was undertaken to assess the usefulness of ultra- short acting anesthetic drugs and pre-emptive analgesia to facilitate rapid recovery from general anesthesia. A cohort of 100 ASA I-II patients aged 18-65 yr undergoing simple knee arthroscopy or minor peripheral orthopedic procedures was compared to a similar cohort treated in the three months prior to the study period. Outcomes of interest included patient morbidity, success in achieving post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) bypass criteria, impact upon nursing resources, duration of operating room (OR) and hospital stay, and pharmaceutical costs before and after implementation.

RESULTS

No patient morbidity was demonstrated prior to discharge home, and successful PACU bypass occurred in 83% of cases. Achievement of PACU discharge criteria while in the OR did not prolong the OR time, and discharge from hospital occurred earlier in the patients who did not require PACU care (P=0.0006 all "fast-track cases" vs all "controls"). Nursing complaints were more numerous when the day surgery personnel did not normally participate in PACU care. The cost of anesthetic care was significantly more using ultra-short acting drugs (CDN $14.17 vs CDN $20.57), but closer adherence to protocol could reduce this differential (CDN $18.84).

CONCLUSION

Not all patients who receive a general anesthetic require admission to a phase I recovery facility. However, the justification for use of more expensive pharmaceuticals to achieve PACU bypass requires extensive changes in operating systems and voluntary professional behaviours.