Peritoneo-venous shunting for ascites

Contemporary Management of Malignant Ascites

INTRODUCTION

Malignant ascites (MA) develops when malignant disease of the peritoneum causes excess fluid to accumulate in the abdominal cavity. It portends a poor prognosis and is associated with debilitating symptoms. While several palliative therapies exist, none have proven curative or free from side effects and complications. This review article describes experimental therapies on the horizon and the contemporary management of MA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, in which studies of emerging or experimental therapies under investigation for the management of MA were reviewed. Current therapies were also reviewed to provide important context. Data, including study design, sample size, primary and secondary outcomes, and side effects were recorded and described. Studies were then categorized into distinct sections and subsections, with tables corresponding to each section.

RESULTS

Five current therapies, including paracentesis, diuretics, peritoneovenous shunting, permanent catheters, and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, are described. Their limitations in effectively managing MA are highlighted. The "Experimental therapies" section is subsectioned into several categories, with the major studies corresponding to each section thoroughly described regarding methods, results, and validity. A final section describes treatments for mucinous ascites, which has distinct characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

While each of the experimental therapies described offers unique benefits and has demonstrated some promise in managing MA, they all have limitations that have thus far prevented any one of them from being routinely used in practice. MA remains a challenging condition to treat, warranting further research into novel therapies.

Radiological and Surgical Treatments of Portal Hypertension

Interventions for portal hypertension are continuously evolving and expanding beyond the realm of medical management. When complications such as varices and ascites persist despite conservative interventions, procedures including transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation, transvenous obliteration, portal vein recanalization, splenic artery embolization, surgical shunt creation, and devascularization are all potential interventions detailed in this article. Selection of the optimal procedure to address the underlying cause, treat symptoms, and, in some cases, bridge to liver transplantation depends on the specific etiology of portal hypertension and the patient's comorbidities.

Chronological Course and Clinical Features after Denver Peritoneovenous Shunt Placement in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Refractory ascites affects the prognosis and quality of life in patients with liver cirrhosis. Peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) is a treatment procedure of palliative interventional radiology for refractory ascites. Although it is reportedly associated with serious complications (e.g., heart failure, thrombotic disease), the clinical course of PVS has not been thoroughly evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between chronological course and complications after PVS for refractory ascites in liver cirrhosis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 14 patients with refractory ascites associated with decompensated cirrhosis who underwent PVS placement between June 2011 and June 2023. The clinical characteristics, changes in cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), and laboratory data (i.e., brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), D-dimer, platelet) were evaluated. Follow-up CT images in eight patients were also evaluated for ascites and complications.

RESULTS

No serious complication associated with the procedure occurred in any case. Transient increases in BNP and D-dimer levels, decreased platelet counts, and the worsening of CTR were observed in the 2 days after PVS; however, they were improved in 7 days in all cases except one. In the follow-up CT, the amount of ascites decreased in all patients, but one patient with a continuous increase in D-dimer 2 and 7 days after PVS had thrombotic disease (renal and splenic infarction). The mean PVS patency was 345.4 days, and the median survival after PVS placement was 474.4 days.

CONCLUSIONS

PVS placement for refractory ascites is a technically feasible palliative therapy. The combined evaluation of chronological changes in BNP, D-dimer, platelet count and CTR, and follow-up CT images may be useful for the early prediction of the efficacy and complications of PVS.

Pleurovenous Shunt Placement for the Management of Nonmalignant Pleural Effusion

Therapeutic thoracentesis is a first-line therapy in the management of patients with medically refractory, nonmalignant pleural effusion. However, when required in short intervals, serial thoracenteses can lead to increased procedure-related complications and negatively impact quality of life. Alternative treatment options vary depending on the etiology of fluid accumulation. Hepatic hydrothorax secondary to cirrhosis is a common cause of medically refractory pleural effusion encountered by interventional radiologists. In select patients in whom surgical pleurodesis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement, and/or tunneled pleural catheter placement cannot be performed or provide inadequate relief, implantation of a pleurovenous (Denver) shunt may assist in palliation. The Denver shunt system allows decompression of pleural fluid into the central venous circulation by utilizing unidirectional valves and a manually operated subcutaneous pump. Though limited reports have described favorable technical and clinical success, more research is required to determine the safety and efficacy of this procedure. This article discusses pleurovenous shunt placement, postprocedure shunt evaluation, and potential associated complications.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiologic Management of Portal Hypertension

Cirrhosis is a heterogeneous disease that cannot be studied as a single entity and is classified in two main prognostic stages: compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Portal hypertension, characterized by a pathological increase of the portal pressure and by the formation of portal-systemic collaterals that bypass the liver, is the initial and main consequence of cirrhosis and is responsible for the majority of its complications. A myriad of treatment options exists for appropriately managing the most common complications of portal hypertension, including acute variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Removal of Peritnoeo-venous-atrial shunt thrombus without cardiopulmonary bypass

Thrombus formation is not uncommon in longstanding intracardiac catheters, but formation of a thrombus at the tip of a Peritnoeo-venous-atrial shunt, causing obstruction of the tricuspid valve, is a rare complication and frequently unrecognized. A large intracardiac thrombus causing valve obstruction requires surgical removal with the support of cardiopulmonary bypass which is associated with significant morbidity. We successfully removed a thrombus attached to the tip of peritoneovenous shunt without cardiopulmonary bypass in a 25-year-old man.

Palliative Treatment of Malignant Refractory Ascites by Positioning of Denver Peritoneovenous Shunt

Malignant ascites is relatively common in patients with certain types of end-stage cancer. Traditional treatments based on fluid and salt restriction and diuretic therapy often are not able to contain neoplastic ascites. These patients consequently undergo repeated abdominal paracentesis, with further plasma protein loss and risk of injury to abdominal viscera. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with Denver peritoneovenous shunt and the outcome of patients with malignant ascites and suggest some modifications to improve device patency. From February 1997 to December 1999, 44 Denver peritoneovenous shunts were placed in 42 patients, 17 women and 25 men, aged between 38 and 77 years (mean, 62.3), affected with malignant ascites due to advanced abdominal cancer. At the time of admission, 72% of patients had pain, 88% dysphagia, 66% nausea and/or vomiting, and 83% dyspnea. Eleven patients underwent local anesthesia with lidocaine and 33 general anesthesia with rapidly metabolized drugs. In 27 cases we used the peritoneal-internal jugular right vein surgical approach and in 3 cases the peritoneal-femoral vein surgical access, joining the saphena vein to the cross. In 10 cases, a radiological positioning of the Denver peritoneovenous shunt was effected by a trans-subclavian access. Relief of ascites symptoms was obtained in 87.5% of cases, with reduction of dyspnea, an increased appetite and improved ambulation. Denver peritoneovenous shunt is a good device to relieve malignant ascites, thereby reducing the risk of complications and the number of hospital admissions due to repeated paracentesis and consequently improving the quality of life. A careful patient selection, an accurate follow-up and some device modifications could improve the shunt performance, allowing a wider application of the Denver peritoneovenous shunt.

Ultrafiltration by Hemofilter - A new Therapeutic Measure in Intractable Ascites

The clinical efficacy of ultrafiltration (UF) of ascitic fluid with hemofilter in the treatment of intractable ascites associated with chronic liver disease or intraabdominal malignancy was studied in fifteen patients. The ascitic fluid was reinfused into the peritoneal cavity after ultrafiltration.

An average of 6.2 liters of fluid was removed during 4.4 hours of ultrafiltration with no significant change in blood pressure, central venous pressure, hemoglobin, platelets or plasma creatinine. Ascitic fluid albumin rose significantly immediately after the procedure (from 5.2 ± 4.3 gm/L to 31.9 ± 30.0 gm/L, P < 0.01). The plasma albumin concentration increased significantly at the end of UF (P < 0.001). Also there was a significant increase in urine output (P < 0.001), urinary sodium excretion (P < 0.001), and endogenous creatinine clearance (P < 0.01) during the 48 hours following UF. There was no evidence of hemodynamic, renal or hematological dysfunction, and other complications, including encephalopathy, peritonitis and variceal bleeding were not experienced. Ultrafiltration of ascitic fluid with hemofilter may be safely used in the temporary relief of refractory ascites due to cirrhosis or intra-abdominal malignancy.

Symptomatic Fluid Drainage: Peritoneovenous Shunt Placement

Ascites causes significant discomfort and has negative impact on patient's quality of life. Medical therapies including dietary restriction and diuretics are successful in only 40 to 44% of patients with malignant ascites and repeated paracentesis only provides temporary symptomatic relief. Therefore, a more permanent solution is necessary. Indwelling catheters or peritoneovenous shunt placement can provide more permanent symptomatic relief and improve patients' quality of life. Unlike indwelling catheters, peritoneovenous shunts do not limit patients' life style and therefore should be offered as first option in patients who are good candidates. Denver shunt (CareFusion-BD Worldwide) is the current available peritoneovenous shunt. In this article, the indications, contraindications, technical aspects of shunt placement, and techniques to prevent postprocedure complications will be discussed.

Cell-Free and Concentrated Ascites Reinfusion Therapy for Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis

Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) is expected to improve symptoms associated with refractory ascites of the decompensated liver cirrhosis patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CART system performed on the decompensated liver cirrhosis patients. In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated 24 CART processes performed on 11 patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. We evaluated the effectiveness and adverse events during CART procedures. The amounts of collected and concentrated ascites were 4491.7 ± 2222.8 mL (mean ± SD), respectively, and the concentration ratio was 22.4 ± 15.3 times, respectively. The amount of collected protein in ascites was 2.3 ± 0.5 g/dL, and concentration ratio of protein was 8.2 ± 9.4 times. Serum protein level was not significantly different between before and after CART sessions. Thus, CART allowed for the reduction of doses of albumin preparations (Alb) to be administered. CART has been reported to cause two adverse reactions: elevation of body temperature and decrease in blood pressure. In our study, decreased blood pressure was not observed even in patients with > 5 L of ascites drained. Although a transient elevation in body temperature was seen in only one patient, this febrile patient immediately returned to normal body temperature with the use of NSAIDs. In patients with refractory ascites of decompensated liver cirrhosis in whom complete cure cannot be expected, CART improves their QOL and, in terms of medical economy, allows for the reduction of doses of Alb. CART can be effectively applied as a palliative procedure for refractory ascites of decompensated liver cirrhosis patients.

Spontaneous central venous thrombosis and shunt occlusion following peritoneovenous shunt placement for intractable ascites

A 43-year-old man had a peritoneovenous shunt inserted for the treatment of chylous ascites secondary to myelofibrosis. Despite being on anticoagulation for superior mesenteric vein thrombosis, he developed shunt dysfunction within two weeks of insertion. Superior venacavography showed multiple filling defects in the right axillary vein, no filling of the right brachiocephalic and right subclavian vein, and thrombotic occlusion of the internal jugular veins bilaterally. The shunt was removed 11 days after insertion, and there was extensive thrombosis of the venous end of the shunt and the compressible pump chamber. Shunt thrombosis is known to occur but remains a rare complication, with 87% of such obstructions being due to a thrombus at the tip of the venous end of the shunt. Extensive thrombosis of the shunt (as in the present case) is very rare.

Efficacy of vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan in treatment of hepatic edema

AIM

Tolvaptan, an oral active vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, is widely used for hepatic edema in Japan, but its clinical benefits have yet to be fully clarified. The present study evaluated the efficacy of tolvaptan in hepatic edema.

METHODS

The efficacy and treatment regimen of tolvaptan were evaluated in 150 patients with hepatic edema by analyzing the initial (day 14) and long-term (day 90) responses to the drug and their predictive factors. All patients were divided into good (Child-Pugh classification B, and absent of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma) and poor hepatic condition groups, and the response rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The initial response rate was 62%, and the long-term response rate was 47%. The assessment of predictive factors for response to tolvaptan showed that serum creatinine and C-reactive protein levels were important predictors of initial response, and that hepatic conditions, such as the Child-Pugh score or presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as initial response, were significant predictors of long-term response. In addition, both the initial and long-term response rates and the cumulative survival rate were found to be higher in the good hepatic condition group than in the poor hepatic condition group, respectively (71% vs. 57%, P = 0.113; 62% vs. 39%, P = 0.009; log-rank test, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that tolvaptan may provide high response rates when used early in the course of hepatic edema, or when both hepatic and renal functions are still retained, leading to an improved disease prognosis.

Automated low-flow ascites pump for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites

Cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites (RA) can be treated with repeated large volume paracentesis (LVP), with the insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or with liver transplantation. However, side effects and complications of these therapeutic options, as well as organ shortage, warrant the development of novel treatments. The automated low-flow ascites pump (alfapump^®) is a subcutaneously-implanted novel battery-driven device that pumps ascitic fluid from the peritoneal cavity into the urinary bladder. Ascites can therefore be aspirated in a time- and volume-controlled mode and evacuated by urination. Here we review the currently available data about patient selection, efficacy and safety of the alfapump and provide recommendations for the management of patients treated with this new method.

Superior Vena Cava Thrombosis Secondary To Peritoneal Venous Shunting H. Jane Bussey, M.D., Webster S. Lowder, M.D., and Fred J. Wolma, M.D., Faca Galveston, Texas

Peritoneal venous shunts are effec tive in providing lasting relief to pa tients with medically intractable as cites. Nutrition and renal function im prove. Reported complications are var ied. As far as we know, the complication of superior vena cava obstruction re ported here has not been reported be fore. Response to conservative therapy resulted in amelioration of edema of the upper trunk and face.

Management of Renal Complications of Liver Disease

Included among the most important renal complica tions of liver disease is progressive sodium retention leading to the formation of edema and ascites and the hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). When ascites is refractory to conventional treatment, the use of invasive proce dures such as reinfusion or dialytic ultrafiltration of as cites or the peritoneovenous shunt may be indicated. The possibility that continuous arteriovenous hemo filtration may be useful in removing fluid in patients who would not otherwise tolerate traditional hemodialysis has, because of its recent availability, been raised. Ther apy of HRS continues to be one of the most intriguing and vexing problems in clinical medicine. The use of hemodialysis with polyacrylonitrile membranes may be helpful in certain patients with HRS, especially in those with acute reversible liver injury. Although the peri toneovenous shunt has been reported to correct the renal functional disturbance, the results of the only two controlled studies available are inconclusive.

Liver disease is frequently accompanied by a variety of alterations in renal function and electrolyte me tabolism [1]. These complications of liver disease range in severity from the clinically unimportant to problems requiring prompt and vigorous thera peutic intervention. In the present review, empha sis is placed on the management of the abnor malities of renal sodium handling and on acute intrinsic renal failure (ATN) and the hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), which often supervene in patients with severe liver disease. The reader is referred to Epstein [1,2] and Perez and colleagues [3] for more detailed expositions of the use of dialysis and ultrafiltration in treating renal complications of liver disease.

Efficacy of peritoneovenous shunt for treating tolvaptan-resistant refractory ascites in a cirrhotic patient with portal vein thrombosis: A case report

Peritoneovenous shunt is normally used for the treatment of refractory ascites. However, its efficacy in treating tolvaptan-resistant refractory ascites has not been reported thus far. In addition, the impact of peritoneovenous shunt on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients remains controversial. In the present report, a case of tolvaptan-resistant refractory ascites associated with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis is described. The male patient was diagnosed with hepatitis C virus-related liver cirrhosis at the age of 51 years. At the age of 56 years, the patient developed portal vein thrombosis, resulting in the development of refractory ascites. Since the ascites was resistant to treatment with a low-sodium diet and diuretics such as tolvaptan, a peritoneovenous shunt was implanted upon obtaining consent. The shunt immediately increased the urine volume, and the ascites was markedly decreased. The patient's body weight decreased from 62.7 to 57.1 kg in 2 days, and his ascites symptom inventory-7 score decreased from 23 to 0 points in 31 days. Although the patient succumbed to sepsis on day 486 following the shunt implant, his activities of daily living were preserved until 8 days prior to mortality. Thus, the present case supports the efficacy of peritoneovenous shunt for the treatment of tolvaptan-resistant refractory ascites associated with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis. Furthermore, the present case suggests that peritoneovenous shunt may prolong the survival of cirrhotic patents with refractory ascites.

Surgical technology and pharmacology of hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy

Although cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) have not been shown to be effective by themselves, as a combined treatment they are now standard of care for peritoneal metastases from appendiceal cancer and from colorectal cancer as well as peritoneal mesothelioma. The timing of the HIPEC in relation to the CRS is crucial in that the HIPEC is to destroy minimal residual disease that remains following the CRS and prevent microscopic tumor emboli within the abdomen and pelvis from implanting within the resection site, within fibrinous clot, or within blood clot. Proper selection of chemotherapy agents is crucial to the long-term benefit of CRS and HIPEC. One must consider the response expected with the cancer chemotherapy agent, its area under the curve (AUC) ratio indicating the amount of dose intensity within the peritoneal space, and the drug retention within the peritoneal space for a prolonged exposure. Hyperthermia will augment the cytotoxicity of the cancer chemotherapy agents and improve drug penetration. Irrigation techniques should not be overlooked as an important means of reducing the cancer cell burden within the abdomen and pelvis. Multiple technologies for HIPEC exist and these have advantages and disadvantages. The techniques vary from a totally open technique with a vapor barrier over the open abdominal space to a totally closed technique whereby the HIPEC is administered at the completion of the surgical procedure. The open techniques depend on a table-mounted retractor for suspension of the skin edges allowing a reservoir to occur within the abdomen and pelvis. There are nearly a dozen commercially available hyperthermia pumps, all of which seem to perform adequately for HIPEC although there is a variable degree of convenience and documentation of the HIPEC procedure. As the management of peritoneal metastases has progressed over three decades, early cases are now seen in which a laparoscopic CRS and HIPEC may be appropriate. Also, prophylactic use of laparoscopic HIPEC with perforated appendiceal malignancies and T4 colon cancers may be appropriate.

Successful Treatment of Ascites using a Denver® Peritoneovenous Shunt in a Patient with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria and Budd-Chiari syndrome

A 56-year-old man was diagnosed with aplastic anemia and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria at 43 years of age and treatment with cyclosporin A was started. Liver cirrhosis, ascites, and thrombus in the hepatic veins were found at 56 years of age and Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) was diagnosed according to angiography findings. He was treated with diuretics and paracentesis was performed several times, but with limited efficacy. A Denver^® peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) was inserted into the right jugular vein; his ascites and renal function improved immediately and his general condition has remained good for 12 months since starting the above treatment regimen. A PVS is a treatment option for ascites due to BCS.

Treatment and management of ascites and hepatorenal syndrome: an update

Ascites and renal dysfunction are frequent complications experienced by patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Ascites is the pathologic accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity, and is one of the cardinal signs of portal hypertension. The diagnostic evaluation of ascites involves assessment of its granulocyte count and protein concentration to exclude complications such as infection or malignoma and to allow risk stratification for the development of spontaneous peritonitis. Although sodium restriction and diuretics remain the cornerstone of the management of ascites, many patients require additional therapy when they become refractory to this treatment. In this situation, the treatment of choice is repeated large-volume paracentesis. Alteration in splanchnic hemodynamics is one of the most important changes underlying the development of ascites. Further splanchnic dilation leads to changes in systemic hemodynamics, activating vasopressor agents and leading to decreased renal perfusion. Small alterations in renal function influence the prognosis, which depends on the cause of renal failure. Prerenal failure is evident in about 70% of patients, whereas in about 30% of patients the cause is hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), which is associated with a worse prognosis. Therefore, effective therapy is of great clinical importance. Recent data indicate that use of the new definition of acute kidney injury facilitates the identification and treatment of patients with renal insufficiency more rapidly than use of the current criteria for HRS. In this review article, we evaluate approaches to the management of patients with ascites and HRS.

Peritoneovenous shunt scintigraphy to assess shunt patency in patients with refractory ascites

Peritoneovenous shunt scintigraphy is an infrequently performed study to non-invasively assess shunt patency in patients with recurrent or refractory ascites in cirrhotic patients. We describe two patients of chronic liver disease in whom (99m)Tc-macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy was performed to assess the patency of peritoneovenous shunt. Visualization of lung activity was interpreted as indicative of shunt patency. While both lungs were visualized almost immediately in the first patient, they were visualized by 30 min in the second patient. Visualization of radiolabeled peritoneal fluid in the entire length of the shunt tubing may be variable, and was seen in only one patient. Scintigraphy also helped in excluding communication between the ascites and right groin collection in the second patient.

Percutaneous placement and management of peritoneovenous shunts

Peritoneovenous shunts are used in the treatment of recurrent ascites or recurrent pleural effusions. Generally speaking, the shunts allow passage of ascites or pleural effusions (by either passive or active means) back into the central venous system. The most recent development in peritoneovenous shunts, known as the Denver Shunt, is a modification of a shunt developed for the treatment of hydrocephalus. In recent years, the Denver shunt has been placed by interventional radiologists. It is used to treat both cirrhotic and malignant effusions in the peritoneal and pleural cavities. Reported complications of the shunt are shunt occlusion, infection, post-shunt coagulopathy, deep vein thrombosis, catheter breakage, and leaks. This article discusses the technical aspects related to the percutaneous placement and maintenance of the Denver Shunt.

Meeting the challenge of ascites in ovarian cancer: new avenues for therapy and research

Malignant ascites presents a considerable clinical challenge to the management of ovarian cancer, but also provides a wealth of opportunities for translational research. The accessibility of ascitic fluid and its cellular components make it an excellent source of tumour tissue for the investigation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers, pharmacodynamic markers and for molecular profiling analysis. In this Opinion article, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of its pathophysiology, the development of new methods to characterize its molecular features and how these findings can be used to improve the treatment of malignant ascites, particularly in the context of ovarian cancer.

Percutaneous placement and management of the Denver shunt for portal hypertensive ascites

OBJECTIVE

Many patients with cirrhotic effusions in the peritoneal and pleural spaces lead a difficult existence. In addition to their decreased mobility and physical discomfort, they spend hours in the hospital or an outpatient facility undergoing peritoneal and pleural drainage. Liver transplantation is the ultimate solution for those with cirrhotic effusions refractory to medical management; however, most are on a long waiting list, forcing them to undergo a year or more of percutaneous centesis. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts offer relief to those with cirrhotic ascites but at the cost of accelerated hepatic failure and hepatic encephalopathy. This article will review the development of the peritoneovenous and pleurovenous shunt, discuss reasons for its loss of favor, and suggest its current role in the armamentarium of the interventional radiologist.

CONCLUSION

Peritoneovenous and pleurovenous shunt creation is a procedure that has the potential to significantly improve the quality of life of the patient by controlling the fluid collections, reducing dependence on frequent drainage procedures, improving renal function, and reducing protein loss.

Peritoneovenous shunting for refractory ascites results in worsening of nephrotic syndrome

Peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) is accepted as a treatment for refractory ascites due to liver cirrhosis. Infection is a well-known complication of shunting. However, the effects of PVS in terms of complications for renal disease are unclear. We encountered a case involving a 52-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis and complications of nephrotic syndrome that were worsened by PVS. He received PVS for refractory ascites due to alcoholic liver cirrhosis before coming to our hospital for evaluation for liver transplantation. Nephrotic syndrome was then identified due to cirrhosis-related membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN). Prednisolone was administrated at 60 mg/day for MPGN. On day 5, he showed grade IV hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven criteria). Tapering prednisolone and intestinal cleansing with lactulose treatment improved hepatic encephalopathy, but hyperammonemia persisted and the PVS was removed. After shunt removal, urinary protein levels decreased from 4-6 g/day to 0.3-0.5 g/day and ammonia levels decreased. PVS may increase the excretion of urinary protein and increase ammonia levels in patients with complications of glomerulonephritis.

Denver peritoneovenous shunts for the management of malignant ascites: a review of the literature in the post LeVeen Era

Most case series describing peritoneovenous (PV) shunts for malignant ascites include both LeVeen and Denver shunts. Conclusions based on these studies are no longer clinically relevant since the LeVeen shunt has been discontinued. The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes specific to Denver shunts to establish expected results in the modern era. Case series describing PV shunts for malignant ascites between 1980 and 2008 were identified through a keyword PUBMED search. Whenever possible, results attributable to Denver shunts were abstracted and analyzed. Nineteen series describing 341 patients undergoing 353 Denver PV shunts for malignant ascites were identified. The primary indications for PV shunts were unspecified or cancers of unknown origin (40%), ovarian cancer (16%), and pancreatic cancer (8%). Primary patency averaged 87 ± 57 days. Seventy-four per cent of patients died with functioning shunts. Complications occurred in 38% of patients including occlusion (24%) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (9%). Average survival of all patients was 3.0 ± 1.7 months and shunts provided effective palliation in 75.3%. One and a half per cent of 133 patients who had autopsies were reported to have hematologic dissemination. These results are not statistically different than overall results reported for both shunts combined or LeVeen shunts alone. Studies that report combined outcomes with Denver and LeVeen shunts for malignant ascites are neither negatively, nor positively influenced by one specific shunt. Expectations following PV shunting for malignant ascites do not have to be revised because LeVeen shunts are no longer available.

[Pathogenesis and management of refractory malignant ascites]

Malignant ascites are the cancer-associated accumulation of fluids in the peritoneal cavity. The neoplasms most frequently associated with ascites are ovarian, breast, colon, stomach and pancreas adenocarcinomas. Symptoms are abdominal distention, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dyspnea and limbs oedemas. Several pathophysiological mechanisms might be implicated such as peritoneal carcinomatosis, lymphatic vessels' obstruction, portal hypertension or heart failure. Its diagnosis is most often performed in a context of already known neoplasia. Malignant ascites are associated with a pejorative evolution. Ascites which cannot be mobilized or show early recurrence and cannot be prevented by medical treatment are defined as refractory ascites. Therefore, management of refractory malignant ascites takes place in the context of palliative care and aims at improving the quality of life of these patients. This review lists the current data reported on the pathophysiology of malignant ascites and describes the present and future options for refractory malignant ascites management.

The use of peritoneal venous shunting for intractable neonatal ascites: a short case series

INTRODUCTION

Intractable ascites in neonates has a varied etiology; and often, the cause is idiopathic. The management usually consists of observation, diuretics, paracentesis, albumin replacements, and self correction. However, in some cases, the above treatment remains unsuccessful.

RESULTS

We present 2 cases of intractable ascites causing metabolic abnormalities, severe protein and immunoglobulin loss, and respiratory compromise. Although the use of peritoneovenous shunts for intractable ascites has been reported previously, our cases differ in both technique and patient size. Our first patient is an ex-28-week premature, 1.4-kg infant with intractable ascites for which a peritoneal drain was initially placed. After 3 weeks and putting out nearly 300 mL of ascitic fluid daily, we placed a peritoneal venous shunt attached to a Medtronic pump. A 6.6F Broviac was placed through the Internal Jugular. The Medtronic pump was placed subcutaneously on the right chest. The pump was compressed 5 to 10 times every 8 hours, keeping fluid actively being infused from the belly to the vascular system. The second patient was 5 months old, 2.8 kg, with a course complicated by necrotizing enterocolitis, prolonged total parenteral nutrition, and progressive liver failure and underwent the same procedure. Both patients had dramatic responses to the shunting postoperatively, with clinical, radiographic, and laboratory evidence of resolution of the ascites. The first patient had the shunt removed at 6 months of age and continues to do well, whereas our second patient had no recurrence of the ascites, but died about 1 year later from cardiopulmonary complications.

CONCLUSION

These 2 cases demonstrate that peritoneovenous shunting, with the assistance of a Medtronic pump, is an effective treatment of intractable neonatal ascites and should be considered early in the course before complications develop.

Feasibility of externalized peritoneovenous shunt (EPVS) for malignant ascites

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new modified peritoneovenous shunt therapy, the externalized peritoneovenous shunt (EPVS) system placement, used to treat patients with malignant ascites.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 10 patients, who were not suited for conventional peritoneovenous shunts (PVS), with malignant ascites, which was refractory to medical therapies. Patient characteristics, technical success, efficacy, duration of EPVS placement, adverse events, and outcome were evaluated. Clinical efficacy of the EPVS was evaluated by the change in subjective symptoms.

RESULTS

The primary reasons for applying EPVS were severe anasarca in 4 patients, potential PVS dysfunction in 3 patients, poor performance status in 2 patients, and a history of PVS occlusion in 1 patient. EPVS was successfully placed in all patients, and it provided clinical efficacy in 8 patients (80%). Early death occurred within 7 days after EPVS placement in 2 patients because of renal failure. The median duration of EPVS placement was 10.4 days (range, 2-28 days). In 6 patients (60%), the EPVS was exchanged to conventional PVS sequentially, since the initial EPVS placement resulted in an improvement of the subjective symptoms of the patients, without serious complications.

CONCLUSION

EPVS placement may be an option for patients with malignant ascites who may not be appropriate for conventional PVS placement.

Reinfusion of ascites during hemodialysis as a treatment of massive refractory ascites and acute renal failure

Refractory ascites can occur in patients with various conditions. Although several procedures based on the reinfusion of ascitic fluid have been reported after the failure of bed rest, salt and water restriction, diuretics, intravenous administration of albumin, and repeated paracentesis, these procedures are performed for ascitic fluid removal without dialytic effect. In this study, a flow control reinfusion of ascites during hemodialysis (HD) was performed to demonstrate the efficacy of this method in a lupus patient with massive refractory ascites and respiratory and acute renal failure (ARF). The alleviation of ascites and ARF attests to the success of the flow control reinfusion of ascites during HD. This procedure can control the rate of ascites and body fluid removal simultaneously during HD using the roller pump. In conclusion, with a normal coagulation profile, the procedure of flow control reinfusion of ascites during HD is an effective alternative treatment for the alleviation of refractory ascites with renal failure.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of pediatric ascites

The pediatric population has a number of unique considerations related to the diagnosis and treatment of ascites. This review summarizes the physiologic mechanisms for cirrhotic and noncirrhotic ascites and provides a comprehensive list of reported etiologies stratified by the patient's age. Characteristic findings on physical examination, diagnostic imaging, and abdominal paracentesis are also reviewed, with particular attention to those aspects that are unique to children. Medical and surgical treatments of ascites are discussed. Both prompt diagnosis and appropriate management of ascites are required to avoid associated morbidity and mortality.

Novel cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (KM-CART) for refractory ascites associated with cancerous peritonitis: its effect and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

We have actively carried out cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) for refractory ascites. However, with conventional CART, the membrane becomes clogged after processing about 2 L of cancerous ascites fluid due to the fact that it is rich in cellular and mucous components; it is therefore difficult to process the entire volume of collected ascites.

METHODS

We developed KM-CART which includes a membrane cleaning function, and applied it in 73 cases of cancerous ascites, after its basic functions had been evaluated in 11 cases of refractory cancerous ascites.

RESULTS

On average, using KM-CART, 6.4 L (range 1.7-14.9 L) of ascites were filtrated and concentrated to 0.8 L (0.2-2.0 L) in 57 min (5-129 min); the membrane was cleaned an average of three times (range 0-10 times) and this enabled the processing of more ascites in a shorter period. In addition, the circuit and the handling were both markedly simple, and fever, which has been the most notable adverse effect with the conventional system, was not an issue.

CONCLUSION

Since KM-CART was safe and is expected to improve the subjective symptoms and general condition of the patient, it is proposed that this novel system should actively be used not only for palliation but also as supplementary treatment for cancerous peritonitis.

Persistent ascites can be effectively treated by peritoneovenous shunts

AIM

The aim the study was to review our experience and determine the effectiveness of peritoneovenous shunts in the management of persistent ascites.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who had a peritoneovenous shunt inserted for persistent ascites in our institution over 32 years (1977-2010) was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one peritoneovenous shunts were inserted into 25 patients. Records from 22 were available. Median age was 34 months (range, 1 month-12 years), with median duration of ascites of 1.75 months (range, 3 weeks-2.5 years). Sixteen had previous abdominal surgery, whereas one had previous thoracic surgery. Other underlying pathologies included hepatitis (n = 2), lymphohistiocytosis, lymphatic hypoplasia, and carcinomatosis. One was regarded as idiopathic. Previous management consisted of paracentesis (n = 15), dietary modification (n = 11), diuretics (n = 9), and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (n = 4). One underwent fetal drainage of ascites. No intraoperative complications occurred. Eight (36%) had postoperative complications, including shunt occlusion (n = 2), pulmonary edema (n = 2), infection (n = 2), and wound leakage (n = 1). One developed a varix following shunt removal. The ascites resolved after shunting in 20 (91%) of the 22 children. Four died from their underlying pathology. In children with malignancy, the shunt allowed prompt resumption in treatment schedule.

CONCLUSION

This represents the largest series of children receiving peritoneovenous shunt for persistent ascites. It is a safe and effective treatment which should be considered early.

Peritoneovenous shunt for intractable ascites due to hepatic lymphorrhea after hepatectomy

A peritoneovenous shunt has become one of the most efficient procedures for intractable ascites due to liver cirrhosis. A case of intractable ascites due to hepatic lymphorrhea after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma that was successfully treated by the placement of a peritoneovenous shunt is presented. A 72-year-old Japanese man underwent partial resection of the liver for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis C viral infection. After hepatectomy, a considerable amount of ascites ranging from 800-4600 mL per day persisted despite conservative therapy, including numerous infusions of albumin and plasma protein fraction and administration of diuretics. Since the patient’s general condition deteriorated, based on the diagnosis of intractable hepatic lymphorrhea, a subcutaneous peritoneovenous shunt was inserted. The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful and the ascites decreased rapidly, with serum total protein and albumin levels and hepatic function improving accordingly. For intractable ascites due to hepatic lymphorrhea after hepatectomy, we recommend the placement of a peritoneovenous shunt as a procedure that can provide immediate effectiveness without increased surgical risk.

Portale Hypertension

Während die Pathologie, die zur portalen Hypertension führt, im prähepatischen, hepatischen und posthepatischen venösen Gefäßbett liegen kann, machen die intrahepatischen Erkrankungen mit Abstand den Großteil aus. In unseren Breitengraden ist es die durch Alkoholabusus bedingte ethyltoxische Leberzirrhose, weltweit die durch Infektionen (HCV, HBV) bedingten Zirrhosen. Die chronische Hepatitis C mit ihren Komplikationen (Leberzellversagen, portale Hypertension und hepatozelluläres Karzinom) wird in den kommenden Jahren trotz moderner Therapieverfahren noch an Bedeutung gewinnen.

Radiological insertion of Denver peritoneovenous shunts for malignant refractory ascites: a retrospective multicenter study (JIVROSG-0809)

PURPOSE

Peritoneal venous shunts (PVSs) are widely used for palliating symptoms of refractory malignant ascites and are recognized as one of the practical methods. However, reliable clinical data are insufficient because most previous reports have been small studies from single centers. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiologically placed PVSs in patients with malignant refractory ascites.

METHODS

A total of 133 patients with malignant ascites refractory to medical therapies were evaluated for patient characteristics, technical success, efficacy, survival times, adverse events, and changes in laboratory data.

RESULTS

PVSs were successfully placed in all patients and were effective (i.e., improvement of ascites symptoms lasting 7 days or more) in 110 (82.7%). The median duration of symptom palliation was 26 days and median survival time was 41 days. The most frequent adverse event was PVS dysfunction, which occurred in 60 (45.1%) patients, among whom function was recovered with an additional minimally invasive procedure in 9. Abnormalities in coagulation (subclinical disseminated intravascular coagulation) occurred in 37 (27.8%) patients, although only 7 (5.3%) developed clinical disseminated intravascular coagulation. Other major adverse events were gastrointestinal bleeding (9.8%), sepsis (3.8%), and acute heart failure (3.0%). PVS was least effective in patients with elevated serum creatinine, bloody ascites, or gynecologic tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiological PVS is a technically feasible and effective method for palliating the symptoms from refractory malignant ascites, but preoperative evaluation and monitoring the postprocedural complications are mandatory to preclude severe adverse events after PVS.

Laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of refractory malignant ascites: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis in 52 patients

Malignant ascites is a debilitating condition affecting cancer patients in their terminal stage of disease. Recently, laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) was introduced as a new approach. From September 2001 to August 2008, 52 patients were treated with this new modality. No treatment-related mortality was observed. Median survival was 98 days. One patient developed a clinical recurrence. Laparoscopic HIPEC is a safe and effective method for palliating malignant ascites.

Percutaneous peritoneovenous shunt for treatment of refractory ascites

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of a percutaneously placed peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) in patients with refractory ascites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Under fluoroscopic and ultrasonographic (US) guidance, the authors placed a PVS in 55 patients (39 men and 16 women; mean age, 56 years) with refractory ascites and symptomatic abdominal distention. The cause of ascites was liver cirrhosis (n = 36), carcinomatosis (n = 17), ruptured cysts with polycystic kidney disease (n = 1), and idiopathic refractory ascites (n = 1). The authors retrospectively evaluated technical feasibility, shunt patency, complications, and clinical outcomes of each patient.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%, and symptomatic improvement was achieved in all but one patient. Complications occurred in 17 of the 55 patients (31%): five patients had variceal bleeding; three patients had ascites leakage; two patients each had disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, transient abdominal pain, shunt infection, and venous thrombosis; and one patient had pulmonary thromboembolism. Thirty patients (54%) died 2-690 days after the procedure (mean, 117 days), and their lifetime shunt patency was 84%. Eight patients were lost to follow-up. Seventeen patients were alive for 60-1,200 days, and their shunt patency was 71%. There was no significant difference in shunt patency between the two groups with benign and malignant ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

The percutaneous placement of a PVS was a technically feasible and effective method for symptomatic relief of refractory ascites.

Peritoneovenous shunting for intractable chylous ascites complicated with lymphangioleiomyomatosis

A 38-year-old woman was admitted due to lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)-associated massive chylous ascites and progressive cachexia. She was incidentally diagnosed to have ascites during her regular physical check-up two years previously and LAM was revealed as its underlying cause. Periodic paracentesis was required to ameliorate ascites-associated symptoms, but resulted in lymphocytopenia, malnutrition, and deterioration of general status. Ascites was refractory to diuretics and fat-restricted diet. Peritoneovenous shunt (Denver shunt) was placed and thereafter ascites has been managed successfully without any complications for one year after the placement. Peritoneovenous shunt should be considered in LAM patients whose chylous ascites can not be managed with conservative treatments.

Peritoneovenous shunts for palliation of malignant ascites

BACKGROUND

Malignant ascites may produce a cluster of symptoms that include abdominal distention, early satiety, respiratory embarrassment, impaired mobility, and lethargy, and relief of these symptoms is often difficult to achieve. We report on the placement of peritoneovenous shunts (PVSs) in a group of patients with malignant ascites, with particular reference to the effectiveness and complications of the procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

PVSs were inserted in 9 patients with malignant ascites after obtaining their informed consent. The patients were 6 men and 3 women with a median age of 59 years. All had previously been treated with vigorous diuretic therapy or repeated paracentesis or both. Shunt insertion was carried out via a percutaneous approach under local anesthesia.

RESULTS

The procedure was well tolerated by all patients. The abdominal distention resolved in all patients, and urine volume increased significantly, demonstrating that the PVS did not affect renal function. The platelet count was reduced, and prothrombin time was prolonged. Two patients had the complication of shunt occlusion, and both patients underwent shunt replacement. There were no lethal complications. Median survival time after PVS placement was 21 days (range, 10 approximately 90 days), and the shunt was functioning at the time of death with good control of ascites in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant ascites produces troublesome symptoms for patients, who may live for some time. Placement of a PVS is a well-tolerated, relatively minor surgical procedure that can provide excellent control of ascites in most patients selected. The selection of optimal patients requires further study.

Treatment of malignant ascites in patients with advanced cancer: peritoneovenous shunt versus paracentesis

BACKGROUND

Malignant ascites in patients with advanced cancer is often difficult to treat and effective palliation is not achieved.

METHODS

We performed peritoneovenous shunt (PVS) placement in patients with malignant ascites, who were admitted to our institution between January 2000 and March 2005. The outcome of PVS placement was compared with paracentesis as a treatment option during the same period. Comparisons included changes in abdominal girth, hematocrit (Hct), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cr) measurements before and after PVS placement. The number of procedures, changes in the postoperative performance score, the median survival, possibility of discharge, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent PVS placement and 49 patients were subjected to paracentesis. After PVS, abdominal girth and Hct decreased significantly. BUN and Cr tended to decrease. The median number of procedures was less in the PVS group than in the paracentesis group (one vs two, respectively; P < 0.0001). The postoperative performance score showed a significant improvement following PVS placement (P = 0.0026). Median survival was significantly longer for patients undergoing PVS placement than for those undergoing paracentesis (42 days vs 18 days, respectively; P = 0.003). The rate of possible discharge was significantly higher for patients undergoing PVS placement (P = 0.0076). Severe complications were observed in one patient in the PVS group and in seven patients in the paracentesis group.

CONCLUSIONS

PVS placement provides an effective treatment option for patients with refractory malignant ascites in advanced cancer, and yields a higher likelihood of discharge compared with conventional paracentesis.