Current status of conventional (open) cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Effect of simethicone for the management of early abdominal distension after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter retrospective propensity score matching study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether simethicone expediates the remission of abdominal distension after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

This retrospective study involved LC patients who either received perioperative simethicone treatment or not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to minimize bias. The primary endpoint was the remission rate of abdominal distension within 24 h after LC. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors affecting the early remission of abdominal distension after LC. Subsequently, a prediction model was established and validated.

RESULTS

A total of 1,286 patients were divided into simethicone (n = 811) and non-simethicone groups (n = 475) as 2:1 PSM. The patients receiving simethicone had better remission rates of abdominal distension at both 24 h and 48 h after LC (49.2% vs. 34.7%, 83.9% vs. 74.8%, respectively), along with shorter time to the first flatus (14.6 ± 11.1 h vs. 17.2 ± 9.1 h, P < 0.001) compared to those without. Multiple logistic regression identified gallstone (OR = 0.33, P = 0.001), cholecystic polyp (OR = 0.53, P = 0.050), preoperative abdominal distention (OR = 0.63, P = 0.002) and simethicone use (OR = 1.89, P < 0.001) as independent factors contributing to the early remission of abdominal distension following LC. The prognosis model developed for predicting remission rates of abdominal distension within 24 h after LC yielded an area under the curve of 0.643 and internal validation a value of 0.644.

CONCLUSIONS

Simethicone administration significantly enhanced the early remission of post-LC abdominal distension, particularly for patients who had gallstones, cholecystic polyp, prolonged anesthesia or preoperative abdominal distention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2200064964 (24/10/2022).

Comparison of the effect of propofol and isoflurane on hemodynamic parameters and stress response hormones during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy surgery

Background and Aims:

General anesthesia induces endocrine, immunologic, and metabolic responses. Anesthetic drugs affect endocrine system by changing the level of stress hormones and hemodynamic of the patient . The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of propofol and isoflurane on hemodynamic parameters and stress-induced hormones in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) surgery.

Material and Methods:

Seventy patients of elective LC were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups of 35 patients; group P received propofol (70–120 μg/kg/min) and group I received isoflurane (mac: 1.28%) as anesthesia maintenance. The following parameters were monitored, checked, and recorded from preanesthesia period to 10 min after PACU entry according to a planned method: hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean atrial pressure), level of blood sugar, and serum epinephrine level.

Results:

Heart rate and mean atrial pressure changes did not show significant differences between the two groups in all stage (P > 0.05), but isoflurane group tolerated lower fluctuating changes. Blood glucose and serum epinephrine level rise in the isoflurane group were significantly higher than the propofol group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Maintenance anesthesia by inhalation gas base on isoflurane has not shown a significant difference with total intravenous anesthesia base on propofol on hemodynamic parameter. However, propofol has a consistent effect on decreasing stress hormone and suggested for LC surgery.

Comparison of the Effect of Propofol and Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Parameters and Stress Response Hormones During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery

Background

General anesthesia induces endocrine, immunologic, and metabolic responses. Anesthetic drugs affect the endocrine system by changing the level of stress hormones and hemodynamic variables of the patient.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic parameters and stress-induced hormones in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) surgery.

Methods

Seventy patients of elective LC were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups of propofol (75 µg/kg/min) and dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg/hour) as anesthesia maintenance. Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean atrial pressure), blood sugar, and serum epinephrine level were monitored and recorded from pre-anesthesia period to 10 min after entry to post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) according to a planned method.

Results

Heart rate and mean atrial pressure changes were significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group in all stages compared to propofol group (P < 0.001). Also, the rises in blood glucose and serum epinephrine levels in the dexmedetomidine group were significantly higher than in the propofol group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Anesthesia maintenance by dexmedetomidine showed a significant difference in hemodynamic parameters in comparison with propofol. While dexmedetomidine had better effects on controlling hemodynamic parameters, propofol showed better effects on decreasing stress hormones, and it can be suggested for LC surgery.

Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: A way of getting out of trouble

Aims: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is currently the standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones. In the presence of moderate to severe inflammation when dissection of the cholecystohepatic triangle cannot be safely achieved, laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC) has been proposed as an alternative to open conversion to prevent bile duct injuries. The aim of this study is to review our experience of the technique. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under the upper gastrointestinal surgical unit at Westmead Hospital was undertaken. The study included all emergency and elective cases during a period from February 2012 to February 2014. Demographic, clinical, operative and postoperative characteristics including operative technique, placement of a drain, complications, length of hospital stay and histopathology were collected. Results: A total of 404 patients underwent LC during the two year study period of which 23 were LPC's. Patients who underwent LPC tended to be older and more likely of the male gender. These patients were also more likely to be an emergency operation and have a higher ASA grade compared to the LC group. Length of stay and operative time tended to be longer. There were five (22%) bile leaks postoperatively and all were successfully managed with postoperative ERCP and stenting. The major complication rate was 35% (8/23) with no bile duct injury or perioperative mortality. Conclusion: This current case series adds further evidence to suggest that LPC is a viable alternative to conversion in cases of difficult LC.

Endoscopic management of biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the procedure of choice for management of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Although it has distinct advantages over open cholecystectomy, bile leak is more common. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the diagnostic and therapeutic modality of choice for management of postcholecystectomy bile leaks and has a high success rate with the placement of plastic biliary stents. Repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with placement of multiple plastic stents, a covered metal stent, or possibly cyanoacrylate therapy may be effective in refractory cases. This review will discuss the indications, efficacy, and complications of endoscopic therapy.

The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient's opinion favours single-port laparoscopy

INTRODUCTION:

Single-port laparoscopy is prospected as the future of minimal invasive surgery. It is hypothesised to cause less post operative pain, with a shorter hospitalisation period and improved cosmetic results. Population- and patient-based opinion is important for the adaptation of new techniques. This study aimed to assess the opinion and perception of a healthy population and a patient population on single-port laparoscopy compared with conventional laparoscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

An anonymous 33-item questionnaire, describing conventional and single-port laparoscopy, was given to 101 patients and 104 healthy volunteers. The survey participants (median age 44 years; range 17-82 years) were asked questions about their personal situation and their expectations and perceptions of the two different surgical techniques; conventional multi-port laparoscopy and single-port laparoscopy.

RESULTS:

A total of 72% of the participants had never heard of single-port laparoscopy before. The most important concern in both groups was the risk of surgical complications. When complication risks remain similar, 80% prefers single-port laparoscopy to conventional laparoscopy. When the risk of complications increases from 1% to 10%, 43% of all participants prefer single-port laparoscopy. A total of 70% of the participants are prepared to receive treatment in another hospital if single-port surgery is not performed in their hometown hospital. The preference for single-port approach was higher in the female population.

CONCLUSION:

Although cure and safety remain the main concerns, the population and patients group have a favourable perception of single-port surgery. The impact of public opinion and patient perception towards innovative techniques is undeniable. If the safety of the two different procedures is similar, this study shows a positive attitude of both participant groups in favour of single-port laparoscopy. However, solid scientific proof for the safety and feasibility of this new surgical technique needs to be obtained before this procedure can be implemented into everyday practice.

Intravenous paracetamol for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Although opioids are the main choice for acute postoperative pain control, many side effects have been reported for them. NSAIDs and paracetamol have been used extensively as alternatives, and it seems that they are more effective for minor to moderate pain control postoperatively when have been used alone or in combination with opioids. As laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses moderate pain postoperatively, this study was planned to assess whether paracetamol is able to provide effective analgesia as a sole analgesic at least in the first few hours post operatively.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effect of intravenous Paracetamol on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a randomized double- blind clinical trial study. 30 patients ASA class I, aged 18 to 50 years, candidate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recruited, and randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A (paracetamol group) received 1 gr paracetamol and group B received placebo ten minutes after the induction of anesthesia. 0.1 mg/Kg Morphine was administered intravenously based on patients compliant and pain score >3. Pain score and the opioids consumption were recorded in the first six hours postoperative. Patient's pain was measured by the VAS (Visual Analog Scale).

RESULTS

The pain score was lower in group A (P= 0.01), but the morphine consumption showed no significant difference between the groups (P= 0.24) during the first 6 hours postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although paracetamol (1gr) has caused a better pain relief quality but it is not a suitable analgesic for moderate pain control in acute phase after surgery alone.

Avaliação dos níveis séricos de interleucina-6 e interleucina-10 nos pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica versus convencional

OBJETIVO: Correlacionar a dosagem sérica pré-operatória e pós-operatória de interleucina-6 (IL-6) e interleucina-10 (IL-10) entre pacientes submetidos à colecistectomia laparotômica versus videolaparoscópica. MÉTODOS: De um total de 20 pacientes, 18 foram incluídos no estudo, sendo nove submetidos à colecistectomia laparoscópica e os outros nove utilizando a técnica laparotômica. As concentrações séricas de IL-6 e IL-10 foram dosadas em ambos os grupos. As amostras de sangue foram obtidas nos tempos de 24 horas no pré-operatório, quatro, 12 e 24 horas após o procedimento. Os grupos foram comparados em relação à idade, sexo, índice de massa corpórea (IMC), tempo de anestesia e de operação. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferenças significativamente estatísticas entre os grupos relacionadas à idade, sexo, IMC, tempo de anestesia e de operação. A comparação entre a colecistectomia laparotômica e laparoscópica demonstrou diferenças estatísticas nos níveis de IL-6 no tempo 12 horas após operação (218,64pg/ml laparotômica versus 67,71pg/ml laparoscópica, p=0,0003) e IL-10 no tempo de 24 horas após o procedimento (24,46pg/ml aberta versus 10,17pg/ml laparoscópica, p <0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Houve aumento das dosagens de interleucinas-6 e 10 após o trauma cirúrgico. Ocorreu aumento significativo dos níveis das interleucinas analisadas no grupo laparotômico em comparação com o grupo laparoscópico.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Combined Analysis of Resident and Attending Learning Curves at a Single Institution

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is a recent technical modification on standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy that has been shown to be safe and feasible. Recent studies suggest that experienced laparoscopic surgeons have a short learning curve to become proficient in SILC. However, little is known about the interaction of the learning curves of residents and attending surgeons at academic programs. We prospectively evaluated various metrics of both attending and resident surgeons as they progressed in their experience with SILC. Patients were placed into cohorts of 25 based on teaching surgeon experience. Data recorded included patient-specific and operative variables along with complications, conversion to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and outcomes. One hundred one patients underwent SILC. Twelve per cent of patients required conversion to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. No significant difference was found in operative times compared within the experience-based cohorts ( P = 0.21). A reduction in operative time was shown in residents who were proficient in standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) along their learning curve. Operative times remained the same for the teaching surgeon regardless of experience of resident surgeon. SILC has a short learning curve for resident surgeons who are proficient in standard laparoscopic surgery. SILC can be effectively taught with few complications and outcomes similar to SLC with preservation of operative efficiency and safety. Further studies are warranted, however, at a national/international level to define the place and use for SILC as well as the incorporation of single-incision techniques into resident curriculum.

Delayed assessment and eager adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Implications for developing surgical technologies

Despite the prevailing emphasis in the medical literature on establishing evidence, many changes in the practice of surgery have not been achieved using proper evidence-based assessment. This paper examines the adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) into regular use for the treatment of cholecystitis and the process of its acceptance, focusing on the limited role of technology assessment in its appraisal. A review of the published medical literature concerning LC was performed. Approximately 3000 studies of LC have been conducted since 1985, and there have been nearly 8500 publications to date. As LC was adopted enthusiastically into practice, the results of outcome studies generally showed that it compared favorably with the traditional, open cholecystectomy with regard to mortality, complications, and length of hospital stay. However, despite the rapid general agreement on surgical technique, efficacy, and appropriateness, there remained lingering doubts about safety, outcomes, and cost of the procedure that suggested that essential research questions were ignored even as the procedure became standard. Using LC as a case study, there are important lessons to be learned about the need for important guidelines for surgical innovation and the adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques into current clinical and surgical practice. We highlight one recent example, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and how necessary it is to properly evaluate this new technology before it is accepted as a safe and effective surgical option.

Assessment of need for repeat ERCP during biliary stent removal after clinical resolution of postcholecystectomy bile leak

OBJECTIVES

In patients who have undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary stent placement for postcholecystectomy bile leak there is limited evidence to support the repeat ERCP at the time of stent removal. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with biliary stent removal may suffice. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical course of patients who underwent biliary stent placement for a postcholecystectomy bile leak and determine whether repeat ERCP is necessary.

METHODS

We identified all adult patients who underwent biliary stent placement for postcholecystectomy bile leak from 1 January 1996 to 31 October 2008. Demographic data, cholecystectomy details, and procedural data were collected, specifically focusing on closure of the bile leak. Time to resolution of leak was calculated, up to either the date of the first repeat ERCP that demonstrated no persistent leak or the date of removal of any radiologically placed percutaneous drain, whichever came first.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients underwent repeat ERCP with biliary stent removal. The median time to repeat ERCP was 36 days (interquartile range (IQR) 26-48). Fifty-seven (89%) patients had resolved the leak by time of repeat ERCP. Of those in whom the leak had not resolved, 6 had a repeat exam within 14 days of stent placement; 4 of these resolved the leak by day 39. There were no procedure-related complications in the ERCP group. Thirteen patients underwent EGD with stent removal after a median of 29 days (IQR 23-38). None had adverse events, with a median follow-up of 38 months. Overall, the median time to resolution of biliary leak was 33 days (IQR 22-44). Importantly, repeat ERCP altered the management in only one patient in whom bile duct stones were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with uncomplicated postcholecystectomy bile leak who have clinically resolved their leak do not require cholangiography at the time of stent removal. In these patients, EGD with stent removal at 4-6 weeks seems to be sufficient and significantly less expensive.

ERCP in the management of biliary complications after cholecystectomy

Open cholecystectomy has been associated historically with 0.2% to 0.5% risk of postoperative biliary injury. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which has become the first-line surgical treatment of calculous gallbladder disease, has been associated with a 2.5-fold to fourfold increase in the incidence of postoperative bile duct injury. The biliary endoscopist can expect to see a varied spectrum of complications after cholecystectomy by either technique, including postoperative biliary strictures, bile leaks, and retained calculi in the biliary tree. Proper diagnosis and treatment are paramount in ensuring a satisfactory outcome after bile duct injury. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become the primary modality for treatment and effectively manages most bile duct injuries.

Partial Cholecystectomy in the Setting of Severe Inflammation is an Acceptable Consideration with Few Long-Term Sequelae

Open cholecystectomy is infrequently performed. For the general surgeon, open cholecystectomy is typically performed when a great degree of inflammation precludes safe laparoscopic removal. The degree of inflammation can also lead to an unacceptable risk of common bile duct injury during the dissection of the triangle of Calot. In this situation, the extent of dissection and amount of resection is not well established. We undertook a retrospective review and follow-up telephone questionnaire of all partial cholecystectomies performed. Partial cholecystectomy was performed in 26 cases with open, laparoscopic converted to open, and laparoscopic techniques. Postoperative complications occurred in seven (27%) patients with three (12%) experiencing more than one complication. There was a bile leak in three (12%), subhepatic abscess in three (12%), wound infection in two (8%), and retained common duct stone in one (4%). There were no common bile duct injuries and no deaths. Telephone interviews were conducted with 19 (73%) patients. Average length of follow up was 314 days. At the time of last contact, no ongoing complaints attributable to biliary pain were present. Our data suggest that partial cholecystectomy in the setting of severe inflammation is a reasonable operation with few long-term sequelae, good clinical results, and satisfactory symptom relief.

Laparoscopic colon surgery: unreliability of end-tidal CO2 monitoring

BACKGROUND

The relatively good haemodynamic and respiratory tolerance to abdominal CO(2) insufflation has mostly been observed in healthy patients during short-lasting laparoscopic procedures. End-tidal CO(2) pressure (PetCO(2)) has been shown to be a reliable method to assess arterial CO(2) (PaCO(2)) in the absence of cardio-respiratory disease in this setting. However, no study has investigated whether PetCO(2) is accurately related to PaCO(2) during laparoscopic colon surgery. Indeed, these procedures last longer, prolonging the pneumoperitoneum and requiring a Trendelenburg position. The aim of the present study was to measure the PaCO(2)-PetCO(2) difference over time in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon surgery and to determine whether PaCO(2) is reliably assessed by PetCO(2).

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients (ASA I and II) scheduled for laparoscopic colon surgery were anaesthetized and ventilated to obtain a PetCO(2) between 4.0 and 5.5 kPa. After initiation of CO(2) insufflation, PaCO(2) and PetCO(2) were recorded every 30 min during surgery.

RESULTS

No complication was observed during anaesthesia. The mean arterial pressure increased significantly after CO(2) insufflation and remained steady up to the end of pneumoperitoneum. The heart rate remained stable over time. The relation between PaCO(2) and PetCO(2) was not constant among patients and increased over time within the same patients. The R(2) values fluctuated and did not show a constant correlation between PaCO(2) and PetCO(2).

CONCLUSION

The correlation between PaCO(2) and PetCO(2) during laparoscopic colon surgery is inconsistent mainly due to inter- and intra-individual variability.

Partial Cholecystectomy as a Safe and Viable Option in the Emergency Treatment of Complex Acute Cholecystitis: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Partial cholecystectomy (PC) is an alternative choice to standard cholecystectomy in situations with increased risk of Calot's components injury. We reported our experience with the patients treated with PC and reviewed the literature. Fifty-four patients with complex acute cholecystitis underwent PC, including conventional partial cholecystectomy (CPC; n = 48) and laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy (LPC; n = 6). The clinical diagnosis was verified by ultrasonography. In addition, we reviewed 1190 published cases (1972–2005) who underwent a “nonconventional” surgery for severe cholecystitis, including cholecystostomy, CPC, or LPC. Review of the literature, including our cases, showed a male:female ratio of 1.3:1. The major operative indication was severe acute cholecystitis. Procedures included cholecystostomy (65.8%) and PC (34.2%). In the follow-up (n = 1190), biliary leak (4.8%), retained stones (4.6%), recurrent symptoms (2.3%), wound infections (1.9%), persistent biliary fistula (0.9%), and prolonged biliary drainage (0.2%) were found, with an overall mortality rate of 9.4 per cent. In 133 patients, because of postoperative complications ( e.g., recurrent symptoms, remaining common bile duct stones, or persistence of bile fistula), reoperation was necessary, including 121 cases (90.1%) of cholecystectomy, whereas the other 11 patients underwent other procedures such as common bile duct exploration or closure of the fistula. The surgical trend for complex acute cholecystitis treatment has been changed from only cholecystostomy to a spectrum of cholecystostomy, CPC, and LPC with the progressive increase of PC. The proportion of the LPC compared with CPC has also increased during recent years. It seems that PC is a safe procedure for treating complicated acute cholecystitis. Whether the indication and need for alternative techniques to standard cholecystectomy is changing should be evaluated in future studies.

Mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: which way to go?

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to report the results of a prospective clinical trial investigating traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus "mini-lap" cholecystectomy in a tertiary care University Hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, single-center observational study. Forty-four patients were allocated in each group; patients in group L underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, whereas patients in group M had open "mini-laparotomy" cholecystectomy with a small incision through the rectus abdominis muscle.

RESULTS

The operation lasted significantly longer in group L compared with group M, whereas patients of group L had a shorter hospital stay. There was no difference between groups regarding postoperative day on which patients commenced eating. There was no significant difference between groups regarding doses of analgesics used during surgery or in the recovery room. However, patients in group M used significantly more opioids in the postoperative period. Time to resume normal activity was significantly shorter in group L. A very good aesthetic result was obtained in 97.7% of patients in group L and 77.3% of patients in group M.

CONCLUSIONS

Cholecystectomy through a mini-laparotomy incision is a lower-cost, versatile, and safe alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Systemic inflammatory response after endoscopic (TEP) vs Shouldice groin hernia repair

Endoscopic techniques are commonly used for many different types of surgery. It is claimed that videoendoscopic procedures have the advantage of being less traumatic and of offering higher postoperative patient comfort than conventional open techniques. The extent of tissue trauma can be evaluated on the basis of the inflammatory response observed in the wake of surgery. Available studies that have compared endoscopic and conventional techniques suggest that endoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic colorectal resection, and thoracoscopic pulmonary resection have immunologic advantages over conventional approaches. The objective of this prospective study was to determine whether endoscopic hernia repair techniques are also preferable to conventional procedures and to what extent the anesthetic technique (local or general anesthesia) influences the postoperative inflammatory response. For this purpose, biochemical monitoring of cytokine activity [C-reactive protein (CRP), prostaglandin F1alpha (PGF1alpha), neopterin, interleukin-6 (IL-6)] was done prospectively in 101 patients [totally extraperitoneal approach (TEP) n=32, unilateral n=12, bilateral n=20; Shouldice n=69, local anesthesia (LA) n=23, general anesthesia (GA) n=46] before and until 3 days after surgery. The parameters IL-6 and PGF1alpha suggested that the immune trauma immediately after surgery was significantly higher in the group of patients with endoscopic hernia repair than in the group of patients who received a Shouldice repair. No significant differences were observed after the first postoperative day. A comparison between the TEP group and the patients who received conventional surgery under local anesthesia showed that the TEP approach was also associated with a higher postoperative neopterin level. Within the first 3 days after surgical intervention, bilateral endoscopic hernia repair induced no significantly higher inflammatory response than the surgical treatment of unilateral conditions. The anesthetic procedure that was used in the Shouldice operation had no significant effect on inflammatory response. Unlike other types of endoscopic surgery, the repair of groin hernias using an endoscopic technique cannot be regarded as a minimally invasive procedure that is less traumatic than conventional approaches. Instead, the conventional Shouldice procedure appears to cause the lowest inflammatory response and to be the least traumatic approach to hernia repair, especially when it is performed under local anesthesia.

Cholecystectomy in patients with previous spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

The number of people in the United States with spinal cord injury (SCI) is estimated at about 200,000. The prevalence of gallbladder disease in this population is about three times as high as in neurally intact people, but the results of surgical treatment have received little attention.

METHODS

A retrospective, population-based study of patients with SCI who later received cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease was performed. National computer data sets of all patients receiving medical care in all Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) medical centers for fiscal years 1994 to 1998 were used. Computer-based data were augmented with chart-based resources.

RESULTS

During the period of interest, there were 21,849 patients with ICD-9-CM codes for SCI in the DVA computer system, among whom 367 had codes for cholecystectomy. After retrieval and review of data from individual charts, 118 were deemed evaluable. There were 68 who had successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 14 who required conversion to open cholecystectomy after laparoscopic efforts failed (conversion rate 14 of 82=17%). There were 36 who received planned open cholecystectomy. Patients under the age of 60 years were more likely to have a laparoscopic approach (P <0.05). Emergency cholecystectomies were more likely to be performed via the open route (P <0.01). The morbidity rate was 8 of 68 (12%) for successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 4 of 14 (29%) for failed laparoscopic surgery completed by conventional open technique, and 11 of 36 (31%) for planned open surgery. The mortality rate in the traditional surgery group was 1 of 36 (3%). There were no deaths in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe this series is the largest so far reported. The mortality rate of cholecystectomy in SCI patients is comparable to that in neurally intact individuals, but the morbidity rate is high. Contractures, stomas, heterotopic ossification, and other sequelae of SCI do not generally cause technical difficulties with surgery. If complications of cholecystectomy are indeed SCI-related, attention to perioperative SCI care could improve outcomes of cholecystectomy. Future research should continue to explore this important research topic.

Temperature control and recovery of bowel function after laparoscopic or laparotomic colorectal surgery in patients receiving combined epidural/general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia

We compared the effects of a laparoscopic (n = 23) versus laparotomic (n = 21) technique for major abdominal surgery on temperature control in 44 patients undergoing colorectal surgery during a combined epidural/general anesthesia. A thoracic epidural block up to T4 was induced with 6-10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine; general anesthesia was induced with thiopental, fentanyl, and atracurium IV and maintained with isoflurane. Core temperature was measured with a bladder probe and recorded every 15 min after the induction. In both groups, core temperature decreased to 35.2 degrees C (range, 34 degrees C-36 degrees C) at the end of surgery. After surgery, normothermia returned after 75 min (60-120 min) in the Laparoscopy group and 60 min (45-180 min) in the Laparotomy group (P = 0.56). No differences in postanesthesia care unit discharge time were reported between the two groups. The degree of pain during coughing was smaller after laparoscopy than laparotomy from the 24th to the 72nd observation times (P < 0.01). Morphine consumption was 22 mg (2-65 mg) in the Laparotomy group and 5 mg (0-45 mg) in the Laparoscopy group (P = 0.02). The time to first flatus was shorter after laparoscopy (24 h [16-72 h]) than laparotomy (72 h [26-96 h]) (P = 0.0005), and the first intake of clear liquid occurred after 48 h (24-72 h) in the Laparoscopy group and after 96 h (90-96 h) in the Laparotomy group (P = 0.0005). Although laparoscopic surgery provides positive effects on the degree of postoperative pain and recovery of bowel function, the reduction in heat loss produced by minimizing bowel exposure with laparoscopic surgery does not compensate for the anesthesia-related effects on temperature control, and active patient warming must also be used with laparoscopic techniques.

IMPLICATIONS

This prospective, randomized, controlled study demonstrates that laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in less postoperative pain and earlier recovery of bowel function than conventional laparotomy but does not reduce the risk for perioperative hypothermia. Accordingly, active warming must be provided to patients also during laparoscopic procedures.

The metabolic and immune response to laparoscopic versus open liver resection

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver surgery is a field in its infancy, and scientific evidence of its benefits over those of traditional open techniques has not been shown. Various applications from wedge resections to formal segmental resections have been reported, but the technical ability does not necessarily translate into improved patient outcomes. There is an abundance of evidence reflecting the benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [9, 12, 23], and some of these benefits have been linked to the decreased metabolic and immune responses involved [24, 27]. There is also accumulating evidence that tumor growth may be slower after laparoscopic surgery than after comparable open surgery, and that this is a result of less immune suppression [1]. It is not known whether laparoscopic liver surgery will convey similar benefits.

METHODS

In this study, 14 pigs were assigned randomly to undergo a liver resection either by a laparoscopic or an open approach. Operative stress was assessed via cortisol, tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein. The immune response was evaluated through delayed-type hypersensitivity skin antigen testing. Adhesion formation also was assessed at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Immune response as measured by delayed-type hypersensitivity is better preserved after laparoscopic than after open liver resection. The average diameter of induration was 46% greater in the laparoscopic group (20.71 +/- 2.7 mm versus 14.14 +/- 1.5 mm). Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor levels showed a significantly greater rise after open surgery. No difference was observed in the levels of C-reactive protein or cortisol. Adhesion formation was considerably less after laparoscopic resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic liver resection results in a diminished stress response, as compared with that of open resection, which translates into greater preservation of immune function. This finding may well have a beneficial effect on infection and tumor growth.

Post-operative course after conventional or laparoscopic gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients

The post-operative period is particularly dangerous for obese patients. The aim of this study was to compare the immediate post-operative course after either laparoscopic or open gastroplasty. We studied retrospectively 20 and 14 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or open adjustable silicone gastric banding, respectively. After the laparoscopic procedure, patients had a significantly shorter stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit (0.3 +/- 0.4 and 1.1 +/- 1 days), reduced analgesic requirements, a shorter period of intravenous catheter use (2.3 +/- 1.9 and 4.8 +/- 1.4 days), were able to walk sooner (1 +/- 0.4 and 2.1 +/- 1.6 days) and had a significantly shorter duration of in-hospital stay (5.4 +/- 2.3 and 15.8 +/- 4.5 days) than after an open procedure. This report suggests that the use of laparoscopy for gastroplasty in morbidity obese patients may significantly improve the immediate post-operative course.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and desirability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in day-care versus LC with clinical observation.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been performed regularly as outpatient surgery in patients with uncomplicated gallstone disease in the United States, but this has not been generally accepted in Europe. The main objections are the risk of early severe complications (bleeding) or other reasons for readmission, and the argument that patients might feel safer when observed for one night. Quality-of-life differences hitherto have not been investigated.

METHODS

Eighty patients (American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] I/II) with symptomatic gallstones were randomized to receive LC either in day-care or with clinical observation. Complications, (re)admissions, consultations of general practitioners or the day-care center within 4 days after surgery, use of pain medication, quality of life, convalescence period, time off from professional activities, and treatment preference were assessed. The respective costs of day-care and clinical observation were determined.

RESULTS

Of the 37 patients assigned to the day-care group who underwent elective surgery, 92% were discharged successfully after an observation period of 5.7+/-0.2 hours. The remainder of the patients in this group were admitted to the hospital and clinically observed for 24 hours. For the 37 patients in the clinical observation group who underwent elective surgery, the observation time after surgery was 31+/-3 hours. Three patients in the day-care group and one patient in the clinical observation group had complications after surgery. None of the patients in either group consulted a general practitioner or the hospital during the first week after surgery. Use of pain medication was comparable in both groups over the first 48 hours after surgery. There were no differences in pain and other quality-of-life indicators between the groups during the 6 weeks of follow-up. Of the patients in the day-care group, 92% preferred day-care to clinical observation. The same percentage of patients in the clinical observation group preferred at least 24 hours of observation to day-care. Costs for the day-care patients were substantially lower (approximately $750/patient) than for the clinical observation patients.

CONCLUSION

Effectiveness was equal in both patient groups, and both groups appeared to be satisfied with their treatment. Because no differences were found with respect to the other outcomes, day-care is the preferred treatment in most ASA I and II patients because it is less expensive.

Mini-lap cholecystectomy: a viable alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the Third World?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) requires expensive equipment and special training. Mini-lap cholecystectomy (MLC) has no start-up costs but no large series from a single centre has been reported as the procedure is considered hazardous because of inadequate exposure of the surgical field.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 737 cholecystectomies performed through a 3-5-cm transverse subcostal incision and compared the results to published series of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

The operating time (61.6 min; range 35-130), conversion rate (4%), rate of postoperative complications (3.6%), bile duct injuries (0.3%), number of analgesic doses required (3.4; range 3-8), duration of postoperative hospital stay (1.4; range 1-15 days), and the time off work (13.3 days; range 8-61) compare well with the reported results of laparoscopic and MLC. Ninety-three per cent of the patients were followed up for a median period of 28.4 months and none developed biliary stricture.

CONCLUSIONS

Mini-lap cholecystectomy is considered a safe, viable alternative to LC in the Third World.

Improvement in the management of bile duct injuries?

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that improvements in diagnostic workup and treatment of bile duct injuries (BDI) sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be expected as experience increases with the laparoscopic procedure. Many published articles reported that early diagnosis, proper classification, and optimal timing of treatment of BDI increase the likelihood of successful treatment. This study determined whether diagnosis and management of BDI have improved over the years.

STUDY DESIGN

Between June 1990 and November 1996, 106 patients were diagnosed and treated in the Amsterdam Academic Medical Center for BDI sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Detailed information was obtained about peroperative findings, time interval from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to symptoms, and interval from symptoms to diagnosis. Bile duct injuries were classified into four types. Two patient groups were compared: BDI patients diagnosed from 1990 until 1994 ("learning phase") and patients diagnosed from 1995 until 1996.

RESULTS

Bile duct injuries combined with bile leakage were diagnosed significantly earlier in the second period after the learning phase. The percentages of injuries diagnosed peroperatively, "blind laparotomies," and suboptimal timed hepaticojejunostomies were not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Except for earlier diagnosis of BDI in the later period than in previous years, there appeared to be no significant improvement in diagnostic workup and management during the past 2 years.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report on the community hospital experience in Hokkaido

We analyzed the outcome of 1408 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) between February 1991 and October 1993 in affiliated community hospitals around Hokkaido, Japan. LC was performed for symptomatic gallstones (68%) and asymptomatic gallstones (29%) using the pneumoperitoneum (96%) or abdominal wall lift (4%) techniques. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 105 patients (10%), including bile duct injuries in 9 patients (0.9%). Conversion to open surgery or reoperation was required in 89 patients (8%) mainly because of unclear anatomy, difficulties with hemostasis, or bile duct injury. One patient died of congestive heart failure, resulting in a mortality rate of 0.07%. The patients were discharged after an average of 8 days, and returned to work after an average of 14 days. The complication and conversion rates were high; however, the incidences of reoperation, bile duct injuries, postoperative bile leaks, and deaths were low. In conclusion, LC was performed with acceptable safety in our community hospitals. The reason for this is most likely that conventional cholecystectomy was preferred to LC in difficult cases during this early period.

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in patients with complicated acute cholecystitis or fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The open subtotal cholecystectomy technique has simplified removal of the difficult gallbladder. Increasing laparoscopic experience has made laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) a feasible option in patients with complicated acute or chronic cholecystitis.

METHODS

LSC was performed in 29 patients with severe inflammation or fibrosis of the gallbladder associated with gallstone disease over a 23-month period. These 29 patients (mean age 53 years; 22 women) constituted 8.5 per cent of the total number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed (n = 340) and 15.6 per cent of 186 patients with acute cholecystitis. Eighteen patients in the latter group underwent conversion to open cholecystectomy. The indications for LSC were acute cholecystitis/empyema (n = 23) and severe fibrosis (n = 6).

RESULTS

The cystic duct was either clipped before division (n = 15), sutured (n = 2) or ligated using an Endoloop (n = 10). In two patients the gallbladder bed was drained without isolating the cystic duct. The posterior wall of the gallbladder was left intact to avoid excessive bleeding or damage to bile ducts in the gallbladder bed. A suction drain was inserted in 14 cases. Median operating time was 73 (range 45-130) min. One patient died after operation from a myocardial infarction. Six patients had local complications (two haematomas, three bile leaks, one minor wound sepsis) and nine developed respiratory infections. Median hospital stay was 5 (range 2-28) days.

CONCLUSION

LSC is a safe, relatively simple and definitive procedure allowing removal of a difficult gallbladder and reducing the need for open conversion or cholecystostomy in the majority of patients.

OUR FIRST HUNDRED LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMIES

Hundred patients with symptomatic gallstone disease underwent laparosopic cholecystectomy between June 1996 and August 1997. There were 78 females and 22 males, with a mean age of 46.2 (SD 17.8; range 21 to 85) years. The common presentations were right upper abdominal pain (n=66), acute cholecystitis (n=8) and history of jaundice (n=11). Sixteen patients underwent ERCP for suspected CBD stones. Endoscopic papillotomy and basketing cleared the CBD of all calculi in 12. Three patients required conversion to open cholecystectomy because of dense adhesions (n=2) and to control intraoperative haemorrhage (n=1). Mean operating time was 67.2 (SD 39.2; range 22 to 186) minutes. The mean requirement of analgesics was 2.8 (SD 1.3; range 2 to 5) doses and post-operative hospital stay was 1.6 (SD 1.4; range 1 to 7) days. All patients resumed normal activity within 14 days of operation and are well and satisfied with their operation at a median follow up of 8.6 months.

Suspected biliary complications after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy leading to endoscopic cholangiography: a retrospective comparison

To study how suspected postoperative biliary complications are influenced by surgical technique, we compared clinical profiles of 63 patients referred for ERCP after open (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) over a four-year period. ERCP was not performed for postoperative pain alone and only six (9.5%) studies were normal. Referrals after LC were younger (mean 39.1 vs 53.6 years, P < 0.001) and ERCP was requested earlier (mean 71.6 vs 2360 days, P < 0.001) in the postoperative course. Choledocholithiasis (CDL) alone, the most common finding, was successfully managed with a single ERCP in 97.2% of cases. CDL after LC occurred in younger patients (35.5 vs 58.9 years, P < 0.01) who presented earlier (mean 98.6 days vs 5.1 years, P < 0.01), without biliary ductal dilatation (P < 0.01). Although CDL after LC was associated with higher ALT and bilirubin levels than after OC, the difference was not statistically significant. Cystic duct leaks (LC: six patients, OC: four patients) were typically associated with CDL after OC and 90% resolved with endoscopic therapy. Biliary ligation (four cases) was managed successfully with choledochojejunostomy. We conclude that findings at ERCP for suspected biliary obstruction or injury after OC or LC are similar and usually can be endoscopically managed. After LC, referrals currently are younger, present much earlier, and retained stones are less likely to be associated with ductal dilatation than after OC.

Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response

OBJECTIVE

The authors review studies relating to the immune responses evoked by laparoscopic surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Laparoscopic surgery has gained rapid acceptance based on clinical grounds. Patients benefit from faster recovery, decreased pain, and quicker return to normal activities. Only more recently have attempts been made to identify the metabolic and immune responses that may underlie this clinical success. The immune responses to laparoscopy are now being evaluated in relation to the present knowledge of immune responses to traditional laparotomy and surgery in general.

METHODS

A review of the published literature of the immune and metabolic responses to laparoscopy was performed. Laparoscopic surgery is compared with the traditional laparotomy on the basis of local and systemic immune responses and patterns of tumor growth. The impact of pneumoperitoneum and insufflation gases on the immune response is also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The systemic immune responses for surgery in general may not apply to laparoscopic surgery. The body's response to laparoscopy is one of lesser immune activation as opposed to immunosuppression.