Treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia and an inhibitor: comparison of two treatment protocols with recombinant activated factor VII

Continuous infusion of recombinant activated factor VII: a review of data in congenital hemophilia with inhibitors and congenital factor VII deficiency

Introduction

Continuous infusion (CI) of clotting factors as a replacement therapy for perioperative hemostatic protection has been performed for many years, including with factors VIII and IX and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). This approach provides steady factor levels without requiring frequent administration of bolus doses.

Aim

To review safety, efficacy, and dosing data regarding CI of rFVIIa for hemostatic management of patients with congenital hemophilia with inhibitors (CHwI) or congenital factor VII deficiency (C7D).

Materials and methods

A literature review identified instances of CI of rFVIIa in patients with CHwI or C7D undergoing surgery or experiencing bleeding episodes. Data regarding safety, efficacy, and dosing were extracted.

Results

The safety and efficacy of 50 mcg/kg/h CI of rFVIIa following a 90 mcg/kg bolus injection, vs a standard bolus injection regimen, was reported for 24 patients with CHwI undergoing elective surgery in an open-label, randomized, Phase III trial. Efficacy was similar between CI and bolus injection groups at all postoperative time points assessed. Additionally, a postmarketing surveillance study reported effective (80%) and partially effective (20%) CI of rFVIIa in a Japanese cohort of ten patients with CHwI who underwent 15 surgical procedures. Finally, the safety and dosing of rFVIIa CI in 193 and 26 patients with CHwI and C7D, respectively, were reported in 11 prospective studies, 10 retrospective studies, and 30 case reports. No unexpected safety findings were reported.

Conclusion

rFVIIa CI has been performed safely and effectively in patients with CHwI and C7D undergoing surgery and during bleeding episodes in patients with CHwI.

Revisiting hemophilia management in acute medicine

The World Federation of Hemophilia estimates that more than 350,000 people globally have a form of the disease. Hemophilia A is a bleeding disorder that has a spectrum of manifestations ranging from persistent bleeding after minor trauma to spontaneous hemorrhage. We report a case of a male patient with hemophilia A who received general anesthesia for removal of foreign body from the nose. There was no excessive blood loss during surgery. Perioperatively, the patient received recombinant factor VIII coverage. Rest of the postoperative course was uneventful. Literature on the clinical management of patient with hemophilia A are reviewed and considerations for perioperative preparation and management of hemophilic patient are presented.

Recombinant activated clotting factor VII (rFVIIa) in the treatment of surgical and spontaneous bleeding episodes in hemophilic patients

Inhibitors against replacement clotting factors occur in approximately 30%–40% of patients with hemophilia A and 1.5%–3% of patients with hemophilia B. In this group of patients, bleeding events are best treated with bypassing agents. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has become the first-line agent in treating surgical and non-surgical bleeding in many centres with efficacy at standard 90 μg/kg doses approaching 90%. The greater efficacy is associated with early initiation of treatment, as well as, possibly larger doses of rFVIIa. A higher concentration appears to be essential in initiating an adequate thrombin burst, which results in a stable clot. Higher dosage regimens, home therapy and continuous infusion regimens are continuously evolving as we strive to define optimal dosing strategies in hemophilia patients. rFVIIa has been a remarkably safe agent for hemophiliacs but with high dosages being advocated and older patients being given such doses outside a trial setting, thromboembolic events remain a concern.

The diagnosis and management of factor VIII and IX inhibitors: a guideline from the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation

The revised UKHCDO factor (F) VIII/IX Inhibitor Guidelines (2000) are presented. A schema is proposed for inhibitor surveillance, which varies according to the severity of the haemophilia and the treatment type and regimen used. The methodological and pharmacokinetic approach to inhibitor surveillance in congenital haemophilia has been updated. Factor VIII/IX genotyping of patients is recommended to identify those at increased risk. All patients who develop an inhibitor should be considered for immune tolerance induction (ITI). The decision to attempt ITI for FIX inhibitors must be carefully weighed against the relatively high risk of reactions and the nephrotic syndrome and the relatively low response rate observed in this group. The start of ITI should be deferred until the inhibitor has declined below 10 Bethesda Units/ml, where possible. ITI should continue, even in resistant patients, where it is well tolerated and so long as there is a convincing downward trend in the inhibitor titre. The choice of treatment for bleeding in inhibitor patients is dictated by the severity of the bleed, the current inhibitor titre, the previous anamnestic response to FVIII/IX, the previous clinical response and the side-effect profile of the agents available. We have reviewed novel dose-regimens and modes of administration of FEIBA (factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity) and recombinant activated FVII (rVIIa) and the extent to which these agents may be used for prophylaxis and surgery. Bleeding in acquired haemophilia is usually treated with FEIBA or rVIIa. Immunosuppressive therapy should be initiated at the time of diagnosis with Prednisolone 1 mg/kg/d +/- cyclophosphamide. In the absence of a response to these agents within 6 weeks, second-line therapy with Rituximab, Ciclosporin A, or other multiple-modality regimens may be considered.

Advances in gene therapy using factor VIIa in hemophilia

The development of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) has provided an effective, alternative treatment strategy for hemophilia patients with inhibitors. However, its short half-life necessitates frequent infusions and results in high treatment costs. One potential solution to this problem may lie in the use of FVIIa gene transfer, which would achieve long-lasting therapeutic levels of expression from a single injection. Studies in animal models have shown that a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector can be used to insert both murine and human FVIIa into murine liver. Following FVIIa gene transfer, mice with hemophilia B demonstrated a long-term, dose-dependent increase in circulating levels of FVIIa, reduced prothrombin time, and correction of activated partial thromboplastin time into the normal range. In addition, blood loss following a modified tail-clip assay was significantly reduced. Ongoing studies in mice engineered to express a wide range of FVIIa levels aim to analyze organ histology and evaluate long-term survival, reproductive fitness, and real-time in vivo clot formation in the microvasculature. These studies are expanding our knowledge of the effects of continuously expressed rFVIIa, and it is hoped that they may eventually provide a new avenue for treatment of hemophilia.

Recombinant activated factor VII therapy in acquired hemophilia of the elderly

Acquired hemophilia is a life-threatening condition associated with a high mortality, occurring mainly in elderly patients. We report on a 92-year-old male, administered two courses of 90 microg kg(-1) of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) due to failure of human factor VIII (FVIII) therapy, without side effects nor evidence of thrombotic complications. Despite the bleeding being completely under control, the patient died on day 11 of acute respiratory failure due to pneumonia. This case confirms previous reports on the complexity and severity of this disorder, showing that rFVIIa is an effective and safe agent for achieving hemostasis even in elderly patients with a FVIII inhibitor.

Recombinant factor VIIa: review of efficacy, dosing regimens and safety in patients with congenital and acquired factor VIII or IX inhibitors

Recombinant factor (rF)VIIa has been available to clinicians since 1996 and has an excellent safety record after almost three-quarters of a million doses have been administered. This paper will review the current clinical experience with rFVIIa dosing in acquired and congenital hemophilia with inhibitors and chronicle all spontaneous and clinical trial reports of thrombotic adverse events as of April 2003. Standard dosing of rFVIIa (90 micro g kg(-1)) allows binding of FVIIa to the surface of an activated platelet and can directly activate factor X in the absence of tissue factor. Experience with bolus dosing suggests that higher dosing (>200 micro g kg(-1)) may be more efficacious in treating hemophilia patients. Clinical trials are ongoing to validate this observation. Continuous infusion dosing may be efficacious for major surgery but high infusion rates (50 micro g kg(-1) h(-1)) might be needed. The relationship between dose of rFVIIa, amount of thrombin generated and measurable FVIIa level is still not known and perhaps newer testing which measures thrombin generation might be more advantageous. Relatively few thrombotic events have been associated with rFVIIa. Known factors predisposing to thrombosis were present in 20 of the 25 (80%) hemophilia patients who were reported spontaneously or who developed a thrombosis during a clinical trial. Additionally, thrombotic events have not increased despite a growing experience with higher dosing of rFVIIa.

Control of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors: a systematic review

This paper reports a systematic review of the best available evidence of clinical effectiveness in the treatment of acute bleeding in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Because of the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic, broad inclusion criteria with regard to study design were applied in order to assess the best available evidence for each intervention. Because of the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the evidence, it was not appropriate to pool data across studies; instead, data were synthesized using tabulation and qualitative narrative assessment. No evidence was found to support the use of high-dose factor VIII (FVIII) in bleeding episodes. However in surgery it was found to be highly successful (100%) for low-titre, low-responding inhibitors although not reliable for high-responding inhibitors. Porcine FVIII (pFVIII) was effective in the control of severe bleeding episodes with high-titre or high-responding inhibitors (100%) and in 60-90% of surgical procedures. Activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCCs) appear to be more effective than prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) in the control of mild to severe bleeding episodes. There was no good evidence for the use of PCCs in surgery. APCCs controlled bleeding in approximately 90% of surgical episodes. Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) controlled 70-100% of mild to severe bleeding episodes with high-responding inhibitors, and achieved better results when used early. It was effective in 60-100% of surgical episodes. Doses varied from study to study, and side-effects from mild to infrequent but serious adverse events were reported. The quality of the evidence is variable. Limited evidence relating to other treatment options is also included in the review.

A new approach to treatment of bleeding episodes in young hemophilia patients: a single bolus megadose of recombinant activated factor VII (NovoSeven)

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa, NovoSeven) represents an effective treatment for hemophilia patients with inhibitors, but no consensus as to the best dosing regimen exists. We assessed the efficacy and safety of a rFVIIa 'megadose' (300 micro g kg(-1) bolus) as treatment for bleeds in three young inhibitor patients. Of 114 bleeds, 95 responded to a single dose. Pain relief was faster and therapy duration significantly shorter than with continuous infusion (CI) regimens or standard boluses (90 micro g kg(-1) every 3 h). Rebleeding occurred in 9.6% of cases and 19/114 episodes required a second bolus injection. Although rFVIIa consumption per bleed (median: 300 micro g kg(-1)) was higher than with standard boluses (180-270 micro g kg(-1)), patients found single bolus administration more convenient than recurrent injections or CI. With two exceptions, no complications occurred within 3 h of treatment, despite high FVII:C levels (median: 27.4 U mL(-1); range: 19.8-54 U mL(-1)). Treatment of bleeds with a rFVIIa megadose in young inhibitor patients is effective and well tolerated.

Congenital bleeding disorders

Both clinical and basic problems related to the congenital bleeding disorders continue to confront hematologists. On the forefront are efforts to bring genetic correction of the more common bleeding disorders such as hemophilia A to the clinic in a safe and accessible manner. A second issue, particularly for patients with hemophilia, is the development of inhibitors-questions of how they arise and how to prevent and treat these problems that confound otherwise very successful replacement therapy and allow patients to maintain normal lifestyles. A third issue is the continuing question of diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease, the most common congenital bleeding disorder, especially in individuals who have borderline laboratory values, but have a history of clinical bleeding. In Section I, Dr. Christopher Walsh discusses general principles of effective gene transfer for the hemophilias, specific information about viral vectors and non-viral gene transfer, and alternative target tissues for factor VIII and factor IX production. He highlights information about the immune response to gene transfer and reviews data from the hemophilia gene transfer trials to date. The future prospects for newer methods of therapy such as RNA repair and the use of gene-modified circulating endothelial progenitors are presented as possible alternatives to the more traditional gene therapy approaches. In Section II, Dr. Nigel Key focuses on inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia A. He reviews the progress in our understanding of the risk factors and presents newer information about the immunobiology of inhibitor development. He discusses the natural history of these inhibitors and the screening, laboratory diagnosis, and treatment, including the use of different modalities for the treatment of acute bleeding episodes. Dr. Key also presents information about the eradication of inhibitors by immune tolerance induction and reviews recent information from the international registries regarding the status and success of immune tolerance induction. In Section III, Dr. Margaret Rick discusses the diagnosis, classification, and management of von Willebrand disease. Attention is given to the difficulty of diagnosis in patients with mild bleeding histories and borderline laboratory test results for von Willebrand factor. She presents the value of different laboratory assays for both diagnosis and classification, and she relates the classification of von Willebrand disease to the choice of treatment and to the known genetic mutations. Practical issues of diagnosis and treatment, including clinical cases, will be presented.

Sequential treatment with bolus and continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIIa for hip arthroplasty in a patient with haemophilia A and inhibitor

We describe a total arthroplasty of the hip in a 40-year-old male patient with haemophilia A and a high-titre inhibitor to factor VIII, treated with rFVIIa. The patient received sequential therapy first as bolus in the early postoperative phase in order to obtain appropriate haemostasis and then as continuous infusion with lower doses to avoid frequent episodes of bleeding without a higher consumption of product. After an initial dose of 150 micro g kg-1 for the first five days after surgery, we used bolus doses of 120-90 micro g kg-1 every 2.5-3 h, achieving plasma FVII:C levels above 40 U mL-1. We then continued with continuous infusion at decreasing doses 15-7 micro g kg-1 h-1 for 12 days (FVII:C 19-7 U mL-1). There were no bleeding complications nor signs of clotting activity. The rehabilitation programme was continued without prophylactic treatment. The total consumption of rFVIIa was 6.3 mg kg-1, implying a saving of at least 30% of the product with respect to previous publications.

Efficacy of recombinant factor VIIa administered by continuous infusion to haemophilia patients with inhibitors

We have prospectively monitored treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors by recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) administered by continuous infusion to obtain more insight in the underlying factors of the clinical efficacy of this administration method. At present, 43 treatment episodes of 14 different Dutch haemophilia inhibitor patients are included in the database. Analysis of the data showed a discrepancy between the efficacy of rFVIIa continuous infusion treatment of acute and surgical bleeds in the oral cavity [one (14%) effective, two (29%) partially effective, four (57%) not effective] and other parts of the body [29 (80%) effective, four (11%) partially effective, two (6%) not effective, one (3%) impossible to classify]. Patients who had acute or surgical oral cavity bleeds, uncontrolled by rFVIIa continuous infusion, reacted favourably to rFVIIa continuous infusion in other locations of the body. Acute bleeding episodes in the oral cavity, which could not be controlled by rFVIIa continuous infusion, stopped when the treatment regimen was switched to rFVIIa bolus injections. Finally, haemostatic control during dental extractions was excellent after the initial rFVIIa bolus injection preceding the continuous infusion, but rebleeds occurred in all patients within 48 h under rFVIIa continuous infusion coverage. These observations suggest that the efficacy of rFVIIa continuous infusion depends, at least in part, on the location of the body in which the bleeding occurs and that rFVIIa bolus injections are more effective than rFVIIa continuous infusion in the oral cavity. We hypothesize that the inability of rFVIIa continuous infusion treatment to sufficiently inhibit fibrinolysis is the underlying cause of the decreased efficacy of rFVIIa continuous infusion treatment in the oral cavity.

Continuous infusion of coagulation factor products

OBJECTIVE

To review clinical information related to the use of continuous infusion factor products in patients with hemophilia. Specifically, case reports and open-label trials are summarized involving the use of factor VIII and recombinant factor VIIa for a variety of indications including surgical prophylaxis, acute bleeding, primary prevention, and management of inhibitors. In addition, issues surrounding the use of continuous infusion of factor products such as pharmacokinetic rationale, stability/sterility, and cost are reviewed.

DATA SOURCES

Primary and review articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1990-June 2001) and through secondary sources.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data concerning the administration of factor products are primarily detailed in open-label trials and case reports. Comparisons between intermittent bolus injections and continuous infusion of factor products are limited and primarily compare continuous infusion regimens with historical controls. The rationale behind the continuous-infusion approach is linked to the pharmacokinetics of factor products administered via this route. Pharmacokinetic data reveal that, with continuous infusion of factor products, a reduction in clearance and a maintenance of factor serum concentrations are noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of factor products (factor VIII and recombinant factor VIIa) via continuous infusion has produced favorable hemostatic effects compared with intermittent bolus injections. The advantages of continuous infusion include maintenance of a constant factor concentration, thereby reducing risk of bleeding from excessively low trough concentrations, and a decrease in factor consumption related to a reduction in factor clearance with constant infusion. Manufacturers recommend using reconstituted factor products either immediately or within 1-3 hours after reconstitution; however, several studies have found the products to be stable and sterile for longer periods.

Inhibitor treatment: state of the art

The treatment of hemophilic patients with inhibitors presents many challenges. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark) is a new therapeutic option for this patient population. Optimization of dosing regimens may be achieved by considering (1) individual pharmacokinetics (especially in the pediatric population); (2) high-dose bolus regimens; (3) continuous infusion (CI) including high-dose CI; (4) early treatment with NovoSeven in the course of a bleeding event; and (5) use of NovoSeven as a prophylactic therapy. The literature involving these issues is reviewed here. Institution of early therapy has been shown to decrease total NovoSeven requirement while increasing efficacy. Pediatric patients may require a higher dose of NovoSeven due to the higher clearance rate and shorter half-life demonstrated by this population. Therefore, the patient's age and/or individual pharmacokinetics and clearance rate should be considered when calculating doses and CI rates. High-dose NovoSeven has been shown to be effective in some patient populations without increased reported adverse events. Despite its short half-life, prophylactic use of NovoSeven has been reported in a small number of patients, with an apparent decrease in bleeding episodes experienced. There has been significant interest in administration of NovoSeven by CI, particularly in patients requiring prolonged treatment, and it has been shown to be successful, although the optimal target factor VII activity has yet to be established and some authors have recommended the use of concomitant antifibrinolytics.