Efficiency and rationality in the planning of health care for people with AIDS: an application of the balance of care approach. North-East Italian Group for Planning of AIDS Health Care

Improving the mix of institutional and community care for older people with dementia: an application of the balance of care approach in eight European countries

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether the mix of community and institutional long-term care (ILTC) for people with dementia (PwD) in Europe could be improved; assess the economic consequences of providing alternative services for particular groups of ILTC entrants and explore the transnational application of the 'Balance of Care' (BoC) approach.

METHOD

A BoC study was undertaken in Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the UK as part of the RightTimePlaceCare project. Drawing on information about 2014 PwD on the margins of ILTC admission, this strategic planning framework identified people whose needs could be met in more than one setting, and compared the relative costs of the possible alternatives.

RESULTS

The findings suggest a noteworthy minority of ILTC entrants could be more appropriately supported in the community if enhanced services were available. This would not necessarily require innovative services, but more standard care (including personal and day care), assuming quality was ensured. Potential cost savings were identified in all countries, but community care was not always cheaper than ILTC and the ability to release resources varied between nations.

CONCLUSIONS

This is believed to be the first transnational application of the BoC approach, and demonstrates its potential to provide a consistent approach to planning across different health and social care systems. Better comparative information is needed on the number of ILTC entrants with dementia, unit costs and outcomes. Nevertheless, the findings offer important evidence on the appropriateness of current provision, and the opportunity to learn from different countries' experience.

The balance of care approach to health and social care planning: lessons from a systematic literature review

The strategic allocation of resources is one the most difficult tasks facing health and social care decision makers, with multiple organisations delivering complex services to heterogeneous populations. The enduring appeal of the balance of care approach, a systematic framework for exploring the potential costs and consequences of changing the mix of community and institutional services in a defined geographical area, is thus unsurprising. However, no attempt has previously been made to synthesise or appraise the methodological approaches employed and lessons to inform future applications may go unheard. This paper seeks to address those concerns by reporting the findings of a systematic literature review that identified 33 examples of the model's use spanning 40 years. The majority of studies were undertaken in the UK and explored the services needed by frail older people. There is, however, nothing in the model to restrict it to this context. The paper also details the different ways key elements of the model (information about clients, resources, the appraisal of settings, costs and outcomes) have been operationalised, and considers their strengths and weaknesses. Whilst several studies identified a potential to reduce costs via the use of less institutional care, not all applications predicted cost savings.

The quality and implications of Balance of Care studies: Lessons from a systematic literature review

The Balance of Care approach provides a framework for assessing the relative costs and outcomes of changes in the mix of services provided for a particular client group in a defined geographical area. A 2008/2009 systematic literature review explored how five key aspects of the framework had been operationalised detailing past studies’ methods. However, little has been reported about the quality of these applications, whilst the (positive and negative, internal and external) issues associated with organisations’ capacity to implement study findings (i.e. reconfigure provision) have not been appraised. Against this background, this paper reports the results of a new review that sought to address these gaps and identified 38 examples of the approach’s use since 1970. Reporting standards appeared to have improved over time, but there was no clear relationship between study quality and year of publication. Recent applications generally had large samples, used credible case types and engaged appropriate personnel in specifying optimal care. However, they rarely considered comprehensive costs, cost shifting or outcomes. Factors perceived to assist service reconfiguration included the high quality data the approach provided and the momentum for change it generated. Negative factors were predominantly financial, including increased average unit costs and the need for bridging funds.

Most appropriate placement for people with dementia: individual experts' vs. expert groups' decisions in eight European countries

AIMS

To investigate the extent of variability in individuals' and multidisciplinary groups' decisions about the most appropriate setting in which to support people with dementia in different European countries.

BACKGROUND

Professionals' views of appropriate care depend on care systems, cultural background and professional discipline. It is not known to what extent decisions made by individual experts and multidisciplinary groups coincide.

DESIGN

A modified nominal group approach was employed in eight countries (Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the UK) as part of the RightTimePlaceCare Project.

METHODS

Detailed vignettes about 14 typical case types of people with dementia were presented to experts in dementia care (n = 161) during November and December 2012. First, experts recorded their personal judgements about the most appropriate settings (home care, assisted living, care home, nursing home) in which to support each of the depicted individuals. Second, participants worked in small groups to reach joint decisions for the same vignettes.

RESULTS

Considerable variation was seen in individuals' recommendations for more than half the case types. Cognitive impairment, functional dependency, living situation and caregiver burden did not differentiate between case types generating high and low degrees of consensus. Group-based decisions were more consistent, but country-specific patterns remained.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach would standardize the decisions made about the care needed by people with dementia on the cusp of care home admission. The results suggest that certain individuals could be appropriately diverted from care home entry if suitable community services were available.

National trends and local delivery in old age mental health services: towards an evidence base. A mixed-methodology study of the balance of care approach, community mental health teams and specialist mental health outreach to care homes

Background

The rising number of older people with mental health problems makes the effective use of mental health resources imperative. Little is known about the clinical effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness of different service models.

Aims

The programme aimed to (1) refine and apply an existing planning tool [‘balance of care’ (BoC)] to this client group; (2) identify whether, how and at what cost the mix of institutional and community services could be improved; (3) enable decision-makers to apply the BoC framework independently; (4) identify variation in the structure, organisation and processes of community mental health teams for older people (CMHTsOP); (5) examine whether or not different community mental health teams (CMHTs) models are associated with different costs/outcomes; (6) identify variation in mental health outreach services for older care home residents; (7) scope the evidence on the association between different outreach models and resident outcomes; and (8) disseminate the research findings to multiple stakeholder groups.

Methods

The programme employed a mixed-methods approach including three systematic literature reviews; a BoC study, which used a systematic framework for choosing between alternative patterns of support by identifying people whose needs could be met in more than one setting and comparing their costs/outcomes; a national survey of CMHTs’ organisation, structure and processes; a multiple case study of CMHTs exhibiting different levels of integration encompassing staff interviews, an observational study of user outcomes and a staff survey; national surveys of CMHTs’ outreach activities and care homes. A planned randomised trial of depression management in care homes was removed at the review stage by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) prior to funding award.

Results

BoC: Past studies exhibited several methodological limitations, and just two related to older people with mental health problems. The current study suggested that if enhanced community services were available, a substantial proportion of care home and inpatient admissions could be diverted, although only the latter would release significant monies. CMHTsOP: 60% of teams were considered multidisciplinary. Most were colocated, had a single point of access (SPA) and standardised assessment documentation. Evidence of the impact of particular CMHT features was limited. Although staff spoke positively about integration, no evidence was found that more integrated teams produced better user outcomes. Working in high-integration teams was associated with poor job outcomes, but other factors negated the statistical significance of this. Care home outreach: Typical services in the literature undertook some combination of screening (less common), assessment, medication review, behaviour management and training, and evidence suggested intervention can benefit depressed residents. Care home staff were perceived to lack necessary skills, but relatively few CMHTs provided formal training.

Limitations

Limitations include a necessary reliance on observational rather than experimental methods, which were not feasible given the nature of the services explored.

Conclusions

BoC: Shifting care towards the community would require the growth of support services; clarification of extra care housing’s (ECH) role; timely responses to people at risk of psychiatric admission; and improved hospital discharge planning. However, the promotion of care at home will not necessarily reduce public expenditure. CMHTsOP: Although practitioners favoured integration, its goals need clarification. Occupational therapists (OTs) and social workers faced difficulties identifying optimal roles, and support workers’ career structures needed delineating. Care home outreach: Further CMHT input to build care home staff skills and screen for depression may be beneficial. Priority areas for further study include the costs and benefits for older people of age inclusive mental health services and the relative cost-effectiveness of different models of mental health outreach for older care home residents.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.

[The Balance of Care approach for the development of custom-fit health care services for people with dementia on the margins of care between home and nursing home: experiences with its application in Germany]

INTRODUCTION

In Germany as in other countries of the European Union (EU), the majority of people with dementia are cared for by their informal caregivers at home. Across countries, however, there are considerable differences in the time to nursing home admission. The European research project RightTimePlaceCare intends to establish good practice recommendations for how to sustain the preferred living situation as long as possible. The Balance of Care approach was used to develop these recommendations, which combines empirical data, cost estimates and expert consensus, and thus implemented in a multinational context for the first time.

METHOD

In eight EU countries a survey was conducted among 2,014 people with dementia and their informal caregivers in nursing homes (n=1,223) or at home (n=791). Selected descriptive characteristics of the study participants were used for case type development. The case types were translated into 14 case vignettes, which were discussed by five to six expert panels (each consisting of three to four participants) per country. The experts (n=161) recommended the most suitable living place (at home or in a nursing home) and customised care packages for home care situations.

RESULTS AND STATE OF AFFAIRS

Across all countries, the experts predominantly recommended care at home for four of the case types whose reference group of study participants actually lived in a nursing home. These case types represent a relevant part of the study population. In Germany, the experts judged the case vignettes as realistic but criticised that information relevant for proper decision making was missing. Expert group discussions always ended in consensus, and care at home was predominately recommended. The proposed care packages most often comprised standard care services, and hence appeared to be realistic and feasible. The development of country-specific recommendations is still ongoing. In order to assess economic feasibility, estimated costs of home care packages will be compared with costs of nursing home care. Further outcomes like the quality of life will be considered for good practice recommendation finding.

CONCLUSION

Balance of Care supports the development of empirically based expert recommendations. The approach is widely applicable but seems to be particularly useful for the development of local custom-fit healthcare services. The clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost implications of the Balance of Care approach remain to be investigated in future studies.

A multicentre study of patient survival, disability, quality of life and cost of care: among patients with AIDS in northern Italy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiological, clinical and economic changes that occurred in the HIV epidemic in Italy prior to and after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

DESIGN

A prospective, observational, multicentre case-control study was conducted comparing data, collected over 6 months, from an AIDS cohort in 1998 with that of a cohort in 1994. Out of 77 patients with AIDS in the 1998 cohort, 74 survived. These 74 patients were matched for severity of illness with 74 patient survivors from the 1994 cohort to enable valid comparisons of mortality, disability-dependency (DD), health-related QOL (HR-QOL), and direct costs.

RESULTS

Overall, a considerable difference was observed in mortality (33.8% in 1994 vs 3.9% in 1998) between unmatched patients of the two cohorts. As for matched patients, the number of hospital admissions was 1.7 in 1994 and 0.8 in 1998; the average length of stay was 28.1 days in 1994 and 12.6 days in 1998. The direct cost per patient per year was euro15 390 and euro11 465 for the 1994 and 1998 cohorts, respectively (1999 values). The 1998 patient cohort had significantly better HR-QOL at 6 months in two domains of the instrument used (emotional reaction and energy) and the percentage of totally dependent patients was significantly lower compared with the 1994 cohort (1.4% vs 6.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to present a comprehensive comparison of direct costs, DD and HR-QOL of patients with AIDS between two time periods. The use of a case-control design has enabled changes in costs and outcomes to be linked to the introduction of HAART in Italy in 1997.

Hospital care for persons with AIDS in European-Union countries; a cross-country comparison

This paper compares AIDS hospital care in several European-Union countries. For this purpose hospital-care utilisation studies on inpatient days and outpatient contacts were analysed in a generic approach controlling for severity stages of AIDS. Lifetime hospital-care needs for AIDS are derived, providing useful information for health-care policy makers. In a next step, lifetime estimates are linked to estimated annual new cases of AIDS, resulting from standardised epidemiological modelling. These results on AIDS impact at the population level are reported including statistical confidence limits. Both lifetime hospital-care needs at the patient level and AIDS impact at the population level are compared between countries and related to characteristics of the national AIDS epidemics and health-care systems. A person with AIDS has a contact--either inpatient day or outpatient visit--with the hospital in 14% (UK) to 24% (France) of the days spent in the AIDS stage. Related to the national AIDS epidemics (epidemiological impact), Italy and Greece have high levels of outpatient contacts per million population. Estimated hospital-bed needs for AIDS in 1995 are up to 2.13% (in Spain) of total national acute-care hospital beds available. Estimated per-capita needs for outpatient visits in 1995 are highest in Italy, corresponding to 108 doctor full-time equivalents. In a case-study for Greece and The Netherlands, differences in hospital-care utilisation patterns were assessed to correspond with differences in their health-care systems (number of hospital beds, doctors and nurses per capita and some qualitative characteristics of medical care in both countries). International comparison of AIDS hospital care is possible using standardised analysis of national hospital-care utilisation data and standardised epidemiological modelling. Estimates of lifetime hospital-care needs are an essential input for cost-effectiveness analyses used to aid health-care policy decision-making.

Hospital care for persons with AIDS in the European Union

This study estimates the current and future hospital resources for AIDS patients in the European Union (EU), using multinational scenario analysis (EU Concerted Action BMH1-CT-941723). In collaboration with another EU-project ('Managing the Costs of HIV Infection'), six national European studies on the utilization of hospital care for AIDS have been selected to provide the data for our analysis. The selection criteria involve recentness, quality, comparability, accessibility and representativeness. Baseline hospital resource utilization is estimated for hospital inpatient days and outpatient contracts, using a standardized approach controlling for two severity stages of AIDS (chronic stage and late stage). The epidemiological part of the study is based on standard models for backcalculating HIV incidence and projecting AIDS incidence, prevalence and mortality. In the next step, baseline resource utilization is linked to epidemiological information in a mixed prevalence and mortality-based approach. Several scenarios render different future epidemiological developments and hospital resource needs. For the year 1999, hospital bed needs of 10,000-12,700 in the EU are indicated, representing an increase of 20-60% compared to the estimated current (1995) level. The projected range for 1999 corresponds to a maximum of 0.65% of all hospital beds available in the EU. The growth in the number of outpatient hospital contacts is projected to possibly exceed that of inpatient days up to 1.82 million in 1999. Our methodology illustrates that estimation of current and future hospital care for AIDS has to be controlled for severity stages, to prevent biases. Further application of the multinational approach is demonstrated through a 'what-if' analysis of the potential impact of combination triple therapy for HIV/AIDS. Estimation of the economic impact of other diseases could as well benefit from the severity-stages approach.