Immunoadsorption with protein A in humoral rejection of kidney transplants

Challenges with sensitized recipients in pediatric heart transplantation

The sensitization of patients to human leukocyte antigens prior to heart transplantation is increasingly being recognized as an important challenge both before and after the transplant, and the effects of sensitization on clinical outcomes are just beginning to be understood. Many patients are listed with the requirement of a negative prospective or virtual crossmatch prior to accepting a donor organ. This strategy has been associated with both longer waitlist times and higher waitlist mortality. An alternative approach is to transplant across a potentially positive crossmatch while utilizing strategies to decrease the significance of the human leukocyte antigen antibodies. This review will examine the challenges and the impact of sensitization on pediatric patients prior to and following heart transplantation.

Prevention and treatment of alloantibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which is commonly caused by preformed and/or de novo HLA alloantibodies, has evolved as a leading cause of early and late kidney allograft injury. In recent years, effective treatment strategies have been established to counteract the deleterious effects of humoral alloreactivity. One major therapeutic challenge is the barrier of a positive pretransplant lymphocytotoxic crossmatch. Several apheresis- and/or IVIG-based protocols have been shown to enable successful crossmatch conversion, including a strategy of peritransplant immunoadsorption for rapid crossmatch conversion immediately before deceased donor transplantation. While such protocols may increase transplant rates and allow for acceptable graft survival, at least in the short-term, it has become evident that, despite intense treatment, many patients still experience clinical or subclinical AMR. This reinforces the need for innovative strategies, such as complementary allocation programs to improve transplant outcomes. For acute AMR, various studies have suggested efficiency of plasmapheresis- or immunoadsorption-based protocols. There is, however, no established treatment for chronic AMR and the development of strategies to reverse or at least halt chronic active rejection remains a big challenge. Major improvements can be expected from studies evaluating innovative therapeutic concepts, such as proteasome inhibition or complement blocking agents.

The spectrum of antibody-mediated renal allograft injury: implications for treatment

Improvements in anti-HLA antibody detection and diagnostic criteria have increased recognition of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) following renal transplantation. Therapy of acute AMR is directed toward rapidly lowering circulating donor-specific antibody (DSA) activity. Despite reversal of acute renal dysfunction, however, antibody-secreting plasma cells in spleen and bone marrow are not depleted by treatment and circulating DSA commonly remains detectable in peripheral blood. Sequential ultrastructural studies of renal allografts during acute AMR show progression of microvascular endothelial abnormalities from necrosis and apoptosis to glomerular and peritubular capillary basement membrane duplication, termed transplant glomerulopathy (TG), a manifestation of chronic AMR. Additionally, long-term exposure to anti-HLA antibodies (particularly against class II antigens) is associated with shortened allograft survival and TG even in the absence of documented acute AMR. The association of TG with prior acute AMR and with circulating DSA provides evidence that antibody-mediated allograft injury exists as a spectrum of renal injury. Although effective therapy is available for acute AMR, allografts remain at risk for chronic AMR and shortened survival. The optimum approach to treatment for chronic AMR remains to be determined.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection

The introduction of both complement 4d (C4d) staining in renal allograft biopsies and sensitive methods to detect anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies, such as single antigen bead flow assays, into tissue-typing techniques have shown the importance of antibody-mediated alloimmune response in kidney transplantation. The use of these sensitive methods, combined with the increased number of transplants in highly sensitized patients with donor-specific antibodies, or patients receiving desensitization protocols, have increased the awareness and thus the incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection. Chronic rejection also can be mediated through alloantibodies, and the term chronic antibody-mediated rejection recently was proposed. In this review article we summarize the current knowledge of the role of alloantibodies in transplantation, the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and their effect on graft function and outcome.

Immunoadsorption in severe C4d-positive acute kidney allograft rejection: a randomized controlled trial

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) frequently causes refractory graft dysfunction. This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether immunoadsorption (IA) is effective in the treatment of severe C4d-positive AMR. Ten out of 756 kidney allograft recipients were included. Patients were randomly assigned to IA with protein A (N = 5) or no such treatment (N = 5) with the option of IA rescue after 3 weeks. Enrolled recipients were subjected to tacrolimus conversion and, if indicated, 'anti-cellular' treatment. All IA-treated patients responded to treatment. One death unrelated to IA occurred after successful reversal of rejection. Four control subjects remained dialysis-dependent. With the exception of one patient who developed graft necrosis, non-responders were subjected to rescue IA, however, without success. Because of a high graft loss rate in the control group the study was terminated after a first interim analysis. Even though limited by small patient numbers, this trial suggests efficiency of IA in reversing severe AMR.

Removal of Pathogenic Autoantibodies by Immunoadsorption

Autoimmune diseases result from disrupted tolerance to self-antigens and subsequent damage to tissues and organs. In several diseases, specific autoantibodies have been either proved or suspected to play a role in this process. Consequently, several strategies have been devised in an attempt to discard the destructive immunoglobulins. Currently, both nonselective and epitope-specific methods are applied in several diseases. In this review, we provide a summary of the available data on elimination of pathogenic autoantibodies and discuss the advantages and pitfalls of the different approaches.

Peritransplant immunoadsorption: a strategy enabling transplantation in highly sensitized crossmatch-positive cadaveric kidney allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients with a current positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) are at high risk for hyperacute rejection and graft loss. Immunoadsorption (IA) represents an efficient strategy to remove donor-specific alloantibodies. In this analysis, we evaluated effectiveness of peritransplant IA as an anti-humoral strategy to overcome a current positive CDCXM in presensitized renal allograft recipients.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2003, 40 high risk cadaveric kidney allograft recipients (median CDC panel reactive antibody [PRA] level, 77%; number of retransplants, n = 38) were subjected to peritransplant IA with protein A (one pretransplant IA session followed by a course of repeat posttransplant IA sessions) in addition to preemptive antilymphocyte antibody therapy.

RESULTS

In nine of these patients, a current positive CDCXM was rendered negative by a single pretransplant IA session. Thirty-one recipients had a negative CDCXM already before pretransplant IA. No difference in graft survival was found between CDCXM-positive and CDCXM-negative recipients (3-year graft survival, 78% vs. 71%, P = 0.6). Comparable rates of immunological graft loss at 3 years were observed (11% vs. 13%, P = 0.8). Patient groups did not significantly differ with respect to median serum creatinine at 1 year (1.23 mg/dL [CDCXM-positive] vs. 1.57 mg/dl [CDCXM-negative], P = 0.07) and at the end of follow-up (median 32 months; 1.19 mg/dL vs. 1.63 mg/dL, P = 0.06). Moreover, patient groups showed similar rates of biopsy-proven cellular rejection (11% vs. 20%) or C4d-positive graft dysfunction (33% vs. 32%).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that peritransplant IA enables successful cadaveric kidney transplantation in the context of a positive CDCXM.

Humoral Theory of Transplantation: Mechanism, Prevention, and Treatment

We discuss the potential mechanisms of antibody-induced primary endothelium injury, which includes complement-dependent pathway (membrane attack complex formation, recruitment of inflammatory cells, and complement-complement receptor-mediated phagocytosis) and complement independent pathway antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity. Secondary to endothelium injury, the following pathological reactions are found to be responsible for progressive tissue injury and final graft function loss: platelet activation and thrombosis, pathological smooth muscle and endothelial cell proliferation, and humoral and/or cellular infiltrate-mediated parenchyma damage after endothelium injury. We also introduce three categories of therapeutic strategy in the prevention and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection: (1) inhibition and depletion of antibody producing cells (immunosuppressants, antilymphocyte antibodies, splenectomy); (2) removal or blockage of preexisting or newly developed antibodies (immunoadsorption, plasmapheresis/plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin); and (3) impediment or postponement of antibody-mediated primary and secondary tissue injury (anticoagulation, glucosteroids). In conclusion, because alloantibodies have destructive effect on allografts, alloantibody monitoring becomes extremely important. It will help clinicians to determine a patient's humoral responses against allograft and will therefore direct clinicians to optimize and/or minimize immunosuppressive drug therapy.

Plasmapheresis in C4d-positive Acute Humoral Rejection Following Kidney Transplantation: A Review of 4 Cases

Acute and chronic rejection after kidney transplantation has long been exclusively attributed to cellular and vascular mechanisms. Modern immunosuppressive therapy, therefore, addresses the cellular immune system. Rising experiences in kidney transplantation in the last few decades have revealed that some types of rejection are refractory to the conventional immunosuppressive treatment. Humoral rejection. which has previously been reported as a crucial factor in hyperacute rejection, is now suspected to play also an important role in acute and chronic rejection. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is characterized by immunohistochemical detection of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. As shown for other antibody-mediated diseases, such as some autoimmune diseases, plasmapheresis has been suggested to be an efficient therapeutic approach in AHR. We present four patients with C4d-positive AHR in the early phase after kidney transplantation. In three of the four patients, humoral graft rejection was successfully treated by plasmapheresis. Graft function was significantly improved with a stable long-term outcome. One patient lost the graft. Although the number of patients with C4d-positive AHR treated by plasmapheresis is limited, plasma exchange appears to be an efficient and powerful therapeutic approach to control humoral rejection.

The role of B cells and alloantibody in the host response to human organ allografts

Some human organ transplants deteriorate slowly over a period of years, often developing characteristic syndromes: transplant glomerulopathy (TG) in kidneys, bronchiolitis obliterans in lungs, and coronary artery disease in hearts. In the past, we attributed late graft deterioration to "chronic rejection", a distinct but mysterious immunologic process different from conventional rejection. However, it is likely that much of chronic rejection is explained by conventional T-cell-mediated rejection (TMR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and other insults. Recently, criteria have emerged to now permit us to diagnose AMR in kidney transplants, particularly C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries and circulating antibody against donor human leukocyte antigens (HLA). Some cases with AMR develop TG, although the relationship of TG to AMR is complex. Thus, a specific diagnosis of AMR in kidney can now be made, based on graft damage, C4d deposition, and donor-specific alloantibodies. Criteria for AMR in other organs must be defined. Not all late rejections are AMR; some deteriorating organs probably have smoldering TMR. The diagnosis of late ongoing AMR raises the possibility of treatment to suppress the alloantibody, but efficacy of the available treatments requires further study.

Successful renal transplant outcome after intravenous gamma-globulin treatment of a highly sensitized pediatric recipient

Approximately 10% of patients on the renal transplant (Tx) cadaver waiting list have high (> 20%) panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). Intravenous gamma-globulin (IVIG) has been shown to reduce anti-HLA cytotoxic antibody levels through an anti-idiotypic antibody-blocking effect. We report a successful renal Tx outcome in a 7-yr-old-girl with high PRA levels owing to a failed renal Tx who experienced a significant reduction in PRA levels (from 96% to 0%) concomitant with IVIG therapy. IVIG was infused weekly (500 mg/kg/week) for 3 consecutive weeks every 12 weeks. Thirty-four months after starting IVIG therapy, the PRA activity dropped to zero and IVIG was stopped. Then IVIG therapy was resumed after 8 months due to a rebound in PRA activity to 52%. Forty-four months after starting IVIG therapy, the patient was cross-matched with a cadaver donor who shared three antigens with the first living donor. The cross-match was positive with the recipient's sera obtained prior to IVIG therapy and negative with the recipient's sera obtained post-IVIG therapy. A successful cadaver renal Tx was performed using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATGAM) induction therapy and a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression protocol. IVIG was given (1 g/kg) prior to Tx and at day 4 post-operatively. A single mild acute rejection episode occurred 10 days post-transplantation that responded to pulse methylprednisolone therapy and an increase in the tacrolimus oral dose. We conclude that a prolonged course of IVIG infusions, without immunosuppressive medications or plasmapheresis, is likely to have been beneficial in modulating the immune response in this highly sensitized recipient. Randomized multicenter trials are required to define the role of IVIG in this specific population.

Acute humoral renal allograft rejection

In kidney transplantation, it is well established that donor-specific antibodies can cause substantial graft injury. Hyperacute rejection, now virtually eliminated by routine pretransplant cytotoxic crossmatch testing, represents the prototype of humoral rejection. However, there is now increasing evidence that alloantibody-mediated immune reactions may also cause acute rejection. Acute humoral rejection, which is frequently associated with severe graft dysfunction and immunologic graft loss, represents a particular diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Reliable detection of antibody-mediated graft injury is required to govern the application of antihumoral therapeutic strategies. This review focuses on new approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of acute humoral rejection. Special attention is given to a novel diagnostic marker, the complement split product C4d.

C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection: effective treatment by immunoadsorption

There is increasing evidence for an important pathogenetic role of alloantibodies in acute renal allograft rejection. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) has been reported to be associated with a poor transplant survival. Although treatment modalities for cellular rejection are fairly well established, the optimal treatment for AHR remains undefined. Ten of 352 kidney allograft recipients transplanted at the authors' institution between November 1998 and September 2000 were diagnosed as having AHR, supported by severe graft dysfunction, C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC), and accumulation of granulocytes in PTC. AHR was diagnosed 18.9 +/- 17.5 d posttransplantation. All patients were subjected to immunoadsorption (IA) with protein A (median number of treatment sessions, 9; range, 3 to 17). Seven recipients with additional signs of cellular rejection (according to the Banff classification) received also antithymocyte globulin. In nine of ten patients, AHR was associated with an increase in panel reactive antibody reactivity. A pathogenetic role of alloantibodies was further supported by a positive posttransplant cytotoxic crossmatch in all tested recipients (n = 4). In nine of ten recipients, renal function recovered after initiation of anti-humoral therapy. One patient lost his graft shortly after initiation of specific therapy. Another recipient with partial reversal of AHR returned to dialysis 8 mo after transplantation. Mean serum creatinine in functioning grafts was 2.2 +/- 1.2 mg/dl after the last IA session (n = 9) and 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dl after a follow-up of 14.2 +/- 7.1 mo (n = 8). In conclusion, this study suggests that AHR, characterized by severe graft dysfunction, C4d staining, and peritubular granulocytes, can be effectively treated by timely IA. In the majority of patients, IA treatment can restore excellent graft function over a prolonged time period.

Endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior kidney allograft outcome independently of cellular rejection

BACKGROUND

Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d has been suggested to be a valuable marker for humoral rejection. In this retrospective study we evaluated the clinical impact of C4d deposition in renal allografts with special emphasis on associations between C4d staining patterns and histological features of acute rejection.

METHODS

One hundred and two allograft biopsies obtained from 61 kidney transplants (1-532 days after transplantation; median 14 days) were examined by immunohistochemistry on routine paraffin sections using a novel anti-C4d polyclonal antibody (C4dpAb).

RESULTS

Fourty-two of 102 biopsies showed endothelial C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC). Histopathological analysis revealed a significantly lower frequency of positive C4d staining in biopsies with rather than in those without acute cellular rejection defined by the Banff grading schema (P<0.01). For clinical evaluation, patients were classified according to C4d staining in allografts (C4d(PTC) positive in at least one biopsy, n=31 vs C4d(PTC) negative in all biopsies, n=30). C4d(PTC) positive patients had significantly higher serum creatinine levels than C4d negative patients. Even in the absence of morphological evidence for rejection, differences in serum creatinine levels between C4d(PTC) positive and negative recipients were significant (6 months: 2.01+/-0.75 vs 1.41+/-0.27 mg/dl; 12 months: 1.95+/-0.60 vs 1.36+/- 0.34 mg/dl; 18 months: 1.98+/-0.50 vs 1.47+/-0.31 mg/dl; P<0.05). All patients with rejection resistant to conventional therapy (n=4) were in the C4d(PTC) positive subgroup. All recipients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) >50% (n=8) were C4d(PTC) positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior graft outcome. We provide evidence that this immunohistochemical finding and its clinical impact are not associated with morphological signs of cellular rejection.

Immunoadsorption, current status and future developments

The association of abnormalities in the cellular and humoral immune system with various autoimmune diseases provides the rationale for apheresis technologies. While plasmapheresis or plasma exchange is limited by its non-selective removal of all plasma components, modern apheresis techniques aim to provide more specific elimination according to clinical needs and avoid plasma product replacement. However, the commercialisation has not met the expectations in the early 80's and the number of patients treated by extracorporeal immunoadsorption remains small due to a lack of well-defined controlled trials and limited reimbursement. This review highlights the immunological and technical basis for extracorporeal immunoadsorption, as well as its current status in the treatment of immunologically-mediated diseases.

Role of humoral immune reactions as target for antirejection therapy in recipients of a spousal-donor kidney graft

Excellent graft outcome has been reported for spousal-donor kidney transplantation. In husband-to-wife transplantation, however, a tendency toward inferior graft survival has been described for recipients who were previously pregnant. In our series of spousal-kidney transplantations (nine transplantations; three female recipients), actual graft survival is 100% (median observation time, 339 days). Five patients experienced early allograft rejection. In four transplant recipients, rejection was easily reversible by conventional antirejection therapy. In a multiparous recipient, however, mild interstitial allograft rejection associated with early graft dysfunction was resistant to anticellular treatment (antilymphocyte antibody, tacrolimus rescue therapy). The particular finding of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in peritubular capillaries and the finding of diffuse capillary deposits of the complement split product, C4d, in a posttransplantation biopsy specimen suggested a role of antibody-mediated graft injury. Retrospective flow cytometry cross-matching showed the presence of preformed immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to HLA class I antigens that were not detectable by pretransplantation lymphocytotoxic cross-match testing or screening for panel reactive antibodies. After transplantation, however, complement-fixing antibodies, also presumably triggered by reexposure to spousal-donor HLA antigens, could be detected in the patient's serum. These findings suggested antibody-mediated allograft rejection and led to the initiation of immunoadsorption therapy (14 sessions) with staphylococcal protein A. Selective removal of recipient IgG resulted in complete reversal of graft dysfunction. Our findings suggest that in husband-to-wife transplantation, donor-specific antibodies, presumably triggered by previous pregnancies, might occasionally induce sustained allograft dysfunction. Thus, in this particular setting, a detailed immunologic and histopathologic work-up regarding antibody-mediated allograft dysfunction is warranted because immunoadsorption may be a highly effective treatment modality.

The role of antibodies in acute vascular rejection of pig-to-baboon cardiac transplants

Long-term success in xenotransplantation is currently hampered by acute vascular rejection. The inciting cause of acute vascular rejection is not yet known; however, a variety of observations suggest that the humoral immune response of the recipient against the donor may be involved in the pathogenesis of this process. Using a pig-to-baboon heterotopic cardiac transplant model, we examined the role of antibodies in the development of acute vascular rejection. After transplantation into baboons, hearts from transgenic pigs expressing human decay-accelerating factor and CD59 underwent acute vascular rejection leading to graft failure within 5 d; the histology was characterized by endothelial injury and fibrin thrombi. Hearts from the transgenic pigs transplanted into baboons whose circulating antibodies were depleted using antiimmunoglobulin columns (Therasorb, Unterschleisshein, Germany) did not undergo acute vascular rejection in five of six cases. Biopsies from the xenotransplants in Ig-depleted baboons revealed little or no IgM or IgG, and no histologic evidence of acute vascular rejection in the five cases. Complement activity in the baboons was within the normal range during the period of xenograft survival. In one case, acute vascular rejection of a xenotransplant occurred in a baboon in which the level of antidonor antibody rose after Ig depletion was discontinued. This study provides evidence that antibodies play a significant role in the pathogenesis of acute vascular rejection, and suggests that acute vascular rejection might be prevented or treated by therapies aimed at the humoral immune response to porcine antigens.