Effects of heat/citric acid reprocessing on high-flux polysulfone dialyzers

Dialyzer Reuse and Outcomes of High Flux Dialysis

Background

The bulk of randomized trial evidence for the expanding use of High Flux (HF) hemodialysis worldwide comes from two randomized controlled trials, one of which (HEMODIALYSIS, HEMO) allowed, while the other (Membrane Outcomes Permeability, MPO) excluded, the reuse of membranes. It is not known whether dialyzer reuse has a differential impact on outcomes with HF vs low flyx (LF) dialyzers.

Methods

Proportional Hazards Models and Joint Models for longitudinal measures and survival outcomes were used in HEMO to analyze the relationship between β2-microglobulin (β2M) concentration, flux, and reuse. Meta-analysis and regression techniques were used to synthesize the evidence for HF dialysis from HEMO and MPO.

Findings

In HEMO, minimally reused (< 6 times) HF dialyzers were associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 95%CI: 0.48–0.92, p = 0.015), 0.64 (95%CI: 0.44 – 0.95, p = 0.03), 0.61 (95%CI: 0.41 – 0.90, p = 0.012), 0.53 (95%CI: 0.28 – 1.02, p = 0.057) relative to minimally reused LF ones for all cause, cardiovascular, cardiac and infectious mortality respectively. These relationships reversed for extensively reused membranes (p for interaction between reuse and flux < 0.001, p = 0.005) for death from all cause and cardiovascular causes, while similar trends were noted for cardiac and infectious mortality (p of interaction between reuse and flux of 0.10 and 0.08 respectively). Reduction of β2M explained only 1/3 of the effect of minimally reused HF dialyzers on all cause mortality, while non-β2M related factors explained the apparent attenuation of the benefit with more extensively reused dialyzers. Meta-regression of HEMO and MPO estimated an adjusted HR of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.51–0.78) for non-reused HF dialyzers compared with non-reused LF membranes.

Conclusions

This secondary analysis and synthesis of two large hemodialysis trials supports the widespread use of HF dialyzers in clinical hemodialysis over the last decade. A mechanistic understanding of the effects of HF dialysis and the reuse process on dialyzers may suggest novel biomarkers for uremic toxicity and may accelerate membrane technology innovations that will improve patient outcomes.

Specific adsorption of some complement activation proteins to polysulfone dialysis membranes during hemodialysis

Dialyser bioincompatibility is an important factor contributing to complications of hemodialysis with well known systemic consequences. Here we studied the local processes that occur on dialysis membranes by eluting proteins adsorbed to the polysulfone dialyser membranes of 5 patients after 3 consecutive routine maintenance hemodialysis sessions. At the end of each procedure, a plasma sample was also collected. These eluates and their accompanying plasma samples were separated by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis; all proteins that were present in all patients were analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry; and a ratio of the relative spot intensity of the eluate to plasma was calculated. Of 153 proteins detected, 84 were found in all patients, 57 of which were successfully identified by mass spectrometry as 38 components of 23 unique proteins. In 10 spots the relative eluate intensity differed significantly from that in the plasma, implying preferential adsorption. These proteins included ficolin-2, clusterin, complement C3c fragment, and apolipoprotein A1. Our finding of a selective binding of ficolin-2 to polysulfone membranes suggests a possible role of the lectin complement pathway in blood-dialyser interactions.

Oxidation of proteins adsorbed on hemodialysis membranes and model materials

The cleaning of cellulosic hemodialysis membrane Cuprophan and model materials (glass; polystyrene and polypropylene, as such and surface-oxidized), conditioned by adsorption of blood plasma proteins (HSA, fibrinogen, IgG) was investigated in vitro. Sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) and Renalin, a product containing hydrogen peroxide and peroxyacetic acid, were used as cleaning reagents. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and the use of radiolabeled fibrinogen demonstrated the presence of varying amounts of a polypeptidic residue, with sulfur brought to a high oxidation stage (sulfonate-like). The trends were the same for the three proteins regarding the effectiveness of the oxidizer and the influence of the surface properties. NaClO was much more effective than Renalin to remove the adsorbed proteins. The proteins adsorbed on Cuprophan were more sensitive to the oxidizers, when compared with proteins adsorbed on other materials. This may be due to both the lower protein-surface affinity, as indicated by radiochemical measurements, and the sensitivity of the material itself to the oxidizer, as revealed by weight loss measurements. These results support the attribution of hemocompatibility improvement after regeneration of Cuprophan with Renalin to the masking of the activating surface by a residue from previously adsorbed proteins.

Water permeability of high-flux dialyzer membranes after Renalin reprocessing

Dialysis with high-flux membranes is widely used, in part, because they are thought to increase the removal of middle molecules when compared with low-flux membranes. Dialyzer reprocessing; however, is thought to alter middle molecule clearance. Renalin, a mixture of germicidal agents, has widespread use in dialyzer reprocessing. We determined the effect of Renalin reprocessing on the water permeability of three different dialyzers of Fresenius (F80A and 200A) and Gambro (17R) manufacture using the dead-end filtration method. Two hundred and seventeen, predominantly used but some new, dialyzers were evaluated. Water permeability of the used, but not the new, dialyzers fell abruptly and dramatically with reprocessing. The permeability fell almost 70% in the F80A dialyzer after three reprocessing procedures with similar, but somewhat slower declines, seen in the other two dialyzers. We conclude that there is a decline in water permeability seen in Renalin reprocessed dialyzers. This factor and the associated change in solute clearance and ultrafiltration characteristics should be considered in assessing the effectiveness of dialyzer reprocessing.

Dialyzer Reuse-Part II: Advantages and Disadvantages

Although single dialyzer use and reuse by chemical reprocessing are both associated with some complications, there is no definitive advantage to either in this respect. Some complications occur mainly at the first use of a dialyzer: a new cellophane or cuprophane membrane may activate the complement system, or a noxious agent may be introduced to the dialyzer during production or generated during storage. These agents may not be completely removed during the routine rinsing procedure. The reuse of dialyzers is associated with environmental contamination, allergic reactions, residual chemical infusion (rebound release), inadequate concentration of disinfectants, and pyrogen reactions. Bleach used during reprocessing causes a progressive increase in dialyzer permeability to larger molecules, including albumin. Reprocessing methods without the use of bleach are associated with progressive decreases in membrane permeability, particularly to larger molecules. Most comparative studies have not shown differences in mortality between centers reusing and those not reusing dialyzers, however, the largest cluster of dialysis-related deaths occurred with single-use dialyzers due to the presence of perfluorohydrocarbon introduced during the manufacturing process and not completely removed during preparation of the dialyzers before the dialysis procedure. The cost savings associated with reuse is substantial, especially with more expensive, high-flux synthetic membrane dialyzers. With reuse, some dialysis centers can afford to utilize more efficient dialyzers that are more expensive; consequently they provide a higher dose of dialysis and reduce mortality. Some studies have shown minimally higher morbidity with chemical reuse, depending on the method. Waste disposal is definitely decreased with the reuse of dialyzers, thus environmental impacts are lessened, particularly if reprocessing is done by heat disinfection. It is safe to predict that dialyzer reuse in dialysis centers will continue because it also saves money for the providers. Saving both time for the patient and money for the provider were the main motivations to design a new machine for daily home hemodialysis. The machine, developed in the 1990s, cleans and heat disinfects the dialyzer and lines in situ so they do not need to be changed for a month. In contrast, reuse of dialyzers in home hemodialysis patients treated with other hemodialysis machines is becoming less popular and is almost extinct.

Beta-2 microglobulin in ESRD: an in-depth review

Beta-2 microglobulin is the most widely studied low-molecular-weight protein in end-stage renal disease. It is known to cause dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), by virtue of its retention when renal function fails, its deposition in tissues, its aggregation into fibrils, and its ability to become glycosylated. The onset of DRA may be protracted by the use of noncellulosic membranes, especially when high-volume hemodiafiltration is used in the treatment of renal failure. Adsorptive methods have been developed to improve the removal of beta-2 microglobulin. There seems to be a relative risk reduction in mortality when patients are treated with dialysis membranes that have a higher clearance of beta-2 microglobulin.

Effects of reuse and bleach/formaldehyde reprocessing on polysulfone and polyamide hemodialyzers

The surface features, morphology, and blood interactions of fibers from pristine, bleach/formaldehyde reprocessed, and reused Fresenius Polysulfone High Flux (Hemoflow F80B) hemodialyzers and Gambro Polyflux 21S Polyamide hemodialyzers have been studied. SEM images of fibers from both hemodialyzer types revealed a dense skin layer on the inner surface and a relatively thick porous layer on the outer surface. The 21S polyamide support layer consisted of interconnected highly porous structures. Environmental scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy images of both membrane types showed alterations in morphology due to reprocessing and reuse; however the changes were more marked for the 21S polyamide dialyzers. Fluorescence microscopy images showed only minimal fluorescence associated with the fibers after patient use and reprocessing, suggesting that blood derived deposits were removed by processing. The protein layers formed on pristine and reused hemodialyzer membranes during clinical use were studied using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Before bleach/formaldehyde treatment, protein layers of considerable amount and complexity were found on the blood side of singly and multiply used dialyzers. Proteins adsorbed on the dialysate side were predominantly in the molecular mass region below 30 kDa. However, some higher molecular mass proteins were detected on the dialysate side of the 21 S polyamide dialyzers. Very little protein was detected on dialyzers that were treated with bleach/formaldehyde after dialysis, regardless of whether they had been used/reprocessed once or 12 times.