Ropinirole in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson's disease

Non-Ergot Dopamine Agonists and the Risk of Heart Failure and Other Adverse Cardiovascular Reactions in Parkinson's Disease

Reports suggest possible risks of adverse cardiovascular reactions, including heart failure, associated with non-ergot dopamine agonist (DA) use in Parkinson's disease (PD). The objectives of our review were to evaluate the risk of heart failure and other adverse cardiovascular reactions in PD patients who received a non-ergot DA compared with other anti-PD pharmacological interventions, placebo, or no intervention. Studies were identified via searches of six bibliographic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) were eligible for study inclusion. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to estimate adverse cardiovascular reaction risks. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. In total, forty-four studies (thirty-six RCTs and eight NRS) satisfied our inclusion criteria. A single RCT found no significant difference in the risk of heart failure with ropinirole compared with bromocriptine (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 2.04; low certainty). Conversely, three case-control studies reported a risk of heart failure with non-ergot DA treatment. The quality of evidence for the risk of heart failure was judged as low or very low. Findings suggest that non-ergot DA use may be associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including heart failure. Studies are needed to better understand cardiovascular risks associated with PD treatment.

Tyrosine Hydroxylase Inhibitors and Dopamine Receptor Agonists Combination Therapy for Parkinson's Disease

There are currently no disease-modifying therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder associated with dopaminergic neuronal loss. There is increasing evidence that endogenous dopamine (DA) can be a pathological factor in neurodegeneration in PD. Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is the key rate-limiting enzyme for DA generation. Drugs that inhibit TH, such as alpha-methyltyrosine (α-MT), have recently been shown to protect against neurodegeneration in various PD models. DA receptor agonists can activate post-synaptic DA receptors to alleviate DA-deficiency-induced PD symptoms. However, DA receptor agonists have no therapeutic effects against neurodegeneration. Thus, a combination therapy with DA receptor agonists plus TH inhibitors may be an attractive therapeutic approach. TH inhibitors can protect and promote the survival of remaining dopaminergic neurons in PD patients' brains, whereas DA receptor agonists activate post-synaptic DA receptors to alleviate PD symptoms. Additionally, other PD drugs, such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and anticholinergic drugs, may be used as adjunctive medications to improve therapeutic effects. This multi-drug cocktail may represent a novel strategy to protect against progressive dopaminergic neurodegeneration and alleviate PD disease progression.

Comparative efficacy and safety of adjunctive drugs to levodopa for fluctuating Parkinson's disease - network meta-analysis

It remains unclear which adjunctive drug for Parkinson's disease (PD) in combination with levodopa is more effective, tolerable, and safe. We aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety among anti-PD drugs from several classes in patients with fluctuating PD who received levodopa through network meta-analysis (NMA). Twelve anti-PD drugs belonging to 4 different drug classes (dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors, and an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist) were selected. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing placebo with anti-PD drug or among anti-PD drugs in patients with PD who experienced motor fluctuations or wearing-off and received levodopa. We included 54 RCTs in the analysis. The NMA was performed under a frequentist framework using a random-effects model. The efficacy outcome was change in daily off-time, and the tolerability outcome was discontinuation due to all causes. Safety outcomes included discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs, dyskinesia, hallucination, and orthostatic hypotension. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) in the NMA, ropinirole transdermal patch (SUCRA, 0.861) ranked the highest in efficacy, followed by pramipexole (0.762), ropinirole extended release (ER) (0.750), and safinamide (0.691). In terms of tolerability, ropinirole (0.954) ranked the highest, followed by pramipexole (0.857), safinamide (0.717), and ropinirole ER (0.708). Each anti-PD drug had different SUCRA ranking profiles for the safety outcomes. These findings suggest that ropinirole, pramipexole, and safinamide are well-balanced anti-PD drugs that satisfy both efficacy and tolerability outcomes.

Safety review of current pharmacotherapies for levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Levodopa remains the gold standard for treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients develop complications with disease progression, necessitating adjunctive therapy to control fluctuations in motor and non-motor symptoms and dyskinesia. Knowledge of medication safety and tolerability is critical to ascertain the benefit-risk ratio and select an adjunctive therapy that provides the highest chance for medication adherence. Posing a challenge are the sheer abundance of options, stemming from the development of several new drugs in recent years, as well as differences in commercial drug availability worldwide.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of current US FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for levodopa-treated PD patients, including dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitors, catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist amantadine, and the adenosine receptor antagonist istradefylline. Data were taken from pivotal phase III randomized controlled and post-surveillance studies, when available, that directly led to FDA-approval.

EXPERT OPINION

No strong evidence exists to support use of a specific adjunctive treatment for improving Off time. Only one medication has demonstrated improvement in dyskinesia in levodopa-treated PD patients; however, every patient cannot tolerate it and therefore adjunctive therapy should be tailored to an individual's symptoms and risk for specific adverse effects.

Dose Optimization of Apomorphine Sublingual Film for OFF Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: Is the Prophylactic Use of an Antiemetic Necessary?

BACKGROUND

Nausea is common upon initiating dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD); however, pretreatment with an antiemetic is recommended only when initiating apomorphine formulations.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the need for prophylactic antiemetic use during dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film (SL-APO).

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of a Phase III study evaluated nausea and vomiting treatment-emergent adverse events in patients with PD who underwent SL-APO dose optimization (10-35 mg; 5-mg increments) to achieve a tolerable FULL ON. Frequencies of nausea and vomiting were described for patients who did versus did not use an antiemetic during dose optimization and by patient subgroups based on extrinsic and intrinsic factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 43.7% (196/449) of patients did not use an antiemetic during dose optimization; most of these patients (86.2% [169/196]) achieved an effective and tolerable SL-APO dose. In patients who did not use an antiemetic, nausea (12.2% [24/196]) and vomiting (0.5% [1/196]) were uncommon. An antiemetic was used in 56.3% (253/449) of patients, with 17.0% (43/253) and 2.4% (6/253) experiencing nausea and vomiting, respectively. All events of nausea (14.9% [67/449]) and vomiting (1.6% [7/449]) were of mild-to-moderate severity except for 1 event each. Irrespective of antiemetic use, among patients without baseline dopamine agonist use, nausea and vomiting rates were 25.2% (40/159) and 3.8% (6/159); in those already using dopamine agonists, rates were 9.3% (27/290) and 0.3% (1/290).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic treatment with an antiemetic is not necessary for most patients who initiate SL-APO for the treatment of OFF episodes in PD.

Systematic review for the prevention and management of falls and fear of falling in patients with Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize recent empirical evidence for the prevention and management of falls and fear of falling in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

DATA SOURCE

Database from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA COLLECTION

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases for studies published from inception to February 27, 2021. Inclusion criteria were nonreview articles on prevention and management measures related to falls and fall prevention in Parkinson's disease patients.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We selected 45 articles and conducted in-depth research and discussion. According to the causes of falls in PD patients, they were divided into five directions, namely physical status, pre-existing conditions, environment, medical care, and cognition. In the cognitive domain, we focused on the fear of falling. On the above basis, we constructed a fall prevention model, which is a tertiary prevention health care network, based on The Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool to provide ideas for the prevention and management of falling and fear of falling in PD patients in clinical practice CONCLUSIONS: Falls and fear of falls in patients with Parkinson's disease can be reduced by effective clinical prevention and management. Future studies are needed to explore the efficacy of treatment and prevention of falls and fear of falls.

The effect and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It is necessary to conduct a meta-analysis of the clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD), to explore the effects and safety of ropinirole, and to provide a theoretical basis for clinically safe and rational drug use.

METHODS

RCTs on the effectiveness and safety of ropinirole in the treatment of PD were searched. We searched Dutch medical literature database, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Knowledge Service Platform up to December 15, 2020. The Cochrane risk bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature, and the RevMan5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 12 RCTs with 3341 patients were included. The changes of Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part II score (mean difference = -2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.82 to -1.64) and Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III scores (mean difference = -4.93, 95%CI -5.25 to -4.61) in the ropinirole group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The incidence of dizziness (odd risk [OR] = 1.85, 95%CI 1.50-2.28), nausea (OR = 2.17, 95%CI 1.81-2.59), vomiting (OR = 2.73, 95%CI 1.47-5.09), and lethargy (OR = 2.19, 95%CI 1.39-3.44) in the ropinirole group was significantly higher than that in the control group (all P < .05), and there were no significant differences in the incidence of headache (OR = 1.14, 95%CI 0.79-1.65) and insomnia (OR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.72-1.55) were found between 2 groups (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Ropinirole can help improve the ability of daily living and exercise function of PD patients, but it will increase the incidence of related adverse reactions, which needs to be further confirmed by subsequent large-scale, high-quality RCTs.

Comparative effectiveness of dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase type-B inhibitors for Parkinson's disease: a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the comparative effectiveness of dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase type-B (MAO-B) inhibitors available for treatment of Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search identifying randomized controlled trials investigating 4 dopamine agonists (cabergoline, pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine) and 3 MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline, rasagiline, safinamide) for Parkinson's disease. We extracted and pooled data from included clinical trials in a joint model allowing both direct and indirect comparison of the seven drugs. We considered dopamine agonists and MAO-B inhibitors given as monotherapy or in combination with levodopa. Selected endpoints were change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score, serious adverse events and withdrawals. We estimated the relative effectiveness of each dopamine agonist and MAO-B inhibitor versus comparator drug.

RESULTS

Altogether, 79 publications were included in the analysis. We found all the investigated drugs to be effective compared with placebo when given as monotherapy except safinamide. When considering combination treatment, the estimated relative effects of selegiline, pramipexole, ropinirole, rotigotine, cabergoline, rasagiline and safinamide were 2.316 (1.819, 2.951), 2.091 (1.889, 2.317), 2.037 (1.804, 2.294), 1.912 (1.716, 2.129), 1.664 (1.113, 2.418), 1.584 (1.379, 1.820) and 1.179 (1.031, 1.352), respectively, compared with joint placebo and levodopa treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Dopamine agonists were found to be effective as treatment for Parkinson's disease, both when given as monotherapy and in combination with levodopa. Selegiline and rasagiline were also found to be effective for treating Parkinson's disease, and selegiline was the best option in combination with levodopa among all the drugs investigated.

Medical Management and Prevention of Motor Complications in Parkinson's Disease

Levodopa is the most effective medication for the treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. However, over time, the clinical response to levodopa becomes complicated by a reduction in the duration and reliability of motor improvement (motor fluctuations) and the emergence of involuntary movements (levodopa-induced dyskinesia). Strategies that have been attempted in an effort to delay the development of these motor complications include levodopa sparing and continuous dopaminergic therapy. Once motor complications occur, a wide array of medical treatments is available to maximize motor function through the day while limiting dyskinesia. Here, we review the clinical features, epidemiology, and risk factors for the development of motor complications, as well as strategies for their prevention and medical management.

Indirect Comparison of Ropinirole and Pramipexole as Levodopa Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of ropinirole and pramipexole as adjunctive therapies to levodopa (L-dopa) for the management of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), via a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Twenty-one double-blind randomised controlled trials of patients with advanced PD with motor fluctuations receiving L-dopa comparing ropinirole or pramipexole with comparators were identified from 2550 publications. Bayesian indirect comparison methods were applied to independently review efficacy outcomes including off-time reduction, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Activity of Daily Living (UPDRS-ADL) and UPDRS-motor scores, and safety outcomes including adverse events (AE) and patient withdrawals, to determine indirect treatment comparison mean differences (MD) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The indirect efficacy comparison resulted in a statistically nonsignificant off-time reduction difference (hours) of ropinirole-sustained release (SR) versus pramipexole-immediate release (MD - 0.25; 95% CI - 0.71, 0.21) and ropinirole-SR versus pramipexole-extended release (ER) (MD 0.18; 95% CI - 0.40, 0.76). Ropinirole-SR adjunctive treatment showed a tendency towards more improvement in UPDRS-ADL score (MD 1.24; 95% CI 0.23, 2.24) than adjunctive treatment of pramipexole-ER. Pramipexole-ER may be less likely to induce somnolence as an AE compared with ropinirole-SR (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23, 0.89). However, there were no statistically significant differences in UPDRS-motor score reduction, incidence of dyskinesia, hallucination, hypotension, insomnia and nausea, or withdrawals due to AE, for any reason.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive therapy with ropinirole-SR or pramipexole appears to offer similar efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced PD on the basis of this indirect comparison.

FUNDING

GSK.

Predictive Value of Parkinsonian Primates in Pharmacologic Studies: A Comparison between the Macaque, Marmoset, and Squirrel Monkey

The 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-lesioned primate is the gold-standard animal model of Parkinson disease (PD) and has been used to assess the effectiveness of experimental drugs on dyskinesia, parkinsonism, and psychosis. Three species have been used in most studies-the macaque, marmoset, and squirrel monkey-the last much less so than the first two species; however, the predictive value of each species at forecasting clinical efficacy, or lack thereof, is poorly documented. Here, we have reviewed all the published literature detailing pharmacologic studies that assessed the effects of experimental drugs on dyskinesia, parkinsonism, and psychosis in each of these species and have calculated their predictive value of success and failure at the clinical level. We found that, for dyskinesia, the macaque has a positive predictive value of 87.5% and a false-positive rate of 38.1%, whereas the marmoset has a positive predictive value of 76.9% and a false-positive rate of 15.6%. For parkinsonism, the macaque has a positive predictive value of 68.2% and a false-positive rate of 44.4%, whereas the marmoset has a positive predictive value of 86.9% and a false-positive rate of 41.7%. No drug that alleviates psychosis in the clinic has shown efficacy at doing so in the macaque, whereas the marmoset has 100% positive predictive value. The small number of studies conducted in the squirrel monkey precluded us from calculating its predictive efficacy. We hope our results will help in the design of pharmacologic experiments and will facilitate the drug discovery and development process in PD.

Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a long term disorder affects the central nervous system and we aim to determine the relative efficacy of the current available drugs used in PD. Firstly, we performed a systematic review in current literature and eligible studies were retrieved from online databases, relevant data were extracted. Efficacy of these medications was assessed by different Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scales (UPDRS). Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were produced by pairwise or network meta-analysis (NMA). Finally, we performed a cluster analysis for the included medications with respect to their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Pairwise meta-analysis suggests that selegiline had a higher ranking in UPDRS II, UPDRS III and UPDRS total than bromocriptine and levodopa. Selegiline was more tolerable than bromocriptine (OR = 0.62, CI: 0.39 to 0.98) and pramipexole was less tolerable than levodopa (OR = 1.43, CI = 1.00 to 2.04). Results of NMA indicate that patients with levodopa, pramipexole, ropinirole and selegiline exhibited a significantly improved UPDRS III than those with lazabemide. To sum up, levodopa, selegiline, ropinirole and rotigotine were recommended for PD patients as they appeared relatively high efficacy and tolerability.

Non-Ergot Dopamine Agonists Do Not Increase the Risk of Heart Failure in Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

In recent years, some observational studies suggested that pramipexole, a non-ergot dopamine agonist (DA) used for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD), may increase the risk of heart failure (HF). However, the limitations inherent in observational studies made it difficult to determine whether the excess of incident HF was related to the drug or to other determinants. Thus, some concerns remained regarding the increased putative HF risk associated with non-ergot DAs as a class or individually.

Methods

In our meta-analysis, primary endpoint was the risk of incident HF in patients with PD treated with non-ergot DAs compared to those treated with monotherapy with levodopa. Secondary outcome measures were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. For these purposes, only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered, provided that they offered complete outcome data pertaining to the incident HF, all-cause mortality and risk of cardiovascular events. Systematic searches were performed in the databases of PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrial.gov up to May 2015. The effect size was estimated using the pooled relative risk (RR) of non-ergot DAs versus placebo on incident HF as well as on all-cause mortality or cardiovascular events.

Results

Six out of 27 RCTs reported at least one case of incident HF; therefore, we included them in the RR estimate, whereas 13 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis for mortality rates and 22 RCTs were included to evaluate cardiovascular events. Treatment with non-ergot DAs did not reveal an increase in the risk of incident HF as compared with the placebo group (pooled RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.30 - 2.90; P = 0.893). Similarly, patients treated with non-ergot DAs did not show any significant differences compared to controls with regard to all-cause mortality (pooled RR: 0.617; 95% CI: 0.330 - 1.153; P = 0.13) as well as with regard to cardiovascular events (pooled RR: 1.067; 95% CI: 0.663 - 1.717; P = 0.789).

Conclusions

The use of non-ergot DAs in PD patients was not associated with an increased risk of incident HF, nor was it shown to increase the overall mortality or the risk of cardiovascular events compared to the PD patients taking monotherapy with levodopa alone. However, larger studies are warranted to confirm the cardiovascular safety of non-ergot DAs for PD management.

[A current view on dopamine receptor agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease]

Dopamine receptor agonists (DRA) is a widely used group of antiparkinsonian drugs. The article presents short results: related to the mechanism of the stimulation of different types of dopamine receptors. The advantages of this group of drugs compared to levodopa medications as well as the studies of DRA in vitro and in vivo are described. Multiple studies demonstrate an important role of DRA in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD): a good control of motor symptoms, the possibility of monotherapy in the early stages of disease, the reduced risk of motor complications compared to start therapy with levodopa and decrease in the duration of "OFF-period" and UPDRS scores as well as the possibility to reduce the dose of levodopa in case of combined treatment with levodopa containing preparations. Pramipexole has demonstrated the efficacy in the treatment of persistent tremor and depression in double-blind placebo-controlled trials. A significant improvement of quality of life index has been shown in PD patients treated with these drugs. Side-effects often limited the use of DRA in clinical practice. The data on the dose equivalence of different DRA are recommended to use if it is necessary to switch from one DRA to another.

An open-label extension study to evaluate the safety of ropinirole prolonged release in Chinese patients with advanced Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

This open-label extension (OLE) study evaluated the safety profile of ropinirole prolonged release (PR) administered for 24 weeks as adjunctive to levodopa in Chinese patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

This was a 24 week, flexible-dose, OLE study in Chinese patients with advanced PD who received 24 week treatment with ropinirole PR in the preceding double-blind (DB), phase III study (NCT01154166) and had no break in receiving study treatment while switching from the DB study to the OLE study. In the OLE study, patients received ropinirole PR once daily, starting with 2 mg/d and increasing up to 8 mg/d at week 4 (2 mg increment/week); if tolerable, the dose could be further increased in 4 mg increments up to 24 mg/d according to clinical judgment. There were no efficacy assessments. Safety assessments included monitoring adverse events (AEs), neurological examination, Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale questionnaire, liver chemistry, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Of the 295 enrolled patients, 282 completed the study. The most common reason for withdrawal was AEs (n = 9, 3.1%). The mean duration to ropinirole PR treatment was 173.1 days and an overall median daily dose of ropinirole was 8 mg (range: 2-24 mg). Overall, 114 (38.6%) patients experienced on-treatment AEs; the most frequent reported AEs ( ≥ 2%) were dyskinesia (6.1%), dizziness (4.1%), nausea (3.4%), hallucinations (3.4%), somnolence (2.7%) and decreased weight (2.4%). Sixty-eight patients (23.1%) experienced treatment-related AEs. Six patients experienced serious AEs (SAEs), of which hallucination was determined to be a treatment-related SAE. There were no other significant safety findings. No new safety signals for ropinirole were identified.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of ropinirole was consistent with the preceding DB study and also with the established safety profile for ropinirole. Results support the long-term use of ropinirole PR as an adjunctive to levodopa in Chinese patients with advanced PD. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 1536574.

Continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS)-based treatment in Parkinson's disease patients with motor complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify randomized trials involving continuous dopaminergic stimulation (CDS) in PD patients with motor complications. Difference between n groups was assessed by partitioning heterogeneity and using the χ2 distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom, where n equals the number of groups. We looked for publication bias using funnel plotting, Egger's test and Begg's test. Twenty Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were included. The results showed that CDS could evidently improve the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II (p < 0.0001), part III (P < 0.00001) and UPDRS total score (p < 0.00001). There was also a statistical discrepancy in off time reduction (p < 0.00001) and prolongation of on time (p < 0.00001) by the CDS therapy compared with control groups. Meanwhile, the results of this study showed obvious side effects in the CDS therapy compared with the placebo, especially at the expense of increased dyskinesia (23.4% vs 11.7%). The present study showed that CDS was beneficial in the treatment of PD patients with motor complications. But the incidence of the side events is more common than placebo.

Treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, gait and postural instability and a variety of nonmotor symptoms. While these and other motor signs typically improve with levodopa, the so-called axial signs, such as dysarthria, dysphagia, postural instability and freezing, and most nonmotor signs, such as depression, cognitive decline and dysautonomia, usually do not respond satisfactorily to levodopa. Furthermore, the use of levodopa may be limited by the development of motor fluctuations, dyskinesias and other adverse effects. This manuscript reviews the medical management of advanced Parkinson's disease, focusing on the treatment of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias and of nonmotor and nonlevodopa responsive symptoms.

Nonergot dopamine-receptor agonists for treating Parkinson's disease - a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of the three nonergot dopamine-receptor agonists (DAs) pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine for the treatment of early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed separately for early and advanced PD, and at time points 11-16 and 24-28 weeks. Outcomes for early PD included improvement on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) activities in daily life (UPDRS-II), motor function (UPDRS-III), and their subtotal (UPDRS-II + III). Outcomes for advanced PD also included daily "off time" (hours), but not UPDRS-II + III.

RESULTS

Totals of 23 and 24 trials informed early and advanced PD analyses. For early PD UPDRS-II at 11-16 weeks, pramipexole and rotigotine were statistically significantly superior to placebo, but ropinirole was not. For UPDRS-III and UPDRS-II + III, all DAs were statistically significantly better than placebo and exhibited similar improvements. At 24-28 weeks, results were also statistically significant for all DAs versus placebo, and the magnitudes of improvements were similar for pramipexole, ropinirole and rotigotine. Advanced PD improvements on UPDRS-II, UPRDS-III, and off time were statistically significant for pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine versus placebo. At 11-16 weeks, rotigotine yielded slightly smaller effects than ropinirole and pramipexole, but credible intervals on differences were wide. For off time, results were near identical. At 24-28 weeks, results were similar for all three outcomes. Ropinirole yielded a slightly higher improvement on UPDRS-III, but a slightly smaller improvement in off time.

CONCLUSION

Our analyses suggest that pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine exhibit similar efficacy in the treatment of early and advanced PD.

Dopamine receptor agonists for Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Prolonged administration of l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA) for Parkinson's disease (PD) is hampered by motor complications related to the progressive incapacity of residual nigrostriatal neurons to properly utilize the drug. Direct stimulation of dopaminergic (DAergic) receptors with specific compounds (DA agonists) has, therefore, become an additional therapeutic tool for PD.

AREAS COVERED

DA agonists have considerable anti-parkinsonian symptomatic efficacy, although they are less potent than l-DOPA. This review summarizes pre-clinical and clinical data on DA agonists and their role in treating PD. Specific focus was put on second-generation, first-line non-ergolinic DA agonists and their motor, non-motor and putative neuroprotective effects. The anti-parkinsonian potential of recently developed DA agonists that reached Phase II and III clinical trials was also addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

DA agonists can be useful along the whole natural course of PD, as monotherapy in the initial phase or combined with l-DOPA in advanced PD. Extended-release formulations have been developed for second-generation DA agonists, which are better appreciated by patients. Neuroprotective properties have been proposed for DA agonists, based on pre-clinical studies, but never convincingly demonstrated in patients. New DA agonists, with better symptomatic efficacy and devoid of the side effects that characterize current compounds, are needed.

Summary of the recommendations of the EFNS/MDS-ES review on therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the 2010 EFNS/MDS-ES evidence-based treatment recommendations for the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). This summary includes the treatment recommendations for early and late PD.

METHODS

For the 2010 publication, a literature search was undertaken for articles published up to September 2009. For this summary, an additional literature search was undertaken up to December 2010. Classification of scientific evidence and the rating of recommendations were made according to the EFNS guidance. In cases where there was insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement ('good practice point') is made.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

For each clinical indication, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence.

Clinical aspects and management of levodopa-induced dyskinesia

In Parkinson's disease, one of the most troublesome dilemmas is the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. After a few years, chronic treatment with levodopa is associated with the development of dyskinesias. Strategies to delay or to reduce dyskinesias are based on the change of levodopa dosing or the early use of dopamine agonists. Dopamine agonists with different pharmacological profile are available. Our paper was aimed to analyse the clinical impact and the management of dyskinesias with dopamine agonists.

Patient diaries as a clinical endpoint in Parkinson's disease clinical trials

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder with an estimated 4 million patients worldwide. L-dopa is standard, and often initial, therapy for patients with this condition; however, with continued dopaminergic treatment and as the disease progresses, the majority of patients experience complications such as "wearing-off" symptoms, dyskinesias, and other motor complications. These complications may become disabling and profoundly affect quality of life. Treatment modification and combination therapies with L-dopa, dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, and catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors are commonly used to manage complications. In recent years regulatory agencies, clinical researchers, and sponsors have widely accepted and utilized changes in "ON" and "OFF" time measured by Patient Hauser Diaries as endpoints for measuring efficacy of therapeutics seeking approval for symptomatic treatment of PD. Successful antiparkinsonian medications have been associated with treatment effects of more than 1 h in either reduction of "OFF" time of increase in "ON" time. Accurate "ON" and "OFF" time registration during clinical studies requires rigorous patient training. Reduced compliance, recall bias and diary fatigue are common problems seen with patient diary reported measures. Electronic diaries may help reducing some of these problems but may be associated with other challenges in large, multicenter studies.

Dopamine receptor agonists for the treatment of early or advanced Parkinson's disease

Dopamine receptor agonists are indicated for the symptomatic treatment of early, moderate or advanced Parkinson's disease as well as for the reduction of levodopa-related motor complications. Ergolinic dopamine agonists, such as bromocriptine or pergolide, were initially developed and marketed, and then non-ergolinic dopamine agonists, such as pramipexole and ropinirole, were introduced, reducing the risk of drug-induced fibrotic reactions. Once-daily, controlled-release oral and transdermal formulations have been developed aiming at providing more stable 24-hour plasma drug concentrations and more convenient administration. A disease-modifying effect of dopamine agonists has not been demonstrated clinically. As with any other drug, dopamine agonists can also cause adverse drug reactions, which can be related or unrelated to dopaminergic hyperactivation. Dopaminergic reactions include nausea, hallucinations, confusion and orthostatic hypotension, among others, which were readily identified in pre-marketing clinical trials. During post-marketing surveillance, important adverse reactions were identified, such as daytime somnolence, impulse-control disorders and heart valve fibrosis. Other issues, including the efficacy of dopamine agonists for the treatment of non-motor symptoms, remain under evaluation.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant treatment to levodopa therapy in Parkinson s disease patients with motor complications

BACKGROUND

One of the complications of long-term treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) with levodopa is the development of motor complications. Generally, when motor complications develop, clinicians add in an additional drug (to the levodopa regimen) from one of three other classes of anti-Parkinsonian treatments (dopamine agonists, catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors (COMTIs) or monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (MAOBIs)). However, despite trials having shown that these drugs are beneficial compared to placebo, it remains unclear as to the best way to treat patients experiencing motor complications and whether one class of drug is more effective than another.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aims to assess more reliably the benefits and risks of the three classes of drugs (dopamine agonists, COMTIs and MAOBIs) currently used as adjuvant treatment to levodopa in PD patients suffering from motor complications. The three drug classes were compared with the aim of determining whether one class of drug provides better symptomatic control than another.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, LILACS and Web of Science, plus major journals in the field, abstract books, conference proceedings and reference lists of retrieved publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing an orally administered dopamine agonist, COMTI or MAOBI versus placebo, both on a background of levodopa therapy, in PD patients experiencing motor complications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data on off-time, levodopa dose, motor complications, side-effects, treatment concordance, clinician-rated disability, mortality, quality of life and health economic data.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-four eligible trials, involving 8436 participants were identified. Compared to placebo, adjuvant therapy significantly reduced off-time (-1.05 hours/day, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.19 to -0.90; P<0.00001), the required levodopa dose (-55.65 mg/day, CI -62.67 to -48.62; P<0.00001) and improved UPDRS scores (UPDRS ADL score: -1.31 points, CI -1.62 to -0.99; P<0.00001; UPDRS motor score: -2.84 points, CI -3.36 to -2.32; P<0.00001; UPDRS total score: -3.26 points, CI -4.52 to -2.00; P<0.00001). However, dyskinesia (odds ratio (OR) 2.50, CI 2.21 to 2.84; P<0.00001) and side-effects including constipation (OR 3.19, CI 2.17 to 4.68; P<0.00001), dizziness (OR 1.57, CI 1.30 to 1.90; P<0.00001), dry mouth (OR 2.33, CI 1.22 to 4.47; P=0.01), hallucinations (OR 2.16, CI 1.70 to 2.74; P<0.00001), hypotension (OR 1.47, CI 1.18 to 1.83; P=0.0007), insomnia (OR 1.38, CI 1.09 to 1.74; P=0.007), nausea (OR 1.78, CI 1.53 to 2.07; P<0.00001), somnolence (OR 1.87, CI 1.40 to 2.51; P<0.0001) and vomiting (OR 2.56, CI 1.67 to 3.93; P<0.0001) were all increased with adjuvant therapy.Indirect comparisons of the three drug classes suggested that dopamine agonists were more efficacious in reducing off-time (dopamine agonist: -1.54 hours/day; COMTI: -0.83 hours/day; MAOBI: -0.93 hours/day; test for heterogeneity between drug classes P=0.0003) and levodopa dose (dopamine agonist: -116 mg/day; COMTI: -52 mg/day; MAOBI: -29 mg/day; test for heterogeneity between drug classes P<0.00001). UPDRS scores also improved more with dopamine agonists than with COMTI or MAOBI (UPDRS total scores - dopamine agonist: -10.01 points versus COMTI: -1.46 points versus MAOBI: -2.20 points; test for heterogeneity between drug classes P<0.00001), although more dyskinesia were seen with dopamine agonists (OR 2.70) and COMTI (OR 2.50) than with MAOBI (OR 0.94) (test for heterogeneity between drug classes P=0.009). Although the increase in the overall incidence of side-effects was generally more marked with dopamine agonists (OR 1.52) and COMTI (OR 2.0) than with MAOBI (OR 1.32), heterogeneity between drug classes was only of borderline significance (P=0.07).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to placebo, adjuvant therapy reduces off-time, levodopa dose, and improves UPDRS scores in PD patients who develop motor complications on levodopa therapy. However, this is at the expense of increased dyskinesia and numerous other side-effects. Indirect comparisons suggest that dopamine agonist therapy may be more effective than COMTI and MAOBI therapy, which have comparable efficacy. However, as indirect comparisons should be interpreted with caution, direct head-to-head randomised trials assessing the impact of these different drug classes on overall patient-rated quality of life are needed.

Pharmacologic Options for Treatment of Levodopa-Associated ``Wearing Off''

Levodopa remains the gold standard drug for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, but the combination of disease progression and prolonged treatment can lead to ``wearing-off'' problems in the majority of patients. This constitutes the onset of motor fluctuations which includes nonmotor sensory, psychiatric, and autonomic ``off '' symptoms. There are several pharmacologic options to minimize the ``wearing-off'' phenomenon, including adjustment of levodopa treatment, the use of long-acting dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type B inhibition, or catechol-O-methyl-transferase inhibition in combination with levodopa. Dopamine agonists may reduce levodopa requirements. Monoamine oxidase type B inhibition can increase dopamine availability by preventing its metabolism. Similarly catechol-O-methyl-transferase inhibitors can increase the half-life of levodopa and the amount available to cross the blood-brain barrier by preventing its breakdown. The selection of a treatment for the management of ``wearing off'' should consider the relief of symptoms and also the potential adverse effects of adjunctive therapy.

Discontinuation of ropinirole and pramipexole in patients with Parkinson's disease: clinical practice versus clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare characteristics and incidence of discontinuation of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients starting ropinirole or pramipexole in clinical practice with data from randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Included in the retrospective clinical-practice cohort were first-time users of ropinirole or pramipexole diagnosed with PD before 2005. Baseline characteristics and incidence of discontinuation were compared between the clinical-practice cohort and RCTs. Treatment discontinuation was defined as more than 180 days between two refills of ropinirole or pramipexole. The incidence of discontinuation in RCTs was based on the reported rate of discontinuation for any cause.

RESULTS

Included were 45 patients who started with ropinirole and 59 patients who started with pramipexole. Treatment was discontinued within 3 years in 51% (ropinirole) and 60% (pramipexole) of the patients. Ten RCTs with ropinirole and 12 with pramipexole were identified. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the clinical-practice cohort and RCTs. RCTs reported discontinuation rates comparable with those at the same timepoint in the clinical practice until 1 year of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the overall incidence of discontinuation of ropinirole and pramipexole between the patients in our clinical-practice cohort and patients in the RCTs was comparable for the short term. However for the long term, discontinuation in practice is possibly higher.

Motor complications in Parkinson disease: Clinical manifestations and management

Long-term dopaminomimetic therapy, not limited to levodopa, is complicated by the emergence of variations of motor response in a majority of Parkinson disease (PD) patients. These variations can occur in different forms, as early wearing off during the initial stage of motor complications, dyskinesias in the intermediate stage, and complex fluctuations in the advanced stage. Considered to be a major source of disability in advanced PD patients, recognition of these complications is critical in order to develop different strategies designed not only to treat these problems when they develop, but also to prevent troublesome complications associated with potential risk factors. In this article, authors classify a wide clinical spectrum of motor complications into different stages as the disease progresses through the treatment. A number of strategies are proposed in order to manage these complications as well as to avoid them. Better understanding of these potential complications will result in better management of these problems and lessen the disability associated with advanced PD.

Review of the therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) and the Movement Disorder Society-European Section (MDS-ES). Part II: late (complicated) Parkinson's disease

To provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of late (complicated) Parkinson's disease (PD), based on a review of the literature. Complicated PD refers to patients suffering from the classical motor syndrome of PD along with other motor or non-motor complications, either disease-related (e.g. freezing) or treatment-related (e.g. dyskinesias or hallucinations). MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and INAHTA database literature searches were conducted. National guidelines were requested from all EFNS societies. Non-European guidelines were searched for using MEDLINE. Part II of the guidelines deals with treatment of motor and neuropsychiatric complications and autonomic disturbances. For each topic, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence. Following this, recommendations for management are given, alongside ratings of efficacy. Classifications of evidence and ratings of efficacy are made according to EFNS guidance. In cases where there is insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement ('good practice point') is made.

Advances in the delivery of treatments for Parkinson's disease

Innovative drug delivery in Parkinson's disease (PD) has the potential to reduce or avoid many side effects of current treatment, such as wearing-off type fluctuations, dyskinesia, on-off phenomena or bouts of motor freezing. The traditional orally administered formulations of l-dihydroxyphenylalanine combined with a peripheral aromatic acid decarboxylase inhibitor remain the mainstay of treatments for PD. However, such combination therapies have been further formulated to extend their duration of action by including a catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor. Preventing the breakdown of dopamine has also been achieved by monoamine oxidase-B inhibition; this approach now having been formulated for sublingual use (Zelapar, Valeant Pharmaceuticals). An alternative approach bypasses the oral route of administration and instead relies on continuous duodenal infusion (Duodopa, Solvay, NeoPharma AB) for better therapeutic effect. The clinical use of dopamine agonists as antiparkinsonian drugs now incorporates a variety of delivery techniques. For example, apomorphine, which relies on parenteral administration for maximum bioavailability, may be delivered via rectal, intranasal, sublingual and subcutaneous (e.g., Apokyn, Mylan Bertek) routes. Meanwhile, rotigotine and lisuride have both been formulated for delivery via skin patches. Finally, the authors examine more experimental delivery techniques, including the delivery of genes via viral vectors or liposomes, intracranial transplant of a variety of cells and of L-dihydroxyphenylalanine by prodrug-dispensing liposomes or pulmonary delivery (AIR, Alkermes). The advent and application of these varied technologies will help encourage patient-specific means of treatment for PD.

Rasagiline-associated motor improvement in PD occurs without worsening of cognitive and behavioral symptoms

BACKGROUND

Cognitive and behavioral adverse events (AEs) such as hallucinations, confusion, depression, somnolence and other sleep disorders commonly limit effective management of motor symptoms in PD. Rasagiline (N-propargyl-1(R)-aminoindan) mesylate is a novel, second-generation, selective, irreversible monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor, demonstrated in monotherapy and adjunctive trials to be effective for PD with excellent tolerability.

METHODS

The occurrence of cognitive and behavioral AEs and the change from baseline in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part I mental subscores were reviewed in two multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, 26-week trials of rasagiline for early and moderate-to-advanced patients with PD. The UPDRS is a multi-item rating scale specific to PD; part I rates the patient's intellectual impairment, thought disorders, depression and motivation/initiative.

RESULTS

The TEMPO study evaluated rasagiline monotherapy in early PD patients (n=404). The PRESTO study evaluated rasagiline as adjunctive therapy in moderate-to-advanced PD patients with motor complications who were receiving optimized levodopa/carbidopa (n=472). In the analysis of adverse event reporting for both studies, no cognitive and behavioral AE in either the rasagiline 1 mg or placebo groups exceeded 10% of the study population and the frequency differences between rasagiline 1 mg and placebo never exceeded 3%. There was no adverse effect on the UPDRS mental subscore relative to placebo in either of the two studies.

CONCLUSION

Rasagiline 1 mg once daily improves PD symptoms and motor fluctuations in early and moderate-to-advanced PD patients without causing significant cognitive and behavioral AE or adverse changes in mentation, behavior and mood.

Ropinirole therapy for Parkinson's disease

Ropinirole (Requip, GlaxoSmithKline) is a novel nonergoline dopamine D2 agonist indicated for the treatment of early and advanced Parkinson's disease. It is mainly metabolized by the liver and its elimination half-life is approximately 5.8 h. When used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease, ropinirole improves signs and symptoms of the disorder. When used as an adjunct to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations, ropinirole reduces off time and allows a reduction of levodopa dose. The initial use of ropinirole in early Parkinson's disease to which levodopa is added when necessary, has been demonstrated to lead to a lower incidence of dyskinesias compared with treatment with levodopa alone. An 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography study suggested the possibility that ropinirole could slow the progression of loss of dopamine neurons compared with treatment with levodopa but this remains to be proven. Side effects of ropinirole include nausea, somnolence, edema, orthostatic hypotension, hallucinations and dyskinesia. A once-daily formulation of ropinirole is currently in development that has the potential for greater convenience, improved tolerability and greater efficacy.

Ropinirole in the treatment of restless legs syndrome

Ropinirole is an original nonergoline dopamine agonist indicated for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. However, recent developments in the study of restless legs syndrome have demonstrated another role for this drug. The symptoms of restless legs syndrome are responsive to dopaminergic agents such as ropinirole. The dosage of ropinirole needed to treat the symptoms of restless legs syndrome appears to be much smaller than what is necessary for Parkinson's disease therapy. The liver is primarily responsible for the metabolism of ropinirole, which has an elimination half-life of approximately 6 h. Ropinirole is generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse effects. Clinical studies have indicated that ropinirole can effectively reduce the motor symptoms of restless legs syndrome and improve overall sleep quality.

Dopaminergic drugs may counteract behavioral and biochemical changes induced by models of brain injury

The dopaminergic drugs, bromocriptine, cabergoline, dihydroergocryptine, pergolide and ropinirole were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) at the dose of 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg/day for 7 days into male rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain. The drug pre-treatment reverted amnesia induced in rats by hypobaric hypopxia and tested in active and passive avoidance tasks. A restoration of memory retention, as assessed in a step-through passive avoidance task, was found in animals with a 2-month brain occlusive ischemia and exposed to dopaminergic drugs for 7 days. For behavioral effects in both active and passive avoidance tests in both experimental models, the rank of relative potency was ropirinole>bromocriptine=cabergoline>pergolide>dihydroergocryptine. Spontaneous ambulation of animals with brain occlusive ischemia was increased by the higher doses of drugs. All dopaminergic drugs reduced kainate mortality rate. The rank of relative potency for this effect was ropirinole=bromocriptine=cabergoline>pergolide=dihydroergocryptine. However, no change was found in other seizure parameters (latency to first convulsion and total number of convulsions) after drug treatment. A biochemical analysis of glutathione redox index (glutathione reduced/glutathione oxidized ratio) in discrete brain areas revealed that exposure to dopaminergic drugs increased this parameter in frontal cortex, striatum and hippocampus of animals subject to hypobaric hypoxia and brain occlusive ischemia. For this effect, the relative potency rank was ropirinole>bromocriptine=cabergoline>>pergolide=dihydroergocryptine. These behavioral and biochemical findings suggest that dopaminergic drugs may counteract either behavioral or biochemical changes induced by experimental models of brain injury. This activity was found after protective activity (as found in animals pre-treated with these drugs and exposed to hypobaric hypoxia) or reversal of brain injury (as found in animals treated after 2-month occlusive brain ischemia). Their neuroprotective activity probably involves the reduction/oxidation balance of the glutathione system in the brain.

Ropinirole, a non-ergoline dopamine agonist

Dopamine agonists have become indispensable in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. In every-day practice, however, the decision to select the best compound for an individual patient is rendered difficult because of the large number of substances available on the market. This review article provides a closer look at the experimental and clinical studies with ropinirole published so far. Ropinirole is a non-ergoline dopamine agonist which has been proven to be effective in both, monotherapy and combination therapy of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. In addition to ameliorating bradykinesia, rigor, and tremor, ropinirole facilitates the daily life and improves depressive moods of patients with Parkinson's disease. The long-term complications of levodopa are avoided, and problems commonly associated with levodopa treatment are reduced. Ropinirole appears to have a neuroprotective effect. In addition to Parkinson's disease, ropinirole has also been used successfully in the treatment of restless legs syndrome.

Ropinirole in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

In this review, the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, and clinical efficacy of ropinirole (Requip), a non-ergoline dopamine agonist approved for use in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) are examined. A summary of preclinical and clinical studies is presented. Ropinirole is safe and efficacious as monotherapy in the treatment of early PD and as an adjunct to levodopa in more advanced cases.

Role of COMT inhibitors and dopamine agonists in the treatment of motor fluctuations

Although levodopa remains the most effective drug for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), there are significant limitations to its chronic use. Growing preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that the severity of motor fluctuations is influenced both by PD severity and pulsatile stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors. Current management of motor fluctuations is based primarily on strategies to prolong the effects of dopaminergic stimulation. This prolongation is accomplished either through the use of long-acting dopaminergic drugs or prolonging of the effects of levodopa. During the past decade, the armamentarium of dopamine agonists increased and agents that prolong the plasma half-life of levodopa became available. Furthermore, recent clinical trials provide evidence-based approaches to improve the management of motor fluctuations in patients with advanced and early PD.

Comparing dopamine agonists in Parkinsonʼs disease

Dopamine agonists are effective in the management of both advanced and early-stage Parkinson's disease. Unfortunately, randomized head-to-head comparative studies between the many different dopamine agonists now available are sparse. Indirect comparisons of dopamine agonists show that ergot derivatives, such as pergolide and cabergoline, are as effective as non-ergot derivatives, such as ropinirole and pramipexole, in ameliorating Parkinson's disease symptoms in patients in early or advanced stages of the condition. As far as safety and tolerability are concerned, no significant differences between dopamine agonists are found. However, some specific adverse events, such as somnolence and sleep attacks, seem less frequent in monotherapy studies with pergolide than in those with the non-ergot dopamine agonists; however, because of the lack of direct-comparison studies this cannot be proved conclusively. Randomized, controlled comparative studies between dopamine agonists are necessary to verify any possible differences in their effectiveness and tolerability in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Comparison of the risk of adverse events with pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pramipexole and ropinirole are relatively new dopamine agonists, both of which have proven efficacy in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. There is, however, uncertainty regarding differences in the adverse event profiles associated with each drug.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the adverse events of pramipexole and ropinirole as reported in the peer-reviewed medical literature.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the medical literature to identify randomised controlled trials of pramipexole and ropinirole used in the management of Parkinson's disease. Computerised databases (including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts) were used to identify pertinent articles for inclusion in this study. Trials that compared the dopamine agonists to either levodopa or placebo were included.

ANALYSIS

Adverse events with these drugs included dizziness, nausea, hypotension, hallucinations, and somnolence. We made two separate analyses. In the first analysis, we estimated the pooled relative risk (RR) of adverse events with either pramipexole or ropinirole as compared with levodopa. In the second analysis, the pooled RRs of adverse events with pramipexole and ropinirole were compared with placebo. We used the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to estimate the RRs and their corresponding 95% CIs. We tested for study heterogeneity using Q statistics.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the risk of dizziness, nausea, or hypotension with either drug individually or in combination when compared with levodopa. The risk of hypotension was approximately four times higher with ropinirole than pramipexole when each drug was individually compared with placebo (6.46 [95% CI 1.47-28.28] for ropinirole, and 1.65 [0.88-3.08] for pramipexole). The pooled RR (for pramipexole and ropinirole combined) of hallucinations was 1.92 (95% CI 1.08-3.43) when compared with levodopa. Relative to placebo, pramipexole had a significantly higher risk of hallucinations than ropinirole (pramipexole 5.2 [95% CI 1.97-13.72] vs ropinirole 2.75 [95% CI 0.55-13.73]). There was no significant difference in the risk of somnolence between the two drugs when each was individually compared with levodopa. When compared with placebo, the pooled RR (pramipexole and ropinirole combined) of somnolence was 3.16 (95% CI 1.62-6.13). Relative to placebo, the risk of somnolence was 2.01 (95% CI 2.17-3.16) with pramipexole and 5.73 (95% CI 2.34-14.01) with ropinirole.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ropinirole seems to be associated with a higher risk of hypotension and somnolence than use of pramipexole when compared with placebo. Use of pramipexole seems to be associated with a higher risk of hallucinations than use of ropinirole when compared with placebo.

Treatment of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that demands a holistic approach to treatment. Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions play an important role in the comprehensive management of this disorder. While levodopa remains the single most effective medication for symptomatic treatment, dopamine agonists are playing an increasingly important role. Motor complications of dopaminergic therapy are a significant issue, particularly in patients with more advanced disease who have been on levodopa for several years. All therapeutic interventions must be tailored to the individual and modified as the disease progresses, with the goal of minimizing significant functional disability as much as possible.

Potential of transdermal drug delivery in Parkinson's disease

There has been a growing recognition that pulsatile stimulation of dopamine receptors may be an important mechanism in the generation of the motor fluctuations that often develop and compromise the effectiveness of long-term levodopa administration in persons with Parkinson's disease (PD). This has prompted investigation of treatment approaches that might provide more constant, and therefore physiological, dopamine receptor stimulation. Frequent levodopa administration, controlled-release levodopa preparations, inhibitors of levodopa metabolism, and duodenal, subcutaneous and even intravenous infusions of levodopa or dopamine agonists have all been employed with this goal in mind, but all have limitations. Transdermal drug delivery is a treatment approach that is not only capable of providing a constant rate of drug delivery, but is also non-invasive and relatively simple to use. However, developing a drug to be delivered transdermally for the treatment of PD has been anything but easy. Levodopa and many dopamine agonists are not sufficiently soluble to be administered via the transdermal route, and blind alleys have been encountered thus far in the investigation of suitably soluble drugs. Nevertheless, investigation continues and yet another candidate drug, rotigotine (N-0923), is currently under active investigation. Techniques designed to enhance skin permeation and thus improve the effectiveness of transdermal drug delivery are also potential sources for future treatment advances.

'Sleep attacks' or 'unintended sleep episodes' occur with dopamine agonists: is this a class effect?

Controversial reports of sudden onset 'sleep attacks' resulting in road traffic accidents have recently been reported in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) taking the non-ergot dopamine D(2 )/D(3) receptor agonists pramipexole and ropinirole. These reports have generated considerable debate as the concept of 'sleep attacks' is disputed amongst sleep specialists and most believe that isolated 'sleep attacks' not preceded by warning on the background of chronic sleepiness or 'unintended sleepiness' do not exist. A series of case reports suggested that this phenomenon may not be exclusive to the non-ergot dopamine agonists such as pramipexole or ropinirole and indeed may occur with most dopaminergic agents. Recent evidence suggest that a 'sleepiness' or 'hypoactivity' reaction to dopaminergic therapy may be related to underlying dopamine deficiency of PD rather than a drug effect. In this report we provide the evidence for the phenomenon being a class effect attributable to all dopamine agonists currently employed in the management of PD. Controversy surrounding excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in PD and the use of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in relation to PD is also discussed. In spite of variable reports, EDS is recognised to be common in PD and is likely to be related to both the disease process and drug therapy. Studies using multiple sleep latency tests have also reported differing results in PD although a recent study indicated that a subset of 'sleepy' patients with PD may experience pathological somnolence with resultant detrimental consequence on daytime and cognitive functions. We recommend that the issue of 'sleepiness' or 'sleep attacks' in PD should be routinely checked in all patients with PD and indirectly assessed by using either the ESS or the recently introduced Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale. Those with reported 'sleep attacks' or 'unintended sleep episodes' and excessive daytime sleepiness while taking dopamine agonists or dopaminergic agents such as levodopa should have a review of their medication, should not be driving a car on their own and some may merit formal sleep architecture studies. The latter may identify sleep disorders such as secondary narcolepsy which may benefit from the use of a wakefulness promoting agent.

Behavioral and neurochemical effects of dopaminergic drugs in models of brain injury

The dopaminergic drugs, ropinirole and dihydroergocryptine (DHECP) were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) at doses of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg/day for 7 days into male rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain. The drug pretreatment reverted amnesia induced in rats by hypobaric hypopxia and tested in active and passive avoidance tasks. Furthermore, a partial restoration of memory retention was found in animals with a 2-month brain occlusive ischemia induced by manipulation of the four major arteries of the brain. No major changes were found in spontaneous motor activity, but drug treatment increased ambulation of animals subjected to acute or chronic experimental manipulation. In a model of kainate-induced epilepsy, ropinirole or DHECP did not affect seizure parameters, but reduced mortality rate. At the end of behavioral procedures, in all animals subjected to hypobaric hypoxia or to brain occlusive ischemia glutathione redox index (glutathione reduced/glutathione oxidized ratio) was measured in the frontal cortex, striatum and hippocampus. It was found that experimental models of brain injury were followed by a decrease of reduced glutathione content in all brain areas. The glutathione redox index was augmented by ropinirole or DHECP treatment in all brain areas. These behavioral and neurochemical findings suggest that ropinirole and DHECP may exert either protective activity (as found in animals pretreated with these drugs and exposed to hypobaric hypoxia) or reversal of brain injury (as found in animals treated after two-month occlusive brain ischemia). Thus, both drugs may be studied as therapeutic agents in brain injuries of various origin.

Treatment interventions for Parkinson's disease: an evidence based assessment

We did a systematic review, with a uniform method of assessment of efficacy and safety, to assess the different interventions available for the management of Parkinson's disease (drugs, surgical interventions, and physical treatments) with respect to the following indications: prevention of disease progression, symptomatic treatment of motor features (parkinsonism), symptomatic control of motor complications, prevention of motor complications, and symptomatic treatment of non-motor features. Our aim was not to define practice guidelines, but rather to improve clinicians' knowledge of the presently available published clinical evidence, based mainly on randomised controlled trials. We hope that our review will help doctors to incorporate this background into their own decision-making strategy to make appropriate choices with respect to the treatment of individual patients with Parkinson's disease.

Increased risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Recent case reports and letters have alerted practitioners to the risk of sleep attacks, usually preceded by somnolence, in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with pramipexole and ropinirole.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists pramipexole and ropinirole in patients with Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and Cochrane Library, contacted experts and pharmaceutical manufacturers, and manually reviewed all references retrieved to identify possible articles to include. Information on randomisation, blinding, type of treatment and reporting of somnolence were abstracted by 2 independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by a third author.

ANALYSIS

We made 2 separate analyses. The first analysis compared the risk of somnolence in patients taking either pramipexole or ropinirole to that in patients taking placebo. The second analysis compared the risk of somnolence with these drugs (plus levodopa) versus that with levodopa alone. We calculated pooled relative risk estimates using the random effects model and when no heterogeneity was detected we used the fixed effects model.

RESULTS

Four trials were included in the analysis of patients taking pramipexole or ropinirole compared with those taking placebo. The pooled relative risk of somnolence in this analysis was 4.98 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.79 to 13.89]. Seven trials were included in the analysis of patients taking levodopa and pramipexole or ropinirole compared with those taking levodopa alone. The pooled relative risk was 2.06 (95% CI 1.47 to 2.88).

CONCLUSION

Patients with Parkinson's disease using pramipexole or ropinirole are at higher risk of experiencing somnolence relative to patients taking placebo. Patients taking levodopa plus either one of these dopamine agonists are at higher risk than those taking levodopa alone. Clinicians should carefully weigh this risk against the benefit of these agents when prescribing these drugs.

Choosing the right dopamine agonist for patients with Parkinson's disease

Dopamine receptor agonists (DA) are assuming an increasing importance in the treatment of both early and advanced symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, choosing the right DA for patients with PD unfortunately remains more a pragmatic medical art than a science. The aim of this review is to provide a realistic point of view on the strengths and weaknesses of five DAs: bromocriptine, ropinirole, pergolide, pramipexole and piribedil. This has been done by analysing their respective: (1) flexibility in PD, i.e. in monotherapy, in early and in late combination with levodopa; (2) safety profile and (3) titration schedule. These five DAs are not evenly matched regarding these three criteria. The differences observed highlight the therapeutic value of piribedil, which has a flexible indication, adapted to all stages of PD, a safer profile and the most simple initiation schedule.