Prospective study of sequential technetium-99m phosphate and gallium imaging in painful hip prostheses (comparison of diagnostic modalities)

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Total Hip Arthroplasty

This article reviews evidence for performing various imaging studies in patients with total hip prostheses. Routine follow-up is generally performed with radiography. Radiographs are also usually the initial imaging modality for patients with symptoms related to the prosthesis. Following acute injury with pain, noncontrast CT may add information to radiographic examination regarding the presence and location of a fracture, component stability, and bone stock. Image-guided joint aspiration, noncontrast MRI, and white blood cell scan and sulfur colloid scan of the hip, are usually appropriate studies for patients suspected of having periprosthetic infection. For evaluation of component loosening, wear, and/or osteolysis, noncontrast CT or MRI are usually appropriate studies. Noncontrast MRI is usually appropriate for identifying adverse reaction to metal debris related to metal-on-metal articulations. For assessing patients after hip arthroplasty, who have trochanteric pain and nondiagnostic radiographs, ultrasound, or MRI are usually appropriate studies. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Nuclear Medicine Scans in Total Joint Replacement

»

A 3-phase bone scan is a potential first-line nuclear medicine study for pain after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) when there is concern for periprosthetic joint infection or aseptic loosening.

»

In patients who have a positive bone scintigraphy result and suspected infection of the joint, but where aspiration or other studies are inconclusive, labeled leukocyte scintigraphy with bone marrow imaging may be of benefit.

»

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), while not a nuclear medicine study, also shows promise and has the advantage of providing information about the soft tissues around a total joint replacement.

»

Radiotracer uptake patterns in scintigraphy are affected by the prosthesis (total knee arthroplasty [TKA] versus total hip arthroplasty [THA]) and the use of cement.

»

Nuclear medicine scans may be ordered 1 year postoperatively but may have positive findings that are due to normal physiologic bone remodeling. Nuclear studies may be falsely positive for up to 2 years after TJA.

»

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with computed tomography (CT) (SPECT/CT), fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, and MRI show promise; however, more studies are needed to better define their role in the diagnostic workup of pain after TJA.

In Vitro Interaction of 5-Aminoorotic Acid and Its Gallium(III) Complex with Superoxide Radical, Generated by Two Model Systems

Increased levels of the superoxide radical are associated with oxidative damage to healthy tissues and with elimination of malignant cells in a living body. It is desirable that a chemotherapeutic combines pro-oxidant behavior around and inside tumors with antioxidant action near healthy cells. A complex consisting of a pro-oxidant cation and antioxidant ligands could be a potential anticancer agent. Ga(III) salts are known anticancer substances, and 5-aminoorotic acid (HAOA) is a ligand with antioxidant properties. The in vitro effects of HAOA and its complex with Ga(III) (gallium(III) 5-aminoorotate (GaAOA)) on the in vitro accumulation of superoxide and other free radicals were estimated. Model systems such as potassium superoxide (KO2), xanthine/xanthine oxidase (X/XO), and rat blood serum were utilized. Data suggested better antioxidant effect of GaAOA compared to HAOA. Evidently, all three ligands of GaAOA participated in the scavenging of superoxide. The effects in rat blood serum were more nuanced, considering the chemical and biochemical complexity of this model system. It was observed that the free-radical-scavenging action of both compounds investigated may be manifested via both hydrogen donation and electron transfer pathways. It was proposed that the radical-scavenging activities (RSAs) of HAOA and its complex with Ga(III) may be due to a complex process, depending on the concentration, and on the environment, nature, and size of the free radical. The electron transfer pathway was considered as more probable in comparison to hydrogen donation in the scavenging of superoxide by 5-aminoorotic acid and its gallium(III) complex.

Diagnosis and management of infected total knee arthroplasty

Infection following total knee arthroplasty can be difficult to diagnose and treat. Diagnosis is multifactorial and relies on the clinical picture, radiographs, bone scans, serologic tests, synovial fluid examination, intra-operative culture and histology. Newer techniques including ultrasonication and molecular diagnostic studies are playing an expanded role. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty with antibiotic cement and 4-6 weeks of intravenous antibiotic treatment remains the most successful intervention for infection eradication. There is no consensus on the optimum type of interval antibiotic cement spacer. There is a limited role for irrigation and debridement, direct one-stage exchange, chronic antibiotic suppression and salvage procedures like arthrodesis and amputation. We examine the literature on each of the diagnostic modalities and treatment options in brief and explain their current significance.

Nuclear medicine and the infected joint replacement

Nearly 700,000 hip and knee arthroplasties are performed annually in the United States. Although the results in most cases are excellent, implants do fail. Complications like heterotopic ossification, fracture, and dislocation are now relatively rare and easily diagnosed. Differentiating aseptic loosening, the most common cause of prosthetic joint failure, from infection, is important because their treatments are very different. Unfortunately, differentiating between these 2 entities can be challenging. Clinical signs of infection often are absent. Increased peripheral blood leukocytes, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein levels are neither sensitive nor specific for infection. Joint aspiration with Gram stain and culture is the definitive diagnostic test. Its specificity is in excess of 90%; its sensitivity is variable, however, ranging from 28% to 92%. Plain radiographs are neither sensitive nor specific and cross-sectional imaging modalities, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, can be limited by hardware-induced artifacts. Radionuclide imaging is not affected by orthopedic hardware and is the current imaging modality of choice for suspected joint replacement infection. Bone scintigraphy is sensitive for identifying the failed joint replacement, but cannot be used to determine the cause of failure. Neither periprosthetic uptake patterns nor performing the test as a 3-phase study significantly improve accuracy, which is only about 50-70%. Thus, bone scintigraphy typically is used as a screening test or in conjunction with other radionuclide studies. Combined bone gallium imaging, with an accuracy of 65-80%, offers only modest improvement over bone scintigraphy alone. Presently, combined leukocyte/marrow imaging, with approximately 90% accuracy, is the radionuclide imaging procedure of choice for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection. In vivo leukocyte labeling techniques have shown promise for diagnosing musculoskeletal infection; their role in prosthetic joint infection has not been established. (111)In-labeled polyclonal immunoglobulin lacks specificity. (99m)Tc-ciprofloaxicin does not consistently differentiate infection from aseptic inflammation. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography has been extensively investigated; its value in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is debatable.

White blood cell scintigraphy for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening: a retrospective study of 76 painful hip prostheses

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of an infected arthroplasty is often difficult. Fever, abnormal physical findings, radiographic changes, findings at bone scintigraphy, an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, and leucocytosis are not specific enough. We evaluated the diagnostic value of white blood cell scintigraphy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 76 cases (66 patients) admitted for white blood cell scintigraphy with a clinical suspicion of infection in a hip prosthesis during the period 1995-2003. The leukocytes were labeled with (99m)Tc-HMPAO or with (111)In-oxin. Anterior and posterior views were taken of both hip joints at 3 different time points after injection: 1 h, 3 h, and 22 h. Infection was verified by means of bacteriological cultures, histopathological findings, intraoperative frozen sections, and follow-up (up to 3.5 years).

RESULTS

Of 76 scintigraphies, 51 were negative and 25 were positive. There were 81% true positive, 94% true negative, 6% false positive, and 19% false negative outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

White blood cell scintigraphy with additional late imaging is an effective tool for differentiation between loosening and infection in painful hip arthroplasty.

The use of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of a loose acetabular component of a total hip prosthesis: a systematic review

This meta-analysis was performed to summarize and compare the diagnostic performance and diagnostic accuracy of radiographic and scintigraphic techniques in the evaluation of patients suspected of having aseptically loose acetabular components. Twenty-eight studies, published between January 1975 and October 2004, presented sufficient data for quantitative analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity rates for plain radiography were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 59%-79%) and 80% (95% CI = 73%-86%), respectively; those for subtraction arthrography were 89% (95% CI = 84%-93%) and 76% (95% CI = 68%-82%), respectively; and those for nuclear arthrography were 87% (95% CI = 57%-97%) and 64% (95% CI = 40%-82%), respectively. Finally, bone scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI = 57%-76%) and a specificity of 75% (95% CI = 64%-83%). We found a significantly higher sensitivity for subtraction arthrography as compared with plain radiography and bone scintigraphy. Therefore, subtraction arthrography is recommended for use as an additional diagnostic technique when plain radiography is found to be inconclusive.

MR Imaging of Hip Infection and Inflammation

With its superior anatomical resolution and high sensitivity in depicting pathological processes of the joint, bone marrow and surrounding soft tissue structures, MR imaging is the ideal modality for demonstrating the manifestations and sequelae of the infective and inflammatory conditions common to the hip. Though the imaging features of these conditions may overlap, combining the clinical history and results and other imaging modalities yields a higher degree of specificity, ultimately enhancing the confidence of the radiological interpretation.

The value of contrast and subtraction arthrography in the assessment of aseptic loosening of total hip prostheses: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast and subtraction arthrography in the assessment of aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasties.

DESIGN

This meta-analysis was performed using methods described by the Cochrane Methods Group on Systematic Reviews of Screening and Diagnostic Tests. We included original, English-language papers published between January 1975 to October 2004 that examined contrast-enhanced arthrography with or without subtraction for diagnosis of loosening of total hip prostheses. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed by two investigators.

RESULTS

With regard to the acetabular component, pooled sensitivity and specificity for contrast arthrography was 70% (95% confidence interval, 52-84) and 74% (95% CI, 53-87), respectively. Subtraction arthrography had a significantly higher sensitivity of 89% (95% CI, 84-93) (p=0.01), with a similar specificity of 76% (95% CI, 68-82). For the femoral component, pooled sensitivity and specificity for contrast arthrography were 63% (95% CI, 53-72) and 78% (95% CI, 68-86). Pooled estimates for subtraction arthrography revealed a significantly higher sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 74-93) (p=0.003). Specificity was 85% (95% CI, 77-91) and was similar to the data of contrast arthrography (p=0.23).

CONCLUSION

Using the present data we found that the subtraction arthrography is a sensitive technique for detection of loosening of total hip prostheses, offering added value over contrast arthrography, especially for evaluation of the femoral component.

Accuracy of diagnostic imaging techniques in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening of the femoral component of a hip prosthesis

In this meta-analysis we included 32 English-language articles published between January 1975 and June 2004 on the diagnostic performance of plain radiography, subtraction arthrography, nuclear arthrography and bone scintigraphy in detecting aseptic loosening of the femoral component, using criteria based on the Cochrane systematic review of screening and diagnostic tests.

The mean sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 76 to 87) and 81% (95% CI 73 to 87) for plain radiography and 85% (95% CI 75 to 91) and 83% (95% CI 75 to 89) for nuclear arthrography. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 86% (95% CI 74 to 93) and 85% (95% CI 77 to 91) for subtraction arthrography and 85% (95% CI 79 to 89) and 72% (95% CI 64 to 79) for bone scintigraphy. Although the diagnostic performance of the imaging techniques was not significantly different, plain radiography and bone scintigraphy are preferred for the assessment of a femoral component because of their efficacy and lower risk of patient morbidity.

Comparison of subtraction arthrography, radionuclide arthrography and conventional plain radiography to assess loosening of total knee arthroplasty / Vergleich von Subtraktionsarthrographie, Radionuklidarthrographie und konventionellem Röntgen zur Erfassung von Prothesenlockerungen in der Knierevisionschirurgie

The value of plain radiographs, digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide arthrography was analysed in 23 cases of failed total knee arthroplasty. The preoperative diagnosis was compared with the intraoperative assessment. Sensitivity, specificity and the positive and negative predictive value for assessing a loose component were determined separately for the femoral and tibial components. At revision we found 13 loose femoral and 12 loose tibial implants. In eight cases both components were unstable. Plain radiography had a sensitivity of 77% for loosening of the femoral and 83% for the tibial component; digital subtraction arthrography 77% for the femoral and 8% for the tibial component and radionuclide arthrography 31% and 8%. The specificity for plain radiography was 90% for the femoral and 72% for the tibial implant. For subtraction arthrography it was 50% and 82% and for subtraction arthrography 70% and 82%. Radiography had the highest positive and negative predictive values for both components compared with the other two techniques. As a diagnostic tool to detect implant loosening, plain radiography is the most effective in this study. Subtraction arthrography and radionuclide arthrography are not suitable for use as routine methods for detection of total knee arthroplasty loosening.

FDG PET for differentiation of infection and aseptic loosening in total hip replacements: comparison with conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with that of conventional radiography and three-phase bone scintigraphy in patients suspected of having infection in their total hip replacements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients with painful total hip replacements and possible septic prosthetic loosening were examined with FDG PET, conventional radiography, and three-phase bone scintigraphy. PET, radiographic, and scintigraphic images were each evaluated by two independent observers in a blinded fashion. For 32 of 35 patients, serial conventional radiographs were available. Results of microbiologic examinations of surgical specimens represented the standard of reference in 26 patients, and results of joint aspiration plus clinical follow-up of at least 6 months represented the standard of reference in the remaining nine patients. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver variability (kappa) values were calculated. The imaging modalities were compared in terms of diagnostic confidence by using the sign test.

RESULTS

Nine patients had septic and 21 patients had aseptic loosening. In five patients, neither loosening nor infection was confirmed. For diagnosing infection with FDG PET, conventional radiography, and bone scintigraphy, respectively, sensitivity values for reader 1 and reader 2 were 33% and 22%, 89% and 78%, and 56% and 44%, while specificity values were 81% and 85%, 50% and 65%, and 88% and 92% and accuracy values were 69% for both readers, 60% and 69%, and 80% for both readers. PET was significantly more specific (P =.035) but less sensitive (P =.016) than conventional radiography for the diagnosis of infection.

CONCLUSION

In a study population of patients suspected of having infected total hip replacements, FDG PET performed similarly to three-phase bone scintigraphy. FDG PET was more specific but less sensitive than conventional radiography for the diagnosis of infection.

The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide bone scan in revision hip arthroplasty

A prospective analysis of plain serial radigraphs (PSR), digital subtraction arthrography (DSA), and radionuclide bone scans (RBS) was performed in 56 cemented total hip arthroplasties to evaluate the efficacy and usefulness of each study in the diagnosis of loosening. To avoid selection bias in the evaluation of DSA and RBS, the decision to perform repeat surgery was based exclusively on the clinical history and PSR. Results of each study were compared with intraoperative assessment of the status of components and expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Overall accuracy for the acetabular component by PSR was 66%; by DSA, 93%; by RBS, 46%. Overall accuracy for the femoral component by PSR was 79%; by DSA, 93%; RBS, 50%. Our results indicate that DSA can be recommended as a further analysis in cases with a painful hip prosthesis and no or inconclusive findings on PSR. RBS did not give any useful information and cannot be recommended routinely.

Hip arthrography, aspiration, block, and bursography

Hip arthrography in children with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease is used to determine the optimal position of the femoral head for immobilization during the process of epiphyseal healing and in developmental dysplasia of the hip as a guide to operative treatment. In adult hips, arthrography and aspiration are useful techniques for demonstration of prosthetic implant loosening and infection. Aspiration of the hip joint and culture of aspirated fluid helps to diagnose septic arthritis. Anesthetic hip arthrography helps to distinguish between pain originating from the hip and radicular pain from the spine. Iliopsoas bursography may be used to diagnose bursal enlargement and its cause.

Quantitative bone scanning after asymptomatic Charnley arthroplasty

To establish the normal pattern of postoperative tracer uptake we performed 73 99mtechnetium methylene diphosphonate scans following primary Charnley hip replacements for arthrosis in 68 patients without clinical, hematological and radiographic complications. The patients were divided into 7 subgroups according to the period, 6-24 months, between surgery and scan. There were 10-12 patients in each subgroup. A high-resolution gamma camera with a large field of view was used. Ratios of uptake in each of 10 peri-prosthetic zones to normal bone were calculated. Femoral uptake was found to decrease in linear fashion from 6 to 12 months after surgery. Thereafter the uptake remained unaltered at levels nearly twice the normal ones in the greater trochanter and nearly 1.5 times in the lesser trochanter, returning to almost normal levels in other zones. Acetabular uptake remained elevated throughout.

Bone scan, gallium scan, and hip aspiration in the diagnosis of infected total hip arthroplasty

The difficulty in differentiating aseptic loosening from infection in painful total hip arthroplasty is well recognized. This prompted a review of the efficacy of the preoperative investigations used at the authors' institution. One hundred forty-four patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty were reviewed. Seventy-two had sequential bone-gallium scan, and/or hip aspiration, and intraoperative Gram stain. These were compared to intraoperative culture as the gold standard. Twenty infected hips were detected on culture. For prediction of infection, the bone-gallium scan had a sensitivity of 38% and a specificity of 100%. Hip aspiration had a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 97%. The investigations combined gave a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 95%. Intraoperative Gram stain compared with subsequent culture yielded a sensitivity of 23% and a specificity of 100%. Uncemented hips were infected more frequently (47%) than cemented hips (9%), significant at P < .0001. It was concluded that bone-gallium imaging is not an effective method for investigating painful hip prostheses for sepsis and offers no additional advantage over hip aspiration. Intraoperative Gram stain also missed a large number of infections. Other modalities, such as indium-labeled-leukocyte imaging and capsular histologic examination, may be more efficacious. A significant difference in the number of infections found in cemented versus uncemented hips was shown, hence greater vigilance for infection is required when patients present with painful uncemented hip arthroplasties.

The value of Tc-99m Nanocolloid scintigraphy in the evaluation of infected total hip arthroplasties

The early diagnosis of loosening is very important, since it provides a chance to protect the bone structure by means of a good postrevision outcome. Although the delayed stage of infected loosenings can easily be detected by clinical presentations, significant laboratory data and plain X-rays, diagnosis becomes a problem in the early stage. In this study the value of Tc-99m Nanocolloid (NCol) scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected loosenings was evaluated in 28 patients with painful total hip arthroplasty and 10 controls without any complaint after total hip arthroplasty, by comparing this method with laboratory data, plain X-rays and 3-phase Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) scintigraphy. Tc-99m NCol scintigraphy was found out to be a very valuable method with 100% sensitivity, 84% specificity in the diagnosis of infected prosthesis and it was superior to laboratory data, plain X-rays and 3-phase Tc-99m MDP scintigraphy, but requires to be evaluated in conjunction with plain X-rays for more information and in order to prevent false positive results.