Functional outcome of patients with femoral head fractures associated with hip dislocations

Techniques and results of reconstruction of femoral head fractures: An Update

A narrative review of the literature was conducted to examine the data on femoral head fractures, with a particular focus on their management, complications and clinical outcomes. A PRISMA strategy was used. Medline and Scopus library databases were queried using pre-defined MeSH terms and Boolean operators. Quality of evidence was evaluated based on OCEBM and GRADE systems. The 50 eligible articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria reported on 1403 femoral head fractures. A detailed analysis of the surgical approaches used was performed in 38 articles with 856 fractures. Most fractures were treated surgically (90,8 %) with preferred anatomical reconstruction in 76,7 % of all operatively treated cases. Posterior approaches were the most common (52.5 %). This was evenly split between surgical hip dislocation and the classic Kocher-Langenbeck approach. 70.5 % of surgically treated cases achieved excellent or good result according to Thompson-Epstein criteria. Highest rate of excellent results showed minimal invasive osteosynthesis and surgical hip dislocation. Major late complications were avascular necrosis (10.8 %), post-traumatic arthritis (16.2 %) and heterotopic ossification (20.8 %). Secondary THA was necessary in 6.9 %. Highest rate of major complications was joined with anterior approach (77 %), lowest rate from frequently used approaches surgical hip dislocation (37.8 %). Conservative treatment recedes into the background. The Ganz flip osteotomy with surgical hip dislocation allows safe treatment of all types of fractures and should be considered the first choice, offering the lowest rate of complications and one of the best functional outcomes. Reconstruction of Pipkin Type III fractures should be reserved for very young patients due to high rate of major complications.

Pipkin type III femoral head fracture: which treatment strategy can be recommended?

BACKGROUND

Pipkin type III femoral head fractures are relatively rare injuries. Few studies have explored and described the treatment and outcomes of Pipkin type III femoral head fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treating Pipkin type III femoral head fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients with Pipkin type III femoral head fractures who underwent ORIF from July 2010 and January 2018. The complications and reoperations were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Harris hip score (HHS), Thompson-Epstein criteria, and SF-12 score [including the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS)] were used for functional assessment.

RESULTS

Among the 12 patients, ten were males and two were females, with a mean age of 34.2 ± 11.9 years. The median follow-up time was 6 years (range 4-8 years). Five patients (42%) developed osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and one patient (8%) developed nonunion. These six patients (50%) underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). One patient (8%) developed heterotopic ossification and underwent ectopic bone excision; this patient also presented with post-traumatic arthritis. The mean final VAS pain score and HHS were 4.1 ± 3.1 points and 62.8 ± 24.4 points, respectively. According to the Thompson-Epstein criteria, there was one patient (8%) with excellent, four patients (33%) with good, one patient (8%) with fair, and six patients (50%) with poor outcomes. The PCS score and MCS score were 41.7 ± 34.7 points and 63.2 ± 14.5 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Limited by the high incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, it is difficult to achieve satisfactory functional outcomes when treating Pipkin type III femoral head fractures using ORIF, and a primary THA may be considered. However, for younger patients, considering the survivorship of prosthesis, ORIF may be recommended with the proviso that the patient is fully informed of the high complication rate associated with this procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Pipkin Type-II Femoral Head Fracture - A Biomechanical Evaluation by the Finite-Element Method

Objective  To evaluate the biomechanical capacity of two forms of fixation for Pipkin type-II fractures, describing the vertical fracture deviation, the maximum and minimum principal stresses, and the Von Mises equivalent stress in the syntheses used. Materials and Methods  Two internal fasteners were developed to treat Pipkin type-II fractures through finite elements: a 3.5-mm cortical screw and a Herbert screw. Under the same conditions, the vertical fracture deviation, the maximum and minimum principal stresses, and the Von Mises equivalent stress in the syntheses used were evaluated. Results  The vertical displacements evaluated were of 1.5 mm and 0.5 mm. The maximum principal stress values obtained in the upper region of the femoral neck were of 9.7 KPa and 1.3 Kpa, and the minimum principal stress values obtained in the lower region of the femoral neck were of -8.7 KPa and -9.3 KPa. Finally, the peak values for Von Mises stress were of 7.2 GPa and 2.0 GPa for the fixation models with the use of the 3.5-mm cortical screw and the Herbert screw respectively. Conclusion  The fixation system with the Herbert screw generated the best results in terms of reduction of vertical displacement, distribution of the maximum principal stress, and the peak Von Mises equivalent stress, demonstrating mechanical superiority compared to that of the 3.5-mm cortical screw in the treatment of Pipkin type-II fractures.

Management and outcome of patients with femoral head fractures: the mid-term follow-up with injuries and associated prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Femoral head fractures are rare injuries often associated with poor functional outcomes and complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, treatment methods and approaches, complications, and functional outcomes of femoral head fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 50 patients who sustained femoral head fractures between January 2011 and December 2018. There were thirty-seven (74%) males and thirteen (26%) females with a median age of 40 years. According to Pipkin's classification, there were eighteen (36%) Pipkin I, ten (20%) Pipkin II, eight (16%) Pipkin III, and fourteen (28%) Pipkin IV patients. Treatment methods were categorized into non-operative, operative by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and immediate total hip replacement (THR). The recorded surgical approach consists of an anterior(S-P) approach, posterior(K-L) approach, lateral stab, and combined anterior + lateral stab approach for fixation. The patients were also stratified by the Injury Severity Score (ISS), associated injuries, and, mechanism of injuries. The modified harris hip score (MHHS) was used to evaluate the ongoing complications with the clinical outcome of patients with two years or greater follow-up.

RESULTS

Eight (16%) patients were managed successfully with closed reduction without surgery and thirty-seven (74%) patients required operative reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the femoral head and acetabulum, and 5 (10%) patients required immediate THR. Six (12%) patients developed AVN, and four (8%) required a secondary THR. Sixteen patients (33%) developed post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), eight (16%) developed heterotopic ossification (HO) and six patients (12%) had sciatic nerve injury, none requiring operative treatment. Overall functional results according to MHHS were, excellent in two (4%) patients, good in sixteen (32%) patients, fair in twenty-two (44%) patients, and poor in ten (20%) patients. A statistically significant difference in outcome was observed among four pipkin subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Femoral head fractures are rare injuries often associated with poor outcomes. In this study, we report the functional outcomes and complications of all treatment approaches for femoral head fracture based on the Pipkin classification. The treatment aim should always be the anatomical reduction of the fragments. This study, adds to the growing literature on femoral head fracture and provides a reference for the clinical treatment to guide patient management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Our study was approved by the Clinical Research and Biomedical Ethical Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent to participate in this study.

Comparison of Postoperative Complications Between Trochanter Flip Osteotomy and Kocher-Langenbeck Approaches for the Treatment of Femoral Head Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose

The study aims to identify the optimal approach for femoral head fracture (FHF) by comparing the postoperative complications and outcome score of the Kocher-Langenbeck posterior approach (KLP) and trochanteric flip osteotomy (TFO) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published up to 22 January 2023, which compared TFO to the KLP for FHF treatment. The main outcomes of this meta-analysis were the rate of postoperative complications including osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), heterotopic ossification (HO), and total hip replacement (THR) conversion rate and Thompson-Epstein (T-E) score at the final follow-up.

Results

We included four studies with 57 cases of FHFs; 27 and 30 patients underwent TFO and the KLP, respectively. Following the pooled analysis, HO incidence was significantly higher in TFO than in the KLP (OR = 4.03; 95% CI 1.10-14.81; P = 0.04; I 2 = 0%), but there were no differences in other variables, including the incidence of ONFH (OR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.07-2.35; P = 0.32; I 2 = 0%), THR conversion rate (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.16-4.29; P = 0.81; I 2 = 0%), and number of inferior results in the T-E score (OR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.14-1.73; P = 0.27; I 2 = 0%).

Conclusions

Amongst the posterior approaches for FHFs, the KLP and TFO did not present significant clinical and radiological differences; hence, the approach can be selected depending on the surgeon's experience and preference.

Safe Surgical Dislocation and Open Reduction, Internal Fixation with Herbert Screw for Pipkin's Fracture Head of Femur in an Obese Patient: An Interesting Case Report

Head of femur fractures are relatively rare and tend to be associated with dislocations of the hip and fractures of the acetabulum. Other parts of the femur, namely the neck is also often involved. Only two cases per million are reported on a yearly basis which poses significance due to its extreme rarity. Here, we present a 30-year-old obese male patient with Pipkin's fracture who was treated successfully by us without any major complications.

Biomimetic materials based on zwitterionic polymers toward human-friendly medical devices

This review summarizes recent research on the design of polymer material systems based on biomimetic concepts and reports on the medical devices that implement these systems. Biomolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, and phospholipids, present in living organisms, play important roles in biological activities. These molecules are characterized by heterogenic nature with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity, and a balance of positive and negative charges, which provide unique reaction fields, interfaces, and functionality. Incorporating these molecules into artificial systems is expected to advance material science considerably. This approach to material design is exceptionally practical for medical devices that are in contact with living organisms. Here, it is focused on zwitterionic polymers with intramolecularly balanced charges and introduce examples of their applications in medical devices. Their unique properties make these polymers potential surface modification materials to enhance the performance and safety of conventional medical devices. This review discusses these devices; moreover, new surface technologies have been summarized for developing human-friendly medical devices using zwitterionic polymers in the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, orthopedic, and ophthalmology fields.

Repair of a Femoral Head Fracture Dislocation With an Associated Posterior Wall Acetabular Fracture (Pipkin 4) via a Kocher-Langenbeck Approach

A case of a 27-year-old man with a right-sided largely infra-foveal femoral head fracture dislocation with posterior wall acetabular fracture repaired via a Kocher-Langenbeck approach is presented. This is an atypical approach for fixation of the femoral head and acetabulum used because of the size and displacement of both the posterior wall fracture and the femoral head fracture. Indications for fixation of both the femoral head and the acetabulum include a displaced acetabular fracture with: (1) a fracture of the weight-bearing portion of the femoral head and/or (2) a fracture of the femoral head that engages the anterior or posterior wall. Overall, midterm outcomes are expected to be excellent to good if anatomic reduction and a concentrically stable hip joint is restored.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Fixation of a Femoral Head Fracture (Pipkin II): A Case Report

CASE

Fractures of the femoral head are infrequent injuries with potentially devastating complications. Pipkin type II fractures often require surgical fixation. It involves intraarticular approaches that may increase the inherent morbidity of these fractures. Hip arthroscopy minimizes surgical aggression and allows for direct control of fracture reduction. We present a case report of an arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous fixation of a Pipkin-II femoral head fracture. A hip arthroscopy without traction and percutaneous screw fixation was conducted under arthroscopic and fluoroscopic guidance.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous fixation is a useful technique for optimal femoral head fracture treatment and may also minimize surgical morbidity and optimize early recovery.

Surgical Approaches for Managing Femoral Head Fractures (FHFs); What and How to Choose from the Different Options?

Femoral head fractures (FHFs) are considered a relatively uncommon injury; however, they carry a challenge to the trauma surgeon. Choosing the appropriate management option, either conservatively or surgically, if the latter was chosen, should it be open reduction and internal fixation or simple excision of the fragment, or acute total hip arthroplasty. Furthermore, selecting the best surgical approach through which surgical management could be performed depends on the fracture classification, the familiarity of the surgeon, and the presence of associated injuries. All approaches to the hip, including hip arthroscopy, had been proposed for the management of FHFs; however, the difference among approaches is related to the complexity of the approach, the need for special training or equipment, the effect of the approach on the functional outcomes as well as the rate of postoperative complications. This review discussed the possible surgical approaches used to manage FHFs, advantages, and disadvantages for each, and offered a guideline for selecting the most appropriate surgical approach.

Efficacy of direct anterior approach combined with direct posterior approach in Pipkin IV femoral head fractures

Objective

The study aimed to explore the efficacy of direct anterior approach combined with direct posterior approach in Pipkin IV femoral head fractures.

Methods

The study enrolled 64 patients with Pipkin IV femoral head fractures who were treated at our hospital between March 2019 and April 2020. They were assigned to the control group and the study group using the random number table method with 32 patients in each group and received treatment by the direct anterior approach and treatment by the direct anterior approach combined with the direct posterior approach. The operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, postoperative drainage time, drainage volume, time to partial and full weight-bearing, total length of hospital stay and the levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) in the two groups were compared, and severity of pain and hip function at different time points postoperatively were observed, and the occurrences of complications were compared.

Results

There was no statistical difference in the operative time and intraoperative estimated blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, the study group had shorter postoperative drainage time, lower drainage volume, shorter time to partial and full weight-bearing, and shorter total length of hospital stay, and the difference was statistically different (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in Hb and Hct levels between the two groups before surgery (P > 0.05). The levels of Hb and Hct in both groups at postoperative day (POD) 1 were lower than those before surgery, and the levels of Hb and Hct in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the study group had significantly less severe pain at POD 1 and 7 and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the study group had significantly better hip function at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). All patients were followed up for 12 months, and 1 case of ectopic ossification appeared in both groups 3 months postoperatively, both Brooker grade I. No special treatment was provided as it did not interfere with the mobility of the hip and caused no apparent discomfort in the patients. In the current study, no incision infection, ischemic necrosis of the femoral head, breakage of the internal fixation device, fracture nonunion and loss of fracture reduction and other complications were reported in any patients.

Conclusion

Direct anterior approach combined with direct posterior approach in Pipkin IV femoral head fractures does not increase operative time and intraoperative estimated blood loss but can lessen severity of pain and promote functional recovery of the hip, leading to a favorable prognosis while not increasing the incidence of complications.

Which Surgical Approach Provides Maximum Visualization and Access for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Femoral Head Fractures?

OBJECTIVES

Femoral head fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) requires adequate surgical access and visualization. The purpose of this study was to objectively characterize femoral head access associated with commonly used surgical approaches. Our hypothesis was that a surgical hip dislocation (SHD) provides the greatest visualization and access to the femoral head.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric whole-pelvis specimens (n = 20 hips) were used to compare 4 surgical approaches to the femoral head (n = 5 hips per approach): SHD, Smith-Petersen (with and without rectus release), and Hueter. After surgical exposure, standardized and calibrated digital images were captured and analyzed to determine the percent-area visualized. Three independent investigators assessed each specimen to determine surgical visualization and access to the following femoral head anatomic quadrants: anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral. Data were analyzed for significant (P < 0.05) differences using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

The Hueter approach provided the lowest calculated % visualization. For surgeon visualization, SHD demonstrated a significantly (P < 0.001) higher proportion of visualized anatomic landmarks compared with all other approaches. SHD provided significantly (P < 0.049) more access to the femoral head quadrants compared with all other approaches. The Hueter approach had significantly (P = 0.004) lower surgeon access compared with the Smith-Petersen with release.

CONCLUSIONS

SHD provided superior visualization and access to clinically relevant femoral head anatomy compared with the Smith-Petersen with or without rectus release and Hueter approaches.

Does Surgical Repair Benefit Pipkin Type I Femoral Head Fractures?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Femoral head fractures are rare injuries with or without traumatic dislocations. The management of these fractures is crucial to prevent the development of severe complications and to achieve optimal functional outcomes. Wide treatment options for Pipkin 1 femoral head fractures range from fragment excision, fixation following open reduction with internal fixation, or conservative treatment such as close reduction alone after fracture dislocation. However, the best decision making remains controversial not only due to lack of large trials, but also inconsistent results reported. Therefore, we aim to compare the operative with nonoperative outcomes of Pipkin type 1 patients. Patients and Methods: We systemically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations to identify studies assessing outcomes of Pipkin type 1 patients after conservative treatment, and open reduction with excision or fixation. Data on comparison of clinical outcomes of each management were extracted including arthritis, heterotopic ossification (HO), avascular necrosis (AVN), and functional scores (Thompson Epstein, Merle' d Augine and Postel Score). We performed a meta-analysis with the available data. Results: Eight studies (7 case series and 1 RCT) were included in this study. In a pooled analysis, the overall rate of arthritis was 37% (95% CI, 2-79%), HO was 20% (95% CI, 2-45%), and AVN was 3% (95% CI, 0-16%). In comparison of management types, the excision group reached the best functional outcomes including Thompson Epstein Score (poor to worse, 9%; 95% CI, 0-27%) and Merle d' Aubigne and Postel Score (poor to worse, 18%; 95% CI, 3-38%); ORIF group had the highest AVN rate (11%; 95% CI, 0-92%); conservative treatment had the highest arthritis rate (67%; 95% CI: 0-100%) and lowest HO rate (2%; 95% CI, 0-28%). Discussion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that different procedures lead to various clinical outcomes: fragment excision may achieve better function, conservative treatment may result in a higher arthritis rate, while ORIFs may have a higher AVN rate. These findings may assist surgeons in tailoring their decision-making to specific patient profiles. Future RCTs with multicenter efforts are needed to validate associations found in this study. Level of Evidence: II, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fractures of the femoral head: a narrative review

Fractures of the femoral head are rare injuries, which typically occur after posterior hip dislocation.

The Pipkin classification, developed in 1957, is the most commonly used classification scheme to date.

The injury is mostly caused by high-energy trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents or falls from a significant height.

Emergency treatment consists of urgent closed reduction of the hip joint, followed by non-operative or operative treatment of the femoral head fracture and any associated injuries.

There is an ongoing controversy about the suitable surgical approach (anterior vs. posterior) for addressing fractures of the femoral head. Fracture location, degree of displacement, joint congruity and the presence of loose fragments, as well as concomitant injuries are crucial factors in choosing the adequate surgical approach.

Long-term complications such as osteonecrosis of the femoral head, posttraumatic osteoarthritis and heterotopic ossification can lead to a relatively poor functional outcome.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1122-1131. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210034

Gibson approach and surgical hip dislocation according to Ganz in the treatment of femoral head fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study is to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes in those patients with femoral head fracture, treated with open reduction and internal fixation through Gibson approach and Ganz flip trochanter osteotomy. The treatment of Pipkin fractures is very challenging, especially for small trauma centers, because of the unusual fracture patterns and high-level surgical skills required.

CASE PRESENTATION

Between 2017 and 2020, nine cases of Pipkin fractures came to the Emergency Department at the Trauma Center of our Hospital in Rome. Inclusion criteria were the diagnosis of femoral head fracture, the open reduction and internal fixation as surgical choice and at least 24 months follow-up. Patients older than 65 years and those treated through total hip replacement or combined hip procedure (CHP) were excluded. Thus, five patients were included in our case series. The clinical outcome was evaluated according to Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Vail Hip score, modified Harris Hip score and Merle D'Aubignè Postel score. Radiographic assessment was scored according to Epstein-Thompson classification and heterotopic ossification was assessed through Brooker classification. The mean follow-up was 24 months (range 12-24). Average modified Harris Hip score was 92.1 points (range 75.9-100), and the average Vail score was 81.8 (range 55-95). WOMAC score was assessed in three different subscales, pain (A), stiffness (B) and physical condition (C), with the following results: 1.4 A (range 0-7), 1.2 B (range 0-6) and 6.4 C (range 0-22). Merle d'Aubignè Postel score resulted excellent for four patients and good for one patient. According to Epstein-Thompson score of the radiological outcome, four patients showed a good result and one a fair result. No mechanical or infective complications occurred in the five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Gibson's approach and surgical hip dislocation through Ganz trochanteric flip osteotomy allow a good exposure of the femoral head and acetabulum, giving us the possibility to perform an anatomical reduction of the fracture. In our case series, satisfactory clinical and radiological short-term results were obtained without significant complications.

Management of femoral head fractures through surgical hip dislocation (SHD): a demanding but safe technique

INTRODUCTION

Femoral head fractures considered to be rare injuries. Surgical intervention is indicated for major fragment displacement or in the presence of instability. Surgical management can be achieved through either Anterior, posterior, and trans-trochanteric surgical approaches. Surgical hip dislocation (SHD) has been advocated by many authors to be a safe and effective alternative way of management. The aim of this study was to report on the accuracy of fracture reduction, procedure safety, and outcomes of using SHD in the management of femoral head fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2017, 31 patients presented with femoral head fracture were treated through SHD. At a mean follow-up of 48 months, 27 patients were available for the study with a mean age of 33.8 years. Patient demographics, clinical evaluation according to modified Harris hip score and modified Merle d'Aubigne and Postel score, radiographic fracture reduction according to Matta's criteria, and any complications were reported.

RESULTS

Excellent and good clinical outcomes were reported in 25 (92.6%) and 24 (89%) patients according to the modified Harris hip and modified Merle d'Aubigne and Postel scores, respectively. Anatomic fracture reduction was achieved in 21 (77.8%) patients. Two (7.4%) patients developed AVN, one (3.6%) patient developed hip OA (grade 3 according to Tönnis classification), and five (18.5%) patients developed asymptomatic Brooker stage I heterotopic ossification. No infection or trochanteric flip osteotomy fragment non-union was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

SHD offers a safe and efficient approach for femoral head fractures management with acceptable clinical outcomes as well as complication rates. Giving the advantage of fully exposing the femoral head and the acetabulum which enables the surgeon to anatomically reduce the fracture and treat any associated injuries, SHD is recommended besides other approaches for the management of femoral head fractures.

Safety and efficacy of surgical hip dislocation in managing femoral head fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Femoral head fractures (FHFs) are considered relatively uncommon injuries; however, open reduction and internal fixation is preferred for most displaced fractures. Several surgical approaches had been utilized with controversial results; surgical hip dislocation (SHD) is among these approaches, with the reputation of being demanding and leading to higher complication rates.

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of SHD in managing FHFs by reviewing the results reported in the literature.

METHODS

Major databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify studies reporting on outcomes of SHD utilized as an approach in treating FHFs. We extracted basic studies data, surgery-related data, functional outcomes, radiological outcomes, and postoperative complications. We calculated the mean differences for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals for each outcome and the odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals for binary outcomes. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved nine studies meeting our inclusion criteria, with a total of 129 FHFs. The results of our analysis revealed that the average operation time was 123.74 min, while the average blood loss was 491.89 mL. After an average follow-up of 38.4 mo, a satisfactory clinical outcome was achieved in 85% of patients, with 74% obtained anatomical fracture reduction. Overall complication rate ranged from 30% to 86%, with avascular necrosis, heterotopic ossification, and osteoarthritis being the most common complications occurring at an incidence of 12%, 25%, and 16%, respectively. Trochanteric flip osteotomy nonunion and trochanteric bursitis as a unique complication of SHD occurred at an incidence of 3.4% and 3.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The integration of SHD approach for dealing with FHFs offered acceptable functional and radiological outcomes with a wide range of safety in regards to the hip joint vascularity and the development of avascular necrosis, the formation of heterotopic ossification, and the development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis; however, it still carries its unique risk of trochanteric flip osteotomy nonunion and persistent lateral thigh pain.

Minimally invasive medial hip approach for femoral head fixation: How much can we see and what is the anatomical at risk? - A cadaveric injection study

INTRODUCTION

Most Pipkin I and II femoral head fractures are treated with either an anterior or a posterior approach. A medial hip approach is commonly used in children, and some surgeons have suggested it for femoral head fixation. The objectives of this study were to identify the structures at risk with the medial hip approach and to demonstrate the areas of the femoral head exposed using this approach.

METHODS

The first part of this study involved vascular injection conducted in four fresh human cadavers using the medial hip approach. The surgical technique was described and the structures at risk, mainly arteries, were identified. The second part was done in 14 hips to identify and measured the maximum exposure area of the femoral head with the medial hip approach.

RESULTS

The structures at risk with the medial hip approach were the medial femoral circumflex artery (MFCA) after it branches from the deep femoral artery and runs posteromedially across the femoral neck medial to the iliopsoas tendon and the deep branch of the MFCA lies over the posterior hip capsule. The femoral head exposure area in anterior view with anteroinferior articular cartilage exposure was 4.57 ± 1.09 cm². In the medial view with the hip in internal rotation and in external rotation, the inferomedial articular cartilage exposure was 2.50 ± 1.52 cm² and 6.48 ± 2.29 cm², respectively, and the combined area of exposure was 9.49 ± 2.86 cm² . In the posterior view, the posteroinferior articular exposure was 1.69 ± 1.16 cm². The medial hip approach allowed visualization of the small area of the posteroinferior articular cartilage in all specimens. The percentages of visualization of the femoral head articular cartilage in anterior view, medial view and posterior view were 50.07% ± 13.53, 45.56% ± 12.76 and 18.07% ± 11.27%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The structures at risk with the medial hip approach is the MFCA along the anterior acetabular rim and the deep branch on the posteromedial aspect of the femoral neck. It is an alternative which provides excellent access in Pipkin I and some part of Pipkin II, but it requires that the MFCA be protected by the use of meticulous surgical techniques.

A case report of femoral head fracture with osteochondral lesion treated by osteosynthesis and biomimetic scaffold: 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up

The aim of the present study was to present clinical and radiological outcome of a hip fracture-dislocation of the femoral head treated with biomimetic osteochondral scaffold.

An 18-year-old male was admitted to the hospital after a motorcycle-accident. He presented with an obturator hip dislocation with a type IVA femoral head fracture according to Brumback classification system. The patient underwent surgery 5 days after accident. The largest osteochondral fragment was reduced and stabilized with 2 screws, and the small fragments were removed. The residual osteochondral area was replaced by a biomimetic nanostructured osteochondral scaffold. At 1-year follow-up the patient did not complain of hip pain and could walk without limp. At 2-year follow-up he was able to run with no pain and he returned to practice sports. Repeated radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging studies of the hip showed no signs of osteoarthritis or evidence of avascular necrosis. A hyaline-like signal on the surface of the scaffold was observed with restoration of the articular surface and progressive decrease of the subchondral edema.

The results of the present study showed that the biomimetic nanostructured osteochondral scaffold could be a promising and safe option for the treatment of traumatic osteochondral lesions of the femoral head.

Study Design: Case report.

Complications and Functional Outcome of Femoral Head Fracture-Dislocation In Delayed and Neglected Cases

INTRODUCTION

Delayed reduction of the hip in femoral head fracture dislocation increases the risk of osteonecrosis and adversely affects the functional outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the outcome and complications of 138 patients with femoral head fracture dislocation treated by a single surgeon over a period of 22 years. Only seven patients presented within 24 h of injury and remaining all presented late. The hip joints could be reduced by closed manoeuvre in 105 patients, and 33 patients needed open reduction. The patients were managed conservatively or surgically. The mean follow-up period was 3.57 years (1-18 years).

RESULTS

There were 119 males and 19 females. The mean age was 35.71 years (range, 18-70 years). Forty-two patients were managed conservatively, and 96 patients needed surgical treatment. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was used in 40 patients, the trochanteric flip osteotomy in 14 patients, the Smith-Peterson approach in 31 patients, and the Watson-Jones approach in one patient. The femoral head fragment was fixed in 47.82% patients and excised in 11.59% patients. Primary total hip replacement (THR) was performed in 7.24% of patients through the posterior approach. 24.63% of patients developed complications with 14.49% of hip osteonecrosis, 2.89% posttraumatic osteoarthritis and 2.17% femoral head resorption. 55% of patients who developed osteonecrosis were operated through the posterior approach. Secondary procedures were needed in 14.48% of patients. The clinical outcome, as evaluated using the modified Harris Hip Score, was good to excellent in 52.89% of patients and poor to fair in 47.11% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The incidences of osteonecrosis and secondary procedures are increased in delayed and neglected femoral head fracture dislocation. Osteonecrosis is commonly seen in Brumback 2A injuries and posterior-based approaches. All Brumback 3B fractures in such delayed cases should be treated with THR. Osteosynthesis or conservative treatment should be reserved for other types of injuries. A careful selection of treatment plan in such delayed cases can result in a comparable functional outcome as reported in the literature.

Articular Femoral Head Fracture Management: A Meta-analysis of Literature

PURPOSE

Articular fractures of the proximal femur are seldom encountered and there are few studies in literature regarding this topic. To date, only a few large series have adequate follow-up and exhaustive description of treatment and outcome, which, however, often result incomplete and do not allow a comparison. Since there are still uncertainties and debates on which the treatment gold standard should be, the goal of the present study is to carry out a meta-analysis on type I and II Pipkin fracture management to establish the best treatment according to EBM.

METHODS

Studies regarding acetabular fractures of the femur head were identified from Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Medline, ScienceDirect and PubMed; gray studies were searched from the included references' literature, and using general search engines and Social media; the query to be temporally extended from 1996 to 2020. Only comparative studies were included; we ruled out case-reports, case series, author's opinion, register databases.

RESULTS

Comparing conservative and surgical treatment, we found evidence of a better outcome choosing surgical treatment. We found a significant better outcome with open reduction internal fixation, instead of fragment excision. Comparing failure rate of surgical approaches, we found no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Our study proves that there is evidence in favor of operative treatment rather than conservative in complete or displaced Pipkin fracture Type I + II; open reduction internal fixation should be preferred rather than fragment excision, whenever possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Therapeutic.

Treatment of Pipkin type I fracture using safe surgical hip dislocation: A case report

We report the clinical and radiological outcomes of a 30-year-old female with femoral head fracture following a posterior hip dislocation. The patient was managed using safe surgical hip dislocation. She had a pain free range of motion of the hip at 1 year postinjury.

Terrible triad of the hip: A case report

•

Pipkin-III injury is rare, and its outcome is guarded.

•

Significant number of Pipkin-III injuries are iatrogenic.

•

Recognizing irreducibility of hip dislocation is important.

•

Outcome can be improved with timely intervention.

•

Minimizing dissection might affect the outcome.

Introduction

Pipkin-III femoral head fracture dislocation is a rare injury and its outcome is guarded. Some authors believe femoral neck fracture of Pipkin-III injury is largely iatrogenic. Recent literature showed none of these injuries had excellent outcome, and most patients end up with hip replacement.

Presentation of case

A 34-year-old man sustained a traumatic hip injury with fracture-dislocation and an iatrogenic femoral neck fracture during reduction. A modified Gibson approach was performed to reduce and fix the femoral head and neck fractures in a retrograde fashion. Follow-up at 26 months assessment showed viable femoral head, and excellent functional outcome.

Discussion

Iatrogenic femoral neck fracture in the setting of femoral head dislocation is not uncommon. Clinical and radiological signs of irreducible dislocation can easily be missed which might lead to devastating complications like iatrogenic femoral neck fracture. Recognition of this unique injury, timely intervention, and meticulous dissection might positively alter the patient’s outcome.

Conclusion

This case serves to enlighten orthopedists about the risk of iatrogenic femoral neck fracture, methods to avoid such complication, and the proper management.

Irreducible Femur Head Fracture-Dislocation Treatment With Kocher-Langenbeck Approach With Flip Trochanteric Osteotomy: A Novel Approach

Femoral head fracture-dislocations are rare, and irreducible cases are even less frequent. Truly irreducible fracture-dislocations must be differentiated from incomplete reduction due to incarcerated bone or soft tissue interposition. The Pipkin classification is commonly used to classify femoral head fractures. An urgent reduction is required in traumatic hip dislocations to reduce the risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. However, in femoral head fractures, the dislocated hip cannot be reduced easily due to incarcerated bone or soft tissue. In an irreducible fracture hip dislocation, It is not advisable to attempt to reduce it repeatedly because sometimes femoral head fracture-dislocation is associated with the impacted fracture of the femoral neck. It may lead to iatrogenic femoral neck fracture. Hence, in such cases, immediate open reduction and internal fixation are recommended. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach can be used for reduction and safe surgical dislocation with flip trochanteric osteotomy for fixation as a novel approach.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Femoral Head Fractures with a Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical-reported and patient-reported outcomes of patients with femoral head fractures treated at a single level I trauma center with a minimum 10-year follow-up.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic Level-1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

One hundred one consecutive femoral head fractures were identified for this study. The final study group consisted of 28 patients with a minimum of 10 years of clinical follow-up.

INTERVENTION

All patients were treated with one or in combination with the following treatments: nonoperative management, open reduction and internal fixation, fragment excision, or total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at final follow-up along with clinical and radiological complications: infection, avascular necrosis, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, heterotopic ossification, and conversion to THA.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with greater than 10 years of follow-up were included in this evaluation. The average follow-up was 14 years, and the average age was 39.2 years. Surgical management occurred in 86% of patients, and the mean time to definitive treatment was 3.7 days. Overall, 21 patients (75%) experienced a complication. Seven patients (30%) were later converted to a THA at an average of 6.4 years from initial injury. Three of the 7 late THA conversions (43%) required later revision. OHSs were obtained in all 28 patients at the final follow-up. The average OHS was 36.6. The mean OHS of the native hips was 37 at an average follow-up of 13.6 years. The mean OHS of primary THA was 41, and the mean OHS of secondary THA at final follow-up was 31.4, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.134).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients should be counseled that the long-term results of open reduction and internal fixation may be satisfactory but unfortunately are not predictable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical treatment of femoral head fractures

Background

Femoral head fractures (FHF) are uncommon and generally caused by high-energy injuries. Surgical reduction with stable fixation of large fragments is believed to have the best outcomes. This retrospective study intended to report outcomes with surgical treatment at our institution and tried to establish treatment algorithm.

Methods

Through the 6-year period (2003–2008), 35 FHF in 35 consecutive patients (average, 30 years) were surgically treated. All FHF were caused by high-energy trauma. Patients' general condition was stabilized first and hip dislocation was manually reduced immediately. Definite fracture treatment was scheduled after admission for an average of 2.9 days (0.3–11 days). Pipkin classification was used as the treatment guide and open reduction with internal fixation was performed in all 35 FHF.

Results

These FHF included 21 type I, 7 type II, 3 type III, and 4 type IV fractures. The hip joint had been approached by either an anterior or posterior route depending on the individual surgeon. Internal fixation with screws was performed for all 35 FHF. The average admission was 13.8 days (range, 2–35 days). Thirty patients (86%, 30/35) were followed for an average of 3.3 years (at lease 6 months) and all 30 FHF healed. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head was found in 23% (7/30) patients and six patients were converted to hip arthroplasty for developing advanced stages of avascular necrosis. Heterotopic ossification occurred in 43% (13/30) patients. However, only one patient had range of motion limitation. Besides, one patient had moderate hip osteoarthritis.

Conclusions

FHF are uncommon and generally caused by high-energy injuries. Fracture healing can be attained in all femoral head fractures by using open reduction and screw fixation. Our results by using conventional approaches were associated with high complication rates. Further endeavor to improve the outcome should be taken.

Treatment of type IV Pipkin fracture in patients with a high BMI via hip arthroscopy-assisted surgery: a case report

Pipkin type IV femoral head (FH) fracture-dislocations are usually treated via open surgery. There are many surgical approaches for the treatment of this difficult fracture depending on the fracture pattern. Obesity presents another challenging problem in surgical treatment and sometimes leads to a poorer outcome. We discuss herein a patient of a high body mass index (BMI) with a Pipkin type IV FH fracture who underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of anacetabular fracture with reconstruction plates and hip arthroscopy-assisted fixation of the FH fracture with two Herbert screws via the posterior approach. The intra-articular osteochondral loose bodies were excised by hip arthroscopy simultaneously. The joint congruency and screw positions were checked during surgery by arthroscopy. After 6 months, clinical and computed tomography (CT) follow-ups showed excellent results. The patient of a high BMI recovered immediately and had a satisfactory short-term outcome after hip arthroscopy-assisted surgery. We concluded that hip arthroscopy-assisted surgery is a viable option for the treatment of Pipkin type IV FH fracture-dislocations.

Hip arthroscopy-assisted reduction and fixation for femoral head fracture dislocations: Clinical and radiographic short-term results of seven cases

PURPOSE

Femoral head fracture dislocations are serious articular fractures that are associated with soft tissue injuries and are challenging to treat. Arthroscopic surgery may be a way to treat fracture reduction and fixation, thereby avoiding the need for extensive arthrotomy.

METHODS

We followed up a consecutive series of seven patients with femoral head fracture dislocation via a scope-assisted percutaneous headless screw fixation between 2016 and 2017. The clinical and radiological results were assessed.

RESULTS

The locations of the fracture were all involving infra-foveal area. The mean follow-up duration was 18 (range 12-24) months. The mean Harris hip score was 90.8 (range 88-93) at the latest follow-up. None of the patients showed early osteoarthritis, heterotopic ossification, or avascular necrosis. The average maximal displacement of the fracture site was improved from preoperative 6.79 mm (range 4.21-12.32) to postoperative 2.76 mm (range 0.97-3.97). Concomitant intra-articular hip lesions secondary to traumatic hip dislocation can also be treated.

CONCLUSION

Managing the infra-foveal fracture of the femoral head using arthroscopic reduction and fixation with headless screws can be a safe and minimally invasive option. More patients and longer follow-up are needed for a definite conclusion.

Trochanteric osteotomy for safe surgical approach to bilateral hip dislocations with femoral head fractures

A 23-year old male with bilateral hip dislocations and associated femur head fractures (Pipkin type-II) presented with pain and flexion deformity of both hips after 9 days. After imaging, closed reduction was attempted but failed. Open reduction through Kocher-Langenbeck approach was performed and the femoral head fracture was accessed through Ganz's safe surgical dislocation. The fracture was reduced anatomically and fixed with headless Herbert screws. After two years, the patient was walking without pain or limp and there was no evidence of osteonecrosis. Simultaneous sequential Ganz's safe surgical dislocation can be performed in bilateral Pipkin's fracture dislocation with excellent short term outcome.

In Situ Reduction and Fixation of the Anterior Medial Fenestration Approach for Femoral Head Fracture

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and clinical application of the anterior medial fenestration approach in the treatment of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures.

Methods

The hips of two anti‐corrosion adult specimens treated with formalin were dissected and the anatomical structures and directional characteristics of the anterior medial main muscles, ligaments, blood vessels, and nerves were observed. The anterior medial fenestration approach was performed on bilateral hips of four fresh frozen specimens to determine the required pulling direction of the stripped muscles and ligaments during surgery. In addition, the vascular and nerve traction protection directions exposed in the approach were observed and analyzed. The feasibility of this approach was assessed, and the operative approach and critical anatomical depth were measured. We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients with Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures who underwent in situ reduction and fixation by anterior medial fenestration in our hospital from February 2016 to April 2018. The study group included 3 men and 9 women aged 37–59 years (mean, 48.50 years). There were 8 cases of Pipkin type I and 4 cases of Pipkin type II. The operation time, blood loss, fracture healing time, last Thompson–Epstein evaluation, and Harris score were recorded.

Results

A total of 8 fresh frozen specimens from 4 bilateral hips were exposed by anterior medial fenestration. The upper boundary of observation fenestration was the pubic body (anterior acetabulum), and the outer upper boundary was the iliacus and the psoas muscle. The lateral boundary was the rectus femoris and the femoral vessels, while the lower boundary was the transverse branch of the medial femoral circumflex artery and vein. The medial boundary was the pubis muscle, the short adductor muscle, and the long adductor muscle. The pubofemoral and iliofemoral ligaments were observed during fenestration. By cutting open the joint capsule and moving the hip joint, the four quadrants of the femoral head can be exposed. Twelve patients with femoral head fractures who were treated with anterior medial fenestration underwent in situ reduction and fixation. The operation time was 96.25–118.75 min (median, 100 min), and the blood loss was 115.00 ± 22.76 mL. The follow‐up time was 18.58 ± 4.48 months, and the fracture healing time was 144.17 ± 14.53 days. The last Thompson–Epstein evaluation was excellent in 6 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 2 cases; the excellent and good rate was 83.33%. Finally, the last Harris score was 85.08 ± 5.73 points.

Conclusions

The upper and lower boundaries, inner and outer boundaries, and rear anatomical structure of the anterior medial fenestration approach were defined. The movable hip joint can expose the four quadrants in front of the femoral head in this fenestration. Anterior medial fenestration in situ reduction and fixation surgery is feasible and safe for the treatment of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures.

3D printing-based Ganz approach for treatment of femoral head fractures: a prospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Femoral head fractures are uncommon injuries. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of femoral head fracture is the preferred treatment for most patients. There are several surgical approaches and treatments for this difficult fracture. However, the optimal surgical approach for the treatment of femoral head fracture remains controversial. Meanwhile, the operation is difficult and the complications are numerous. We prospectively reviewed patients with femoral head fractures managed surgically through the 3D printing-based Ganz approach to define a better approach with the least morbidity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2012 and 2017, a total of 17 patients were included in this study. An exact 1:1 3D printing model of the injured hip side was fabricated for each patient and simulated surgery was finished preoperative. The surgical approach was performed as described by Ganz. Functional assessment was performed using the modified Merle d'Aubigne scores. The reduction of the fracture was evaluated according to Matta's criteria. The incidence of complications, such as heterotopic ossification (HO) and avascular necrosis (AVN), and the need for additional surgery were also documented.

RESULTS

Twelve of 17 patients (four females and eight males) were available for 2 years follow-up. The mean follow-up was 35 months (25-48 months). Average age for the 12 patients was 39.9 ± 12.2 years. According to the Pipkin classification, four patients were type I fracture, three patients were type II fracture, and five patients were type IV fracture. The mean operative time was 124.2 ± 22.1 min, and the estimated blood loss was 437.5 ± 113.1 ml. According to Merle d' Aubigne scores, excellent results were achieved in six of the 12 patients; four good and two poor results occurred in the rest of the patients. On the radiograph evaluation, fracture reduction was defined as anatomical in eight patients, and imperfect in four. Most patients had good outcomes and satisfactory hip function at last follow-up. Almost all great trochanteric osteectomy healed uneventfully. One patient developed symptomatic AVN of the femoral head and underwent THA at 3 years. After THA, she regained a good hip function with the ability to return to work and almost no reduction in sports activities. Heterotopic ossification was found in four cases (type I-1, type II-2, and type III-1).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D printing-based Ganz approach provides a safe and reliable approach and satisfactory results of treatment in femoral head fractures. Using 3D printed model for the fracture of the femoral head, the fracture can be viewed in every direction to provide an accurate description of fracture characteristics, which contributes to make a reasonable surgical plan for patients. In addition, the 3D printing-based Ganz approach can obtain excellent surgical exposure and protection of the femoral head blood supply, reduce the operation time and intraoperative blood loss, make the precise osteotomy, anatomically fix the intra-articular fragments, and effectively reduce postoperative complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

We register our research at http://www.researchregistry.com . The Unique Identifying Number (UIN) from the Research Registry of the study is researchregistry4847 .

Management of Pipkin Fractures Using a Safe Surgical Hip Dislocation

Introduction

Pipkin fractures are rare events and usually occur as a consequence for high-energy trauma. Surgery to obtain anatomical reduction and fixation is the mainstay treatment for the majority of these injuries; nonetheless, controversy exists regarding the best surgical approach.

Description of the Case

We present the case of a 41-year-old male, which sustained a type II Pipkin fracture following a motorcycle accident. In the emergency department, an emergent closed reduction was performed, followed by surgery five days later. Using a surgical hip dislocation, a successful anatomical reduction and fixation was performed. After three years of follow-up, the patient presented with a normal range of motion, absent signs for avascular necrosis or posttraumatic arthritis, but with a grade II heterotopic ossification.

Discussion

Safe surgical hip dislocation allows full access to the femoral head and acetabulum, without increasing the risk for a femoral head avascular necrosis or posttraumatic arthritis. Simultaneously, this surgical approach gives the opportunity to repair associated acetabular or labral lesions, which explains the growing popularity with this technique.

Conclusion

Although technically demanding, safe surgical hip dislocation represents an excellent option in the reduction and fixation for Pipkin fractures.

Comparison of the modified Heuter approach and the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in the treatment of Pipkin type I and type II femoral head fractures

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the modified Heuter approach and the Kocher-Langenbeck approach in the treatment of Pipkin type I and II femoral head fractures.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 39 patients with Pipkin type I or type II femoral head fractures who were treated by open reduction and internal fixation through the modified Heuter approach (the Heuter group) or the Kocher-Langenbeck approach (the K-L group) between June 2013 and January 2016. Standard radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained before surgery and during the follow-up. The two approaches were compared in reference to operative time, amount of blood loss, the occurrence of complications, and final functional outcome. The Brooker classification was used to document heterotopic ossification and the Thompson-Epstein scores were used for final evaluation.

RESULTS

The mean operative time and estimated blood loss in the Heuter group were lower than those in the K-L group (P < 0.001 for both measures). The incisions healed primarily in all patients after surgery, no infection or deep venous thromboses were detected in either group, post-operative imaging data showed that dislocation and fractures were reduced, and the fractures finally achieved bony union. There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications or final functional outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the Kocher-Langenbeck approach, the modified Heuter approach can effectively reduce the blood loss and operative time without increasing the risk of complications; this approach is simple, straightforward, and atraumatic and may be a viable option for open reduction and internal fixation of Pipkin type I and type II femoral head fractures.

Case Report of a Rare Pipkin Type III Femoral Head Fracture

Introduction

Femoral head fractures are rare injury compared to other hip pathologies and often associated with posterior hip dislocation. Such fractures are often fraught with complications even after successful surgical fixation. Pipkin described a classification system for such fractures, dividing them into four types, of which Type III (31C.3) fractures are associated with femoral neck fractures. These fractures are the least common and often associated with the worst outcomes.

Case Report

We report a rare case of Pipkin Type III fracture after attempted hip relocation and review literature on this topic. A 35-year-old female sustained a right posterior hip dislocation with femoral head fracture following a fall. After attempts of manipulation and reduction, she sustained an iatrogenic right femoral neck fracture resulting in a Pipkin III femoral head fracture. Open reduction and reduction of fracture achieved through headless compression screw of femoral head and cortical screws of femoral neck. Four months after surgery, the patient under osteonecrosis of the femoral head and subsequently required conversion to a right total hip arthroplasty.

Conclusion

Femoral head fractures have serious sequelae and should be treated with caution. A high index of suspicion is required; hence, if clinically suspicious, proper imaging is paramount to prevent iatrogenic injury to the femoral neck resulting in subsequent avascular necrosis.

General principles for treatment of femoral head fractures

Femoral head fractures occur almost exclusively as a result of a traumatic hip dislocation. Treatment is typically an emergency and includes the reduction of the dislocated hip under anesthesia. As a rule, the earlier the reduction, the better the outcome. Open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture of the femoral head is the treatment of choice for most young patients. In some selected cases when there is a very small fragment located in the region below the fovea, removal should be indicated. In elderly patients and those who experience severe femoral head impaction, it is preferable to perform a total hip replacement. Despite optimal management, the rate of complications after femoral head fractures may reach as high as 50%. In the present study, the authors review the general principles of management of patients with femoral head fractures.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Femoral Head Fractures Associated with Traumatic Hip Dislocations

Background

Femoral head fractures are an uncommon but severe injury. These high-energy injuries typically occur in association with traumatic hip dislocations. Initial treatment includes urgent concentric reduction; however, controversy exists regarding specific fracture management. The well-known complications of avascular necrosis (AVN), posttraumatic arthritis (PTA), and heterotrophic ossification can leave patients with a significant functional loss of their affected hip. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of femoral head fractures.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed at our institution assessing all patients who presented from 2007 to 2015 with a femoral head fracture associated with a hip dislocation and at least 6 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up. Twenty-two patients met our inclusion criteria. There were 15 males and 7 females with an average age of 36 years (range: 17-55). The average follow-up time was 18 months (range: 6-102). Fractures were classified according to the Pipkin classification. The Thompson and Epstein score was used to determine functional outcomes.

Results

There were five, Pipkin I, 3 Pipkin II, 0 Pipkin III, and 14 Pipkin IV, femoral head fractures. Sixteen patients were successfully closed reduced in the emergency department (ED) and six patients required open reduction after failed reduction in the ED. Four patients (18%) were successfully treated with closed reduction alone and 18 patients (82%) required operative intervention. Of those undergoing operative intervention, one patient underwent excision of the femoral head fragment, seven underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the femoral head, nine underwent ORIF of the acetabulum, and one underwent ORIF of the femoral head and the acetabulum. Nine patients (41%) had an uneventful postoperative course. Two patients (9%) developed AVN, both requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA). Five patients (23%) developed PTA, two eventually requiring a THA. Two patients (9%) had sciatic nerve palsy. One patient (5%) developed a postoperative infection and four patients (18%) developed heterotrophic ossification (HO), none requiring operative treatment. Two patients (9%) had persistent anterolateral (AL) thigh numbness. Overall functional results were excellent in six patients (27%), good in six (27%), fair in seven (32%), and poor in three patients (14%). Four patients (18%) required a THA.

Conclusion

Femoral head fractures are a rare injury with well-known complications. Early diagnosis and concentric reduction are the prerequisites for successful treatment. This study adds to the growing literature on femoral head fractures associated with hip dislocations in efforts to define treatment plans and to guide patient expectations.

How to cite this article

Del Core MA, Gross B, Ahn J, et al. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Femoral Head Fractures Associated with Traumatic Hip Dislocations. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019;14(1):6-10.

A case of posterior HIP dislocation with intertrochanteric fracture: Beware of the sharp calcar spike

Posterior dislocation of hip is commonly associated with acetabular lip fractures. Involvement of neck, trochanter or intertrochanteric region is uncommon. Very few cases of posterior hip dislocation with ipsilateral intertrochanteric fracture in the absence of head or acetabular fracture have been reported in the literature. We report such a case in a 19yr male treated with open reduction and internal fixation with sliding hip screw with good functional and radiological outcome at 1 year. Being an extremely rare form of injury, such an injury pattern does not exist in present classification systems. There is a need to revise the existing classification systems and formulate a protocol for the management of the same. Such fractures may also be associated with a sharp calcar spike of the proximal fragment impinging femoral vessels and branches. Attempt at closed reduction without adequate anatomical orientation of the spike can lead to hazardous vascular consequences.

[Modified Hueter direct anterior approach for treatment of Pipkin type and femoral head fractures]

Objective

To discuss the effectiveness of the modified Hueter direct anterior approach in treatment of Pipkin typeⅠ and Ⅱ femoral head fractures.

Methods

Between September 2014 and May 2016, 12 patients with Pipkin type Ⅰ and Ⅱ femoral head fractures were treated with the modified Hueter direct anterior approach. There were 8 males and 4 females, aged from 32 to 60 years (mean, 40.2 years). The disease causes included traffic accident injury in 9 cases and falling from height injury in 3 cases. According to Pipkin typing, 8 cases were rated as type Ⅰ and 4 cases as type Ⅱ. The interval of injury and admission was 2-28 hours (mean, 7.2 hours). Reduction was performed in all patients within 6 hours after admission, and then bone traction was given. The operation was performed in 3-7 days (mean, 4.3 days) after redution. The modified Hueter direct anterior approach was applied to expose and fix femoral head fractures by Herbert screws compressively. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded, and the effectiveness was evaluated according to the Thompson-Epstein scale at last follow-up.

Results

The operation time was 80-130 minutes (mean, 97.5 minutes), and the intraoperative blood loss was 100-200 mL (mean, 130.2 mL). All fractures achieved anatomical reduction and successful fixation. All 12 patients were followed up 12-32 months (mean, 24.3 months). All patients achieved bone union in 15-20 weeks (mean, 16.3 weeks) and no wound infection, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, or heterotopic ossification occurred. Traumatic arthritis occured in 3 patients. According to the Thompson-Epstein scale at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 2 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 83.3%.

Conclusion

The modified Hueter direct anterior approach has the advantages of clear anatomic structure, less trauma, and shorter operation time, and it can effectively expose and fix the Pipkin typeⅠ and Ⅱ femoral head fractures.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of the Femoral Head via the Smith-Petersen Approach

Pipkin described femoral head fractures in the 1950s, but controversy still exists regarding indications for surgery and approaches for operative treatment of femoral head fractures. Clear indications for operative intervention include inability to reduce the hip with closed methods, a nonconcentric reduction, fracture fragments within the articulating surface of the hip, and associated injuries (acetabulum and femoral neck fractures) with their own indications for surgery. The anterior approach described by Smith-Petersen has been modified (using only the distal portion) and used to visualize, clean, reduce, and fix these fractures with and without anterior dislocation of the hip.

Does the Watson-Jones or Modified Smith-Petersen Approach Provide Superior Exposure for Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation?

BACKGROUND

A well-reduced femoral neck fracture is more likely to heal than a poorly reduced one, and increasing the quality of the surgical exposure makes it easier to achieve anatomic fracture reduction. Two open approaches are in common use for femoral neck fractures, the modified Smith-Petersen and Watson-Jones; however, to our knowledge, the quality of exposure of the femoral neck exposure provided by each approach has not been investigated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the respective area of exposed femoral neck afforded by the Watson-Jones and modified Smith-Petersen approaches? (2) Is there a difference in the ability to visualize and/or palpate important anatomic landmarks provided by the Watson-Jones and modified Smith-Petersen approaches?

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen human pelvi underwent both modified Smith-Petersen (utilizing the caudal extent of the standard Smith-Petersen interval distal to the anterosuperior iliac spine and parallel to the palpable interval between the tensor fascia lata and the sartorius) and Watson-Jones approaches. Dissections were performed by three fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists with extensive experience in both approaches. Exposure (in cm) was quantified with calibrated digital photographs and specialized software. Modified Smith-Petersen approaches were analyzed before and after rectus femoris tenotomy. The ability to visualize and palpate seven clinically relevant anatomic structures (the labrum, femoral head, subcapital femoral neck, basicervical femoral neck, greater trochanter, lesser trochanter, and medial femoral neck) was also recorded. The quantified area of the exposed proximal femur was utilized to compare which approach afforded the largest field of view of the femoral neck and articular surface for assessment of femoral neck fracture and associated femoral head injury. The ability to visualize and palpate surrounding structures was assessed so that we could better understand which approach afforded the ability to assess structures that are relevant to femoral neck fracture reduction and fixation.

RESULTS

After controlling for age, body mass index, height, and sex, we found the modified Smith-Petersen approach provided a mean of 2.36 cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-4.28 cm; p = 0.015) additional exposure without rectus femoris tenotomy (p = 0.015) and 3.33 cm (95% CI, 1.42-5.24 cm; p = 0.001) additional exposure with a tenotomy compared with the Watson-Jones approach. The labrum, femoral head, subcapital femoral neck, basicervical femoral neck, and greater trochanter were reliably visible and palpable in both approaches. The lesser trochanter was palpable in all of the modified Smith-Petersen and none of the Watson-Jones approaches (p < 0.001). All modified Smith-Petersen approaches (10 of 10) provided visualization and palpation of the medial femoral neck, whereas visualization of the medial femoral neck was only possible in one of 10 Watson-Jones approaches (p < 0.001) and palpation was possible in eight of 10 Watson-Jones versus all 10 modified Smith-Petersen approaches (p = 0.470).

CONCLUSIONS

In the hands of surgeons experienced with both surgical approaches to the femoral neck, the modified Smith-Petersen approach, with or without rectus femoris tenotomy, provides superior exposure of the femoral neck and articular surface as well as visualization and palpation of clinically relevant proximal femoral anatomic landmarks compared with the Watson-Jones approach.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Open reduction and internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture is typically performed in a young patient (< 60 years old) with the objective of obtaining anatomic reduction that would not be possible by closed manipulation, thus enhancing healing potential. In the hands of surgeons experienced in both approaches, the modified Smith-Petersen approach offers improved direct access for reduction and fixation. Higher quality reductions and fixation are expected to translate to improved healing potential and outcomes. Although our experimental results are promising, further clinical studies are needed to verify if this larger exposure area imparts increased quality of reduction, healing, and improved outcomes compared with other approaches. The learning curve for the exposure is unclear, but the approach has broad applications and is frequently used in other subspecialties such as for direct anterior THA and pediatric septic hip drainage. Surgeons treating femoral neck fractures with open reduction and fixation should familiarize themselves with the modified Smith-Petersen approach.

Middle-term follow-up results of Pipkin type IV femoral head fracture patients treated by reconstruction plate and bioabsorbable screws

PURPOSE

To investigate the mid-term curative effects of the treatment of Pipkin type IV femoral head fractures using a reconstruction plate and bioabsorbable screws and provide the evidence for clinical practice.

METHODS

From February 2010 to September 2014, 21 patients with Pipkin type IV femoral head fractures were treated surgically. There were 13 males and 8 females with an average age of 41.1 years (range, 20-65 years). The causes of the fractures included traffic accidents (13 cases), falls from a height (four cases), heavy lifting injuries (three cases), and sport injury (one case). All patients were followed up with radiography and three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography and other checks and any complications were actively managed. Closed reduction of fracture-dislocation of the hip was attempted under general anesthesia using the Kocher-Langenbeck approach. Femoral head fractures were treated with internal fixation or excision based on the size of the fracture fragments, whereas acetabular fractures were fixed with a reconstruction plate and screws following anatomic reduction.

RESULTS

The incisions healed by primary intention in all patients after surgery, without any infection, deep venous thrombosis, or other complications. All 21 patients were followed up for 36-76 months, with an average follow-up duration of 49 months. Postoperative imaging data showed that all dislocations and fractures were anatomically reduced, and bony union of the fractures was achieved. Heterotopic ossification was found in four patients, post-traumatic osteoarthritis in three, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head in two. At the final follow-up, the assessment of hip joint function according to the Thompson-Epstein scoring scale was excellent in 10 cases, good in six cases, fair in three cases, and poor in two cases. The rate of excellent and good functional outcomes was 76.1%.

CONCLUSION

The mid-term curative effects of a reconstruction plate and bioabsorbable screws in the treatment of Pipkin type IV femoral head fractures is significant, and such the treatment can significantly improve the patient's joint function and quality of life.

Articular Incongruity in the Lower Extremity: How Much Is Too Much?

Intraarticular fractures carry a significant risk for posttraumatic osteoarthritis, and this risk varies across different joint surfaces of the lower extremity. These differences are likely due to the anatomic and biomechanical specifics of each joint surface. High-quality human studies are lacking to delineate the threshold articular incongruity that significantly increases risk for posttraumatic osteoarthritis and diminished clinical outcomes for many joint surfaces. Even with anatomic reduction of the articular surface, close attention must be paid to mechanical axis and joint stability to optimize outcomes.

Midterm results of trochanteric flip osteotomy technique for management of fractures around the hip

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we aimed to investigate safety and efficacy of the trochanteric flip osteotomy with surgical hip dislocation technique in selected displaced acetabular and femoral head fractures with clinico-radiological outcome and potential complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients from January 2009 to June 2014. Selected displaced acetabular fractures with comminution and/or cranial extension of posterior wall, marginal impaction, intraarticular fragment, femoral head fractures and hip fracture-dislocations were operated by this modified approach of trochanteric flip osteotomy and surgical hip dislocation. Patients were evaluated for fracture reduction, femoral head viability, trochanteric union, abduction power, and functional evaluation was done by Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scoring system. Minimum follow-up was 24 months.

RESULTS

Reduction was judged to be anatomical in 84.38% of cases, and within 1-3 millimetres in 9.38% of cases. All osteotomies healed in an anatomical position. Heterotopic ossification was found in 2 patients limited to Brooker class I. Osteonecrosis developed in 1 patient. 2 patients developed arthritis of the hip as sequelae of poor reduction. Abduction power was MRC 5/5 in all except in 1 patient (4/5). Mean Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score was 16.18; overall good to excellent result was achieved in 87.5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Trochanteric flip osteotomy with surgical dislocation allows better intraarticular assessment, control of intraarticular fragments, assists accurate reduction and the fixation of complex acetabular and femoral head fractures, without compromising femoral head vascularity and abductor strength. This technique has provided excellent midterm results in the management of complex injuries around the hip.

Pipkin type III femoral head fracture-dislocation combined with complicated acetabular fracture: A rare case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Pipkin III fracture, which is characterized by high risk of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, is extremely rare. It is more difficult to treat and has a worse prognosis when accompanied with severe acetabular fractures. Few studies show that both Pipkin type III femoral head fracture-dislocation and complicated acetabular fracture presented in one patient.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 34-year-old male suffered a terrible traffic accident with a serious damage to the left side when he was sitting in the car's cockpit. Pelvic radiograph and 3-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography revealed characteristics of fractures before the emergency operation.

DIAGNOSIS

Pipkin III fractures combined with complicated acetabular fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

Firstly, we used combined anterior and posterior approach for treatment to fix the femoral head fractures. Then, we completed anatomical reduction of fractures with countersunk head screw, hollow screw, and reconstruction plate.

OUTCOMES

At the 12-months follow-up, the patient could walk freely and perform activities of daily living without necrosis of femoral head and heterotopic ossification.

LESSONS

Although there are serious complications in Pipkin III fractures combined with complicated acetabular fracture, early surgical treatment with appropriate approach and fixation could get satisfactory results.

Management and radiographic outcomes of femoral head fractures

Background

Femoral head fractures are uncommon injuries. Small series constitute the majority of the available literature. Surgical approach and fracture management is variable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, method of treatment, and outcomes of consecutive femoral head fractures at a regional academic Level I trauma center.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed over a 13-year period. All AO/OTA 31C femoral head fractures were identified. A surgical approach and fixation method was recorded. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed for patients with 6 months or greater follow-up. Radiographs were evaluated for fixation failure, heterotopic ossification (HO), avascular necrosis (AVN) and post-traumatic arthritis.

Results

We identified 164 fractures in 163 patients; 147 fractures were available for review. Treatment was operative reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 78 (53.1%), fragment excision in 37 (25.1%) and non-operative in 28 (19%). An anterior approach and mini-fragment screws were used in the majority of patients treated with fixation. Sixty-nine fractures had follow-up greater than 6 months. Sixty-two fractures (89.9%) proceeded to uneventful union. All Pipkin III fractures failed operative fixation. Six patients developed AVN, seven patients had a known conversion to hip arthroplasty; HO developed in 28 (40.6%) patients and rarely required excision.

Conclusions

Fractures of the femoral head are rare. An anterior approach can be used for fragment excision or fixation using mini-fragment screws. Pipkin III fractures represent catastrophic injuries. Non-bridging, asymptomatic HO is common. AVN and posttraumatic degenerative disease of the hip occur but are uncommon.

Level of evidence

IV—prognostic.

Arthroscopic Reduction and Internal Fixation for Pipkin Type I Femoral Head Fracture: Technical Note

Femoral head fractures after posterior dislocation of the hip are uncommon and are conventionally treated by an open method. Hip arthroscopy can be a valuable treatment option for the management of femoral head fractures. Arthroscopy allows for a less invasive option when compared with arthrotomy and can allow faster recovery with minimal soft-tissue injury. We describe the arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation of Pipkin type I femoral head fractures with a detailed stepwise description of the surgical technique, including technical pearls and pitfalls, potential complications, and advantages and disadvantages.

Fixation of a fractured femoral head through a medial hip approach: an original approach to the femoral head

The decision to treat a femoral head fracture conservatively or surgically is the subject of ongoing debate. Several surgical approaches have been proposed for the open reduction and internal fixation of femoral head fractures. To our knowledge, fixation through a minimally invasive medial approach has not been described until now. The novel medial hip approach passes between the adductor muscle bellies posteriorly and their aponeuroses anteriorly. It provides direct access to the fracture site and allows for fixation by compression, without needing to dislocate the hip or detach the muscles. Any loose bodies in the joint that cannot be fixed can also be removed during the procedure. These features make the medial hip approach a clinically-relevant treatment option for the surgical management of femoral head fractures.