P-glycoprotein as a prognostic indicator in pre- and postchemotherapy ovarian adenocarcinoma

The roles of the human ATP-binding cassette transporters P-glycoprotein and ABCG2 in multidrug resistance in cancer and at endogenous sites: future opportunities for structure-based drug design of inhibitors

The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and ABCG2 are multidrug transporters that confer drug resistance to numerous anti-cancer therapeutics in cell culture. These findings initially created great excitement in the medical oncology community, as inhibitors of these transporters held the promise of overcoming clinical multidrug resistance in cancer patients. However, clinical trials of P-gp and ABCG2 inhibitors in combination with cancer chemotherapeutics have not been successful due, in part, to flawed clinical trial designs resulting from an incomplete molecular understanding of the multifactorial basis of multidrug resistance (MDR) in the cancers examined. The field was also stymied by the lack of high-resolution structural information for P-gp and ABCG2 for use in the rational structure-based drug design of inhibitors. Recent advances in structural biology have led to numerous structures of both ABCG2 and P-gp that elucidated more clearly the mechanism of transport and the polyspecific nature of their substrate and inhibitor binding sites. These data should prove useful helpful for developing even more potent and specific inhibitors of both transporters. As such, although possible pharmacokinetic interactions would need to be evaluated, these inhibitors may show greater effectiveness in overcoming ABC-dependent multidrug resistance in combination with chemotherapeutics in carefully selected subsets of cancers. Another perhaps even more compelling use of these inhibitors may be in reversibly inhibiting endogenously expressed P-gp and ABCG2, which serve a protective role at various blood-tissue barriers. Inhibition of these transporters at sanctuary sites such as the brain and gut could lead to increased penetration by chemotherapeutics used to treat brain cancers or other brain disorders and increased oral bioavailability of these agents, respectively.

Prognostic Value and Implication for Chemotherapy Treatment of ABCB1 in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Chemotherapy resistance is reported to correlate with up-regulation of anti-tumor agent transporter ABCB1 (p-gp) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but the results remain controversial. To reconcile the results, a systematic review followed by meta-analysis was performed to assess the association between high ABCB1 status or ABCB1 gene variants and overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and total response rate (TR) in patients with EOC.

Materials and Methods

Electronic searches were performed using Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Chinese Wanfang databases from January 1990 to February 2016. Summary hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined using fixed or random-effects models as appropriate.

Results

Thirty-eight retrospective studies of 8607 cases qualified for meta-analysis were identified. Our results suggested that ABCB1 over-expression was significantly associated with unfavorable OS (HR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.25–1.90), PFS (HR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22–1.82) and TR (RR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54–0.75). After adjustment for age, clinical stage, residual disease, histological type and tumor grade, high ABCB1 status remained to be a significant risk factor for adverse OS and PFS. Patients with recurrent ABCB1 positivity suffered from poorer OS than those with primary ABCB1 positivity. However, stratified by chemotherapy regimen, inverse correlation between high ABCB1 status and poor OS, PFS and TR were only found in patients underwent platinum-based chemotherapy but not in patients received standard platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. No evidence was found for any association between ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and OS, PFS or TR.

Conclusion

High ABCB1 status is significantly associated with chemo-resistance and poor prognosis in patients with EOC. Large-scale, prospective studies are needed to assess the clinical value of ABCB1 expression in EOC more accurately.

Clinical trial designs for testing biomarker-based personalized therapies

BACKGROUND

Advances in molecular therapeutics in the past decade have opened up new possibilities for treating cancer patients with personalized therapies, using biomarkers to determine which treatments are most likely to benefit them, but there are difficulties and unresolved issues in the development and validation of biomarker-based personalized therapies. We develop a new clinical trial design to address some of these issues. The goal is to capture the strengths of the frequentist and Bayesian approaches to address this problem in the recent literature and to circumvent their limitations.

METHODS

We use generalized likelihood ratio tests of the intersection null and enriched strategy null hypotheses to derive a novel clinical trial design for the problem of advancing promising biomarker-guided strategies toward eventual validation. We also investigate the usefulness of adaptive randomization (AR) and futility stopping proposed in the recent literature.

RESULTS

Simulation studies demonstrate the advantages of testing both the narrowly focused enriched strategy null hypothesis related to validating a proposed strategy and the intersection null hypothesis that can accommodate to a potentially successful strategy. AR and early termination of ineffective treatments offer increased probability of receiving the preferred treatment and better response rates for patients in the trial, at the expense of more complicated inference under small-to-moderate total sample sizes and some reduction in power.

LIMITATIONS

The binary response used in the development phase may not be a reliable indicator of treatment benefit on long-term clinical outcomes. In the proposed design, the biomarker-guided strategy (BGS) is not compared to 'standard of care', such as physician's choice that may be informed by patient characteristics. Therefore, a positive result does not imply superiority of the BGS to 'standard of care'. The proposed design and tests are valid asymptotically. Simulations are used to examine small-to-moderate sample properties.

CONCLUSION

Innovative clinical trial designs are needed to address the difficulties and issues in the development and validation of biomarker-based personalized therapies. The article shows the advantages of using likelihood inference and interim analysis to meet the challenges in the sample size needed and in the constantly evolving biomarker landscape and genomic and proteomic technologies.

Pharmacokinetic profile of the microtubule stabilizer patupilone in tumor-bearing rodents and comparison of anti-cancer activity with other MTS in vitro and in vivo

INTRODUCTION

Patupilone is a microtubule stabilizer (MTS) currently in clinical development. Here, we evaluate the anti-cancer activity in vitro and in vivo in comparison to paclitaxel and describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of patupilone in tumor-bearing nude mice and rats.

METHODS

The potency in vitro of patupilone and two other MTS, paclitaxel and ixabepilone, was determined using human colon carcinoma cell lines with low (HCT-116, HT-29, RKO) and high (HCT-15) P-glycoprotein expression (P-gp), as well as two multi-drug resistance (MDR) model cell pairs, MCF7/ADR and KB-8511 cells and their respective drug-sensitive parental counterparts. The PK of patupilone was investigated in nude mice bearing HCT-15 or HT-29 xenografts and in rats bearing s.c. pancreatic CA20498 tumors or A15 glioma tumors. Anti-cancer activity in vivo was compared to that of paclitaxel using three different human tumor colon models. The retention and efficacy of patupilone was compared in small and large HT-29 xenografts whose vascularity was determined by non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Patupilone was highly potent in vitro against four different colon carcinoma cell lines including those showing multi-drug-resistance. In contrast, paclitaxel and ixabepilone displayed significantly reduced activity with markedly increased resistance factors. In both rats and mice, a single i.v. bolus injection of patupilone (1.5-4 mg/kg) rapidly distributed from plasma to all tissues and was slowly eliminated from muscle, liver and small intestine, but showed longer retention in tumor and brain with no apparent elimination over 24 h. Patupilone showed significant activity against three human colon tumor models in vivo, unlike paclitaxel, which only had activity against low P-gp expressing tumors. In HT-29 tumors, patupilone activity and retention were independent of tumor size, blood volume and flow.

CONCLUSIONS

The high potency of patupilone, which is not affected by P-gp expression either in vitro or in vivo, and favorable PK, independent of tumor vascularity, suggest that it should show significant activity in colorectal cancer and in other indications where high P-gp expression may compromise taxane activity.

Phase I study of the multidrug resistance inhibitor zosuquidar administered in combination with vinorelbine in patients with advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Zosuquidar (LY335979) is an oral P-glycoprotein modulator. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of zosuquidar in combination with vinorelbine. The effects of zosuquidar on vinorelbine pharmacokinetics were also examined.

DESIGN

Patients with advanced solid tumours were treated with escalating doses of zosuquidar administered every 8-12 h on days 7-9 and 14-16 during cycle 1 then days 0-2, 7-9, and 14-16 from cycle 2 onwards, with vinorelbine 22.5-30 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days.

RESULTS

Of 21 patients registered, 19 were treated at four dose levels (zosuquidar 100-300 mg/m2). Two patients had prolonged and febrile neutropenia at the second dose level resulting in a reduction of the dose of vinorelbine in subsequent dose levels. There was another patient with dose-limiting febrile neutropenia at dose level four which resulted in the expansion of the dose level three. Eight patients had stable disease and no objective responses were seen. Vinorelbine pharmacokinetic studies showed reduced clearance when given with zosuquidar.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD was zosuquidar 300 mg/m2 orally every 12 h for 3 days weekly for 3 weeks with vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m2 IV weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days. Zosuquidar may inhibit vinorelbine clearance to a modest degree.

Antitumor activity of irofulven against human ovarian cancer cell lines, human tumor colony-forming units, and xenografts

The objective of this study was to investigate the cytotoxic activity of irofulven (HMAF, MGI 114), a unique chemotherapeutic agent currently under clinical investigation, in various preclinical models of ovarian cancer. Antiproliferative effects of irofulven in ovarian cancer cell lines and ovarian tumor specimens were characterized in vitro using sulforhodamine B and human tumor colony-forming assays, respectively. Irofulven demonstrated marked activity against a panel of ovarian tumor cell lines, including IGROV1, OVCAR-3, OVCAR-4, OVCAR-5, OVCAR-8, and SK-OV-3, all of which exhibit various drug resistance mechanisms. In human tumor cloning assays, irofulven inhibited colony formation in surgically derived ovarian tumors at concentrations as low as 0.001 micro g /ml and indicated superior activity in comparison with paclitaxel when tested against the same tumor specimens. The antitumor activity of irofulven compared to that of paclitaxel was also examined using the SK-OV-3 xenograft model. In mice bearing subcutaneously implanted SK-OV-3 tumors, treatment with paclitaxel failed to inhibit tumor growth; whereas mice treated with maximum tolerated doses of irofulven had a 25% partial shrinkage rate, and the remaining animals had a mean tumor growth inhibition of 82%. The potent activity of irofulven against ovarian tumors in vitro and in vivo supports the evaluation of its clinical activity in ovarian cancer.

Prognostic value of P-glycoprotein and proliferative index in advanced low grade serous ovarian carcinomas

The aim of this study was to test the prognostic value of p-glycoprotein expression and the proliferative index of tumor cells on the clinical response to chemotherapy, on the brief disease-free interval (< 12 months) and on cause-specific survival in advanced ovarian carcinoma. We evaluated 83 ovarian carcinoma patients homogeneous for stage, type and grade histological. Brief disease-free interval and cause-specific survival rates (Kaplan-Meier method) were compared using the log rank test. Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards models) was used to determine the independent effect of each variable on prognosis. In the univariate analysis, P-glycoprotein expression (P < 0.0005) and proliferative index (P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0006) were independent predictors of survival and brief disease-free interval; residual disease was associated with survival (P = 0.021). In multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards models), P-glycoprotein expression (P = 0.001 and P = < 0.0005) and proliferative index (P = 0.081 and P = 0.041) were independent predictors of brief disease-free interval and survival. P-glycoprotein expression (P < 0.0005) and proliferative index (P = 0.008) were associated with clinical response to chemotherapy.

A phase II study of the MDR inhibitor biricodar (INCEL, VX-710) and paclitaxel in women with advanced ovarian cancer refractory to paclitaxel therapy

PURPOSE

Incel (biricodar, VX-710) restores drug sensitivity to P-glycoprotein (MDR1) and multidrug-resistance-associated protein (MRP1) expressing cells. This phase II study evaluated the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of VX-710 plus paclitaxel in women with advanced ovarian cancer refractory to prior paclitaxel therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eligible patients had paclitaxel-refractory disease defined as progressive disease after a minimum of two cycles of paclitaxel (weekly or 3-week schedule) or relapsed disease within 4 months of prior paclitaxel therapy. Patients received 80 mg/m(2) paclitaxel over 3 h starting 4 h after initiation of a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion of 120 mg/m(2)/h VX-710. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty patients received treatment and 45 were evaluable for response. VX-710 + paclitaxel therapy was generally well tolerated. Myelosuppression was the principal toxicity, with a median Cycle 1 nadir absolute neutrophil count of 0.27 x 10(9) cells/L and a 47% overall incidence of Grade 4 neutropenia. Mild to moderate peripheral neuritis or neuropathy was the primary nonhematologic toxicity, affecting 62% of patients. Other nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild to moderate and reversible. Paclitaxel area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) (16 +/- 5.3 microg x h/mL) during the first treatment cycle was comparable to standard 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel administered over 3 h. Of the 3 patients who achieved partial responses, 2 had progressed during prior paclitaxel therapy. Twelve patients maintained stable disease and 14/45 (31%) of patients had CA-125 reductions of 50-90% for up to 24 weeks. The median time-to-disease progression was 10 weeks for the intent-to-treat population and 20.7 weeks for the CA-125 responders.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that VX-710 with paclitaxel has modest activity in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. Further research is warranted in less heavily treated patients.

p53 and P-glycoprotein expression are significant prognostic markers in advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemo/radiotherapy

The development of biological markers of response to chemo- and radiotherapy to judge benefit to risk ratios for toxic treatments is still at an experimental stage. Tumour cell death is largely by apoptosis and the p53 gene has a major influence on this. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) accumulation has been correlated with treatment failure in several types of cancer. p53 and P-gp expression were studied in 111 advanced head and neck cancers treated with radiotherapy and up to four courses of synchronous or sequential chemotherapy. The probability of survival at 5 years for patients in the trial as a whole was 27.7%, while the cohort used for this marker project was 29.4%. Among the subjects used for the marker study at the time of analysis, 13 remained disease-free and 18 were alive. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess p53 and P-gp expression; 27/111 (24%) head and neck cancers demonstrated p53/P-gp expression and 33/111 (30%) were both p53- and P-gp- negative. In univariate analysis, both p53 and P-gp expression were associated with reduced disease-free and overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed tumour size, p53, and P-gp expression as the most powerful pretreatment prognosticators in the study cohort. Long-term follow-up results suggest that p53 and P-gp co-expression predicts the biological behaviour or the outcome following chemo/radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer.