Carbamazepine in pediatric psychiatry

The Use of Psychotropic Medication for People with Severe Disabilities and Challenging Behavior: Current Status and Future Directions

People with severe disabilities who engage in challenging behavior are often prescribed psychotropic medication as a form of intervention. Although the goal of the medication is to reduce challenging behavior, limited empirical evidence is available to support the use of psychotropic intervention for people with severe disabilities. However, across a range of drug classes basic research suggests that many psychotropic medications selectively affect dimensions of behavior that could be of benefit in reducing challenging behavior. Currently, researchers cannot demonstrate whether most drugs prescribed to reduce challenging behavior are effective or predict when adverse side effects will emerge from their use. In this article we review the basic literature on behavioral pharmacology and integrate those findings with existing applied research to update JASH readers regarding the status of psychotropic medication. From this review, we present a set of suggestions that include: (a) improving research practices, (b) increasing the diversity of individuals involved in decision-making processes regarding medication use, and (c) developing consumer-friendly strategies for monitoring drug effects.

Practical Paediatric Psychopharmacological Prescribing in Autism

Claims of ‘miracle cures’ for autism in the press and on the Internet bring new pressures to bear on parents of children with autism, and the professionals who care for them. Between a third and a half of people with autism in America are receiving some psychotropic medication. Despite recent advances in paediatric psychopharmacology, there is no proof that any medication can target the primary social impairments that characterize autism. The article discusses the evidence behind two approaches to psychopharmacological management in children with autism. The first approach selects certain target symptoms such as resistance to change, ritualistic/compulsive behaviours, hyperactivity, aggressive behaviours and sleep problems. The evidence for the effectiveness of agents including stimulants, anti- depressants, and melatonin when used to treat these symptoms is appraised. The second approach attempts to treat or cure the primary social impairment underlying autism. The evidence for the effectiveness of agents including naltrexone, fenfluramine and secretin is appraised. Early reports in this field have generated false hope, and the need for well-designed larger multicentre trials is emphasized.

Pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents

This review focuses mainly on published articles regarding the treatment of school-aged children and adolescents with pediatric bipolar disorder. In light of systematic reviews, large randomized controlled trial data are emphasized wherever possible. This review addresses the treatment of acute manic/mixed episodes, including combination treatment, the preliminary literature regarding bipolar depression among youth, treatment in the face of comorbid conditions, and maintenance treatment. Suggestions regarding future directions are offered. A clinical vignette describing a teen with bipolar disorder is presented and bipolar medications, dosing, efficacy, side effects, contraindications, and succinct comments on each medication are summarized.

A prospective open-label trial of extended-release carbamazepine monotherapy in children with bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended release carbamazepine (CBZ-ER) monotherapy in the treatment of pediatric bipolar disorder (BD).

METHOD

This was an 8-week, open-label, prospective trial of CBZ-ER monotherapy (788 +/- 252 mg/day) to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of this compound in treating pediatric bipolar spectrum disorders. Assessments included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, Children's Depression Rating Scale, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Adverse events were assessed through spontaneous self-reports, vital signs weight monitoring, and laboratory analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 27 participating children with BD, 16 (59.%) completed the study. CBZ-ER treatment was associated with statistically significant, but modest, levels of improvement in mean YMRS scores (-10.1 +/- 10.2, p < 0.001) with end-point mean YMRS score (21.8 +/- 12.2) suggesting a lack of complete resolution of mania. CBZ-ER treatment also resulted in significant improvement in the severity of depressive, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and psychotic symptoms. With the exception of 2 participants who discontinued due to skin rash, CBZ-ER was well tolerated with marginal increase in body weight (0.8 +/- 2.5 kg, p = 0.04) and was not associated with any abnormal changes in laboratory parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Open-label CBZ-ER treatment was beneficial for the treatment of BD in children. Future controlled trials are warranted.

Pharmacological interventions for bipolar youth: Developmental considerations

Despite the high prevalence rate, there have been relatively few controlled studies to systematically examine pharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with bipolar disorder. We review the differences in clinical characteristics between youth and adults with bipolar disorder and the extant literature of pharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with bipolar disorder, as well as discuss the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for treating children and adolescents who are at familial risk for developing bipolar disorder. Although the number of controlled studies of youth with manic and mixed episodes is rapidly growing, there are few studies examining treatments for depression and the prevention of recurrent affective episodes in this population. Although children and adolescents with bipolar disorder commonly present with co-occurring psychiatric disorders, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, there are limited data to guide the treatment of these patients. Recently, studies have begun to characterize prodromal manifestations of bipolar disorder and identify early intervention strategies for treating children and adolescents with an elevated risk for developing bipolar disorder.

Management options for bipolar disorder in children and adolescents

During recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the use of psychotropic medication for the treatment of bipolar disorder (BPD) in children. There is an emerging set of data to support this use.Mood stabilizers, including lithium and valproic acid (valproate sodium), have generally formed the mainstay of treatment in children and adolescents with BPD. However, the atypical antipsychotics, such as risperidone, aripiprazole, and quetiapine may be more effective as first-line treatment options and in some ways easier to use than the traditional mood stabilizers. As in adults, mood stabilization is often difficult to achieve in pediatric patients with BPD, and combined treatment with mood stabilizers and atypical antipscyhotics is commonly used. Data from controlled trials of psychotropic medications in children and adolescents with BPD are very limited, and hence, in the majority of cases physicians base their treatment decisions on data from case reports, case series, or open trials. More controlled studies of both monotherapy and polypharmacotherapy for BPD in children and adolescents are needed.

Pediatric bipolar disorder: emerging diagnostic and treatment approaches

Children and adolescents who have bipolar disorder often are encountered in clinical settings and frequently require treatment with mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics. New screening and diagnostic tools are available to aid in the diagnosis of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents. Additional data supporting the use of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics in this population also are emerging. Combinations of existing psychotropics remain the most effective treatment of pediatric bipolar disorder at this point. This article reviews the phenomenology and clinical characteristics of pediatric bipolar disorder and current approaches to pharmacotherapy. It is becoming apparent that bipolar disorder is often a chronic disorder in children and adolescents, much like diabetes, and is best managed with a combination of medications and psychosocial therapy.

Pharmacotherapy of children and adolescents with bipolar disorder

The identification and treatment of children and adolescents with a bipolar disorder is often challenging and difficult. Many of the psychotropic agents used to treat adults with bipolar disorder may also be-used to treat children and adolescents with these disorders. Further controlled trials using combination pharmacotherapy in children and adolescents with bipolar disorders are needed to advance the field of pediatric bipolarity and provide optimal care for these patients. There are multiple ongoing trials of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics that will provide important controlled data that are currently lacking in the field.

Somatic treatment of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents

The currently available data from randomized, controlled trials and a considerable amount of open clinical data suggest that adolescent-onset bipolar disorder probably responds to the same agents as adult-onset bipolar disorder. Research examining psychopharmacologic treatment approaches in the early-onset bipolar disorder is limited, however. Methodologic problems include small sample sizes, lack of comparison groups, retrospective designs,and lack of standardized measures. In addition, sometimes no clear differentiation is made between mania and bipolar disorder, the latter term being used broadly in the literature. Often the studies show that symptoms improve because of treatment, but the functioning of the patients does not improve significantly. More research is clearly needed in all aspects of this disorder but especially in examining the efficacy of various types of treatment, its longitudinal course, and diagnostic issues. The indications for, and the overall duration of, long-term maintenance therapy need further study.Many adolescents and children with bipolar disorder do not respond to any of the first-line pharmacologic treatments; therefore, studies with novel agents should be extended to patients in this age range. Furthermore, physicians will probably continue to use combination therapies when confronted by either lack of efficacy or delayed onset of efficacy with a single agent. Thus, such resultant drug-drug interactions also should also be systematically studied [97].

The use of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents with bipolar disorders

The clinical use of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics in children and adolescents with bipolar disorders has increased significantly over the past few years. These agents have multiple effects and interactions. This articles reviews the studies that support the use of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents with bipolar disorders and presents information on these agent's pharmacokinetics, dosing, and drug interactions.

Effect size of lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

To develop effect sizes for 3 mood stabilizers--lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine--for the acute-phase treatment of bipolar I or II disorder, mixed or manic episode, in children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years.

METHOD

Forty-two outpatients with a mean age of 11.4 years (20 with bipolar I disorder and 22 with bipolar II disorder) were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of open treatment with either lithium, divalproex sodium, or carbamazepine. The primary efficacy measures were the weekly Clinical Global Impression Improvement scores and the Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS).

RESULTS

Using a > or = 50% change from baseline to exit in the Y-MRS scores to define response, the effect size was 1.63 for divalproex sodium, 1.06 for lithium, and 1.00 for carbamazepine. Using this same response measure with the intent-to-treat sample, the response rates were as follows: sodium divalproex, 53%; lithium, 38%; and carbamazepine, 38% (chi 2(2) = 0.85, p = .60). All 3 mood stabilizers were well tolerated, and no serious adverse effects were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Divalproex sodium, lithium, and carbamazepine all showed a large effect size in the open treatment of children and adolescents with bipolar I or II disorder in a mixed or manic episode.

Mood stabilizers and anticonvulsants

This article provides pediatricians and other clinicians who treat children and adolescents with a working knowledge of mood stabilizers and their potential uses in children and adolescents with mood and behavior disorders. Mood stabilizers are ubiquitous agents that are often effective in the treatment of children and adolescents with bipolar disorders or conduct disorders and mentally retarded patients with aggressive behavior. The authors' also discuss mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, drug interactions, and potential uses. Following these medication details, specific information concerning the diagnosis and treatment of several child and adolescent mood and behavior disorders, and in which treatment with mood stabilizers may be helpful, is presented.

Management of suicidal behavior in children and adolescents

Many therapeutic approaches to managing suicidal behavior among youth have been used, including in-school education programs, screening programs, telephone hotlines, cognitive behavioral therapies, medication management, and inpatient milieux treatment programs. These interventions have been applied based on educational and therapeutic principles drawn from prior work with adolescents in varied scholastic and psychiatric settings. This article reviews: the assessment of risk factors among suicide attempters, emotional states, family, social isolation, interpersonal loss, substance and alcohol abuse, and treatment strategies.

A clinical approach to the pharmacotherapy of aggression in children and adolescents

Overt aggression in its various forms is the most prevalent symptom presenting to pediatric mental health providers, regardless of setting. It is a behavior with a heterogeneous etiology and requires a comprehensive approach to evaluation and treatment. Evaluation of the aggressive child must assess medical, neurologic, psychiatric, psychosocial, familial, and/or educational contributions to behavioral dyscontrol. Multimodal treatment is generally required. At present, there is no single medication to recommend for the treatment of aggressive behavior. Multiple medications have clinically been used in a nonspecific fashion to target excessive childhood aggression. Although successful for some, this approach increases risk for ineffective interventions accompanied by side effects. Until a scientific understanding of the developmental neurobiology of aggression leads to more specific treatment, this review suggests the use of a diagnostic-based approach to the pharmacology of aggression (FIG. 1). Descriptive diagnostic techniques should be used to define the presence of any primary or comorbid psychiatric disorder that presents with aggression as an associated symptom. Treating aggression in the context of these psychiatric syndromes appears to be the most direct approach. Aggression occurring in the context of a medication-responsive psychiatric diagnosis appears most sensitive to pharmacologic intervention. Presently, evidence for efficacy is strongest for aggression in the context of ADHD, psychotic disorder, adolescent-onset bipolar disorder, and ictal aggression It remains less clear that medication can help aggression when it occurs independently of a pharmacologically treatable comorbid psychiatric disorder. Aggression may respond to a target symptom approach where discrete behavioral symptoms that contribute to aggression, such as irritability, explosiveness, fear, or impulsivity, may be modified by medication intervention (FIG. 1). When treatment is approached in this fashion, it is standard practice to use the least toxic and safest intervention first. Behavioral treatment based on contingency management principles could be initially recommended. Medication trials should first use medications that have demonstrated empiric efficacy in reducing aggression (TABLE 1) and that have a favorable safety profile. Neuroleptics to treat aggression in nonpsychotic psychiatrically referred youth should be kept to a minimum, secondary to their significant adverse risk profile. Alternative medications, such as selective serotonin reuptake-inhibiting antidepressants, buspirone, lithium, anticonvulsants, opiate blocking agents, propranolol, nadolol, and clonidine, deserve more clinical research in pediatric aggression. These medications may offer effective and less toxic alternatives in the pharmacologic treatment of inappropriate excessive childhood aggression.

Carbamazepine in aggressive children with conduct disorder: a double-blind and placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To assess critically the short-term efficacy and safety of carbamazepine in the reduction of aggressiveness in children with diagnosed conduct disorder.

METHOD

Subjects were children aged 5 to 12 years who were hospitalized for treatment-resistant aggressiveness and explosiveness and who had diagnosed conduct disorder. The study was double-blind and placebo-controlled, using a parallel-groups design. Following a 2-week placebo baseline period, children who met the aggression criteria were randomly assigned to treatments for 6 weeks; the study ended with a 1-week posttreatment placebo period. Multiple raters rated the children independently, using multiple rating scales under four conditions. The main outcome measures included the Overt Aggression Scale, the Global Clinical Judgments (Consensus) Scale, and the Children's Psychiatric Rating Scale.

RESULTS

Twenty-two children, aged 5.33 to 11.7 years, completed the study. Carbamazepine was not superior to placebo at optimal daily doses ranging from 400 to 800 mg, mean 683 mg, at serum levels of 4.98 to 9.1 micrograms/mL. Untoward effects associated with administration of carbamazepine were common.

CONCLUSIONS

In this modest sample of children, the superiority of carbamazepine over placebo in reducing aggressive behavior was not demonstrated.

Carbamazepine use in children and adolescents with features of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In the United States approximately 750,000 children receive psychostimulants to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); up to 25% may not respond. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reports in the international literature concerning the efficacy of carbamazepine (CBZ) in children with ADHD features by means of meta-analysis.

METHOD

A review of the world literature located 29 reports that dealt with behavior problems, activity levels, and CBZ in children. Of these, only 10 reports provided sufficient or pertinent information for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In all seven open studies, therapeutic responses were significant (ranging from p = .05 to .0001, two-tailed t test). Meta-analysis using weighted variables revealed a significant positive correlation (r = .88; p < .02) between duration of treatment and positive outcome. In three double-blind placebo-controlled studies, treatment effects for CBZ's superiority over placebo ranged from p = .07 to .0001. A meta-analysis of these three studies revealed that CBZ was significantly (p = .018) more effective than placebo at controlling target symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the general lack of attention that CBZ has received for treating ADHD, there is preliminary evidence that CBZ may be an effective alternate treatment in children with features of ADHD.

Treatment of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current status of research in the treatment of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents.

METHOD

A Medline search was conducted for articles on pharmacological or psychosocial treatment of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents.

RESULTS

There are no controlled studies with adequate sample size of the efficacy of lithium (or any other treatments) in bipolar children and adolescents. Two large open studies suggest that, overall, lithium is beneficial, but there also are reports of lithium resistance in bipolar children and adolescents. Small open studies suggest that mood-congruent delusions and hallucinations may be treated successfully with lithium alone. Data on adjuncts or alternatives to lithium in bipolar children and adolescents are sparse. Several controlled studies have been published on psychosocial treatment of child and adolescent depression, but none on mania.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacological and psychosocial treatments of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents are understudied. There is a need for well-designed, controlled studies of lithium and alternative medications as well as adjunctive psychosocial treatments.

Pediatric psychopharmacotherapy: a review of recent research

In the past 5 years, we have witnessed the continuation of important trends in clinical research that began earlier in the decade. With regard to the treatment of specific disorders in children and adolescents, the most significant developments have been the examination of the tricyclics for the treatment of depression and the initiation of controlled studies for the treatment of Tourette syndrome. Unfortunately, the findings from the depression studies have been uniformly negative, and the results of research on both depression and tic disorders show a relatively high rate of placebo responsivity, which raises nagging questions about the role of case reports and open trials. Another important trend in pediatric psychopharmacotherapy is the search for substitutes for the neuroleptics. Potential candidates include agents such as lithium, naltrexone, fenfluramine, clonidine, and carbamazepine. The most underresearched disorders are a combination of the least common (e.g. schizophrenia, mania) and those that are apparently perceived as less serious (e.g. sleep disorders, certain anxiety disorders). Not surprisingly, the most studied disorder and treatment is hyperactivity and stimulant medication, respectively. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the social implications of the associated symptoms and their response to stimulant drugs, aided greatly by the use of direct observation procedures. Researchers are beginning to attend to the implications of comorbidity for assessing response to medication. There has been additional confirmation of efficacy of stimulant treatment for preschoolers and adolescents. Dose-response issues remain to some extent unresolved, the primary impediments being interpretive misconceptions associated with trend analysis, an overreliance on the syndromal perspective and too little attention to target behaviors and their clinical implications, and the failure to operationalize the minimal effective dose with regard to the normalization and supranormalization of target and collateral behaviors. Disagreement over whether hyperactivity is a learning or a behavior disorder (or both) and what academic underproductivity means clinically and socially is also impeding progress. With regard to developmental disorders, controlled studies indicate that fenfluramine and naltrexone are effective for managing associated symptoms in some individuals. However, given the limited amount of research on these agents, their status as clinically useful palliatives must be considered tentative.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Psychiatric aspects of epileptic children and adolescents

Epilepsy is the most prevalent neurological disorder of childhood and adolescence and a very heterogenous disease with a diverse course of illness. It may be a benign disease for the majority of children and adolescents, who recover spontaneously or are managed well medically; however, a sizeable group of children and adolescents with epilepsy, at least one-third, do manifest various difficulties--seizure control, academic, emotional, behavioral, and family problems. As a group, they have a much higher rate of psychiatric disorder than healthy children and children with other chronic illnesses. This review is undertaken to summarize the literature on epilepsy in children and adolescents, especially with respect to epidemiology, developmental and psychiatric problems, and psychiatric treatment issues.

Bipolar disorder in a prepubescent child

Early onset bipolar affective disorder (BAD) is a relatively rare psychiatric disturbance in childhood and early adolescence. Its diagnosis is difficult due to the presentation of symptoms suggestive of other psychiatric illnesses. The literature on BAD in children is reviewed with emphasis on the clinical picture, predictive factors, and pharmacotherapy. Illustrations of these points are made through the use of a case report of a boy who first presented with symptoms at age 7.

Psychopharmacology of the psychiatric disorders of childhood and adolescence

The literature on the psychopharmacology of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders is reviewed. The scanty epidemiological data suggest that psychotherapeutic drugs are utilized more widely than research findings would warrant, especially in preschool-age children. With the exception of hyperactivity, the disorders of childhood and adolescence for which the use of psychopharmacological agents is well-established are rare. This highlights the need for careful prescribing, in which the child's rights, problems with compliance and developmental and behavioural adverse effects are important considerations.

Pediatric psychopharmacologic uses of propranolol. Review and case illustrations

This article introduces child and adolescent psychiatric nurses to the use of propranolol for aggression in children and adolescents. The use of propranolol is relatively new in the area of psychiatry. A retrospective chart review of patients who had received propranolol was conducted in an intermediate care hospital. Case illustrations are presented.

Effects of carbamazepine therapy on serum sex hormone levels in male patients with epilepsy

The effects of carbamazepine (CBZ) therapy and epilepsy on sex hormone plasma levels in male patients with epilepsy were evaluated by measuring the levels of testosterone (T), free testosterone (FT), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin (PRL), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and by calculating the free androgen index (FAI) in 23 male patients with epilepsy receiving CBZ medication, in 18 untreated male patients with epilepsy, and in 19 healthy age-matched control subjects. No significant differences in the mean T or FT levels were found between the three groups, but the CBZ-treated patients had significantly higher SHBG levels and their FAI values and DHEAS concentrations were lower. The LH, FSH, PRL, or E2 levels in CBZ-treated and untreated male patients with epilepsy did not differ from the controls. CBZ monotherapy does not significantly change the serum balance of sex hormones; however, CBZ clearly affects the serum levels of SHBG and DHEAS.