A review of the psychomotor effects of paroxetine

Differentiating antidepressants of the future: Efficacy and safety

There have been significant advances in the treatment of depression since the serendipitous discovery that modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission may be a pathological underpinning of the disease. Despite these advances, particularly over the last 15years with the introduction of selective serotonin and/or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), there still remain multiple unmet clinical needs that would represent substantial improvements to current treatment regimens. In terms of efficacy there have been improvements in the percentage of patients achieving remission but this can still be dramatically improved and, in fact, issues still remain with relapse. Furthermore, advances are still required in terms of improving the onset of efficacy as well as addressing the large proportion of patients who remain treatment resistant. While this is not well understood, collective research in the area suggests the disease is heterogeneous in terms of the multiple parameters related to etiology, pathology and response to pharmacological agents. In addition to efficacy further therapeutic advances will also need to address such issues as cognitive impairment, pain, sexual dysfunction, nausea and emesis, weight gain and potential cardiovascular effects. With these unmet needs in mind, the next generation of antidepressants will need to differentiate themselves from the current array of therapeutics for depression. There are multiple strategies for addressing unmet needs that are currently being investigated. These range from combination monoaminergic approaches to subtype selective agents to novel targets that include mechanisms to modulate neuropeptides and excitatory amino acids (EAA). This review will discuss the many facets of differentiation and potential strategies for the development of novel antidepressants.

Paroxetine controlled release

A controlled-release (CR) formulation of the SSRI paroxetine has been developed. This CR formulation delays the release of paroxetine until the tablet has passed through the stomach; the drug is then released over 4-5 hours. In well designed placebo-controlled trials in patients with major depressive disorder (including a study in the elderly), social anxiety disorder or premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), paroxetine CR was consistently superior to placebo with regards to primary endpoints (i.e. mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score [major depressive disorder], Liebowitz social anxiety scale total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement score [social anxiety disorder] and Visual Analogue Scale-Mood score [PMDD]). The duration of treatment was 12 weeks or, in PMDD, over three menstrual cycles (intermittent or continuous administration). Paroxetine CR also demonstrated efficacy in three well designed studies in patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Paroxetine CR was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with an adverse-event profile typical of SSRIs, although recipients of paroxetine CR experienced significantly less nausea than recipients of immediate-release paroxetine in the first week of treatment.

Simultaneous depletion of serotonin and catecholamines impairs sustained attention in healthy female subjects without affecting learning and memory

Monoamine neurotransmitters, serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine modulate many important cognitive processes such as attention, learning and memory. While the selective effects of serotonin and catecholamine depletion on such processes have been investigated, the effects of simultaneous depletion of these monoamines on cognition remain unclear. This is of particular interest given that multiple neurotransmitter abnormalities have been implicated in many psychiatric disorders. The aim of the current study was to examine the effects of lowered brain monoamine function on cognitive performance, using the technique of amino acid precursor depletion. The study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled design in which 20 healthy female subjects were tested under a combined monoamine depletion condition (CMD) and a balanced control condition (B). Cognitive testing was conducted at baseline and 5 h post-depletion. The CMD condition relative to the B condition resulted in deficits in digit vigilance (accuracy and reaction time), a measure of sustained attention. There were no effects on measures of learning and memory or psychomotor function. These findings suggest that simultaneously depleting the availability of brain serotonin and catecholamines in healthy female subjects selectively impairs sustained attention, without affecting other cognitive domains.

A placebo controlled investigation into the effects of paroxetine and mirtazapine on measures related to car driving performance

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of paroxetine and mirtazapine on psychometric performance related to car driving, including an on-the-road test of BRT.

METHOD

In a 4-way, double blind randomised crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers received paroxetine 20mg mane, mirtazapine 15mg/30mg nocte (comparator), mirtazapine 15mg mane/15 mg b.i.d.(verum) and placebo over a 5 day period with a washout period of 7 days between treatments. Psychometric assessments included 'on-the-road' BRT (BRT), CFF (CFF), CRT (CRT) and subjective measures of sedation and sleep parameters.

RESULTS

Paroxetine had no significant effect on BRT compared with placebo. Although subjective ratings of sleep quality and sedation were impaired, there were significant improvements in both CFF and the recognition reaction component of CRT with paroxetine. Mirtazapine 15mg/30mg nocte impaired laboratory performance and some subjective tests. Mirtazapine 15mg mane/15mg b.i.d. improved sleep, but significantly impaired all other measures.

CONCLUSION

Paroxetine 20 mg/day has no psychomotor or behavioural toxicity and has no negative impact on BRT. Further research into the chronic and sub-chronic effects of mirtazapine is needed to establish the clinical significance of these results.

Persistence of cognitive impairment in geriatric patients following antidepressant treatment: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial with nortriptyline and paroxetine

Cognitive dysfunction is common in older persons suffering from a major depression. However, the degree to which this dysfunction is reversible with successful treatment of the depression remains uncertain. The present study examined the effects that treatment (randomized double-blind design) with either an SSRI (paroxetine) or a tricyclic antidepressant (nortriptyline) had on cognition in older depressed patients. The patients' performance was compared to that of a group of normal controls of similar age and education. Patients and controls were administered measures of working memory, information-processing speed, episodic memory and attention five times over the course of a 12 week trial. At baseline, the patients performed more poorly than the elderly controls on all cognitive measures. While the patients' performance did improve over the course of their treatment, the magnitude of this improvement did not exceed that produced in the elderly controls by practice alone. The same pattern of results was evident in both intent-to-treat and responder analyses. Thus, there was no evidence that the depressed patients' cognitive performance normalized after response to antidepressant therapy. Neither the patients' age at onset nor their baseline level of cognitive functioning influenced the amount by which their performance improved over the 12 week trial. There was no difference between paroxetine and nortriptyline in the amount of cognitive change associated with treatment. The present results suggest that cognitive dysfunction persists in older depressed patients even after their mood disorder has responded to antidepressant medications.

Additional dopamine reuptake inhibition attenuates vigilance impairment induced by serotonin reuptake inhibition in man

There is evidence for a specific impairment of human vigilance following enhancement of serotonergic activity by antidepressant drugs. In the present study, we investigated the putative role of serotonergic-dopaminergic interactions in diminished vigilance by comparing the attentional effects of sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with additional mild dopamine stimulating effects, with those of paroxetine, a SSRI without dopamine activity, using a placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-way cross-over design. Twenty-one (of 24) healthy middle-aged subjects completed the three treatment periods of 2 weeks in which sertraline (50 mg, days 1-7; 100 mg, days 8-14), paroxetine (20 mg, days 1-7; 40 mg, days 8-14) and placebo were administered. Vigilance (Mackworth Clock Test), selective (Stroop, Dichotic Listening) and divided attention (Dichotic Listening) were assessed at baseline and on days 7 and 14 of each treatment period. Selective and divided attention were unaffected by SSRI treatment. Subchronic administration of paroxetine impaired vigilance performance at each investigated dose. Sertraline did not produce a significant decline in vigilance performance, presumably due to its concomitant effects on dopamine activity, counteracting the negative effects of serotonin on dopamine neurotransmission. It is concluded that a serotonergically mediated reduction of dopamine activity plays an important role in the reduction of human vigilance following SSRI administration.

A preliminary investigation on the acute pharmacodynamic effects of hypericum on cognitive and psychomotor performance

Research has indicated that the herb St John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) has comparable efficacy to conventional antidepressants in the treatment of depression. Although clinical studies have demonstrated that hypericum has a superior side-effect profile compared to standard antidepressants, no study has directly compared the cognitive and psychomotor effects of hypericum with those of other antidepressants. The aim of the current study was to examine the acute effects of hypericum on cognitive and psychomotor function, and to compare its effects with those of amitriptyline. Thirteen healthy volunteers received an acute dose of placebo, amitriptyline (25 mg, positive control) or hypericum (900 mg or 1800 mg) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Cognitive and psychomotor tests and subjective measures of sedation were administered before and 1, 2 and 4 hours after drug administration. Amitriptyline impaired performance on a battery of psychological tests, which included critical flicker fusion (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT), digit symbol substitution test (DSST), profile of mood states (POMS) and the line analogue rating scale (LARS), while hypericum had neutral effects on performance in these tests. However, hypericum induced a dose-related impairment on DSST. Current findings suggest that clinical doses of hypericum do not impair attention, sensorimotor function or information processing.

Dual-task performance in depressed geriatric patients

Older patients suffering from a major depression are often impaired on tasks that require executive control processes. However, a wide variety of executive abilities exist in humans, and it is not clear that all are impaired in depression or that such impairments persist beyond remission of the depression. One executive process that plays a central role in mental operations such as working memory is the ability to co-ordinate the simultaneous performance of multiple tasks. Dual-task performance has been extensively studied in normal subjects but there is little work with depressed patients. The present study examined the performance of depressed (M age=71.0, S.D.=7.1) and control subjects (M age=69.3, S.D.=7.0) on two tasks (visual tracking and backward digit span), both when each task was carried out by itself and when the two tasks were carried out simultaneously. Dual-task performance was impaired in depressed patients prior to antidepressant treatment and this impairment persisted even after remission of the depression. These results suggest that, like other executive abilities, the ability to schedule and co-ordinate the conflicting processing demands present in a dual-task situation is impaired in depressed geriatric patients and that this impairment may be a trait effect.

The effects of antidepressants on obstructed and unobstructed gait in healthy elderly people

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients treated with antidepressants for depression are at high risk for injury due to falling. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the effects of amitriptyline, desipramine, and paroxetine on the gait of healthy elderly subjects during unobstructed and obstructed (i.e., stepping over obstacles) gait. Psychomotor and mood tests were also performed.

METHODS

A randomized, crossover, four-period, double-blind, placebo-controlled laboratory trial was performed. Twelve healthy elderly subjects (average age, 67 years; range, 65-72 years) were tested. Subjects were assigned the three antidepressant drugs or a placebo in a random order. Single doses of amitriptyline 50 mg, desipramine 50 mg, paroxetine 20 mg, or placebo were given 4 hours prior to gait testing. Temporal-distance measures and kinematics of the lower trailing limb (i.e., limb going over obstacle last) were obtained.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, amitriptyline significantly reduced gait velocity by as much as 8.0% (p = .028), cadence by as much as 4.9% (p = .012), angular velocity of hip flexion by as much as 10.0% (p = .004), and angular velocity of knee flexion by as much as 8.3% (p = 018) during the crossing strides when stepping over obstacles. Except for knee flexion angle, unobstructed gait was not affected. Amitriptyline affected integrative capacity of the central nervous system (CNS) and ability to concentrate as measured by psychomotor and mood tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The results for amitriptyline suggest that the subjects slowed their obstacle crossing speeds as a result of reduced CNS integrative capacities. Neither paroxetine nor desipramine significantly affected gait, psychomotor function, or mood.

Serotonin, noradrenaline and cognitive function: a preliminary investigation of the acute pharmacodynamic effects of a serotonin versus a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor

Comparisons of the behavioural side-effect profiles of antidepressants that inhibit either serotonin or both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake, may reveal differences in cognitive and psychomotor functions, which may be attributed to their relative pharmacological selectivity for potentiating monoamine neurotransmission in the central nervous system. The aim of the present study was to determine the acute pharmacodynamic effects of citalopram and venlafaxine, on cognitive and psychomotor performance. Nine healthy male volunteers received a single clinical dose of citalopram, venlafaxine or amitriptyline (positive control) in a double-blind placebo-controlled design. Cognitive and psychomotor tests and a subjective measure of sedation were examined before and 1, 2 and 4 hours after drug administration. Citalopram improved psychomotor responses to sensory stimuli and sustained attention, with significant decreases in movement times of the choice reaction time test and an increase in critical flicker fusion threshold. Venlafaxine did not affect performances on any of the cognitive or psychomotor tests examined. Differences may be related to relative potencies of the compounds for monoamine reuptake inhibition.

Paroxetine. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in depression and a review of its use in other disorders

Paroxetine is a potent and selective inhibitor of the neuronal reuptake of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT), which was previously reviewed as an antidepressant in Drugs in 1991. Since then, more comparative trials with other antidepressants have become available, and its use in the elderly and as long term maintenance therapy has been investigated. Paroxetine has also been studied in several other disorders with a presumed serotonergic component, primarily obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and panic disorder. In short term clinical trials in patients with depression, paroxetine produced clinical improvements that were significantly greater than those with placebo and similar to those achieved with other agents including tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), maprotiline, nefazodone and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and sertraline. Long term data suggest that paroxetine is effective in preventing relapse or recurrence of depression in patients treated for up to 1 year. In the elderly, the overall efficacy of paroxetine was at least as good as that of comparator agents. In short term clinical trials involving patients with OCD or panic disorder, paroxetine was significantly more effective than placebo and of similar efficacy to clomipramine. Limited long term data show that paroxetine is effective in maintaining a therapeutic response over periods of 1 year (OCD) and up to 6 months (panic disorder). Preliminary data suggest that paroxetine has potential in the treatment of social phobia, premenstrual dysphoric disorder and chronic headache. Like the other SSRIs, paroxetine is better tolerated than the TCAs, causing few anticholinergic adverse effects. The most commonly reported adverse event associated with paroxetine treatment is nausea, although this is generally mild and subsides with continued use. Fewer withdrawals from treatment due to adverse effects occurred with paroxetine treatment than with TCAs. The adverse events profile of paroxetine appears to be broadly similar to that of other SSRIs, although data from comparative trials are limited. Serious adverse effects associated with paroxetine are very rare. In conclusion, paroxetine is effective and well tolerated, and suitable as first-line therapy for depression. It also appears to be a useful alternative to other available agents for the treatment of patients with OCD or panic disorder.