Treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder by selegiline augmentation of antipsychotic medication. A pilot study examining the role of dopamine

Efficacy and safety of selegiline across different psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of oral and transdermal formulations

Selegiline is an irreversible, selective type-B monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) approved for Parkison's disease-oral and major depressive disorder-transdermal formulation) resulting in non-selective MAOI activity at oral doses≥20 mg/day. The present systematic review and meta-analysis appraises the evidence of different formulations/dosages of selegiline across different psychiatric conditions. We inquired PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane-Central/WHO-ICTRP/Clarivate-WebOfScience and the Chinese-Electronic-Journal Database from inception to 10/26/2022 for selegiline trials involving psychiatric patients. Random-effects meta-analyses assessed heterogeneity, publication/risk biases, and confidence in the evidence, followed by sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses. Co-primary outcomes were: changes in symptom score (standardized mean difference=SMD) and author-defined response (risk ratios=RRs). RRs of adverse events and all-cause discontinuation were secondary and acceptability outcomes, respectively. Systematic-review included 42 studies; meta-analysis, 23. Selegiline outperformed placebo in depressive symptom reduction (SMD=-0.96, 95%C.I.=-1.78, -0.14, k = 10, n = 1,308), depression (RR=1.61, 95%C.I.=1.20, 2.15, k = 9, n = 1,238) and atypical-depression response (RR=2.23, 95%C.I.=1.35, 3.68, k = 3, n = 136). Selegiline failed to outperform the placebo in negative (k = 4) or positive symptoms of schizophrenia (k = 4), attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms reduction (k = 2), and smoking abstinence rate (k = 4). Selegiline did not differ from methylphenidate and ADHD scores (k = 2). No significant difference emerged in acceptability, incident diarrhea, headache, dizziness, and nausea RRs, in contrast to xerostomia (RR=1.58, 95%C.I. =1.03, 2.43, k = 6, n = 1,134), insomnia (RR=1.61, 95%C.I.=1.19, 2.17, k = 10, n = 1,768), and application-site reaction for transdermal formulation (RR=1.81, 95%C.I.=1.40, 2.33, k = 6, n = 1,662). Confidence in findings was low/very-low for most outcomes; moderate for depressive symptoms reduction (transdermal). Selegiline proved effective, safe, and well-tolerated for depressive disorders, yet further evidence is warranted about specific psychiatric disorders.

Treatment of Clozapine-Associated Sialorrhea: The Role of Benzamide Derivatives

PURPOSE

Hypersalivation is one of the most prevalent and distressing adverse effects associated with clozapine treatment. Currently, there is no standard therapeutic approach toward how to overcome it. Clinicians use various medications for managing this adverse effect. However, some of the agents are not effective enough, whereas others can induce other adverse effects. Recently, several reviews have been published on the treatment of clozapine-associated hypersalivation, in which the focus was on drugs from various pharmacological groups, and little attention was paid to drugs from the group of substituted benzamides. The intention of this brief narrative review is to draw the attention of clinicians to the use of the benzamide group for the treatment of this unpleasant adverse effect.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify published treatment studies and case reports in the literature from 2000 to September 2021, concerning a treatment of clozapine-associated hypersalivation, mainly substituted benzamides.

RESULTS

Accumulating evidence during the last 2 decades indicates that agents derived from the benzamide group may be effective and safe agents for treatment of clozapine-associated hypersalivation. Whether with a psychotropic effect or without, medications from this group may produce a beneficial response.

CONCLUSIONS

Substitute benzamide derivatives have emerged as effective and well-tolerated agents for treatment clozapine-associated hypersalivation.

Use of Bupropion in the Management of Negative Symptom Schizophrenia: A Case Series

Antipsychotic treatment has been documented as the mainstay for the management of schizophrenia. Evidence in literature has suggested that the management of negative symptoms of schizophrenia continues to be a treatment challenge. Therefore, residual negative symptoms can become more pervasive and visible after the treatment of positive symptoms, leading to an impaired marked deficit in the vital daily functions of patients. We present a case series of three patients with a past psychiatric history of schizophrenia who presented to the psychiatric emergency with acute symptoms of schizophrenia. Following antipsychotic treatment, all these patients showed improvement of positive symptoms, however, profound negative symptoms of schizophrenia became visible. The negative symptoms include anhedonia, amotivation, alogia, affective flattening, and passive social withdrawal. We added bupropion to manage the negative symptoms, and all three patients achieved a good treatment response. This case series suggests that the anti-depressive effects of bupropion might be a valuable treatment option in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

[An effect of cholinesterase blockade on negative symptoms in schizophrenia]

Abstruct.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the possibilities of influencing the severity of negative disorders in schizophrenic patients with cholinesterase blockade.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included stable 26 patients (13 of them women), average age 40.4 (SD 11.7) with paranoid schizophrenia, episodic form according to ICD-10). All patients received antipsychotic therapy, which was not changed at least for 2 months. We used psychometric scales (Positive and Negative Syndrome Assessment Scale (PANSS), Global Functioning Scale (GAF), neurocognitive techniques (Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia-BACS), projective psychological techniques (Rorschach test).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The results of the study showed that augmentation of maintenance antipsychotic therapy with a cholinesterase blocker (ipidacrine at a dose of 20 mg per day) had positive impact on negative symptoms, decreasing the severity of emotional deficiency. The positive changes of cognitive impairment, measured with BACS, occurred regardless of changes in the severity of negative disorders, measured with PANSS. The Rorschach test showed an improvement in the conventional orientation of the patients' thinking. No exacerbation of psychotic symptoms was registered.

The Role of Selegiline in the Treatment of Negative Symptoms Associated with Schizophrenia

Objective:

To evaluate the role of selegiline in the treatment of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia.

Data Sources:

MEDLINE (1966–January 2007) and PsychINFO (1967–January 2007) were searched, using the terms schizophrenia, negative symptoms, and selegiline. A bibliographic search was conducted, as well.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

All English-language articles identified from the search were evaluated. All primary literature was included in the review.

Data Synthesis:

Based on its dopamine-enhancing property, selegiline has been studied as augmentation to antipsychotic therapy for the treatment of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia. The efficacy of low-dose oral selegiline for the treatment of negative symptoms has been evaluated in 1 case report, 2 open-label trials, and 2 controlled trials. The case report and both open-label trials report improvement of negative symptoms associated with low-dose oral selegiline. In 1 of the controlled trials, selegiline showed no difference in effect from that of placebo. These data are limited by small sample sizes. The largest controlled trial demonstrated a statistically significant difference between selegiline and placebo; however, the clinical significance is questionable, given that patients treated with selegiline were still experiencing marked negative symptoms at study completion. No comparative studies evaluating low-dose oral selegiline versus other augmentative treatment options for negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia exist at this time.

Conclusions:

Given the limitations of current literature, low-dose oral selegiline cannot be recommended for treatment of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia. Additional controlled trials are needed to better delineate whether there is a role for selegiline in decreasing the burden of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia.

Rasagiline in the Treatment of the Persistent Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The current study examined the efficacy and safety of rasagiline, a selective MAO-B inhibitor, for the treatment of persistent negative symptoms.

METHODS

Sixty people with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, who met a priori criteria for persistent negative symptoms, were randomized to receive rasagiline, 1mg/d (n = 31) or placebo (n = 29) in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total score was used to assess change in negative symptoms. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), N-Back test, a probabilistic learning task, and a delayed discounting task were used to assess cognition.

RESULTS

In a mixed model analysis of covariance (MM-ANCOVA), with time as a continuous variable, there was a significant treatment × time effect for SANS total score (F = 5.61(df = 1,40.3), P = .023). The treatment × time interaction effect was also significant for the SANS avolition subscale score (F(1,40.2) = 10.41, P = .002). In a post hoc MM-ANCOVA analyses, with time as a categorical variable, group differences were significant at week 12 for SANS total score (t(37.3) = 2.15; P = .04; d = -0.41) and SANS avolition subscale score (t(49.0) = 3.06; P = .004; d = -0.46). There was a significant difference in number of participants with a ≥20% reduction in SANS avolition score (χ(2)(1) = 10.94; P = .0009), but not in SANS total score (χ(2)(1) = 1.11; P = .29). There were no significant group differences on the RBANS, N-Back, probabilistic learning, or delayed discounting tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Study results support future studies of the utility of rasagiline for the treatment of negative symptoms, including avolition (clinicaltrials.gov trial number: NCT00492336).

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: promising therapeutic agents for Alzheimer's disease (Review)

Activated monoamine oxidase (MAO) has a critical role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including the formation of amyloid plaques from amyloid β peptide (Aβ) production and accumulation, formation of neurofibrillary tangles, and cognitive impairment via the destruction of cholinergic neurons and disorder of the cholinergic system. Several studies have indicated that MAO inhibitors improve cognitive deficits and reverse Aβ pathology by modulating proteolytic cleavage of amyloid precursor protein and decreasing Aβ protein fragments. Thus, MAO inhibitors may be considered as promising therapeutic agents for AD.

Pharmacological approaches to treating negative symptoms: a review of clinical trials

Clinical trials of pharmacological agents targeting negative symptoms in schizophrenia are reviewed. The focus is on trials that occurred in patients who were stable on an antipsychotic medication at entry to the trial. A small number of trials compared antipsychotics as monotherapy for negative symptoms. Although the data supporting amisulpride for negative symptoms is promising the trials have limitations and it is plausible that the advantages of amisulpride over placebo may result from effects on secondary negative symptoms. Among available agents, antidepressant medications may have effects in negative symptoms. Other promising agents include minocycline, glutamatergic agents, and alpha-7 nicotinic agents. More than 15 active trials are currently underway to evaluate new treatments for negative symptoms.

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

These guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology address the scope and targets of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. A consensus meeting, involving experts in schizophrenia and its treatment, reviewed key areas and considered the strength of evidence and clinical implications. The guidelines were drawn up after extensive feedback from the participants and interested parties, and cover the pharmacological management and treatment of schizophrenia across the various stages of the illness, including first-episode, relapse prevention, and illness that has proved refractory to standard treatment. The practice recommendations presented are based on the available evidence to date, and seek to clarify which interventions are of proven benefit. It is hoped that the recommendations will help to inform clinical decision making for practitioners, and perhaps also serve as a source of information for patients and carers. They are accompanied by a more detailed qualitative review of the available evidence. The strength of supporting evidence for each recommendation is rated.

Selegiline transdermal system: a novel treatment option for major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

The use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors has declined owing to the risk of hypertensive crisis following the consumption of tyramine-rich foods and the consequent need for dietary tyramine restriction. However, owing to their superior efficacy in treating depression, continued efforts have been made to develop more selective and reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Oral selegiline, at low doses, is a selective monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor, but at higher doses it loses its selectivity and can potentially interact with tyramine. Unfortunately, antidepressant effects of selegiline have been observed only at higher doses. The selegiline transdermal system was developed to deliver sustained selegiline blood concentrations sufficient to selectively inhibit MAO-A and MAO-B in the brain, producing antidepressant effects, without substantially inhibiting MAO-A in the gastrointestinal tract, thereby reducing the risk of hypertensive crisis.

OBJECTIVES

This article reviews the basic pharmacology, as well as efficacy and safety data of selegiline transdermal system for the treatment of depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Selegiline transdermal system is safe and effective in treating major depressive disorder at the dose range of 6 - 12 mg/24 h, without the need for dietary precautions at the 6 mg/24 h dose. No cases of hypertensive crisis were reported in clinical trials, even without dietary restrictions.

Efficacy of selegiline add on therapy to risperidone in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

It has been reported that selegiline, a Selective Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor B (MAOI-B), at low doses would be helpful for treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Nevertheless, the results are contradictory so far. This study was designed to investigate the effect of selegiline added to risperidone as augmentation therapy in patients with chronic schizophrenia and prominent negative symptoms in an 8 week, double blind and randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Eligible participants in this study were 40 patients with chronic schizophrenia. All patients were inpatients and were in the active phase of the illness, and met DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia. Patients were allocated in a random fashion, 20 to risperidone 6 mg/day plus selegiline 10 mg/day (5 mg bid) and 20 to risperidone 6 mg/day plus placebo. The principal measure of the outcome was Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

RESULTS

Although both protocols significantly decreased the score of the positive, negative, and general psychopathological symptoms over the trial period, the combination of risperidone and selegiline showed a significant superiority over risperidone alone in decreasing negative symptoms and PANSS total scores.

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates selegiline as a potential adjunctive treatment strategy for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Nevertheless, results of larger controlled trials are needed before recommendation for a broad clinical application can be made.

Pharmacological treatment of primary negative symptoms in schizophrenia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of primary negative symptoms is important because their presence is associated with poor outcome.

AIMS

To systematically review all studies dealing with the efficacy of pharmacological agents on primary negative symptoms.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of the relevant literature was undertaken using electronic database, reference lists and personal contact.

RESULTS

There is a lack of standardized research designs. Amisulpride is the most extensively studied drug with respect to efficacy against primary negative symptoms. At low doses it demonstrates a consistent, modest effect compared to placebo, though not to conventional antipsychotics and has yet to be tested against other atypicals. Evidence from multiple studies that used simple statistical analyses and inclusion criteria for patients with primary negative symptoms does not support a direct effect for clozapine. Path-analysis studies support the direct effects of risperidone, olanzapine, sertindole and aripiprazole, however, different statistical analyses of the same risperidone study produced conflicting results and the direct effects of olanzapine were not confirmed in selected patients with primary negative symptoms. There are no studies supporting the use of ziprasidone or quetiapine. The effects of typical antipsychotics on primary negative symptoms are inconclusive and likely to depend on drug dosages. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), mirtazepine and NMDA agonists show early promise but require further study. Novel agents such as selegiline, naltrexone, dehydroepiandrosterone, galantamine, Ginkgo, nitric oxide, L-deprenyl and pergolide show positive effects on general negative symptoms but remain untested against primary negative symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies using standardized selective inclusion criteria and controlling for chronicity are needed. Research guidelines are discussed.

Transdermal selegiline: the new generation of monoamine oxidase inhibitors

The clinical use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) has declined due to concerns about food and drug interactions and waning physician experience. Evidence indicates that MAOIs are effective in depressive disorders, in particular depression with atypical features. Efforts to address safety issues have led to the development of more selective and reversible MAOIs, such as moclobemide. Selegiline, a selective monoamine oxidase B inhibitor, has been approved for the adjunctive treatment of Parkinson's disease at low doses. At higher doses, oral selegiline is also effective in major depressive disorder (MDD) but loses its selectivity and has the potential for tyramine interactions. To overcome these problems, a transdermal formulation of selegiline, the selegiline transdermal system (STS), was developed with novel pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Compared with oral administration, transdermal selegiline leads to sustained plasma concentrations of the parent compound, increasing the amount of drug delivered to the brain and decreasing metabolite production. In addition, STS allows targeted inhibition of central nervous system monoamine A (MAO-A) and monoamine B isoenzymes with minimal effects on MAO-A in the gastrointestinal and hepatic systems, thereby reducing the risk of interactions with tyramine-rich foods (the "cheese-reaction"). Clinical trials have found 6 mg/24 hours of STS to be effective in MDD without the need for dietary restrictions. The efficacy and safety profile of STS supports its use in MDD. It is possible that STS may demonstrate benefit in MDD with atypical features or MDD resistant to other antidepressants. However, more research is needed. Clinicians should familiarize themselves with the properties and indications for the new generation of MAOIs.

Discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects of p-fluoro-L-deprenyl in monkeys

RATIONALE

para-Fluoro-L-deprenyl (Fludepryl), a halogenated derivative of L-deprenyl, shares structural similarities with amphetamine and may have potential as a medication for psychostimulant abuse.

OBJECTIVES

p-Fluoro-L-deprenyl was evaluated for psychomotor stimulant, discriminative stimulus, and reinforcing effects in squirrel monkeys.

METHODS

One group of monkeys was trained under a ten-response fixed-ratio (FR10) schedule of stimulus termination to discriminate between methamphetamine (0.32 mg/kg, i.m.) and saline. Other monkeys were trained to self-administer i.v. cocaine under either a simple FR10 schedule or a second-order fixed-interval 5-min schedule with FR10 components.

RESULTS

Full generalization to the methamphetamine-training stimulus was produced by an i.m. dose of 10.0 mg/kg p-fluoro-L-deprenyl. L-Deprenyl and the metabolites of p-fluoro-L-deprenyl, p-fluoro-L-amphetamine, and p-fluoro-L-methylamphetamine were more potent, producing full generalization at doses of 1.0-3.2 mg/kg. Under the FR10 schedule of drug injection, persistent self-administration behavior was maintained by i.v. cocaine injections but not by injections of vehicle or injection doses of p-fluoro-L-deprenyl up to 1.0 mg/kg. However, p-fluoro-L-deprenyl did maintain moderate levels of i.v. self-administration responding under the second-order schedule of drug injection. Peak response rates maintained by 0.1-mg/kg injections of p-fluoro-L-deprenyl were significantly greater than those associated with saline substitution, yet significantly lower than those maintained by cocaine or D-amphetamine.

CONCLUSIONS

p-Fluoro-L-deprenyl has methamphetamine-like discriminative-stimulus properties in squirrel monkeys that appear at higher doses than for its parent compound, L-deprenyl. It also appears to function as a relatively limited reinforcer of intravenous self-administration behavior in monkeys trained to self-administer i.v. cocaine.

Treatments for schizophrenia: a critical review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs

The treatment of schizophrenia has evolved over the past half century primarily in the context of antipsychotic drug development. Although there has been significant progress resulting in the availability and use of numerous medications, these reflect three basic classes of medications (conventional (typical), atypical and dopamine partial agonist antipsychotics) all of which, despite working by varying mechanisms of actions, act principally on dopamine systems. Many of the second-generation (atypical and dopamine partial agonist) antipsychotics are believed to offer advantages over first-generation agents in the treatment for schizophrenia. However, the pharmacological properties that confer the different therapeutic effects of the new generation of antipsychotic drugs have remained elusive, and certain side effects can still impact patient health and quality of life. Moreover, the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs is limited prompting the clinical use of adjunctive pharmacy to augment the effects of treatment. In addition, the search for novel and nondopaminergic antipsychotic drugs has not been successful to date, though numerous development strategies continue to be pursued, guided by various pathophysiologic hypotheses. This article provides a brief review and critique of the current therapeutic armamentarium for treating schizophrenia and drug development strategies and theories of mechanisms of action of antipsychotics, and focuses on novel targets for therapeutic agents for future drug development.

Negative symptoms and neuroleptics in catatonic schizophrenia

The association between neuroleptic treatment and the negative symptom dimension (ND) was evaluated in 1528 schizophrenia patients. In patients receiving more than 820 mg chlorpromazine (CPZ), those with catatonic-type disorder had significantly (p<0.05) higher ND scores than those in any of the other diagnostic subtypes. Even in patients receiving 450 mg CPZ or more, catatonic patients had significantly (p=0.046) higher ND scores than other patients. Patients with catatonic schizophrenia are highly vulnerable to negative symptoms related to neuroleptic drugs, probably because of a defect in their dopaminergic neuronal pathways.

Deprenyl augmentation for treating negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a double-blind, controlled study

Augmentation of dopaminergic neurotransmission has been suggested as a treatment strategy for negative symptoms of schizophrenia. On the basis of open studies that reported the potential benefit of deprenyl (selegiline) as augmentation to antipsychotic treatment, this double-blind, controlled study was designed to further address this question. Sixteen schizophrenic patients with predominately negative symptoms, manifesting clinical stability on maintenance antipsychotic treatment, were randomly assigned to receive either deprenyl 15 mg/day or placebo in addition to their antipsychotic treatment for 8 weeks. Clinical follow-up and ratings were done during this period and for 8 more weeks after deprenyl discontinuation. Both groups showed a statistically significant but clinically marginal improvement over the 8 weeks of deprenyl or placebo treatment. This improvement was abolished during the postdiscontinuation follow-up period. Deprenyl at a dose of 15 mg/day did not offer therapeutic benefit in our patients. A significant placebo effect was observed, which may be the result of increased patient-doctor contact during the study.

Selegiline augmentation of antipsychotics for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia

This case series describes three patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia attending a continuing day treatment (CDT) program. They showed significant improvement in negative symptoms and overall functioning after the addition of selegiline to the antipsychotic regimen. No side effects were observed with this combination.

Toward a rational pharmacotherapy of comorbid substance abuse in schizophrenic patients

The prevalence of substance abuse is elevated among schizophrenic patients. When free of illicit substances and sober, substance-abusing schizophrenic patients may have a better prognosis than other frequently hospitalized schizophrenic patients. However, the cost of substance abuse is great in terms of rehospitalization, homelessness, risk of other medical illness, disruption of social and vocational function, exacerbation of symptoms, suicide, and increased health care expenses. Important recent developments in medications for reducing substance abuse in nonschizophrenic populations make it timely to consider factors that might contribute to substance abuse among schizophrenic patients. This review will focus on substances most frequently abused by schizophrenic patients: nicotine, alcohol, cannabis, and psychostimulants. It concentrates on two conceptual foci: "self-medication hypotheses" and "comorbid addiction vulnerability hypotheses". The relationship between these hypotheses and possible pharmacotherapeutic approaches for substance-abusing schizophrenic patients will be considered.

Depressive symptoms and presynaptic dopamine function in neuroleptic-naive schizophrenia

We have previously reported aberrations in the striatal presynaptic dopamine function in neuroleptic-naive schizophrenic patients compared to healthy controls (Hietala, J., Syvälahti, E., Vuorio, K. et al., 1995. Lancet 346, 1130-1131). In this extended study we explore whether the altered presynaptic dopamine function correlates with the clinical symptomatology in schizophrenia. Striatal dopamine synthesis capacity (6-[18F]fluorodopa (FDOPA) uptake, Ki values) was studied with positron emission tomography in 10 neuroleptic-naive schizophrenic patients and 13 healthy controls. The clinical symptomatology was characterized with the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS). The patients had an increased FDOPA uptake in striatum and lacked the asymmetry in caudate FDOPA uptake (p = 0.0005), confirming our earlier results. Left striatal FDOPA uptake (Ki) values correlated negatively with depressive symptoms in a highly significant manner. On the other hand, paranoid symptomatology correlated positively with right putamen FDOPA uptake at a trend level (rho = 0.73, p < 0.02). The lack of asymmetry in caudate Ki values did not associate with any dimension of psychopathology. The major finding in this study is that depressive symptoms in neuroleptic-naive first-admission schizophrenia are associated with low presynaptic dopamine function. This link appears to be hemisphere-related and may have drug-treatment implications, e.g., in prediction of response to D2 receptor blocking antipsychotic drugs. A possible connection between paranoid symptomatology and subcortical hyperdopaminergia is suggested, but this remains to be further verified.

The new antipsychotics, and their potential for early intervention in schizophrenia

Over almost four decades, few fundamentally different antipsychotic drugs evolved to challenge classical neuroleptics as the mainstay of the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. However, the recent re-emergence of clozapine, together with the emergence of risperidone, portends an increasing number of new antipsychotics which are now either traversing the stages of regulatory approval or else well-advanced in clinical development. This article first evaluates the significance of clozapine and risperidone; it then reviews some of the new antipsychotics and how they might be classified vis-a-vis potential advantages for patients, outlines putative mechanisms and new therapeutic targets, and considers whether such agents may act on any disease process inherent to schizophrenia. One fundamental issue is the extent to which the new antipsychotics might shift materially the risk benefit balance towards intervention, not just at the earliest possible stage following the onset of psychosis but at a yet earlier, 'prodromal' phase of the disorder where there is a considerably greater likelihood of 'treating' behavioural disturbances that prove not to be the harbingers of psychotic illness.