A Double-Blind, Parallel, Comparative Evaluation of Amlodipine vs. Captopril in the Monotherapeutic Treatment of Mild and Moderate Essential Hypertension

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced cough compared with placebo, and other antihypertensives: A systematic review, and network meta-analysis

Studies have shown that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are superior in primary and secondary prevention for cardiac mortality and morbidity to angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs). One of the common side effects from ACEI is dry cough. The aims of this systematic review, and network meta-analysis are to rank the risk of cough induced by different ACEIs and between ACEI and placebo, ARB or calcium channel blockers (CCB). We performed a systematic review, and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to rank the risk of cough induced by each ACEI and between ACEI and placebo, ARB or CCB. A total of 135 RCTs with 45,420 patients treated with eleven ACEIs were included in the analyses. The pooled estimated relative risk (RR) between ACEI and placebo was 2.21 (95% CI: 2.05-2.39). ACEI had more incidences of cough than ARB (RR 3.2; 95% CI: 2.91, 3.51), and pooled estimated of RR between ACEI and CCB was 5.30 (95% CI: 4.32-6.50) Moexipril ranked as number one for inducing cough (SUCRA 80.4%) and spirapril ranked the least (SUCRA 12.3%). The order for the rest of the ACEIs are as follows: ramipril (SUCRA 76.4%), fosinopril (SUCRA 72.5%), lisinopril (SUCRA 64.7%), benazepril (SUCRA 58.6%), quinapril (SUCRA 56.5%), perindopril (SUCRA 54.1%), enalapril (SUCRA 49.7%), trandolapril (SUCRA 44.6%) and, captopril (SUCRA 13.7%). All ACEI has the similar risk of developing a cough. ACEI should be avoided in patients who have risk of developing cough, and an ARB or CCB is an alternative based on the patient's comorbidity.

Sex- and age-related antihypertensive effects of amlodipine. The Amlodipine Cardiovascular Community Trial Study Group

This community-based study assessed whether there were age, sex, or racial differences in response to amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. This prospective, open-label trial had a 2-week placebo period, a 4-week upward drug titration/efficacy period, and a 12-week drug maintenance period. There were 1,084 evaluable patients (mean age 55.5 years; 65% men and 35% women; 79% white and 21% black; 75% <65 and 25% > or = 65 years old). At the end of the titration/efficacy phase, the mean +/- SD blood pressure (BP) decreased by -16.3 +/- 12.3/-12.5 +/- 5.9 mm Hg, (p < or = 0.0001). Amlodipine produced a goal BP response (sitting diastolic BP < or = 90 mm Hg, or a 10 mm Hg decrease) in 86.0% of patients overall. The BP response was greater in women (91.4%) than in men (83.0%, p < or = 0.001), and greater in those > or = 65 years old (91.5%) than in those < 65 years old (84.1%, p < or = 0.01); however, it was similar between whites and blacks (86.0% vs 85.9%, respectively, p = NS). The sex difference in BP response could not be fully explained by differences in age, weight, dose (mg/kg), race, baseline BP, or compliance, and there were no differences among women based on use of hormone replacement therapy. Amlodipine was well tolerated; mild to moderate edema was the most common adverse effect. Thus, amlodipine was effective and safe as once-a-day monotherapy in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension in a community-based population. Women had a greater BP response to amlodipine.