Partial agonist activity of celiprolol

Comparative Effects of Preoperative Angiotensin-converting Enzyme In-hibitor, Statin and Beta-blocker Treatment on Human Internal Mammary Artery Reactivity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

We investigated the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)- inhibitor, statin, and beta-blocker usage before coronary bypass surgery (CABG) on vascular reactivity of the internal mammary artery (IMA).

METHODS

Patients, who underwent elective CABG were evaluated. Samples of IMA obtained from 22 patients were divided into 4 groups in respect of drugs used by patients before bypass surgery (control group, ACE inhibitor + statin group, ACE inhibitor + statin + beta-blocker group, and ACE inhibitor + beta-blocker group). The discarded, distal end section of IMA was carefully removed, and the vasoreactivity of IMA rings was evaluated in vitro using an organ chamber. Smooth muscle contractile function was tested on artery segments exposed to 10-80 mM KCl and norepinephrine. The endothelial function of IMA rings was assessed with acetylcholine (ACh) and bradykinin, while endothelium-independent vasorelaxation was evaluated by sodium nitroprusside (SNP).

RESULTS

Both ACh and bradykinin caused concentration-dependent relaxation in endothelium-intact IMA rings. However, the maximal effect produced by endothelium-dependent agents in all treatment groups was more prominent when compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in the endothelium-dependent relaxation response of IMA between ACE inhibitor + statin, ACE inhibitor + beta-blocker and ACE inhibitor + statin + beta-blocker groups. The vasodilatory potency of SNP was similar in all groups. Similarly, contractile response to KCl or norepinephrine was not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Use of ACE inhibitors and statins before bypass surgery may influence IMA vasoreactivity by improving endothelial control of vascular tone.

The role of third-generation beta-blocking agents in chronic heart failure

Third-generation beta-blocking agents developed for the hypertension market are proving useful in the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF). These compounds share the ancillary property of vasodilation, which improves acute tolerability by unloading the failing left ventricle at a time when beta-adrenergic withdrawal produces myocardial depression. In the case of carvedilol and bucindolol, this allows for the administration of nonselective beta blockade. Because of blockade of both beta 1 and beta 2 adrenergic receptors as well as other properties, these compounds possess a more comprehensive antiadrenergic profile than second-generation, beta 1-selective compounds. For this and potentially other reasons, third-generation beta-blocking agents have theoretical efficacy advantages that have yet to be demonstrated in large-scale trials. Ongoing trials with either second- or third-generation compounds and one trial directly comparing a compound from each class will provide the answer as to whether third-generation compounds have an advantage in the treatment of chronic HF.

The control of adrenergic function in heart failure: therapeutic intervention

Chronic heart failure is characterised by excess adrenergic activity that augurs a poor prognosis. The reasons for increased adrenergic activity are complex and incompletely understood. The circumstantial evidence relating increased activity to adverse outcome is powerful, but not yet conclusive. In normal subjects, autonomic control of the circulation is predominantly under the control of sympatho-inhibitory inputs from the arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors, with a small input from the excitatory ergo- and chemo-receptors. In heart failure, the situation is reversed, with loss of the restraining input from the baroreceptors and an increase in the excitatory inputs, resulting in excessive adrenergic activity. The circumstantial evidence linking neuroendocrine activation with poor outcome coupled with the clinical success of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has long suggested that inhibition of adrenergic activity might be beneficial in heart failure. There is a number of potential ways of achieving this. Improved treatment of heart failure itself may reduce sympathetic drive. There is an interplay between angiotensin II, aldosterone and the sympathetic nervous system, and thus RAAS antagonists, such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and spironolactone could directly reduce sympathetic activation. Exercise rehabilitation may similarly reduce sympathetic activity.Recently, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists have been conclusively shown to improve symptoms, reduce hospitalisations and increase survival. However, the demonstration that central reduction of sympathetic activity with agents such as moxonidine increases morbidity and mortality suggests that we do not properly understand the role of sympathetic activation in the pathophysiology of heart failure.

Celiprolol augments the effect of physical exercise on insulin sensitivity and serum lipid levels in chronic heart failure

PURPOSE

Impaired insulin sensitivity has been linked with chronic heart failure (CHF). Exercise has a beneficial effect on insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects. It is used also as an adjunctive therapy in patients with CHF. We studied the effect of randomized treatment with celiprolol, a vasodilating beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist, 200 mg once daily (n=20) or placebo (n=11) on serum lipid levels and insulin sensitivity in patients with CHF. In addition, all subjects participated in a 6-month exercise training protocol. Thirteen subjects in the celiprolol and eight subjects in the control group were on additional beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist as part of their tailored CHF therapy. Insulin sensitivity was determined using the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp test (diabetic subjects excluded, n=11 for the celiprolol group and n=8 for the placebo group).

RESULTS

Insulin sensitivity index (ISI) increased by 33% (P<0.05) in the celiprolol group and by 17% (NS) in the control group. The mean increase in the whole group was 20% [from 68.2+/-11.5 to 81.7+/-10.7 ml/min/kg (mU/l), P<0.05]. No change was found in the total cholesterol level. HDL cholesterol levels increased by 12% (from 0.98+/-0.05 to 1.10+/-0.05 mmol/l, P<0. 005), and HDL/total cholesterol and HDL/LDL cholesterol ratios by 15% and 16%, respectively (P<0.005). The increase in serum fasting HDL cholesterol level was greater in the celiprolol-treated group (P<0.05). At baseline ISI correlated with maximal oxygen uptake (r=0. 65, P<0.0001) and body mass index (r=-0.55, P<0.001). The change in ISI correlated weakly with the improvement in muscle exercise capacity (r=0.53, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin sensitivity and serum lipid levels may be favorably affected by exercise training in subjects with mild-to-moderate CHF. Celiprolol, a vasodilating beta1- selective adrenoceptor antagonist, potentiates this effect.

Cardiac effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity in humans: beta1- and/or beta2-adrenoceptor mediated?

The aim of this study was to find out whether cardiac responses to the beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) xamoterol and celiprolol are mediated by cardiac beta1- or beta2-adrenoceptors or both. For this purpose we assessed, in six healthy male volunteers, the effects of xamoterol (100 and 200 mg, p.o.) and celiprolol (200, 600, and 1,200 mg, p.o.) on blood pressure, heart rate, and heart rate-corrected duration of the electromechanical systole (QS2c, as a measure of inotropism). Xamoterol, in both doses, increased systolic blood pressure and heart rate, transiently decreased diastolic blood pressure, and shortened QS2c; all these effects were attenuated after pretreatment of the volunteers with the beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist bisoprolol. Celiprolol, in all three doses, increased heart rate, decreased diastolic blood pressure, and shortened QS2c but only marginally increased systolic blood pressure. Bisoprolol did not attenuate these celiprolol effects but rather enhanced celiprolol effects on systolic blood pressure and heart rate. In a further set of experiments, we studied cardiovascular effects of celiprolol in six healthy volunteers whose beta2-adrenoceptors had been desensitized by a 2-week treatment with 3x5 mg/day terbutaline. Under these conditions, celiprolol failed to increase heart rate or to shorten QS2c. We conclude that, under resting conditions, in healthy volunteers, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with ISA can exert increases in heart rate and contractility that are mediated by either cardiac beta1-adrenoceptor (xamoterol) or cardiac beta2-adrenoceptor (celiprolol) stimulation. Thus in the human heart, the ISA of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists can be a beta1- or beta2-adrenoceptor agonistic component.

LK 204-545, a highly selective beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist at human beta-adrenoceptors

LK 204-545 ((+/-)-1-(2-(3-(2-cyano-4-(2-cyclopropyl-methoxy-ethoxy)phenoxy)-2-hydro xy-propyl-amino)-ethyl)-3-(4-hydrxy-phenyl) urea), an antagonist that possesses high beta1-/beta2-selectivity in the rat, and a range of cardio-selective and non-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonists were examined to compare their radioligand binding affinities for human beta1-, beta2- and beta3-adrenoceptors transfected into CHO cells. LK 204-545 and CGP 20712A displayed the highest beta1-/beta2- (approximately 1800 and approximately 650, respectively) and beta1-/beta3-selectivity (approximately 17000 and approximately 2200, respectively) at human beta-adrenoceptors with LK 204-545 being approximately 2.75-fold more beta1-/beta2-selective and approximately 8-fold beta1-/beta3-selective than CGP 20712A. The high potency of LK 204-545 at transfected human beta1-adrenoceptors and in functional models of rat beta1-adrenoceptors together with its high selectivity, identify it as a useful ligand for studying beta1-adrenoceptors and suggest that it may be the preferred ligand for human beta-adrenoceptor studies.

Sensitization of human atrial 5-HT4 receptors by chronic beta-blocker treatment

BACKGROUND

Chronic treatment of patients with beta-blockers induces beta 2-adrenergic receptor hyperresponsiveness in atrium and sinoatrial node. To investigate whether other atrial Gs protein-coupled receptors also become hyperresponsive after chronic treatment with beta-blockers, we investigated 5-HT4 receptors in tissues and myocytes, which mediate serotonin-evoked increases of both contractile force and cAMP levels.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Isolated right atrial strips from patients who had been chronically treated or not treated with a beta-blocker were set up to contract. In tissues from beta-blocker-treated patients (n = 27), the maximum inotropic response to serotonin was 56 +/- 3% (mean +/- SEM) of the effect elicited by (-)-isoproterenol (200 mumol/L) compared with a response of 19 +/- 6% in tissues from non-beta-blocker-treated patients (n = 13) (P < .001). The responsiveness of the tissues to Ca2+ was unchanged by chronic beta-blocker treatment. Serotonin (1 and 10 mumol/L) increased tissue cAMP levels, the increase with 10 mumol/L being significantly greater (P < .05) in tissues from beta-blocker-treated (n = 9) than in non-beta-blocker-treated (n = 7) patients. In paced atrial myocytes, serotonin caused concentration-dependent increases in contraction. Myocytes obtained from atria of beta-blocker-treated patients were more sensitive (P < .01) to the effects of serotonin (-log EC50, 7.9 +/- 0.2 mol/L; n = 12) than myocytes obtained from non-beta-blocker-treated patients (-log EC50, 7.3 +/- 0.2 mol/L, n = 12). Chronic beta-blocker treatment had no effect on forskolin-evoked myocyte responses. Carbachol (1 mumol/L) suppressed the effects of both serotonin (n = 6) and (-)-isoproterenol (n = 6) in the same atrial myocyte.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic treatment of patients with beta-blockers causes atrial 5-HT4 receptor inotropic hyperresponsiveness and enhanced serotonin-evoked increases in cAMP levels. This may be due to modified cross talk between 5-HT4 receptors, beta-adrenergic receptors, and muscarinic receptors.

Association between serum lipids, glucose tolerance, and insulin sensitivity during 12 months of celiprolol treatment

The study was undertaken to evaluate the development and association of parameters related to the metabolic syndrome during celiprolol treatment. Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp and independent oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were performed on 25 nondiabetic patients with controlled hypertension and dyslipidemia. The tests were carried out during the patients' previous antihypertensive monotherapy (beta- or Ca-blocker, or an ACE inhibitor), and after 6 and 12 months of celiprolol treatment. About one third of patients were randomized to a control group in which treatment was kept unchanged. Insulin sensitivity index (ISI), measured by the euglycemic clamp test, increased 35% in the celiprolol group at 6 months and remained at that level at 12 months, independent of the previous treatment (p = 0.03, compared to the change in the control group). During a 2 hour OGTT, incremental glucose area under the curve (AUC) decreased from 4.5 to 1.9 hr x mmol/l during 6 months of celiprolol treatment, and decreased further to 1.5 hr x mmol/l at 12 months (p < 0.001). Insulin AUC decreased from 113 to 72 hr x mU/l, and decreased further to 68 hr x mU/l (p < 0.01). All insulin parameters in OGTT were highly significant (p < 0.0001) and inversely associated with ISI. Insulin AUC had the best linear correlation with ISI (r = -0.682, p < 0.0001). Glucose parameters in OGTT correlated only weakly and inversely with insulin sensitivity. From the fasting serum lipids, triglycerides showed an inverse (p < 0.001) and HDL a weak (p < 0.05) positive association with ISI. Four out of 20 metabolic, clinical, and demographic parameters proved to be independently significant predictors for ISI in multiple regression analysis. These were insulin AUC, fasting insulin levels, triglyceride values, and age. The coefficient of determination in this four-parameter linear model was 69%. In this preliminary, observer-masked trial with a limited control group, celiprolol improved the impaired insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance of dyslipidemic hypertensive patients. A fairly predictive model can be formulated to evaluate the peripheral insulin sensitivity of hypertensive patients with suspected metabolic syndrome using OGTT with serum insulin determinations.