Effects of adenosine receptor subtype A1 on ventricular and renal function

Hemodynamics and myocardial blood flow patterns after placement of a cardiac passive restraint device in a model of dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The present study examined a cardiac passive restraint device which applies epicardial pressure (HeartNet Implant; Paracor Medical, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) in a clinically relevant model of dilated cardiomyopathy to determine effects on hemodynamic and myocardial blood flow patterns.

METHODS

Dilated cardiomyopatht was established in 10 pigs (3 weeks of atrial pacing, 240 beats/min). Hemodynamic parameters and regional left ventricular blood flow were measured under baseline conditions and after acute placement of the HeartNet Implant. Measurements were repeated after adenosine infusion, allowing maximal coronary vasodilation and coronary flow reserve to be determined.

RESULTS

Left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction occurred relative to baseline as measured by echocardiography. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension increased and left ventricular fractional shortening decreased (3.8 ± 0.1 vs 6.1 ± 0.2 cm and 31.6% ± 0.5% vs 16.2% ± 2.1%, both P < .05, respectively), consistent with the dilated cardiomyopathy phenotype. The HeartNet Implant was successfully deployed without arrhythmias and a computed median mid-left ventricular epicardial pressure of 1.4 mm Hg was applied by the HeartNet Implant throughout the cardiac cycle. Acute HeartNet placement did not adversely affect steady state hemodynamics. With the HeartNet Implant in place, coronary reserve was significantly blunted.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large animal model of dilated cardiomyopathy, the cardiac passive restraint device did not appear to adversely affect basal resting myocardial blood flow. However, after acute HeartNet Implant placement, left ventricular maximal coronary reserve was blunted. These unique results suggest that cardiac passive restraint devices that apply epicardial transmural pressure can alter myocardial blood flow patterns in a model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Whether this blunting of coronary reserve holds clinical relevance with chronic passive restraint device placement remains unestablished.

Drug discovery for heart failure: a new era or the end of the pipeline?

Although there have been significant advances in the therapy of heart failure in recent decades, such as the introduction of beta-blockers and antagonists of the renin-angiotensin system, there is still a major unmet need for better therapies for many patients with heart failure. However, disappointment related to late-stage clinical failures of a number of novel agents, including endothelin antagonists and tumour-necrosis factor blockers, has reduced the impetus of drug development in this field. Here, we review possible targets for heart failure therapy that have emerged from recent progress in our understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms, and highlight key issues that need to be addressed to improve the chances of success of novel therapies directed against these targets.

Review of current and investigational pharmacologic agents for acute heart failure syndromes

Acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) are a major public health problem and present a therapeutic challenge to clinicians. Commonly used agents in the treatment of AHFS include diuretics, vasodilators (eg, nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, nesiritide), and inotropes (eg, dobutamine, dopamine, milrinone). Patients admitted to hospital with AHFS and low cardiac output state (AHFS/LO) represent a subgroup with very high inhospital and postdischarge mortality rates. Most of these patients require intravenous inotropic therapy. However, the use of current intravenous inotropes has been associated with risk for hypotension, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, and possibly increased postdischarge mortality, particularly in those with coronary artery disease. Consequently, there is an unmet need for new agents to safely improve cardiac performance (contractility and/or active relaxation) in this patient population. This article reviews a selection of current and investigational agents for the treatment of AHFS, with a main focus on the high-risk patient population with AHFS/LO.

Emerging therapies for the management of decompensated heart failure: from bench to bedside

While pharmaceutical innovation has been highly successful in reducing mortality in chronic heart failure, this has not been matched by similar success in decompensated heart failure syndromes. Despite outstanding issues over definitions and end points, we argue in this paper that an unprecedented wealth of pharmacologic innovation may soon transform the management of these challenging patients. Agents that target contractility, such as cardiac myosin activators and novel adenosine triphosphate-dependent transmembrane sodium-potassium pump inhibitors, provide inotropic support without arrhythmogenic increases in cytosolic calcium or side effects of more traditional agents. Adenosine receptor blockade may improve glomerular filtration and diuresis by exerting a direct beneficial effect on glomerular blood flow while vasopressin antagonists promote free water excretion without compromising renal function and may simultaneously inhibit myocardial remodeling. Urodilatin, the renally synthesized isoform of atrial natriuretic peptide, may improve pulmonary congestion via vasodilation and enhanced diuresis. Finally, metabolic modulators such as perhexiline may optimize myocardial energy utilization by shifting adenosine triphosphate production from free fatty acids to glucose, a unique and conceptually appealing approach to the management of heart failure. These advances allow optimism not only for the advancement of our understanding and management of decompensated heart failure syndromes but for the translational research effort in heart failure biology in general.

Novel pharmacological treatments for heart failure

Pharmacological therapies remain the primary strategy for treating patients with acute and chronic heart failure. Several novel neurohormonal antagonists, inotropic agents, immune modulators, and metabolic and replacement therapies are currently in development to meet the demands of an increasing number of patients with heart failure. The success in drug development in this field will require a better understanding of the effects of heart failure on drug dosing, better integration of novel and existing drug therapies, the development of more reliable surrogate markers to effectively tailor medical therapy to individual needs and the ability to detect and treat patients at risk before the onset of heart failure.

Cellular mechanisms for the treatment of chronic heart failure: the nitric oxide- and adenosine-dependent pathways

Accumulated evidence suggests that several drugs proven to improve survival in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) enhance endogenous nitric oxide (NO)- and/or adenosine-dependent pathways. Indeed, we and others have demonstrated that: i) antagonists of either renin-angiotensin-aldosterone or beta-adrenergic systems enhance NO-dependent pathways; ii) although carvedilol and amlodipine belong to different drug classes, both of them can increase cardiac adenosine levels; iii) increased adenosine levels by dipyridamole are associated with the improvement of CHF. Interestingly, both NO and adenosine have multifactorial beneficial actions in cardiovascular systems. First of all, both of them induce vasodilation and decrease myocardial hypercontractility, which may contribute to a reduction in the severity of myocardial ischaemia. Both adenosine and NO are also involved in cardioprotection attributable to acute and late phases of ischaemic preconditioning, respectively. Secondly, they can modulate the neurohormonal systems that contribute to the progression of CHF. Thus, we propose that enhancement of endogenous NO and/or adenosine as potential therapeutic targets in a new strategy for the treatment for CHF.

Adenosine A1 receptor antagonists and the kidney

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will examine the most recent evidence that adenosine receptors in the kidney can alter kidney function. Adenosine A(1)-receptors located in the afferent arteriole and proximal tubule can contribute to fluid retaining disorders by mediating tubuloglomerular feedback, afferent arteriole vasoconstriction or direct sodium absorption. In addition, A(1)-receptors may have a role for the prevention or treatment of ischemic injury to the kidney by maintaining afferent arteriole vasodilatation and preserving the glomerular filtration rate.

RECENT FINDINGS

Animal and human studies confirm that adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonists are useful adjuvants to the treatment of congestive heart failure by increasing diuresis and natriuresis and preserving the glomerular filtration rate. These agents most likely function to directly inhibit tubular absorption of sodium, as well as inhibit tubuloglomerular feedback. There is increasing evidence that adenosine A(1)-receptors directly affect the release of renin, and that adenosine and angiotensin II act synergistically to increase renal vascular resistance and decrease renal blood flow. The ability of adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonists to preserve the glomerular filtration rate and protect the kidney against ischemic damage or drug toxicity is not well established.

SUMMARY

The utility of adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonists in the treatment of congestive heart failure should lead to larger clinical trials of these agents. There is increasing evidence that the receptors mediate vasoconstriction that is unique to the renal microcirculation. However, studies of adenosine A(1)-receptor antagonists in animal models have largely been unsuccessful in preventing ischemic kidney damage, most likely due to the diversity of factors and events that are involved.

Adenosine type 1 receptor antagonists in fluid retaining disorders

Adenosine is a vasoactive hormone whose action is mediated through at least four receptors. The most prevalent receptors are type 1, which promote vasoconstriction, and type 2, comprised of 2 subtypes (a,b) that promote vasodilation. In the kidney, type 1 receptors located on preglomerular vessels and in the tubule are involved in the regulation of glomerular filtration. Whole body fluid balance is strongly dependent on the ability of the kidney to maintain stable glomerular filtration. Several antagonists to adenosine type 1 receptors have been developed. These agents generate excess fluid (diuresis) and sodium (natriuresis) excretion in control animals and animal models of fluid retention, as well as in normal and oedematous humans. In both animals and humans, these effects are generally achieved without major changes in glomerular filtration. Animal studies have confirmed the location of adenosine type 1 receptors in relevant tissue sites in the kidney. More highly selective antagonists for adenosine type 1 receptors are regularly developed, improving their use in fluid retaining disorders. Clinical trials with these agents have commenced for the treatment of hypertension, renal failure and congestive heart failure, all disorders that include varying levels of fluid retention. The clinical trial results have been mixed. The early results with congestive heart failure suggest great promise for these agents, whereas trials in hypertension and renal failure have been equivocal.

Cardiorenal effects of adenosine subtype 1 (A1) receptor inhibition in an experimental model of heart failure

BACKGROUND

Elaboration of a number of bioactive substances, including adenosine, occurs in heart failure (HF). Adenosine, through the adenosine subtype 1 (A1) receptor, can reduce renal perfusion pressure and glomerular filtration rate and increase tubular sodium reabsorption, which can affect natriuresis and aquaresis. Accordingly, the present study examined the acute effects of selective A1 receptor blockade on hemodynamics and renal function in a model of HF.

STUDY DESIGN

HF was induced in adult pigs (n = 19) by chronic pacing (240 beats/min for 3 weeks). The pigs were then instrumented for hemodynamic and renal function measurements. After baseline measurements were taken, pigs received either A1 block [ 1 mg/kg BG9719 (1,3-dipropyl-8-[2(5,6-epoxynorbornyl)]xanthine; n = 9)] or infusion of vehicle (n = 10), and measurements were repeated at intervals for up to 2 hours. Normal controls (n = 7) were included for comparison.

RESULTS

Cardiac output remained unchanged between the A1 block and vehicle groups throughout the study. Pulmonary vascular resistance fell 38% from baseline at 10 minutes post-A1 block in the HF group (p < 0.05) with no change in the vehicle group. At 10 minutes post-A1 block, urine flow increased sixfold and sodium excretion increased over 10-fold (for both, p < 0.05) with no change in the vehicle group. At 10 minutes post-A1 block, creatinine clearance increased with no change in the vehicle group. At 10 minutes post-A1 block, plasma renin activity had increased over threefold (p <0.05), and it returned to baseline levels by 30 minutes post-A1 block.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique findings from this study were threefold. First, increased A1 receptor activation contributes to renal mediated fluid retention in HF. Second, selective A1 blockade can induce diuresis without hemodynamic compromise and with possible benefit to pulmonary resistance in a model of HF. A1 blockade transiently increased plasma renin activity with no change in hemodynamics. These unique results suggest that selective A1 blockade can be a useful adjunctive diuretic in the setting of HF.