Ultrasound training during ATLS: an early start for surgical interns

Should surgeon-performed intraoperative ultrasound be the preferred test for detecting main pancreatic duct injuries in operative trauma cases?

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic performance of multiple tests for detecting the presence of a main pancreatic duct injury remains poor. Given the central importance of main duct integrity for both subsequent treatment algorithms and patient outcomes, poor test reliability is problematic. The primary aim was to evaluate the comparative test performance of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) for detecting main pancreatic duct injuries.

METHODS

All severely injured adult patients with pancreatic trauma (2010-2021) were evaluated. Patients who received an IOUS pancreas-focused evaluation, with Grades III, IV, and V injuries (main duct injury) were compared with those with Grade I and Grade II trauma (no main duct injury). Test performances were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 248 pancreatic injuries, 74 underwent an IOUS. The additional mix of diagnostic studies (CT, MRCP, ERCP) was variable across grade of injury. Of these 74 IOUS cases for pancreatic injuries, 48 (64.8%) were confirmed as Grades III, IV, or V main duct injuries. The patients were predominantly young (median age = 33, IQR:21-45) blunt injured (70%) males (74%) with severe injury demographics (injury severity score = 28, (IQR:19-36); 30% hemodynamic instability; 91% synchronous intra-abdominal injuries). Thirty-five percent of patients required damage-control surgery. Patient outcomes included a median 13-day hospital length of stay and 1% mortality rate. Test performance was variable across groups (CT = 58% sensitive/77% specific; MRCP = 71% sensitive/100% specific; ERCP = 100% sensitive; IOUS = 98% sensitive/100% specific).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative ultrasound is a highly sensitive and specific test for detecting main pancreatic duct injuries. This technology is simple to learn, readily available, and should be considered in patients who require concurrent non-damage-control abdominal operations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Test/Criteria; Level III.

The use of ultrasound in the acute setting: Lessons learned after 30 years

This article describes the key events in the evolution of the surgeon's use of ultrasound for the evaluation of patients. The lessons learned may be relevant in the future as the issues encountered with the adoption of ultrasound by surgeons may be revisited.

Operating bedside cardiac ultrasound program in emergency medicine residency: A retrospective observation study from the perspective of performance improvement

Background

Point-of-care ultrasound is one of useful diagnostic tools in emergency medicine practice and considerably depends on physician’s performance. This study was performed to evaluate performance improvements and favorable attitudes through structured cardiac ultrasound program for emergency medicine residents.

Methods

Retrospective observational study using the point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) database in one tertiary academic-teaching hospital emergency department has been conducted. Cardiac ultrasound education and rotation program has been implemented in emergency medicine residency program. Structured evaluation sheet for cardiac ultrasound and questionnaire toward PoCUS have been developed. An early-phase and a late-phase case were selected randomly for each participant. Two emergency medicine specialists with expertise in PoCUS evaluated saved images independently. We used a paired t-test to compare the performance score of each phase and the results of the questionnaire. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between the characteristics of participants and performance improvements.

Results

During the study period, a total of 1,652 bedside cardiac ultrasounds were administered. Forty-six examinations conducted by 23 emergency medicine residents were randomly selected for analysis. The performance score increased from 39.5 to 56.1 according to expert A and 45.3 to 62.9 according to expert B (p-value <0.01 for both). The average questionnaire score, which was analyzed for 17 participants, showed improvement from 18.9 to 20.7 (p-value <0.01). In multivariable linear regression analysis, younger age, higher early-phase score and higher confidence had a negative association with a greater improvement of performance, while the number of examinations had a positive association.

Conclusions

Bedside cardiac ultrasound performance and attitudes toward PoCUS have been improved through structured residency program.

The Use of Ultrasonography in the Emergency Department to Screen Patients After Blunt and Penetrating Trauma: A Clinical Update for the Advanced Practice Provider

Use of bedside ultrasonography to identify life-threatening injuries for patients with blunt and penetrating trauma is the standard of care in the emergency department. The "FAST" examination-focused assessment with sonography for trauma-ultrasound scan of the chest and abdomen allows clinicians to assess critical regions for free fluid without use of invasive procedures as quickly and as often as needed. In addition, ultrasonography has a high degree of sensitivity and specificity and is safe during pregnancy. For patients requiring evaluation of the pleura, the "eFAST" (or extended FAST) may be conducted, which may serve to locate pleural effusions, hemothorax, and pneumothorax. However, ultrasound quality is operator dependent and is recommended with other diagnostic measures to provide a complete clinical picture of trauma patients. Ongoing development of ultrasound competency among established clinicians and nurse practitioner students is vital to maintain diagnostic accuracy and ensure quality care for trauma patients in the emergency department.

When is the best time to fix fractures?

The best time to operate on a fracture is governed in part by the nature of the fracture itself. It is also influenced by the premorbid condition of the patient and by the degree that associated injuries have disrupted normal processes. It is likely that some patients have a period of increased physiological risk for intervention, during which a second insult will result in further harm. The picture is not yet fully clear but relates to variations in the inflammatory response to trauma. One consistent lesson appears to resonate throughout the published literature. The most predictable risk factor for iatrogenic physiological disturbance is transfer to the operating theatre before adequate resuscitation of the patient has taken place.

Cost-effectiveness of the Cardiac Component of the Focused Assessment of Sonography in Trauma Examination in Blunt Trauma

BACKGROUND

Blunt cardiac injury severe enough to require surgical intervention (sBCI) is an exceedingly rare event occurring in approximately 1 out of every 1600 trauma patients. While performing the cardiac component of the Focused Assessment of Sonography in Trauma (cFAST) exam is effective in penetrating trauma, it is unclear whether it is of value in blunt trauma given the low prevalence of sBCI, the imperfect test characteristics of the FAST exam, and the rate of incidental pericardial effusion.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine through decision analysis whether performing the cFAST exam is cost-effective in the evaluation of hypotensive and normotensive blunt trauma patients.

METHODS

We created two decision analytic models using commercially available software (TreeAgePro2011) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the cFAST in hypotensive (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) and normotensive blunt trauma patients. Clinical probabilities were obtained from published data. Costs were estimated from Medicare reimbursement and charge data. The willingness-to-pay threshold was $50,000/quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses were performed over plausible ranges using available literature.

RESULTS

In hypotensive patients, for the base case scenario of a 34-year-old with blunt trauma, the cFAST strategy had a cost of $42,882.70 and an effectiveness of 25.3597 QALYs, whereas the no cFAST strategy had a cost of $42,753.52 and an effectiveness of 25.3532 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $19,918/QALY. For normotensive patients the cFAST strategy had a cost of $18,331.03 and an effectiveness of 23.2817 QALYs, whereas the no cFAST strategy had a cost of $18,207.58 and an effectiveness of 23.2814 QALYs. The ICER was $465,867/QALY. In the sensitivity analyses, age, probability of death from sBCI with prompt treatment, and probability of sBCI were the main drivers of variability in the model outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The cFAST for blunt trauma is cost-effective for hypotensive but not for normotensive patients. The ICER for hypotensive patients was more than 20 times higher than the ICER for normotensive patients. Our results suggest that performing the cFAST exam may not be an effective use of resources in normotensive blunt trauma patients.

An Effective Curriculum for Focused Assessment Diagnostic Echocardiography: Establishing the Learning Curve in Surgical Residents

BACKGROUND

Simulation training and competency-based assessment are the evolving standard for surgical education. The Focused Assessment Diagnostic Echocardiography (FADE) examination is a bedside, limited transthoracic ultrasound to assess cardiac function, anatomy, and volume status. FADE can be used to noninvasively evaluate and guide resuscitation of critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the learning curve for surgical residents to perform and interpret the results of the FADE examination using simulation and competency-based assessment.

METHODS

Novice surgical residents were enrolled in a FADE curriculum prospectively. The curriculum involved 4 successive sessions of 45 minutes of simulation followed by 5 FADE examinations on surgical intensive care unit patients. Examination performance was evaluated using a standardized scoresheet (15 points total) and plotted by session. Independent and paired t test and linear regression were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 20 individuals completed 390 FADE examinations. Performance increased from 45 ± 13% accuracy in the first session to 89 ± 9% accuracy in the fourth session (p < 0.001 between all sessions). Accuracy at central venous pressure prediction reached 88% by the final session (p < 0.001). Independent predictors of score included proportion of curriculum completed (odds ratio = 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 2.0-2.3; p < 0.001) and examination of thoracic surgery patients (odds ratio = 0.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.4; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Surgical residents are able to achieve proficiency at performing and interpreting the results of FADE examination and predicting central venous pressure. Residents achieved mastery of evaluation of ventricular function, pericardial assessment, and volume status after 4 training sessions. The ability to teach surgical residents the use of the FADE examination can guide resuscitation without invasive monitoring.

Impact of point-of-care ultrasound training on surgical residents' confidence

OBJECTIVE

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a vital tool for diagnosis and management of critically ill patients, particularly in resource-limited settings where access to diagnostic imaging may be constrained. We aimed to develop a novel POCUS training curriculum for surgical practice in the United States and in resource-limited settings in low- and middle-income countries and to determine its effect on surgical resident self-assessments of efficacy and confidence.

DESIGN

We conducted an observational cohort study evaluating a POCUS training course that comprised 7 sessions of 2 hours each with didactics and proctored skills stations covering ultrasound applications for trauma (Focused Assessement with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination), obstetrics, vascular, soft tissue, regional anesthesia, focused echocardiography, and ultrasound guidance for procedures. Surveys on attitudes, prior experience, and confidence in point-of-care ultrasound applications were conducted before and after the course.

SETTING

General Surgery Training Program in Seattle, Washington.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 16 residents participated in the course; 15 and 10 residents completed the precourse and postcourse surveys, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean composite confidence score from pretest compared with posttest improved from 23.3 (±10.2) to 37.8 (±6.7). Median confidence scores (1-6 scale) improved from 1.5 to 5.0 in performance of FAST (p < 0.001). Residents reported greater confidence in their ability to identify pericardial (2 to 4, p = 0.009) and peritoneal fluid (2 to 4.5, p < 0.001), to use ultrasound to guide procedures (3.5 to 4.0, p = 0.008), and to estimate ejection fraction (1 to 4, p = 0.004). Both before and after training, surgical residents overwhelmingly agreed with statements that ultrasound would improve their US-based practice, make them a better surgical resident, and improve their practice in resource-limited settings.

CONCLUSIONS

After a POCUS course designed specifically for surgeons, surgical residents had improved self-efficacy and confidence levels across a broad range of skills.

Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) training: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to systematically review the different methods for training Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST), course design, and requirements for hospital credentialing.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database and performed a manual search of selected papers. All papers and abstracts written in English that studied training and education of FAST were included. Papers were critically evaluated, looking into training methods and models of FAST, their advantages and disadvantages, number and type of training hours, practice exams in the course, and number of cases advised to achieve hospital credentialing.

RESULTS

A total of 52 studies were critically analyzed. The theoretical part of the courses lasted over a median (range) of 4 (1-16) h (n = 35 studies), while the practical part lasted over a median (range) of 4 (1-32) h (n = 34 studies). The participants performed a median (range) of 10 (3-20) FAST exams during the courses (n = 13 studies). The most commonly used model was the normal human model (65 %), followed by peritoneal dialysis patients (27 %). The least used models were animal (4 %) and cadaveric models (2 %). Each of these models had their advantages and disadvantages. The median number (range) of FAST exams needed for credentialing was 50 (10-200) (n = 19 studies).

CONCLUSION

Standardization of FAST training is important to improving the clinical impact of FAST. Different models used in FAST training are complementary; each has its own advantages and disadvantages. It is recommended that FAST courses be at least 2 days (16 h) long. The first day should include 4 h of theory and 4 h of training on normal human models. The second day should enforce learning using animal models, case scenarios including video clips, or simulators.

Clinician-performed Beside Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Traumatic Pneumothorax

Introduction:

Prior studies have reported conflicting results regarding the utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax (PTX) because they have used sonologists with extensive experience. This study evaluates the characteristics of ultrasound for PTX for a large cohort of trauma and emergency physicians.

Methods:

This was a prospective, observational study on a convenience sample of patients presenting to a trauma center who had a thoracic ultrasound (TUS) evaluation for PTX performed after the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma exam. Sonologists recorded their findings prior to any other diagnostic studies. The results of TUS were compared to one or more of the following: chest computed tomography, escape of air on chest tube insertion, or supine chest radiography followed by clinical observation.

Results:

There were 549 patients enrolled. The median injury severity score of the patients was 5 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 1–14); 36 different sonologists performed TUS. Forty-seven of the 549 patients had traumatic PTX, for an incidence of 9%. TUS correctly identified 27/47 patients with PTX for a sensitivity of 57% (confidence interval [CI] 42–72%). There were 3 false positive cases of TUS for a specificity of 99% (CI 98%–100%). A “wet” chest radiograph reading done in the trauma bay showed a sensitivity of 40% (CI 23–59) and a specificity of 100% (99–100).

Conclusion:

In a large heterogenous group of clinicians who typically care for trauma patients, the sonographic evaluation for pneumothorax was as accurate as supine chest radiography. Thoracic ultrasound may be helpful in the initial evaluation of patients with truncal trauma.

Beyond focused assessment with sonography for trauma: ultrasound creep in the trauma resuscitation area and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of ultrasound for the management of the injured patient has expanded dramatically in the last decade. The focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) has become one of the fundamental skills incorporated into the initial evaluation of the trauma patient. However, there are significant limitations of this diagnostic modality as initially described. Novel ultrasound examinations of the injured patient, although useful, must also be considered carefully.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing evidence supports the high specificity of FAST for detecting a pericardial effusion and intra-abdominal free fluid (hemorrhage) in the patient with blunt injury. On the other hand, a so-called negative FAST result still requires further diagnostic work up given its low sensitivity. Similarly, the role of FAST in penetrating abdominal trauma appears to be limited because of lower sensitivity for visceral injury compared to other modalities. Extended FAST (EFAST), that adds a focused thoracic examination, has high accuracy for the detection of pneumothorax comparable to computed tomographic scan, the significance of which is not currently known. Finally, the utility of intensivist-performed ultrasound in the ICU is expanding to limited hemodynamic assessment and facilitation of central venous catheter placement.

SUMMARY

The indications for FAST and additional ultrasound studies in the injured patient continue to evolve. Application of sound clinical evidence will avoid unsubstantiated indications for ultrasound to creep into our clinical practice.

Mid-level providers demonstrate proficiency in FAST after directed training

Introduction

Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is commonly used to detect intra-peritoneal blood as part of the evaluation of trauma patients. In our level 1 trauma center, mid-level providers (MLPs) perform serial FAST exams on trauma patients. We describe our training approach and proficiency achieved.

Methods

Subjects were MLPs with no previous training in FAST. The training consisted of hands-on training on live models, two on-line ultrasound (US) modules, and a video image review session. Participants were evaluated with pre-, post-, and 6-month follow-up video tests. Subsequently, they independently performed FAST exams which were reviewed by ED US faculty.

Results

11 MLPs participated, completing an average of 17 scans; 91% were technically adequate. Average scores were: pre-test 50.5% (31.7–68.3%), post-test 76.7% (65.9–87.8%), and 6-month test 77% (58.5–87.8%), for an initial improvement of 26.2% (p < 0.001) and a sustained improvement over the pre-test of 26.5% (p = 0.011) at 6 months.

Conclusion

MLPs demonstrated proficiency in FAST after brief training.

FACTS survey: focused assessment with sonography in trauma use among Canadian residents training in general surgery

BACKGROUND

A survey of all Canadian residents training in general surgery was conducted to determine the prevalence and nature of focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) training.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of all 549 residents in 16 Canadian general surgery programs was administered using the Tailored Design Method between December 2008 and February 2009.

RESULTS

With a response rate of 58.5% (321 of 549), the prevalence of FAST training among Canadian residents was 21.2% (95% confidence interval: 17.2-25.2). The median number of practice and patient examinations completed was 5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-10.5) and 11.5 (IQR: 1.75-50), respectively. Only 38.8% of residents with training felt comfortable making treatment decisions based on their FAST examinations. Those residents who were comfortable had completed more practice and patient examinations (median, 12.5 vs. 4, p = 0.001 and 30 vs. 4.5, p ≤ 0.001, respectively) and were less likely to have didactic only training (7.7% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.002). Most residents (80%) indicated that they would need 20 practice examinations or more (median, 30 examinations; IQR, 20-40) before they would feel comfortable. Residents with FAST training were more likely to be from a program that offered FAST training (54.5% vs. 10%, p ≤ 0.001) and were less likely to perceive a turf war with other specialties over FAST use (29.9% vs. 48.2%, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The situation with FAST training in Canada seems inadequate with few general surgery residents being trained, and of those trained, only a few are comfortable with the technique. If FAST skills are to be expected of future surgeons, initiatives must be put in place to address barriers and improve training opportunities.

Perceived confidence in the FAST exam before and after an educational intervention in a developing country

Background

Trauma care in developing countries suffers from many limitations related to equipment shortages, disrepair, quality assurance, and lack of training. Health care providers in the three principal hospitals in Cusco, Peru have ultrasound machines, but they do not utilize this for the focused assessment of sonography in trauma (FAST) scan (only one of the three hospitals has a computed tomography scanner).

Aims

The goal of this study was to assess the confidence of physicians in a developing country to conduct a FAST exam after an educational intervention.

Methods

Participants were Peruvian health care workers who attended a 2-day conference on trauma. Participants completed a questionnaire based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = no confidence, 5 = high confidence) to assess comfort with the FAST scan before and after a FAST teaching workshop, which included hands-on ultrasound training. Thirteen individuals, eight of whom were physicians, completed the training and survey. Results were analyzed using paired t test statistics and are reported as pre- and post-training mean scores (± standard error), with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Participants rated their confidence in using the FAST exam on a trauma patient with an average score of 3.3 (± 0.3) pre-training and 4.5 (± 0.2) post-training (p = 0.007). When asked about their comfort level in making clinical decisions based on the FAST scan, pre-training average score was 3.5 (± 0.4) and post-training was 4.5 (± 0.2), p = 0.016. Participants also answered questions about their comfort with the technical aspects of using the ultrasound machine: ability to choose the correct probe (pre: 3.9, post: 4.6, p = 0.011), choosing the correct probe orientation (pre: 3.9, post: 4.6, p = 0.008), and adjusting the depth and gain (pre: 3.1, post: 4.4, p = 0.001). Finally, participants rated their comfort with the specific views of the FAST scan: ability to find the correct subcostal view (pre: 3.3, post: 4.9, p < 0.001), right upper quadrant view (pre: 3.2, post: 4.6, p < 0.001), left upper quadrant view (pre: 3.2, post: 4.4, p = 0.001), and the pelvic view (pre: 3.2, post: 4.5, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

After a training session in the use of ultrasound in trauma, health care workers in Cusco, Peru reported increased confidence in their FAST scan ability and in their comfort in using this exam for clinical decision-making. Future research should include objective testing of participants’ skill as well as longitudinal follow-up to determine the extent to which the FAST scan has been incorporated into participants’ evaluations of trauma patients.

Teaching trauma care in India: an educational pilot study from Bangalore

BACKGROUND

Trauma has become a major cause of death and disability in developing countries. In India, most trauma patients receive initial care at general practitioner-staffed hospitals. We hypothesize that general practitioners (GPs) could improve their knowledge of trauma care after attending an educational course.

METHODS

A 2-day trauma course was conducted at a teaching hospital (170 bed) in Bangalore, India. Referral GPs, local surgeons and residents in training attended. A pre-course test was given to assess baseline trauma knowledge. The core didactic sessions included: resuscitation/recognition of shock states, airway prioritization, and evaluation/initial management of head, cardiothoracic, abdominal, pelvic/genitourinary, and thermal injuries. A post-course test was used to assess trauma knowledge obtained from the course. Paired t tests were performed on the test scores and demographic data were stratified by specialty and training status.

RESULTS

Of the 44 participants, 32 (72%) met study inclusion criteria: MBBS degree and course completion. The study population was 62.5% male with 47% surgeons and 53% GPs. Residents were 71.8% of the entire group. Overall, the pre- and post- course scores improved from 70.7% +/-11.2 to 87.5% +/-8.9, P = 0.000 (95%CI 12.1, 21.2). There was an increase of mean scores: 21.4% (SD +/-13.7) for GPs and 11.3% (SD +/-8.5) for surgeons (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Although GPs had significantly lower pre-course scores than surgeons, at the end of the course, GPs performed as well as surgeons. These findings suggest allocation of limited educational resources for trauma care in India may be best used by GPs.

An evaluation of the American College of Surgeons’ ultrasound education program

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound has a wide variety of applications in surgery, but until recently few surgeons received any formal training in its use. To facilitate incorporation of ultrasound into surgical practice, the American College of Surgeons (ACoS) developed an ultrasound educational program. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact and effectiveness of the ACoS ultrasound education program.

METHODS

A survey was mailed to all surgeons who had completed at least one of several ultrasound courses offered by the ACoS from 1998 to 2002.

RESULTS

A total of 1,791 surveys were mailed out and 873 completed surveys were returned. Sixty-five percent (576) of respondents reported using ultrasound in their practices after these educational courses. Of those performing ultrasound examinations, 267 did so in one clinical area and 309 in more than one. The most common examination was breast (369 surgeons); vascular, acute/trauma, abdominal, intraoperative/laparoscopic, and head/neck were utilized fairly equally (100-200 surgeons). The number of examinations performed by surgeons before they felt competent was between 11 and 20 and did not vary by the type of ultrasound examination. Of the 267 surgeons performing ultrasound in one clinical area, 176 performed ultrasound-guided procedures. Most surgeons had access to 2 ultrasound machines, but 386 (67%) were restricted from performing ultrasound in certain locations.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACoS ultrasound courses are extremely popular and have contributed to the increasing use of ultrasound in surgical practice. Surgeons successfully use ultrasound in their practices including performance of ultrasound-guided procedures but are restricted from using ultrasound in certain patient care areas. Since many surgeons received prior and/or additional training outside of the ACoS, there is a need to facilitate export of ACoS courses to other venues and to focus on incorporating ultrasound training into surgical residency programs.

Fascial Ultrasound for Evaluation of Anterior Abdominal Stab Wound Injury

BACKGROUND

Local stab wound (SW) exploration to assess abdominal fascial integrity is a highly invasive procedure frequently performed under demanding circumstances in the Emergency Department (ED). We hypothesized ultrasound (U/S) may be useful in the detection of fascial defects resulting from anterior abdominal stab injury, eliminating the need for local wound exploration

METHODS

Thirty-five hemodynamically normal patients evaluated at a Level I trauma center for anterior abdominal stab wounds were examined by U/S (8 mHz probe) for evidence of fascial violation. All patients were subsequently evaluated by local wound exploration

RESULTS

Fascial U/S had an overall sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 100%, (PPV 100%, NPV 59%) for detection of fascial SW defects compared with local wound exploration. The sensitivity of fascial U/S for stab wound evaluation varied directly with experience of the sonographer

CONCLUSIONS

A positive fascial U/S obviates the need for invasive SW exploration; however, a negative fascial U/S does not preclude the need for local wound exploration. Resident U/S training for specific penetrating injuries may reduce the need for abdominal SW fascial exploration in the ED.

Early Diagnosis of Hypovolemic Shock by Sonographic Measurement of Inferior Vena Cava in Trauma Patients

BACKGROUND

The diameter of the inferior vena cava in trauma patients may be useful for evaluating hypovolemia.

METHODS

Between June 2003 and September 2003, 35 injured patients transferred to the authors' hospital were prospectively investigated. They were divided into two groups: a shock group (n = 10) and a control group (n = 25). The maximum anteroposterior diameter of the inferior vena cava was measured using a sonography at arrival and on hospital day 5.

RESULTS

The average diameter of the inferior vena cava in the shock group was significantly smaller than in the control group. There was no significant change in the diameter of the inferior vena cava in the control group, but significant change was seen in the shock group between arrival and hospital day 5.

CONCLUSION

The diameter of the inferior vena cava was found to correlate with hypovolemia in trauma patients.

Evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: current practice in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

To gain an overview of the current practice of different major institutions in Taiwan in the evaluation of abdominal injuries. A further comparison was made between general surgeons and emergency physicians in this aspect.

METHOD

A telephone survey was conducted of all emergency departments of 58 major institutions (14 medical centres, 44 district hospitals) that are capable of providing definitive care for trauma victims in Taiwan in June 2002. Respondents were asked to select the diagnostic modality of choice in the evaluation of a haemodynamically abnormal blunt trauma victim with suspected intra-abdominal injuries. In the same study period, this particular telephone scenario was also used to survey 109 individual doctors (45 emergency physicians, 64 general surgeons).

RESULTS

Most respondents preferred ultrasound (also known as focused assessment with sonography for trauma or "FAST") instead of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) because DPL is invasive and most doctors in Taiwan have limited experience in performing DPL or interpreting the results.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems reasonable to devote greater resources for emergency departments to incorporate a FAST based algorithm into their initial management of trauma victims, and to improve training in its use. It is also suggested that future ATLS teaching in Taiwan should include didactic material on FAST.

Basic ultrasound curriculum for medical students: validation of content and phantom

Effective use of ultrasound requires an understanding of the physics, combined with the ability to interpret the sonographic images. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of a basic ultrasound curriculum using a phantom to train medical students. Twenty-eight first- to fourth-year medical students were randomized to two groups: a control group that received no formal training and a trained group that received basic ultrasound training. Both groups took an initial multiple-choice written test and an ultrasound hands-on test using an agarose-based tissue mimic containing various objects. The curriculum for the trained group consisted of reading the principles of ultrasound and a hands-on session over the phantom. After training, both groups underwent a second multiple-choice exam and ultrasound practical test. The initial and the post-training test results were analyzed using a two-tailed Student's t-test. Baseline written and practical test scores were similar for both groups. After training, written test scores improved (82% trained vs. 66% control, P < 0.001). Hands-on ultrasound task performance also improved with training (96% trained vs. 60% control, P <0.001). The trained group took a shorter time to obtain a clear image and found on average one more object per scan. Parameters such as time to obtain a useful image and number of objects recognized also improved with training. Basic sonographic physics, imaging, and interpretation can be effectively taught to medical students during a short training session.

Establishment of a teaching animal model for sonographic diagnosis of trauma

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is widely accepted as a valuable diagnostic tool for detecting intra-abdominal and intrathoracic bleeding in trauma patients. Nevertheless, many doctors are reluctant to use it because they do not have sufficient training. This study aimed to define intra-abdominal and intrathoracic fluid volumes that can be detected by sonography and their relation to fluid width in pigs to establish a clinically relevant animal model for teaching and training.

METHODS

Different volumes of normal saline were infused into the abdomen (50-2,000 mL) and chest (25-250 mL) in five anesthetized pigs. The maximum width of fluid as detected by ultrasound was recorded. The right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant, pelvis, and right paracolic section of the abdomen and right pleural cavity were studied. An experienced radiologist performed the studies. The effects on respiratory and cardiovascular functions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The sonographic findings in the pig were similar to those in humans. Up to 50 mL of intra-abdominal fluid and up to 25 mL of intrathoracic fluid could be detected by ultrasound. There was a significant correlation between the volume infused and the fluid width detected. The respiratory and cardiovascular monitoring of the animals showed that the infused intrathoracic volumes mimicked a survivable hemothorax.

CONCLUSION

The pig may serve as an excellent clinically relevant model with which to teach surgeons detection of different volumes of intra-abdominal and intrathoracic fluids. The value of this model as an educational tool has yet to be tested.

Significant hemoperitoneum in blunt trauma victims with normal vital signs and clinical examination

Clinical examination of the abdomen is generally reliable in stable trauma patients with no distracting or head injury. Patients involved in relatively minor trauma with normal examinations can be safely sent home in most instances. We report 6 cases of blunt abdominal trauma that had completely normal clinical examinations and vital signs but were found to have significant hemoperitoneum on trauma ultrasound examination. Four of the patients were examined for educational purposes just before planned discharge from the emergency department. These cases suggest that a screening ultrasound examination may have a role in the evaluation of most blunt trauma patients.

Senior Surgical Residents Can Accurately Interpret Trauma Radiographs

Surgical residents routinely interpret radiographic studies during the evaluation of trauma patients, which directs further evaluation and invasive procedures. Official interpretations—“post-reading”—of radiographs by radiologists may be delayed by hours or even days. Trauma surgeons frequently act on their impressions before “official” readings are available. It has been demonstrated that surgical residents can accurately perform and interpret trauma ultrasound examinations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of senior surgery residents to interpret basic trauma radiographs. Interpretations of trauma radiographs (cervical spine, chest, pelvis, and CT of the brain) were recorded prospectively by the senior surgery resident present during trauma evaluations. These interpretations were compared with the findings of the radiologist as obtained from the official radiology report. Differing results were divided into clinically significant and clinically nonsignificant findings using defined criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were determined. Interpretations of trauma radiographs by senior residents achieved an accuracy of 100 per cent for cervical spine radiographs, 95.9 per cent for chest radiographs, 98.0 per cent for pelvis radiographs, and 97.9 per cent for CT of the head. In aggregate senior residents interpreted trauma radiographs with 97.9 per cent accuracy. Differences that were considered clinically significant according to preset criteria occurred in 2.1 per cent of observations. We conclude that senior general surgical residents can accurately interpret trauma radiology, including CT of the brain. These results suggest that institutional policies for post-reading of trauma radiology should be reassessed.

Triage in the trauma bay with the focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examination

Bedside ultrasonography has been applied to the evaluation of blunt trauma patients for over a decade. The Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (FAST) examination has been used to successfully triage blunt trauma patients. Although not traditionally thought to be as useful in penetrating trauma patients, ultrasound can help determine the extent of injury especially of the heart. We present two cases of multiple-stabbing victims who arrived at our Level I trauma center at the same time, when our trauma system was particularly overburdened by multiple consecutive traumas. The FAST examination helped us to accurately determine which of the two patients required operative intervention first, despite that patient's appearance of relative hemodynamic stability in comparison to the other stabbing victim.

Defining the Learning Curve for the Focused Abdominal Sonogram for Trauma (FAST) Examination: Implications for Credentialing

Focused Abdominal Sonogram for Trauma (FAST) examination is being used increasingly for the torso evaluation of injured patients. In a controlled setting using peritoneal dialysis patients as models for injured patients with free fluid we hypothesized that more experienced providers would perform FAST with greater accuracy. Twelve fellow or attending level trauma surgeons, two radiologists, and one ultrasound technician were studied for their ability to detect intraperitoneal fluid (0–1600 cm3) in nine peritoneal dialysis patients with two different volumes of dialysate/patient. FAST experience with injured patients was defined as minimal (<30 patients examinations), moderate (30–100), or extensive (>100). All surgeons had participated in a didactic/practical course before the study. Test results were reported as “+” or “-” by the participant; “+” results were further quantified by volume. The sensitivity of those in the minimal-, moderate-, and extensive-experience to detect <1 L was 45, 87, and 100 per cent, respectively; the accuracy in detecting dialysate volume within 250 cm3 was 38, 63, and 90 per cent, respectively. In this controlled setting the accuracy of FAST particularly in diagnosing smaller volumes, as well as the ability to quantify volume, improves with experience. The learning curve for FAST starts to flatten out at 30 to 100 examinations. Training and credentialing policies should consider these findings to optimize patient care.

Surgeon-performed ultrasound imaging in acute surgical disorders

As the role of the general surgeon continues to evolve, the surgeon's use of ultrasound imaging will surely influence practice patterns, particularly for the evaluation of patients in the acute setting. With the use of real-time imaging, the surgeon receives "instantaneous" information to augment the physical examination, to narrow the differential diagnosis, or to initiate an intervention. With select ultrasound examinations, the surgeon can rapidly evaluate adult and pediatric patients with an acute abdomen, especially those patients who are hypotensive. In the hands of the surgeon, this noninvasive, bedside tool can assess more accurately the presence, depth, and extent of an abscess, confirm complete aspiration, or diagnose wound dehiscence before it is apparent on physical examination. Ultrasound imaging is so accurate for the diagnosis of pyloric stenosis that it has essentially replaced the upper gastrointestinal series in most institutions. The surgeon's use of ultrasound imaging to detect a pleural effusion has virtually supplanted the lateral decubitus radiograph. Furthermore, an ultrasound-guided thoracentesis not only facilitates the procedure but improves its safety. As surgeons become more facile with ultrasound imaging, it is anticipated that other uses will develop to further enhance its value for the assessment of patients in the acute setting.

Physician training requirements in sonography: how many cases are needed for competence?

OBJECTIVE

Physician competence in the performance of sonographic studies was assessed after their involvement in predetermined increments of cases to determine whether the case volumes currently required by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and the American College of Radiology for training in sonography can be lowered substantially.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sonographic competence tests were administered to 10 first-year diagnostic radiology residents after their involvement in increments of 50 cases, up to a total of 200 cases (four competency tests). Each competency test consisted of the resident's independently scanning and interpreting 10 clinically mandated studies that were scored in comparison with the examination performed by the sonographer and interpreted by an attending radiologist. Trainee studies were graded on the percentage of anatomic landmarks depicted, the number of reporting errors, the number of clinically significant reporting errors, and the percentage of cases receiving a passing score.

RESULTS

Although resident performance improved progressively with increasing experience for all parameters assessed, performance of the group was poor even after their involvement in 200 cases. At this testing level, the mean percentage of anatomic landmarks depicted successfully was 56.5%; the mean total reporting errors per case was 1.2; the mean clinically significant errors per case was 0.5; and the mean percentage of cases receiving a passing score was 16%. Impressive performance differences were observed among residents for all parameters assessed, and these differences were not explained by the number of months of radiology training the resident had taken before the sonography rotation.

CONCLUSION

Involvement in 200 or fewer cases during the training period is not sufficient for physicians to develop an acceptable level of competence in sonography.

Training residents using simulation technology: experience with ultrasound for trauma

BACKGROUND

The need for surgeons to become proficient in performing and interpreting ultrasound examinations has been well recognized in recent years, but providing standardized training remains a significant challenge. The UltraSim (MedSim, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla) ultrasound simulator is a modified ultrasound machine that stores patient data in three-dimensional images. By scanning on the UltraSim mannequin, the student can reconstruct these images in real-time, eliminating the need for finding normal and abnormal models, while providing an objective method of both teaching and testing. The objective of this study was to compare the posttest results between residents trained on a real-time ultrasound simulator versus those trained in a traditional hands-on patient format. We hypothesized that both methods of teaching would yield similar results as judged by performance on the interpretive portion of a standardized posttest. It is designed as a prospective, cohort study from two university trauma centers involving residents at the beginning of their first or second postgraduate year of training. The main outcome measure was performance on a standardized posttest, which included interpretation of ultrasound cases recorded on videotape.

METHODS

Students first took a written pretest to evaluate their baseline knowledge of ultrasound physics as well as their ability to interpret basic ultrasound images. The didactic portion of the course used the same teaching materials for all residents and included lectures on ultrasound physics, ultrasound use in trauma/critical care, and a series of instructional videos. This didactic session was followed by 1 hour for each student of hands-on training on medical models/medical patients (group I) or by training on the ultrasound simulator (group II). The pretest was repeated at the completion of the course (posttest). Data were stratified by postgraduate year, i.e., PG1 or PG2.

RESULTS

A total of 74 residents were trained and tested in this study (PG1 = 48, PG2 = 26). All residents showed significant improvement in their pretest and posttest scores (p = 0.00) in both their knowledge of ultrasound physics and in their interpretation of ultrasound images. Importantly, we could not demonstrate any significant difference between groups trained on models/patients (group I) versus those trained on the simulator (group II) when comparing their posttest interpretation of ultrasound images presented on videotapes (PG1, group I mean score 6.9 +/- 1.4 vs. PG1, group II mean score 6.5 +/- 1.6, p = 0.32; PG2, group I mean score 7.7 +/- 1.4 vs. PG2, group II mean score 7.9 +/- 1.2, p = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

The use of a simulator is a convenient and objective method of introducing ultrasound to surgery residents and compares favorably with the experience gained with traditional hands-on patient models.

The focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examination: considerations and recommendations for training physicians in the use of a new clinical tool

Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) is being used by growing numbers of emergency physicians and surgeons because it has proven to be an accurate, rapid, and repeatable bedside test for evaluating abdominal trauma victims. Controversy exists about the optimal means of FAST education and the number of examinations necessary to demonstrate competency. Most FAST educators agree that FAST education should consist of three phases: didactic, practical, and experiential. This article summarizes options and preliminary recommendations suitable for developing a FAST curriculum.

Sonographic assessment of traumatic injury. Future developments

In all its forms and applications, sonography plays a significant role in the management of injured patients, from the emergency department to beyond hospital discharge. The use of new and existing sonographic technology will increase because sonographic imaging and measurements are generally less invasive; are inexpensive; use no ionizing radiation; and are portable, repeatable, and, in many instances, as accurate as the so-called "contemporary gold standards." The training and credentialing of physicians in sonography is in evolution and will be an increasingly important issue with more widespread use and broader applications. The future of sonography in trauma care in the next millennium is bright, and surgeons and surgical residents are encouraged to gain proficiency and learn about this new surgical frontier as it evolves.

Use of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) for the assessment of physician performance in the ultrasound evaluation of trauma

BACKGROUND

A reliable means of assessing physician competency in performing ultrasound (US) is critical for training and credentialing. Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) have been used successfully to assess clinical competency in other areas of surgical education but have not been applied previously to trauma ultrasound training. The objectives of this study were to assess physician performance in the focused abdominal sonography in trauma (FAST) examination by using a specifically designed OSCE, and to determine whether the OSCE detects differences in two determinants of competency (knowledge acquisition and clinical interpretation skills).

METHODS

Eighty-two physicians in surgery (n = 49) and emergency medicine (n = 33) at a Level I trauma center were evaluated. All participated in a FAST course consisting of didactic sessions on US physics, indications, and technique, FAST examination videos, and a hands-on session with human models. The OSCE consisted of two parts: written examination that assessed factual knowledge, and videotape of real-time US examinations that assessed interpretation skills. The OSCE was administered before and after the FAST course.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in postcourse OSCE scores were observed for factual knowledge (52.5 +/- 2.0 vs. 87.5 +/- 1.1, p < 0.001) and interpretation skills (27.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 62.9 +/- 1.3, p < 0.007). Scores for US interpretation were significantly lower than those for factual knowledge at both precourse (27.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 52.5 - 2.0, p < 0.001) and postcourse (62.9 +/- 1.3 vs. 87.5 +/- 1.1, p < 0.01). No performance differences were observed between surgeons and emergency medicine physicians and no effect of training level on test scores was observed.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge acquisition and US interpretation skills can be assessed reliably with a specifically designed OSCE. Although both skills improved after participation in a FAST course, US interpretation scores were consistently lower than those for factual knowledge. This study supports the use of the objective structured clinical examination in both the design of ultrasound teaching programs and the assessment of physician competency.

The role of ultrasound in patients with possible penetrating cardiac wounds: a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is quickly becoming part of the trauma surgeon's practice, but its role in the patient with a penetrating truncal injury is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of emergency ultrasound as it was introduced into five Level I trauma centers for the diagnosis of acute hemopericardium.

METHODS

Surgeons or cardiologists (four centers) and technicians (one center) performed pericardial ultrasound examinations on patients with penetrating truncal wounds. By protocol, patients with positive examinations underwent immediate operation. Vital signs, base deficit, time from examination to operation, operative findings, treatment, and outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

Pericardial ultrasound examinations were performed in 261 patients. There were 225 (86.2%) true-negative, 29 (11.1%) true-positive, 0 false-negative, and 7 (2.7%) false-positive examinations, resulting in sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 96.9%, and accuracy of 97.3%. The mean time from ultrasound to operation was 12.1+/-5 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound should be the initial modality for the evaluation of patients with penetrating precordial wounds because it is accurate and rapid.

Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference

OBJECTIVE

To assemble an international panel of experts to develop consensus recommendations on selected important issues on the use of ultrasonography (US) in trauma care.

SETTING

R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Md. The conference was held on December 4, 1997.

PARTICIPANTS

A committee of two co-directors and eight faculty members, in the disciplines of surgery and emergency medicine, representing four nations. Each faculty member had made significant contributions to the current understanding of US in trauma.

RESULTS

Six broad topics felt to be controversial or to have wide variation in practice were discussed using the ad hoc process: (1) US nomenclature and technique; (2) US for organ-specific injury; (3) US scoring systems; (4) the meaning of positive and negative US studies; (5) US credentialing issues; and (6) future applications of US. Consensus recommendations were made when unanimous agreement was reached. Majority viewpoints and minority opinions are presented for unresolved issues.

CONCLUSION

The consensus conference process fostered an international sharing of ideas. Continued communication is needed to advance the science and technology of US in trauma care.

Surgeon-performed ultrasound: its use in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To highlight areas where surgeon-performed ultrasound (US) is an effective diagnostic and therapeutic tool.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The success of US in trauma and technologic advances have enhanced the interest and ability of surgeons to perform their own US examinations.

METHODS

General surgeons perform US examinations of the thyroid gland, breast, gastrointestinal tract, peritoneal cavity (laparoscopy), and vascular system. Essentials of these examinations are discussed and a plan for educating surgical residents in US is outlined.

RESULTS

Focused assessment for the sonographic examination of the trauma patient, or FAST, is replacing central venous pressure measurements to detect hemopericardium and diagnostic peritoneal lavage to detect hemoperitoneum. Bedside US can be used to detect a pleural effusion so well in critically ill patients that lateral decubitus x-rays are rarely needed. US-directed biopsy of breast lesions is a common office procedure. Laparoscopic US allows tumor staging without formal celiotomy, and many hepatic and pancreatic surgical procedures include US as an adjunct. Endoscopic and endorectal US have added a new dimension to the assessment of many gastrointestinal lesions. Color flow duplex imaging and endoluminal US have significantly expanded the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of vascular imaging. The training program developed at Emory University and Grady Memorial Hospital is offered as a model for educating surgical residents in US techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

US is a valuable addition to the general surgeon's diagnostic armamentarium and is rapidly becoming an integral part of the surgeon's clinical practice.

Swine and dynamic ultrasound models for trauma ultrasound testing of surgical residents

BACKGROUND

Trauma ultrasound workshops have been recommended for training surgical residents. We assessed the teaching effectiveness of the workshop, comparing swine and dynamic patient ultrasound models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MCQ exams on ultrasound physics and practical skills tests with and without pericardial or peritoneal fluid using four swines and eight dynamic patient ultrasound videos were used to compare pre- and postworkshop performance in 18 surgical residents (Group I) and a matched control group of 18 (Group II). Paired t tests and unpaired t tests for paired and unpaired data, respectively, were used for analysis with a P < 0.05 being considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Mean scores (% correct response) +/- SD were as follows (*P < 0.05 vs Group I). [table: see text] For the swine model, the best scores were with pericardial fluid (25.0% pre vs 69.4% post in Group I) and the worst scores were with RUQ fluid (5.6% pre vs 22.2% post in Group I). Postworkshop dynamic video scores were always higher than the swine model scores in Group I (100% correct video scores for pericardial fluid).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the trauma ultrasound workshop teaching effectiveness. For testing, the swine model (especially RUQ) was more difficult. In postcourse evaluation, the dynamic human video was considered more relevant, realistic, and less costly for repeated testing of the residents.

Can surgeons evaluate emergency ultrasound scans for blunt abdominal trauma?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether surgeons and residents with minimal training can evaluate accurately emergency ultrasound (US) examinations compared with radiologists for blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

Over 7 months, we conducted a prospective study comparing the evaluation of emergency US for blunt abdominal trauma by surgeons and attending radiologists. US readings from the surgical team and the radiologists were correlated with outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred-twelve patients were included in the study. Ninety-two patients had an US read as negative by the surgical and radiology services with no subsequent injuries identified. Eighteen patients had an US deemed positive by the surgical service and radiologists. Injuries were confirmed in this group by operation or computed tomography. One patient had an US deemed positive by the surgical team and subsequently negative by the radiologist. A diagnostic peritoneal lavage was performed which was negative. Another patient had an US interpreted as negative by the surgical evaluator and positive by the radiologist. Exploratory laparotomy was negative for intraabdominal hemorrhage or organ injury. Overall results reveal an accuracy on US reading of 99% for the surgical team and 99% for the attending radiologists.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons and surgical residents at different levels of training can accurately interpret emergency ultrasound examinations for blunt trauma from the real-time images, at a level comparable to attending radiologists.

Rapid detection of traumatic effusion using surgeon-performed ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

In the injured patient, rapid assessment of the thorax can yield critical information for patient management and triage.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this prospective study were (1) to determine if experienced surgeon sonographers could successfully use a focused thoracic ultrasonographic examination to detect traumatic effusion, and (2) to compare the accuracy and efficiency of ultrasonography with supine portable chest radiography.

METHODS

Surgeon-sonographers performed thoracic ultrasonographic examinations on patients with blunt and penetrating torso injuries during the Advanced Trauma Life Support secondary survey. All patients also underwent portable chest radiography. Performance times for ultrasonography and chest radiography were recorded. Comparisons were made of the performance times and accuracy of both tests in detecting traumatic effusion.

RESULTS

In 360 patients, there were 40 effusions, 39 of which were detected by ultrasonography and 37 of which were detected by chest radiography. The 97.5% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity observed for thoracic ultrasonography were similar to the 92.5% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity for portable chest radiography. Performance time for ultrasonography was significantly faster than that for chest radiography (1.30 +/- 0.08 vs. 14.18 +/- 0.91 minutes, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Surgeons can accurately perform and interpret a focused thoracic ultrasonographic examination to detect traumatic effusion. Surgeon-performed thoracic ultrasonography is as accurate but is significantly faster than supine portable chest radiography for the detection of traumatic effusion.

Validation of surgeon-performed emergency abdominal ultrasonography in pediatric trauma patients

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The focused assessment for the sonographic evaluation of trauma patients (FAST) in adults is effective in detecting intraperitoneal and intrapericardial fluid and can be performed quickly by surgeons in the emergency department (ED). The authors sought to validate the accuracy of FAST performed by surgeons during ED resuscitation of pediatric trauma patients.

METHODS

Patients were assigned to one of three groups based on standard clinical criteria: immediate surgery, abdominal computed tomography (CT), or observation alone. FAST was then performed in the ED by a surgery resident (postgraduate year 3 or higher) or an attending trauma surgeon. Four views were used to assess the possible presence of fluid in the pericardial, subphrenic, subhepatic, and pelvic spaces. Time needed to conduct FAST was noted. Presence of peritoneal or pericardial fluid by FAST was compared with that determined by CT or surgery. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. For those who did not undergo CT or surgery, FAST findings were compared with the clinical course.

RESULTS

Technically adequate studies could be performed on 192 of 196 eligible children. Their ages ranged from 3 months to 14 years (mean, 6.9 years); 119 were boys (62%), and 188 (98%) had sustained a blunt injury. FAST was performed in a mean time of 3.9 minutes (range, 1-17 minutes). All FAST examinations were reviewed by our senior surgeon-sonographer (GSR). Interrater agreement between the performing and reviewing surgeon-sonographer was 100%. Sixty (31%) patients underwent either abdominal CT (n = 56; mean Injury Severity Score (ISS), 9.6) or immediate operation (n = 4; mean ISS, 18.8). Of the 10 patients with verified presence of intraperitoneal fluid, eight had positive and two had false-negative FAST examination results. Of the 50 patients with verified absence of intraperitoneal fluid, none had a positive FAST (ie, no false-positives); sensitivity was 80%; specificity, 100%; predictive value positive, 100%; predictive value negative, 96%. None of the 132 patients followed up clinically without CT or surgery (mean ISS, 4.5) had fluid documented by FAST, and all did well.

CONCLUSIONS

The focused assessment for the sonographic evaluation of pediatric blunt trauma patients performed by surgical residents and attendings in the ED rapidly and accurately predicted the presence or absence of intraperitoneal fluid. The FAST is a potentially valuable tool to rapidly prioritize the need for laparotomy in the child with multiple injuries and extraabdominal sources of bleeding.

The emerging role of bedside ultrasonography in trauma care

Ultrasonography has emerged as a primary imaging modality in the evaluation of the trauma victim. Both emergency physicians and surgeons have been proven capable of performing this rapid, noninvasive evaluation of the chest and abdomen. This article describes the trauma ultrasound examination and illustrates how bedside ultrasonography can be incorporated into routine trauma care.