A comparison of sonographic examinations for trauma performed by surgeons and radiologists

Diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment with Sonography for Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Pediatric Patients Performed by Emergency Medicine Residents versus Radiology Residents

INTRODUCTION

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) has been shown to be useful to detect intraperitoneal free fluid in patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).

OBJECTIVE

We compared the diagnostic accuracy of FAST performed by emergency medicine residents (EMRs) and radiology residents (RRs) in pediatric patients with BAT.

METHOD

In this prospective study, pediatric patients with BAT and high energy trauma who were referred to the emergency department (ED) at Al-Zahra and Kashani hospitals in Isfahan, Iran, were evaluated using FAST, first by EMRs and subsequently by RRs. The reports provided by the two resident groups were compared with the final outcome based on the results of the abdominal computed tomography (CT), operative exploration, and clinical observation.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients with a median age of 6.75 ± 3.2 years were enrolled in the study between January 2013 and May 2014. These patients were evaluated using FAST, first by EMRs and subsequently by RRs. A good diagnostic agreement was noted between the results of the FAST scans performed by EMRs and RRs (κ = 0.865, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy in evaluating the intraperitoneal free fluid were 72.2%, 85.5%, 52%, 93.3%, and 83.2%, respectively, when FAST was performed by EMRs and 72.2%, 86.7%, 54.2%, 93.5%, and 84.2%, respectively, when FAST was performed by RRs. No significant differences were seen between the EMR- and RR-performed FAST.

CONCLUSION

In this study, FAST performed by EMRs had acceptable diagnostic value, similar to that performed by RRs, in patients with BAT.

Interobserver Agreement on Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in Blunt Abdominal Injury

Introduction

Trauma constitutes a major public health problem. Ninty percent of world's fatalities on road occur in low and middle-income countries. Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) has a key role in trauma investigation, altering subsequent management in a significant number of patients. There is a rising trend of introducing FAST examination to non-radiologists and junior members of healthcare team to hasten triage of trauma patients.

Objective

To determine interobserver agreement on focused assessment with sonography for trauma in blunt abdominal injury between senior and junior residents.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital. Three hundred patients with blunt abdominal trauma meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled. FAST was performed using standard curvilinear 3.5-5 MHz transducer. Agreement between junior and senior residents was measured and Kappa statistic was calculated.

Results

Mean age of the patients included in the study was 30.04 ± 18.09 years. Among these 237 (79%) were male and 63 (21%) were female. Sixteen (5.3%) were positive for intraperitoneal free fluid while the remaining 284 (94.7%) were negative. A total of 19 FAST examinations were reported positive by junior residents, of which 15 (78.9%) were confirmed by a senior resident to be correct, while four (21.05%) were falsely labeled positive by a junior resident. A total of 281 negative FAST examinations were reported by junior residents, of which 280 (99.6%) were confirmed by a senior resident, while only one (0.003%) was falsely labeled negative. Kappa statistic was calculated for inter-observer agreement on FAST examination findings, which showed a kappa value of 0.84 (very good agreement), with a p-value of <0.001.

Conclusion

Our study suggests very good interobserver agreement on FAST examination between senior and junior resident in patients with blunt trauma to the abdomen. Results suggest that FAST can be easily learnt with minimal radiology training and may have greater applicability in trauma.

Senior general surgery residents can be trained to perform focused assessment with sonography for trauma patients accurately

PURPOSES

Researchers studying trauma have found that physicians are able to perform a focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) with minimal training and achieve ideal accuracy. However, there are currently no consensus or standard guidelines regarding the performance of this assessment. The aim of our study was to clarify the value of FAST performed by well-qualified senior general surgery residents in cases of suspected blunt abdominal trauma, which presents an important diagnostic problem in emergency departments.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in the emergency department (ED) of our hospital performed from January 2011 to September 2013. Patients were included if they (1) had undergone a FAST examination performed by qualified residents and (2) had received subsequent formal radiographic or surgical evaluations. The results were compared against subsequent surgical findings or formal Department of Radiology reference standards.

RESULTS

Among the 438 patients enrolled, false-negative results were obtained in 8 and false-positive results in 5. Only one patient was missed and required laparotomy to repair a small intestine perforation. The sensitivity and specificity were 87 and 99%, respectively; the accuracy was 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

Senior general surgery residents can be trained to perform accurate FAST examinations on trauma patients.

Effects of Student-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound on Physician Diagnosis and Management of Patients in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing integration of ultrasound training into medical education, there is an inadequate body of research demonstrating the benefits and practicality of medical student-performed point-of-care ultrasound (SP-POCUS) in the clinical setting.

OBJECTIVES

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects that SP-POCUS can have on physician diagnosis and management of patients in the emergency department, with a secondary purpose of evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of SP-POCUS.

METHODS

SP-POCUS examinations were performed in the emergency department by medical students who completed year one of a 4-year medical school curriculum with integrated ultrasound training. Scans were evaluated by an emergency physician who then completed a survey to record any changes in diagnosis and management.

RESULTS

A total of 641 scans were performed on the 482 patients enrolled in this study. SP-POCUS resulted in a change in management in 17.3% of scans performed. For 12.4% of scans, SP-POCUS discovered a new diagnosis. SP-POCUS reduced time to disposition 33.5% of the time. Because of SP-POCUS, physicians avoided ordering an additional imaging study for 53.0% of the scans performed. There was 94.7% physician agreement with SP-POCUS diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that SP-POCUS is feasible and may potentially have a meaningful impact on physician diagnosis and management of patients in the emergency department. In addition, the implementation of SP-POCUS could serve as an ideal method of developing ultrasound skills in medical school while positively impacting patient care.

Intraoperative lung ultrasound: A clinicodynamic perspective

In the era of evidence-based medicine, ultrasonography has emerged as an important and indispensable tool in clinical practice in various specialties including critical care. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has a wide potential in various surgical and clinical situations for timely and easy detection of an impending crisis such as pulmonary edema, endobronchial tube migration, pneumothorax, atelectasis, pleural effusion, and various other causes of desaturation before it clinically ensues to critical level. Although ultrasonography is frequently used in nerve blocks, airway handling, and vascular access, LUS for routine intraoperative monitoring and in crisis management still necessitates recognition. After reviewing the various articles regarding the use of LUS in critical care, we found, that LUS can be used in various intraoperative circumstances similar to Intensive Care Unit with some limitations. Except for few attempts in the intraoperative detection of pneumothorax, LUS is hardly used but has wider perspective for routine and crisis management in real-time. If anesthesiologists add LUS in their routine monitoring armamentarium, it can assist to move a step ahead in the dynamic management of critically ill and high-risk patients.

A Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma Performed by Emergency Medicine and Radiology Residents

BACKGROUND

Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) is a method for prompt detection of the abdominal free fluid in patients with abdominal trauma.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to compare the diagnostic accuracy of FAST performed by emergency medicine residents (EMR) and radiology residents (RRs) in detecting peritoneal free fluids.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients triaged in the emergency department with blunt abdominal trauma, high energy trauma, and multiple traumas underwent a FAST examination by EMRs and RRs with the same techniques to obtain the standard views. Ultrasound findings for free fluid in peritoneal cavity for each patient (positive/negative) were compared with the results of computed tomography, operative exploration, or observation as the final outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were included in the final analysis. Good diagnostic agreement was noted between the results of FAST scans performed by EMRs and RRs (κ = 0.701, P < 0.001), also between the results of EMRs-performed FAST and the final outcome (κ = 0.830, P < 0.0010), and finally between the results of RRs-performed FAST and final outcome (κ = 0.795, P < 0.001). No significant differences were noted between EMRs- and RRs-performed FASTs regarding sensitivity (84.6% vs 84.6%), specificity (98.4% vs 97.6%), positive predictive value (84.6% vs 84.6%), and negative predictive value (98.4% vs 98.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Trained EMRs like their fellow RRs have the ability to perform FAST scan with high diagnostic value in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

Emergency sonography AIDS diagnostic accuracy of torso injuries: a study in a resource limited setting

Introduction. Clinical evaluation of patients with torso trauma is often a diagnostic challenge. Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) is an emergency ultrasound scan that adds to the evaluation of intrathoracic abdominal and pericardial cavities done in FAST (focused assessment with sonography for trauma). Objective. This study compares EFAST (the index test) with the routine standard of care (SoC) investigations (the standard reference test) for torso trauma injuries. Methods. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted over a 3-month period. Eligible patients underwent EFAST scanning and the SoC assessment. The diagnostic accuracy of EFAST was calculated using sensitivity and specificity scores. Results. We recruited 197 patients; the M : F ratio was 5 : 1, with mean age of 27 years (SD 11). The sensitivity of EFAST was 100%, the specificity was 97%, the PPV was 87%, and the NPV was 100%. It took 5 minutes on average to complete an EFAST scan. 168 (85%) patients were EFAST-scanned. Most patients (82) (48%) were discharged on the same day of hospitalization, while 7 (4%) were still at the hospital after two weeks. The mortality rate was 18 (9%). Conclusion. EFAST is a reliable method of diagnosing torso injuries in a resource limited context.

Otolaryngologist-performed head and neck ultrasound: outcomes and challenges in learning the technique

Objective:

To assess the feasibility and accuracy of otolaryngologist-performed ultrasound in evaluating head and neck pathology.

Method:

An ENT trainee, who had undergone basic training in neck ultrasonography, performed this on patients referred with suspected neck pathology. The trainee recorded the presence and nature of any abnormality. Findings were compared with those from a repeated scan performed by an experienced head and neck radiologist.

Results:

The study included 250 patients. The absence or presence of lesion as reported by the trainee correlated with the radiologist's findings in 207 cases (83 per cent). There were 144 true positives, 63 true negatives, 32 false negatives and 11 false positives, yielding a sensitivity of 82 per cent, specificity of 85 per cent and accuracy of 83 per cent. Of the 144 true positive lesions, 81 per cent were interpreted concordantly with the radiologist.

Conclusion:

Neck ultrasonography performed by an otolaryngologist is less accurate than that performed by an experienced radiologist, but is still a useful adjunct to clinical assessment, facilitating assessment in a ‘one-stop’ clinical setting.

Emergency Ultrasound Predicting the Need for Therapeutic Laparotomy among Blunt Abdominal Trauma Patients in a Sub-Saharan African Hospital

Background. The trauma burden globally accounts for high levels of mortality and morbidity. Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) contributes significantly to this burden. Patient's evaluation for BAT remains a diagnostic challenge for emergency physicians. SSORTT gives a score that can predict the need for laparotomy. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of SSORTT score in predicting the need for a therapeutic laparotomy after BAT. Method. A prospective observational study. Eligible patients were evaluated for shock and the presence of haemoperitoneum using a portable ultrasound machine. Further evaluation of patients following the standard of care (SOC) protocol was done. The accuracy of SSORTT score in predicting therapeutic laparotomy was compared to SOC. Results. In total, 195 patients were evaluated; M : F ratio was 6 : 1. The commonest injuries were to the head 80 (42%) and the abdomen 54 (28%). A SSORTT score of >2 appropriately identified patients that needed a therapeutic laparotomy (with sensitivity 90%, specificity 90%, PPV 53%, and NPV 98%). The overall mortality rate was 17%. Conclusion. Patients with a SSORTT score of 2 and above had a high likelihood of requiring a therapeutic laparotomy. SSORTT scoring should be adopted for routine practice in low technology settings.

Paediatric and adolescent traumatic gastrointestinal injuries: results of a European multicentre analysis

AIM

Paediatric gastrointestinal injuries (GIIs) are rare, and the aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate their outcomes in a large cohort.

METHODS

Hospital databases of 10 European paediatric surgical centres were reviewed for paediatric traumatic GIIs managed between 2000-2010.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients with a median age of 9 years (0-17 years) were identified, with 72 blunt and 25 penetrating GIIs. Initial diagnostics in 90 patients led to correct diagnosis in 71%. Diagnostics were delayed in 26 patients (median 24 h). Eighty-two patients required surgery (67 laparotomy, 12 laparoscopy and three other approaches). There was a 50% conversion in the laparoscopic group. Median hospital stay was 10 days (range 1-137 days), with longer duration influenced by associated injuries (n = 41). Diagnosis <24 h was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay compared to more than 24 h (p = 0.011). In one-third of patients, morbidities were not related to a diagnostic delay or type of injury. There were five lethal outcomes, four due to associated injuries.

CONCLUSION

Initial diagnostics in traumatic paediatric GIIs provide false negatives in one-third of patients. Diagnostic delay <24 h is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay. Although laparoscopy is associated with a conversion rate of 50%, it can be used for diagnosis in suspected cases to avoid nontherapeutic laparotomy.

To determine the accuracy of focused assessment with sonography for trauma done by nonradiologists and its comparative analysis with radiologists in emergency department of a level 1 trauma center of India

Background:

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is an important skill during trauma resuscitation. Use of point of care ultrasound among the trauma team working in emergency care settings is lacking in India.

Objective:

To determine the accuracy of FAST done by nonradiologists (NR) when compared to radiologists during primary survey of trauma victims in the emergency department of a level 1 trauma center in India.

Materials and Methods:

A prospective study was done during primary survey of resuscitation of nonconsecutive patients in the resuscitation bay. The study subjects included NR such as one consultant emergency medicine, two medicine residents, one orthopedic resident and one surgery resident working as trauma team. These subjects underwent training at 3-day workshop on emergency sonography and performed 20 supervised positive and negative scans for free fluid. The FAST scans were first performed by NR and then by radiology residents (RR). The performers were blinded to each other's sonography findings. Computed tomography (CT) and laparotomy findings were used as gold standard whichever was feasible. Results were compared between both the groups. Intraobserver variability among NR and RR were noted.

Results:

Out of 150 scans 144 scans were analyzed. Mean age of the patients was 28 [1-70] years. Out of 24 true positive patients 18 underwent CT scan and exploratory laparotomies were done in six patients. Sensitivity of FAST done by NR and RR were 100% and 95.6% and specificity was 97.5% in both groups. Positive predictive value among NR and RR were 88.8%, 88.46% and negative predictive value were 97.5% and 99.15%. Intraobserver performance variation ranged from 87 to 97%.

Conclusion:

FAST performed by NRs is accurate during initial trauma resuscitation in the emergency department of a level 1 trauma center in India.

Ultrasonographic diagnosis of abdominal free fluid: accuracy comparison of emergency physicians and radiologists

OBJECTIVE

Blunt abdominal trauma is a diagnostic challenge for emergency physicians and ultrasonography is one of the diagnostic tools used in this type of injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonographies performed by emergency physicians and radiologists.

METHODS

This prospective diagnostic study was performed in the emergency departments of two trauma centers in Iran during a period of 12 months. The subjects were all patients with blunt abdominal trauma that were candidated for abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scanning in our emergency departments. The results of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) performed by emergency physicians and radiologists were compared blindly with the results of CT scans performed by radiologists. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of diagnosis for different abdominal anatomic areas were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 450 patients undergoing FAST and CT scanning were studied. The sensitivity of radiologists' diagnoses for Morison's, splenorenal, perivesical, and pleural effusion areas were, respectively, 88.0, 70.0, 38.0, and 30.0 %. The corresponding values for emergency physicians' diagnoses were, respectively, 82.0, 60.0, 28.0, and 30.0 %. The specificity of radiologists' diagnoses in the mentioned areas were, respectively, 98.9, 100, 93.1, and 100 %, and for emergency physicians, they were, respectively, 98.9, 100, 96.0, and 100 %.

CONCLUSION

Emergency physicians showed a promising performance in applying FAST in blunt abdominal trauma. The specificity of ultrasonographic diagnosis in the emergency physicians group and the radiologists group were comparable, while radiologists showed a higher performance regarding the sensitivity of the ultrasonographic diagnosis.

An Evidence-Based Approach for Integrating Bedside Ultrasound Into Routine Practice in the Assessment of Undifferentiated Shock

Undifferentiated hypotension remains a central diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in emergency and critical care medicine. Increasingly, bedside ultrasound conducted by intensivists and emergency medicine providers is assuming a central role in diagnosis and resuscitation of hypotension. This review discusses sample algorithms for the bedside ultrasonographic assessment of undifferentiated shock and outlines an evidence-based framework for the intensivist seeking to incorporate bedside ultrasound into daily clinical practice. The literature regarding specific applications including cardiac, thoracic, pulmonary, and vascular assessment is briefly reviewed, as is the evidence pertaining to effective implementation, training, credentialing, and ongoing quality assurance.

Hollow viscus injury

BACKGROUND

Hollow viscus injuries are uncommon and occur in approximately 1% of all blunt trauma patients.

DISCUSSION

These injuries are often not suspected and are difficult to diagnosis. Morbidity and mortality are high, and a negative abdominal computed tomography is not sufficient to rule out these injuries in certain clinical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Using a case-based approach, the epidemiology and diagnostic pathways to manage hollow viscus injuries are reviewed.

Focused bedside ultrasonography by clinicians: experiences with a basic introductory course

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasonography (US) performed by clinicians might shorten workout time and diminish the workload of simple diagnostic procedures for physicians specialized in US. The purpose of this follow-up study was to evaluate the effect of an introductory course in US on participants' clinical behaviour and course compliance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The course consisted of a combined didactic, hands-on, one-day course including a skills test and a review of 20 still-pictures of pathological findings for final authorization. A questionnaire focusing on pre- and post-course activity and its impact on clinical behaviour was sent to 162 participants.

RESULTS

The response rate was 64% (103). Forty-eight (47%) participants changed their clinical approach, 45 (44%) their workout programme and 25 (24%) the pattern of referral. Eleven (10%) sent in the required pathological findings for final authorization. Thirty-four (33%) participants did not carry out US after the course; 19 did not have access to US apparatus, 7 claimed that they lacked the time, 6 lacked supervision and 1 participant cited insufficiency of the course. Clinical approach was changed by 48 (47%), acute workout by 45 (44%) and pattern of referral by 24 (23%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians appear to be ready to change the patterns of their workout programmes and clinical approach after a combined didactic and hands-on introduction to US, but only 10% produced the recommended documentation for authorization. National guidelines need to be introduced for gastroenterologists and surgeons or the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines should be implemented.

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma: the FAST scan

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma or focused abdominal sonography for trauma — the FAST scan, has become a useful modality for the initial evaluation of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The technique is used to identify free fluid in the abdomen and pelvis and to detect the presence of a pericardial effusion. FAST can be performed by any trained individual, not necessarily a sonographer or radiologist, aiding in the immediate availability of this technique in the emergency situation. We will discuss the applications and sensitivity of this technique in trauma and review the potential pitfalls and limitations which need to be understood if this technique is to be safely applied. The use of FAST for the detection of pneumothoraces in trauma and other advances in FAST scanning, such as scoring systems and paediatric FAST are also reviewed.

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage and ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma: attitudes and training of current general surgical trainees

OBJECTIVE

It has been suggested that diagnostic peritoneal lavage is now obsolete in UK hospitals with access to either skilled ultrasonography or emergency physician or surgeon-performed focused abdominal sonography in trauma. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage continues to be advocated and taught on Advanced Trauma Life Support courses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the experiences and attitudes of general-surgery trainees in one UK training region towards diagnostic peritoneal lavage and focused abdominal sonography in trauma in managing blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

An anonymous postal piloted questionnaire was sent to all 66 general surgery specialist trainees in one UK training region between January and March 2005.

RESULTS

Out of 40 replies to the questionnaire (response rate 61%), 53% and 38% of surgical trainees had either never performed or never observed a diagnostic peritoneal lavage during their training. Thirteen trainees (33%) felt diagnostic peritoneal lavage to be obsolete and would never contemplate using it; 15 trainees (37%) might consider using diagnostic peritoneal lavage if computed tomography or ultrasonography were unavailable. Ten trainees (25%) felt that diagnostic peritoneal lavage had been superseded by computed tomography. Only 12 trainees (30%) had worked in a UK hospital with access to facilities for focused abdominal sonography in trauma and only seven trainees (18%) had received any training or experience in focused abdominal sonography in trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical trainees in one UK training region lack skills in both diagnostic peritoneal lavage and focused abdominal sonography in trauma for managing blunt abdominal trauma and are therefore reliant upon the availability of prompt, skilled radiological assistance or emergency physician-provided focused abdominal sonography in trauma.

Identification and Resuscitation of the Trauma Patient in Shock

This article focuses on rapid diagnosis and treatment of the patient suffering from trauma-related shock, including early identification of patients at risk for occult hypoperfusion. Resuscitation strategies (delayed resuscitation, damage control resuscitation), end points of resuscitation, and the role of blood products and pro-coagulants for resuscitation are discussed.

Focused ultrasound training for clinicians

Clinician use of diagnostic ultrasound, particularly at point of care and in emergency situations, is well established. The standard of training courses and of postcourse supervision and accreditation is variable, and international standards are required to maintain safety, accuracy, and credibility of the technique. The accuracy of the technique by trained personnel has been well documented. There is evidence that prereading, a course involving theoretical and practical training, and ongoing mentoring (proctoring) provides high standards of practice. Regular accreditation and continuous comparison with gold standards is required to maintain this level. Most areas of the body are now accessible to clinicians of varied specialties, even those previously thought impossible for ultrasound examination, such as the chest and bone. Training and supervision in rural, remote, and austere environments provides added challenges.

Are diagnostic peritoneal lavage or focused abdominal sonography for trauma safe screening investigations for hemodynamically stable patients after blunt abdominal trauma? A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Assessment of patients in the emergency department who sustain blunt abdominal trauma represents a significant diagnostic challenge. Computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used as the principal investigation for these patients. A sensitive screening test could safely reduce the use of CT.

OBJECTIVES

To appraise the evidence supporting the use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and focused abdominal sonography for trauma as screening tests in the emergency department to reduce the use of CT in the initial assessment of patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

A search of high-quality evidence resources was performed, followed by a hand search of the bibliographies of all relevant articles.

RESULTS

Altogether, 55 articles were found during the initial search, of which 23 were relevant. An additional 11 were found by hand searching. Six relevant original research articles were found.

CONCLUSION

Screening diagnostic peritoneal lavage and selective CT is a safe diagnostic strategy for the investigation of blunt abdominal trauma. Further research is needed to determine the role of focused abdominal sonography for trauma scanning in diagnostic protocols.

History of emergency and critical care ultrasound: The evolution of a new imaging paradigm

The tradition of clinical ultrasound in the hands of physicians who provide critical care to the most acutely ill patients stretches back into the 1980s and is rich with experiences from surgical, emergency medicine, and other practices. Now, as critical care ultrasound explodes around the world, it is important to realize the path its development has taken and learn from trials and tribulations of early practitioners in the field. The development and battles for the right to use ultrasound at the patient's bedside for >20 yrs is described in relation to its emergency medicine and surgical origins. Approaches to education, scanning, documentation, and organization at the national and regional levels are described.

A bedside ultrasound curriculum for medical students: prospective evaluation of skill acquisition

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of an introductory ultrasound (US) curriculum for medical students rotating through our emergency department.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Third- and 4th-year medical students indicated their previous US experience and were given a pretest consisting of static US images to assess baseline interpretation skills. They participated in a 45-min interactive didactic session followed by a 45-min session of hands-on experience practicing real-time US image acquisition on a normal model. After this session, we tested the timing and quality of their image acquisition skills on a separate normal model. Quality of images was based on a point value from 0 to 2 per image. This was followed by a posttest of static US images, which was graded in the same manner as the pretest.

RESULTS

Thirty-one students participated in the study. Median time to acquire 2 images was 112.5 sec (range = 15420 sec). Acquisition time was unaffected by previous experience (p = .97). The mean score on the quality of 2 images (maximum score = 4) was 3.84; median was 4 (range = 14). Image quality was significantly better in participants with previous US experience (p = .014). Scores on interpretation of static images improved significantly from pretest to posttest by a median of 8.25 points (p = .0001).

CONCLUSION

Our introductory US course is effective at significantly improving medical students' interpretation of static US images. The majority of students were able to acquire high quality images in a short period of time after this session.

Diagnostic accuracy of surgeon-performed focused abdominal sonography (FAST) in blunt paediatric trauma

AIM

To study the diagnostic accuracy and clinical efficacy of surgeon-performed focused abdominal sonography (FAST) in paediatric blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This was a prospective, single blinded study conducted at The Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney (CHW). All patients with BAT that justified a trauma call activated on presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) had a FAST performed by the Trauma Fellow. The attending surgical team was blinded to the result of the FAST. An independent radiologist reviewed the FAST pictures, and the findings were compared with computerised tomography (CT), ultrasound (US), laparotomy and the clinical outcome of the patient. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients (39 M; 26 F) were enrolled in the study between February 2002 and January 2003. The age ranged between 4 months and 16 years. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 6 (range 1-38). FAST was performed in a mean time of 3 min. Inter-rater agreement was 96%. FAST was positive in nine as confirmed by a CT scan of the abdomen. Three patients underwent laparotomy, two for bowel injuries and one for a Grade III liver laceration. Of the remaining 76, 19 had a CT, which showed evidence of intra-abdominal injury in seven patients. There were two false negative studies resulting in a sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 100%, negative predictive value of 97%, positive predictive value of 100% and an accuracy of 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon-performed FAST for BAT was safe and accurate with a high specificity. It would seem a potentially valuable tool in the evaluation of paediatric blunt trauma victims for free fluid within the peritoneal cavity.

FAST on operational military deployment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Handheld ultrasound, because of its light weight, size, rugged design, and relative simplicity of use is ideal for use on operational military deployment. These machines have been used in the diagnosis of a range of traumatic conditions including abdominal, thoracic, and extremity trauma in the hospital environment, yet few data exist on their use during military operations. This paper presents experience of handheld focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) on operational military deployment.

METHOD

Over a two month period, handheld FAST was performed by a single surgeon during the circulation phase of the primary survey in trauma patients presenting to the British Military Hospital in Iraq.

RESULTS

Fifteen from casualties underwent a FAST examination. Ten were victims of blunt trauma, two had received injuries anti-personnel mines, and three had penetrating injuries from ballistic trauma. There was one positive FAST, confirmed at laparotomy as bleeding from a liver injury. Thirteen scans were negative and remained negative on repeat FAST at 6 hours. One further patient with a negative FAST underwent laparotomy because of transectory, there was no intra-abdominal blood or fluid at surgery.

CONCLUSION

Handheld FAST is a valuable technique for investigating abdominal or thoracic bleeding in single or multiple casualty events on operational military deployment.

Prospective evaluation of non-radiologist performed emergency abdominal ultrasound for haemoperitoneum

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate non-radiologist performed emergency ultrasound for the detection of haemoperitoneum after abdominal trauma in a British accident and emergency department.

METHODS

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) was performed during the primary survey on adult patients triaged to the resuscitation room with suspected abdominal injury over a 12 month period. All investigations were performed by one of three non-radiologists trained in FAST. The ultrasound findings were compared against the investigation of choice of the attending surgeon/accident and emergency physician. The patients were followed up for clinically significant events until hospital discharge or death.

RESULTS

One hundred patients who had sustained blunt abdominal trauma, were evaluated by FAST. Nine true positive scans were detected and confirmed by computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, or laparotomy. There was one false positive in this group, giving a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 99%, and positive predictive value of 90%. Ten patients with penetrating injuries were evaluated with a sensitivity and specificity for FAST of 33% and 86% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency torso ultrasound for the detection of haemoperitoneum can be successfully performed by trained non-radiologists within a British accident and emergency system. It is an accurate and rapid investigation for blunt trauma, but the results should be interpreted with caution in penetrating injury.

Establishment of a teaching animal model for sonographic diagnosis of trauma

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is widely accepted as a valuable diagnostic tool for detecting intra-abdominal and intrathoracic bleeding in trauma patients. Nevertheless, many doctors are reluctant to use it because they do not have sufficient training. This study aimed to define intra-abdominal and intrathoracic fluid volumes that can be detected by sonography and their relation to fluid width in pigs to establish a clinically relevant animal model for teaching and training.

METHODS

Different volumes of normal saline were infused into the abdomen (50-2,000 mL) and chest (25-250 mL) in five anesthetized pigs. The maximum width of fluid as detected by ultrasound was recorded. The right upper quadrant, left upper quadrant, pelvis, and right paracolic section of the abdomen and right pleural cavity were studied. An experienced radiologist performed the studies. The effects on respiratory and cardiovascular functions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The sonographic findings in the pig were similar to those in humans. Up to 50 mL of intra-abdominal fluid and up to 25 mL of intrathoracic fluid could be detected by ultrasound. There was a significant correlation between the volume infused and the fluid width detected. The respiratory and cardiovascular monitoring of the animals showed that the infused intrathoracic volumes mimicked a survivable hemothorax.

CONCLUSION

The pig may serve as an excellent clinically relevant model with which to teach surgeons detection of different volumes of intra-abdominal and intrathoracic fluids. The value of this model as an educational tool has yet to be tested.

Critical concepts in abdominal injury

Missed intra-abdominal injuries are among the most frequent causes of potentially preventable trauma deaths. The evaluation and management of abdominal trauma is dependant on multiple factors, including mechanism of injury, location of injury, hemodynamic status of the patient, neurologic status of the patient, associated injuries, and institutional resources.

Successful diagnosis of penetrating cardiac injury using surgeon-performed sonography

BACKGROUND

Patients with penetrating cardiac injuries have a high mortality. The utilization of sonography in these patients may lead to earlier diagnosis and definitive surgical intervention.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients admitted to a level I trauma center were examined from March 1996 to March 2001 (17,241 patients). Patients were identified with penetrating thoracic injuries and were evaluated for mechanism of injury, sonographic findings (subxiphoid and parasternal windows), injury severity score, length of stay, and mortality. Surgeons performed all sonography.

RESULTS

There were 478 patients who underwent sonography for penetrating thoracic injuries. Twenty-three patients were identified with positive sonographic findings. Subsequently 20 patients had a cardiac injury at surgery. There were no missed injuries. The 3 patients with false positive findings had congestive heart failure (2 patients) and morbid obesity (1 patient). Mean time to operation was 13 minutes. Mean injury severity score was 33. Mean intensive care unit and hospital stay was 3.1 days and 7.2 days respectively. Sonography had a specificity of 99.3% and sensitivity of 100% for identifying penetrating cardiac injury and a positive predictive value of 87% and negative predictive value of 100%. There were no hospital deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Early diagnosis and management using surgeon performed sonography may reduce the high mortality associated with penetrating cardiac injury.

Blunt abdominal trauma: should US be used to detect both free fluid and organ injuries?

PURPOSE

To evaluate abdominal ultrasonography (US) for indirect (with free fluid analysis only) and direct (with free fluid and parenchymal analysis) detection of organ injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, with findings at computed tomography (CT) and/or surgery as the standard of diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Abdominal US was performed at hospital admission in consecutive patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The presence of free peritoneal fluid and organ injury were recorded and compared with results of abdominal CT in all hemodynamically stable patients. When US results were considered false-negative for free fluid or organ injury compared with CT results, repeat US was performed within 6 hours. Admission and second US results were compared with CT and/or surgical results to determine sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of US with regard to the presence of free intraperitoneal fluid and/or organ injury.

RESULTS

Two hundred five hemodynamically stable patients underwent abdominal US and CT. CT revealed free fluid in 83 patients and organ injury in 99. Thirty-one (31%) of 99 patients with organ injury did not have free fluid at CT. Three (10%) of the 31 patients required surgery or angiographic embolization. The sensitivity of admission US was 93% (77 of 83 cases) for the diagnosis of free fluid, 41% (39 of 99) for directly demonstrating organ injury, and 72% (71 of 99) for suggesting organ injury by means of both free fluid and organ analysis. At second US, these sensitivities were 96% (80 of 83 cases), 55% (54 of 99) and 84% (83 of 99), respectively.

CONCLUSION

US is highly sensitive for the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid but not sensitive for the identification of organ injuries. In hemodynamically stable patients, the value of US is mainly limited by the large percentage of organ injuries that are not associated with free fluid.

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma patients by clinicians: Initial experience and results

OBJECTIVES

To describe the establishment of a service to provide bedside focused assessment sonography in trauma and to evaluate the service to date.

SETTING

Emergency department of an urban trauma centre.

METHODS

A prospective study of trauma patients who received a focused assessment sonography in trauma examination performed by a clinician managing the trauma in the emergency department. Accuracy was determined by comparing the scan interpretation with abdomino-pelvic computerized tomography, laparotomy or postmortem examination.

RESULTS

The study period ran from 1 January 2000 to 11 September 2001 inclusive (20 months). One hundred and forty patients were included, with a final diagnosis established by computerized tomography (n = 124) and/or laparotomy (n = 18). There were 26 true-positives, 101 true-negatives, two false-positives and 11 false-negatives. Ten of the false-negative studies were performed by clinicians who had not reached accreditation. The sensitivity of focused assessment sonography in trauma was 70%, specificity 98% and diagnostic accuracy 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

We have described the implementation of a clinician-based focused assessment sonography in trauma service within the emergency department with the support of radiology/ultrasound and trauma service. Processes for credentialling, quality assurance and training need to be in place. Significant issues exist with the length of time it takes clinicians to reach accreditation, in order that a critical mass of clinicians exists to provide a consistent service. The credentialling process should mandate a minimum number of supervised examinations.

Senior Surgical Residents Can Accurately Interpret Trauma Radiographs

Surgical residents routinely interpret radiographic studies during the evaluation of trauma patients, which directs further evaluation and invasive procedures. Official interpretations—“post-reading”—of radiographs by radiologists may be delayed by hours or even days. Trauma surgeons frequently act on their impressions before “official” readings are available. It has been demonstrated that surgical residents can accurately perform and interpret trauma ultrasound examinations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of senior surgery residents to interpret basic trauma radiographs. Interpretations of trauma radiographs (cervical spine, chest, pelvis, and CT of the brain) were recorded prospectively by the senior surgery resident present during trauma evaluations. These interpretations were compared with the findings of the radiologist as obtained from the official radiology report. Differing results were divided into clinically significant and clinically nonsignificant findings using defined criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were determined. Interpretations of trauma radiographs by senior residents achieved an accuracy of 100 per cent for cervical spine radiographs, 95.9 per cent for chest radiographs, 98.0 per cent for pelvis radiographs, and 97.9 per cent for CT of the head. In aggregate senior residents interpreted trauma radiographs with 97.9 per cent accuracy. Differences that were considered clinically significant according to preset criteria occurred in 2.1 per cent of observations. We conclude that senior general surgical residents can accurately interpret trauma radiology, including CT of the brain. These results suggest that institutional policies for post-reading of trauma radiology should be reassessed.

The use of ultrasound by breast surgeons in outpatients: an accurate extension of clinical diagnosis

AIMS

To assess the accuracy of breast ultrasound scan (USS) performed by a surgeon in outpatients and to evaluate the additional contribution of USS to clinical diagnosis.

METHODS

A prospective study of 302 patients with symptomatic breast disease (322 lumps) was performed. Group 1 consisted of 213 clinic USS of lumps surgically removed for appropriate clinical indications. In Group 2, a USS was performed on 231 lumps by both the surgeon and radiologists as part of triple assessment. Each clinic USS was compared to the surgical pathology (Group 1) or USS performed by the radiologist (Group 2).

RESULTS

In Group 1 (n=213), 89 lumps were proven benign and 124 malignant on histology. Ultrasound scans performed by the surgeon compared to histology had a sensitivity of 98.3% and specificity of 91.7%. An abnormal clinic USS heightened the index of suspicion in 22/213 (10.3%) of cases felt clinically to be benign but subsequently confirmed malignant on histology. Fifty-seven lumps felt to be indeterminate clinically were correctly identified on USS by surgeon as benign (n=56) or malignant (n=1). In Group 2 (n=231), there was complete concordance of USS scans by surgeon and radiologists in 197 (96%) and complete discordance in eight (3.9%) patients. Of the discordant scans, the surgeon correctly identified 7/8 diagnoses on histology. A USS examination by the radiologists provided a correct diagnosis of 6/14 scans scored by the clinician as indeterminate.

CONCLUSION

USS performed in outpatients by a breast surgeon is accurate and a useful adjunct to clinical assessment. This enables rapid diagnosis in one-stop breast clinics, selecting difficult diagnostic procedures for USS by radiologists at the same visit.

Accuracy of emergency department bedside ultrasonography

OBJECTIVES

To determine which focused ultrasound examinations can be interpreted accurately by emergency physicians who have limited training and experience. To determine whether image quality and/or the operator's level of confidence in the findings correlates with accurate scan interpretation.

METHODS

A prospective sample of consenting adult emergency department patients with the conditions was selected for study. Scans were performed by emergency physicians who had attended a 3-day focused ultrasound examinations instruction course. All scans were videotaped and subsequently reviewed by a radiologist. Accuracy was determined by comparing the emergency physicians scan interpretation with preselected gold standards. Chi-squared tests were employed to determine if the individual performing the scan, the type of scan, patient's body habitus, image quality and/or operator confidence were reliable predictors of accuracy.

RESULTS

Between September 1997 and January 1999, 221 scans were studied. Accuracy varied widely depending on the type of scan performed: aortic scans were 100% accurate whereas renal scans had 68% accuracy. On bivariate analyses, there was little variation in the various operators' levels of proficiency and accuracy of interpretation was not associated with patient body habitus, image quality or operator confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Neophytes can accurately perform and interpret aortic scans; additional training and/or experience appear to be necessary to achieve proficiency in conducting most of the other scans studied. Inexperienced operators are unable to discern whether their scan interpretations will prove accurate.

Absent peritoneal fluid on screening trauma ultrasonography in children: a prospective comparison with computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Although the accuracy of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) in adults has been demonstrated, results of this technique in children have been conflicting with few comparisons against computed tomography (CT), the imaging gold standard.

METHODS

A total of 160 hemodynamically stable pediatric trauma victims referred for abdominal CT initially underwent rapid screening sonography looking for free fluid. Both studies were interpreted in blinded fashion.

RESULTS

Forty-four of the 160 patients had an intraabdominal injury on CT, 24 (55%) of which had normal screening sonography. Fifteen of the 44 (34%) had no free fluid on either modality. Accuracy of sonography compared with CT was 76% with a negative predictive value 81%.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonography for free fluid alone is not reliable to exclude blunt intraabdominal injury in hemodynamically stable children given the considerable percentage of injured patients without free fluid. J Pediatr Surg 36:565-569.

Abdominal ultrasound examination in pregnant blunt trauma patients

BACKGROUND

The ability of abdominal ultrasound to detect intraperitoneal fluid in the pregnant trauma patient has been questioned.

METHODS

Pregnant blunt trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center during an 8-year period were reviewed. Ultrasound examinations were used to detect intraperitoneal fluid and considered positive if such fluid was identified.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven (61%) of 208 pregnant patients had abdominal ultrasound during initial evaluation in the emergency department. Seven patients had intra-abdominal injuries, and six had documented hemoperitoneum. Ultrasound identified intraperitoneal fluid in five of these six patients (sensitivity, 83%; 95% confidence interval, 36-100%). In the 120 patients without intra-abdominal injury, ultrasound was negative in 117 (specificity, 98%; 95% confidence interval, 93-100%). The three patients without intra-abdominal injury but with a positive ultrasound had the following: serous intraperitoneal fluid and no injuries at laparotomy (one) and uneventful clinical courses of observation (two).

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity and specificity of abdominal ultrasonography in pregnant trauma patients is similar to that seen in nonpregnant patients. Occasional false negatives occur and a negative initial examination should not be used as conclusive evidence that intra-abdominal injury is not present. Ultrasound has the advantages of no radiation exposure.

Utilization of FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) in 1999: Results of a Survey of North American Trauma Centers

Although much has been written about FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) in the last decade little is known about its present clinical utilization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and characterize the contemporary utilization of FAST at trauma centers in the United States and Canada. In 1999 trauma directors or their delegates at Level I regional trauma centers in the United States and Canada were surveyed either by fax or phone regarding the present utilization and the future of FAST at their center. The overall survey response rate was 91 per cent with 96 of 105 centers completing the survey. Of the 96 centers surveyed 78 were in the United States and 18 were in Canada. Of the 78 U.S. centers surveyed 62 (79%) routinely use FAST, and it is done by surgeons in 39 per cent, surgeons and emergency departments in 21 per cent, emergency departments in 5 per cent, and radiologists in 35 per cent. Most centers (79%) thought that it sped up their workups, and 89 per cent said it was an advance in patient care. FAST is used in penetrating injury at 58 per cent of centers, and some centers use FAST to assess organ injury. The utilization of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and CT has markedly decreased at many centers. Almost all respondents thought that FAST should be a component of surgery resident training. The utilization of FAST is significantly less in Canada than in the United States ( P < 0.05). Our conclusions are the following. FAST has become routinely used at the majority of the U.S. centers surveyed. FAST is performed by clinicians at 65 per cent of the trauma centers surveyed. The utilization of CT and diagnostic peritoneal lavage has changed. Many centers have broadened the scope of FAST to include the assessment of organ, pediatric, and penetrating injury.

Robotics and telecommunication systems to provide better access to ultrasound expertise in the OR

Surgery has begun to evolve as a result of the intense use of technological innovations. The result of this is better services for patients and enormous opportunities for the producers of biomedical instruments. The surgeon and the technologist are fast becoming allies in applying the latest developments of robotics, image treatment, simulation, sensors and telecommunications to surgery, in particular to the emerging field of minimally-invasive surgery. Ultrasonography is at present utilised both for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in various fields. Intraoperative US examination can be of primary importance, especially when dealing with space-occupying lesions. The widening use of minimally-invasive surgery has furthered the development of US for use during this type of surgery. The success of a US examination requires not only a correct execution of the procedure, but also a correct interpretation of the images. We describe two projects that combine robotics and telecommunication systems to provide better access to US expertise in the operating room. The Midstep project has as its object the realisation of two robotic arms, one for the distant control of the US probe during laparoscopic surgery and the second to perform tele-interventional US. The second project, part of the Strategic CNR Project-'Robotics in Surgery', involves the realisation of a common platform for tracking and targeting surgical instruments in video-assisted surgery.

Childhood trauma. Now and in the new millennium

Given the magnitude of childhood injuries that occur yearly in the United States, physicians need integrated echelons of care that include regional pediatric trauma centers, trauma centers with pediatric commitment, and EDs appropriate for children. Head injury is the most significant cause of morbidity and mortality among children, but physicians are far from effectively evaluating the dynamics of cerebral metabolism and oxygen delivery in the acute resuscitation of injured children. Critically injured children must be kept normothermic, and attention to the signs of hypovolemic shock must be monitored. Secondary brain ischemia frequently occurs because the details of resuscitation are not carefully monitored. A "leader" must be designated, and this should be someone experienced in childhood trauma. The younger the child and the more severe the injury, the more important is the notion of "experience." The ultimate goal, now and in the new millennium, should not be who, where, or when to administer care to critically ill or injured children but rather the quality of the treatment of these children.

Clinical evaluation of the child: injury to the chest and abdomen

In the paediatric age group (under 18 years) injury continues to be the dominant cause of mortality, being more common than all other causes combined. Disability resulting from injury represents a major expenditure in financial and emotional terms. The child’s anatomy and physiology are such that directly applying the principles of adult trauma care to the child can result in a less than optimal outcome and can add to long-term and/or permanent disability. Chest and abdominal injuries are the second and third most common causes of death, respectively, in childhood and when combined represent the second leading cause of death in this age group due to injury. There are six life-threatening injuries seen in paediatric injuries: airway obstruction, tension pneumothorax, massive haemothorax, open pneumothorax, flail chest and cardiac tamponade. There are six other potentially life-threatening injuries: simple pneumothorax, pulmonary contusion, tracheobronchial disruption, blunt cardiac injury, aortic disruption and haemothorax. These entities are discussed in terms of identification and treatment.

Abdominal injuries are generally well recognized by trauma surgeons. The difference in the paediatric age group involves the diagnosis of intra-abdominal injuries. The principle of diagnosis is that the injured organ should be specifically identified, not just left at the impression that something is bleeding, perforated or otherwise disrupted. The main diagnostic modality is the spiral or helical computerized tomography scan. This is an appropriate diagnostic method in all but the most severely injured and haemodynamically abnormal children. Care in initial assessment and management and in specific diagnosis has great potential to decrease the mortality in a country’s youngest citizens.