Preload assessment in patients with an open abdomen

Open Abdomen in a Critically Ill Patient

One of the damage control strategies used to avoid or treat abdominal compartment syndrome is “open abdomen (OA),” where the facial edges and the skin is left open, exposing the abdominal viscera. Although it reduces the mortality both in trauma and non-trauma abdominal complications, it does create a significant challenge in an intensive care setting, as it has physiological consequences that need early recognition and prompt treatment both in the intensive care unit and in the operating room. The article aims to review literature on “open abdomen,” describe the challenges in such cases, and proposes a guideline for the intensivist in managing a patient with an OA.

How to cite this article: Mitra LG, Saluja V, Dhingra U. Open Abdomen in a Critically Ill Patient. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(Suppl 4):S193–S200.

Is intra-abdominal hypertension a risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia?

In the last years, there has been a significant amount of research about the impact of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) on the outcomes of critical care patients. IAH is increasingly recognized as potential complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. IAH affects all body systems, most notably the cardiac, respiratory, renal, and neurologic systems. IAH affects blood flow to various organs and plays a significant role in the prognosis of the patients. Recognition of IAH, its risk factors and clinical signs can reduce the morbidity and mortality associated. Moreover, knowledge of the pathophysiology may help rationalize the therapeutic approach. On the other hand, ICU patients present frequently ventilator- associated respiratory infections. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common healthcare-associated infection (HAI) in adult critical care units. It is associated with increased ICU stay, patient ventilator days and mortality. This paper reviews the relationship between IAH and VAP. Despite animal experimentation and physiological studies on humans, in favor of the impact of IAH to VAP, there is no definitive clinical data that IAH is associated with VAP. Microaspirations form the gastrointestinal track is a pathophysiological mechanism for VAP. This review provides data suggesting that under IAH conditions bacterial translocation might be an additional responsible mechanism for VAP in those patients that merits further investigation in the future.

Intra-Abdominal Hypertension is a Risk Factor for Increased VAP Incidence: A Prospective Cohort Study in the ICU of a Tertiary Hospital

BACKGROUND

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) might be increased in cases with intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). However, despite animal experimentation and physiological studies on humans in favor of this hypothesis, there is no definitive clinical data that IAH is associated with VAP. We therefore aimed to study whether IAH is a risk factor for increased incidence of VAP in critical care patients. This 1-center prospective observational cohort study was conducted in the intensive care unit of the University Hospital of Larissa, Greece, during 2013 to 2015. Consecutive patients were recruited if they presented risk factors for IAH at admission and were evaluated systematically for IAH and VAP for a 28-day period.

RESULTS

Forty-five (36.6%) of 123 patients presented IAH and 45 (36.6%) presented VAP; 24 patients presented VAP following IAH. Cox regression analysis showed that VAP was independently associated with IAH (1.06 [1.01-1.11]; P = .053), while there was an indication for an independent association between VAP and abdominal surgery (1.62 [0.87-3.03]; P = .11] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1.79 [0.96-3.37]; P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-abdominal hypertension is an independent risk factor for increased VAP incidence in critically ill patients who present risk factors for IAH at admission to the ICU.

The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines

Damage control resuscitation may lead to postoperative intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. These conditions may result in a vicious, self-perpetuating cycle leading to severe physiologic derangements and multiorgan failure unless interrupted by abdominal (surgical or other) decompression. Further, in some clinical situations, the abdomen cannot be closed due to the visceral edema, the inability to control the compelling source of infection or the necessity to re-explore (as a "planned second-look" laparotomy) or complete previously initiated damage control procedures or in cases of abdominal wall disruption. The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients has been proposed to be effective in preventing or treating deranged physiology in patients with severe injuries or critical illness when no other perceived options exist. Its use, however, remains controversial as it is resource consuming and represents a non-anatomic situation with the potential for severe adverse effects. Its use, therefore, should only be considered in patients who would most benefit from it. Abdominal fascia-to-fascia closure should be done as soon as the patient can physiologically tolerate it. All precautions to minimize complications should be implemented.

Open abdomen critical care management principles: resuscitation, fluid balance, nutrition, and ventilator management

The term "open abdomen" refers to a surgically created defect in the abdominal wall that exposes abdominal viscera. Leaving an abdominal cavity temporarily open has been well described for several indications, including damage control surgery and abdominal compartment syndrome. Although beneficial in certain patients, the act of keeping an abdominal cavity open has physiologic repercussions that must be recognized and managed during postoperative care. This review article describes these issues and provides guidelines for the critical care physician managing a patient with an open abdomen.

Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia: the prevalent cause of gastrointestinal infarction in patients with severe burn injuries

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal complications occur frequently in intensive care patients with severe burns. Intestinal infarction and its deleterious consequences result in high mortality despite rapid surgical intervention. Our objective was to evaluate the aetiology of gastrointestinal infarction in intensive care patients with severe burns.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated all of the severe-burn victims at the burn unit of the Medical University of Vienna from 01/2002 to 06/2012 for whom a gastrointestinal infarction was diagnosed during their inpatient stay on computed-tomography, in the context of acute laparotomy, or upon autopsy by aetiology.

RESULTS

After a severe thermal injury, 17 patients suffered a gastrointestinal infarction during their stay. In 82% of those patients, non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia (NOMI) was identified as the cause of the gastrointestinal infarction. Patients with an embolic infarction tended to be older (78.0years embolism vs. 53.4 NOMI, mean, p<0.01), with a lower abbreviated burn severity index (8.7 embolism vs. 10.4 NOMI, mean, p<0.02) and a smaller total body surface area burned (20% embolism vs. 48% NOMI, mean, p<0.01) than those with a non-occlusive mesenterial ischaemia. No patients with an embolic infarction or any of the females in the entire gastrointestinal infarction group survived this event, resulting in a mortality rate of 100% for the embolic infarction group and female group. The decisive factor for surviving a NOMI was age (median age: male survivors 28years vs. nonsurvivors 66years (of this median, males=72years and females=60years), p<0.02).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study clearly demonstrate that in severe-burn intensive care patients, non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia is the most frequent cause of gastrointestinal infarction and that the decisive factor for survival is the patient's age.

Cardiovascular implications of abdominal compartment syndrome

Cardiovascular dysfunction and failure are commonly encountered in the patient with intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. Accurate assessment and optimization of preload, contractility, and afterload, in conjunction with appropriate goal-directed resuscitation and abdominal decompression when indicated, are essential to restoring end-organ perfusion and maximizing patient survival. The validity of traditional hemodynamic resuscitation endpoints, such as pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure, must be reconsidered in the patient with intra-abdominal hypertension as these pressure-based estimates of intravascular volume have significant limitations in patients with elevated intra-abdominal pressure. If such limitations are not recognized, misinterpretation of the patient's cardiac status is likely, resulting in inappropriate and potentially detrimental therapy. Appropriate fluid administration is mandatory as under-resuscitation leads to organ failure and over-resuscitation the development of secondary abdominal compartment syndrome, both of which are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Volumetric monitoring techniques have been proven to be superior to traditional intra-cardiac filling pressures in directing the appropriate resuscitation of this patient population. Calculation of the "abdominal perfusion pressure", defined as mean arterial pressure minus intra-abdominal pressure, has been shown to be a beneficial resuscitation endpoint as it assesses not only the severity of the patient's intra-abdominal hypertension, but also the adequacy of abdominal blood flow. Application of a goal-directed resuscitation strategy, including abdominal decompression when indicated, improves cardiac function, reverses end-organ failure, and minimizes intra-abdominal hypertension-related patient morbidity and mortality.

ICU management of the patient with intra-abdominal hypertension: what to do, when and to whom?

INTRODUCTION

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are increasingly recognised to be a contributing cause of organ dysfunction and mortality in critically ill patients. The number of publications describing and researching this phenomenon is increasing exponentially but there are still very limited data about treatment and outcome.

METHODS

This review will focus on the available literature from the last years. A Medline and PubMed search was performed using the search terms "abdominal compartment syndrome" and "treatment".

RESULTS

This search yielded 437 references, most of which were not relevant to the subject of this paper. The remaining abstracts were screened and selected on the basis of relevance, methodology and number of cases. Full text articles of the selected abstracts were used to supplement the authors' expert opinion and experience. The abdomino-thoracic transmission of pressure has direct clinical consequences on the cardiovascular, respiratory and central nervous systems in terms of monitoring and management. These interactions are discussed and treatment recommendations are made. IAH-induced renal dysfunction is addressed as a separate issue. Finally, an overview of non-invasive measures to decrease IAP is given.

CONCLUSION

This paper describes current insights on management of IAP induced organ dysfunction and lists the most widely used and published non-invasive techniques to decrease IAP with their limitations and pitfalls.

Is stroke volume variation a useful preload index in liver transplant recipients? A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) is a good indicator of preload in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Although dynamic indices, such as stroke volume variation (SVV), have been used as reliable indicators in predicting fluid responsiveness, the evaluation of the relationship between SVV and direct preload status is limited. We investigated the relationship between SVV and RVEDVI, and tested the cutoff value of SVV to predict RVEDVI during liver transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 150 data pairs in 30 living donor liver transplant recipients were retrospectively investigated. Hemodynamic parameters, including SVV and RVEDVI were obtained from each patient at the 5 specific time points. Linear regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The SVV significantly correlated with the RVEDVI (r = -0.616, P < 0.001). Cutoff values for the upper and lower tertiles of RVEDVI were 157 mL/m(2) and 128 mL/m(2), respectively. Tertile analysis indicated that upper tertile of RVEDVI had a significantly lower SVV than the middle tertile (median; 5% vs 8%, P < 0.05), and middle tertile of RVEDVI had a significantly lower SVV than the lower tertile (median; 8% vs 11%, P < 0.05). A 6% cutoff value of SVV estimated the upper tertile RVEDVI (>157 mL/m(2)) with the area under the curve of ROC curve of 0.832. A 9% cutoff value of SVV estimated the lower tertile RVEDVI (<128 mL/m(2)) with the area under the curve of ROC curve of 0.792.

CONCLUSION

SVV may be a valuable estimator of RVEDVI in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Relationship between Abdominal Pressure, Pulmonary Compliance, and Cardiac Preload in a Porcine Model

Rationale. Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) may compromise respiratory and cardiovascular function by abdomino-thoracic pressure transmission. We aimed (1) to study the effects of elevated IAP on pleural pressure, (2) to understand the implications for lung and chest wall compliances and (3) to determine whether volumetric filling parameters may be more accurate than classical pressure-based filling pressures for preload assessment in the setting of elevated IAP. Methods. In eleven pigs, IAP was increased stepwise from 6 to 30 mmHg. Hemodynamic, esophageal, and pulmonary pressures were recorded. Results. 17% (end-expiratory) to 62% (end-inspiratory) of elevated IAP was transmitted to the thoracic compartment. Respiratory system compliance decreased significantly with elevated IAP and chest wall compliance decreased. Central venous and pulmonary wedge pressure increased with increasing IAP and correlated inversely (r = -0.31) with stroke index (SI). Global end-diastolic volume index was unaffected by IAP and correlated best with SI (r = 0.52). Conclusions. Increased IAP is transferred to the thoracic compartment and results in a decreased respiratory system compliance due to decreased chest wall compliance. Volumetric filling parameters and transmural filling pressures are clearly superior to classical cardiac filling pressures in the assessment of cardiac preload during elevated IAP.

Haemodynamic response to abdominal decompression in acute Budd-Chiari syndrome

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome commonly occur in patients with liver disease.

AIMS

We compared haemodynamic variables pre- and post-abdominal decompression in patients with acute Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), ascites and IAH.

METHODS

Patients with IAH admitted to the Liver ICU, King's College Hospital were studied. Transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (CO) monitoring was performed with the PiCCO(®) system.

RESULTS

Ten patients with decompensated BCS (median age 39 years, 20-52) and eight patients with CLD (59 years, 33-65) and tense ascites requiring paracentesis were studied. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was raised in both groups pre-intervention (BSC 23 mmHg, 17-40; CLD 26, 20-40). Intrathoracic blood volume (ITBVI) was persistently low in the BCS group (632 ml/m(2) , 453-924) despite volume resuscitation. Post-intervention, reduction in IAP was noted in both groups (BCS P<0.001, CLD P<0.0001). The ITBVI increased (P=0.001) in the BCS group only. An increase in cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume index (SVI) was noted in both groups (BCS: CI P=0.003, SVI: P=0.007; CLD: CI P=0.005, SVI P=0.02). The central venous pressure did not change in either group and did not correlate with markers of flow (CI, SVI) or IAP. Both groups demonstrated an inverse relationship between IAP, CI and SVI.

CONCLUSION

Patients with BCS and IAH have evidence of central hypovolaemia. In addition to raised IAP, hepatic venous obstruction and caudate lobe hypertrophy limit venous return in patients with BCS. Reduction in IAP and re-establishment of caval flow restores preload with improvement in CO.

Understanding Intra-Abdominal Hypertension

Received November 10, 2009. Received Revised June 17, 2010. Submitted June 21, 2010. Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are highly morbid conditions that are common and underrecognized in the intensive care unit. Intra-abdominal hypertension affects the critically ill patient population and is not solely limited to the trauma and surgical subgroups. The recognition of IAH and ACS as distinct clinical states has become more apparent. Extensive bench and clinical research has shed significant light into the definition, incidence, etiology, physiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment strategies. Although further research into this morbid condition is needed, improvement in recognition is a critical first step. This review aims to scrutinize the basic science and clinical literature available on this condition in a surgically focused, organ-system-based approach.

Damage control in trauma and abdominal sepsis

Damage control surgery, initially formalized <20 yrs ago, was developed to overcome the poor outcomes in exsanguinating abdominal trauma with traditional surgical approaches. The core concepts for damage control of hemorrhage and contamination control with abbreviated laparotomy followed by resuscitation before definitive repair, although simple in nature, have led to an alteration in which emergent surgery is handled among a multitude of problems, including abdominal sepsis and battlefield surgery. With the aggressive resuscitation associated with damage control surgery, understanding of abdominal compartment syndrome has expanded. It is probably through avoiding this clinical entity that the greatest improvement in surgical outcomes for various emergent surgical problems has occurred in the past two decades. However, with its success, new problems have emerged, including increases in enterocutaneous fistulas and open abdomens. But as with any crisis, innovative strategies are being developed. New approaches to control of the open abdomen and reconstruction of the abdominal wall are being developed from negative pressure dressing therapies to acellular allograft meshes. With further understanding of new resuscitative strategies, the need for damage control surgery may decline, along with its concomitant complications, at the same time retaining the success that damage control surgery has brought to the critically ill trauma and general surgery patient in the past few years.

Fechamento de laparostomia com descolamento cutâneo-adiposo: uma técnica simples e eficaz para um problema complexo

OBJETIVO: Descrever uma técnica de fechamento de laparostomia através de descolamento cutâneo-adiposo e os resultados obtidos. MÉTODOS: Entre janeiro de 2003 a outubro de 2008 quarenta pacientes laparostomizados com silo plástico (bolsa de Bogotá) foram fechados usando-se a técnica descrita neste trabalho. Dados foram coletados dos prontuários e da busca ativa após alta hospitalar. RESULTADOS: A maioria dos pacientes eram homens (95%), com trauma por arma de fogo (70%). As médias de ISS e APACHE II foram de 28,78 e 20, respectivamente. Hérnia ventral ocorreu em 81,5% dos pacientes, num intervalo médio de seguimento de 9,2 meses. Aproximadamente 1/3 dos pacientes apresentavam hérnias pequenas e não desejavam corrigi-las quando questionados. Somente dois pacientes estavam insatisfeitos com o procedimento em relação a atividades cotidianas e aspectos estéticos. Não houve óbitos ou fístulas intestinais em decorrência do fechamento. CONCLUSÃO: Embora não represente uma técnica de fechamento mioaponeurótico, o descolamento cutâneo-adiposo é simples, seguro e de baixo custo. É uma boa opção terapêutica para os pacientes laparostomizados, principalmente quando o fechamento da aponeurose não for possível nos primeiros 7 a 10 dias.

Global and right ventricular end-diastolic volumes correlate better with preload after correction for ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Volumetric monitoring with right ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed (RVEDVi) and global end-diastolic volume indexed (GEDVi) is increasingly being suggested as a superior preload indicator compared with the filling pressures central venous pressure (CVP) or the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). However, static monitoring of these volumetric parameters has not consistently been shown to be able to predict changes in cardiac index (CI). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a correction of RVEDVi and GEDVi with a measure of the individual contractile reserve, assessed by right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and global ejection fraction, improves the ability of RVEDVi and GEDVi to monitor changes in preload over time in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Hemodynamic measurements, both by pulmonary artery and by transcardiopulmonary thermodilution, were performed in 11 mechanically ventilated medical ICU patients. Correction of volumes was achieved by normalization to EF deviation from normal EF values in an exponential fashion. Data before and after fluid administration were obtained in eight patients, while data before and after diuretics were obtained in seven patients.

RESULTS

No correlation was found between the change in cardiac filling pressures (DeltaCVP, DeltaPCWP) and DeltaCI (R(2) 0.01 and 0.00, respectively). Further, no correlation was found between DeltaRVEDVi or DeltaGEDVi and DeltaCI (R(2) 0.10 and 0.13, respectively). In contrast, a significant correlation was found between DeltaRVEDVi corrected to RVEF (DeltacRVEDVi) and DeltaCI (R(2) 0.64), as well as between DeltacGEDVi and DeltaCI (R(2) 0.59). An increase in the net fluid balance with +844 + or - 495 ml/m(2) resulted in a significant increase in CI of 0.5 + or - 0.3 l/min/m(2); however, only DeltacRVEDVi (R(2) 0.58) and DeltacGEDVi (R(2) 0.36) correlated significantly with DeltaCI. Administration of diuretics resulting in a net fluid balance of -942 + or - 658 ml/m(2) caused a significant decrease in CI with 0.7 + or - 0.5 l/min/m(2); however, only DeltacRVEDVi (R(2) 0.80) and DeltacGEDVi (R(2) 0.61) correlated significantly with DeltaCI.

CONCLUSION

Correction of volumetric preload parameters by measures of ejection fraction improved the ability of these parameters to assess changes in preload over time in this heterogeneous group of critically ill patients.

Continuous right ventricular end-diastolic volume in comparison with left ventricular end-diastolic area

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative management of patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation requires fluid administration to increase cardiac output and oxygen delivery to the tissues. Filling pressures have been widely shown to correlate poorly with changes in cardiac output in the critically ill patient. Continuous right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (cRVEDVI) and left ventricular end-diastolic area index (LVEDAI) monitoring have been increasingly used for preload assessment. The aim of this study was to compare cRVEDVI, LVEDAI, central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure with respect to stroke volume index (SVI) during liver transplantation.

METHODS

Measurements were made in 20 patients at four predefined steps during liver transplantation. Univariate and multivariate panel-data fixed effect regression models (across phases of the surgical procedure) were fitted to assess associations between SVI and cRVEDVI, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, central venous pressure and LVEDAI after adjusting for ejection fraction (categorized as <or=30, 31-40, >40).

RESULTS

SVI was associated with continuous right ventricular ejection fraction. The model showing the best fit to the data was that including cRVEDVI: even after adjusting for continuous right ventricular ejection fraction and phase, the regression coefficient of cRVEDVI in predicting SVI was statistically significant and indicated an increase in SVI of 0.21 ml m(-2) for each increase of 1 ml m(-2). At the multivariate analysis, an increase in LVEDAI of 1 cm m(-2) led to an increase in SVI of 1.47 ml m(-2) (P = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

cRVEDVI and LVEDAI gave a better reflection of preload than filling pressure, even if only cRVEDVI reached statistical significance.

Abdominal compartment syndrome: pathophysiology and definitions

"Intra-abdominal hypertension", the presence of elevated intra-abdominal pressure, and "abdominal compartment syndrome", the development of pressure-induced organ-dysfunction and failure, have been increasingly recognized over the past decade as causes of significant morbidity and mortality among critically ill surgical and medical patients. Elevated intra-abdominal pressure can cause significant impairment of cardiac, pulmonary, renal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, and central nervous system function. The significant prognostic value of elevated intra-abdominal pressure has prompted many intensive care units to adopt measurement of this physiologic parameter as a routine vital sign in patients at risk. A thorough understanding of the pathophysiologic implications of elevated intra-abdominal pressure is fundamental to 1) recognizing the presence of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome, 2) effectively resuscitating patients afflicted by these potentially life-threatening diseases, and 3) preventing the development of intra-abdominal pressure-induced end-organ dysfunction and failure. The currently accepted consensus definitions surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome are presented.

Reliability of continuous cardiac output measurement during intra-abdominal hypertension relies on repeated calibrations: an experimental animal study

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring cardiac output (CO) may allow early detection of haemodynamic instability, aiming to reduce morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Continuous cardiac output (CCO) monitoring is recommended in septic or postoperative patients with high incidences of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). The aim of the present study was to compare the agreement between three CCO methods and a bolus thermodilution CO technique during acute IAH and volume loading.

METHODS

Ten pigs were anaesthetised and instrumented for haemodynamic measurements. Cardiac output was obtained using CCO by pulse power analysis (PulseCO; LiDCO monitor), using CCO by pulse contour analysis (PCCO; PiCCO monitor) and using CCO by pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (CCOPAC), and was compared with bolus transcardiopulmonary thermodilution CO (COTCP) at baseline, after fluid loading, at IAH and after an additional fluid loading at IAH. Whereas PulseCO was only calibrated at baseline, PCCO was calibrated at each experimental step.

RESULTS

PulseCO and PCCO underestimated CO, as the overall bias +/- standard deviation was 1.0 +/- 1.5 l/min and 1.0 +/- 1.1 l/min compared with COTCP. A clinically accepted agreement between all of the CCO methods and COTCP was observed only at baseline. Whereas IAH did not influence the CO, increased CO following fluid loading at IAH was only reflected by CCOPAC and COTCP, not by uncalibrated PulseCO and PCCO. After recalibration, PCCO was comparable with COTCP.

CONCLUSIONS

The CO obtained by uncalibrated PulseCO and PCCO failed to agree with COTCP during IAH and fluid loading. In the critically ill patient, recalibration of continuous arterial waveform CO methods should be performed after fluid loading or before a major change in therapy is initiated.

Abdominal compartment syndrome: a concise clinical review

OBJECTIVE

There has been an increased awareness of the presence and clinical importance of abdominal compartment syndrome. It is now appreciated that elevations of abdominal pressure occur in a wide variety of critically ill patients. Full-blown abdominal compartment syndrome is a clinical syndrome characterized by progressive intra-abdominal organ dysfunction resulting from elevated intra-abdominal pressure. This review provides a current, clinically focused approach to the diagnosis and management of abdominal compartment syndrome, with a particular emphasis on intensive care.

METHODS

Source data were obtained from a PubMed search of the medical literature, with an emphasis on the time period after 2000. PubMed "related articles" search strategies were likewise employed frequently. Additional information was derived from the Web site of the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (http://www.wsacs.org).

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The detrimental impact of elevated intra-abdominal pressure, progressing to abdominal compartment syndrome, is recognized in both surgical and medical intensive care units. The recent international abdominal compartment syndrome consensus conference has helped to define, characterize, and raise awareness of abdominal compartment syndrome. Because of the frequency of this condition, routine measurement of intra-abdominal pressure should be performed in high-risk patients in the intensive care unit. Evidence-based interventions can be used to minimize the risk of developing elevated intra-abdominal pressure and to aggressively treat intra-abdominal hypertension when identified. Surgical decompression remains the gold standard for rapid, definitive treatment of fully developed abdominal compartment syndrome, but nonsurgical measures can often effectively affect lesser degrees of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.

Continuous right ventricular end diastolic volume and right ventricular ejection fraction during liver transplantation: a multicenter study

Cardiac preload is traditionally considered to be represented by its filling pressures, but more recently, estimations of end diastolic volume of the left or right ventricle have been shown to better reflect preload. One method of determining volumes is the evaluation of the continuous right ventricular end diastolic volume index (cRVEDVI) on the basis of the cardiac output thermodilution technique. Because preload and myocardial contractility are the main factors determining cardiac output during liver transplantation (LTx), accurate determination of preload is important. Thus, monitoring of cRVEDVI and cRVEF should help with fluid management and with the assessment of the need for inotropic and vasoactive agents. In this multicenter study, we looked for possible relationships between the stroke volume index (SVI) and cRVEDVI, cRVEF, and filling pressures at 4 predefined steps in 244 patients undergoing LTx. Univariate and multivariate autoregression models (across phases of the surgical procedure) were fitted to assess the possible association between SVI and cRVEDVI, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), and central venous pressure (CVP) after adjustment for cRVEF (categorized as < or =30, 31-40, and >40%). SVI was strongly associated with both cRVEDVI and cRVEF. The model showing the best fit to the data was that including cRVEDVI. Even after adjustment for cRVEF, there was a statistically significant (P < 0.05) relationship between SVI and cRVEDVI with a regression coefficient (slope of the regression line) of 0.25; this meant that an increase in cRVEDVI of 1 mL m(-2) resulted in an increase in SVI of 0.25 mL m(-2). The correlations between SVI and CVP and PAOP were less strong. We conclude that cRVEDVI reflected preload better than CVP and PAOP.

Abdomino-thoracic transmission during acs: facts and figures

Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) exerts effects not only on intra-abdominal organs, but also on organs distant to the abdominal compartment. Abdomino-thoracic interaction during intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) or abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) interferes with pulmonary, cardiovascular and cerebral function. In accordance with recent guidelines, IAH is defined as IAP above 12 mmHg and ACS as IAP more than 20 mmHg with one or more new organ failures. In this review we will first discuss the effects of elevated IAP on pulmonary dynamics and the relevance for interpreting airway pressures and adjusting ventilator settings. We will then discuss the interaction between abdomino-thoracic pressure transmission and global haemodynamics, the knowledge of which is necessary for correct assessment of cardiac preload and to optimize fluid therapy in the setting of IAH/ACS. A discussion on the relationship between increased IAP, increased intracranial pressure (ICP) and decreased cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) will follow. Finally, we will review ventilator-induced thoracic pressure swings and their transmission to the abdominal compartment.

Haemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure

Acute Heart Failure is a major cause of hospitalisation, with a rate of death and complications. New guidelines have been developed in order to diagnose and treat this disease. Despite these efforts pathophysiology and treatments options are still limited. There is agreement among the experts that increasing the cardiac output and the stroke volume without fluid overloading the patient should be the goal of every treatment. Despite this, there is no agreement on how to monitor the cardiac function and how to follow it after a therapeutic intervention. In other fields of critical care cardiovascular monitoring and application of early goal directed protocols showed benefits. This review explores the available possibilities of how to monitor the cardiac function in Acute Heart Failure. Standard and more advanced techniques are presented. Cardiac output monitors from the pulmonary artery catheter to the pulse pressure analysis and Doppler techniques are discussed, with focus on this specific clinical setting. Undoubtedly monitoring is valuable tool, but without a protocol of how to manipulate the haemodynamics, no monitor will prove alone to be beneficial. Haemodynamic driven early goal directed therapy are largely awaited in this field of medicine.

Cardiac ultrasound and abdominal compartment syndrome

This review focuses on the available literature published about the evaluation of haemodynamic consequences of the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Animal and clinical studies described decreased venous return, systemic vasoconstriction, systolic and diastolic dysfunction of left and right ventricles. Doppler echocardiography is a non-invasive bedside procedure which provides a complete haemodynamic evaluation of patients with ACS. Despite numerous evaluations in anesthesia during laparoscopic surgery, the use of echocardiography remains scarce in critically ill patients with ACS.

Intravesicular pressure monitoring does not cause urinary tract infection

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intravesicular pressure monitoring using a closed system increases the risk of nosocomial urinary tract infection.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart and database review.

SETTING

Surgical/trauma intensive care units of a regional level-I trauma center.

PATIENTS

3108 critically ill patients of which 122 patients underwent intravesicular pressure monitoring.

INTERVENTIONS

Severity-adjusted urinary tract infection rates were compared among patients with and without intravesicular pressure monitoring.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Over a 24-month period, 122 consecutive patients had 2202 intravesicular pressure measurements performed. During 1448 urinary catheter days, 15 patients who required intravesicular pressure monitoring developed a urinary tract infection with a severity-adjusted device-related infection rate of 7.9 infections per 1000 catheter days. Of the 2986 patients who did not require such monitoring, 98 patients developed a urinary tract infection with an infection rate of 6.5 infections per 1000 catheter days (p=0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravesicular pressure monitoring using the closed transducer technique is safe and does not increase the risk of urinary tract infection.

Evaluation of a modified piezoresistive technique and a water-capsule technique for direct and continuous measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in a porcine model

OBJECTIVE

Intravesical pressure measurement is considered to be the gold standard for the assessment of intra-abdominal pressure. However, this method is indirect and depends on a physiologic bladder function. We evaluated a modified piezoresistive technique and a water-capsule technique for direct and continuous intra-abdominal pressure measurement.

DESIGN

Experimental study.

SETTING

Animal research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Eleven male domestic pigs.

INTERVENTIONS

In anesthetized and mechanically ventilated animals, CO2 was insufflated to stepwise increase the intra-abdominal pressure to 30 mm Hg. Pressure was then held constant for 9 hrs followed by decompression. Piezoresistive measurement and water-capsule measurement probes were placed intra-abdominally.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Readings of intravesical pressure measurement, piezoresistive measurement, and water-capsule measurement were taken hourly. Mean difference to insufflator readings, confidence intervals, and limits of agreement were calculated. Differences between applied pressure and intra-abdominal pressure readings were assessed using a two-factor analysis of variance. No significant differences between methods could be observed. During stepwise pressure increase, limits of agreements were -3.6 to 3.6 mm Hg. Confidence intervals were -3.4 to 3.5 (intravesical pressure measurement), -1.6 to 1.5 (piezoresistive measurement), and 0.5 to 2.9 mm Hg (water-capsule measurement). In the presence of constantly elevated intra-abdominal pressure, limits of agreement ranged from -8.2 to +8.2 mm Hg. Confidence intervals were -0.4 to 6.2 (intravesical pressure measurement), -0.2 to 2.7 (piezoresistive measurement), and 1.1 to 5.1 mm Hg (water-capsule measurement).

CONCLUSIONS

Both piezoresistive measurement and water-capsule measurement had smaller confidence intervals than intravesical pressure measurement, indicating higher precision, whereas water-capsule measurement had a significant offset. Piezoresistive measurement could be the most suitable device for continuous direct intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in specific patients.

Fluid resuscitation preserves cardiac output but cannot prevent organ damage in a porcine model during 24 h of intraabdominal hypertension

According to a previous study, a pathologically increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) reduces cardiac output (CO) and results in medium- to high-grade organ damage in a porcine model of the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether fluid resuscitation can preserve organ integrity together with CO. We examined 12 domestic pigs with a mean body weight of 48 kg. We used a CO2 pneumoperitoneum to increase the IAP to 30 mmHg in 6 animals, and the others served as control group. The investigation period was 24 h. In addition to a standard infusion regimen, Ringer's solution was infused to maintain CO at the level of control animals. Hemodynamic parameters (ITBV, EVLW, MAP, CVP), urine output, inspiratory pressure, as well as serum parameters (e.g., ALT, lipase, AP, lactate, creatinine) were recorded. In the end histological examination of liver, bowel, kidney, and lung was performed. CO, ITBV, EVLW, and urine output did not change when compared with control. Fluid intake was increased (P < 0.01) when compared with control (10,570 +/- 1,928 vs. 3,918 +/- 1,042 mL). CVP, MAP, and inspiratory pressure were increased. Serum parameters did not change. Acidosis occurred in the study group. Liver, bowel, kidney, and lung displayed mean- to high-grade damage (P < 0.01). Although extensive fluid resuscitation preserved CO, diuresis, and serum parameters in this previously described model of the ACS, organ damage occurred. In the clinical regard, these results support decompressive treatment in the presence of pathologically high IAP despite "normalized" parameters.

Incidence and prognosis of intraabdominal hypertension in a mixed population of critically ill patients: a multiple-center epidemiological study

OBJECTIVE

Intraabdominal hypertension is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in surgical and trauma patients. The aim of this study was to assess, in a mixed population of critically ill patients, whether intraabdominal pressure at admission was an independent predictor for mortality and to evaluate the effects of intraabdominal hypertension on organ functions.

DESIGN

Multiple-center, prospective epidemiologic study.

SETTING

Fourteen intensive care units in six countries.

PATIENTS

A total of 265 consecutive patients admitted for >24 hrs during the 4-wk study period.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Intraabdominal pressure was measured twice daily via the bladder. Data recorded on admission were the patient demographics with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and type of admission; during intensive care stay, Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment score and intraabdominal pressure were measured daily together with fluid balance. Nonsurvivors had a significantly higher mean intraabdominal pressure on admission than survivors: 11.4 +/- 4.8 vs. 9.5 +/- 4.8 mm Hg. Independent predictors for mortality were age (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06; p = .003), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.15; p < .0001), type of intensive care unit admission (odds ratio, 2.5 medical vs. surgical; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-5.16; p = .01), and the presence of liver dysfunction (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.8; p = .04). The occurrence of intraabdominal hypertension during the intensive care unit stay was also an independent predictor of mortality (relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.06; p = .01). Patients with intraabdominal hypertension at admission had significantly higher Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment scores during the intensive care unit stay than patients without intraabdominal hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraabdominal hypertension on admission was associated with severe organ dysfunction during the intensive care unit stay. The mean intraabdominal pressure on admission was not an independent risk factor for mortality; however, the occurrence of intraabdominal hypertension during the intensive care unit stay was an independent outcome predictor.

Effects of continuous negative extra-abdominal pressure on cardiorespiratory function during abdominal hypertension: an experimental study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether negative extra-abdominal pressure (NEXAP) improves respiratory function and induces a blood shift from the intrathoracic compartment and to assess whether these effects are influenced by abdominal pressure.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial in the animal laboratory of a university hospital.

SUBJECTS

Eight sedated and paralyzed pigs (19.6+/-3.4 kg).

INTERVENTIONS

Application of NEXAP (-20 cmH(2)O).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Airway, esophageal, gastric and central venous pressures were recorded simultaneously. Intrathoracic blood volume was assessed by PiCCO. The effects of NEXAP were assessed with and without abdominal hypertension by intraperitoneal insufflation of helium. NEXAP caused a lasting drop of gastric (1.97+/-2.26 mmHg) and esophageal (1.21+/-0.67 mmHg) pressures, while end-expiratory airway pressure was similar, hence transpulmonary pressure increased. Intrathoracic blood volume dropped from 358+/-47 to 314+/-47 ml. The fall was associated with a decrease in central venous pressure (R(2)=0.820). When peritoneal pressure was raised (24.7+/-5.5 mmHg), the effects were less marked. However, the difference between negative pressure around the abdomen and the pressure inside the abdomen (effective NEXAP) was correlated with the proportional changes in intrathoracic blood volume (R(2)=0.648), being greater with more negative effective NEXAP. NEXAP improved chest wall elastance during abdominal hypertension (from 0.067+/-0.023 to 0.056+/-0.021 cmH(2)O/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

NEXAP increases lung volume and causes a shift of blood from the intrathoracic compartment. It needs to be tailored against abdominal pressure to be effective.

Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome

The pressure within the abdominal cavity is normally little more than atmospheric pressure. However, even small increases in intra-abdominal pressure can have adverse effects on renal function, cardiac output, hepatic blood flow, respiratory mechanics, splanchnic perfusion and intracranial pressure. Although intra-abdominal pressure can be measured directly, this is invasive and bedside measurement of intra-abdominal pressure is usually achieved via the urinary bladder. This cheap, easy approach has been shown to produce results that correlate closely with directly measured abdominal pressures. Significant increases in intra-abdominal pressure are seen in a wide variety of conditions commonly encountered in the intensive care unit, such as ruptured aortic aneurysm, abdominal trauma and acute pancreatitis. Abdominal compartment syndrome describes the combination of increased intra-abdominal pressure and end-organ dysfunction. This syndrome has a high mortality, most deaths resulting from sepsis and multi-organ failure. Detection of abdominal compartment syndrome requires close surveillance of intra-abdominal pressure in patients thought to be at risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension. The only available treatment for established abdominal compartment syndrome is decompressive laparotomy. Prevention of abdominal compartment syndrome after laparotomy by adoption of an open abdomen approach may be preferable in the patient at significant risk of developing intra-abdominal hypertension, but this has not been demonstrated in any large trials. Most surgeons prefer to adopt a 'wait and see' policy, only intervening when clinical deterioration is associated with a significant increase in intra-abdominal pressure.

Is it wise not to think about intraabdominal hypertension in the ICU?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the available literature published in the past 2 years. MEDLINE and PubMed searches were performed using intraabdominal pressure, intraabdominal hypertension, and abdominal compartment as search items. The aim was to find an answer to the question: "Is it wise not to measure or even not to think about intraabdominal hypertension in ICU?"

RECENT FINDINGS

It is difficult to find a good gold standard for intraabdominal pressure measurement. Bladder pressure can be used as an intraabdominal pressure estimate provided it is measured in a reproducible way. Automated continuous intraabdominal pressure monitoring has recently become available. Key messages are (1). body mass index and fluid resuscitation are independent predictors of intraabdominal hypertension; (2). intraabdominal hypertension increases intrathoracic, intracranial, and intracardiac filling pressures; (3). transmural or transabdominal filling pressures combined with volumetric parameters better reflect preload; (4). volumetric target values need to be corrected for baseline ejection fractions; (5). intraabdominal hypertension decreases left ventricular, chest wall and total respiratory system compliance; (6). best positive end-expiratory pressure can be set to counteract intraabdominal pressure; (7). acute respiratory distress syndrome definitions should take into account best positive end-expiratory pressure and intraabdominal pressure but not wedge pressure; (8). lung protective strategies should aim at deltaPplat (plateau pressure - intraabdominal pressure); (9). intraabdominal hypertension causes atelectasis and increases extravascular lung water; (10). intraabdominal hypertension is an independent predictor of acute renal failure; (11). monitoring of abdominal perfusion pressure can be useful; and (12). intraabdominal hypertension triggers bacterial translocation and multiple organ system failure.

SUMMARY

The answer is that it is unwise not to measure intraabdominal pressure in the ICU or even not to think about it.

PRELOAD OPTIMIZATION USING “STARLING CURVE” GENERATION DURING SHOCK RESUSCITATION: CAN IT BE DONE?

Preload-directed resuscitation is the standard of care in U.S. trauma centers. As part of our standardized protocol for traumatic shock resuscitation, patients who do not respond to initial interventions of hemoglobin replacement and fluid volume loading have optimal preload determined using a standardized algorithm to generate a "Starling curve." We retrospectively analyzed data from 147 consecutive resuscitation protocol patients during the 24 months ending August 2002. Fifty (34%) of these patients required preload optimization, of which the optimization algorithm was completed in 36 (72%). The average age of those who required preload optimization was 44 +/- 3 years vs. 34 +/- 1 years for patients who did not. Execution of the algorithm caused PCWP to increase from 18 +/- 1 mmHg to a maximum of 25 +/- 2 mmHg and CI to increase from 3.2 +/- 0.1 L/min m(-2) to 4.5 +/- 0.4 L/min m(-2). Algorithm logic determined PCWP = 24 +/- 2 to be optimal preload at the maximum CI = 4.8 +/- 0.4, and as the volume loading threshold for the remaining time of the resuscitation process. Starling curve preload optimization was begun 6.5 +/- 0.8 h after start of the resuscitation protocol and required 36 +/- 5 min and 4 +/- 0.4 fluid boluses (1.6 +/- 0.2 L). Comparison of early response of those patients who required preload optimization and those who did not indicated hemodynamic compromise apparent in the 1st 4 h of standardized resuscitation. We conclude that preload optimization using sequential fluid bolus and PCWP-CI measurement to generate a Starling curve is feasible during ICU shock resuscitation, but that there is the disadvantage that increasing and maintaining high PCWP may contribute to problematic tissue edema.

Long-Term Physical, Mental, and Functional Consequences of Abdominal Decompression

BACKGROUND

The long-term physical, mental, and functional consequences of abdominal decompression for intra-abdominal hypertension are unknown.

METHODS

Thirty patients in various stages of abdominal decompression and delayed fascial closure for massive incisional hernia completed the SF-36 Health Survey and answered questions regarding their employment and pregnancy status.

RESULTS

Patients awaiting abdominal wall reconstruction demonstrated significantly decreased perceptions of physical, social, and emotional health (p < 0.05), whereas patients who had completed definitive fascial closure demonstrated physical and mental health scores equivalent to the U.S. general population. Ultimately, 78% of patients employed before decompression returned to work.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal decompression with skin grafting and delayed fascial closure initially decreases patient perception of physical, social, and emotional health, but subsequent abdominal wall reconstruction restores physical and mental health to that of the U.S. general population. Abdominal decompression does not prevent return to gainful employment and should not be considered a permanently disabling condition.

Special issues in plastic and reconstructive surgery

Intensivists frequently collaborate with plastic and reconstructive surgeons in treating patients with major wounds, following significant reconstructive procedures, and following free-tissue transfers. Pressure ulcers are a significant source of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit; prevention, early recognition, and multidisciplinary treatment are critical components for successful management. Necrotizing fasciitis is an aggressive, soft-tissue infection that requires rapid diagnosis, early surgical intervention frequent operative debridements, and soft-tissue reconstruction Catastrophic abdominal injuries and infections can be treated with an open abdominal approach and require the expertise of a plastic surgeon to reconstruct the abdominal wall. The success of free-tissue transfers and complex reconstructive procedures requires a thorough understanding of the factors that improve flap survival.

Systemic inflammatory response secondary to abdominal compartment syndrome: stage for multiple organ failure

BACKGROUND

The abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of postinjury multiple organ failure. The ACS is defined as intra-abdominal hypertension causing adverse physiologic response. This study was designed to determine the effects of IAH on the production of interleukin-1b (IL-1beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha), and the effects on remote organ injury.

METHODS

IAH was induced in Sprague-Dawley rats which were divided into 5 groups, 10 animals each. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was increased to 20 mm Hg for 60 and 90 minutes in two different groups. In a third group following IAP of 20 mm Hg the abdomen was decompressed for 30 minutes before samples were collected. The other animals were used as controls. Hemodynamic response was monitored throughout the procedure. Cytokine levels were assessed in the plasma. Remote organ injury was assessed by histopathology and myeloperoxidase activity.

RESULTS

IAH caused a significant decrease in MAP. After abdominal decompression MAP returned to baseline levels. A significant decrease in arterial pH was also noted. Increase in the levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6 was noted 30 minutes after abdominal decompression. Plasma concentration of IL-1b was elevated after 60 minutes of IAH. Abdominal decompression, however, did not cause a significant increase in the levels of this cytokine. Lung neutrophil accumulation was significantly elevated only after abdominal decompression. Histopathological findings showed intense pulmonary inflammatory infiltration including atelectasis and alveolar edema.

CONCLUSIONS

IAH provokes the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines which may serve as a second insult for the induction of MOF.

Mathematical coupling does not explain the relationship between right ventricular end-diastolic volume and cardiac output

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical significance of mathematical coupling on the correlation between cardiac output and right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) through measurement of cardiac output by two independent techniques.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

Surgical intensive care unit in a level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-eight critically ill surgical patients who received mechanical ventilation and hemodynamic monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter.

INTERVENTIONS

A pulmonary artery catheter designed to measure right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and cardiac output by the intermittent bolus thermodilution (TDCO) method and continuous cardiac output by the pulsed thermal energy technique was placed. A computerized data logger was used to collect data simultaneously from the RVEF/TDCO system and the continuous cardiac output system.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred forty-nine data sets from 28 patients were compared. There is statistical correlation between TDCO and continuous cardiac output measurements (r = 0.95, p < 0.0001) with an acceptable bias (-0.11 L/min) and precision (+/-0.74 L/min). The correlation was maintained over a wide range of cardiac outputs (2.3-17.8 L/min). There is a high degree of correlation between RVEDV and both TDCO (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) and independently measured continuous cardiac output (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001). These correlation coefficients are not statistically different (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

The continuous cardiac output technique accurately approximates cardiac output measured by the TDCO method. RVEDV calculated from TDCO correlates well with both TDCO and independently measured continuous cardiac output. Because random measurement errors of the two techniques differ, mathematical coupling alone does not explain the correlation between RVEDV estimates of preload and cardiac output.

[Abdominal compartment syndrome]

French physicians dealing with abdominal emergencies are not very familiar with the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Increased abdominal pressure has deleterious consequences on local (intestine, liver, kidney) circulation, leading to death in the absence of correct treatment. Abdominal trauma and ruptured aortic aneurism are the main causes of ACS. Clinical presentation may be misleading: respiratory failure, oliguria or circulatory symptoms are often predominant. Abdominal palpation is inefficient for evaluating intra-abdominal pressure (IAP); only measurement of cystic pressure allows precise evaluation of IAP. Abdominal decompression is the treatment of choice. It must be performed as soon as IAP exceeds 25 mmHg. The procedure may be risky with a high incidence of severe complications when ischaemic territories are reperfused. Recent data underline the importance of compensation of hypovolemia before decompression. Abdominal closure may necessitate various techniques (aponevrotomy, Bogota bags, etc.). At any rate, IAP must remain low at the end of the procedure. In case of suspicion of ACS, early measurement of IAP is mandatory. If pressure is over 25 mmHg, a decompressive procedure must be initiated.

Estimation of intra-abdominal pressure by bladder pressure measurement: validity and methodology

BACKGROUND

Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is an adverse complication seen in critically ill, injured, and postoperative patients. IAP is estimated via the measurement of bladder pressure. Few studies have been performed to establish the actual relationship between IAP and bladder pressure. The purpose of this study was to confirm the association between intravesicular pressure and IAP and to determine the bladder volume that best approximates IAP.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients undergoing laparoscopy had intravesicular pressures measured with bladder volumes of 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mL at directly measured intra-abdominal pressures of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm Hg. Correlation coefficients and differences were then determined.

RESULTS

Across the IAP range of 0 to 25 mm Hg using all of the tested bladder volumes, the difference between IAP and intravesicular pressures (bias) was -3.8 +/- 0.29 mm Hg (95% confidence interval) and measurements were well correlated (R2 = 0.68). Assessing all IAPs tested, a bladder volume of 0 mL demonstrated the lowest bias (-0.79 +/- 0.73 mm Hg). When considering only elevated IAPs (25 mm Hg), a bladder volume of 50 mL revealed the lowest bias (-1.5 +/- 1.36 mm Hg). A bladder volume of 50 mL in patients with elevated IAP resulted in an intravesicular pressure 1 to 3 mm Hg higher than IAP (95% confidence interval).

CONCLUSION

Intravesicular pressure closely approximates IAP. Instillation of 50 mL of liquid into the bladder improves the accuracy of the intravesicular pressure in measuring elevated IAPs.

Abdominal perfusion pressure: a superior parameter in the assessment of intra-abdominal hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical utility of abdominal perfusion pressure (mean arterial pressure minus intra-abdominal pressure) as both a resuscitative endpoint and predictor of survival in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

METHODS

144 surgical patients treated for intra-abdominal hypertension between May 1997 and June 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of common physiologic variables and resuscitation endpoints were performed to determine the decision thresholds for each variable that predict patient survival.

RESULTS

Abdominal perfusion pressure was statistically superior to both mean arterial pressure and intravesicular pressure in predicting patient survival from intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that abdominal perfusion pressure was also superior to other common resuscitation endpoints, including arterial pH, base deficit, arterial lactate, and hourly urinary output.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal perfusion pressure appears to be a clinically useful resuscitation endpoint and predictor of patient survival during treatment for intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.