Overuse of splenic scoring and computed tomographic scans

Follow-up computed tomography and unexpected hemostasis in non-operative management of pediatric blunt liver and spleen injury

PURPOSE

While follow-up CT and prophylactic embolization with angiography are often conducted during non-operative management (NOM) for BLSI, particularly in a high-grade injury, the utility of early repeated CT for preventing unexpected hemorrhage remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate whether early follow-up computerized tomography (CT) within 7 days after admission would decrease unexpected hemostatic procedures on pediatric blunt liver and spleen injury (BLSI).

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter observational cohort study on pediatric patients with BLSI (2008-2019) was conducted on those who underwent NOM, in whom the timing of follow-up CT were decided by treating physicians. The incidence of unexpected hemostatic procedure (laparotomy and/or emergency angiography for ruptured pseudoaneurysm) and complications related to BLSI were compared between patients with and without early follow-up CT within 7 days. Inverse probability weighting with propensity scores adjusted patient demographics, comorbidities, mechanism and severity of injury, initial resuscitation, and institutional characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 1320 included patients, 552 underwent early follow-up CT. Approximately 25% of patients underwent angiography on the day of admission. The incidence of unexpected hemostasis was similar between patients with and without early repeat CT (8 [1.4%] vs. 6 [0.8%]; adjusted OR, 1.44 [0.62-3.34]; p = 0.40). Patients with repeat CT scans more frequently underwent multiple angiographies (OR, 2.79 [1.32-5.88]) and had more complications related to BLSI, particularly bile leak (OR, 1.73 [1.04-2.87]).

CONCLUSION

Follow-up CT scans within 7 days was not associated with reduced unexpected hemostasis in NOM for pediatric BLSI.

Follow-up strategies for patients with splenic trauma managed non-operatively: the 2022 World Society of Emergency Surgery consensus document

BACKGROUND

In 2017, the World Society of Emergency Surgery published its guidelines for the management of adult and pediatric patients with splenic trauma. Several issues regarding the follow-up of patients with splenic injuries treated with NOM remained unsolved.

METHODS

Using a modified Delphi method, we sought to explore ongoing areas of controversy in the NOM of splenic trauma and reach a consensus among a group of 48 international experts from five continents (Africa, Europe, Asia, Oceania, America) concerning optimal follow-up strategies in patients with splenic injuries treated with NOM.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on eleven clinical research questions and 28 recommendations with an agreement rate ≥ 80%. Mobilization after 24 h in low-grade splenic trauma patients (WSES Class I, AAST Grades I-II) was suggested, while in patients with high-grade splenic injuries (WSES Classes II-III, AAST Grades III-V), if no other contraindications to early mobilization exist, safe mobilization of the patient when three successive hemoglobins 8 h apart after the first are within 10% of each other was considered safe according to the panel. The panel suggests adult patients to be admitted to hospital for 1 day (for low-grade splenic injuries-WSES Class I, AAST Grades I-II) to 3 days (for high-grade splenic injuries-WSES Classes II-III, AAST Grades III-V), with those with high-grade injuries requiring admission to a monitored setting. In the absence of specific complications, the panel suggests DVT and VTE prophylaxis with LMWH to be started within 48-72 h from hospital admission. The panel suggests splenic artery embolization (SAE) as the first-line intervention in patients with hemodynamic stability and arterial blush on CT scan, irrespective of injury grade. Regarding patients with WSES Class II blunt splenic injuries (AAST Grade III) without contrast extravasation, a low threshold for SAE has been suggested in the presence of risk factors for NOM failure. The panel also suggested angiography and eventual SAE in all hemodynamically stable adult patients with WSES Class III injuries (AAST Grades IV-V), even in the absence of CT blush, especially when concomitant surgery that requires change of position is needed. Follow-up imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound/CT scan in 48-72 h post-admission of trauma in splenic injuries WSES Class II (AAST Grade III) or higher treated with NOM was considered the best strategy for timely detection of vascular complications.

CONCLUSION

This consensus document could help guide future prospective studies aiming at validating the suggested strategies through the implementation of prospective trauma databases and the subsequent production of internationally endorsed guidelines on the issue.

Delayed splenic pseudoaneurysm identification with surveillance imaging

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that non-operative management of patients with splenic injury has up to a 90% success rate. However, delayed hemorrhage secondary to splenic artery pseudoaneurysm occurs in 5-10% of patients with up to 27% of patients developing a pseudoaneurysm on delayed imaging. The goal of our study was to evaluate the safety and utility of delayed CT imaging for blunt splenic injury patients.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of all traumatic splenic injuries from 2018 to 2020 at a single level 1 trauma center was undertaken. Patients were sub-divided into 4 groups based on the extent of splenic injury: Grades I-II, Grade III, Grade IV, and Grade V. Patient injury characteristics along with hospital length of stay, imaging, procedures, and presence/absence of pseudoaneurysm were documented.

RESULTS

588 trauma patients were initially included for evaluation with 539 included for final analysis. 297 patients sustained Grades I-II, 123 Grade III, 61 Grade IV, and 58 Grade V splenic injuries. 129 patients (24%) underwent either emergent or delayed (>6 hours) splenectomy with an additional 6 patients having a splenorrhaphy on initial operation. Of the patients who were treated non-operatively, 98% of Grade III, 91% of Grade IV, and 100% of Grade V splenic injury patients underwent follow up CT imaging. The mean time from admission to follow-up abdominal CT scan was 5 ± 4.4 days. 22 pseudoaneurysms were identified including 10/84 Grade III, 7/22 Grade IV, and 2/5 Grade V; of these patients 33% Grade III and 30% Grade IV required subsequent splenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine follow up CT imaging after high grade splenic injury identifies splenic artery pseudoaneurysm in a significant proportion of patients. Standardized surveillance imaging for high grade splenic trauma promotes prospective identification of pseudoaneurysms, allowing for interventions to minimize delayed splenic injury complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4; therapeutic.

Delayed splenic rupture following trivial trauma: A case report and review of literature

Introduction and importance

Delayed Splenic Rupture (DSR) is a rare but well-known presentation of Blunt Splenic Injury (BSI), most of which occur due to motor accidents, fall from height or direct blow to the left thorax or abdomen. Here we present a case of DSR five days after a trivial trauma.

Case presentation

A 37-year-old female presented with pain in the left-hypochondrium after an accidental bump against a furniture at home. Initially, it was a grade III splenic injury but upon arrival to our hospital from her hometown it had progressed to grade IV. Since the patient was hemodynamically stable, non-operative management (NOM) was chosen with close monitoring at the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the next morning, the patient deteriorated, showing signs of hemorrhagic shock, and a successful emergency splenectomy was done.

Clinical discussion

Over the last two decades, there has been an increasing inclination of surgeons towards NOM, even for high grade injury. NOM failure has been found to be associated with advancing age, high Injury Severity Score (ISS) or splenic injury. Some factors that improve the success of NOM are admission to ICU/floor, frequent monitoring of hemoglobin/hematocrit, vital signs, abdominal examination, and limiting heavy physical activity.

Conclusion

Clinicians should not limit the possibility of occurrence of DSR to only major traumatic events. It is imperative that a detailed history of major or trivial trauma in the preceding weeks be elicited for any patients presenting with abdominal pain.

•

Delayed Splenic Rupture is a rare but well reported presentation following blunt splenic injury.

•

Delayed Splenic Rupture can even occur following trivial trauma.

•

Clinicians must consider the entire clinical scenario to decide between operative or non-operative management.

•

A detailed history of major or minor trauma must be elicited for any patients with abdominal pain.

Damage control surgery for splenic trauma: "preserve an organ - preserve a life"

The spleen is one of the most commonly injured solid organs of the abdominal cavity and an early diagnosis can reduce the associated mortality. Over the past couple of decades, management of splenic injuries has evolved to a prefered non-operative approach even in severely injured cases. However, the optimal surgical management of splenic trauma in severely injured patients remains controversial. This article aims to present an algorithm for the management of splenic trauma in severely injured patients, that includes basic principles of damage control surgery and is based on the experience obtained by the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) of Cali, Colombia. The choice between a conservative or a surgical approach depends on the hemodynamic status of the patient. In hemodynamically stable patients, a computed tomography angiogram should be performed to determine if non-operative management is feasible and if angioembolization is required. While hemodynamically unstable patients should be transferred immediately to the operating room for damage control surgery, which includes splenic packing and placement of a negative pressure dressing, followed by angiography with embolization of any ongoing arterial bleeding. It is our recommendation that both damage control principles and emerging endovascular technologies should be applied to achieve splenic salvage when possible. However, if surgical bleeding persists a splenectomy may be required as a definitive lifesaving maneuver.

Value of repeat CT for nonoperative management of patients with blunt liver and spleen injury: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of routine repeat computed tomography (CT) for nonoperative management (NOM) of adults with blunt liver and/or spleen injury.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental and observational studies of repeat CT in adult patients with blunt abdominal injury. We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from their inception to October 2020 using Cochrane guidelines. Primary outcomes were change in clinical management (e.g., emergency surgery, embolization, blood transfusion, clinical surveillance), mortality, and complications. Secondary outcomes were hospital readmission and length of stay.

RESULTS

Search results yielded 1611 studies of which 28 studies including 2646 patients met our inclusion criteria. The majority reported on liver (n = 9) or spleen injury (n = 16) or both (n = 3). No RCTs were identified. Meta-analyses were not possible because no study performed direct comparisons of study outcomes across intervention groups. Only seven of the twenty-eight studies reported whether repeat CT was routine or prompted by clinical indication. In these 7 studies, among the 254 repeat CT performed, 188 (74%) were routine and 8 (4%) of these led to a change in clinical management. Of the 66 (26%) repeated CT prompted by clinical indication, 31 (47%) led to a change in management. We found no data allowing comparison of any other outcomes across intervention groups.

CONCLUSION

Routine repeat CT without clinical indication is not useful in the management of patients with liver and/or spleen injury. However, effect estimates were imprecise and included studies were of low methodological quality. Given the risks of unnecessary radiation and costs associated with repeat CT, future research should aim to estimate the frequency of such practices and assess practice variation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, Level II.

Routine follow-up imaging has limited advantage in the non-operative management of blunt splenic injury in adult patients

BACKGROUND

To date, limited evidence exists regarding follow-up imaging during the non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI), especially concerning ultrasound as first-line imaging modality. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and time to failure of NOM as well as to evaluate the relevance of follow-up imaging.

METHODS

All adult patients with BSI admitted to our level I trauma center, including two associated hospitals, between 01/01/2010 and 31/12/2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, comorbidities, injury pattern, trauma mechanism, Injury Severity Score, splenic injury grade and free intra-abdominal fluid were reviewed. Additional analysis of indication, frequency, modality, results and consequences of follow-up imaging was performed. Risk factors for failure of NOM were evaluated using fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients with a mean age of 43.8 ± 20.7 years (16-84 years) met inclusion criteria. Twenty patients (16.4%) underwent immediate intervention. One-hundred-and-two patients (83.6%) were treated by NOM. Failure of NOM occurred in 4 patients (3.9%). Failure was significantly associated with active bleeding (3 of 4 [75%] failures vs. 8 of 98 [8.2%] non-failures, OR 33.75, 95% CI 3.1, 363.2, p = 0.004), and liver cirrhosis (2 of 4 [50%] failures vs. 0 of 98 [0%] non-failures, OR 197, 95% CI 7.4, 5265.1, p = 0.001). Eighty patients (78.4%) in the NOM-Group received follow-up imaging by ultrasound (US, n = 51) or computed tomography (CT, n = 29). In 57 cases, routine imaging examinations were conducted (43 US and 14 CT scans) without prior clinical deterioration. Fifty-fife (96.4%) of these imaging results revealed no new significant findings. Every failure of NOM was detected following clinical deterioration in the first 48 h.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge this study includes the largest single centric patient cohort undergoing ultrasound as first-line follow-up imaging modality in the NOM setting of BSI in adult patients. The results indicate that a routine follow-up imaging, regardless of the modality, has limited therapeutic advantage. Indication for radiological follow-up should be based on clinical findings. If indicated, a CT scan should be used as preferred imaging modality.

Liver trauma: WSES 2020 guidelines

Liver injuries represent one of the most frequent life-threatening injuries in trauma patients. In determining the optimal management strategy, the anatomic injury, the hemodynamic status, and the associated injuries should be taken into consideration. Liver trauma approach may require non-operative or operative management with the intent to restore the homeostasis and the normal physiology. The management of liver trauma should be multidisciplinary including trauma surgeons, interventional radiologists, and emergency and ICU physicians. The aim of this paper is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) liver trauma management guidelines.

Follow-Up Imaging in Patients with Blunt Splenic or Hepatic Injury Managed Nonoperatively

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic and hepatic injuries has become the standard of care for hemodynamically stable patients. However, nonoperative management may lead to delayed complications and appropriate follow-up is therefore crucial. The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the role of different imaging modalities in the follow-up assessment of patients with blunt splenic or hepatic injuries using the PubMed database. Eighteen studies were found to be relevant to the topic. A total of 2725 patients were enrolled in the included studies. Both retrospective and prospective studies, but no randomized controlled trials were found. In these studies, CT, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound were discussed. CT was the most commonly used imaging modality. Taking into account all studies included, only one patient underwent intervention due to a complication diagnosed by follow-up CTscan in the absence of clinical signs and symptoms. This equates to a total of 920 CT scans performed to diagnose one clinically nonevident complication that required intervention. Based on the reviewed literature, routine imaging follow-up CT scans may not be indicated in asymptomatic patients with lower grade blunt splenic or hepatic injuries. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a promising alternative imaging modality for the follow-up of these patients.

Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients

Spleen injuries are among the most frequent trauma-related injuries. At present, they are classified according to the anatomy of the injury. The optimal treatment strategy, however, should keep into consideration the hemodynamic status, the anatomic derangement, and the associated injuries. The management of splenic trauma patients aims to restore the homeostasis and the normal physiopathology especially considering the modern tools for bleeding management. Thus, the management of splenic trauma should be ultimately multidisciplinary and based on the physiology of the patient, the anatomy of the injury, and the associated lesions. Lastly, as the management of adults and children must be different, children should always be treated in dedicated pediatric trauma centers. In fact, the vast majority of pediatric patients with blunt splenic trauma can be managed non-operatively. This paper presents the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification of splenic trauma and the management guidelines.

Management of blunt splenic injury in a UK major trauma centre and predicting the failure of non-operative management: a retrospective, cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To review the management of patients >16 years with blunt splenic injury in a single, UK, major trauma centre and identify whether the following are associated with success or failure of non-operative management with selective use of arterial embolization (NOM ± AE): age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), head injury, haemodynamic instability, massive transfusion, radiological hard signs [contrast extravasation or pseudoaneurysm on the initial computed tomography (CT) scan], grade, and presence of intraparenchymal haematoma or splenic laceration.

METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional study undertaken between April 2012 and October 2015. Paediatric patients, penetrating splenic trauma, and iatrogenic injuries were excluded. Follow-up was for at least 30 days.

RESULTS

154 patients were included. Median age was 38 years, 77.3% were male, and median ISS was 22. 14/87 (16.1%) patients re-bled following NOM in a median of 2.3 days (IQR 0.8-3.6 days). 8/28 (28.6%) patients re-bled following AE in a median of 2.0 days (IQR 1.3-3.7 days). Grade III-V injuries are a significant predictor of the failure of NOM ± AE (OR 15.6, 95% CI 3.1-78.9, p = 0.001). No grade I injuries and only 3.3% grade II injuries re-bled following NOM ± AE. Age ≥55 years, ISS, radiological hard signs, and haemodynamic instability are not significant predictors of the failure of NOM ± AE, but an intraparenchymal or subcapsular haematoma increases the likelihood of failure 11-fold (OR 10.9, 95% CI 2.2-55.1, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher grade injuries (III-V) and intraparenchymal or subcapsular haematomas are associated with a higher failure rate of NOM ± AE and should be managed more aggressively. Grade I and II injuries can be discharged after 24 h with appropriate advice.

Variation in intensive care unit utilization and mortality after blunt splenic injury

BACKGROUND

Although trauma patients are frequently cared for in the intensive care unit (ICU), admission triage criteria are unclear and may vary among providers and institutions. The benefits of close monitoring must be weighed against the economic and opportunity costs of an ICU admission.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for blunt splenic injuries from 2011-2014 at 30 level I and II Pennsylvania trauma centers. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship between ICU admission and mortality, adjusting for patient characteristics, injury characteristics, and physiology. We calculated center-level observed-to-expected ratios for ICU utilization and mortality and evaluated correlations with Spearman's rho. We compared the proportion of patients receiving critical care procedures, such as mechanical ventilation or central line placement between high and low-ICU-utilization centers.

RESULTS

Of 2587 patients with blunt splenic injuries, 63.9% (1654) were admitted to the ICU. Median injury severity score was 17 overall, 13 for non-ICU patients and 17 for ICU patients (P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, ICU admission was not significantly associated with mortality. Center-level risk-adjusted ICU admission rates ranged from 17.9%-87.3%. Risk-adjusted mortality rates ranged from 1.2%-9.6%. There was no correlation between observed-to-expected ratios for ICU utilization and mortality (Spearman's rho = -0.2595, P = 0.2103). Proportionately fewer ICU patients received critical care procedures at high-utilization centers than at low-utilization centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-adjusted ICU utilization rates for splenic trauma varied widely among trauma centers, with no clear relationship to mortality. Standardizing ICU admission criteria could improve resource utilization without increasing mortality.

Hemoperitoneum due to Splenic Laceration Caused by Colonoscopy: A Rare and Catastrophic Complication

Numerous studies suggest that in asymptomatic patients, routine follow-up CT is not indicated due to the insignificant findings found on these patients. A 53-year-old man, who denied any underlying disease before, underwent colonoscopy for routine health examination. Sudden onset of abdominal pain around left upper quarter was mentioned at our emergency department. Grade II spleen laceration was found on CT scan. Splenic injury was found few hours later on the day of colonoscopy. It might result from the extra tension between the spleen and splenic flexure which varies from different positions of patients.

[Treatment practice in patients with isolated blunt splenic injuries. A survey of Swiss traumatologists]

BACKGROUND

The non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries has gained widespread acceptance. However, there are still many controversies regarding follow-up of these patients. The purpose of this study was to survey active members of the Swiss Society of General and Trauma Surgery (SGAUC) to determine their practices regarding the NOM of isolated splenic injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey of active SGAUC members with a written questionnaire was carried out. The questionnaire was designed to elicit information about personal and facility demographics, diagnostic practices, in-hospital management, preferred follow-up imaging and return to activity.

RESULTS

Out of 165 SGAUC members 52 (31.5%) completed the survey and 62.8% of all main trauma facilities in Switzerland were covered by the sample. Of the respondents 14 (26.9%) have a protocol in place for treating patients with splenic injuries. For initial imaging in hemodynamically stable patients 82.7% of respondents preferred ultrasonography (US). In cases of suspected splenic injury 19.2% of respondents would abstain from further imaging. In cases of contrast extravasation from the spleen half of the respondents would take no specific action. For low-grade injuries 86.5% chose to admit patients for an average of 1.6 days (range 0-4 days) with a continuously monitored bed. No differences in post-discharge activity restrictions between moderate and high-grade splenic injuries were found.

CONCLUSION

The present survey showed considerable practice variation in several important aspects of the NOM of splenic injuries. Not performing further CT scans in patients with suspected splenic injuries and not intervening in cases of a contrast extravasation were the most important discrepancies to the current literature. Standardization of the NOM of splenic injuries may be of great benefit for both surgeons and patients.

Role of splenic artery embolization in management of traumatic splenic injuries: a prospective study

The objective of our study was to evaluate the role of splenic artery embolization (SAE) in the management of traumatic splenic injuries. From September 2008 to September 2010, a total of 67 patients underwent nonoperative management (NOM) for blunt splenic injuries. Twenty-two patients were excluded from the study because of associated significant other organ injuries. Twenty-five patients underwent SAE followed by NOM (group A) and 20 patients underwent standard NOM (group B). Improvement in clinical and laboratory parameters during hospital stay were compared between two groups using Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test. SAE was always technically feasible. The mean length of the total hospital stay was lower in the group A patients (5.4 vs. 6.6 day, [P = 0.050]). There was significant increase in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in group A patients after SAE, whereas in group B patients there was decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels and only slight increase in SBP (pre- and early posttreatment relative change in hemoglobin [P = 0.002], hematocrit [P = 0.001], and SBP [P = 0.017]). Secondary splenectomy rate was lower in group A (4 % [1/25] vs. 15 % [3/20] [P = 0.309]). No procedure-related complications were encountered during the hospital stay and follow-up. Minor complications of pleural effusion, fever, pain, and insignificant splenic infarct noted in 9 (36 %) patients. SAE is a technically feasible, safe, and effective method in the management of splenic injuries. Use of SAE as an adjunct to NOM of splenic injuries results improvement in hemoglobin, hematocrit levels, and SBP. SAE also reduces secondary splenectomy rate and hospital stay.

Consensus strategies for the nonoperative management of patients with blunt splenic injury: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative management is the standard of care in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injury. However, a number of issues regarding the management of these patients are still unresolved. The aim of this study was to reach consensus among experts concerning optimal treatment and follow-up strategies.

METHODS

The Delphi method was used to reach consensus among 30 expert trauma surgeons and interventional radiologists from around the world. An online survey was used in the two study rounds. Consensus was defined as an agreement of 80% or greater.

RESULTS

Response rates of the first and second rounds were 90% and 80%, respectively. Consensus was reached for 43% of the (sub)questions. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma organ injury scale for grading splenic injury is used by 93% of the experts. In hemodynamically stable patients, observation or splenic artery embolization (SAE) can be applied in the presence of a small or no hemoperitoneum combined with an intraparenchymal contrast extravasation or no contrast extravasation, regardless of the presence of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula/pseudoaneurysm. Hemodynamic instability is an indication for operative management, irrespective of computed tomographic characteristics and grade of splenic injury (≥82% of the experts). Operative management is also indicated in the presence of associated intra-abdominal injuries and/or the need for five or more packed red blood cell transfusions (22 of 27 experts, 82%). Recommended time span to start SAE in a stable patient with an intraparenchymal contrast extravasation is 60 minutes (19 of 24 experts). Patients should be admitted 1 to 3 days to a monitored setting (27 of 27 experts, 100%). Serial hemoglobin checks are performed by all experts, every 4 to 6 hours in the first 24 hours and once or twice a day after that (21 of 24 experts, 88%), in nonoperative management as well as after SAE. Routine postdischarge imaging is not indicated (21 of 24 experts, 88%).

CONCLUSION

Although treatment should always be adjusted to the specific patient, the results of this study may serve as general guidelines.

Non-operative management of renal trauma in very young children: experiences from a dedicated South African paediatric trauma unit

Blunt abdominal trauma results in renal injury in 10% of paediatric cases. Over the last twenty years, the management of paediatric renal trauma has shifted towards a primarily non-operative approach that is now well-established for children up to 18 years old. This retrospective study reviews our experiences of non-operatively managing blunt renal trauma in a very young cohort of patients up to 11 years old. Between June 2006 and June 2010, 118 children presented to the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital in Cape Town with blunt abdominal trauma. 16 patients shown to have sustained renal injury on abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning were included in this study. Medical records were reviewed for the mechanism of injury, severity of renal injury, clinical presentation, associated injuries, management method and clinical outcomes. All renal injuries were graded (I-V) according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Severity Scale. All renal trauma patients included in this study were aged between 1 and 11 years (mean of 6.5 years). 1 patient sustained grade V injuries; 2 grade IV, 6 grade III and 7 grade I injuries. The majority of injuries (9/16) were caused by motor vehicle crashes, whilst 5 children fell from height, 1 was struck by a falling tree and 1 hit by a moving train. 1 of 16 patients was haemodynamically unstable on presentation as a result of multiple splenic and hepatic lacerations. He was resuscitated and underwent immediate laparotomy. However, his renal injuries were not indications for surgical management. 15 haemodynamically stable patients were non-operatively managed for their renal injuries. Following lengths of admissions ranging from 4 to 132 days, all 16 patients were successfully discharged with no mortalities. No significant complications of renal trauma, such as new-onset hypertension, were detected during their first follow up outpatient appointments. Our findings successfully extend non-operative management of haemodynamically stable renal injuries to a very young cohort up to 11 years old. However, we still advocate immediate resuscitation and surgical intervention for any haemodynamically unstable child who had sustained any abdominal injury. We also argue for a limited role for abdominal CT imaging for diagnosing renal injury and routine follow up, instead recommending a greater emphasis on clinical observations for possible complications.

Correlation of operative and pathological injury grade with computed tomographic grade in the failed nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) is the standard for grading blunt splenic injuries, but the true accuracy, especially for grade IV or V injuries as compared to pathological findings, is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study from 2005 to 2011 was undertaken.

RESULTS

There were 214 adults admitted with blunt splenic injury and 170 (79%) were managed nonoperatively. The remaining 44 patients (21%) required surgical intervention. There was a significant difference in the Injury Severity Score (ISS) between those who did and those who did not require splenectomy: median 31 (interquartile [IQ] range 11-51) versus 22 (IQ range 9-35, p = 0.0002). Ten patients presented in shock, had a positive ultrasound, and went to surgery. The remaining 34 had CT scans prior to surgery. Twenty-five (73%) had injury grades IV or V. The CT scan correctly graded the injury in 14 (41%) and was incorrect in 20 (59%). The assigned grade by the CT scan underestimated the true injury grade by one grade in six cases (30%), by two or more grades in nine (45%), and the CT images were obscured by blood and deemed "ungradeable" in five (25%). The CT scan was more accurate for grades I and II (100%) than for grades III-V (25-43%). The reasons for inaccuracy were either inability to visualize that the laceration involved the hilar vessels or excessive perisplenic blood which obscured the injury and/or the hilum.

CONCLUSIONS

CT for splenic injury is accurate for grades I and II, but underestimates the true extent of injury for grades III-V. The reasons for the lack of correlation are the inability to determine hilar involvement and excessive perisplenic blood obscuring the injury. Patients with these image characteristics by CT scan should undergo splenectomy earlier if there are any signs of hemodynamic instability.

Traumatic pseudoaneurysms of the liver and spleen in children: is routine screening warranted?

BACKGROUND

Although blunt injury to the spleen and liver can lead to pseudoaneurysm formation, current surgical guidelines do not recommend follow-up imaging. Controversy exists regarding the clinical implications of these traumatic pseudoaneurysms as well as their management.

METHODS

Retrospective review of children treated nonoperatively for isolated blunt liver and spleen trauma between 1991 and 2008 was undertaken. Patient demographics, grade of injury, and follow-up Doppler ultrasound results were obtained.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-two children were identified. One hundred eighty-six of them had splenic injuries, and 10 (5.4%) developed pseudoaneurysms. They were associated with grade III (3/39 [8%]) and grade IV (7/41 [17%]) injuries. In 7 patients, the pseudoaneurysm thrombosed spontaneously. Angiographic embolization was required in 2 children, and one underwent emergency splenectomy for delayed hemorrhage. Of the 176 patients who had liver injuries, 3 (1.7%) developed pseudoaneurysms. All 3 were associated with grade IV injuries (3/11 [27%]). One child underwent early embolization, while 2 developed delayed hemorrhage requiring emergent treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudoaneurysm development after blunt abdominal trauma is associated with high-grade splenic and liver injuries. Routine screening of this group of patients before discharge from hospital may be warranted because of the potential risk of life-threatening hemorrhage.

Splenic injury: management in the Languedoc-Roussillon region

GOAL OF STUDY

Treatment of splenic injury is not standardized. We conducted an inventory of splenic injury treatment modalities of splenic injury in the Languedoc-Roussillon region of France.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent by e-mail to 33 surgeons practicing in 10 hospitals in that region. Surgeons were asked: how many cases were treated per year (PMSI databank for the last three years), local resources (resuscitation bay or intensive care unit, availability of CT and interventional radiology), indications (surgery, embolization, nonoperative management [NOM]), prognostic criteria, NOM modalities (duration of bed rest, hospital stay, restriction of physical activity, thromboembolic prophylaxis, and imaging schedule).

RESULTS

Thirty-one surgeons replied. An average of 185 patients were treated per year. There was consensus concerning the indication for urgent splenectomy, NOM was practiced in the stable patient (even with diffuse hemoperitoneum) and splenic artery embolization was performed for active bleeding (blush on CT) (for the six centers who have interventional radiology at their disposal). Disparities existed between centers concerning the modalities of NOM excepting imaging monitoring, initial surveillance in resuscitation bay or intensive care and in the therapeutic indications when bleeding persisted.

CONCLUSION

Based on the consensus observed in this study and an analysis of the literature, a uniform treatment policy can be proposed.

Doppler ultrasound for the assessment of conservatively treated blunt splenic injuries: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The type and need for follow-up of non-operatively managed blunt splenic injuries remain controversial. The use of Doppler ultrasound to identify post-traumatic splenic pseudoaneurysms, considered to be the main cause of "delayed" splenic rupture, has not been well described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 5-year prospective study was performed from 2004 to 2008. All patients with blunt splenic injury diagnosed with computerized tomography, who were treated non-operatively, were included in the study. Doppler ultrasound examination was performed 24-48 h post-injury. Consecutive Doppler ultrasound examinations were done on 7, 14 and 21 days post-injury for patients diagnosed with a splenic pseudoaneurysm. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Ambulatory follow-up continued for 4 weeks after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were enrolled in the study. Grading of splenic injury demonstrated 19 (50%) patients with Grade I, 16 (42%) with Grade II and 3 (8%) with Grade III injuries. Two patients (5%) had pseudoaneurysms. All pseudoaneurysms underwent complete resolution within 2 weeks after diagnosis. No patients received blood products, or had angio-embolization or surgery during the study period. All patients were found to be asymptomatic and stable at the 4-week follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Doppler ultrasound can be an effective and a safe noninvasive modality for evaluation and follow-up of patients with blunt splenic injury. The utility and cost-effectiveness of routine surveillance requires further study.

No further incidence of sepsis after splenectomy for severe trauma: a multi-institutional experience of The trauma registry of the DGU with 1,630 patients

Objective

Non-operative management of blunt splenic injury in adults has been applied increasingly at the end of the last century. Therefore, the lifelong risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection has been the major impetus for preservation of the spleen. However, the prevalence of posttraumatic infection after splenectomy in contrast to a conservative management is still unknown. Objective was to determine if splenectomy is an independent risk factor for the development of posttraumatic sepsis and multi-organ failure.

Methods

13,433 patients from 113 hospitals were prospective collected from 1993 to 2005. Patients with an injury severity score > 16, no isolated head injury, primary admission to a trauma center and splenic injury were included. Data were allocated according to the operative management into 2 groups (splenectomy (I) and conservative managed patients (II)).

Results

From 1,630 patients with splenic injury 758 patients undergoing splenectomy compared with 872 non-splenectomized patients. 96 (18.3%) of the patients with splenectomy and 102 (18.5%) without splenectomy had apparent infection after operation. Additionally, there was no difference in mortality (24.8% versus 22.2%) in both groups. After massive transfusion of red blood cells (> 10) non-splenectomy patients showed a significant increase of multi-organ failure (46% vs. 40%) and sepsis (38% vs. 25%).

Conclusions

Non-operative management leads to lower systemic infection rates and mortality in adult patients with moderate blunt splenic injury (grade 1-3) and should therefore be advocated. Patients with grade 4 and 5 injury, patients with massive transfusion of red blood cells and unstable patients should be managed operatively.

Too much of a good thing is wonderful? A conceptual analysis of excessive examinations and diagnostic futility in diagnostic radiology

It has been argued extensively that diagnostic services are a general good, but that it is offered in excess. So what is the problem? Is not "too much of a good thing wonderful", to paraphrase Mae West? This article explores such a possibility in the field of radiological services where it is argued that more than 40% of the examinations are excessive. The question of whether radiological examinations are excessive cries for a definition of diagnostic futility. However, no such definition is found in the literature. As a response, this article addresses the issue of diagnostic futility in five steps. First, it investigates whether the concept of therapeutic futility can be adapted to diagnostics. A closer analysis of the concept of therapeutic futility reveals that this will not do the trick. Second, the article scrutinizes whether there are sources for clarifying diagnostic futility in the extensive debate on excessive radiological examination. Investigating the debate's terms and definitions reveals a disparate terminology and no clear concepts. On the contrary, the study uncovers that quite different and incompatible issues are at stake. Third, the article examines a procedural approach, which is widely used for settling controversies over utility by focusing on the role of the professionals. On scrutiny however, a procedural approach will not solve the problem in diagnostics. Fourth, a value analysis reveals how we have to decide on the negative value of excessive examinations before we can measure excess. The final and constructive part presents a definition of diagnostic futility drawing upon the lessons from the previous analytical steps. Altogether, too much radiological examination is not a good thing. This is simply because radiological examinations are not unanimously good. Excessive radiological examinations can be defined, but not by one simple general and value-neutral definition. We have to settle with contextually framed value-related definitions. Such definitions will state how bad "too much of a good thing" is and make it possible to assess how much of the bad thing there is. Hence we have to know how bad it is before we can tell how much of it there is in the world.

Management of pediatric blunt splenic injuries in Canada--practices and opinions

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to compare the self-reported practice patterns of Canadian general surgeons (GSs) and pediatric general surgeons (PGSs) in treating blunt splenic injuries (BSIs) in children.

METHODS

Forty-five PGSs and 690 GSs were surveyed (internet and hard copy). chi(2) was used to compare groups; logistic regression was performed to determine independent factors influencing management variables.

RESULTS

Thirty-three PGSs and 191 GSs completed the survey, for a response rate of 30%. Pediatric general surgeons are more likely than GSs to follow American Pediatric Surgical Association guidelines (52% vs 11%; P < .0001). In diagnosing BSIs, PGSs and GSs are equally likely to use computed tomography (CT) over ultrasound for initial imaging. Pediatric general surgeons are less likely to consider CT injury grade in deciding on nonoperative management (NOM) (odds ratio [OR], 0.2; confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.5; P = .002) and are more likely to continue NOM for patients with contrast blush on CT (OR, 6.5; CI, 2.5-17; P = .0002). Pediatric general surgeons report more selective intensive care unit use, hospital stay, follow-up imaging, and activity restrictions. No differences were found in the management of splenic artery pseudoaneurysms.

CONCLUSION

Differences exist between PGSs and GSs in the management of pediatric BSIs, resulting in higher operative rates, use of resources, and radiation exposure. Further education of GSs in NOM and establishment of management guidelines are indicated.

Blunt assault is associated with failure of nonoperative management of the spleen independent of organ injury grade and despite lower overall injury severity

OBJECTIVE

Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injuries has become standard of care for its high success rate. We observe that many blunt assault (BA) patients fail NOM despite lower overall injury severity. We performed this study to determine whether BA is independently associated with failed initial NOM (FiNOM) of splenic injuries.

METHODS

Using the Trauma Registry at our level I center, we reviewed data of all patients with blunt splenic injuries, who did not undergo immediate operative management of the spleen, admitted from January 1, 1992 to December 31, 2007. Initial NOM was defined as any patient who did not undergo immediate (< or =12 hours after admission) operative intervention for the spleen or did not undergo operation for the spleen at any time during the admission. FiNOM was defined as any patient who underwent operative management of the spleen greater than 12 hours after admission. Logistic regression was performed to determine whether BA was independently associated with FiNOM.

RESULTS

FiNOM occurred in 57 of the 419 (13.6%) patients initially managed nonoperatively. FiNOM decreased significantly in non-BA patients from 15.8% (1992-1999) to 6.2% (2005-2007) (p = 0.05) over time. This was not true for BA patients (33.3% vs. 30%) (p = 0.78). FiNOM for BA patients was 36.1% (13 of 36) versus 11.5% (44 of 383) for all other mechanisms combined. FiNOM was increased across all Organ Injury Scale scores for the spleen in BA patients. BA was independently associated with FiNOM.

CONCLUSIONS

BA is associated with FiNOM independent of severity of splenic injury. Despite an increasingly successful policy of NOM in all blunt splenic injuries, this does not apply for BA. BA should be an important factor considered when initial NOM is contemplated for blunt splenic injury because of the high failure rates compared with all other mechanisms.

Computed Tomography Grading Systems Poorly Predict the Need for Intervention after Spleen and Liver Injuries

Computed tomography (CT) grading systems are often used clinically to forecast the need for interventions after abdominal trauma with solid organ injuries. We compared spleen and liver CT grading methods to determine their utility in predicting the need for operative intervention or angiographic embolization. Abdominal CT scans of 300 patients with spleen injuries, liver injuries, or both were evaluated by five trauma faculty members blinded to clinical outcomes. Studies were graded by American Association for the Surgery of Trauma criteria, a novel splenic injury CT grading system, and a novel liver injury grading system. The sensitivity and specificity of each methodology in predicting the need for intervention were calculated. The kappa statistic was used to determine interrater variability. Twenty-one per cent (39/189) of patients with splenic injuries visible on CT scans required interventions, whereas 14 per cent (21/154) of patients with liver injuries visible on CT required interventions. The overall sensitivity of all grading systems in predicting the need for surgery or angioembolization of the spleen or liver was poor; the specificity seemed to be fairly good. When evaluators were compared, the strength of agreement for the various scoring systems was only moderate. Anatomic CT grading systems are ineffective screening tools for excluding the need for operation or embolization after splenic or hepatic trauma. Although insensitive, CT is a good predictor (highly specific) of the need for intervention if certain definitive abnormalities are identified. Considerable inconsistency exists in interpretation of abdominal CT scans after trauma, even among experienced clinicians.

Angiography and embolisation in blunt splenic injury: a review

The surgical care of patients has evolved over the last 50 years. Operative intervention in the face of blunt spleen injury has been supplanted by non-operative techniques. Two of the newest techniques, angiography and embolisation, are reviewed in this article with references to patient selection, technique used and outcomes. Furthermore, current weaknesses in the data available are discussed in order to provide surgeons with a complete overview of the techniques.

Nonoperative management of spleen and liver injuries

The spleen and liver are the 2 most commonly injured abdominal organs following trauma. Trends in management have changed over the years, and the majority of these injuries are now managed nonoperatively. Splenic injuries can be managed via simple observation or with angiography and embolization. Recent data suggest that there are few true contraindications in the setting of hemodynamic stability. Success rate of nonoperative management may be as high as 95%. Liver injuries can be approached similarly. In the setting of a hemodynamically stable patient, observation with or without angiography and embolization may similarly be used. As many as 80% of patients with liver injury can be successfully managed without laparotomy. This review will discuss current concepts in nonoperative management of liver and spleen, including diagnosis, patient selection, nonoperative management strategies, benefits, risks, and complications.

Selective nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma

The management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma has evolved over the past two decades with increasing reliance on a non-operative approach. An in-depth understanding of the clinical and radiographic parameters used to determine those who may be eligible for this form of treatment is an essential component of modern trauma care. This case-based review highlights critical aspects of non-operative management and provides a framework for the role of the emergency medicine provider.

Nonoperative management of traumatic splenic injuries: is there a role for proximal splenic artery embolization?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to evaluate our experience with transcatheter proximal (i.e., main) splenic artery embolization (TPSAE) in the nonsurgical management of patients with grade III-V splenic injuries, according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) guidelines, and patients with splenic injuries associated with CT evidence of active contrast extravasation or blush (or cases meeting both criteria).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of patients with traumatic splenic injuries admitted during a 52-month period were retrospectively reviewed for patient age and sex, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), RBC transfusion requirements, AAST splenic injury CT grade, presence of active contrast extravasation or blush on CT examination, and amount of hemoperitoneum on CT examination. Demographics, CT findings, transfusion requirements, and outcome were compared using the Student's t test or chi-square test in patients undergoing standard nonoperative management and nonoperative management TPSAE-that is, TPSAE followed by nonoperative management.

RESULTS

Of the 79 identified patients with splenic trauma, 67 were managed nonoperatively. Thirty-seven patients (28 men, nine women; mean age, 40 years; mean ISS, 28.8) underwent nonoperative management TPSAE and 30 patients (27 men, three women; mean age, 37 years; mean ISS, 25.1) underwent nonoperative management. Age, sex, and ISS were not significantly different between the two groups. TPSAE was always technically feasible. Splenic injuries were significantly more severe in the nonoperative management TPSAE group than in the nonoperative management group with respect to the mean splenic injury AAST CT grade (3.7 vs 2, respectively; p < 0.0001), active contrast extravasation or blush (38% [14/37] vs 3% [1/30], respectively; p = 0.0005), and hemoperitoneum grade (1.6 vs 0.8, respectively; p = 0.0006). Secondary splenectomy rate was lower in the nonoperative management TPSAE group (2.7% [1/37] vs 10% [3/30]). No procedure-related complications were encountered during early and delayed clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION

TPSAE is a feasible and safe adjunct to observation in the nonoperative management of severe traumatic splenic injuries. The secondary splenectomy rate using nonoperative management TPSAE (2.7%) is among the lowest reported despite a selection of severe injuries.

Renal and extrarenal predictors of nephrectomy from the national trauma data bank

PURPOSE

The kidney is injured in 1.4% to 3.0% of all trauma cases. The management of renal injuries is controversial, as reflected in regional and institutional variations in treatment preferences. Using a national trauma database we identified independent risk factors for nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The population was selected from the National Trauma Data Bank, a voluntary data repository containing all trauma admissions to 268 participating trauma centers. Patients with renal injuries were identified by Abbreviated Injury Scale codes. Patient demographic, associated injuries and facility characteristics were recorded. Univariate and Poisson regression analysis with clustering by facility was performed.

RESULTS

Renal injury was present in 8,465 patients. Nephrectomy was performed in 4% of all blunt and 21% of all cases of penetrating renal injuries. Only 0.5% of blunt renal injury cases underwent repair compared with 15% of those of penetrating injuries. On multivariate analysis renal injury severity was the strongest predictor of nephrectomy. The relative risk of nephrectomy for grade V renal injuries was 146 (95% CI 74 to 289) and 33 (95% CI 13 to 89) in the blunt and penetrating models, respectively. The need for laparotomy and surgery on other intra-abdominal organs predicted nephrectomy in patients with blunt and penetrating injuries. Hospital trauma designation did not statistically impact nephrectomy rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of renal injury based on the AAST organ injury scale for Renal Trauma is the strongest risk factor for nephrectomy. The need for surgery on other intra-abdominal injuries increases the risk of nephrectomy to a lesser extent. In cases of blunt trauma severe renal injury usually necessitates nephrectomy.

Surgeon-Performed Bedside Organ Assessment With Sonography After Trauma (BOAST): A Pilot Study From the WTA Multicenter Group

BACKGROUND

Although nonoperative management of solid organ injuries is a well-accepted practice, a rapid method to assess the progression of the injury, the early development of organ-related complications, and the frequency with which follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans are needed has yet to be determined. The use of ultrasound in this setting may provide information that would improve the rate of organ salvage and decrease the patient's morbidity. The objectives of this study were to determine whether surgeons could successfully use a bedside organ assessment with sonography after trauma (BOAST) examination to: (1) detect a solid organ injury; and (2) assess for changes in the size of the organ injury, an increase or decrease in hemoperitoneum, and the development of organ-related complications.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter study was conducted using BOAST to evaluate patients undergoing nonoperative management of their solid organ injuries. Patients had to have: (1) a Focused Assessment for Sonography of Trauma (FAST) examination on admission; (2) a solid organ injury documented by an admission abdominal CT scan; and (3) the criteria for nonoperative management. BOAST was performed within 24 hours of admission and every 3 to 4 days to evaluate for an increase or decrease in hemoperitoneum [Ultrasound (US) heme score: from 0 = none to 3 = large], change in injury size, and organ-specific complications. BOAST results were compared with the radiologists' interpretation of the initial and follow-up CT scans, and with patient outcomes.

RESULTS

During a 22 month period, 126 patients sustained 135 solid organ injuries, 46 (34.1%) of these were seen by BOAST (Error rate = 66%). Serial US heme scores = 0 (no hemoperitoneum) were observed in 56 of 126 patients who had a combination of multi-system injury and a dropping Hgb, indicating that there was no further bleeding from the injured organ(s). Surgeons detected 13 of the 15 complications that were confirmed later by conventional imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) BOAST has limitations in identifying solid organ injuries, especially those that are lower grade; (2) the US heme score is a valuable adjunct to the clinical examination in following patients with high-grade solid organ injuries and a dropping hemoglobin; and (3) although uncommon, organ-related complications may be identified using BOAST.

A Survey of EAST Member Practices in Blunt Splenic Injury: A Description of Current Trends and Opportunities for Improvement

BACKGROUND

The literature on blunt splenic trauma provides little evidence-based direction for nonsurgical management. The appropriate role of computed tomography (CT) after initial diagnosis, activity restriction and follow-up are continuing controversies.

METHODS

Active EAST members were surveyed regarding in-hospital management and follow-up of patients with isolated and near-isolated blunt splenic injury. Analyses were performed using descriptive and correlational statistics.

RESULTS

A 38.4% response rate was obtained. 82.6% of respondents practiced at a Level I trauma centers. 97% of respondents considered hemodynamic instability as the primary indication for immediate splenectomy. 71.6% of respondents preferred ultrasound for initial imaging in hemodynamically stable patients. One-third of respondents admitted stable Grade I patients to monitored settings. 85.5% would not routinely perform predischarge abdominal CT scan in the absence of clinical deterioration, extravasation on initial CT or high-grade injury. Activity restriction varied by grade (table). The majority of respondents (78.1%) relied on clinical judgment alone for activity recommendations in lower grades of injury while a higher reliance on CT was used for Grades IV and V (49.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of evidence-based guidelines, many in-hospital and follow-up practices were reasonably consistent. However, some important contradictions were noted (such as monitoring very low risk patients and not intervening in patients with contrast blush). Activity restrictions were usually based on clinical judgment supplemented by CT at the highest grades of injury. Lack of evidence-based guidelines and high reliance on clinical judgment underscore the need for a well-designed prospective study to define optimal management and follow-up.

Assessment of Nonoperative Management of Blunt Spleen and Liver Trauma

An 8-year analysis of nonoperative management (NOM) of spleen and liver trauma was done in a level 1 trauma center. Spleen and liver trauma was diagnosed in 279 patients: 93 children (<18), 137 younger adults (18–54), and 49 older adults (≥ 55). Nineteen patients who failed resuscitations died within 0–60 minutes of arrival and were excluded from treatment analysis. Operative management (OM) was done in 39 (15%) and NOM in 221 (85%) patients with failure (NOMF) in 11 (5%). NOM and NOMF was 82 per cent and 5.6 per cent in spleen, 74 per cent and 14.3 per cent in combined spleen/liver, and 96 per cent and 1.5 per cent in liver trauma ( P value <0.001). NOM was done in 99 per cent of children, 81 per cent of younger adults, and 68 per cent of older adults with 0 per cent, 8 per cent, and 10 per cent NOMF. Higher grades of splenic trauma and CT fluid had higher OM rate. NOM success rates were 93.8 per cent in grade 3 and 90.3 per cent in higher grades of spleen trauma. There was no NOMF in higher grades of liver trauma. CT fluid grade had no impact on NOMF. Female patients had higher mean injury severity score, age, and mortality compared to cohorts. NOM should be attempted in hemodynamically stable patients. Age over 55, higher grades of injury, and large hemoperitoneum were not predictors of failure of NOM.

Sonography as the primary screening method in evaluating blunt abdominal trauma

PURPOSE

The radiological evaluation of patients with blunt abdominal trauma can be done with either ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) with strategies varying considerably among institutions. We evaluated the efficacy of our current strategy in which US is used at our hospital as the primary screening tool for patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all patients admitted to our hospital with possible blunt abdominal trauma who underwent abdominal US, abdominal CT and/or a laparotomy during the initial trauma assessment from 1998 until 2002 (n = 1149).

RESULTS

Nine-hundred sixty-one of the 1149 patients had a negative US, of which 922 were true negative, resulting in a negative predictive value of 96%. A CT of the abdomen was performed in 7%. In 1.7% there was delayed diagnosis with no significant additional morbidity. Fourteen of the 103 laparotomies (14%) were non-therapeutic; in 5 of these cases the patients underwent non-therapeutic laparotomy despite the performance of a CT. Seven were emergency operations.

CONCLUSIONS

In our practice, the use of US for the evaluation of acute blunt abdominal trauma is adequate, with a high negative predictive value, a small number of delayed diagnoses, and an acceptable rate of non-therapeutic laparotomies.

Role of Repeat Computerized Tomography in Nonoperative Management of Solid Organ Trauma

Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt spleen and liver trauma is currently well accepted. CT imaging is helpful in selecting treatment options and to evaluate resolution of solid organ trauma. This 8-year study was undertaken to assess the role of repeat CT scans in NOM by analyzing indications of surgery in NOM failures. NOM was undertaken in 221 patients with spleen/liver trauma. After initial CT scans, 82 (37%) scans were repeated in 65 patients. There was failure of NOM (NOMF) in 11 patients. Follow-up imaging was done prior to delayed surgery in 4 (36%) patients, 4.9 per cent of repeat scans. Two of these patients had hemodynamic instability and, in the other two, there were clinical signs of peritonitis. The remaining seven patients had delayed surgery due to hemodynamic instability. There is a limited role of repeat CT scans in NOM of spleen and liver trauma. Repeat CT should be done more liberally in patients with suspected intestinal and mesenteric trauma, unexplained blood loss, complex hepato-biliary trauma, and in patients with neurological or pharmacological paralysis.

Inter- and intrarater reliability in computed axial tomographic grading of splenic injury: why so many grading scales?

OBJECTIVE

After splenic trauma, critical decisions regarding operative intervention are often made with the aid of computed axial tomographic (CT) scan findings. No CT scan-based grading scale has been demonstrated to predict accurately which patients require operative or radiologic intervention for their splenic injuries. We hypothesized that use of the most common grading scale, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma scale, would be associated with low intra- and interreliability scores. We assessed the ability of experienced trauma radiologists to differentiate grade III from grade IV splenic injuries.

METHODS

The films of patients who had undergone abdominal CT scanning before splenectomy for grade III or IV injuries were serially evaluated by four trauma radiology faculty weekly for 3 weeks. We assessed intra- and interrater reliability for grading and for presence of contrast blush.

RESULTS

Intrarater reproducibility yielded a weighted kappa score of 0.15 to 0.77. Interrater reliability weighted kappa scores ranged from 0 to 0.84, with a mean value of 0.23.

CONCLUSION

CT imaging is not reliable for identifying grades III and IV splenic injury, as experienced radiologists often underestimate the magnitude of injury. Interrater reliability is poor. Factors other than the CT grade of splenic injury should determine whether patients require operative or angiographic therapy.

Is delayed laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma a valid quality improvement measure in the era of nonoperative management of abdominal injuries?

BACKGROUND

Review of hemodynamically stable patients who undergo laparotomy for trauma greater than 4 hours after admission is an American College of Surgeons quality improvement filter. We reviewed our recent experience with patients who underwent laparotomy for trauma greater than 4 hours after admission to evaluate the reasons for delay, and to determine whether they were because of failure of nonoperative management or other causes.

METHODS

The registry at our Level I trauma center was searched from January 1998 through December 2000 for patients who required a laparotomy for trauma greater than 4 hours after admission. Of 3,369 admitted blunt trauma patients, 90 (2.7%) underwent laparotomy for trauma, of which 26 (29%) were identified as delayed laparotomies greater than 4 hours after admission.

RESULTS

The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash, the mean Injury Severity Score was 18, and 65% of the patients had significant distracting injuries. Five patients had laparotomy greater than 24 hours after admission. The average time to the operating room in the remaining patients was 8.6 hours. Clinical examination (61%) findings were the most common indication for operation. Gastrointestinal (GI) tract injury was the most common injury associated with delay in laparotomy (58%).

CONCLUSION

GI tract injuries are the predominant injury leading to delayed laparotomy for blunt trauma (58%). Failed nonoperative management of solid organ injuries occurred less frequently (15%). Future efforts should concentrate on earlier identification of GI tract injury. Delayed laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma is a valid quality improvement measure.

[Second hemorrhage in patients with splenic injuries]

Although the diagnosis of spleen injuries is not a considerable clinical problem today, subsequent ruptures of this organ may occur in a smaller number of patients (2-5% of total proportion of spleen injuries) following the so-called "free interval". Such injuries are most commonly explained by present hematoma localized in the central spleen, which becomes larger in time, and eventually causes its rupture. This form of lesion may be found both in isolated blunt abdominal injuries and in associated injuries. When it is the question of delayed hemorrhage, our results as well as data obtained from foreign literature, suggest three basic rise factors of the etiology of this type of injury. These are as follows: a) spleen injuries in severe trauma or polytrauma, b) older patients (over 65 years of age), and c) in cases when more than a single blood unit had to be administered for the initial hemodynamic stabilization of a patient. Delayed hemorrhage, which is occult in polytraumatized patients since it is frequently "disguised" by severity of clinical picture and traumatic shock, may subsequently cause sudden fall of hemogram and hemodynamic parameter values, and if immediate surgery is not performed, it may lead to heavy bleeding and lethal outcome of the patient.

Blunt thoraco-abdominal injury

Recent advances in blunt thoraco-abdominal trauma management include improvements in imaging, particularly in trauma bay ultrasound. Indications for non-operative management have expanded for solid organ and aortic injury. The physiology of abdominal compartment syndrome continues to be defined, with resulting improvements in care.