Analysis of motor vehicle ejection victims admitted to a level I trauma center

New cars on the highways: Trends in injuries and outcomes following ejection

Background

Although ejections from motor vehicles are considered a marker of a significant mechanism and a predictor of severe injuries and mortality, scant recent data exist to validate these outcomes. This study investigates whether ejections increase the mortality risk following a motor vehicle crash using data that reflect the introduction of new vehicles to the streets of a large city in the United States.

Methods

The Trauma and Emergency Medicine Information System of Los Angeles County was queried for patients ≥ 16 years old admitted following a motor vehicle crash between 2002 and 2012. Ejected patients were compared to nonejected. Primary outcome was mortality. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of mortality and severe trauma.

Results

A total of 9,742 (6.8%) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 449 (4.6%) were ejected; 368 (82.0%) were passengers and 81 (18.0%) were drivers. The rate of ejection decreased linearly (6.1% in 2002 to 3.4% in 2012). Compared to nonejected patients, ejected patients were more likely to require intensive care unit admission (43.7% vs 22.1%, P < .01), have critical injuries (Injury Severity Score > 25) (24.2% vs 7.3%, P <.01), require emergent surgery (16.3% vs 8.0%, P <.01), and expire in the emergency department (3.6% vs 1.2%, P <.01). Overall mortality was 3.6%: 9.6% for ejected and 3.3% for nonejected patients (P <.01). In a logistic regression model, ejection and extrication both predicted mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.83, P <.01 and 1.87, P <.01, respectively). Ejection also predicted critical injuries (Injury Severity Score > 25) with adjusted odds ratio of 2.48 (P <.01).

Conclusion

Ejections following motor vehicle crash have decreased throughout the years; however, they remain a marker of critical injuries and predictive of mortality.

•

The rate of ejection during a motor vehicle crash has decreased since 2002.

•

Ejected patients had a significantly higher mortality compared to nonejected.

•

Ejection was a predictor of both critical injuries and mortality.

Do pre-hospital trauma alert criteria predict the severity of injury and a need for an emergent surgical intervention?

OBJECTIVE

Efficient triage may have a major influence on mortality and morbidity as well as financial consequences. A continuous effort to improve this decision making process and update the trauma alert criteria is being made. However, criteria for determining the evacuation priority are not well developed. We performed a prospective study to evaluate which pre-hospital parameters identify major trauma victims with an emphasis on a need for emergent surgical procedures.

METHODS

A prospective cohort included 601 patients admitted to a level one trauma centre over a three months period. The pre-hospital trauma alert criteria were recorded and set as independent variables. All major surgical procedures were graded in real time as: emergent, urgent, or not urgent. The ISS was calculated after completion of all the diagnostic workup. Patients were classified as major trauma victims if their calculated ISS was 16 or greater, and those needed an urgent intervention or intensive care. The relative risks (RR) for major trauma and a need for an emergent operation were calculated.

RESULTS

243 (40%) patients were classified as having a major trauma. 39 (6.5%) patients required an emergent operative intervention: 24 for an active bleeding, 5 for a pericardial tamponade and 10 for an imminent cerebral herniation. Paramedic judgement and a penetrating injury to the trunk were the most common causes for over triage. However, a penetrating injury to the trunk had been the only clue that the victim needed an emergent operation in five cases. 128 patients had a pre-hospital Glasgow coma score (GCS) ≤ 12. Altered mental status was the most common and a significant predictor of both major trauma (RR of 3.00 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.98-4.53) and a need for an emergent operation (RR, 95% CI: 4.43, 2.28-8.58). Also, a systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg was highly associated with an emergent operation (RR, 95% CI: 11.69, 5.85-23.36).

CONCLUSION

For determining the evacuation priority, we suggest a triage system based on three major criteria: mental status, hypotension and a penetrating injury to the trunk. Overall, the set of trauma alert criteria system can be further simplified and enable better utilisation of resources.

Motor vehicle trauma: analysis of injury profiles by road-user category

BACKGROUND

Vehicle accidents in Greece are among the leading causes of death and the primary one in young people. The mechanism of injury influences the patterns of injury in victims of vehicle accidents.

OBJECTIVE

Identification and analysis of injury profiles of motor-vehicle trauma patients in a Greek level I trauma centre, by road-user category.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The trauma registry data of Herakleion University Hospital of adult trauma patients admitted to the hospital after a vehicle accident between 1997 and 2000 were retrospectively examined. Patients were grouped based on the mechanism of injury into three road-user categories: car occupants, motorcyclists, and pedestrians.

RESULTS

Of 730 consecutive patients, 444 were motorcyclists (60.8%), 209 were car occupants (28.7%), and 77 were pedestrians (10.5%). Young men constituted the majority of injured motorcyclists whereas older patients (p = 0.0001) and women (p = 0.0001) represented a substantial proportion of the injured pedestrians. With regard to the spectrum of injuries in the groups, craniocerebral injuries were significantly more frequent in motorcyclists and pedestrians (p = 0.0001); abdominal (p = 0.009) and spinal cord trauma (p = 0.007) in car occupants; and pelvic injuries (p = 0.0001) in pedestrians. Although the car occupants had the highest Injury Severity Score (ISS) (p = 0.04), the pedestrians had the poorest outcome with substantially higher mortality (p = 0.007) than the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results reveal a clear association between different road-user categories and age and sex incidence patterns, as well as outcomes and injury profiles. Recognition of these features would be useful in designing effective prevention strategies and in comprehensive prehospital and inhospital treatment of motor-vehicle trauma patients.