TDP2 is a regulator of estrogen-responsive oncogene expression

With its ligand estrogen, the estrogen receptor (ER) initiates a global transcriptional program, promoting cell growth. This process involves topoisomerase 2 (TOP2), a key protein in resolving topological issues during transcription by cleaving a DNA duplex, passing another duplex through the break, and repairing the break. Recent studies revealed the involvement of various DNA repair proteins in the repair of TOP2-induced breaks, suggesting potential alternative repair pathways in cases where TOP2 is halted after cleavage. However, the contribution of these proteins in ER-induced transcriptional regulation remains unclear. We investigated the role of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 2 (TDP2), an enzyme for the removal of halted TOP2 from the DNA ends, in the estrogen-induced transcriptome using both targeted and global transcription analyses. MYC activation by estrogen, a TOP2-dependent and transient event, became prolonged in the absence of TDP2 in both TDP2-deficient cells and mice. Bulk and single-cell RNA-seq analyses defined MYC and CCND1 as oncogenes whose estrogen response is tightly regulated by TDP2. These results suggest that TDP2 may inherently participate in the repair of estrogen-induced breaks at specific genomic loci, exerting precise control over oncogenic gene expression.

Socioeconomic disparities in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Demographic and socioeconomic disparities affect cancer specific outcomes in numerous malignancies, but the impact of these for patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) is not well understood. The primary objective was to investigate the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors on overall survival (OS) for patients with SBNETs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Database to assess patients diagnosed with SBNET between 2004 and 2015. Patients were stratified by demographics, socioeconomic factors, insurance status, and place of living.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 78.5%. The 5-year survival was worse in patients with lower income (p < 0.0001), lower education (p < 0.0001), not in proximity to a metro area (p = 0.0004), and treatment at a community cancer center (p < 0.0001). Adjusting for age and sex, factors associated with worse OS were lower income (<$38 000) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.28), lower education (>20% no HSD) (HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), no insurance (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.33-2.06), and not living in proximity to a metro area (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10-1.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient demographics and socioeconomic factors play an important role in survival of patients with SBNETs, specifically proximity to a metro area, median income, education level, and type of treatment center. Strategies to improve access to care must be considered in this at-risk population.

Neoadjuvant rectal score is prognostic for survival: A population-based propensity-matched analysis

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score may serve as a surrogate short-term endpoint for overall survival (OS) in clinical trials. This study aims to test the NAR score using a large, national cancer registry.

METHODS

National Cancer Database patients with clinical stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery were selected and divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-NAR subgroups. OS outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 12 452 patients were selected, of which 5071 (40.7%) were in clinical stage II and 7381 (59.3%) were in clinical stage III; 15.2% had pathologic complete response. The mean NAR score was 10.01 ± 10.61. Six thousand nine hundred and forty-one (55.7%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and were propensity-matched across NAR subgroups (966 in each group). A significant difference in 5-year OS between low-, intermediate-, and high-NAR groups was observed (85% vs. 76% vs. 68%; p < 0.001). Five thousand five hundred and eleven (44.3%) received AC and 1045 triplets were propensity-matched per NAR groups. A significant difference was again observed for 5-year OS (93% vs. 88% vs. 75%; p < 0.001). Logistic regression confirmed NAR strata as a significant predictor of 5-year OS.

CONCLUSION

NAR score, as a neoadjuvant response measure, is a strong predictor of 5-year OS, regardless of AC receipt in a heterogenous population of locally advanced RAC patients.

The fragility of a structurally diverse duplication block triggers recurrent genomic amplification

The human genome contains hundreds of large, structurally diverse blocks that are insufficiently represented in the reference genome and are thus not amenable to genomic analyses. Structural diversity in the human population suggests that these blocks are unstable in the germline; however, whether or not these blocks are also unstable in the cancer genome remains elusive. Here we report that the 500 kb block called KRTAP_region_1 (KRTAP-1) on 17q12-21 recurrently demarcates the amplicon of the ERBB2 (HER2) oncogene in breast tumors. KRTAP-1 carries numerous tandemly-duplicated segments that exhibit diversity within the human population. We evaluated the fragility of the block by cytogenetically measuring the distances between the flanking regions and found that spontaneous distance outliers (i.e DNA breaks) appear more frequently at KRTAP-1 than at the representative common fragile site (CFS) FRA16D. Unlike CFSs, KRTAP-1 is not sensitive to aphidicolin. The exonuclease activity of DNA repair protein Mre11 protects KRTAP-1 from breaks, whereas CtIP does not. Breaks at KRTAP-1 lead to the palindromic duplication of the ERBB2 locus and trigger Breakage-Fusion-Bridge cycles. Our results indicate that an insufficiently investigated area of the human genome is fragile and could play a crucial role in cancer genome evolution.

Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors with Liver-only Metastases: Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND

Management of metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors (MNET) remains controversial. The benefits of resecting the primary tumor are not clear and advocated only for select patients. This study aimed to determine whether resection of the primary MNET in patients with untreated liver-only metastases has an impact on survival.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed data of the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 for patients with liver-only metastatic MNETs and compared those who received resection of their primary MNET with those who did not. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) after adjustment for patient, demographic, and tumor-related factors.

RESULTS

The study identified 1952 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 18-90 years). The median primary tumor size was 2.4 cm (range, 0.1-20 cm). Of these patients, 1295 (66%) underwent resection of the primary tumor and 667 (34%) did not. The patients who underwent resection were younger (median age, 63 vs 65 years; p < 0.001) and had smaller primary tumors (median, 2.3 vs 3.0 cm; p < 0.001). The patients with clinical T1 or T2 tumors were significantly less likely to undergo resection than those with stage T3 or T4 tumors (58.5% vs 89.7%; p < 0.001). The median follow-up period was 43 months (range, 1-83 months). In the entire cohort, 483 deaths occurred, with a 5-year OS of 61%. The 5-year OS rate was 49% for the patients who underwent resection and 66% for those who did not (p < 0.001). When the patients were grouped according to T stage, no OS difference between resection and no resection for stages T1 (p = 0.07) and T2 (p = 0.40) was identified. However, the 5-year OS rate was significantly better for the resected patient cohort with T3 (67.5% vs 37.2%; p < 0.001) or T4 (59.8% vs 21.5%; p < 0.001) tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with treatment-naïve liver-only metastatic MNET had improved OS when the primary tumor was resected, particularly those with clinical stage T3 or T4 tumors. These patients may benefit from surgical resection of their primary tumor.

Extent of lymph node resection and effect on pancreatic cancer overall survival

682

Background: Lymph node (LN) metastases affect overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer (PC). However, a LN sampling threshold does not exist. We examined the impact of nodal sampling on overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients with Stage I-III PC ≥55 years old who underwent curative resection from 2004-2016 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). After adjusting for age, gender, grade, stage, and Charlson-Deyo score, multiple binomial logistic regression analyses assessed the impact of the LN ratio (LNR) on OS. LNR was defined as the number of positive LN over the number of LN examined. Regression analyses, a Cox-Regression, and a Kaplan-Meier survival curve assessed how many LN should be sampled. Results: A total of 13,673 patients, median age 69 years (55-90), were included. Most were Caucasian (86.6%) males with Charlson-Deyo scores ≤ 1 (90.3%) and moderately to poorly differentiated PC (90.1%). Median number of LN examined was 15 (1-75) with a median of 1 positive LN (0-35). As expected, increased number of positive LNs was associated with reduced OS, p < 0.001. After data normalization, an increasing LNR was associated with a 12-fold likelihood of death [OR: 11.9, p < 0.001 (CI 6.0, 23.7)]. Subsequent regression models established evaluation of ≥ 16 LNs as the greatest predictor of OS. A regression model evaluating < or ≥ 16 lymph nodes was performed to ascertain the effects of age, gender, ethnicity, grade, stage, and LN examined on OS. The logistic regression model correctly classified 74.5% of cases with a specificity of 99.6% (p < 0.001). Examination of < 16 LN, Caucasian race, grade, stage, and higher Charlson-Deyo scores were significantly associated with decreased OS. If ≥ 16 LNs were examined, patients had a 1.5-fold likelihood of better OS, p < 0.001 (CI 1.4, 1.6). An adjusted Cox Regression showed increased HR of 1.2, p < 0.001 (CI 1.1, 1.2) and an unadjusted Kaplan Meier survival curve predicted ≥ 16 LN examined are associated with an increase in OS of 2.8 months [log-rank: 32.0, p < 0.001]. Conclusions: Patients undergoing curative intent resection for PC should have adequate nodal sampling. Stratification of patients by LNR may provide useful information of OS. Examination of ≥ 16 LNs impacts OS in patients with Stage I-III PC.

Baseline features predicting receipt of chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis of 12,370 patients

316

Background: We investigated predictors for chemotherapy (CTX) and prognostic variables in a large metastatic esophageal cancer (mEC) patient data set. Methods: We interrogated the National Cancer Database between 2004-2015 and included patients (pts) with M1 disease who had known CTX status (received or did not receive CTX). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed, and a logistic regression model was used to estimate the effect of CTX with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: We included 12,370 mEC patients with available CTX status for multivariable analyses. Predictors for CTX treatment included year of diagnosis 2010-2014 (odds ratio (OR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.43), median income > $46,000 (OR 1.49, 1.27-1.75), and node-positivity (OR 1.35, 1.20-1.52; all p < 0.05), while female gender (OR 0.86, 0.76-0.98), black race (OR 0.76, 0.67-0.93), uninsured (OR 0.41, 0.33-0.52), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥2 (OR 0.61, 0.50-0.74) predicted for lower odds of receiving CTX (all p < 0.05). Median OS for pts receiving CTX was 9.53 mos (9.33-9.72) vs. 2.43 mos (2.27-2.60) with no CTX (p < 0.001). Modeling the effect of CTX to OS using a time-dependent coefficient showed that CTX was associated with improved OS up to 10 months, after which there is no significant effect on OS. Independent predictors of OS included treatment at an academic center (hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 0.87-0.94), CCI ≥2 (HR 1.16, 1.07-1.26), and uninsured status (HR 1.20, 1.09-1.31). Conclusions: We identified several predictors for receipt of CTX and OS in pts with mEC. The benefit of CTX on OS is time-dependent and favors early initiation. Focused outreach in lower income and underinsured patients is critical as receipt of CTX is associated with improved OS.

Impact of palliative care in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer declining chemotherapy

315

Background: Palliative care has been associated with improved overall survival (OS), but limited data exist in metastatic esophageal cancer (mEC). We investigated the impact of palliative care in patients with mEC who declined chemotherapy (CTX). Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients between 2004-2015. Patients with M1 disease who declined CTX and had known palliative care status (surgery, radiotherapy [RT], pain management, or any combination of) were included. Cases with unknown CTX, RT, or nonprimary surgery status were excluded. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS were calculated. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were performed. Results: Among 140,234 EC cases, we identified 1,493 patients who declined CTX and had complete data. Median age was 70 years, most (66.3%) had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 0, and 37.1% were treated at an academic center. Most (72.7%) did not receive palliative care. Median OS was 2.53 months (mos), with no statistically significant difference in median OS between those receiving palliative care (2.83 mos, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.53-3.12) vs. no palliative care (2.37 mos, 2.2-2.56; p = 0.288). On univariable analysis, treatment at an academic center (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 0.80-1.00) and CCI ≥2 (HR 1.20, 1.00-1.42) were predictive of OS (p < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, male sex (HR 1.23, 1.08-1.40), South geographic region (HR 1.23, 1.04-1.46), CCI of 1 (HR 1.17, 1.03-1.32), higher grade (HR 1.21, 1.07-1.38), and higher T stage (HR 1.39, 1.12-1.73) were associated with poor OS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Palliative care conferred a numerically higher, but not statistically significant difference in OS among patients with mEC declining CTX. Quality of life metrics, inpatient status, and subgroup analyses are important for examining the role of palliative care in mEC and future studies are warranted.

Socioeconomic disparities and outcomes in midgut neuroendocrine tumors

613

Background: Demographic and socioeconomic disparities have been shown to effect cancer specific outcomes in numerous malignancies but the effect in midgut neuroendocrine tumors (mNETs) is unknown. We sought to investigate whether these factors are associated with survival in mNETs. Methods: The NCDB was queried to identify patients with mNETs between 2004 and 2015. Only patients treated at a single hospital with complete data were included. Overall Survival (OS) was compared based on demographic data, socioeconomic factors, insurance status and place of living. Results: A total of 14,083 patients were identified with a mean age of 72 years (range 18-90). The majority of patients were Caucasian (83.9%) and male (50.9%). Most patients had private insurance (50.5%) or medicare (41.3%). Patients typically lived in larger metropolitan areas (51.5%) and 60.7% lived in zip codes with median household incomes > $48,000. Only 14.7% lived in zip codes where > 20% did not graduate high school (no HSD). The majority were treated at community comprehensive cancer centers (43.8%) or academic/research centers (35.2%). Overall, 3358 (24.5%) presented with metastasis at diagnosis. The 5-year OS for the entire cohort was 78.5%. The 5-year survival was worse in patients with lower median income (73.8% [ < $38,000] vs 81.5% [ > $63,000],p < 0.0001), lower education (74.9% [ > 20% no HSD] vs 80.7% [ < 7% no HSD], p < 0.0001), those not living in proximity to a metro area (73.8% [not metro adjacent] vs 78.7% [metro/adjacent], p = 0.0004) and those treated at a community cancer center (73.6% [community] vs. 80.1% [academic], p < 0.0001). Factors predictive of worse OS were lower income ( < $38,000) (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.28), lower education ( > 20% no HSD) (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.26), no insurance (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.33-2.06) and not living in proximity to a metro area (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.47). Conclusions: Socioeconomic factors shown to have worse OS in patients with mNETs were lower median income, lower education, treatment at a community cancer center and not living in proximity to a metro area. Patient demographic and socioeconomic factors play an important role in OS for patients with mNETs and access to care must be considered in this subpopulation of cancer patients.

Impact of Resident and Fellow Participation on Surgical Outcomes in Breast Conserving Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Few studies examine the impact of surgical trainee involvement on tumor-free margins in breast conserving surgery (BCS). Our objective was to investigate the impact of resident and fellow involvement on positive margins rates following BCS for invasive breast cancer (BC).

DESIGN

We identified female patients who had BCS for BC between January 2005 to December 2015.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Around 1089 patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database.

RESULTS

Of 1089 patients, mean age was 63 (range 43-99) years. Around 768 patients (70.1%) required preoperative localization, and 328 patients (29.9%) had a palpable cancer. Nonpalpable cancers had a smaller volume of specimen tissue excised (p = 0.0005) compared to palpable cancers, and no significant difference was observed in the positive margin rate between the nonpalpable group compared to the palpable group (24.7% nonpalpable vs. 25.3% palpable, p = 0.88). Nonpalpable cancer positive margin rates were 23.9% (n = 102/427) for cases performed by an attending surgeon, 25.0% (n = 15/60) with a junior resident (PGY 2-3), 28.6% (n = 8/28) with a senior resident (PGY 4-5), and 25.7% (n = 65/253) with a fellow, which were not statistically significant (p = 0.89). Palpable cancer positive margin rates were 27.6% (n = 47/170) for cases performed by an attending, 13.9% (n = 5/36) with an intern (PGY-1), 40.9% (n = 9/22) with a junior resident, 0% (n = 0/8) with a senior resident, and 23.9% (n = 22/92) with a fellow, which were also not significantly different (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Resident and fellow participation in BCS for BC does not appear to impact the rate of positive margins.

New cars on the highways: Trends in injuries and outcomes following ejection

Background

Although ejections from motor vehicles are considered a marker of a significant mechanism and a predictor of severe injuries and mortality, scant recent data exist to validate these outcomes. This study investigates whether ejections increase the mortality risk following a motor vehicle crash using data that reflect the introduction of new vehicles to the streets of a large city in the United States.

Methods

The Trauma and Emergency Medicine Information System of Los Angeles County was queried for patients ≥ 16 years old admitted following a motor vehicle crash between 2002 and 2012. Ejected patients were compared to nonejected. Primary outcome was mortality. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of mortality and severe trauma.

Results

A total of 9,742 (6.8%) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 449 (4.6%) were ejected; 368 (82.0%) were passengers and 81 (18.0%) were drivers. The rate of ejection decreased linearly (6.1% in 2002 to 3.4% in 2012). Compared to nonejected patients, ejected patients were more likely to require intensive care unit admission (43.7% vs 22.1%, P < .01), have critical injuries (Injury Severity Score > 25) (24.2% vs 7.3%, P <.01), require emergent surgery (16.3% vs 8.0%, P <.01), and expire in the emergency department (3.6% vs 1.2%, P <.01). Overall mortality was 3.6%: 9.6% for ejected and 3.3% for nonejected patients (P <.01). In a logistic regression model, ejection and extrication both predicted mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.83, P <.01 and 1.87, P <.01, respectively). Ejection also predicted critical injuries (Injury Severity Score > 25) with adjusted odds ratio of 2.48 (P <.01).

Conclusion

Ejections following motor vehicle crash have decreased throughout the years; however, they remain a marker of critical injuries and predictive of mortality.

•

The rate of ejection during a motor vehicle crash has decreased since 2002.

•

Ejected patients had a significantly higher mortality compared to nonejected.

•

Ejection was a predictor of both critical injuries and mortality.

Prognostic factors influencing survival in small bowel neuroendocrine tumor with liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Resection of liver metastasis in small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNET) may improve survival, however, factors influencing prognosis are unclear. We evaluated how the extent of resection influences outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with SBNET with liver metastasis from 1990 to 2013 who underwent resection of the primary tumor were identified. Outcomes among patients undergoing complete resection (CR), partial resection (PR), or no resection (NR) of liver metastases with resection of the primary tumor only were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven patients met the criteria. The median number of liver lesions was seven and median lesions resected was one. Fifty (45%) patients had NR, 41 (36.9%) underwent CR, and 20 (18.1%) underwent PR. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 79.4% for NR, 84.7% for PR, and 100% for CR, demonstrating a trend that CR was best, followed by PR then NR (P = .02). 10-year OS showed no significant differences (72.7% NR; 84.7% PR; 82.5% CR; P = .10). Greater than 10 liver lesions (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6; P = 0.04) or receiving chemotherapy (HR 3.7; P = .03) were negative predictors of survival.

CONCLUSION

The extent of resection of liver disease in SBNET influenced survival at 5 years but not at 10 years. In addition, more than 10 liver lesions and chemotherapy were predictors of mortality.

Resection of primary tumor in liver only metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors

446

Background: Surgical management of metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NET) remains controversial. Resection of primary tumor only without liver resection is advocated only in select patients, frequently for palliation. Additionally, no standard algorithm exists, and the risk profile for these patients is not well documented in the literature. We evaluated these midgut NETs with liver metastasis in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to determine if resection of the primary tumor only affected survival outcomes. Methods: The NCDB was queried to identify patients with liver only metastatic midgut NET tumors between 2010 and 2015. Patients who underwent surgery of their liver metastasis were excluded. The cohort was separated into two groups, those who underwent resection of the primary tumor and those who did not. Patient demographics, year of diagnosis, clinicopathologic tumor characteristics and Charlson/Deyo comorbidity index were compared among the two groups. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to predict OS. Results: One-thousand nine hundred fifty-two patients with median age of 63 were identified. Median tumor size was 2.4 cm. Of these, 1,295 (66.0%) patients underwent resection of the primary tumor and 667 (34.0%) did not. Patients undergoing resection were younger (median age 63 vs. 65, p < 0.001) and had smaller tumors (median 2.3 cm vs. 3.0 cm, p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups with respect to sex, year of diagnosis or Charlson/Deyo Comorbidity Score. Median follow up time was 42.8 months (IQR 29.7). A total of 483 deaths occurred in the entire cohort with a 5-year OS of 60.8%. The 5-year OS for patients undergoing resection of the primary tumor was 65.9% and 49.3% for those not undergoing resection (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with liver only metastatic midgut neuroendocrine tumors had an overall survival advantage when the primary tumor was resected. Patients with liver only metastatic midgut NET may benefit from surgical resection and should be evaluated for surgery at the time of diagnosis.

Long-Term Outcomes after Elective versus Emergency Surgery for Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) are often indolent, but occasionally, patients present with acute symptoms requiring emergent operative intervention. Our aim was to determine whether emergency surgery for SBNETs affects long-term outcomes. An institutional database was reviewed to identify patients with SBNET diagnosed between 1990 and 2015. Need for emergency resection (ER) was compared with elective resection (ELR). One hundred and thirty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 59 years (range, 21-91), and median tumor size was 1.5 cm (range, 0.1-5). Median follow-up time was 5.5 years. One hundred (74.6%) patients had ELR, whereas 34 (25.4%) required ER. ELR had a higher number of lymph nodes resected (median 12.5 vs 8 ER, P = 0.04); however, there was no difference in the number of positive nodes (median 3 vs 2, P = 0.85). There were 45 (33.6%) recurrences (31 [31.0%] ELR vs 14 [41.7%] ER, P = 0.29) and 13 (9.7%) deaths (7 [7.0%] ELR; 6 [17.6%] ER). There was no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival (ELR 72.6% vs ER 77.9%, P = 0.71) or overall survival (ELR 97.2% vs ER 96.6%, P = 0.81). Although patients undergoing ER have significantly fewer lymph nodes resected, they have comparable recurrence rates and long-term outcomes with those patients undergoing ER.

Long-Term Outcomes after Elective versus Emergency Surgery for Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) are often indolent, but occasionally, patients present with acute symptoms requiring emergent operative intervention. Our aim was to determine whether emergency surgery for SBNETs affects long-term outcomes. An institutional database was reviewed to identify patients with SBNET diagnosed between 1990 and 2015. Need for emergency resection (ER) was compared with elective resection (ELR). One hundred and thirty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 59 years (range, 21–91), and median tumor size was 1.5 cm (range, 0.1–5). Median follow-up time was 5.5 years. One hundred (74.6%) patients had ELR, whereas 34 (25.4%) required ER. ELR had a higher number of lymph nodes resected (median 12.5 vs 8 ER, P = 0.04); however, there was no difference in the number of positive nodes (median 3 vs 2, P = 0.85). There were 45 (33.6%) recurrences (31 [31.0%] ELR vs 14 [41.7%] ER, P = 0.29) and 13 (9.7%) deaths (7 [7.0%] ELR; 6 [17.6%] ER). There was no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival (ELR 72.6% vs ER 77.9%, P = 0.71) or overall survival (ELR 97.2% vs ER 96.6%, P = 0.81). Although patients undergoing ER have significantly fewer lymph nodes resected, they have comparable recurrence rates and long-term outcomes with those patients undergoing ER.

The Impact of Epidural Analgesia on the Rate of Thromboembolism without Chemical Thromboprophylaxis in Major Oncologic Surgery

Patients with abdominopelvic cancers are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to their malignancy. We evaluated outcomes and the rate of VTE in patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery for malignancy with preoperative epidural analgesia without postoperative chemical VTE prophylaxis. A retrospective review between 2009 and 2015 identified 285 patients with malignancy who underwent abdominopelvic surgery by a single surgeon (AWS). Lower extremity venous duplex scans (VDS) were performed preoperatively and before discharge. Demographics, procedures, and VTE outcomes were reviewed. The median age was 66 years. The average operative time was 315 minutes. All patients ambulated on postoperative day (POD) one or two. Epidural catheters (ECs) were removed on postoperative day four or five. No patient received VTE prophylaxis while an epidural catheter was in place. Preoperative lower extremity VDS revealed above-knee deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in seven patients (2.5%). Postoperative lower extremity VDS revealed acute DVT in 24 patients (8.4%): nine (3.2%) above-knee and 15 (5.2%) below-knee. The nine patients with above-knee DVT were anticoagulated after epidural removal. No patient developed a pulmonary embolism. Our data suggest that patients undergoing major open operations with epidural analgesia have low rates of DVT and may obviate the need for chemical prophylaxis. However, larger studies are required to determine the overall effects of epidural analgesia on the development of DVTs postoperatively.

Prognostic Factors Associated with Outcomes in Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNET) account for most gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Patients often present with late-stage disease; however, there is little information regarding factors that contribute to recurrence. Database review identified 301 patients diagnosed with SBNET between 1990 and 2013. Univariate analysis included patients who underwent complete resection. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 147 patients met study criteria. Average age was 60 years (range 21-91); 49 per cent were male. Thirty-seven (25.3%) patients had laparoscopic resection, and 29 (19.9%) patients had only small bowel disease, whereas 108 (72.6%) had nodal metastasis. Five-year overall and disease-free survival were 97.5 and 73.5 per cent. Forty-seven (32%) patients had recurrence. The recurrence group was more likely to have an open operation (59.6 vs 32%, P < 0.01), mesenteric invasion, or lymphatic metastasis (87.2 vs 67%, P < 0.01) compared with the no-recurrence group. Cox regression analysis showed that variables associated with recurrence included nodal disease (HR 9.06, P = 0.03), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (3.95, P < 0.01), perineural invasion (PNI) (3.48, P < 0.01), and mesenteric involvement (3.77, P = 0.03). Patients with SBNET presenting with nodal metastasis, mesenteric involvement, LVI, or PNI have a higher risk of recurrence. Closer surveillance should be considered after operative resection.

Prognostic Factors Associated with Outcomes in Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNET) account for most gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Patients often present with late-stage disease; however, there is little information regarding factors that contribute to recurrence. Database review identified 301 patients diagnosed with SBNET between 1990 and 2013. Univariate analysis included patients who underwent complete resection. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. A total of 147 patients met study criteria. Average age was 60 years (range 21–91); 49 per cent were male. Thirty-seven (25.3%) patients had laparoscopic resection, and 29 (19.9%) patients had only small bowel disease, whereas 108 (72.6%) had nodal metastasis. Five-year overall and disease-free survival were 97.5 and 73.5 per cent. Forty-seven (32%) patients had recurrence. The recurrence group was more likely to have an open operation (59.6 vs 32%, P < 0.01), mesenteric invasion, or lymphatic metastasis (87.2 vs 67%, P < 0.01) compared with the no-recurrence group. Cox regression analysis showed that variables associated with recurrence included nodal disease (HR 9.06, P = 0.03), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (3.95, P < 0.01), perineural invasion (PNI) (3.48, P < 0.01), and mesenteric involvement (3.77, P = 0.03). Patients with SBNET presenting with nodal metastasis, mesenteric involvement, LVI, or PNI have a higher risk of recurrence. Closer surveillance should be considered after operative resection.

The role of pre-operative imaging and double balloon enteroscopy in the surgical management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: Is it necessary?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pre-operative localization of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNET) is important for operative planning. The aim was to determine the effectiveness of pre-operative imaging and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in identifying extent of disease.

METHODS

Database review identified 85 patients with primary SBNET between 2006 and 2013. Analysis included patients who underwent imaging, endoscopy, and surgery at our institution.

RESULTS

Average age was 60.7 years. Sixty-six (77.1%) patients had a primary NET in the ileum. Seventy-two patients (67.3%) underwent CT, 47 (46.7%) had MRI, 44 (46.7%) had somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI), and 41 (39.3%) underwent DBE. The sensitivity of each in identifying the NET was 59.7% for CT, 54% for MRI, 56% for SRI, and 88.1% for DBE. Eighteen (21.2%) patients had primary tumors not identified on imaging. Of these 18, 13 underwent DBE, and 12 of 13 (92.3%) DBEs identified the primary lesion. DBE was significantly better at identifying the primary NET than CT, MRI or SRI (P = 0.004, 0.007, and 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Most SBNETs are identified with a combination of imaging modalities. In those with unidentified primary tumors after imaging, DBE should be considered as it may provide valuable information as to the location of the primary tumor.

Impact of neoadjuvant HER2-directed therapy on HER2 status in breast cancer

e12130

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with HER2-directed therapy has become standard-of-care for most women with potentially curable HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer and is associated with a high pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The HER2 status of residual disease after NAC is not well characterized and could potentially inform clinical decisions about additional systemic therapy. We describe tumoral HER2 status before and after NAC with HER2-directed therapy. Methods: An institutional database was screened to identify patients with stage 1-3 HER2+ breast cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) who received NAC with HER2-directed therapy followed by resection between 2011 and 2015. Clinicopathologic data was collected. Change in HER2 status by FISH and IHC following treatment was described. Results: 99 patients were identified. Median age was 49 years (range 26-85). Pre-treatment median HER2/CEP17 copy number ratio (CNR) for all tumors was 6.3 (range 1.9-20.7) by FISH and 84 (84.8%) tumors were IHC 3+. 44 (44.4%) patients achieved a pCR. Of the 55 patients with residual disease, 35 had sufficient residual tumor to evaluate HER2 status and 14/35 (40%) were HER2- by FISH and IHC (table). Tumors converting from HER2+ to HER2- had lower pre-treatment median HER2 copy numbers (11.9, range 4.6-22) compared to tumors that remained HER2+ (18.3, range 5.1-48.6; p=0.04) after neoadjuvant therapy. Additionally, pre-treatment median HER2/CEP17 CNR was lower among tumors that converted from HER2+ to HER2- (3.0, range 2.2-8.2) compared to those remaining HER2+ (6.8, range 2-15.7; p=0.02). Conclusions: While pCR rates are high with NAC and HER2-directed therapy, many patients still have residual tumor. In this cohort, 40% of patients with evaluable residual disease after NAC had HER2+ tumors that became HER2-. HER2 conversion was associated with lower pre-treatment HER2 copy numbers and HER2/CEP17 CNR. Conversion from HER2+ to HER2- in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy may have clinical significance and biological implications. [Table: see text]

Prognostic factors influencing survival in small bowel neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastasis

e15688

Background: Management of liver metastasis in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNET) remains unclear. Complete surgical resection improves long term survival however factors that influence overall prognosis are not clear. Methods: Database review identified 301 patients diagnosed with SBNET from 1990 to 2013. Only patients with known liver metastasis who underwent resection of the primary tumor were included. Outcomes among patients who underwent complete surgical resection, incomplete debulking of liver metastasis, and resection of the primary tumor alone were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival estimates and Cox regression was used to identify predictors of death. Results: 111 patients met study criteria. Median age was 59 years (range 16-80); 49% were male. The terminal ileum (47/111, 42%) was the most common primary tumor location. The median number of liver lesions was 8.5 (range 1-31) and median lesions resected was 1 (range 0-31). In addition to resection of the primary tumor, 36 patients (32%) had no liver resection (NR), 41 (36.9%) had complete resection of liver disease (R0) and 34 (30%) had incomplete resection of liver metastasis (R1). 58 patients (36%) had one or more wedge resections, 12 (10.8%) underwent segmentectomy and 5 (4.5%) had a lobectomy. 33 (29.7%) patients underwent post-operative chemoembolization, 25 (22.5%) had radioembolization and 23 (20.7%) had radiofrequency ablation. The R1 group differed from the R0 group in median size of primary tumor (2.5 cm R1 vs 1.6 cm R0, p = 0.05) and median number of positive lymph nodes (5.0 R1 vs 3.0 R0, p = 0.05). The 5-year OS was 80.9%, 81.1% and 100% for NR, R1 and R0 groups respectively (p = 0.01). 10-year OS did not differ between groups (72.8% NR vs 81.1% R1vs 82.5% NR, p = 0.31). Cox regression showed post-operative administration of chemotherapy (HR = 3.68, p < 0.01) and higher tumor grade (HR = 18.4, p = 0.02) increased risk of death. Conclusions: In patients with SBNET with liver metastasis, higher tumor grade and post-operative chemotherapy increased risk of death. However, resection of the primary tumor along with liver metastasis improves the 5-year OS with complete cytoreduction providing the most benefit.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgical Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer: A Review of Current Data

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, large tumors, certain biologic subtypes of breast cancer, or locally inoperable disease, and for patients who desire breast conservation. It has the advantage of downstaging the tumor, thereby allowing for conversion from mastectomy to breast conservation, and perhaps decreasing the need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In the past, axillary management involved complete ALND for all patients presenting with breast cancer and involved nodes. With neoadjuvant chemotherapy, some patients exhibit a complete clinical axillary response, which may make them candidates for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) rather than ALND, with its associated morbidities. While there is widespread use of SLNB in the treatment of breast cancer, its use following neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains widely debated.