Complementary roles of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and computed tomography in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma

Propensity matched analysis of DPA or DPL used within the first hour for severely hypotensive blunt trauma patients

Background

Prior single-center reports advocate for use of diagnostic peritoneal aspiration or lavage (DPA/DPL) to identify blunt trauma patients (BTPs) with intra-abdominal hemorrhage who require emergent surgery. Despite this, concerns exist over the potential for DPA/DPL to delay transfer to the operating room (OR). We hypothesized that DPA/DPL application in severely hypotensive BTPs would lead to increased OR transfer time and in-hospital mortality.

Methods

The 2017-2019 TQIP database was queried for adult BTPs presenting with severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <70 mmHg) who underwent any operative intervention within two-hours. Using a 1:2 propensity-score model, patients who underwent DPA/DPL within one-hour of arrival were compared with those who did not, controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, ≥6 units of packed red cells within 4 h, and injury profile.

Results

From 5514 patients, 62 (1.1 %) underwent DPA/DPL. We matched 52 DPA/DPL patients to 104 patients not undergoing DPA/DPL. There were no differences in the matched variables between cohorts (all p > 0.05). Compared to those not undergoing DPA/DPL, patients undergoing DPA/DPL had a higher rate/risk of in-hospital complications (59.6 % vs. 39.4 %, p = 0.02) (OR 2.27, CI 1.15-4.47, p = 0.02) but statistically similar rate/risk of death (65.4 % vs. 50.0 %, p = 0.07) (OR 1.89, CI 0.95-3.76, p = 0.07). Time to OR was similar between both groups (DPA/DPL 39 min vs. non-DPA/DPL 42 min, p = 0.87).

Conclusion

DPA or DPL used within the first hour of arrival does not appear to delay time to OR and does not increase risk of death. This challenges concerns over potential DPA/DPL-associated delays and heightened mortality risks.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography for the Prediction of the Need for Laparotomy for Traumatic Hollow Viscus Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic hollow viscus injury (THVI) is one of the most difficult challenges in the trauma setting. Computed tomography (CT) is the most common modality used to diagnose THVI; however, various performance outcomes of CT have been reported. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze how precise and reliable CT is as a tool for the assessment of THVI.

METHOD

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies on the use of CT to diagnose THVI. Publications were retrieved by performing structured searches in databases, review articles and major textbooks. For the statistical analysis, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were constructed using hierarchical models.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies enrolling 12,514 patients were eligible for the final analysis. The summary sensitivity and specificity of CT for the diagnosis of THVI were 0.678 (95% CI: 0.501-0.809) and 0.969 (95% CI: 0.920-0.989), respectively. The summary false positive rate was 0.031 (95% CI 0.011-0.071).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, we found that CT had indeterminate sensitivity and excellent specificity for the diagnosis of THVI.

Multidetector CT of blunt abdominal trauma

The morbidity, mortality, and economic costs resulting from trauma in general, and blunt abdominal trauma in particular, are substantial. The "panscan" (computed tomographic [CT] examination of the head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis) has become an essential element in the early evaluation and decision-making algorithm for hemodynamically stable patients who sustained abdominal trauma. CT has virtually replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage for the detection of important injuries. Over the past decade, substantial hardware and software developments in CT technology, especially the introduction and refinement of multidetector scanners, have expanded the versatility of CT for examination of the polytrauma patient in multiple facets: higher spatial resolution, faster image acquisition and reconstruction, and improved patient safety (optimization of radiation delivery methods). In this article, the authors review the elements of multidetector CT technique that are currently relevant for evaluating blunt abdominal trauma and describe the most important CT signs of trauma in the various organs. Because conservative nonsurgical therapy is preferred for all but the most severe injuries affecting the solid viscera, the authors emphasize the CT findings that are indications for direct therapeutic intervention.

The role of laparoscopy in abdominal trauma - review of the literature

The necessity of urgent explorative laparotomy as a standard procedure in the treatment of abdominal penetrating wounds is controversial. Mandatory surgical intervention for penetrating abdominal trauma yields a high rate of negative laparotomies in the absence of visceral injuries. Laparoscopy is an alternative diagnostic procedure inspecting the peritoneum for signs of perforation and excluding significant intra-abdominal injuries. Following current guidelines, diagnostic laparoscopy should be used with caution only in selected cases due to the limited amount of reliable data confirming the effectiveness of such treatment. We present a review of the literature analysing the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in abdominal trauma.

Seatbelt injury causing small bowel devascularisation: case series and review of the literature

The use of seatbelts has increased significantly in the last twenty years, leading to a decrease in mortality from road traffic accidents (RTA). However, this increase in seatbelt use has also led to a change in the spectrum of injuries from RTA; abdominal injuries, particularly intestinal injuries have dramatically increased with the routine use of seatbelts. Such intestinal injuries frequently result from improper placement of the “lap belt”. We present 3 cases in which passengers wearing a seatbelt sustained significant devascularisation injuries to the small bowel requiring emergency surgical intervention. A high index of suspicion is crucial in such cases to prevent delays in diagnosis that can lead to severe complications and adverse outcomes. It is evident that while advocating seatbelt use, the importance of education in correct seatbelt placement should also be a focus of public health strategies to reduce RTA morbidity and mortality.

Primary pan-computed tomography for blunt multiple trauma: can the whole be better than its parts?

Single-pass, whole-body computed tomography (pan-CT) was proposed in the late 1990s as a new concept for the diagnostic work-up of severely injured patients. Since its introduction, it has led to considerable debate among clinicians and scientists, triggered by concerns about its immediate safety, questionable therapeutic advantages and exposure to radiation. However, it was recently shown that pan-CT scanning may be associated with a reduction in trauma mortality. In this article, we provide an overview of current knowledge of the value of this compelling concept. The diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row CT (MDCT) for clearing various anatomical regions in trauma patients is, at best, unclear. Little is known about the accuracy of pan-CT as a whole, which weakens statements about its effectiveness and prevents inferences about survival advantages. This last point may be explained by a stage-migration or "Will Rogers" phenomenon: Pan-CT increases injury severity by detecting lesions that would not have been recognized by conventional methods but still do not affect treatment decisions, thus artificially lowering the ratio of observed to expected deaths. In order to maintain the credibility of pan-CT technology for trauma, a rigorous, large-scale evaluation of its accuracy is required. Such an evaluation requires consensus about the definition of true and false positive and negative findings in the setting of blunt multiple trauma. In addition, triage criteria need to be refined to increase specificity and reduce the number of unnecessary scans.

Abdominal trauma: from operative to nonoperative management

The nonoperative care of intraabdominal trauma in the polytraumatised patient greatly depends on imaging techniques. The haemodynamically unstable patient should undergo expedient sonography to rule out abdominal haemorrhage. The use of computer tomography (CT) in this difficult patient group is also currently evaluated, however it takes specific amendments to the protocol and institution. In the hemodynamically stable patient however, computer tomography is the modality of choice to evaluate the injured abdomen. Nonoperative treatment can be successful in up to 80% of selected cases. Adjuncts to nonoperative care include embolisation of the spleen and liver in cases of arterial bleeding, and endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreaticography (ERCP) and stenting for injuries to the biliary tree.

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: a review of indications, technique, and interpretation

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) is a highly accurate test for evaluating intraperitoneal hemorrhage or a ruptured hollow viscus, but is performed less frequently today due to the increased use of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) and helical computed tomography (CT). All three of these exams have advantages and disadvantages and thus each still play unique roles in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. Since DPL is performed less frequently today, a review of its indications, technique, and interpretation is pertinent.

The evolution of the diagnostic work-up for stab wounds to the back and flank

BACKGROUND

Stab wounds to the back and flank infrequently cause injuries requiring operative treatment. Triple-contrast CT scan (3CT) has essentially replaced diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) as the primary means of identifying patients who require operative intervention. This study aims to review the evolution of the diagnostic work-up for stab wounds to the back and flank.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of haemodynamically stable patients with stab wound to the back or flank treated at a single Level 1 trauma centre over a 10-year period. Diagnostic accuracy of DPL and 3CT screening tests were evaluated against the patient's subsequent clinical course. The elapsed time between emergency department (ED) presentation and test results was recorded and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 177 patients were identified. 76 patients had stab wounds isolated to the back, 90 had stab wounds isolated to the flank and 11 had wounds in both locations. CT ultimately became the predominant initial diagnostic test during the study period. Although less frequently used over time, DPL retained good sensitivity and specificity for injuries requiring operative intervention (92% and 83%, respectively). 3CT identified all injuries requiring laparotomy (100% sensitivity) and had a specificity of 96%. 3CT was a more time-consuming process, with results available at a median of 3:31h after arrival to the ED, as compared to 1:03h for DPL (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

3CT diagnosed all injuries requiring operative intervention, and its use was associated with a lower rate of non-therapeutic laparotomies. However, average time to diagnosis by 3CT was prolonged compared to DPL. Although 3CT has become the predominant diagnostic test when evaluating patients with stab wounds to the back and flank at our institution, efforts to further expedite the diagnostic work-up are necessary.

Diagnostic peritoneal aspiration--the foster child of DPL: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The abdomen is routinely considered as a possible source of bleeding in hypotensive and unevaluable blunt multitrauma patients. These patients are often unstable to be transported for abdominal computed tomography (CT). Emerging data on Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) exam questions its initially reported high accuracy. We hypothesized that Diagnostic Peritoneal Aspiration (DPA), without a full lavage, accurately detects intraperitoneal blood if present in sufficient volume to cause hypotension and warrant emergent operation.

METHODS

Over 24 months (July 2002-June 2004), 62 severe blunt trauma patients (Injury Severity Score: 32+/-17) with admission systolic blood pressure equal to or less than 90 mmHg were enrolled prospectively. Percutaneous DPA was performed after FAST. Aspiration of any quantity of blood was considered a positive test. Sensitivity and specificity of DPA and FAST were calculated against findings from abdominal CT, laparotomy, or autopsy.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (35%) required emergent laparotomy and 39 (63%) died. DPA was performed in less than 1 min with no complications. Sensitivity and specificity of DPA was 89% and 100%, respectively, whereas for FAST it was 50% and 95%. Two (3%) false negative DPA were recorded; one patient had a minor liver laceration with 250 ml of free blood and the other a leaking retroperitoneal pelvic hematoma in the presence of cirrhosis with 600 ml of bloody ascitic fluid. There were no false positive DPA. Nine (14.5%) false negative and two (3%) false positive FAST were recorded in patients who were found to have at laparotomy 1575+/-1070 ml of hemoperitoneum on average.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous DPA is accurate, rapid, safe, and superior to FAST for the diagnosis of abdominal blood as the source of hemodynamic instability, requiring emergent surgery, in blunt multitrauma patients.

Pancreatic Injury in the Athlete

Pancreatic injuries in the athlete are seldom reported in the literature. These injuries can result from atraumatic etiologies and blunt abdominal trauma. Atraumatic pancreatic injuries in the athlete are diagnosed and treated in a similar manner to the nonathletic patient. Fluid replacement, analgesic support, metabolic stabilization, and minimization of gastric stimulation are the primary management methods for this type of pancreatic injury. Athletically related traumatic pancreatic injury is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. The consequences of a delayed diagnosis make this type of injury an important diagnostic consideration in an athlete with abdominal pain. Initial clinical, radiologic, and laboratory findings of direct injury to the pancreas are often equivocal, and require clinical suspicion and further investigation. Current evidence suggests that pancreatic duct injury is the primary cause of the morbidity and mortality associated with the direct trauma. A conservative or surgical management plan should be based on a combination of serial clinical examinations, pancreatic enzyme levels, and either magnetic resonance retrograde choleopancreatogram or endoscopic retrograde chloangiopancreatography investigations to rule out ductal injury. The prevention of pancreatic and other intra-abdominal injuries is an evolving area of sports medicine research. Sports specific epidemiologic data collection and analysis are important elements in the development of evidence-based interventions.

[Shock trauma room diagnosis: initial diagnosis after blunt abdominal trauma. A review of the literature]

OBJECTIVE

Blunt abdominal trauma is most common in the polytraumatized patient and beside neurocranial trauma one major determinant of early death in these patients. Therefore, immediate recognition of an abdominal injury is of life-saving importance.

METHODS

Clinical trials were systematically collected (Medline, Cochrane and hand searches) and classified into evidence levels (1 to 5 according to the Oxford system).

RESULTS

Clinical examination is not reliable for evaluation of abdominal injury. Abdominal ultrasound, especially if only focusing on free fluid (FAST) is not sensitive enough. Today, CT-scan of the abdomen is the gold-standard in diagnosing abdominal injury. Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage (DPL) has a high sensitivity but in our region only is used in exceptional cases. The patient with continuing hemodynamical instability after abdominal trauma and evidence of free intraperitonial fluid has to undergo laparotomy.

CONCLUSION

After blunt abdominal trauma, initially ultrasound investigation should be performed in the emergency room. This should not only focus on free intraabdominal fluid but also on organ lesions. Regardless of the findings from ultrasound or clinical examination, the hemodynamically stable patient should undergo a CT-scan of the abdomen in order to proof or exclude an abdominal injury.

Hepatic trauma: CT findings and considerations based on our experience in emergency diagnostic imaging

Abdominal blunt trauma represents the main cause of death in people of age less than 40 years; the liver injury occurs frequently, with an incidence varying from 3 to 10%. Isolated hepatic lesions are rare and in 77-90% of cases, lesions of other organs and viscera are involved. Right hepatic lobe is a frequent site of injury, because it is the more voluminous portion of liver parenchyma; posterior superior hepatic segments are proximal to fixed anatomical structures such as ribs and spine that may have an important role in determining of the lesion. The coronal ligaments' insertion in this parenchymal region augments the effect of acceleration-deceleration mechanism. Associated lesions usually are homolateral costal fractures, laceration or contusion of the inferior right pulmonary lobe, haemothorax, pneumothorax, renal and/or adrenal lesions. Traumatic lesions of left hepatic lobe are rare and usually associated with direct impact on the superior abdomen, such as in car-crash when the wheel causes a compressive effect on thorax and abdomen. Associated lesions to left hepatic lobe injuries correlated to this mechanism are: sternal fractures, pancreatic, myocardial, gastrointestinal tract injuries. Lesions of the caudal lobe are extremely rare, usually not isolated and noted with other large parenchymal lesions. The Institution of Specialized Trauma Centers and the technical progress in imaging methodology developed in the last years a great reduction of mortality. New diagnostic methodologies allow a reduction of negatives laparotomies and allow the possibility of conservative treatment of numerous traumatic lesions; however, therapy depends from imaging findings and clinical conditions of the patient. Computed tomography (CT) certainly presents a large impact on diagnosis and management of patients with lesions from blunt abdominal traumas. It is important to establish a prognostic criteria allowing decisions for conservative or surgical treatment; CT findings and peritoneal fluid evaluation may be used to make a first differentiation of severity of lesions, but haemodynamic parameters may help the clinician to prefer a conservative treatment. In emergency based hospitals and also in our experience, positive benefits spring from diagnostic accuracy and consequent correct therapeutic management.

The role of computed tomography in diagnosis of blunt intestinal and mesenteric trauma (BIMT)

Blunt intestinal mesenteric trauma (BIMT) is a rare injury with a high morbidity and mortality. It is a diagnostic dilemma for Trauma Surgeons and Emergency Physicians. This study was undertaken to assess the role of computed tomography (CT) in BIMT. Data were analyzed from 1995 to 2002. Thirty-six cases of BIMT were identified: 16 isolated and 20 non-isolated injuries. Initial CT scan was abnormal in 74% (17 out of 23), and 83% on retrospect (2 additional cases). CT scans were abnormal (initial and repeat) in 96% (22 out of 23). The most common abnormalities were free fluid (78%), mesenteric stranding or edema (39%), bowel wall hematoma, or edema (30%). Free air was seen in 31% and oral contrast extravasation in 15% of cases of bowel perforation. CT scan findings in BIMT can be subtle and non-specific. Suspicion of BIMT warrants close observation and probably further diagnostic testing.

Blunt injury to mesentery and small bowel:

Helical CT now allows rapid acquisition of sections through the abdomen and pelvis with optimal vascular opacification and minimal motion artifact. Oral contrast may aid in the identification of subtle bowel and mesenteric injuries and does not have any significant deleterious effects. CT findings of extraluminal enteric contrast, active hemorrhage, or free intraperitoneal-retroperitoneal air allow accurate diagnosis of SBMI in the setting of blunt abdominal trauma. Mesenteric hematoma in association with bowel wall thickening or the presence of significant amounts of free fluid without solid organ injury is highly suspicious for SBMI requiring laparotomy. CT alone or in concert with DPL and physical examination is a valuable tool in the timely diagnosis and treatment of bowel and mesenteric injury caused by blunt trauma.

Imaging of renal trauma

Trauma is a major cause of death and disability and renal injuries occur in up to 10% of patients with significant blunt abdominal trauma. Patients with penetrating trauma and hematuria, blunt trauma with shock and hematuria, or gross hematuria warrant imaging of the urinary tract specifically and CT is the preferred modality. If there is significant perinephric fluid, especially medially, or deep laceration, delayed images should be obtained to evaluate for urinary extravasation. Most renal injuries are minor, including contusions, subcapsular and perinephric hematoma, and superficial lacerations. More significant injuries include deep lacerations, shattered kidney, active hemorrhage, infarctions, and vascular pedicle and UPJ injuries. These injuries are more likely to need surgery or have delayed complications but may still often be managed conservatively. The presence of urinary extravasation and large devitalized areas of renal parenchyma, especially with associated injuries of intraperitoneal organs, is particularly prone to complication and usually requires surgery. Active hemorrhage should be recognized because it often indicates a need for urgent surgery or embolization to prevent exsanguination.