Preliminary report on the safety of heparin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis after severe head injury

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of early vs. delayed pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses significant health challenges, often leading to complications such as venous thromboembolism (VTE) and increased mortality rates. The administration of early post-traumatic prophylaxis (PTP) is intended to mitigate these risks and enhance overall patient recovery. This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing clinical outcomes associated with early versus late pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in TBI patients.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search across PubMed and Scopus databases from their inception to March 2024. Data from eligible studies were aggregated using the generic inverse variance method, with outcomes reported as odds ratios (OR).

RESULTS

The review encompassed 20 studies involving 87,726 patients. Early PTP was categorized based on the timing of administration: 1) within 24 h, 2) within 48 h, and 3) within 72 h of hospital admission. Our findings indicated that early prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and overall mortality when compared to late administration. Specifically, early PTP was associated with a markedly lower risk of VTE (OR: 0.38; 95 % CI: 0.30 to 0.48; P < 0.00001), DVT (OR: 0.32; 95 % CI: 0.25 to 0.41; P < 0.00001), and PE (OR: 0.39; 95 % CI: 0.31 to 0.49; P < 0.00001). Furthermore, the analysis revealed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality within the early PTP group (OR: 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.53 to 0.97; P = 0.03). However, while statistically significant improvements were observed in the <48-hour subgroup, neither the <24-hour nor <72-hour groups achieved statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

These robust findings highlight the potential of early pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis as a crucial intervention to enhance patient outcomes following traumatic brain injuries.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in operative traumatic brain injury

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant complication in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but the optimal timing of pharmacological prophylaxis in operative cases remains controversial.

Methods

This retrospective study aimed to describe the timing of pharmacological prophylaxis initiation in operative TBI cases, stratified by surgery type, and to report the frequency of worsening postoperative intracranial pathology.

Results

Data from 90 surgical TBI patients were analyzed, revealing that 87.8% received VTE pharmacological prophylaxis at a mean of 85 hours postsurgery. The timing of initiation varied by procedure, with burr holes having the earliest start at a mean of 66 h. Craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy had the longest delay, with means of 116 and 109 h, respectively. Worsening intracranial pathology occurred in 5.6% of patients, with only one case occurring after VTE pharmacological prophylaxis initiation. The overall VTE rate was 3.3%.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that initiating VTE pharmacological prophylaxis between 3 and 5 days postsurgery may be safe in operative TBI patients, with the timing dependent on the procedure's invasiveness. The low frequencies of worsening intracranial pathology and VTE support the safety of these proposed timeframes. However, the study's limitations, including its single-center retrospective nature and lack of a standardized protocol, necessitate further research to confirm these findings and establish evidence-based guidelines for VTE pharmacological prophylaxis in operative TBI patients.

A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, hybrid type II trial of interoperable clinical decision support to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for patients with traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable medical condition which has substantial impact on patient morbidity, mortality, and disability. Unfortunately, adherence to the published best practices for VTE prevention, based on patient centered outcomes research (PCOR), is highly variable across U.S. hospitals, which represents a gap between current evidence and clinical practice leading to adverse patient outcomes. This gap is especially large in the case of traumatic brain injury (TBI), where reluctance to initiate VTE prevention due to concerns for potentially increasing the rates of intracranial bleeding drives poor rates of VTE prophylaxis. This is despite research which has shown early initiation of VTE prophylaxis to be safe in TBI without increased risk of delayed neurosurgical intervention or death. Clinical decision support (CDS) is an indispensable solution to close this practice gap; however, design and implementation barriers hinder CDS adoption and successful scaling across health systems. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) informed by PCOR evidence can be deployed using CDS systems to improve the evidence to practice gap. In the Scaling AcceptabLE cDs (SCALED) study, we will implement a VTE prevention CPG within an interoperable CDS system and evaluate both CPG effectiveness (improved clinical outcomes) and CDS implementation.

METHODS

The SCALED trial is a hybrid type 2 randomized stepped wedge effectiveness-implementation trial to scale the CDS across 4 heterogeneous healthcare systems. Trial outcomes will be assessed using the RE2-AIM planning and evaluation framework. Efforts will be made to ensure implementation consistency. Nonetheless, it is expected that CDS adoption will vary across each site. To assess these differences, we will evaluate implementation processes across trial sites using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) implementation framework (a determinant framework) using mixed-methods. Finally, it is critical that PCOR CPGs are maintained as evidence evolves. To date, an accepted process for evidence maintenance does not exist. We will pilot a "Living Guideline" process model for the VTE prevention CDS system.

DISCUSSION

The stepped wedge hybrid type 2 trial will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of CDS based on the Berne-Norwood criteria for VTE prevention in patients with TBI. Additionally, it will provide evidence regarding a successful strategy to scale interoperable CDS systems across U.S. healthcare systems, advancing both the fields of implementation science and health informatics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov - NCT05628207. Prospectively registered 11/28/2022, https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT05628207 .

The safety of early pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

In patients with traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (tICH) there is significant risk of both venous thromboembolism (VTE) and haemorrhage progression. There is a paucity of literature to inform the timing of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (PTP) initiation.

AIM

This meta-analysis aims to summarise the current literature on the timing of PTP initiation in tICH.

METHODS

This meta-analysis followed the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews checklist and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Following the literature search, studies were matched against the criteria for inclusion. Data from included studies was pooled, analysed using random-effect analysis and presented as forest plots of risk ratios, except one result reported as difference of means. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. The GRADE approach was taken to assess the quality of included studies. Heterogeneity of studies was assessed using Tau∧2. Funnel plots were generated and used in conjunction with Harbord's test and Rucker's arcsine to assess for small-study effect including publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 9927 ICH patients who received PTP were included from 15 retrospective observational cohort studies, 4807 patients received early PTP, the remaining 5120 received late PTP. The definition of early was dependent on the study but no more than 72-hours after admission. The mean age of the included cohort was 45.3 (std dev ±9.5) years, and the proportion of males was 71%. Meta-analysis indicated that there was a significant difference between early and late groups for the rate of VTE (RR, 0.544; p = 0.000), pulmonary embolus (RR, 0.538; p = 0.004), deep vein thrombosis (RR, 0.484; p = 0.000) and the intensive care unit length of stay (difference of means, -2.021; 95% CI, -2.250, -1.792; p = 0.000; Tau∧2 = 0.000), favouring the early group. However, the meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the groups for the rate of mortality (RR, 1.008; p = 0.936), tICH progression (RR, 0.853; p = 0.157), and neurosurgical intervention (RR, 0.870; p = 0.480).

CONCLUSION

These findings indicated that early PTP appears to be safe and effective in patients with tICH.

Early venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with trauma intracranial hemorrhage: Analysis of the prospective multicenter Consortium of Leaders in Traumatic Thromboembolism study

BACKGROUND

The optimal time to initiate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTEp) for patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is controversial and must balance the risks of VTE with potential progression of ICH. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early VTEp initiation after traumatic ICH.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the prospective multicenter Consortium of Leaders in the Study of Thromboembolism study. Patients with head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of > 2 and with immediate VTEp held because of ICH were included. Patients were divided into VTEp ≤ or >48 hours and compared. Outcome variables included overall VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, progression of intracranial hemorrhage (pICH), or other bleeding events. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed.

RESULTS

There were 881 patients in total; 378 (43%) started VTEp ≤48 hours (early). Patients starting VTEp >48 hours (late) had higher VTE (12.4% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.01) and DVT (11.0% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.01) rates than the early group. The incidence of pulmonary embolism (2.1% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.94), pICH (1.9% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.95), or any other bleeding event (1.9% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.28) was equivalent between early and late VTEp groups. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, VTEp >48 hours (odds ratio [OR], 1.86), ventilator days >3 (OR, 2.00), and risk assessment profile score of ≥5 (OR, 6.70) were independent risk factors for VTE (all p < 0.05), while VTEp with enoxaparin was associated with decreased VTE (OR, 0.54, p < 0.05). Importantly, VTEp ≤48 hours was not associated with pICH (OR, 0.75) or risk of other bleeding events (OR, 1.28) (both p = NS).

CONCLUSION

Early initiation of VTEp (≤48 hours) for patients with ICH was associated with decreased VTE/DVT rates without increased risk of pICH or other significant bleeding events. Enoxaparin is superior to unfractionated heparin as VTE prophylaxis in patients with severe TBI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Retrospective evaluation of chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in traumatic brain injury

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) but few studies address optimal timing or choice of agent.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective review of moderate to severe TBI patients receiving chemical VTE prophylaxis (early initiation [≤ 72 h from admission], late [> 72 h to 7 days], or delayed [> 7 days]) between 2012 through 2017. Primary outcome was VTE occurrence. Secondary objectives evaluated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) requiring cessation of prophylaxis and differences between unfractionated (UFH) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH).

Results

A total of 198 patients were evaluated; median age was 44 years (IQR 25-60), median Glasgow Coma Scale score 3 (IQR 3-7), and median injury severity score 27 (IQR 22-34). Ten percent of patients (n = 20) developed VTE. Median time to VTE prophylaxis was 81 h (IQR 53-152) and there was no difference in VTE incidence across all groups (p = 0.09). Intergroup comparison showed patients that received early prophylaxis had lower VTE rates (6% vs. 16%, p = 0.04) and mortality (3% vs. 15%, p = 0.02) compared to late initiation (but not delayed). There were no instances of new onset or expanded ICH requiring cessation of prophylaxis. VTE rates for patients receiving UFH only or LMWH only, 14/115 (12.2%) vs. 3/46 (6.5%), were not different (p = 0.4). Mortality was lower in the LMWH only group (0% vs. 13.0%, p<0.01).

Conclusions

Initiating VTE prophylaxis within 72 h of moderate to severe TBI appears to be safe and may be associated with lower rates of VTE and mortality.

Increased incidence of venous thromboembolism associated with inferior vena cava filter placement in patients diagnosed with isolated calf deep vein thrombosis after intracranial hemorrhage or intracranial operation

In this study, we sought to investigate the effectiveness of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in reducing the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients diagnosed with isolated calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after an intracranial hemorrhage or intracranial operation. A retrospective chart review (January 2000-December 2019) was performed to identify patients diagnosed with calf DVT after intracranial hemorrhage or intracranial operation. A total of 100 patients met the study criteria and were divided into groups based on treatment: IVC filter placement (n = 22), prophylactic anticoagulation (n = 42), or imaging surveillance (n = 36). Treatment-related complications were identified, and differences between groups in the primary endpoint (VTE occurrence after DVT diagnosis) were assessed using logistic regression. VTE occurred in 15 patients after calf DVT diagnosis. The rate of VTE was higher in the IVC filter group (9/22; 41%) than in the anticoagulation (2/42; 5%; p = 0.002) and surveillance (4/36; 11%; p = 0.013) groups. These treatment effects remained significant after adjustments were made for baseline characteristics (IVC filter vs anticoagulation, p = 0.009; IVC filter vs surveillance, p = 0.019). There was a single occurrence of pulmonary embolism in the surveillance group (3%). A single case of IVC filter thrombus was identified; no anticoagulation-related complications were reported. The findings of this study do not support IVC filter placement as a primary and solitary treatment for isolated calf DVT occurring after intracranial hemorrhage or intracranial operation.

Effect of Pre-Management Antithrombotic Agent Use on Outcome after Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly: A Systematic Review

Traumatic acute subdural hematomas (ASDH) are common in elderly patients (age ≥65 years) and are associated with a poorer prognosis compared with younger populations. Antithrombotic agent (ATA) use is also common in the elderly; however, the influence that pre-morbid ATA has on outcome in ASDH is poorly understood. We hypothesized that pre-morbid ATA use significantly worsens outcomes in elderly patients presenting with traumatic ASDH. English language medical literature was searched for articles relating to ATA use in the elderly with ASDH. Data were collated and appraised where possible. Analyses of study bias were performed. Twelve articles encompassing 2038 patients were included; controls were poorly described in the included studies. Pre-morbid ATA use was seen in 1042 (51.1%) patients and 18 different ATA combination therapies were identified, with coumarins being the most common single agent used. The newer direct oral anticoagulants were evaluated in only two studies. ATA use was associated with a lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score but not hematoma volume on computed tomography (CT) or post-operative hematoma re-accumulation. No studies connected ATA use with patient outcomes without the presence of confounders and bias. Reversal strategies, bridging therapy, recommencement of ATA, and comparison groups were poorly described; accordingly, our hypothesis was rejected. ATA reversal methods, identification of surgical candidates, optimal surgery methods, and when or whether ATA should be recommenced following ASDH resolution remain topics of debate. This study defines our current understanding on this topic, revealing clear deficiencies in the literature with recommendations for future research.

Heparin and Its Derivatives: Challenges and Advances in Therapeutic Biomolecules

Heparin has been extensively studied as a safe medicine and biomolecule over the past few decades. Heparin derivatives, including low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) and heparin pentasaccharide, are effective anticoagulants currently used in clinical settings. They have also been studied as functional biomolecules or biomaterials for various therapeutic uses to treat diseases. Heparin, which has a similar molecular structure to heparan sulfate, can be used as a remarkable biomedicine due to its uniquely high safety and biocompatibility. In particular, it has recently drawn attention for use in drug-delivery systems, biomaterial-based tissue engineering, nanoformulations, and new drug-development systems through molecular formulas. A variety of new heparin-based biomolecules and conjugates have been developed in recent years and are currently being evaluated for use in clinical applications. This article reviews heparin derivatives recently studied in the field of drug development for the treatment of various diseases.

A Stitch in Time Saves Clots: Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis (VTE-CHEMO) is often delayed in patients with traumatic brain injury because of the concern for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression. We hypothesize that (1) late time to VTE-CHEMO (≥48 h) is associated with higher incidence of VTE, and (2) VTE-CHEMO use does not correlate with ICH progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a multiinstitutional retrospective study of patients with traumatic brain injury admitted between 2014 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were head Abbreviated Injury Code ≥2, ICH present on initial head computed tomography, and two or more head computed tomography scans after admission. The primary outcome was VTE, and the secondary outcome was ICH progression. Patients were classified as receiving VTE-CHEMO early (<48 h) or late (≥48 h). Multivariable analysis with Cox proportional hazards regression was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 1803 patients were included. Patients with VTE (n = 137) were more likely to have spinal cord injury, blunt cerebrovascular injury, pelvic or femur fractures, and missed VTE-CHEMO doses. After multivariable regression, body mass index >30 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; P = 0.002), Injury Severity Score (HR, 1.004; P < 0.001), pelvic or femur fractures (HR, 1.05; P < 0.0001), spinal cord injury (HR, 1.28; P = 0.02), and missed VTE-CHEMO doses (HR, 1.08; P = 0.01) were significant predictors of VTE. In those who required neurosurgery, late VTE-CHEMO predicted VTE (HR, 1.21; P = 0.0001). Overall, 32% patients experienced ICH progression, which did not correlate with VTE-CHEMO use or timing.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study highlights benefits from early VTE-CHEMO and identifies high-risk groups who may benefit from more aggressive prophylaxis. These data also emphasize risk to patients by withholding VTE-CHEMO.

Effect of preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy on hemorrhagic complications in patients with traumatic brain injury undergoing craniotomy or craniectomy

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common among the elderly, often treated with antiplatelet (AP) or anticoagulation (AC) therapy, creating new challenges in neurosurgery. In contrast to elective craniotomy, in which AP/AC therapy is mostly discontinued, in TBI usually no delay in treatment can be afforded. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of AP/AC therapy on postoperative bleeding after craniotomy/craniectomy in TBI.

METHODS

Postoperative bleeding rates in patients treated with AP/AC therapy (blood thinner group) and in those without AP/AC therapy (control group) were retrospectively compared. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for postoperative bleeding. Lastly, a proportional Cox regression analysis comparing postoperative bleeding events within 14 days in both groups was performed.

RESULTS

Of 143 consecutive patients undergoing craniotomy/craniectomy for TBI between 2012 and 2017, 47 (32.9%) were under AP/AC treatment. No significant difference for bleeding events was observed in univariate (40.4% blood thinner group vs 36.5% control group; p = 0.71) or Cox proportional regression analysis (log rank χ2 = 0.29, p = 0.59). Patients with postoperative bleeding showed a significantly higher mortality rate (p = 0.035). In the univariate analysis, hemispheric lesion, acute subdural hematoma, hematological disease, greater extent of midline shift, and pupillary difference were significantly associated with a higher risk of postoperative bleeding. However, in the multivariate regression analysis none of these factors showed a significant association with postoperative bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with AP/AC therapy undergoing craniotomy/craniectomy due to TBI do not appear to have increased rates of postoperative bleeding. Once postoperative bleeding occurs, mortality rates rise significantly.

Readmission with venous thromboembolism after surgical treatment by primary cancer site

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, high-mortality condition among surgical cancer patients. Comprehensive analyses of VTE among postoperative cancer patients are lacking. We sought to determine the association between readmission with VTE and primary cancer diagnosis in a nationwide database at 90- and 180-days after initial admission for cancer surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of post-surgical cancer patients readmitted with VTE were conducted using data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) (2010-2014). Multivariate logistic regression models adjusting for patient and hospital factors were used to determine 90- and 180-day readmission rates for VTE by cancer type. Patient factors associated with readmission were also examined.

RESULTS

Among a sample of 535,992 cancer patients undergoing tumor resection, readmission with VTE occurred in 1.7% within 90-days and 2.3% within 180-days. Patients readmitted for VTE experienced a 7% mortality rate. Highest rates of VTE readmission at 180 days occurred in brain (6.7%), pancreatic (5.6%), and respiratory and intrathoracic cancers (4.4%). Using pancreatic cancer as reference, brain cancer had the highest odds of readmission at 180-days (OR 2.23, 95% CI [1.95-2.55]).

CONCLUSION

Readmission with VTE among surgical cancer patients occurred in 2.3% of patients within 180 days. Among cancer types, primary brain cancer was independently associated with readmission with VTE.

Chemoprophylaxis and Venous Thromboembolism in Traumatic Brain Injury at Different Trauma Centers

Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Because of concerns of worsening intracranial hemorrhage, clinicians are hesitant to start VTE chemoprophylaxis in this population. We hypothesized that ACS Level I trauma centers would be more aggressive with VTE chemoprophylaxis in adults with severe TBI than Level II centers. We also predicted that Level I centers would have a lower risk of VTE. We queried the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010–2016) database for patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale scores of 4 and 5 of the head and compared them based on treating the hospital trauma level. Of 204,895 patients with severe TBI, 143,818 (70.2%) were treated at Level I centers and 61,077 (29.8%) at Level II centers. The Level I cohort had a higher rate of VTE chemoprophylaxis use (43.2% vs 23.3%, P < 0.001) and a shorter median time to chemoprophylaxis (61.9 vs 85.9 hours, P < 0.001). Although Level I trauma centers started VTE chemoprophylaxis more often and earlier than Level II centers, there was no difference in the risk of VTE ( P = 0.414) after controlling for covariates. Future prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the timing, safety, and efficacy of early VTE chemoprophylaxis in severe TBI patients.

Anticoagulant prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism following severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective observational study and systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), however, anticoagulant prophylaxis remains controversial due to concerns of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression. We examined anticoagulant prophylaxis practice patterns at a major trauma centre and determined risk estimates for VTE and ICH progression classified by timing of anticoagulant initiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 1-year prospective analysis of consecutive patients with severe TBI admitted to a Level-I trauma centre was conducted. In addition, we systematically reviewed the literature to identify studies on VTE and anticoagulant prophylaxis after severe TBI.

RESULTS

64 severe TBI patients were included. 83% of patients received anticoagulant prophylaxis, initiated ≥3d post-TBI in 67%. The in-hospital VTE incidence was 16% and there was no significant difference between patients who received early (<3d) versus late (≥3d) prophylaxis (10% vs. 16%). Rates of ICH progression (0% vs. 7%) were similar between groups. Our systematic review identified 5 studies with VTE rates ranging from 5 to 10% with prophylaxis, to 11-30% without prophylaxis. The effect of timing of anticoagulant prophylaxis initiation on ICH progression was not reported in any study.

CONCLUSION

VTE is a common complication after severe TBI. Anticoagulant prophylaxis is often started late (≥3d) post-injury. Randomized trials are justifiable and necessary to provide practice guidance with regards to optimal timing of anticoagulant prophylaxis.

A Systematic Review of the Risks and Benefits of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, initiation of pharmacological venous thromboprophylaxis (VTEp) may cause further intracranial hemorrhage. We reviewed the literature to determine the postinjury time interval at which VTEp can be administered without risk of TBI evolution and hematoma expansion.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were studies investigating timing and safety of VTEp in TBI patients not previously on oral anticoagulation. Two investigators extracted data and graded the papers' levels of evidence. Randomized controlled trials were assessed for bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration Tool and Cohort studies were evaluated for bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We performed univariate meta-regression analysis in an attempt to identify a relationship between VTEp timing and hemorrhagic progression and assess study heterogeneity using an I 2 statistic.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Eighteen total studies demonstrated that VTEp postinjury in patients with stable head computed tomography scan does not lead to TBI progression. Fourteen studies demonstrated that VTEp administration 24 to 72 hours postinjury is safe in patients with stable injury. Four studies suggested that administering VTEp within 24 hours of injury in patients with stable TBI does not lead to progressive intracranial hemorrhage. Overall, meta-regression analysis demonstrated that there was no relationship between rate of hemorrhagic progression and VTEp timing.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature suggests that administering VTEp 24 to 48 hours postinjury may be safe for patients with low-hemorrhagic-risk TBIs and stable injury on repeat imaging.

A systematic review of 30-day readmission after cranial neurosurgery

OBJECTIVE

The 30-day readmission rate has emerged as an important marker of the quality of in-hospital care in several fields of medicine. This review aims to summarize available research reporting readmission rates after cranial procedures and to establish an association with demographic, clinical, and system-related factors and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic review of several databases; a manual search of the Journal of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery, Acta Neurochirurgica, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences; and the cited references of the selected articles. Quality review was performed using the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) criteria. Findings are reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 1344 articles published between 1947 and 2015 were identified; 25 were considered potentially eligible, of which 12 met inclusion criteria. The 30-day readmission rates varied from 6.9% to 23.89%. Complications arising during or after neurosurgical procedures were a prime reason for readmission. Race, comorbidities, and longer hospital stay put patients at risk for readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Although readmission may be an important indicator for good care for the subset of acutely declining patients, neurosurgery should aim to reduce 30-day readmission rates with improved quality of care through systemic changes in the care of neurosurgical patients that promote preventive measures.

Lethal Trauma Pulmonary Embolism is a Black Swan Event in Patients at Risk for Deep Vein Thrombosis: An Evidence-Based Review

We delineated the incidence of trauma patient pulmonary embolism (PE) and risk conditions by performing a systematic literature review of those at risk for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The PE proportion was 1.4 per cent (95% confidence interval = 1.2–1.6) in at-risk patients. Of 10 conditions, PE was only associated with increased age (P < 0.01) or leg injury (P < 0.01; risk ratio = 1.6). As lower extremity DVT (LEDVT) proportions increased, mortality proportions (P = 0.02) and hospital stay (P = 0.0002) increased, but PE proportions did not (P = 0.13). LEDVT was lower with chemoprophylaxis (CP) (4.9%) than without CP (19.1%; P < 0.01). PEwas lower withCP (1.0%) than without CP (2.2%; P = 0.0004). Mortality was lower with CP (6.6%) than without CP (11.6%; P = 0.002). PE was similar with (1.2%) and without (1.9%; P = 0.19) mechanical prophylaxis (MP). LEDVT was lower with MP (8.5%) than without MP (12.2%; P = 0.0005). PE proportions were similar with (1.3%) and without (1.5%; P = 0.24) LEDVTsurveillance. Mortality was higher with LEDVTsurveillance (7.9%) than without (4.8%; P < 0.01). A PE mortality of 19.7 per cent (95% confidence interval = 18–22) 3 a 1.4 per cent PE proportion yielded a 0.28 per cent lethal PE proportion. As PE proportions increased, mortality (P = 0.52) and hospital stay (P = 0.13) did not. Of 176 patients with PE, 76 per cent had no LEDVT. In trauma patients at risk for DVT, PE is infrequent, has a minimal impact on outcomes, and death is a black swan event. LEDVTsurveillance did not improve outcomes. Because PE was not associated with LEDVT and most patients with PE had no LEDVT, preventing, diagnosing, and treating LEDVT may be ineffective PE prophylaxis.

A Systematic Review of the Benefits and Risks of Anticoagulation Following Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the existing literature on benefits and risks of anticoagulant use after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

DESIGN

Systematic review. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Health Star, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) on October 11, 2012, and updated on September 2, 2013, using terms related to TBI and anticoagulants.

MAIN MEASURES

Human studies evaluating the effects of post-TBI anticoagulation on venous thromboembolism, hemorrhage, mortality, or coagulation parameters with original analyses were eligible for the review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline was followed throughout the conduct of the review.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine eligible studies were identified from the literature, of which 23 studies with complete information on post-TBI anticoagulant use and patient outcomes were summarized in this review. Meta-analysis was unwarranted because of varying methodological design and quality of the studies. Twenty-one studies focused on the effects of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (PTP) post-TBI on venous thromboembolism and/or progression of intracranial hemorrhage, whereas 2 randomized controlled trials analyzed coagulation parameters as the result of anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis appears to be safe among TBI patients with stabilized hemorrhagic patterns. More evidence is needed regarding effectiveness of PTP in preventing venous thromboembolism as well as preferred agent, dose, and timing for PTP.

Enoxaparin ameliorates post-traumatic brain injury edema and neurologic recovery, reducing cerebral leukocyte endothelial interactions and vessel permeability in vivo

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) confers a high risk of venous thrombosis, but early prevention with heparinoids is often withheld, fearing cerebral hematoma expansion. Yet, studies have shown heparinoids not only to be safe but also to limit brain edema and contusion size after TBI. Human TBI data also suggest faster radiologic and clinical neurologic recovery with earlier heparinoid administration. We hypothesized that enoxaparin (ENX) after TBI blunts in vivo leukocyte (LEU) mobilization to injured brain and cerebral edema, while improving neurologic recovery without increasing the size of the cerebral hemorrhagic contusion.

METHODS

CD1 male mice underwent either TBI by controlled cortical impact (CCI, 1-mm depth, 6 m/s) or sham craniotomy. ENX (1 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH, 0.9% saline, 1 mL/kg) was administered at 2, 8, 14, 23, and 32 hours after TBI. At 48 hours, intravital microscopy was used to visualize live LEUs interacting with endothelium and microvascular leakage of fluorescein isothiocyanate-albumin. Neurologic function (Neurological Severity Score, NSS), activated clotting time, hemorrhagic contusion size, as well as brain and lung wet-to-dry ratios were evaluated post mortem. Analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

Compared with VEH, ENX significantly reduced in vivo LEU rolling on endothelium (72.7 ± 28.3 LEU/100 μm/min vs. 30.6 ± 18.3 LEU/100 μm/min, p = 0.02) and cerebrovascular albumin leakage (34.5% ± 8.1% vs. 23.8% ± 5.5%, p = 0.047). CCI significantly increased ipsilateral cerebral hemisphere edema, but ENX treatment reduced post-CCI edema to near control levels (81.5% ± 1.5% vs. 77.6% ± 0.6%, p < 0.01). Compared with VEH, ENX reduced body weight loss at 24 hours (8.7% ± 1.2% vs. 5.8% ± 1.1%, p < 0.01) and improved NSS at 24 hours (14.5 ± 0.5 vs. 16.2 ± 0.4, p < 0.01) and 48 hours (15.1 ± 0.4 vs. 16.7 ± 0.5, p < 0.01) after injury. There were no significant differences in activated clotting time, hemorrhagic contusion size, and lung water content between the groups.

CONCLUSION

ENX reduces LEU recruitment to injured brain, diminishing visible microvascular permeability and edema. ENX may also accelerate neurologic recovery without increasing cerebral contusion size. Further study in humans is necessary to determine safety, appropriate dosage, and timing of ENX administration early after TBI.

Timing for deep vein thrombosis chemoprophylaxis in traumatic brain injury: an evidence-based review

Multiple studies have addressed deep vein thrombosis chemoprophylaxis timing in traumatic brain injuries. However, a precise time for safe and effective chemoprophylaxis is uncertain according to experts. A comprehensive literature review on brain injuries was performed to delineate temporal proportions for 1) spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression, 2) post-chemoprophylaxis ICH expansion, and 3) post-chemoprophylaxis deep vein thrombosis. Twenty-three publications were found including more than 5,000 patients. Spontaneous ICH expansion at 24 hours was 14.8% in 1,437 patients from chemoprophylaxis studies and 29.9% in 1,257 patients not in chemoprophylaxis studies (P < 0.0001). With low-risk ICH (n = 136), 99% of spontaneous ICH expansion occurred within 48 hours. In moderate or high-risk ICH (n = 109), 18% of spontaneous ICH expansion occurred after day 3. If patients with pre-chemoprophylaxis ICH expansion are included, the post-chemoprophylaxis ICH expansion proportion was 5.6% in 1,258 patients with chemoprophylaxis on days 1 to 3 and was 1.5% in 401 with chemoprophylaxis after day 3 (P = 0.0116). If patients with pre-chemoprophylaxis ICH expansion were excluded, the post-chemoprophylaxis ICH expansion proportion was 3.1% in 1,570 patients with chemoprophylaxis on days 1 to 3 and was 2.8% in 582 with chemoprophylaxis after day 3 (P = 0.7769). In diffuse axonal injury (n = 188), the post-chemoprophylaxis ICH expansion proportion was 1.6% with chemoprophylaxis after day 3. The deep vein thrombosis proportions were as follows: chemoprophylaxis on days 1 to 3, 2.6% in 2,384 patients; chemoprophylaxis on days 4 or 5, 2.2% in 831; and chemoprophylaxis on day 8, 14.1% in 99 (P < 0.0001). Spontaneous ICH expansion proportions at 24 hours substantially vary between chemoprophylaxis and non-chemoprophylaxis studies. Chemoprophylaxis should not be given within 3 days of injury for moderate-risk or high-risk ICH. Chemoprophylaxis is reasonable when low-risk patients have not developed ICH expansion within 48 hours post-injury. Chemoprophylaxis is also acceptable after day 3, when low-risk patients develop ICH expansion within 48 hours post-injury. In diffuse axonal injury patients who have not developed ICH within 72 hours, chemoprophylaxis is reasonable. Deep vein thrombosis proportions significantly increase when chemoprophylaxis is withheld for greater than 7 days.

Early initiation of prophylactic heparin in severe traumatic brain injury is associated with accelerated improvement on brain imaging

Background:

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis (VTEp) is often delayed following traumatic brain injury (TBI), yet animal data suggest that it may reduce cerebral inflammation and improve cognitive recovery. We hypothesized that earlier VTEp initiation in severe TBI patients would result in more rapid neurologic recovery and reduced progression of brain injury on radiologic imaging.

Study Design:

Medical charts of severe TBI patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center in 2009-2010 were queried for admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), head Abbreviated Injury Scale, Injury Severity Score (ISS), osmotherapy use, emergency neurosurgery, and delay to VTEp initiation. Progression (+1 = better, 0 = no change, −1 = worse) of brain injury on head CTs and neurologic exam (by bedside MD, nurse) was collected from patient charts. Head CT scan Marshall scores were calculated from the initial head CT results.

Results:

A total of 22, 34, and 19 patients received VTEp at early (<3 days), intermediate (3-5 days), and late (>5 days) time intervals, respectively. Clinical and radiologic brain injury characteristics on admission were similar among the three groups (P > 0.05), but ISS was greatest in the early group (P < 0.05). Initial head CT Marshall scores were similar in early and late groups. The slowest progression of brain injury on repeated head CT scans was in the early VTEp group up to 10 days after admission.

Conclusion:

Early initiation of prophylactic heparin in severe TBI is not associated with deterioration neurologic exam and may result in less progression of injury on brain imaging. Possible neuroprotective effects of heparin in humans need further investigation.

Thromboprophylaxis and VTE rates in soldiers wounded in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom

OBJECTIVES

US soldiers suffer catastrophic injuries during combat. We sought to define risk factors and rates for VTE in this population.

METHODS

We gathered data each hospital day on all patients injured in Afghanistan or Iraq who were admitted to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC). We analyzed prophylaxis rates and efficacy and identified risk factors for VTE.

RESULTS

We recorded data on 506 combat casualties directly admitted to WRAMC after medical air evacuation. The average injury severity score for the group was 18.4 ± 11.7, and the most common reason for air evacuation was injury by improvised explosive device (65%). As part of the initial resuscitation, patients received 4.7 ± 9.0 and 4.00 ± 7.8 units of packed RBCs and fresh frozen plasma, respectively, and 42 patients received factor VIIa. Forty-six patients (9.1%) were given a diagnosis of VTE prior to discharge, 18 (3.6%) during air evacuation, and 28 (5.5%) during the hospital stay. In Cox regression analysis, administration of 1 unit of packed RBCs was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02-1.07; P = .002), and enoxaparin, 30 mg bid, administered subcutaneously for the majority of hospital days was associated with a HR of 0.31 (95% CI, 0.11-0.86; P = .02) for VTE during the hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who suffer traumatic injuries in combat overseas are at high risk for VTE during evacuation and recovery. Those with large resuscitations are at particularly high risk, and low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with a decrease in VTE.

Safety and efficacy of early thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis after intracranial hemorrhage from traumatic brain injury

OBJECT

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at risk for development of thromboembolic disease. The use of chemoprophylaxis in this patient group has not fully been characterized. The authors hypothesize that early chemoprophylaxis in patients with TBI is safe and efficacious.

METHODS

In May 2009, a protocol was instituted for patients with TBI where chemoprophylaxis for thromboembolic disease (either 30 mg of Lovenox twice daily or 5000 U of heparin 3 times a day) was initiated 24 hours after an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was demonstrated as stable on head CT image. Two cohorts were evaluated: Cohort A included patients from May 2008 through April 2009 who had no routine administration of chemoprophylaxis, and Cohort B included patients from May 2009 through May 2010 after the protocol was instituted. The groups were compared, with the major outcomes being deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and increase in size of ICH.

RESULTS

Of the 312 patients with TBI who were seen during the study course, 236 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study: 107 patients in Cohort A and 129 patients in Cohort B. The DVT rate was 6 occurrences (5.61%) in Cohort A and 0 occurrences (0%) in Cohort B, which was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0080). Pulmonary embolism was found in 4 patients (3.74%) in Cohort A and 1 patient (0.78%) in Cohort B, a difference that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.18). Three instances (2.8%) in Cohort A and 1 instance (0.7%) in Cohort B of increased ICH occurred after starting anticoagulation for chemoprophylaxis; this was not statistically different (p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of chemoprophylaxis in TBI 24 hours after stable head CT is safe and decreases the rate of DVT formation.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

Objective: There is considerable practice variation and clinical uncertainty about the choice of prophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism in patients with traumatic brain injury. We performed a systematic review to assess both the effectiveness and safety of pharmacologic and mechanical prophylaxis, and the optimal time to initiate pharmacologic prophylaxis in hospitalized patients with traumatic brain injury.

Data sources and study selection: MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, SCOPUS, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, clinicaltrial.gov, and the Cochrane Library were searched in July 2012 to identify randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting on the effectiveness or safety of venous thromboembolism prevention in traumatic brain injury patients.

Data extraction: Paired reviewers extracted detailed information from included articles on standardized forms and assessed the risk of bias in each article.

Data synthesis: Twelve studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 10 cohort studies) evaluated the effectiveness and safety of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury. Five of the included studies assessed the optimal timing of initiation of pharmacological prophylaxis. Low grade evidence supports the effectiveness of enoxaparin over control in reducing deep vein thrombosis. Low grade evidence also supports the safety of unfractionated heparin over control in reducing mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury. Evidence was insufficient for remaining comparisons and outcomes including the optimal timing of initiation of pharmacoprophylaxis.

Conclusion: There is some evidence that pharmacoprophylaxis improves deep vein thromboses and mortality outcomes in patients hospitalized with traumatic brain injury. Additional studies are required to strengthen this evidence base.

Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury: a critical literature review

Despite the frequency and morbidity of venous thromboembolism (VTE) development after traumatic brain injury (TBI), no national standard of care exists to guide TBI caregivers for the use of prophylactic anticoagulation. Fears of iatrogenic propagation of intracranial hemorrhage patterns have led to a dearth of research in this field, and it is only relatively recently that studies dedicated to this question have been performed. These have generally been limited to retrospective and/or observational studies in which patients are classified in a binary fashion as having the presence or absence of intracranial blood. This methodology does not account for the fact that smaller injury patterns stabilize more rapidly, and thus may be able to safely tolerate earlier initiation of prophylactic anticoagulation than larger injury patterns. This review seeks to critically assess the literature on this question by examining the existing evidence on the safety and efficacy of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in the setting of elective craniotomy (as this is the closest model available from which to extrapolate) and after TBI. In doing so, we critique studies that approach TBI as a homogenous or a heterogenous study population. Finally, we propose our own theoretical protocol which stratifies patients into low, moderate, and high risk for the likelihood of natural progression of their hemorrhage pattern, and which allows one to tailor a unique VTE prophylaxis regimen to each individual arm.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in critically ill trauma patients who cannot receive chemical prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Standard venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention for critically ill trauma patients includes sequential compression devices and chemical prophylaxis. When contraindications to anticoagulation are present, prophylactic inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) may be used to prevent pulmonary emboli (PE) in high-risk patients, but specific indications are lacking. We sought to identify independent predictors of VTE in critically-ill trauma patients who cannot receive chemical prophylaxis in order to identify a subset of patients who may benefit from aggressive screening and/or prophylactic IVCF placement.

METHODS

All trauma patients in the surgical ICU from 2008 to 2009 were prospectively followed. Patients with an ICU length of stay ≥2 days who had contraindications to prophylactic anticoagulation were included. Screening duplex exams were obtained within 48 h of admission and then weekly. CT-angiography for PE was obtained if clinically indicated. Patients were excluded if they did not receive a duplex or if they had a post-injury VTE prior to ICU admission. Data regarding VTE rates (lower extremity [LE] DVT or PE), demographics, past medical history (PMH), injuries, and surgeries were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of VTE with a p<0.05.

RESULTS

411 trauma patients with a mean age of 48 (SD 22) years and 8 (SD 9) ICU days were included. 72% were male and the mean ISS was 22 (SD 13). 30 (7.3%) patients developed VTE: 28 (6.8%) with LEDVT and 2 (0.5%) with PE. Risk factors for VTE with a p<0.2 on univariate analysis included: PMH of DVT, injury severity score (ISS), extremity fractures (Fx), and a pelvis or LE extremity Fx repair. After logistic regression, only PMH of DVT (OR=22.6) and any extremity Fx (OR=2.4) remained as independent predictors.

CONCLUSION

VTE occur in 7% of critically injured trauma patients who cannot receive chemical prophylaxis. Aggressive screening and/or prophylactic IVCF placement may be considered in patients with a PMH of DVT or extremity fractures when anticoagulation is prohibited.

Prophylaxis for venous thrombo-embolism in neurocritical care: a critical appraisal

Venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) is frequently encountered in critically ill neurological and neurosurgical patients admitted to intensive care units. This patient population includes those with brain neoplasm, intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, pre- and post-operative patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures and those with traumatic brain injury, and acute spinal cord injury (SCI). There is a wide variability in clinical practice for thromboprophylaxis in these patients, in part due to paucity of data based on randomized clinical trials. Here, we review the current literature on the incidence of VTE in the critically ill neurological and neurosurgical patients as well as appraise available data to support particular practice paradigms for specific subsets of these patients. Data synthesis was conducted via search of Medline, Cochrane databases, and manual review of article bibliographies. Critically ill neurological and neurosurgical patients have higher susceptibility to VTE. Intermittent compression devices with or without anti-thrombotics is generally the method of choice for thromboprophylaxis. Low molecular weight heparin is the method of choice in certain patient subgroups such as those with SCI and ischemic stroke. Inferior vena cava filters may play a role in thromboprophylaxis in selected cases. Without clear guidelines that can be universally applied to this diverse group of patients, prophylaxis for VTE should be tailored to the individual patient with cautious assessment of benefits versus risks. There is a need for higher level evidence to guide VTE prophylaxis in certain subgroups of this patient population.

Guidelines for prevention of venous thromboembolism in immobile patients secondary to neurological impairment

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients and 7% of these cases are due to immobility secondary to a neurological impairment. Many guidelines are available to guide clinicians dealing with medical or surgical patients. However, and with the exception of spinal injuries, no guidelines are available to deal with other neurologically impaired patients at risk of VTE.

AIM

Our study aimed at gathering evidence from the literature to enable us to deal with the main controversial issues of VTE prevention. Guidelines will be formulated.

METHOD

A Clinical Standards Group is responsible for the development of clinical guidelines for the Greater Manchester Neurorehabilitation network with services covering a population of around 3 million. The development of VTE prevention guidelines started with the formulation of the main questions, then gathering evidence from the literature to address these questions. Wide consultation then took place. The guidelines were then put before the group for endorsement.

RESULTS

Answers for the main questions such as duration of thromboprophylaxis, TEDS and antiplatelets drugs use were suggested. The resulting document was summarized as a flow chart for use.

CONCLUSION

We feel that the proposed guidelines are a useful tool for clinicians as they reflect the evidence available from the literature at the moment.

Thromboembolic Prophylaxis in Blunt Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Review

There are few data in the literature on venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis for the traumatic population with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We reviewed our institutional experience and compared the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with ICH receiving either early prophylaxis (<72 hours from admission) or late prophylaxis (>72 hours from admission), and the respective incidences in progression of intracranial hemorrhage. We identified 124 patients for this study. There were 29 patients (23%) who received early (<72 hours) pharmacological VTE prophylaxis and 53 patients (43%) received late (>72 hours) prophylaxis. In the study, 42 patients had intermittent pneumatic compression devices and received no pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. Among those with pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, 10 patients (8%) developed VTE (9 deep vein thrombosis and 1 pulmonary embolism). Three patients with pharmacological VTE prophylaxis developed ICH progression, with one being clinically significant. Our institutional review demonstrated that it seems safe to initiate early pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in blunt head trauma with stable ICH. Nevertheless, further prospective randomized studies are needed to fully elucidate the safety and efficacy in the timing of prophylaxis for blunt head trauma with ICH.

Four years of an aggressive prophylaxis and screening protocol for venous thromboembolism in a large trauma population

BACKGROUND

This retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was conducted to analyze the efficacy of 4 years of aggressive prophylaxis and screening protocols for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a large population of trauma patients.

METHODS

Trauma patients at a Level I Trauma Center found to be nonambulatory or otherwise high risk were placed on a protocol of lower-extremity (LE) compression devices and subcutaneous enoxaparin as soon as feasible after admission. Duplex scans of LEs were conducted weekly.

RESULTS

During 4 years, 2,939 patients were admitted to trauma with length of stay >2 days. There was a 3.2% incidence of VTE in the length of stay >2 days population, 2.5% rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and 0.7% pulmonary embolism. All VTE patients had factors known to increase risk of VTE and were included in our prophylaxis and screening protocol. Twenty-one percent of these received pharmacologic prophylaxis within the first 2 days of admission; 62% received enoxaparin at some point before diagnosis of VTE. Duplex scans were conducted in 982 patients. Notably, 86% of LE DVTs were found on routine screening duplex.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest population of trauma patients followed by screening duplexes. All patients with VTEs were identified as high risk, and screening revealed multiple patients with an asymptomatic DVT. We conclude our aggressive prophylaxis regimen lead to low rates of VTE and think screening duplex is a critical component for identifying unsuspected DVT.

The impact of preinjury antiplatelet and anticoagulant pharmacotherapy on outcomes in elderly patients with hemorrhagic brain injury

BACKGROUND

More elderly trauma patients are identified with preinjury use of clopidogrel, aspirin, or warfarin (CAW). The purpose of this study was to determine whether preinjury CAW use was an important predictor of mortality in patients aged >or=50 years with blunt, hemorrhagic brain injury (HBI).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with blunt, HBI aged >or=50 years with subgroup analysis for older (>70 years) and younger (50-70 years) patients was performed. CAW use was analyzed for differences in age, gender, hospital length of stay (LOS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), mechanism of injury (MOI), platelet transfusion therapy (PLT), disposition at discharge, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

From January 2003 to October 2005, 416 patients were identified. The mean age was 69+/-1 years. No differences were found for ISS (24 +/- 0.5), GCS (12 +/- 0.2), or LOS (8 +/- 0.4 days). CAW use was present in 40% of patients and significantly higher in older patients. Mortality was not different between older and younger CAW(+) patients, but it significantly increased for older CAW(-) patients. Significant predictors of death included age, ISS, and GCS (P<.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Preinjury CAW use in older blunt, HBI patients is not associated with increased mortality. Age was a significant predictor of mortality independent of CAW use.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with acute stroke and traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with acute stroke and traumatic brain injury are at risk to develop venous thromboembolism. This review analyzes the available literature to propose guidelines for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in these groups of patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

In acute ischemic stroke, low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin has the best benefit-risk ratio to prevent venous thromboembolism. Patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage and traumatic brain injury should receive intermittent pneumatic compression, followed by low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractioned heparin 3-4 days after stroke onset or 24 h after injury or surgery, respectively, and after cessation of bleeding. Concerning treatment, in patients with deep-vein thrombosis lower doses of heparin are indicated to prevent pulmonary embolism, and a vena cava filter should be considered. In patients with pulmonary embolism, treatment could be more aggressive, because of a high mortality risk.

SUMMARY

Adequate prevention of venous thromboembolism with intermittent pneumatic compression or pharmacological prophylaxis is important. The best treatment of venous thromboembolism remains unclear. In case of pulmonary embolism, more aggressive treatment is warranted.

Remote cerebellar hemorrhage and iliofemoral vein thrombosis after supratentorial craniotomy

INTRODUCTION

Cerebellar hemorrhage following supratentorial craniotomy is rare. Its clinical symptoms are often mild and transient.

DISCUSSION

Here, we report a case of cerebellar hemorrhage associated with iliofemoral vein thrombosis as a complication of anterior temporal lobectomy and amygdalohippocampectomy for refractory medial temporal epilepsy.