The costs of a suburban paramedic program in reducing deaths due to cardiac arrest

Economic value of out-of-hospital emergency care: a structured literature review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The evaluation of the impact of out-of-hospital emergency care is a relatively new research focus. As such, there is a compelling need to determine how finite health care resources should be used in this setting. The objective of this study is to conduct a structured review of published economic evaluations of out-of-hospital emergency care to assess its economic value.

METHODS

A structured literature search and structured review of articles pertaining to the economic value of out-of-hospital care was performed. The bibliographic database MEDLINE was searched for pertinent English-language articles published between 1966 and 2003. The search used the medical subject headings "emergency medical services" and "emergency medical technician" and was limited to the subheading "economics" and crossed with the medical subject heading "economics." The titles generated by this search were systematically reviewed and limited by topic. Abstracts from the identified titles were reviewed to select a final set of pertinent articles. These articles were further limited based on explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Authors used a previously published structured evaluation tool to review the final set of identified articles for quality and content.

RESULTS

The initial MEDLINE search identified 3,533 citations. From this set, 535 potentially relevant abstracts were reviewed. From the abstract review, 46 articles were identified, along with an additional 14 from searching the secondary references. Of these 60 articles, 32 met the review inclusion criteria and were subjected to a full structured review. These studies predominantly addressed the cost of cardiac arrest (n=13, 41%), major trauma (n=8, 25%), and emergency medical services treatment in general (n=8, 25%). Only 14 studies considered the costs and consequences of competing alternatives. Of these, 2 were cost-benefit and 12 were cost-effectiveness evaluations. Two of the 14 studies met all 10 criteria for high-quality economic evaluation, whereas 2 others met none.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of out-of-hospital care literature that addresses cost and economic value. The extant literature is limited in scope, poor in quality, and evaluates small subsets of out-of-hospital emergency care costs. Favorable cost-effectiveness has not been firmly established for most aspects of out-of-hospital emergency care.

Modeling an emergency medical services system using computer simulation

STUDY OBJECTIVES

In the emergency medical services (EMS) system, appropriate prehospital care can substantially decrease casualty mortality and morbidity. This study designed a simulation model, evaluated the existing EMS system, and suggested improvements.

METHODS

The study focused on 23 networked EMS hospitals affiliated with 36 emergency response units (subgroups) to perform two-tier rescues (advanced life support [ALS] in addition to basic life support [BLS] services) in Taipei, Taiwan. Using the existing EMS model as a base, this research constructed a computer simulation model and explored several model alternatives to achieve the study's objectives. The virtual models varied with staffing level, number of assigned emergency network hospitals, and various two-tier rescue probabilities.

RESULTS

Increasing the staffing to two teams for Hospital 22 lessened the call waiting probability (delay between rescue call and ambulance dispatch) by 50%, even if the dispatch rate of the two-tier rescue increased from the empirical 2% to a simulated 10 and 20%. Changing the two-tier rescue pattern so each EMS subgroup cooperated with two specific, preassigned network hospitals lowered the probability of patients having to wait for rescue dispatch to under 1%.

CONCLUSION

The following alternatives provided the greatest combination of effectiveness, quality patient care, and cost-efficiency: (1) because of its unique location, increase Hospital 22's staffing level to two ALS teams. (2) Establish a specific rescue protocol for the two-tier system that preassigns two network hospitals to each of the 36 EMS subgroups along with a prearranged calling sequence. If implemented, this will improve EMS performance, streamline the system, reduce randomness, and enhance efficiency.

Long term survival and costs per life year gained after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

PURPOSE

To study long-term survival and estimate the costs per year of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cardiac arrest patients treated by the physician-manned ambulance in Oslo from January 1971 to June 1992. The condition of the patient when discharged from hospital was noted and survival followed until June 2002. Costs of the Emergency Medical Service (EMS), hospital treatment, rehabilitation and nursing homes and psychiatric institutions after discharge from hospital were included in a cost-effectiveness analysis.

RESULTS

1300 (42%) of 3065 patients receiving ALS were admitted to hospital after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). 1066 of these patients had a cardiac cause of the arrest, full hospital report and were found in the National Registry. Median age was 68 years (60-74) and 802 (75%) were men. 269 of the 1066 patients were discharged from hospital alive, 239 to their homes and 30 patients to rehabilitation/nursing homes or psychiatric institutions. The mean survival of the 1066 patients was 532 days. They spent mean 3.4 days in a CCU, 6.8 days in a general ward and 11.2 days in nursing/rehabilitation homes or psychiatric institutions. 30 patients were discharged to rehabilitation/nursing homes or psychiatric institutions. The mean survival time for the 269 patients discharged from hospital alive was 6.13 years. 110 patients were alive after five and 61 after 10 years. The cost per patient discharged alive was 40,642 or 6,632 per life year gained.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac arrest patients do not occupy intensive care beds too long, and few end up in a vegetative state. Methodological differences in different studies makes meaningful comparisons of costs difficult, but the costs per life year saved are not high compared to other publications.

EMS ... agenda for the future

In 1996, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau published the EMS Agenda for the Future. To date, thousands of copies have been distributed to EMS-knowledgeable people, and those who aspire to be, throughout the United States. This article reviews the findings discussed within the EMS Agenda for the Future. This discussion also assesses the effects of these findings on EMS development.

Resource reallocation in an emergency medical service system using computer simulation

Emergency medical service (EMS) policy makers must seek to achieve maximum effectiveness with finite resources. This research establishes an EMS computer simulation model using eM-Plant software. The simulation model is based on Taipei city's EMS system with input data from prehospital care records from December 2000; it manipulates resource allocation levels and rates of idle errands. Presently, EMS ambulance utilization is about 8.78%. On average, 20.89 minutes are required to transport a patient to the hospital. Computer simulations showed that reducing the number of ambulances to one at each of the 36 response units increases the utilization rate to 15.47% but does not compromise the current service quality level. Thus, ambulance utilization improves, times of patients waiting for pre-hospital care and arrival at hospitals are only slightly affected, and considerable cost savings result. This study provides a research methodology and suggests specific policy directions for resource allocation in EMS. Limiting the number of ambulances to one per response unit reduces costs, increases efficiency, and yet maintains the same operational pattern of medical service.

Paramedics, technicians, and survival from out of hospital cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that limited paramedic advanced life support skills afford no advantage in survival from cardiac arrest when compared with non-paramedic ambulance crews equipped with defibrillators in an urban environment; and to investigate whether separate response units delayed on scene times.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was conducted over 17 consecutive months on all adult patients brought to the accident and emergency (A&E) department of Glasgow Royal Infirmary having suffered an out of hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology. The main interventions were bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and limited advance life support skills.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Return of spontaneous circulation, survival to admission, and discharge.

RESULTS

Of 240 patients brought to the A&E department, 19 had no clear record of whether a paramedic was or was not involved and so were excluded. There was no difference in survival between the two groups, although a trend to admission favoured non-paramedics. Paramedics spent much longer at the scene (P < 0.0001). Witnessed arrests (P = 0.01), early bystander CPR (P = 0.12), shockable rhythms (P = 0.003), and defibrillation (P < 0.0001) were associated with better survival. Intubation and at scene times were not associated with better survival. Delayed second response units did not prolong at scene times.

CONCLUSIONS

The interventions of greatest benefit in out of hospital cardiac arrest are basic life support and defibrillation. Additional skills are of questionable benefit and may detract from those of greatest benefit.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of potential improvements to emergency medical services for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To measure the incremental cost-effectiveness of various improvements to emergency medical services (EMS) systems aimed at increasing survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

METHODS

We performed cost-effectiveness analysis based on (1) metaanalysis of effectiveness of the various EMS systems, (2) costing of each component of EMS systems, (3) modeling of the relationship between the proportion of cardiac arrest victims who receive CPR and the proportion of individuals trained, (4) modeling of the relationship between response time interval and the characteristics of the EMS system, (5) measurement of quality of life, and (6) decision analysis to combine the results of the first five components.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for a 48-second improvement in mean response time in a one-tier EMS system yielded by the addition of more EMS providers was $368,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). For improved response time in a two-tier EMS system by the addition of more basic life support (BLS)/BLS-defibrillator (BLS-D) providers to the first tier, the ratio was $53,000 per QALY with pump vehicles or $159,000 per QALY with ambulances. Change from a one-tier EMS to a two-tier EMS system by the addition of initial BLS/BLS-D providers in pump vehicles as the first tier was associated with a cost per QALY of $40,000. Change from one-tier EMS to two-tier EMS by the addition of initial BLS/BLS-D providers in ambulances as the first tier was associated with a cost per QALY of $94,000.

CONCLUSION

The most attractive options in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness were improved response time in a two-tier EMS system or change from a one-tier to a two-tier EMS system. Future research should be directed toward identification of the costs of instituting the first tier of a two-tier EMS system and identification of cost-effective methods of improving response time.

EMT-defibrillation: the Wisconsin experience

The survival rate for patients with prehospital cardiac arrest has improved in some communities with early defibrillation by emergency medical technician-defibrillators (EMT-Ds). In rural areas, previous studies on survival with defibrillation by EMT-Ds have been variable. We conducted an EMT-D study to determine effectiveness in various prehospital settings. Sixty-four ambulance services from communities ranging in size from rural areas to city suburbs participated in our prospective study. EMTs were trained in rhythm recognition and the use of a manual defibrillator during a standardized 20-hour course. Over 18 months, data were collected locally for central analysis. Five hundred sixty-six patients with primary cardiac arrest were included in our study: 36 (6.4%) survived. Retrospective review revealed survival before EMT-D implementation to be 3.6% (P less than .02). Three hundred four patients (54%) had an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation, with 33 (11%) surviving. The survival rate for EMT-D-witnessed arrest with an initial rhythm of ventricular fibrillation was 42%. Patients with asystole were countershocked in our study; however, there were no survivors from this group. The neurologic status of survivors at time of hospital discharge was normal in 72%. The average response time, defined as time of emergency medical services activation to the time of EMT-D arrival, was 7.3 +/- 5.8 and 3.7 +/- 2.0 minutes for nonsurvivors and survivors, respectively (P less than .002). There were no survivors when the response time was more than eight minutes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cost-effectiveness of defibrillation by emergency medical technicians

Effective emergency systems using emergency medical technicians (EMTs) trained to defibrillate or paramedics can save more lives from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation than can emergency systems staffed with basic EMTs who cannot defibrillate. This article focuses on the cost-effectiveness of systems staffed with each type of EMT. Data were collected from all 50 states and from the District of Columbia to determine the number of hours and estimated cost of initial training for the three types of EMTs in the United States in 1986. The median initial training hours for basic EMTs, EMTs trained in defibrillation, and paramedics were 110, 129, and 700, respectively. Median costs for initial training at each EMT level were +123, +150, and +1580/student. According to published survival data for emergency medical systems staffed with EMTs at each level, the total initial training personnel and equipment cost per life saved from ventricular fibrillation was +7687, +2126, and +2289 for systems staffed by the respective EMTs. The initial cost per life saved from ventricular fibrillation is more than three times greater in systems staffed by basic EMTs than in systems staffed by EMTs trained in defibrillation or paramedics. From a medical and a cost-effective standpoint, all communities served by basic EMTs should consider upgrading them to at least the defibrillation-trained EMT level.

Cost of a saved life following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitated by specially trained ambulance personnel

During a 1-year-study period three emergency ambulances manned by specially trained emergency medical technicians (EMTs) were successful in the resuscitation of 28 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, who were admitted to hospital for further treatment. Nineteen patients died in hospital while nine were discharged to their homes, a survival rate corresponding to 3.5 saved lives per 100,000 inhabitants per year. The extra pre-hospital costs and the estimated costs for hospital treatment of the admitted patients amounted to 929,600 Swedish kronor (SEK). The program cost of the early defibrillation by trained EMTs accounted for only 12% of this amount, or 113,600 SEK. The cost of hospital treatment accounted for the remaining 88%, or 816,000 SEK. Intensive care accounted for 53% of the hospital costs, coronary care 4%, treatment in a general ward 33% and in a ward for rehabilitation or long-term care 10%. Non-survivors accounted for 58% of the hospital expenditure. The marginal prehospital cost (program cost) for each survivor was 12,622 SEK or approximately 1800 US dollars. The total cost per life saved was 103,000 SEK or approximately 14,700 US dollars. The estimated cost to each taxpayer of providing this extra emergency resource would be approximately 0.5 SEK a year.

Efficacy of an automated external defibrillator in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: validation of the diagnostic algorithm and initial clinical experience in a rural environment

Automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) may have advantages over manual defibrillation in managing prehospital cardiac arrest, particularly in rural communities. We conducted a two-part evaluation of a commercially available AED. We first established the diagnostic accuracy of the AED's rhythm recognition algorithm by challenging it with 205 cardiac arrest rhythms previously recorded from actual patients in the field. The AED demonstrated 100% specificity and 92% sensitivity for ventricular fibrillation (VF) in this nonclinical setting. We then compared the clinical efficacy of AEDs in 18 small communities (study group) with that of manual defibrillation in 18 additional communities (control group) of similar size. Ambulance technicians using manual defibrillators correctly diagnosed VF more frequently than the AEDs (98% vs 83%; p less than .025). Specificity for VF was similar in the two groups (100% for AEDs vs 94% for technicians; p greater than .10). AEDs were able to deliver shocks more quickly than was possible with the manual defibrillators (1.56 vs 2.77 min; p less than .001). The ability of the AEDs to terminate VF was excellent, converting VF in 28 of 29 (97%) patients to some other rhythm compared with only 37 of 53 (70%) patients in the control group (p less than .01). Hospital admission and discharge rates were similar for the two groups. Ten of the 35 (29%) patients managed with AEDs achieved admission and six (17%) were ultimately discharged. In the control group 17 of 53 (33%) patients with VF were admitted and seven (13%) were discharged (p less than .75). AEDs are an effective alternative to manual defibrillation in small communities.

Prehospital defibrillation performed by emergency medical technicians in rural communities

Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is poor in communities served only by basic ambulance services, but conventional advanced prehospital care is not an option for most rural communities. Ambulance technicians in 18 small communities (average population, 10,400) were trained to recognize and defibrillate ventricular fibrillation. Neither endotracheal intubation nor medication was used. Twelve additional communities of similar size where such early defibrillation was not attempted provided control data. In the communities where early defibrillation was available, 12 of 64 patients (19 per cent) who were found in ventricular fibrillation were resuscitated and discharged alive from the hospital; this was true of only 1 of 31 such patients (3 per cent) in the control communities, where only basic life support was available (P less than 0.05). Ten (83 per cent) of the long-term survivors received electrical shocks administered solely by the technicians. Early defibrillation by minimally trained ambulance technicians is an effective approach to emergency cardiac care in rural communities.

Prehospital care telemetry--how essential?

The telemeterized ECG, once a necessary and important part of prehospital care, may now be an unnecessary, expensive luxury. Paramedic training now produces a professional capable of diagnosing ECG rhythms as accurately as emergency physicians. ECG telemetry may, however, have utility for esprit de corps, training, evaluation, and supervision of new or less trained paramedics. Recommendations for establishing or renewing community telemetry systems are made.

Cost-benefit and cost-effective analysis in surgery

Cost-benefit analysis and cost-effective analysis are formal analytical methods to provide a rational, objective means of comparing total costs with total benefits or of comparing effects in the selection of competing programs for financial support. The use of these techniques in the medical field is a relatively recent development and can aid in future cost containment.