Preoperative expectations of pain and recovery in relation to postoperative disappointment in patients undergoing lumbar surgery

How Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Relate to Patient Expectations and Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Review

This narrative review seeks to enhance our comprehension of how Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) values in established Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for spine surgery correspond with patient preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction. Through our literature search, we found that both MCID and PASS serve as dependable indicators of patient expectations. However, MCID may be more susceptible to a floor effect. This implies that PASS may offer a more accurate reflection of how patients anticipate surgery to address their symptoms. Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognize that achieving MCID or PASS may not be an absolute prerequisite for patients to be satisfied with their treatment.

Recovery pattern after decompression of central lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Detailed preoperative information is associated with superior outcomes. We aimed to describe the recovery pattern after decompression of central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS).

METHODS

50 patients aged 51-85 years who underwent decompression without fusion due to CLSS were followed from before to after surgery (post-op day 1, 7, and 14). Back and leg pain were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 = no pain 0, 10 = worst pain) and quality of life using the EuroQol-5D index (0 = death, 1 = best), and EQ-5D-visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 = worst, 100 = best).

RESULTS

NRS leg pain was reduced from preoperative to first postoperative day by 5.2 (6.1, 4.3) (mean (95%CI)], and NRS back pain from postoperative day 1-7 by 0.6 (1.2, 0.03) and from day 7 to 14 by 0.7 (1.3, 0.2)]. In contrast, EQ-5D index increased from preoperative to first postoperative day by 0.09 (0.06, 0.13) and from day 1 to 7 by 0.05 (0.02,0.08), and EQ-5D VAS from preoperative to first postoperative day by 13.7 (9.1, 18.3) and from day 1 to 7 by 6.0 (2.0, 10.0). After two weeks, 51% of the patients had improved above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in back pain and 71% in leg pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients scheduled for decompression due to CLSS should be informed that improvement in leg pain and quality of life in general can be expected within one day of surgery, that quality of life improves a little further in the first postoperative week, and that back pain improves in the first 2 postoperative weeks. In most patients, decompression without fusion due to CLSS seems to achieve clinically relevant improvement within 2 weeks.

Associations between future health expectations and patient satisfaction after lumbar spine surgery: a longitudinal observational study of 9929 lumbar spine surgery procedures

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the associations between general health expectations and patient satisfaction with treatment for the two common spine surgery procedures diskectomy for lumbar disk herniation (LDH) and decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

DESIGN

Register study with prospectively collected preoperative and 1-year postoperative data.

SETTING

National outcome data from Swespine, the national Swedish spine register.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 9929 patients, aged between 20 and 85 years, who were self-reported non-smokers, and were operated between 2007 and 2016 for one-level LSS without degenerative spondylolisthesis, or one-level LDH, were identified in the national Swedish spine register (Swespine). We used SF-36 items 11c and 11d to assess future health expectations and present health perceptions. Satisfaction with treatment was assessed using the Swespine satisfaction item.

INTERVENTIONS

One-level diskectomy for LDH or one-level decompression for LSS.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Satisfaction with treatment.

RESULTS

For LSS, the year 1 satisfaction ratio among patients with negative future health expectations preoperatively was 60% (95% CI 58% to 63%), while it was 75% (95% CI 73% to 76%) for patients with positive future health expectations preoperatively. The corresponding numbers for LDH were 73% (95% CI 71% to 75%) and 84% (95% CI 83% to 85%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients operated for the common lumbar spine diseases LSS or LDH, with negative future general health expectations, were significantly less satisfied with treatment than patients with positive expectations with regard to future general health. These findings are important for patients, and for the surgeons who counsel them, when surgery is a treatment option for LSS or LDH.

Patient's expectations of surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: analysis by type of surgery and patient factors from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN)

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preoperative expectations influence postoperative outcomes. Patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis have especially high expectations of pain relief and overall functional well-being compared to patients with lumbar stenosis.

PURPOSE

The primary objective was to analyze preoperative expectations of lumbar DS patients with respect to the type of surgery proposed (decompression vs decompression and fusion). Secondarily, we aimed to assess the associations between preoperative expectations and patient and clinical factors as well as postoperative expectations fulfillment.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Patients were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter, prospective cohort study evaluating the assessment and management of degenerative spondylolisthesis utilizing the infrastructure of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) surgical registry.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with a diagnosis of degenerative spondylolisthesis with symptoms of neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy with or without back pain, unresponsive to nonoperative management over at least 3 months were included. Patients who underwent decompression, decompression and posterolateral fusion or decompression and interbody fusion at Canadian spine centers between January 2015 and September 2021 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Questionnaire was utilized for expectations measurement. The expectation questionnaire was completed following consent and before surgery and at 1 year.

METHODS

Expectations for pain relief and improvements in overall functional well-being were rated on a scale of 0 to 100. Preoperative expectation in terms of pain relief and functional well-being score were calculated. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the association between expected preoperative patient factors and pain relief and functional well-being. The factors associated with the most important expectation were evaluated using multivariable multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-two patients were included with 100 patients undergoing decompression and 252 patients also undergoing fusion. The seven items of preoperative expectations did not differ between the procedure groups nor did expected change. The mean pain relief and overall functional well-being expectation scores did not significantly differ between procedures. Higher expectations were associated with having more comorbidities [β=-2.0 (SE 0.8), p=.020], being physically active [β=8.4 (SE 3.2), p=.010] and having more leg pain [β=1.6 (SE 0.7), p=.015]. Better perceived physical health measured by SF12 PCS was associated with lower expectation of pain relief [β= -0.4 (SE 0.2), p=.039] and functional well-being [β=-0.84 (SE 0.2), p=.001]. Better perceived mental health measured by SF12 MCS was associated with lower expectation of functional well-being [β=-0.8 (SE 0.2), p=.001]. Postoperative expectations fulfillment did not differ between procedures.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative expectations in terms of pain relief and functional well-being were similar between the two most common procedures performed, decompression ± fusion. Secondarily, higher preoperative expectations were associated with greater pain, disability and being physically active. Expectations fulfillment did not differ between procedures.

Immediate patient perceptions following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: semi-structured multi-centre interviews exploring the patient journey and experiences of lumbar fusion surgery (FuJourn)

PURPOSE

To understand the patient journey to Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery (LSFS) and patients' experiences of surgery.

METHODS

Qualitative study using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Adult participants following LSFS were recruited from 4 UK clinical sites using purposive sampling to ensure representation of key features (e.g. age). Semi-structured interviews informed by a piloted topic guide developed from the literature were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis for individual interviews and then across participants (deductive and inductive) identified emerging themes. Trustworthiness of data analyses was enhanced using multiple strategies (e.g. attention to negative cases).

RESULTS

Four emerging themes from n = 31 patients' narratives were identified: decision for surgery, coping strategies, barriers to recovery and recovery after surgery. Decision for surgery and recovery after surgery themes are distinguished by the point of surgery. However, barriers to recovery and coping strategies are key to the whole patient journey encompassing long journeys to surgery and their initial journey after surgery. The themes of coping strategies and barriers to recovery were inter-related and perceived by participants as parallel concepts. The 4 multifactorial themes interacted with each other and shaped the process of an individual patient's recovery. Factors such as sporadic interventions prior to surgery, time-consuming wait for diagnosis and surgery and lack of information regarding recovery strongly influenced perceptions of outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patient driven data enables insights to inform research regarding surgery/rehabilitation through depth of understanding of the patient journey. Awareness of factors important to patients is important; ensuring that patient-driven data informs research and patient care.

The Relation of Patient Expectations, Satisfaction, and Outcome in Surgery of the Cervical Spine: A Prospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a prospective nonblinded single center observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between expectations, outcome, and satisfaction with the outcome in patients undergoing cervical spine stabilization surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In modern healthcare, patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction have become an important aspect of quality control. Therefore, outcome benchmarks for specific diseases are highly desired. Numerous studies have investigated patient-reported outcome measures and what constitutes satisfaction in degenerative lumbar spine disease. In cervical spine surgery, it is less clear what drives the postoperative symptom burden and patient satisfaction and how this depends on the primary diagnosis and other patient factors.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single center, observational study on patients undergoing cervical spine stabilization surgery for degenerative disease, trauma, infection, or tumor. Using the visual analogue scale for neck and arm pain, the neck disability index (NDI), the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (mJOA) and patient-reported satisfaction, patient status and expectations before surgery, at discharge, 6 and 12 months after surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred five patients were included. Score-based outcome correlated well with satisfaction at 6 and 12 months. Except for low NDI expectations (≥15 points) that correlated with dissatisfaction, expectations in no other score were correlated with satisfaction. Expectations did influence the outcome in some subgroups and meeting expectations resulted in higher rates of satisfaction. Pain reduction plays an important role for satisfaction, independently from the predominant symptom or pathology.

CONCLUSION

Satisfaction correlates well with outcome. Meeting expectations did influence satisfaction with the outcome. The NDI seems to be a valuable preoperative screening tool for poor satisfaction at 12 months. In degenerative pathology, pain is the predominant variable influencing satisfaction independently from the predominant symptom (including myelopathy).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

ThyroidEx: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Thyroid Surgery Expectations Measure

OBJECTIVE

To address the lack of validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments that define and quantify patient expectations in thyroid cancer surgery, we developed and initially validated ThyroidEx, a novel disease-specific PRO instrument.

STUDY DESIGN

Survey study.

SETTING

Single-institution tertiary care cancer center.

METHODS

An expert panel drafted an initial set of thyroid cancer-specific concepts, which was used in semistructured concept elicitation interviews with patients with thyroid cancer 4 weeks before and 8 weeks after surgery. Candidate items were generated per patient responses and refined via cognitive interviewing and additional review by the expert panel. The draft ThyroidEx was then preoperatively administered to a separate cohort undergoing thyroid cancer surgery to establish a final item set and initial psychometric evidence.

RESULTS

Prospective concept elicitation interviews generated 358 patient-elicited concepts (n = 15 patients). These were then placed into 70 unique subcategories from which 41 items were generated for cognitive interviews with 20 patients preoperatively and 28 postoperatively. After expert panel review, ThyroidEx included 18 items across 2 scales (Expectations and Concerns), with an additional item about beliefs. In the preoperative cohort in phase 2 (n = 67), internal consistency Cronbach's α values ranged from 0.81 to 0.89. Descriptive analysis showed significant differences between patients' concerns and expectations and clinicians' perceptions.

CONCLUSION

Defining expectations represents an important modifier in the measurement of PROs. Preliminary validation of ThyroidEx revealed incongruent expectations between expert opinion and patients. Future development and implementation of ThyroidEx may affect preoperative consultation and the consent process.

Patient-Reported Expectations, Outcome and Satisfaction in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Stabilization Surgery: A Prospective Study

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become an important aspect of quality control in modern healthcare. In this prospective observational study on 199 patients undergoing thoracolumbar stabilization surgery, we quantified preoperative expectations and PROMs at six and twelve months after surgery, and we investigated what constitutes patient satisfaction with the outcome. We used the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Preoperative expectations were high (expected ODI: 9 ± 13%; leg pain: 1.0 ± 1.4; back pain: 1.3 ± 1.5). Pain and disability improved substantially, but expectations were mostly unrealistic (ODI expectation fulfilled after six months: 28% of patients; back pain: 48%). However, satisfaction was high (70% at six months after surgery). Satisfied patients had significantly better pain and disability outcomes and higher rates of expectation fulfillment than non-satisfied patients. Patients undergoing revision stabilization had worse outcomes than all other diagnosis groups. Prior stabilization surgery was identified as an independent risk factor for dissatisfaction. There were no preoperative pain or disability levels that predicted dissatisfaction. The data presented in this study can provide benchmarks for diagnosis-specific PROM targets in thoracolumbar stabilization surgery. Future studies should investigate whether satisfaction can be influenced, e.g., by discussing realistic outcome targets with patients ahead of surgery.

Patients' expectations of spine surgery for degenerative conditions: results from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN)

BACKGROUND

Understanding patient expectations is a critical component of patient-centered care; however, little is known about which expectation(s) are most important to patients as they relate to their sense of postoperative success.

PURPOSE

To investigate patient's preoperative expectations of change in symptoms, function, and well-being resulting from surgical intervention and to examine the associations between sociodemographic, lifestyle, health status, and clinical characteristics with patient outcome expectations STUDY DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study.

SAMPLE

Preoperative data from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network national registry of patients of patients (n=4,333) undergoing surgery for degenerative spinal conditions between 2012 and 2017.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients reported their expectations as a result of the surgery (0 [no change], 1 [somewhat better], 2 [better] or 3 [much better]) for seven items: leg/arm pain, back/neck pain, independence in everyday activities, sporting activities/recreation, general physical capacity, frequency and quality of social contacts, and mental well-being. Patients also reported the single most important change expected.

METHODS

Data on demographic, lifestyles, health status, clinical factors, and reasons for having surgery were also collected. Factor analysis was used to examine the multidimensionality of expectations. Multivariate linear regression was used to examine factors associated with expectations.

RESULTS

Over 80% of patients reported expectation for improvements (at least somewhat better) in all items with the exception of social contacts (75.8%). Expectations are multidimensional; a two factor structure emerged indicating two expectation dimensions (pain relief and overall functional well-being). Two expectation scores were calculated corresponding to the two dimensions (0-100), with higher scores reflecting higher expectations. The mean±standard deviation pain relief expectation score was 78.5±24.7 and the mean overall functional well-being expectation score was 69.7±24.4. In multivariate analysis, the variables associated with these dimensions either differed or differed in degree of influence. For example, higher pain and disability scores, thoracolumbar location and diagnosis of spondylolisthesis were associated with higher expectations in both dimensions, while longer disease duration was only associated with lower overall functional well-being expectations. The top three most important expected change items were pain (improvement of leg or arm pain (29.1%)/improvement in back/neck pain (26.0%)), improvement in general capacity/function (21.0%), and improvement of independence in everyday activities (15.9%). Rankings of the most important expected change were similar across sociodemographic, lifestyle, health status, and clinical variables examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the need to identify and address specific individual expectations as part of the shared decision-making and presurgery education process.

Patient Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Patient satisfaction reflects the patients' perception of the outcome of care and is being considered for use in future reimbursement schemes. No consensus exists regarding the best instrument to measure patient satisfaction in the field of spine surgery. This systematic review aimed to determine how patient satisfaction for spine surgery has been measured previously and whether a disease-specific, comprehensive instrument to measure patient satisfaction has been established; we also aimed to define the dimensions of care that determine patient satisfaction in spine surgery. A systematic search of three online databases, unpublished sources, and citations was undertaken to identify 156 empirical studies that reported on patient satisfaction in the field of spine surgery. Manuscripts were reviewed in terms of the patient satisfaction instrument used, and the instruments were categorized as per content and method axes. Taxonomy of patient satisfaction with spine surgery identified the major characteristics of providers and medical care that influenced patient satisfaction and acted as a structure to categorically define the dimensions of patient satisfaction in spine surgery. The reviewed studies predominantly used global (108/156) rather than multidimensional (46/156), instruments. Most studies (96.2%) reported satisfaction with outcome rather than with care, and only 18.5% of the studies (29/156) utilized a disease-specific instrument. The following seven dimensions of patient status, outcome, and care experience that affected patient satisfaction were identified: pain, function, patient expectations/preference, specific patient health characteristics, caregiver interpersonal manner, efficacy/clinical outcomes, and postoperative care/therapy. Currently, no disease-specific instrument that includes all dimensions of patient satisfaction in spine surgery has been developed. Such a patient satisfaction instrument should be designed, tested for reliability and validity, and widely implemented.

Postoperative satisfaction following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: patient expectation versus actuality

OBJECTIVE

Due to the reported benefits associated with minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS), patients seeking out minimally invasive surgery may have higher expectations regarding their outcomes. In this study the authors aimed to assess the effects of preoperative expectations and postoperative outcome actuality, and the difference between the two, on postoperative satisfaction following MIS for lumbar fusion procedures.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for either a 1- or 2-level lumbar fusion MIS were administered confidential surveys preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The surveys administered preoperatively consisted of 2 parts: preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back pain, and VAS leg pain, and expected postoperative PROs. The surveys administered 6 months postoperatively consisted of 2 parts: postoperative PROs and satisfaction. Preoperative symptoms, expected postoperative symptoms, and actual postoperative symptoms were compared using paired t-tests. Pearson correlation was used to compare the association between 1) postoperative change in PROs and satisfaction, 2) expectation and satisfaction, 3) expectation-actuality discrepancy and satisfaction, and 4) actuality and satisfaction.

RESULTS

In total, 101 patients completed all surveys. Patients expected to improve in all PROs from baseline, except for ODI personal care, in which they expected to get worse after surgery. In actuality, patients improved in all PROs from baseline, except for ODI personal care, in which they did not demonstrate improvement or worsening. Patients did not surpass any expectations regarding PRO improvement. The association between patient satisfaction and postoperative change was strong for the VAS back pain score, while ODI and VAS leg pain scores showed moderate correlations. Preoperative expectation and postoperative satisfaction demonstrated weak to moderate correlations for all outcome measures. All 3 PROs demonstrated moderate correlation between patient satisfaction and the expectation-actuality discrepancy. All 3 PROs demonstrated strong correlations between satisfaction and actual postoperative outcomes, with ODI having the strongest correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study, the authors determined that the actual postoperative results following surgery were strongly correlated with patient satisfaction, while the patients' expectation, the expectation-actuality discrepancy, and the postoperative improvement did not demonstrate strong correlations for all patient-reported outcome measures utilized in this study. The investigation results suggest that the most important indicator of how satisfied patients feel following surgery may be the actual outcome itself, rather than the preoperative expectation or the degree to which the expected result was met.

Patient Understanding, Expectations, Outcomes, and Satisfaction Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Surgical Management

Patient satisfaction has become an increasingly important outcome metric in orthopaedics and medicine in general as many initiatives at both the state and national levels aim to improve the efficiency and quality of health care. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are among the most common injuries in orthopaedics, with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery consistently reported as one of the most frequently performed procedures by orthopaedic surgeons. Patient-reported outcomes are frequently used to evaluate outcomes from the patient's perspective, and many physicians also ask patients about their satisfaction with treatment. A growing volume of literature has investigated the relation between preoperative patient expectations and postoperative patient satisfaction. The quality of online resources, patient expectations for ACLR, and factors associated with and/or predictive of either poor or good to excellent outcomes after surgery are described. This article critically reviews the orthopaedic literature on this important topic and identifies variables that influence patient expectations and satisfaction to help treating physicians better counsel and evaluate patients and ultimately improve outcomes of and satisfaction with ACLR surgery.

Instruments used in the assessment of expectation toward a spine surgery: an integrative review

OBJECTIVE

To identify and describe the instruments used to assess patients' expectations toward spine surgery.

METHOD

An integrative review was carried out in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and PsycINFO.

RESULTS

A total of 4,402 publications were identified, of which 25 met the selection criteria. Of the studies selected, only three used tools that had confirmed validity and reliability to be applied; in five studies, clinical scores were used, and were modified for the assessment of patients' expectations, and in 17 studies the researchers developed scales without an adequate description of the method used for their development and validation.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of patients' expectations has been methodologically conducted in different ways. Until the completion of this integrative review, only two valid and reliable instruments had been used in three of the selected studies.

OBJETIVO

Identificar e descrever os instrumentos usados para avaliar a expectativa dos pacientes diante do tratamento cirúrgico da coluna vertebral.

MÉTODO

Revisão Integrativa realizada nas bases de dados PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS e PsycINFO.

RESULTADOS

Identificamos 4.402 publicações, das quais 25 atenderam aos critérios de seleção. Dos estudos selecionados, apenas em três os autores utilizaram instrumentos que possuíam validade e confiabilidade confirmadas para serem aplicados; em cinco estudos foram utilizados escores clínicos, modificados para a avaliação das expectativas dos pacientes, e em dezessete os pesquisadores elaboraram escalas sem adequada descrição do método usado para o seu desenvolvimento e validação.

CONCLUSÃO

A avaliação das expectativas dos pacientes tem sido metodologicamente conduzida de diferentes maneiras. Até a finalização desta revisão integrativa, apenas dois instrumentos, válidos e confiáveis, haviam sido utilizados em três dos estudos selecionados.

The Relationship between Preoperative Expectations and the Short-Term Postoperative Satisfaction and Functional Outcome in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

Study Design Systematic review. Objective To examine the relationship between the patient's preoperative expectations and short-term postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome in lumbar spine surgery. Methods The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were queried using a predefined search algorithm to identify all lumbar spine studies analyzing the influence of preoperative expectations on postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome. Two independent reviewers and a third independent mediator reviewed the literature and performed study screening, selection, methodological assessment, and data extraction using an objective protocol. Results Of 444 studies identified, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality scores ranged from 59 to 100% with the greatest variability in defining patient characteristics and the methods of assessing patient expectations. Patient expectations were assessed in 22 areas, most frequently back and leg pain expectations and general expectations. Functional outcome was assessed by 13 tools; the most common were the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Positive expectations for symptomatology, activity, general health, and recovery correlated with satisfaction. General expectations correlated with higher SF-36 Physical Subcomponent scores, better global function, and lower ODI outcome. Conclusions on the influence of the expectations for pain were limited due to the study heterogeneity, but the evidence suggests a positive correlation between the expectation and outcome for back and leg pain. Conclusions Positive expectations correlated significantly with short-term postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome, including higher SF-36 scores, earlier return to work, and decreased ODI scores. Future expectation-based investigations will benefit from implementation of the standardized methods of expectation, satisfaction, and outcome analysis discussed herein.

The importance, measurement and practical implications of worker's expectations for return to work

PURPOSE

Workers' own expectations for return to work consistently predict work status. To advance the understanding of the relationship between RTW expectations and outcomes, we reviewed existing measures to determine those which we felt were the most likely to capture the construct.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of the work-disability rehabilitation literature was undertaken. The review of the measures was conducted in three steps: first, a review of terminology; second, an examination of whether a time reference was included; third, an evaluation of ease of comprehension, and applicability across contexts.

RESULTS

A total of 42 different measures were identified. One of the most striking findings was the inconsistency in terminology. Measures were also limited by not including a time reference. Problems were also identified with regards to ease of understanding, utility of response options, and applicability in a wide variety of research and applied settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Most previously used measures contain elements that potentially limit utility. However, it would seem that further development can overcome these, resulting in a tool that provides risk prediction information, and an opportunity to start a conversation to help identify problems that might negatively impact a worker's movement through the RTW process and the outcomes achieved. Implications for Rehabilitation Return to work is an integral part of workplace injury management. The capture of RTW expectations affords a way to identify the potential for less than optimal RTW processes and outcomes. A mismatch between an injured worker's expectations and what other stakeholders might expect suggests that efforts could be made to determine what is causing the injured worker's concerns. Once underling issues are identified, work can be put into resolving these so that the worker's return to the workplace is not impeded.

[Profile of the patient with failed back surgery syndrome in the National Institute of Rehabilitation. Comparative analysis]

BACKGROUND

Failed back surgery syndrome is a complication of spine surgery that leads to chronic pain and disability, often with disastrous emotional consequences to the patient.

AIM

To compare the profile of patients whose first surgery was performed in our hospital versus a group that underwent first spine surgery in a different centre.

METHODS

Retrospective study with 65 patients; 18 formed group I (first spine surgery performed in our institution), and 47 patients in group II (first surgery performed in another hospital). Background, demographic, clinical features and functional status were compared. In group I the majority of the cases had a previous diagnosis of lumbar stenosis (group I 44.4% vs group II 25.5% p = 0.22), whereas disk herniation was the main diagnosis in group II (group I 22.2% vs group II 61.7% p = 0.001). The main cause of the syndrome in group I was technical error during surgery (61.1%), while in group II this cause represented only 6.3% (p=.001). Among the patients of this latter group, misdiagnosis was highly prevalent (57.4%), against no cases in group I (p=.001). The preoperative functional status between both groups and their recovery in the immediate postoperative period was similar (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the diagnostic and treatment standards are different between healthcare centres, specifically between academic centres vs. private practice.

Expectations of recovery and functional outcomes following thoracolumbar trauma: an evidence-based medicine process to determine what surgeons should be telling their patients

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to define the expected functional and health-related quality of life outcomes following common thoracolumbar injuries on the basis of consensus expert opinion and the best available literature. Patient expectations are primarily determined by the information provided by health care professionals, and these expectations have been shown to influence outcome in various medical and surgical conditions. This paper presents Part 2 of a multiphase study designed to investigate the impact of patient expectations on outcomes following spinal injury. Part 1 demonstrated substantial variability in the information surgeons are communicating to patients. Defining the expected outcomes following thoracolumbar injury would allow further analysis of this relationship and enable surgeons to more accurately and consistently inform patients.

METHODS

Expert opinion was assembled by distributing questionnaires comprising 4 cases representative of common thoracolumbar injuries to members of the Spine Trauma Study Group (STSG). The 4 cases included a thoracolumbar junction burst fracture treated nonoperatively or with posterior transpedicular instrumentation, a low lumbar (L-4) burst fracture treated nonoperatively, and a thoracolumbar junction flexion-distraction injury managed with posterior fusion. For each case, 5 questions about expected outcomes were posed. The questions related to the proportion of patients who are pain free, the proportion who have regained full range of motion, and the patients' recreational activity restrictions and personal care and social life limitations, all at 1 year following injury, as well as the timing of return to work and length of hospital stay. Responses were analyzed and combined with the results of a systematic literature review on the same injuries to define the expected outcomes.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 38 appropriate studies that met the preset inclusion criteria. Published data were available for all injuries, but not all outcomes were available for each type of injury. The survey was completed by 31 (57%) of 53 surgeons representing 24 trauma centers across North America (15), Europe (5), India (1), Mexico (1), Japan (1) and Israel (1). Consensus expert opinion supplemented the available literature and was used exclusively when published data were lacking. For example, 1 year following cast or brace treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture, the expected outcomes include a 40% chance of being pain free, a 70% chance of regaining pre-injury range of motion, and an expected ability to participate in high-impact exercise and contact sport with no or minimal limitation. Consensus expert opinion predicts reemployment within 4-6 months. The length of inpatient stay averages 4-5 days.

CONCLUSIONS

This synthesis of the best available literature and consensus opinion of surgeons with extensive clinical experience in spine trauma reflects the optimal methodology for determining functional prognosis after thoracolumbar trauma. By providing consistent, accurate information surgeons will help patients develop realistic expectations and potentially optimize outcomes.

Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Recent events in health care reform have brought national attention to integrating patient experiences and expectations into quality metrics. Few studies have comprehensively evaluated the effect of patient expectations on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after surgery. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the available literature describing the relationship between patient expectations and postoperative PROs.

METHODS

We performed a search of the literature published before November 1, 2012. Articles were included in the review if (1) primary data were presented, (2) patient expectations regarding a surgical procedure were measured, (3) PROs were measured, and (4) the relationship between patient expectations and PROs was specifically examined. PROs were categorized into 5 subgroups: Satisfaction, quality of life (QOL), disability, mood disorder, and pain. We examined each study to determine the relationship between patient expectations and PROs as well as study quality.

RESULTS

From the initial literature search yielding 1,708 studies, 60 articles were included. Fulfillment of expectations was associated with improved PROs among 24 studies. Positive expectations were correlated with improved PROs for 28 studies (47%), and poorer PROs for 9 studies (15%). Eighteen studies reported that fulfillment of expectations was correlated with improved patient satisfaction, and 10 studies identified that positive expectations were correlated with improved postoperative. Finally, patients with positive preoperative expectations reported less pain (8 studies) and disability (15 studies) compared with patients with negative preoperative expectations.

CONCLUSION

Patient expectations are inconsistently correlated with PROs after surgery, and there is no accepted method to capture perioperative expectations. Future efforts to rigorously measure expectations and explore their influence on postoperative outcomes can inform clinicians and policymakers seeking to integrate PROs into measures of surgical quality.

Measuring expectations in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Advances in the surgical treatment of musculoskeletal conditions have resulted in an interest in better defining and understanding patients' expectations of these procedures, but the best ways to do this remain a topic of considerable debate.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What validated instruments for the assessment of patient expectations of orthopaedic surgery have been used in published studies to date? (2) How were these expectation measures developed and validated? (3) What unvalidated instruments for the assessment of patient expectations have been used in published studies to date?

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using the OVID Medline and EMBASE databases, in duplicate, to identify all studies that assessed patient expectations in orthopaedic surgery. Sixty-six studies were ultimately included in the present review.

RESULTS

Seven validated expectation instruments were identified, all of which use patient-reported questionnaires. Five were specific to a particular procedure or affected anatomic location, whereas two were broadly applicable. Details of reliability and validity testing were available for all but one of these instruments. Forty additional unvalidated expectation assessment tools were identified. Thirteen were based on existing clinical outcome tools, and the others were study-specific, custom-developed tools. Only one of the unvalidated tools was used in more than one study.

CONCLUSIONS

Several validated expectation instruments have been developed for use by patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. However, many tools have been reported without evidence of testing and validation. The wide range of untested instruments used in single studies substantially limits the interpretation and comparison of data concerning patient expectations.

Development and testing of an expectations survey for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients' expectations of lumbar spine surgery have not been obtained with valid and reliable scales derived from patients' perspectives. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to develop and to test a patient-derived expectations survey.

METHODS

The survey was developed in three phases. Phase 1 involved interviews with patients with open-ended questions about expectations and assembly of a draft survey. Phase 2 involved administering the survey twice to assess test-retest reliability. Phase 3 involved selection of final items based on concordance of responses and clinical relevance, and the development of a scoring rubric.

RESULTS

In Phase 1, 118 preoperative patients with diverse lumbar spine diagnoses volunteered 583 expectations, from which thirty-one discrete categories were discerned and became the items for the draft survey. In Phase 2, another fifty-six preoperative patients completed the draft survey twice, four days apart. In Phase 3, twenty-one items were retained for the final survey addressing symptom relief, return to basic mobility, resumption of activities, and improvement in psychosocial well-being. An overall score was calculated on the basis of the number of expectations and amount of improvement expected and ranged from 0 to 100 points; a higher score indicates more expectations. For patients in Phase 2, the mean scores for both administrations were 66 and 65 points, the Cronbach alpha coefficients for both administrations were 0.90 and 0.92, and the intraclass correlation coefficient between scores was 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a patient-derived survey that is valid, reliable, and applicable to diverse diagnoses and includes physical and psychosocial expectations. The survey generates an overall score that is easy to calculate and to interpret, and thus fills a gap in the assessment of lumbar spine surgery by offering a practical and comprehensive way to record patients' expectations.

An exploration of patients' expectation of and satisfaction with surgical outcome

Purpose

The majority of studies of surgical outcome focus on measures of function and pain. Increasingly, however, the desire to include domains such as patients’ satisfaction and expectations had led to the development of simple measures and their inclusion into clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to determine patients’ pre-operative expectations of and post-operative satisfaction with the outcome of their spinal surgery.

Methods

As part of the FASTER randomised controlled trial, patients were asked pre-operatively to quantify their expected improvement in pain and health status at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months following surgery using 100 mm visual analogue scales (VAS), and to indicate their confidence in achieving this result and also the importance of this recovery to them. Patients were then asked to rate their satisfaction with the improvement achieved at each post-operative review using 100 mm VAS.

Results

Although differences between patients’ expectation and achievement were minimal 6 weeks post-operatively, there was a clear discrepancy at 6 months and 1 year, with patient expectations far exceeding achievement. There were significant correlations between failure to achieve expectations and the importance patients attached to this recovery at each post-operative assessment, but not with their confidence in achieving this result. Satisfaction levels remained high despite expectations not being met, with discectomy patients being more satisfied than decompression patients.

Conclusions

Patients’ pre-operative expectations of surgical outcome exceed their long-term achievement. The more importance the patient attached to a good outcome, the larger is the discrepancy between expectation and achievement. Despite this, satisfaction levels remained high. The impact of unrealistic expectations on outcome remains unclear.

Relationship between preoperative expectations, satisfaction, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery: a multicenter study

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of prospectively collected multicenter data.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between preoperative expectations and postoperative outcomes and satisfaction in lumbar and cervical spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Back pain is one of the most common health problems, leading to the utilization of health care resources, work loss, and sick benefits. Patient expectations influence posttreatment outcomes, both surgical and nonsurgical. There is little research on the importance of preoperative expectations in spine surgery. Existing studies evaluate the technical aspects of interventions and functional outcomes but fail to take into account patient expectations. The authors hypothesized that expectations dramatically affect spine patient satisfaction independent of functional outcomes.

METHODS

Prospectively collected patient-entered data from patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery from 2 study centers collected using a Web-based patient health survey system were analyzed. The study included patients who underwent operative intervention (decompression with or without fusion) with at least a 3-month period of follow-up. Preoperative expectations were measured using the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System's (MODEMS) expectation survey. Postoperative satisfaction and fulfillment of expectations were measured using the MODEMS satisfaction survey. Postoperative functional outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index and 36-item short form health survey. Ordinal logistic regression multivariate modeling was used to examine predictors of postoperative satisfaction. Linear regression multivariate modeling was used to examine predictors of functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Greater fulfillment of expectations led to higher postoperative satisfaction and was associated with better functional outcomes. Higher preoperative expectations led to decreased postsurgical satisfaction but were associated with improved functional outcomes. Higher postoperative satisfaction was associated with improved functional outcomes and vice versa. Type of surgery also influenced satisfaction and function, with cervical patients being less satisfied but having better functional outcomes than lumbar patients.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that more than functional outcomes matter; preoperative expectations and fulfillment of expectations influence postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery. This underlines the importance of taking preoperative expectations into account to obtain an informed choice on the basis of the patient's preferences.

Leg pain and psychological variables predict outcome 2-3 years after lumbar fusion surgery

Prediction studies testing a thorough range of psychological variables in addition to demographic, work-related and clinical variables are lacking in lumbar fusion surgery research. This prospective cohort study aimed at examining predictions of functional disability, back pain and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) 2-3 years after lumbar fusion by regressing nonlinear relations in a multivariate predictive model of pre-surgical variables. Before and 2-3 years after lumbar fusion surgery, patients completed measures investigating demographics, work-related variables, clinical variables, functional self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, fear of movement/(re)injury, mental health and pain coping. Categorical regression with optimal scaling transformation, elastic net regularization and bootstrapping were used to investigate predictor variables and address predictive model validity. The most parsimonious and stable subset of pre-surgical predictor variables explained 41.6, 36.0 and 25.6% of the variance in functional disability, back pain intensity and HRQOL 2-3 years after lumbar fusion. Pre-surgical control over pain significantly predicted functional disability and HRQOL. Pre-surgical catastrophizing and leg pain intensity significantly predicted functional disability and back pain while the pre-surgical straight leg raise significantly predicted back pain. Post-operative psychomotor therapy also significantly predicted functional disability while pre-surgical outcome expectations significantly predicted HRQOL. For the median dichotomised classification of functional disability, back pain intensity and HRQOL levels 2-3 years post-surgery, the discriminative ability of the prediction models was of good quality. The results demonstrate the importance of pre-surgical psychological factors, leg pain intensity, straight leg raise and post-operative psychomotor therapy in the predictions of functional disability, back pain and HRQOL-related outcomes.

The impact of patient expectations on outcome following treatment for spinal trauma: Part 1: What are spine surgeons telling their patients?

STUDY DESIGN

Surgeon completed questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE

To determine information provided by spine surgeons to patients, part of a 4-part study determining the impact of patient expectations on outcome following spinal trauma.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

An important goal of treatment is patient satisfaction, which may be influenced by patient expectations. Impact of patient expectations on outcome has been demonstrated in various elective orthopedic populations. It is anticipated that there will be similar, if not greater, impact on outcome in a trauma setting.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed, in a case-based format, to determine the information provided by spine surgeons to their patients. There were 3 questionnaires, each consisting of 5 cases and grouped by cervical spine trauma, thoracolumbar spine trauma, and spinal cord injury. These questionnaires were distributed to members of the Spine Trauma Study Group and our division. Statistical analysis consisted of a single-factor random effects model. In this analysis, the degree of variability was quantified as the ratio of surgeon induced variance over total variance for the questions.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were distributed to 54 surgeons and 31 responses received (57%). There was substantial variability in responses ranging from a ratio of 9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-26] for the regaining range of motion 1 year following cervical spine trauma domain to a ratio of 84% (95% CI: 69-92) for the early postoperative spasticity following spinal cord injury domain.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated substantial variability in the information provided by spine surgeons to spine trauma patients and the need to improve the quality of information provided, allowing patient expectations to be more appropriate, potentially maximizing their outcome. Further areas for study include, assessment of the best available evidence on which to base information provided to spinal trauma patients, determination of what information spinal trauma patients view as relevant and the effect appropriate expectations have on outcome.

The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Patient's expectations are variably reported to influence self-rated outcome and satisfaction after medical treatment; this prospective study examined which of the following was the most important unique determinant of global outcome/satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): baseline expectations; fulfillment of expectations; or current symptoms and function.

METHODS

One hundred and twelve patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (age, 67 +/- 9 years) completed a questionnaire about their expectations regarding months until full recovery, pain, and limitations in everyday activities after TKA surgery. Two years postoperatively, they were asked what the reality was for each of these domains, and rated the global outcome and satisfaction with surgery. Multivariable regression analyses using forward conditional selection of variables (and controlling for age, gender, other joint problems) identified the most significant determinants of outcome.

RESULTS

Patients significantly underestimated the time for full recovery (expected 4.7 +/- 2.8 months, recalled actual time, 6.1 +/- 3.7 months; P = 0.005). They were also overly optimistic about the likelihood of being pain-free (85% expected it, 43% were; P < 0.05) and of not being limited in usual activities (52% expected it, 20% were; P < 0.05). Global outcomes were 46.2% excellent, 41.3% good, 10.6% fair and 1.9% poor. In multivariable regression, expectations did not make a significant unique contribution to explaining the variance in outcome/satisfaction; together with other joint problems, knee pain and function at 2 years postoperation predicted global outcome, and knee pain at 2 years predicted satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

In this group, preoperative expectations of TKA surgery were overly optimistic. The routine analysis of patient-orientated outcomes in practice should assist the surgeon to convey more realistic expectations to the patient during the preoperative consultation. In multivariable regression, expectations did not predict global outcome/satisfaction; the most important determinants were other joint problems and the patient's pain and functional status 2 years postoperatively.

Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The present study compared different theories on the role of expectations in a group of patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients' expectations of treatment are a potentially important predictor of self-rated outcome after surgery. Some studies suggest that high baseline expectations per se yield better outcomes, others maintain that the fulfillment of prior expectations is paramount, and still others assert that it is the actual improvement in symptom status that governs outcome, regardless of prior expectations.

METHODS

Hundred patients took part (33 F, 67 M; mean [SD] age, 65 [11] yrs). Before surgery, they completed a booklet containing the Roland-Morris (RM) disability questionnaire, 0-10 pain graphic rating scales (back and leg separately), and Likert-scales about the degree of improvement expected in various domains. Two and 12 months after surgery, questions were answered regarding the perceived improvement for each of these domains, the RM and pain scales were completed again, and the patients rated the global outcome on a 5-point Likert-scale.

RESULTS

Compared with the actual improvement recorded at 12 months, prior expectations had been overly optimistic in about 40% patients for the domains leg pain, back pain, walking capacity, social life, mental well-being, and independence, and in 50% patients for everyday activities and sport. There was no significant relationship between baseline expectations and follow-up scores for back pain, leg pain, RM-disability (corrected for baseline values), or global outcome. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that "expectations being fulfilled" was the most significant predictor of global outcome.

CONCLUSION

In this patient group, expectations of surgery were overly optimistic. Having one's expectations fulfilled was most important for a good outcome. The results emphasize the importance of assessing patient-orientated outcome in routine practice, and the factors that might influence it, such that realistic expectations can be established for patients before surgery.

Evaluation of preoperative expectations and patient satisfaction after carpal tunnel release

PURPOSE

We tested the hypothesis that preoperative expectations affect postoperative satisfaction and arm-specific, self-reported health status after elective carpal tunnel release.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients having elective carpal tunnel release completed questionnaires evaluating self-rated upper extremity-specific disability using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, expectations regarding surgery (Preop Expectations Score), personal importance of upper-extremity function, measures of general optimism, the Life Orientation Test (LOT), as well as health-specific optimism, and the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale. Six months after surgery, patients completed a 10-point Likert scale to assess satisfaction, the DASH, and measures determining (1) fulfillment of expectations (Postop Met Expectations Score) and (2) relief of specific systems (Postop Help Score).

RESULTS

The DASH scores decreased significantly from an average of 37 points before surgery to an average of 15 points 6 months after carpal tunnel release (p<.001), and patients rated their satisfaction (mean +/- standard deviation) as 8 +/- 3. Preoperative expectations did not correlate with patient satisfaction or postoperative DASH scores. Multivariable analyses determined that patient satisfaction was best predicted by fulfillment of expectations (Postop Help Score alone, accounting for 41% of the variance in scores) and postoperative DASH scores were predicted by a combination of Postop Met Expectations Score and the LOT score (accounting for 31% of the variance in scores).

CONCLUSIONS

As measured in this study, the strongest predictor of satisfaction after carpal tunnel release was relief of symptoms, and the strongest predictors of postoperative disability were met expectations and optimism; however, the majority of the variance in postoperative satisfaction remains unexplained.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic III.

Lumbar spinal stenosis patients are satisfied with short-term results of surgery - younger age, symptom severity, disability and depression decrease satisfaction

PURPOSE

To study the lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients' (n = 98) satisfaction with surgery outcome and associated factors at three months post-operative stage.

METHOD

LSS-related physical functioning and pain were assessed with Oswestry disability index, Stucki questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale and pain drawings. Depression was assessed with 21-item Beck Depression Inventory. Psychological well-being was assessed with the Life satisfaction scale, Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Sense of Coherence Scale. All questionnaires were administered before and 3 months after surgical treatment of LSS. Satisfaction with surgery outcome was assessed with a separate scale.

RESULTS

Considerable improvement was evident in all the functional and pain-related variables. Two-thirds (66%) of the patients were at least clearly satisfied with the surgery outcome. Younger age, symptom severity, disability and depression were independently associated with dissatisfaction with surgery outcome.

CONCLUSION

The lack of physical, functional and emotional well-being is associated with the patients' dissatisfaction with the surgery outcome. Patient satisfaction is a valid outcome to be measured in LSS patients undergoing surgery. It is recommended that patients should be provided with realistic pre-operative patient information and that depression be assessed pre-operatively.

Patients' satisfaction with provided care/information and expectations on clinical outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study of patients undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess patients' satisfaction with care/preoperative information, if expectations on surgical results and ability to return to work are related to baseline characteristics, and/or can predict self-reported outcome. Self-reported outcome was compared with objective outcome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients' expectations on treatment results have been discussed as a predictive factor for postoperative outcome and satisfaction demonstrated to be directly related to patient expectations.

METHODS

The study includes 148 patients, 46% women, mean age 40 (range 18-66). Before and 2 years after surgery, questionnaires about given information/care, expected/present work ability, and expectations on/obtained improvement of physical functions/symptoms (leg and back pain, sensibility, and muscle function) were filled in. The visual analog scale leg pain, Zung Depression Scale, and Oswestry Disability Index were used as baseline characteristics. At 2-year follow-up, self-reported and objective outcome was assessed.

RESULTS

Satisfaction with given information/care were reported by 46% and 82%, respectively. Zung Depression Scale related to expectations on leg pain recovery (P = 0.022), work ability (P = 0.046), and satisfaction with given information (P = 0.031). Patients who expected to return (76%) and not return (24%) to work, returned in 78% and 26%, respectively (P = 0.021). A high agreement between self-reported outcome and objective outcome were found (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery are mostly satisfied with provided care before and after surgery, however, less satisfied with information provided. Further, patients with preoperative positive expectations on work return and realistic expectations on pain and physical recovery have a greater chance to be satisfied with the surgical results.

Depression and associated factors in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence of depression and associated factors in patients (n = 100) with lumbar spinal stenosis selected for surgical treatment.

METHOD

Depression was assessed with the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory. Psychological well-being was assessed with Life Satisfaction Scale, Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Sense of Coherence Scale. Physical functioning and pain were assessed with the Oswestry disability index, the questionnaire devised by Stucki and the Visual Analogue Scale. All questionnaires were administered before surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

RESULTS

Twenty percent of the patients with LSS were found to have clinically important depression. In univariate analyses, subjective disability measured with the Oswestry disability index, low sense of coherence and poor life satisfaction were common in depressed patients. In the multiple logistic regression analyses, being dissatisfied with life was associated with depression. When sense of coherence score was included in the model, then only low sense of coherence was independently associated with depression. Neither socio-demographic nor pain-related factors associated with depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically important depression is rather common among preoperative patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The factors associated with depression are subjective disability of everyday living and decreased life satisfaction. A low sense of coherence is an important correlate of depression. The results underline the importance of assessing depression in clinical practice dealing with these patients.

Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a perioperative pain experience

AIM

The aim was to evaluate patient's perioperative pain experience after total hip replacement and patients' satisfaction with pain management.

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure intended to reduce pain and return patients to better function. Realistic expectations about total hip arthroplasty is important for optimal postoperative recovery and the information must be adapted to fit the individual patient.

METHODS

A descriptive design was used comparing patients outcome data. Pitman's test was used for statistical analyses. Adult patients (n = 112) undergoing surgical hip replacement procedures answered a 17-item questionnaire on the fourth postoperative day. The questionnaire included given alternatives and visual analogue scales (0-100 mm) for the pain assessment.

RESULT

The patients' postoperative pain experience after hip replacement surgery was in average low, 33.1 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Patient's pain experience was reported to be highest on the first postoperative day for most of the patients. The preoperative pain experience tends to be higher than the postoperative pain experience. Older patients reported less average pain level postoperatively. Satisfaction with pain management was high.

CONCLUSION

The pain experience tends to be higher preoperatively than postoperatively. Patients who reported a higher pain experience postoperatively reported that their pain experience was significant higher than preoperative expected.

RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE

It is important for the postoperative outcome measure that the patients have a realistic expectation of pain experiences after total hip arthroplasty. The nurse is one of the staff members responsible for information to the individual patient.

Outcome expectancies, functional outcomes, and expectancy fulfillment for patients with shoulder problems

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship among patient outcome expectancies, perceived shoulder function changes, and perceptions of expectancy fulfillment.

METHODS

Patients (n = 199) treated for shoulder problems at one orthopedic surgeon's office completed a baseline survey comprised of measures of outcome expectancies, shoulder function, health status, and demographics. At 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months, patients completed a mailed follow-up survey comprised of all baseline measures except demographic variables. At 3 months, a measure of expectancy fulfillment was added. A general linear modeling approach was used to assess the significance and effect size of 1) outcome expectancies on changes in shoulder function; and (2) outcome expectancies, shoulder function changes, and their interaction on perceptions of expectancy fulfillment.

RESULTS

Outcome expectancies significantly predicted changes in shoulder function and accounted for 10% of the variance in functional improvement. The improvement difference between patients with high expectancies compared with those with low expectancies was clinically relevant (4.57 points), as it was greater than the minimal clinically important difference (3.02 points). Outcome expectancies and shoulder function changes significantly predicted patients' perceptions of fulfilled expectancies, but their interaction was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight the importance of patient expectancy in medical encounters. The findings suggest the need for interventions targeting patient expectancies such as including discussions about expectancy in patient-physician negotiations of therapeutic plans. Results also underscore the need for the development of better measures of outcome expectancies and expectancy fulfillment.

Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty

Sixty-six consecutive revision total hip arthroplasty patients were asked about their expectations regarding future pain and walking ability. Expectations were high, regardless of background factors: 92% expected to have much less pain, and 82% expected the same walking ability as after the primary arthroplasty or a much improved walking ability. Of the patients, 56% stated a non-surgeon-related origin of expectations, 7% were uncertain, and 37% said expectations derived from the surgeon. At 1 year, Harris hip score had increased from a median 45 to 77 points, but only 69% and 55% said that their expectations had been fulfilled to a very large or rather large extent regarding pain and walking ability. The only predictor of fulfilled expectations was absence of complications (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-20.8). Patient satisfaction was only moderate; 63% were very or rather satisfied with a moderate correlation (0.46-0.47) between satisfaction and fulfilled expectations. Patients with a poor preoperative hip condition generally were more satisfied (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-17.9), and the most important reason probably was an improved walking ability (r = 0.64). Patient dissatisfaction may originate from unrealistic expectations. At preoperative consultation, it is recommended that the surgeon discuss the revision patient's expectations, especially regarding future walking ability, and inform the patient about the fundamental prognostic differences between revision and primary hip arthroplasty.

Expected and reported pain in children undergoing ear piercing: a randomized trial of preparation by parents

This study examined experimentally the effectiveness of preparatory information provided by parents in creating accurate expectations and reducing children's procedural pain. Ear piercing was used as an analogue to minor painful medical procedures. Sixty children, aged 5-12 years, requesting ear piercing and accompanied by their parents, were randomly assigned to a parental information or contact-control condition. Parents in the information group were asked to read their child a description of the procedures and sensations of ear piercing. Parents in the contact-control condition played picture games for the same amount of time. Expected pain was measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) before and after the parental information or contact-control procedure. Experienced pain was measured on the same two scales immediately after the ear piercing. Prepared children had more accurate expectations and reported significantly less pain (M=27.3) than non-prepared children (M=49.8). The validity of the measures was supported by strong correlations (r=0.87 to 0.96) between the VAS and FPS-R. The findings suggest that parental provision of preparatory information creates accurate expectations and reduces pain for children.

Influence of expectations and actual pain experiences on satisfaction with postoperative pain management

Experience of moderate or even severe postoperative pain has remained a clinical problem despite major progress in pain assessment and management. The aim of the present study was to assess any association between different pre- as well as postoperative factors, actual pain experiences in the postoperative period, and the overall patient satisfaction with the pain management. A random sample of surgical patients (n =191) responded to pre- and postoperative questionnaires detailing presence of preoperative baseline pain, expected and actually experienced postoperative pain levels and perceived adequacy of the pain relief provided. Patient satisfaction was assessed and factors of importance for satisfaction/dissatisfaction were analysed. It was found that 88% of the patients had previously undergone surgical procedures and that 53% of these patients claimed to have experienced moderate or severe pain at that time. Current pain prior to the present surgical procedure was reported by 61% of the patients. Most patients (91%) expected pain of moderate to severe intensity and 76% reported to have experienced such pain levels. In spite of this 81% of the patients claimed to be satisfied with the pain management while only 8% were dissatisfied. Sex, age, pre-operative expectation and actual experience of pain relief, and the overall pain experience were found to be factors associated with the probability of being satisfied/dissatisfied. Main characteristics of the dissatisfied patient were a younger age and female sex. It is concluded that patients commonly expect moderate to severe pain in the postoperative period and that the actual pain experience is mainly in accordance with the pre-operative expectations. Therefore, the validity of patient satisfaction as an optimal outcome variable in quality assurance processes of postoperative pain management may be questioned.

Patient expectations for surgery: are they being met?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to determine patient expectations for the outcomes of three elective surgical procedures, the extent to which patient expectations for surgery were met, the reasons for unmet expectations, and the factors that might predict unmet expectations. Better understanding of these questions might help identify targeted interventions to better prepare patients for specific health care experiences.

METHODS

In a longitudinal, prospective design, a convenience sample of 445 patients (age range, 18 to 86 years) at a general surgery clinic at a major academic medical center was included--177 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, 146 undergoing parathyroidectomy, and 122 undergoing cholecystectomy. Patients completed both standardized and newly developed condition-specific health survey instruments. Preoperative interviews were administered, followed by mailed surveys 2 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Between 9% and 27% of the respondents reported unmet expectations, with significant variation by condition; reasons included perceived lack of symptom relief, surgical complications, and process of care issues. Patients undergoing parathyroidectomy had a greater probability of unmet expectations. Both feeling prepared for surgery and improved postoperative symptom relief and role functioning reduced the probability of unmet expectations.

DISCUSSION

To reduce the level of unmet expectations, patients need to be prepared both for the surgical experience and for what to expect in the recovery phase. This is especially true for complex illnesses such as primary hyperparathyroidism. Innovative educational strategies to ensure adequate preparation for surgery will be needed, and attention will need to be paid to latent, unstated process measures, if unmet expectations are to be reduced.