Superimposition of PET images using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose with magnetic resonance images in patients with pancreatic carcinoma

Usefulness of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to confirm suspected pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer is among the five most lethal malignancies in the world. Unfortunately, many malignant tumors go undetected by the current primary diagnostic tools. (18)FDG-PET and (18)FDG-PET/CT might be useful to confirm suspected pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed using all major search engines. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed as well as quality of the PET-protocol. The following pooled estimates served as primary outcome measures: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were included. Pooled estimates for (18)FDG-PET were: sensitivity 90%, specificity 76%, PPV 90%, NPV 76% and accuracy 86%. Pooled estimates for (18)FDG-PET/CT were: sensitivity 90%, specificity 76%, PPV 89%, NPV 78% and accuracy 86%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for (18)FDG-PET to differentiate between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis were 90% and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both (18)FDG-PET and (18)FDG-PET/CT offer no benefit over the current primary diagnostic tools in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. However, the (18)FDG-PET/CT systems are still improving. We should investigate the sensitivity and specificity of these new systems while reevaluating the tradeoff between false positive and false negative results. Yet, (18)FDG-PET/CT may have a role in the staging of pancreatic cancer, in survival prediction, and may add to other diagnostic information, like histology.

The possible role of F-18 FDG positron emission tomography in the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic lesions

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic values of different methods for the differentiation of malignant from benign pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

In 22 patients with focal pancreatic lesions, the carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level was measured; abdominal ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) were performed; and the value of these methods were analyzed for their use in cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Malignant lesions were identified in six patients and verified by surgery or clinical follow-up. The CA 19-9 level was elevated in four of the five patients examined (sensitivity, 80%). In all six cases, US and CT revealed hypoechogenic and hypodense areas (sensitivity, 100%). In one patient, ERCP was unsuccessful but yielded true-positive results in three others (sensitivity, 60%). The sensitivity of FDG PET was 100%. Sixteen focal cases of pancreatic disease proved to be benign. The CA 19-9 level was elevated in four of them (specificity, 73%). Hypoechogenic and hypodense areas were evident on US and CT in eight patients. The specificity of CT was 50% (8 of 16 cases). The specificity of US was 47% (7 of 15 cases). The specificity of successful ERCP was 92%. Fourteen negative FDG-PET results were truly negative. In two patients, however, the PET findings proved to be falsely positive (specificity, 88%).

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET is an effective tool to differentiate malignant from benign focal pancreatic lesions. In persons with focal pancreatic hypoechogenic or hypodense lesions detected by CT or US and an elevated CA 19-9 level, FDG PET should be the next step in the diagnostic strategy.

Limited value of positron emission tomography in treatment of pancreatic cancer: surgeon's view

We aimed to assess, from a surgical point of view, the value of positron emission tomography (PET) in the routine preoperative diagnostic evaluation of a pancreatic mass. In particular, we were interested in PET's ability to distinguish a malignancy from a nonmalignant process and its impact on surgical decision making. We documented prospectively the results of preoperative ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and PET in terms of a correct diagnosis of malignancy in 103 patients. All patients underwent surgery at our department and had a complete histologic workup. We then related the preoperative findings to the intraoperative and histologic findings and analyzed the advantages and limitations of PET in comparison with conventional diagnostic techniques. Both CT and PET showed high sensitivities (82% and 84%, respectively) but rather low specificities (61%). ERCP showed good specificity at 83% but weak sensitivity at 46%. The positive predictive value was higher than 80% for all methods, whereas the negative predictive value was around 60% at best. Both the CT and the PET diagnoses were wrong in 15% of the cases. In all cases with a false CT diagnosis, the results of the other conventional examinations provided sufficient evidence to indicate the need for surgical intervention. In all cases where PET gave misleading results, CT findings indicated the need for surgery. PET overlooked pT1 cancers in three of the patients. PET does not reliably prove or exclude malignancy in situations where conventional diagnostic procedures leave doubt as to the nature of a pancreatic mass. PET does introduce a new procedure-related spectrum of misinterpretations to the diagnostic process.

Pancreatic imaging. New modalities

This article discusses the techniques and applications of the newest pancreatic cross-sectional imaging modalities. The specific modalities that are discussed include helical computed tomography with dual phase imaging and three-dimensional computer rendering techniques, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic and intraductal pancreatic sonography, and radionuclide scintigraphy using positron emission scanning and somatostatin-receptor imaging.

Oncological applications of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose

Positron emission tomography (PET) is now primarily used in oncological indication owing to the successful application of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in an increasing number of clinical indications at different stages of diagnosis, and for staging and follow-up. This review first considers the biological characteristics of FDG and then discusses methodological considerations regarding its use. Clinical indications are considered, and the results achieved in respect of various organs and tumour types are reviewed in depth. The review concludes with a brief consideration of the ways in which clinical PET might be improved.