Comparative study of sultamicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate: treatment of acute otitis media

Tuberculin test can be read after 24 hours in adolescent children

OBJECTIVE

To assess readability of 24-h tuberculin response in adolescent school children.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study in school.

SUBJECTS

601 healthy adolescent children.

INTERVENTIONS

Tuberculin (1TU PPD RT23 Tween80) was administered and indurations at 24 and 72 h were compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Tuberculin reaction at 24 h.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve children (18.6%) had a positive tuberculin reaction. Prevalence of tuberculin positivity was least (14.2%) in the 10-year age-group and maximum in the 13-year age-group (21.2%). When individual values of tuberculin reaction at 24 and 72 h were compared, a significant difference was noted irrespective of the tuberculin status (t = 8.46, p = 0.001). However, when tuberculin reaction was considered as positive or negative, this difference was not significant (t = 1.89, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tuberculin status in adolescents can be read as positive or negative at 24 h, irrespective of their bacillus Calmette-Guérin scar status.

Ampicillin-sulbactam: an update on the use of parenteral and oral forms in bacterial infections

Ampicillin-sulbactam has a wide range of antibacterial activity that includes Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. However, the drug is not active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and pathogens producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. The combination could be considered particularly active against Acinetobacter baumannii infections due to the intrinsic activity of sulbactam. The drug is indicated as empirical therapy for a broad range of community acquired infections supervened in adults or children and is effective in either parenteral (ampicillin-sulbactam) or oral (as a mutual prodrug sultamicillin) form. In clinical trials, sultamicillin has proved clinically and bacteriologically effective in adults and children against a variety of frequently encountered infections, including mild upper and lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, diabetic foot and skin and soft tissue infections. Furthermore, adverse effects rarely occur with the diarrhoea to represent the most commonly reported. The parenteral ampicillin-sulbactam is indicated for community infections of mild-to-moderate severity acquired infections such as intra-abdominal or gynecological. Moreover, it seems to represent the alternative of choice for the treatment of A. baumannii infections for carbapenem-resistant strains in the nosocomial setting. Thus, ampicillin-sulbactam remains a valuable agent in the physician's armamentarium in the management of adult and pediatric infections.

Comparison of study designs for acute otitis media trials

BACKGROUND

A framework for evaluating the efficacy of antibiotics in development as well as those currently approved for acute otitis media (AOM) is needed.

OBJECTIVE

Review strengths and limitations of various antibiotic trial designs and their outcome measures.

METHODS

A review of 157 published trials involving 36,710 subjects for the treatment of AOM.

RESULTS

AOM trials have three designs: (1) clinical, clinical diagnosis and assessment of outcomes; (2) single tympanocentesis, microbiologic diagnosis (by middle ear fluid culture) and clinical assessment of outcomes; and (3) double tympanocentesis, microbiologic diagnosis and microbiologic outcome assessment. Identifiable strengths and limitations of each design are reviewed. Case definitions for entry of children in trials of AOM vary widely. The lack of stringent diagnostic criteria in a clinical design allows for inclusion of a significant proportion of children with a non-bacterial etiology (i.e., viral AOM or otitis media with effusion). Tympanocentesis increases diagnostic accuracy at study entry; however, the procedure is confounding because of its potentially therapeutic benefit and the procedure is not performed in a uniform manner. A second tympanocentesis allows a high sensitivity to detect microbiologic eradication, but it does not correlate with clinical outcomes in half of the cases. The timing of outcome assessment also varies widely among trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved clinical diagnosis criteria for AOM are needed to enhance specificity; emphasis on a bulging tympanic membrane has the best evidence base. Tympanocentesis within study designs has merits. At study entry it assures diagnostic accuracy but may alter outcomes and it is useful to document microbiologic outcomes but lacks specificity for clinical outcomes. For all designs, test of cure assessment 2-7 days after completion of therapy seems most appropriate.

Amoxicillin-sulbactam versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for the treatment of non-recurrent-acute otitis media in Argentinean children

Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp) and Haemophilus influenzae (Hi) are the leading bacterial cause of acute otitis media (AOM), having the nasopharynx (NP) as their reservoir. In October 2001 we began a prospective, multicenter, randomized, evaluator blind study, comparing the efficacy of amoxicillin-sulbactam (Ax/S) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (Ax/C) for the treatment of non-recurrent AOM (nr-AOM). Both antimicrobial susceptibility (AS) to Ax/S and Ax/C from Sp and Hi carried by study children (aged 6-48 months with nr-AOM) and, clinical outcome after treatment with high dose of either Ax/C (7:1) or Ax/S (4:1) (amoxicillin dose: 80 mg/(kg day), b.i.d. for 10 days) were assessed. Nasal cultures (NCs) were taken at Day 0. Follow-up NCs, were done only for Sp carriers. On final analysis 247/289 pts (85.5%) were fully evaluable (120 Ax/S and 127 Ax/C). NP carriage rate of Hi and Sp at Day 0 was 32.2% (93/289 pts) and 28.7% (83/289 pts), respectively. Persistent Sp carriage was detected only in 2 pts. Hi betalactamase positive rate was 13% (12/93). MICs for Ax/S and Ax/C were identical when tested against Sp and Hi isolates (range < or = 0.016-1.0 and < or = 0.016-0.25 mg/L, respectively). Clinical efficacy at Days 12-14 and 28-42 were 98.3% (115/117) and 94.2% (97/103) for Ax/S; and 98.3% (115/117) and 95.1% (98/103) for Ax/C, respectively (pNS). We conclude, that Sp and Hi isolated from NCs of nr-AOM pts were highly sensitive to both drugs and correlated with high clinical efficacy rate.

Experience with ampicillin/sulbactam in severe infections

The emergence of beta-lactamase-mediated resistance to established beta-lactam antibiotics prompted the development of beta-lactamase inhibitors for co-administration. Ampicillin has been combined with sulbactam for both parenteral and oral (as the mutual pro-drug sultamicillin) administration. The combination is active in vitro against a wide variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including aerobic and anaerobic organisms. In clinical trials, ampicillin/sulbactam has proved clinically and bacteriologically effective against a variety of frequently encountered pediatric infections, including mild-to-moderate upper respiratory tract infections (acute otitis media, sinusitis, pharyngitis, and tonsillitis), severe post-operative and intra-abdominal infections, periorbital infections (which, left untreated, can lead to blindness, brain abscess, or death), acute epiglottitis, bacterial meningitis, and brain abscess. Ampicillin/sulbactam has also proved effective in the prevention of post-operative surgical infections in pediatric patients. The clinical efficacy profile of ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin, combined with their excellent tolerability profile, make these agents attractive options for the management of many life-threatening infections in pediatric patients.

Role of sultamicillin and ampicillin/sulbactam in the treatment of upper and lower bacterial respiratory tract infections

The emergence of beta-lactamase-mediated resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics among key respiratory tract pathogens has threatened the usefulness of the beta-lactam agents familiar to physicians as being clinically effective and well tolerated. This article reassesses the clinical usefulness of ampicillin when administered in combination with the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam, either intravenously or orally (as the mutual prodrug sultamicillin), in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Numerous clinical studies and several meta-analyses indicate that ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin are clinically effective and well tolerated in both adults and children, in agreement with published North American and European guidelines.

Use of ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin in pediatric infections: a re-evaluation

Ampicillin/sulbactam is an effective solution to the emergence of beta-lactamase-mediated resistance among common pediatric pathogens, and is a widely recognized treatment option for a variety of pediatric infections. Recent antimicrobial surveillance data confirm the continued susceptibility of many Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes to ampicillin/sulbactam. Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated high drug concentrations at a variety of infection sites, including cerebrospinal fluid and bone. Furthermore, clinical studies have shown that ampicillin/sulbactam, administered intravenously, intramuscularly or orally (as the mutual prodrug sultamicillin), is clinically and bacteriologically effective against upper and lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, skin, bone and soft-tissue infections, and meningitis, and provides effective surgical prophylaxis. Sultamicillin has an excellent tolerability profile, which is associated with a low rate of treatment discontinuation. Accordingly, ampicillin/sulbactam and sultamicillin should be considered first-choice options for the management of a variety of pediatric infections.

Compliance of German pediatric patients with oral antibiotic therapy: results of a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Noncompliance with a prescribed therapy is a common problem in ambulatory pediatrics.

OBJECTIVE

To establish a nationwide status quo of compliance of German ambulatory pediatric patients with oral antibiotics prescribed for various bacterial infections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, organized and financed by the German Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 42 pediatricians in private practice who were selected to represent the 3 main regions of Germany and residence in large cities or small towns, respectively, enrolled consecutive patients who had bacterial infections that required therapy with oral antibiotics. Choice of agent and duration of treatment were left to the study physicians. Compliance was measured by a standardized telephone interview on the penultimate day and a urine bioassay for antibacterial activity on the last day of the planned treatment period. Parents did not know the true purpose of the study.

RESULTS

Five hundred eight-four patients were fully evaluable. The most frequent diagnoses included tonsillopharyngitis (n = 231), otitis media (n = 170) and lower respiratory tract infections (n = 114). Most frequently prescribed antibiotics included amoxicillin (n = 102), potassium penicillin V (n = 81) and clarithromycin (n = 67). Overall compliance (positive urine test) on the last day of therapy was 69.5% (406 of 584 patients). Compliance was not significantly influenced by the region of residence or the underlying bacterial infection. It was significantly associated with the antibiotic used (macrolides, 89.0%; penicillins, 62.2%; cephalosporins, 66.4%; P = 0.0001 for macrolides vs. the others). Best compliance was found with clarithromycin (94.0%) and erythromycin estolate (89.8%). Compliance was also significantly better in patients > or =6 years old (77.7%; P = 0.016); with a treatment duration of < or =7 days (77.6%; P = 0.014); when the drug package contained a dose-taking reminder (79.7%; P = 0.003); and when the pediatrician's behavior toward the patient was assessed by the parents as "very sympathetic" or "sympathetic" (72.6%; P = 0.017). Subjecting all variables to logistic regression analysis, we found 3 variables to be significant predictors of treatment compliance: choice of antibiotic (P = 0.0001); patient age (P = 0.0008); and residence in town or city (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

A noncompliance rate of >30% is unsatisfactory. Whereas some variables significantly associated with compliance cannot be influenced (patient age; place of residence in town or city), others are amenable to modifications. These include the physician-patient interaction and the choice of antibiotic. Agents should be preferred that are well-accepted by patients, that enable short-term therapy with few daily doses and with a package that contains a dose-taking reminder.

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of erythromycin estolate versus amoxicillin for the treatment of acute otitis media in children. AOM Study Group

Erythromycin is frequently prescribed in Germany for acute otitis media, but well-designed clinical trials under present epidemiological conditions are lacking. Therefore, a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial was performed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of erythromycin estolate versus amoxicillin in children with acute otitis media and to identify the risk factors associated with clinical failure. Investigators from 19 centers throughout Germany recruited 302 children with clinical, otoscopic, and tympanometric evidence of acute otitis media. In a double-blind fashion, patients were allocated randomly to a 10-day course of erythromycin estolate at 40 mg/kg/day in two divided doses or amoxicillin at 50 mg/kg/day in two divided doses. Clinical examinations, otoscopy, and tympanometry were performed at baseline, day 3-5, day 9-11, and at 5 weeks. Clinical outcome was assessed on day 9-11. Two-hundred eighty children were evaluable for efficacy (erythromycin group, 141; amoxicillin group, 139). Both groups were comparable with respect to demographic data and severity of disease at entry. Treatment was successful in 94% of the erythromycin-treated patients and in 96% of the amoxicillin-treated patients. Clinical outcome was statistically equivalent between groups within a range of 7 percentage points. Clinical recurrence was seen in eight erythromycin-treated children (5.7%) and in seven amoxicillin-treated children (5.0%) (P=0.81). Patients with bilateral disease at entry were at higher risk of unfavourable outcome, whereas age and presence/absence of otorrhea at entry were not associated with outcome. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded in eight (5.3%) of 151 erythromycin-treated patients and in 11 (7.3%) of 151 amoxicillin-treated patients. In this study in an outpatient setting in Germany, erythromycin estolate was as safe and effective as amoxicillin in the treatment of acute otitis media. Both drugs can be administered in a convenient twice-daily dosage schedule.

Equivalent efficacy and reduced occurrence of diarrhea from a new formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium (Augmentin) for treatment of acute otitis media in children

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy, in treating acute otitis media (AOM) in children, of a new formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium (Augmentin) oral suspension providing 45/6.4 mg/kg/day and administered twice daily (bid) for 5 and 10 days, respectively, with the safety and efficacy of the original formulation providing 40/10 mg/kg/day and administered three times daily (tid) for 10 days.

STUDY DESIGN

Eight hundred sixty-eight children ages 2 months to 12 years with AOM were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Stringent criteria were used for the diagnosis of AOM and for determinations of "cure" and "improvement." Subjects were reexamined on Days 12 to 14 and 32 to 38.

RESULTS

Among subjects whose treatment and follow-up conformed fully to protocol, the proportion of treatment successes (clinically cured or improved) on Days 12 to 14 was 78.8% (149 of 189) in the tid 10-day group, 86.5% (154 of 178) in the bid 10-day group and 71.1% (140 of 197) in the bid 5-day group. Corresponding values on Days 32 to 38 were 64.2% (95 of 148) in the tid 10-day group, 63.1% (94 of 149) in the bid 10-day group and 57.8% (93 of 161) in the bid 5-day group. None of the differences between the tid 10-day regimen and either of the 2 bid regimens were statistically significant, but the bid 10-day regimen was significantly more effective than the bid 5-day regimen in younger subjects. In the study population as a whole, results were similar to those in per protocol subjects. Overall the incidence of protocol-defined diarrhea was 26.7% (74 of 277) in the tid 10-day group, compared with 9.6% (27 of 280) in the bid 10-day group (P < 0.0001) and 8.7% (25 of 286) in the bid 5-day group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with the original formulation of Augmentin administered tid for 10 days in the treatment of AOM in children, the new formulation administered bid for 10 days provides at least equivalent efficacy and causes substantially less diarrhea. Administration for 5 days appears not to provide equivalent efficacy, but the difference appears limited to younger children and the margin of difference is small.