New bone formation in autologous membranous bone transplanted into the anterior abdominal wall

La cicatrisation des greffes osseuses

Bone graft healing involves an invasive process where vessels and cells penetrate the graft material to enable neoformation of bone. The origin of the material and its intrinsic properties and morphology are factors which affect its resorption and replacement. The first step involve formation of bone via the osteoconductive properties of the graft. For autologous bone, graft resorption enables secondarly release of preserved bone proteins, favoring a process of osteo-induction which contributes to remodelling and graft replacement by neoformed bone.

Parietal bone as graft material for maxillary sinus floor elevation: structure and remodeling of the donor and of recipient sites

Particulate parietal bone is used for maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure prior to dental implant placement. However, data on internal structure of the parietal bone and on graft remodeling and incorporation in the host bone are limited. We determined the structure and remodeling activities of 24 parietal bone specimens sampled at time of sinus grafting (T1 samples), and the amount and turnover of bone formed at the recipient site at time of implant placement (T2 samples, obtained 10 months after T1 samples, on average). In T1 samples, the outer cortex was 1.16+/-0.45 mm thick, had a typical haversian structure, and showed a low level of remodeling. In the cancellous portion of the samples, trabecular bone volume represented 52.8+/-10.3%. Bone remodeling was more active in the cancellous portion than in the cortical portion, but few osteoblasts and osteoclasts were seen. T2 samples consisted solely of trabecular bone, which occupied 49.4+/-18.4% of total sample volume. The boundary between new bone and the recipient bed was not discernible. Remnants of the graft particles were embedded within new bone, and showed signs of intense resorption. Bone remodeling was highly active, as shown by the presence of numerous osteoclasts resorbing new bone, together with thick osteoid seams and large osteoblasts. A loose cotton-like mineralized material was frequently observed in the marrow spaces; this acellular and non-collagenous material was strongly stained by toluidine blue, suggesting a glycoprotein nature. This study offers insights into cortical and trabecular bone structure and shows the low-level remodeling activity of parietal bone. About 10 months after grafting, the grafted chips were incorporated in new bone and almost completely resorbed. This high turnover may be beneficial for implant placement.

The matrix of endochondral bone differs from the matrix of intramembranous bone

Osseous tissue develops via two distinctly different processes: endochondral (EC) ossification and intramembranous (IM) ossification. The present study tests the hypothesis that each type of osseous tissue contains unique inducing factors for the promotion of cartilage and bone development. Previous work suggests that subcutaneous implants of demineralized EC and IM bone matrices both induce endochondral ossification. Thus, it concludes that the bone growth promotion properties of the respective matrices are very similar. As it was unclear to us why EC and IM bone powders should possess identical osteoinductive properties, we attempted to reproduce these results. We implanted EC (femoral) demineralized bone matrix (DBM), IM (frontal) DBM, or a mixture of the two into the ventral thoracic subcutaneous tissue of 12 to 15-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats. Morphological and radiolabeling techniques in this study demonstrated that implants of EC bone matrix induce bone formation via EC ossification in contrast to implants of IM bone matrix which do not induce EC ossification. Our findings suggest that the matrix of EC bone differs qualitatively from the matrix of IM bone due to their respective abilities to induce cartilage and/or bone formation. These observations differ from those previously reported possibly because our IM DBM preparations were not contaminated with tissues of endochondral origin. In current clinical practice, EC DBM allografts are often used to induce new bone formation in defects involving both IM and EC bone. We conclude that there may be clinical settings in which it would be more appropriate to replace bone originally formed via IM ossification with IM DBM rather than EC DBM.

Unusual fronto-orbital fractures in children

Two cases of unusual fronto-orbital fracture were encountered. In these cases, bone fragments containing orbital roof were detached from the wound in one piece. This injury was thought to occur by the application of tangential forces to the forehead. Laceration of the dura was noted, but there was no ocular or cerebral damage. This injury is thought to be characteristic in children. The mechanism of this injury is discussed.