Simultaneous construction of an internal and external nose in an infant with arhinia

Congenital Nasal Bones Agenesis: Report of a Rare Malformation

Congenital arhinia and hyporhinia are rare facial anomalies whose knowledge usually comes from case reports. The severity of each case described in literature is variable; it also depends on associated malformations too. Since the newborns are obligate nasal breathers, babies with arhinia or hyporhinia usually have respiratory distress and need airway stabilization. In addition, most of these children present difficulties in feeding and this impairment must be managed early. We describe an unusual case of partial congenital arhinia, the baby did not have other anomalies or any specific complication such as respiratory and feeding issues, so the major problem was the aesthetic and psychological issues for the family. Even if the neonatal course was uncomplicated, a coordinated approach of the pediatrician with the pediatric otolaryngologist, the geneticists and the neurosurgeons was necessary because the management of these malformations is always very complex; due to the lack of reports described in literature, an univocal management and also the best timing and technique for reconstructive surgery are still not defined.

Nasal Construction in Congenital Arhinia Due to Novel SMCHD1 Gene Variant

Arhinia, or congenital absence of the nose, is an exceedingly rare anomaly caused by pathogenic variants in the gene SMCHD1 . Arhinia exhibits unique reconstructive challenges, as the midface is deficient in skeletal and soft tissue structures. The authors present 2 related patients with arhinia who harbor a novel SMCHD1 gene variant and illustrate their surgical midface and nasal construction. Targeted sequencing was carried out on DNA samples from the 2 affected patients, 1 anosmic and 1 healthy parent, to identify variants in exons 3 to 13 of SMCHD1 . The affected patients and anosmic parent were found to have a novel SMCHD1 gene variant p.E473V. A staged surgical approach was applied. First, both patients underwent a LeFort II osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis to improve the projection of the midfacial segment, followed by tissue expansion of the forehead, and nasal construction with a forehead flap that was placed over a costochondral framework derived from rib cartilage. The novel gene variant could guide future investigations on genetic pathways and molecular processes that underly the physiological and pathologic development of the nose. Further investigations on the variable expressivity ranging from anosmia to arhinia could improve clinical genetic screens for risk stratification of individuals with anosmia on passing on arhinia to their children. Due to the exceptional rarity and complexity of congenital arhinia, most surgical approaches are developed on a single-case basis. This case series, albeit limited to 2 cases, is the largest pedigree of such cases in the literature. It highlights key principles of a staged approach to nasal construction in arhinia and discusses nuances and improvements learned between both patients. It subsequently offers an optimized guide to this surgical strategy.

Bosma Arhinia Microphthalmia Syndrome (BAMS): First Report from Vietnam

Bosma arhinia microphthalmia syndrome (BAMS) is a rare condition, with about 100 cases identified worldwide. It is characterized by nasal and ophthalmic abnormalities, as well as disturbances in puberty and sexual development. The cardinal sign is arhinia, though some cases have partial aplasia of the external nose. In addition, several reports have revealed abnormal brain structure, including changes to the olfactory bulbs. This case describes a 29-year-old female who has suffered from BAMS since birth. On presentation, she was noted to have congenital arhinia, bilateral microphthalmia, vision loss, mouth-breathing, an unclear speaking voice, a high arched or cleft palate, and a hypoplastic maxilla. Her paranasal sinuses were ossified and underdeveloped. This syndrome occurs rarely, both within Vietnam and worldwide. It is characterized by four major features: arrhinia, complete absence of the paranasal sinuses, eye defects, and absent sexual maturation. This case report describes the presentation of the disorder to improve otolaryngologists' understanding of BAMS. Criteria for diagnosis consist of arhinia, midface hypoplasia (with a hypoplastic maxilla), hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and normal intellectual abilities. Additional important findings are microphthalmia with or without coloboma, anosmia, maxillary hypoplasia, a high-arched palate, and absence of paranasal sinuses and olfactory bulbs.

Reconstruction of Congenital Arhinia With Stereolithographic Modeling: Case Correlate and Literature Review

Complete congenital arhinia is a rare defect of embryogenesis leading to the absence of the external nose and airway. We report our novel multistaged reconstructive approach and literature review. Nasal methyl methacrylate prosthesis was created from a stereolithographic model for use as a temporary prosthesis and tissue expander. Lefort 1 with cannulization was utilized for midface advancement and airway formation. External framework was reconstructed with bilateral conchal bowl cartilage and rib osteocartilagenous grafts. Patient was pleased with the aesthetics and had safe decannulation with the ability to breathe through the nose and airway.

Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications

Background

Tissue expansion is a versatile reconstructive technique providing well-vascularized local tissue. The current literature focuses largely on tissue expansion for breast reconstruction and in the context of burn and pediatric skin/soft tissue replacement; however, less traditional applications are also prevalent. The aim of this study was to systematically review the utilization of tissue expansion in such less well-characterized circumstances.

Methods

The authors conducted a systematic review of all publications describing non-breast applications of tissue expansion. Variables regarding expander specifications, expansion process, and complications were collected and further analyzed.

Results

A total of 565 publications were identified. Of these, 166 publications described tissue expansion for "less traditional" indications, which fell into 5 categories: ear reconstruction, cranioplasty, abdominal wall reconstruction, orthopedic procedures, and genital (penile/scrotal and vaginal/vulva) reconstruction. While lower extremity expansion is known to have high complication rates, tissue expander failure, infection, and exposure rates were in fact highest for penile/scrotal (failure: 18.5%; infection: 15.5%; exposure: 12.5%) and vaginal/vulva (failure: 20.6%; infection: 10.3%; exposure: 6.9%) reconstruction.

Conclusions

Tissue expansion enables index operations by providing additional skin before definitive reconstruction. Tissue expanders are a valuable option along the reconstructive ladder because they obviate the need for free tissue transfer. Although tissue expansion comes with inherent risk, aggregate outcome failures of the final reconstruction are similar to published rates of complications without pre-expansion. Thus, although tissue expansion requires a staged approach, it remains a valuable option in facilitating a variety of reconstructive procedures.

Surgical Technique for Nasal Cleft Repair

BACKGROUND

Congenital nasal cleft is a very rare yet challenging deformity to reconstruct. Atypical craniofacial clefts that involve the nasal ala are designated as number 1 and number 2 under the Tessier classification system. These clefts typically present as notches in the medial one-third of either nasal ala and may be accompanied by a malpositioned cartilaginous framework. Nasal clefts are smaller and far less common than familiar clefts of the lip and palate, but they pose equally challenging reconstructive planning.

METHODS

Our described technique relies on usage of existing nasal tissue near the cleft. Local tissue rearrangement using a laterally based rotational alar flap, a medially based triangular flap, and a nasal wall advancement flap restores normal anatomy and provides an aesthetically pleasing result.

RESULTS

Five children with isolated nasal cleft were treated by the senior author (A.M.) between 2010 and 2017. All patients presented with clefts of the soft tissue with no underlying cartilaginous involvement. There were no postoperative complications. Excellent aesthetic outcome was achieved in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Isolated nasal cleft can be properly corrected with the described procedure in a single stage and with optimal result.

The Case of the Missing Nose: Congenital Arhinia Case Presentation and Management Recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To discuss the presentation and management of infants with arhinia or congenital absence of the nose.

METHODS

This case report describes an infant with arhinia that was diagnosed prenatally. In addition to a discussion of the case, a review of the literature was completed to define appropriate postnatal work-up and management.

RESULTS

The patient is a term male infant, diagnosed with arhinia on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at 21-weeks gestational age. Upon birth, the patient was subsequently intubated, followed by tracheostomy due to complete nasal obstruction. Through a genetics evaluation, the patient was found to be heterozygous for the SMCHD1 gene, with hypomethylation at the D4Z4 locus. Plans for reconstruction will be based on future imaging and the development of any nasal patency, however, the patient's family plans to utilize a prosthetic nose until the patient is older.

CONCLUSION

Arhinia is a rare condition causing respiratory distress in the neonatal period. While stabilization of the airway is the first priority, further management is not clearly defined given the rarity of the malformation. This case discusses stabilization of the airway with a review of treatment and reconstructive options.

Early Pediatric Nasal Reconstruction Utilizing the Tagliacozzi Flap

The Tagliacozzi cross arm flap has been historically described for repair of large nasal defects. The authors report what we believe is the youngest case in modern literature of nasal reconstruction with a Tagliacozzi flap, in a 6-year-old girl. Due to her poor face and scalp skin quality, the more modern reconstructive options of a forehead flap or free tissue transfer were not deemed suitable. Two delay procedures and a complex splint were required to position the medial arm fasciocutaneous flap over the nasal construct. The arm was immobilized for 3 weeks to allow for vascularization of the recipient bed. The child successfully tolerated the splint. She has improved breathing and nasal contour.

Congenital Heminasal Aplasia: Clinical Picture, Radiological Findings, and Follow-up After Early Surgical Intervention

OBJECTIVE

This report presents an extremely rare case of heminasal aplasia or hemi-arhinia with only about 80 cases reported so far. The exact etiology and mechanism of development of heminasal aplasia are still unknown. Furthermore, the rarity of this anomaly makes its reconstruction a surgical challenge with a diversity and controversy on the timing and technique of such reconstructive procedures.

METHOD

Reconstruction was performed when the child was 3 months of age. The missing heminose was reconstructed by a superiorly based nasolabial flap.

RESULTS

On early follow-up visits, there was retraction of the flap. However, the parents were satisfied by the result to the degree that the girl did not show for follow up after 3 years of surgery until she is 13 years and even now her parents do not want any further surgery.

CONCLUSION

Early surgical reconstruction is recommended even if revisions may be needed later.

Design and manufacturing of a patient-specific nasal implant for congenital arhinia: Case report

Arhinia (congenital absence of the nose) is a congenital rare disease, which has been reported in less than 60 cases in the literature. It consists of the absence of external nose, nasal cavities and olfactory apparatus and is generally associated with midline defects, microphthalmia, blepharophimosis and hypotelorism. Aesthetic problems as well as associated functional anomalies can potentially impact on the development and interpersonal relationships of the child at a later stage in life.

Arhinia requires extensive management in early life in order to ensure airway patency and protection by means of tracheostomy, and to allow adequate pharyngeal and feeding function to the child. Aesthetic issues are managed with reconstructive surgery or an external prosthesis. There is no previous description in Literature of internal prosthetic devices used to sequentially shape soft tissues in complex reconstruction.

We present an example of design and manufacturing of a bespoke nose implant produced by means of 3D printing and directly assessed on-table by means of 3D surface scanning.

Heinrich von Pfalzpaint, Pioneer of Arm Flap Nasal Reconstruction in 1460, More Than a Century Before Tagliacozzi

Heinrich von Pfalzpaint (circa 1415-1465) was a Bavarian military surgeon of the Teutonic Order who treated more than 4000 casualties during the siege of Marienberg Fortress (1454-1457). In 1460, he reported "How to create a new nose if it has been chopped off and the dogs have eaten it" in his treatise on wound care Bündt-Ertznei. He used opium-soaked sponges for anesthesia, described the surgical extraction of bullets and cleft lip repair. Pfalzpaint would have been the first author to describe nasal reconstruction in Europe if his treatise had not been lost. Only 5 copies of his manuscript existed. One was rediscovered and printed in 1868. Pfalzpaint's technique for nasal reconstruction was performed in 2 stages using an undelayed skin flap from the upper arm, which was sutured to the nasal defect and the arm was bandaged to the head. After 8 to 10 days, he divided the pedicle; inset the flap; and fashioned the nasal dorsum, alae, and columella. Tagliacozzi described arm flap nasal reconstruction more than a century later in 1597. He used delayed skin flaps, with at least 6 operative stages over 4 months. Pfalzpaint was ahead of his time regarding his knowledge of wounds, insistence on surgical cleanliness, and his technically easier arm flap rhinoplasty, compared with Tagliacozzi. Pfalzpaint, who is rarely referenced in the literature, should be remembered as a great pioneer of reconstructive surgery in Europe.

Bosma arhinia microphthalmia syndrome: Clinical report and review of the literature

Bosma arhinia microphthalmia syndrome (Bosma syndrome)(OMIM 603457) is a congenital condition characterized by microphthalmia with coloboma, arhinia and endocrine findings in the setting of normal intelligence and brain structure. This condition is quite rare with fewer than 50 case reports and series. Although pathogenesis is presumed to be genetic, the cause remains unknown. We report an individual with Bosma syndrome who had bilateral colobomatous microphthalmia, arhinia, high arched palate, mild ear malformations, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism requiring growth hormone treatment in childhood, and normal intelligence. Clinical evaluation was significant for a geometrically abnormal aorta with effacement of the sinotubular ridge, a finding not previously reported in this condition. An MRI revealed absent olfactory bulbs. Suggested criteria for diagnosis of Bosma should include arhinia, hypoplastic maxilla, normal cognition, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in males.

Use of distraction osteogenesis in arrhinia

Nasal malformations such as hemiarrhinia and arrhinia have a very low incidence, although many treatment protocols have been described. In this article, we describe 2 surgical techniques to treat arrhinia depending on the age at the beginning of treatment. In our practice, we use Le Fort III osteotomy with distraction osteogenesis as a pillar of the reconstruction because it allows to improve anteroposterior and vertical projections of the midface, giving a proper platform for nasal reconstruction, decreasing the number of interventions. We report a patient with a hemiarrhinia who has completed appropriate reconstruction results and a patient with total arrhinia in whom the distraction was achieved to create a nasal bone support and improve midface projection.

Reconstruction of Nasal Cleft Deformities Using Expanded Forehead Flaps: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Reconstruction of the nasal clefts is a challenging task considering the nasal anatomic complexity and their possible association with craniofacial defects. The reconstruction of these defects needs extensive amounts of soft tissue that warrant the use of forehead flaps. Often presence of cranial defects and low hairline compromise the amount of tissue available for reconstruction warrenting tissue expansion.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of tissue expansion in reconstruction of congenital nasal clefts.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

9 patients with congenital nasal clefts involving multiple sub units were taken up for nasal reconstruction with expanded forehead flaps. The average amount of expansion needed was 200 ml. The reconstruction was performed in 3 stages.

RESULTS

Expanded forehead flaps proved to be best modality for reconstruction providing the skin cover needed for ala, columella and dorsum with minimal scarring at the donor site.

CONCLUSION

Expansion of the forehead flap is a viable option for multiple sub unit reconstruction in congenital nasal cleft deformities.

Congenital arhinia: A rare case

Patient: Male, 4 months

Final Diagnosis: Congenital arhynia

Symptoms: Absence of the nose

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Pediatrics and Noenatology • Genetics

The Arrhinias

The Arrhinias consist of three groups of malformations: the Total Arrhinias (T-AR), the Hemi-Arrhinias (H-AR, often called Hemi-Nasal Ageneses) and the Proboscis Lateralis (P.L.) This work deals with 51 cases of Arrhinias gathered within 35 years (8 T-AR, 25 H-AR, and 18 P.L): their anatomy, clinical signs, and some indications for treatment; but it does not extend to a discussion for their etiopathology. However, the T-AR and the H-AR represent ageneses, whereas the P.L represents a dysgenesis. The anomalies common to the three groups of Arrhinias are many: the agenesis of the nasal bones, the telecanthus which is often in contrast to the hypo-telorbitism, the obstruction of the naso-lacrimal passage, the ectasia of the lacrimal sac with an erosion of the inferomedial angle of the orbit, the hypopneumatization of the maxillary sinus and a small maxilla, the unerrupted canines, the flattened fronto-nasal process, the obliteration of the cribriform plate, the dysplasia in the root of the eyebrows, the transverse hypoplasia of the upper lip, the frequency of microphthalmia, colobomas of the iris and nystagmus. Cleft lip and palate are frequently associated with the Arrhinias (see Table I) and also other facial malformations, but in different proportions, according to groups. They are: cryptophtalmias, eyelid coloboma, fronto-orbital encephalocele, agenesis of the premaxilla or prolabium, microtia. (See Table II) The basic principles of the treatment are the following: In the T-AR, a nasal passage should initially be bored through the maxilla, or there should be a displacement of the two halves of the mid-face by a procedure known as "facial bipartition". This nasal passage should be epithelialized and maintained wide open to the pharynx until the nasal construction. In the H-AR, it is sufficient to create an epithelialized passage through the curtain of bone where one would expect the pyriform rim to be and carry this passage through the septum into the contralateral nasal airway. Then, regardless of the type of arrhinia, the nasal construction is carried out with a forehead flap and bone grafts. The first grafts are either iliac or tibial, and subsequent ones are generally outer table calvarial grafts harvested from the parietal region. Later, there are further procedures: a maxillary advancement, a lengthening of the central midface, the final stages of the nasal construction, the elevation of the medial canthus, and the restoration of the infero-medial angle of the orbit (but rarely an efficient lacrimal drainage). The earliest stage for surgery can be debated. A strategy for treatment is suggested. Finally, 20 brief comments are made, which are as much questions asked concerning the three groups of arrhinia and their relationship with other centro-facial and latero-facial malformations.

Management of a case of arhinia

Arhinia is a rare condition characterised by the congenital absence of nasal structures, with different patterns of presentation, and often associated with other craniofacial or somatic anomalies. To date, about 30 surviving cases have been reported. We report the case of a female patient aged 6 years, who underwent internal and external nose reconstruction using a staged procedure: a nasal airway was obtained through maxillary osteotomy and ostectomy, and lined with a local skin flap and split-thickness skin grafts; then the external nose was reconstructed with an expanded frontal flap, armed with an autogenous rib framework.

Congenital arhinia: molecular-genetic analysis of five patients

Congenital arhinia, complete absence of the nose, is an extremely rare anomaly with unknown cause. To our knowledge, a total of 36 cases have been reported, but there has been no molecular-genetic study on this anomaly. We encountered a sporadic case of congenital arhinia associated with a de novo chromosomal translocation, t(3;12)(q13.2;p11.2). This led us to analyze the patient by BAC-based FISH for translocation breakpoints and whole-genome array CGH for other possible deletions/duplications in the genome. We found in this patient an approximately 19 Mb deletion spanning from 3q11.2 to 3q13.31 but no disruption of any gene(s) at the other breakpoint, 12p11.2. As the deleted segment at 3q was a strong candidate region containing the putative arhinia gene, we also performed the array CGH in four other arhinia patients with normal karyotypes, as well as mutation analysis of two genes, COL8A1 and CPOX, selected among hundreds of genes located to the deleted region, because they are expressed during early stages of human craniofacial development. However, in the four patients, there were no copy number aberrations in the region examined or no mutations in the two genes. Although our study failed to identify the putative arhinia gene, the data may become a clue to unravel the underlying mechanism of arhinia.

[The rare malformation of nasal aplasia]

BACKGROUND

After presenting two sisters with the rare form of congenital arrhinia, this syndrome is reviewed, an explanation of the pathogenesis is offered and the therapeutic options of the functional and aesthetic reconstruction are discussed.

DISCUSSION

In cases of congenital arrhinia different degrees of respiratory distress, cyanotic episodes, and impaired food intake are described. Therefore after birth respiration and food intake need to be monitored to alleviate the situation through intubation or tracheotomy. The following conclusions could be made based on the literature overview. Little is known about the pathophysiology and a great variety of therapeutic interventions and reconstruction solutions with a wide spectrum of complications are described. Due to the numerous forms of complications, which need to be compared with the reconstructive results, indications for surgical reconstruction of the airway and plastic reconstruction of the nose during childhood must be defined very stringently.

CONCLUSION

One method to achieve a satisfactory plastic result is with an osseointegrated prosthesis. This facial prosthesis can be inserted without complications and can guarantee an adequate result, whereas no impairment of maxillofacial development was noted.

Arhinia

We report here a case of arhinia with its complete manifestation, which is a very rare congenital abnormality. The newborn had complete absence of external nose with that area being totally flat and firm on palpation. A tracheostomy was performed on this child as the parents insisted on early discharge from the hospital without any reconstruction.

Simultaneous and symmetrical reconstruction of heminose and restoration of nasal airway in congenital absence of heminose

Congenital absence of heminose is an extremely rare anomaly. Reconstruction of full thickness defects of the nose requires lining, support and cover. Reconstruction of congenital absence of heminose has an additional requirement of reconstruction of the nasal airway. Simultaneous reconstruction of the heminose and internal nasal passage has not been reported earlier. In a case of congenital absence of heminose, reconstruction of the heminose and internal nasal passage was done simultaneously by using expanded forehead tissue and a nasolabial flap. The nasolabial flap is robust and supports the alar margin without any need of cartilage support. The bulk of subcutaneous tissue it carries lies on the outerside of nostril and, therefore, it does not obstruct the nasal opening. This was covered by expanded forehead tissue, which got thinned out due to tissue expansion, thus achieving symmetry with other half of nose. Skin of the nasolabial flap lines nasal passage thereby avoiding the need of splintage of nasal airway which is required if nostril is lined by split skin graft.

Vertical facial distraction in the treatment of arhinia

Arhinia is a rare congenital malformation characterized by lack of the formation of external and internal nasal structures. Restricted midfacial growth is secondary to the loss of the midfacial growth centers. Staged reconstruction of the nasal passage and external nose is required. Vertical distraction osteogenesis is a beneficial step in the overall reconstructive program. This provides for additional bone and soft tissue for both improved aesthetic facial proportions and later surgical interventions.

Congenital nasal anomalies: a classification scheme

The purpose of this work was to develop a simple yet comprehensive classification scheme dedicated to congenital nasal anomalies. To date, no such classification system has been proposed and widely used. A 22-year retrospective review was performed. Two hundred sixty-one patients with congenital nasal anomalies were identified. From this extensive database, a systematic morphogenic classification system was devised. Congenital nasal deformities were classified into four categories. Type I, hypoplasia and atrophy, represents paucity, atrophy, or underdevelopments of skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, cartilage, and/or bone. Type II, hyperplasia and duplications, representing anomalies of excess tissue, ranging from duplications of parts to complete multiples, are categorized here. In the type III category, clefts, the comprehensive and widely utilized Tessier classification of craniofacial clefts is applied. Type IV deformities consist of neoplasms and vascular anomalies. Both benign and malignant neoplasms are found in this category.

Congenital arhinia

Congenital absence of the nose or arhinia is a rare defect of embryogenesis, often associated with other anomalies. It is potentially a life-threatening condition and requires the presence of a highly skilled neonatal resuscitation team at the time of delivery. The associated anomalies often have a significant impact on the immediate as well as long-term outcome of the neonate. Parental counselling is thus vital and a multidisciplinary team approach is required to optimise the neonatal outcome. A neonate with congenital arhinia is reported and the literature reviewed to suggest guidelines for the management of such cases.

Composite grafting and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in pediatric nasal tip reconstruction after avulsive dog-bite injury

It is estimated that more than four million people are bitten by dogs in the United States each year. The majority of such injuries are minor, and their treatment does not usually require surgical consultation. However, the authors report a case in which a Rottweiler inflicted a mutilating nasal tip/alar rim avulsion on a 5-year-old boy. They report their experience with immediate reconstruction of the nasal defect using a large ipsilateral auricular cartilage composite graft (crus helix). Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (without sedation or anesthesia) was used to maximize the stimulus for graft revascularization. Reconstructive goals were achieved while avoiding the need for a central facial donor site defect.

Prenatal diagnosis of total arhinia

Complete or total arhinia, in which there is absence of the soft tissue of the nose, is extremely rare. The embryological origin of the defect is thought to be maldevelopment of the paired nasal placodes. Available neonatal case descriptions have reported the frequent coexistence of other facial anomalies. This report is the first to describe the antenatal diagnosis of total arhinia confirmed after delivery. Sonographic views of the fetal profile, showing an absence of the nose led to consideration of the diagnosis.

Total external and internal construction in arhinia

This case report relates to the surgical treatment of arhinia in a 6-year-old child. The external nose was constructed during the first stage with a forehead flap and a triangular rib graft. The nasal cavities were drilled out and lined during the second stage. In a third stage, the cavities were amplified, and silicone tubes were introduced for at least 1 year.