Composite tissue transplantation: more science and patience needed

Adipose-derived stromal cells modulating composite allotransplant survival is correlated with B cell regulation in a rodent hind-limb allotransplantation model

Background

Our previous studies demonstrated that adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASCs) have immunomodulatory effects that prolong allograft survival in a rodent hind-limb allotransplant model. In this study, we investigated whether the effects of immunomodulation by ASCs on allograft survival are correlated with B cell regulation.

Methods

B cells isolated from splenocytes were cocultured with ASCs harvested from adipose tissue from rodent groin areas for in vitro experiments. In an in vivo study, hind-limb allotransplantation from Brown-Norway to Lewis rats was performed, and rats were treated with ASCs combined with short-term treatment with anti-lymphocyte serum (ALS)/cyclosporine (CsA) as immunosuppressants. Peripheral blood and transplanted tissue were collected for further analysis.

Result

An in vitro study revealed that ASCs significantly suppressed lipopolysaccharide-activated B cell proliferation and increased the percentage of Bregs. The levels of immunoregulatory cytokines, such as TGF-β1 and IL-10, were significantly increased in supernatants of stimulated B cells cocultured with ASCs. The in vivo study showed that treatment with ASCs combined with short-term ALS/CsA significantly reduced the B cell population in alloskin tissue, increased the proportion of circulating CD45Ra⁺/Foxp3⁺ B cells, and decreased C4d expression in alloskin.

Conclusion

ASCs combined with short-term immunosuppressant treatment prolong allograft survival and are correlated with B cell regulation, C4d expression and the modulation of immunoregulatory cytokines.

Immunomodulation in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: What Is the Role for Adipose-Derived Stem Cells?

Hand and face transplants are becoming increasingly common, recording progressively more penile, uterus, abdominal wall, and allotransplantation cases reported worldwide. Despite current protocols allow long-term survival of the allografts, the ultimate goal of donor-specific tolerance has not been achieved yet. In fact, the harmful adverse effects related to the lifelong administration of immunosuppressive agents are the main drawbacks for vascularized composite allotransplantations. Research is very active in investigating alternative methods to induce greater tolerance while minimizing toxicity. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) represent promising cell therapies for immunomodulation in preclinical and clinical settings. Their clinical appeal is due to their easy harvest in large quantities through a noninvasive and well-accepted approach; they may well promote donor-specific tolerance and potentially reduce immunosuppression. Several experimental studies exist, but lacking review articles reporting current evidence. This work proposes a literature review on the immunomodulatory role of ASCs in vascularized composite allotransplantations. In vitro and in vivo evidence will be summarized. The role that cell passaging and upstream progenitors-the so-called spheroid ASCs-may play in modulating the immune response will also be discussed. Finally, this article will summarize current knowledge on biodistribution, migration, and homing of injected stem cells. This review may well provide useful information for preclinical and clinical studies, aiming at a breakthrough for donor-specific tolerance.

Recipient Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Enhance Recipient Cell Engraftment and Prolong Allotransplant Survival in a Miniature Swine Hind-Limb Model

Donor mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could prolong vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) survival in our previous studies. However, recipient adipose tissue is easier to harvest than donor tissue for preconditioning modulation. Hence, this study investigated the efficacy of recipient autologous adipose-derived stem cells (rADSCs) for VCA survival. The heterotopic hind-limb transplantation from female donor to male recipient was performed in outbred miniature swine. Group I ( n = 6) was untreated controls. Group II ( n = 4) obtained rADSCs infusions (given on weeks 0, +1, +2, and +3). Group III ( n = 4) obtained tacrolimus (FK506, weeks 0 to +4). Group IV ( n = 8) received irradiation (IR; day -1), FK506 (weeks 0 to +4), and rADSC infusions (weeks 0, +1, +2, and +3). The results revealed treatment with multiple injections of rADSCs along with IR and FK506 resulted in a statistically significant increase in allograft survival. The percentage of CD4⁺/CD25⁺/Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells were significantly increased in the rADSC-IR-FK506 group as compared to controls. Analysis of recipient peripheral blood revealed that transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) was significantly increased in the rADSC-IR-FK506 group. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and immunohistochemical staining showed recipient sex-determining region of Y (SRY) chromosome gene expression existed in donor allotissues in the rADSC-IR-FK506 group. These results indicate that rADSCs in addition to IR and transient immunosuppressant could prolong allotransplant survival, modulate T-cell regulation, and enhance recipient cell engraftment into the allotransplant tissues.

The Ethics of Hand Transplantation: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

We conducted a systematic review to document ethical concerns regarding human upper extremity (UE) allotransplantation and how these concerns have changed over time.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of 5 databases to find manuscripts addressing ethical concerns related to UE allotransplantation. Inclusion criteria were papers that were on the topic of UE allotransplantation, and related ethical concerns, written in English. We extracted and categorized ethical themes under the 4 principles of bioethics: Autonomy, Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, and Justice. We assessed theme frequency by publication year using Joinpoint regression, analyzing temporal trends, and estimating annual percent change.

RESULTS

We identified 474 citations; 49 articles were included in the final analysis. Publication years were 1998 to 2015 (mean, 3 publications/y; range, 0-7 publications/y). Nonmaleficence was most often addressed (46 of 49 papers; 94%) followed by autonomy (36 of 49; 74%), beneficence (35 of 49; 71%), and justice (31 of 49; 63%). Of the 14 most common themes, only "Need for More Research/Data" (nonmaleficence) demonstrated a significant increase from 1998 to 2002.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper extremity transplantation is an appealing reconstructive option for patients and physicians. Its life-enhancing (vs life-saving) nature and requirement for long-term immunosuppression have generated much ethical debate. Availability of human data has influenced ethical concerns over time. Our results indicate that discussion of ethical issues in the literature increased following publication of UE transplants and outcomes as well as after meetings of national societies and policy decisions by regulatory agencies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Because UE transplantation is not a life-saving procedure, much ethical debate has accompanied its evolution. It is important for UE surgeons considering referring patients for evaluation to be aware of this discussion to fully educate patients and help them make informed treatment decisions.

Hand Transplantation: Evolution of a Personal Outlook

The field of vascularized composite allotransplantation-combining advances in reconstructive surgery, transplantation, and immunology-offers great promise for patients with heretofore unsolvable problems. In the last 30 years, hand transplantation has progressed through the phases of being a research subject, a controversial clinical procedure, a more widely accepted and expanding field, and now a promising endeavor undergoing refined indications. Although many lessons have been learned, few procedures in the author's experience have been as life-transformative in restoring the body image, motor and sensory functions, activities of daily living, and personal autonomy as successful hand transplantation.

The utility of hand transplantation in hand amputee patients

PURPOSE

To measure the desirable health outcome, termed utility, and the expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained with hand composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) using hand amputee patients and the general public.

METHODS

Using the standard gamble (SG) and time trade-off (TTO) techniques, utilities were obtained from 30 general public participants and 12 amputee patients. The health utility and net QALYs gained or lost with transplantation were computed. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for the effects of lifelong immunosuppression on the life expectancy of transplant recipients. Higher scores represent greater utility.

RESULTS

Hand amputation mean health utility as measured by the SG and TTO methods, respectively, was 0.72 and 0.80 for the general public and 0.69 and 0.70 for hand amputees. In comparison, hand CTA mean health utility was 0.74 and 0.82 for the general public and 0.83 and 0.86 for amputees. Hand CTA imparted an expected gain of 0.9 QALYs (SG and TTO) in the general public and 7.0 (TTO) and 7.8 (SG) QALYs in hand amputees. A loss of at least 1.7 QALYs was demonstrated when decreasing the life expectancy in the sensitivity analysis in the hand amputee group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand amputee patients did not show a preference toward hand CTA with its inherent risks. With this procedure being increasingly adopted worldwide, the benefits must be carefully weighed against the risks of lifelong immunosuppressive therapy. This study does not show clear benefit to advocate hand CTA.

Mesenchymal stem cells as immunomodulators in a vascularized composite allotransplantation

Vascularized composite allotransplantations (VCAs) are not routinely performed for tissue reconstruction because of the potentially harmful adverse effects associated with lifelong administration of immunosuppressive agents. Researchers have been eagerly seeking alternative methods that circumvent the long-term use of immunosuppressants. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) show promise as an immunomodulatory therapeutic agent and are currently being tested in preclinical and clinical settings as therapies for autoimmune disorders or transplant rejection. The mechanisms by which MSCs modulate the immune response are still under thorough investigation, but these most likely involve expression of local factors influencing T-cell regulation, modulation of cytokine expression (e.g., IL-10, TGF-β, TNF-α, INF-γ, etc.), and interactions with dendritic or antigen presenting cells. In this paper, we summarize the current understanding of immunomodulation achieved by MSC therapies and introduce a possible outline for future clinical applications in VCA.

Prolongation of composite tissue allotransplant survival by treatment with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells is correlated with T-cell regulation in a swine hind-limb model

BACKGROUND

Recently published reports indicate that treatment with mesenchymal stem cells combined with bone marrow transplantation could prolong survival after composite tissue allotransplantation. This study investigated whether bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells combined with irradiation and short-term immunosuppressant therapy, but without bone marrow transplantation, could prolong composite tissue allotransplantation survival. Correlation with regulatory T-cell populations was also evaluated in a swine hind-limb model.

METHODS

Heterotopic hind-limb transplantation was performed in outbred miniature swine. Group I (n = 4) was the untreated control. Group II (n = 3) received mesenchymal stem cells alone (on days -1, 3, 7, 14, and 21). Group III (n = 5) received cyclosporine A (on days 0 through 28). Group IV (n = 3) received irradiation (on day -1), mesenchymal stem cells (on days 1, 7, 14, and 21), and cyclosporine A (on days 0 to 28). Swine viability and signs of allograft rejection were monitored postoperatively. Histopathologic changes in allografts were examined. The expression and localization of CD4+/CD25+ and CD4+/FoxP3+ T cells were assessed using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Treatment with mesenchymal stem cells along with irradiation and cyclosporine A resulted in significant increases in allograft survival as compared with other groups (>120 days; p = 0.018). Histologic examination revealed the lowest degree of rejection in grafted skin and interstitial muscle layers in the mesenchymal stem cell/irradiation/cyclosporine A group. Flow cytometric analysis revealed a significant increase in the percentage of CD4+/CD25+ and CD4+/FoxP3+ T cells in both the blood and graft in the mesenchymal stem cell/irradiation/cyclosporine A group.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that prolonged survival after composite tissue allotransplantation induced by treatment with mesenchymal stem cells combined with irradiation/cyclosporine A is correlated with regulatory T cells.

Hand transplantation and vascularized composite tissue allografts in orthopaedics and traumatology

Composite tissue allograft (CTA) is defined as heterologous transplantation of a complex comprising skin and subcutaneous, neurovascular and mesenchymal tissue. Such techniques allow complex reconstruction using matched tissue, without donor site morbidity. The potential indications in orthopaedics-traumatology could in the future be more frequent than the present indications of heart, lung, liver, kidney and pancreas transplantation. International clinical experience clearly demonstrates the feasibility of CTA, both surgically and immunologically. However, immunosuppression remains indispensable, exposing the patient to risks that are not acceptable for purely functional surgery, except in very particular indications. The main hope for the future lies in induction of graft-specific tolerance.

An economic analysis of hand transplantation in the United States

BACKGROUND

Hand transplantation has received international attention in recent years; however, the economic impact of this innovative treatment is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the utility and estimate the costs of hand transplantation and the use of hand prostheses for forearm amputations.

METHODS

One hundred medical students completed a time trade-off survey to assess the utilities of single and double hand transplantation and the use of hand prostheses. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated for each outcome to create decision trees. Cost data for medical care were estimated based on Medicare fee schedules using the Current Procedural Terminology code for forearm replantation. The cost of immunosuppressive therapy was estimated based on the wholesale price of drugs. The incremental cost-utility ratio was calculated from the differences in costs and utilities between transplantation and prosthesis. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

For unilateral hand amputation, prosthetic use was favored over hand transplantation (30.00 QALYs versus 28.81 QALYs; p = 0.03). Double hand transplantation was favored over the use of prostheses (26.73 QALYs versus 25.20 QALYs; p = 0.01). The incremental cost-utility ratio of double transplantation when compared with prostheses was $381,961/QALY, exceeding the traditionally accepted cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Prosthetic adaption is the dominant strategy for unilateral hand amputation. For bilateral hand amputation, double hand transplantation exceeds the societally acceptable threshold for general adoption. Improvements in immunosuppressive strategies may change the incremental cost-utility ratio for hand transplantation.

Mesenchymal stem cells prolong composite tissue allotransplant survival in a swine model

BACKGROUND

This study investigated whether mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) combined with bone marrow transplantation (BMT), irradiation, or short-term immunosuppressant therapy could prolong composite tissue allotransplant survival in a swine hind-limb model.

METHODS

Heterotopic hind-limb transplantation was performed in outbred miniature swine. Group I (n=5) was the untreated control. Group II (n=3) received MSCs alone (given on days -1, +3, +7, +14, +21). Group III (n=6) received cyclosporine A (CsA days 0 to +28). Group IV (n=4) received preconditioning irradiation (day -1), BMT (day +1), and CsA (days 0 to +28). Group V (n=5) received irradiation (day -1), BMT (day +1), CsA (days 0 to +28), and MSCs (days +1, +7,+14). The expression and localization of CD4/CD25 T cells and MSCs were assessed using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The allografts survival with MSCs alone revealed a significant prolongation, when compared with the controls (P=0.02). Allografts with CsA treatment exhibited delayed rejection. Irradiation and BMT-CsA treatment revealed no significant allograft survival benefit when compared with the CsA treatment group, but graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was evident. However, combination of MSCs-BMT-CsA treatment demonstrated significant prolongation of allograft survival (>200 days, P<0.001) and no signs of GVHD with the lowest degree of rejection in the allo-skin and interstitial muscle layers. The CD4/CD25 regulatory-like T-cell expression in the circulating blood and allo-skin significantly increased in the MSC-BMT-CsA group. Examination of bromodeoxyuridine-labeled MSCs revealed donor MSC engraftment into the recipient and donor skin and the recipient liver parenchymal tissue.

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that the regulatory activity of MSCs on T cells and GVHD might contribute to significant prolongation of composite tissue allotransplant survival in the MSC-BMT-CsA treatment.

Alloantigen-pulsed host dendritic cells induce T-cell regulation and prolong allograft survival in a rat model of hindlimb allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Composite tissue allotransplantation is restricted due to the risks presented by long-term therapeutic immunosuppression. This study is conducted to investigate whether treatment with recipient immature dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with donor alloantigens can prolong allograft survival and induce T-cell regulation in a rodent model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Orthotopic hindlimb transplants from Brown-Norway (RT1(n)) to Lewis (RT1(1)) rats were performed (day 0). DCs were propagated from the recipient bone marrow and pulsed with the donor alloantigen lysate. Group 1 (control group) did not receive any treatment. Groups 2 and 3 received cyclosporine A (CsA) at a concentration of 10 and 16 mg.kg(-1).day(-1), respectively, on days 0-20 following composite tissue allotransplantation. Group 4 received antilymphocyte serum (i.p. administered 4 d before and 1 d after transplantation) therapy. Group 5 received combined treatment with CsA (10 mg.kg(-1).day(-1), days 0-20) and donor alloantigen-pulsed recipient DCs (i.v. administered on days 7, 14, and 21). Group 6 received combined treatment with CsA (10 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) on days 0-20), antilymphocyte serum (administered i.p. 4 d before and 1 d after transplantation), and DCs (administered i.v. on days 7, 14, and 21). Graft rejection was defined as epidermolysis/desquamation of the donor skin. The mixed lymphocyte reaction was performed to determine the donor T-cell reactivity. Tissue samples were biopsied to analyze the histological changes, and flow cytometry was performed to quantify the donor T-cells.

RESULTS

Allograft survival was significantly prolonged (>200 d) in Group 6 when compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). The mixed lymphocyte reaction performed for Group 6 revealed hyporesponsiveness of the T-cells to donor alloantigens. Flow cytometric analysis in Group 6 revealed a significant increase in the percentage of CD4(+)/CD25(+) and CD4(+)/foxP3(+) T-cells expression, and significant increase in the percentage of donor cells (RT1(n)) in the recipient peripheral blood. Immunohistochemical staining of allo-skin revealed a significant increase in the proportion of CD25(+) cells in the subcutaneous and dermis layers in Group 6, as compared to other groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with donor alloantigen-pulsed recipient immature DCs in combination with transient immunosuppression prolongs allograft survival and induced tolerance by inducing T-cell hyporesponsiveness to donor alloantigens and increasing the CD4(+)/CD25(+) T-cell population.

The Surgeon's Role and Responsibility in Facial Tissue Allograft Transplantation

Facial composite tissue allograft (CTA) transplantation represents a novel frontier in the reconstruction of the human form. The face plays a central role in human interactions, with significant social ramifications resulting from facial disfigurement. The surgeon performing facial tissue transplantation bears additional responsibilities unique to plastic and reconstructive procedures. Reconstruction by facial tissue transplantation may immensely improve quality of life, provided the process of patient selection is conspicuous and appropriate and allograft rejection is prevented. However, facial CTA transplantation represents an elective procedure to reconstruct a non-life-threatening defect. Given the potential for organ failure, opportunistic infection, and malignancy resulting from long-term immunosuppression, the surgeon must carefully weigh the balance of risk to benefit for the individual patient. Pioneering surgeons developing this procedure must thoroughly evaluate its impact as it relates to clinical and social issues.

Cellular Therapies for Prolongation of Composite Tissue Allograft Transplantation

Complex musculoskeletal defects resulting from cancer, congenital absence, and trauma represent a unique reconstructive challenge. Autologous tissue is often unavailable to reconstruct these deformities. Composite tissue allograft transplantation represents a unique solution for these clinical problems. Face, hand, or limb transplants can be performed in a single procedure. However, the use of chronic nonspecific systemic immunosuppression can lead to side effects such as drug toxicity, opportunistic infections, and malignancies. This article explores various cell-based therapies that represent promising modalities to reduce chronic immunosuppression and alter the risk/benefit ratios for the prospect of composite tissue allograft transplantation.

Hand transplantation: the state-of-the-art

The feasibility of hand transplantation has been demonstrated, both surgically and immunologically. Levels of immunosuppression comparable to regimens used in solid organ transplantation are proving sufficient to prevent graft loss. Many patients have achieved discriminative sensibility and recovery of intrinsic muscle function. In addition to restoration of function, hand transplantation offers considerable psychological benefits. The recipient's pre-operative psychological status, his motivation and his compliance with the intense rehabilitation programme are key issues. While the induction of graft specific tolerance represents a hope for the future, immunosuppression currently remains necessary and carries significant risks. Hand transplantation should, therefore, only be considered a therapeutic option for a carefully selected group of patients.

Risk Acceptance in Laryngeal Transplantation

PURPOSE

Advancements in the fields of head and neck surgery and immunology have paved the way for new quality of life-improving procedures such as larynx transplantation. To quantitatively assess the risks versus benefits in larynx transplantation, we used a questionnaire-based survey (Louisville Instrument For Transplantation [LIFT]) to measure the degree of risk individuals are willing to accept to receive different types of transplantation procedures.

METHODS

The LIFT contains 237 standardized questions incorporating standard gamble and time tradeoff outcome measures as well as questions assessing body image perception, depression, self-esteem, optimism, socially desirable responding, and demographics. Respondents were questioned on the extent to which they would trade off specific numbers of life-years, or sustain other costs, in exchange for receiving seven different types of transplant procedures. For this study, we questioned 243 individuals in three study populations with differing life experiences: healthy individuals, organ transplant recipients, and laryngectomees.

RESULTS

All populations questioned perceived risks differently based on their varied life experiences and would accept differing degrees of risk for the different transplant procedures. Organ transplant recipients were the most risk-tolerant group, whereas laryngectomees were the least risk-tolerant.

CONCLUSIONS

By questioning individuals with life experiences directly relevant to the risks and benefits associated with larynx transplantation, this study provides an empiric basis for assessing risk versus benefit in this new quality of life-improving procedure.

Investigation of risk acceptance in hand transplantation

PURPOSE

Twenty-four hands have been transplanted in 18 individuals and clinicians continue to debate whether the risks justify the benefits in these procedures. To assess quantitatively the risks versus benefits in hand transplantation we used a validated instrument (Louisville Instrument for Transplantation) to measure the degree of risk individuals are willing to accept to receive different types of transplantation procedures.

METHODS

The Louisville Instrument for Transplantation contains 237 standardized questions that incorporate modified standard gamble and time trade-off outcome measures and questions that assess body image perception, depression, self-esteem, optimism, socially desirable responding, and demographics. Respondents were questioned on the extent to which they would trade off specific numbers of life-years or sustain other costs in exchange for receiving 7 different transplantation procedures. For this study we questioned 227 individuals in 4 study populations with differing life experiences: healthy individuals, organ transplant recipients, upper-extremity amputee patients, and lower-extremity amputee patients.

RESULTS

All populations questioned perceived risk similarly despite their differing life experiences and would accept differing degrees of risk for the different transplantation procedures. Organ transplant recipients were the most risk-tolerant group whereas upper-extremity amputee patients were the most risk adverse, even when considering a single hand transplant. All groups that were questioned would accept a higher degree of risk to receive a double versus a single hand transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

By questioning individuals who have experienced directly the risks of immunosuppression and those who could benefit from hand transplantation, this study presents an empiric basis for assessing risk versus benefit in this procedure.

Composite tissue allotransplantation and reconstructive surgery: first clinical applications

OBJECTIVE

To review the first clinical cases of composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) for reconstructive surgery and to discuss the outcome of and indications for these procedures in the context of chronic immunosuppression.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The first human hand transplant was performed in 1998. This procedure, as well as other composite tissue transplants, offers the potential for correcting untreatable large tissue defects. However, concerns remain regarding obligatory chronic immunosuppression and long-term functional results.

METHODS

All the CTAs performed in humans that have been published or documented were reviewed. The preexisting clinical conditions and surgical procedures and the immunosuppressive therapy are described. The functional results and the complications or side effects of the treatment are detailed.

RESULTS

Vascularized tendons (two cases), vascularized femoral diaphyses (three cases), knees (five cases), hands (four bilateral and seven unilateral cases), larynx (one case), and nonvascularized peripheral nerves (seven cases) have been transplanted in humans in the past decade. Rejection was prevented in most cases without difficulty. Early results are encouraging, particularly for hand and larynx transplants, but will need to be evaluated in the long term and in a larger number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CTA holds great potential for reconstructive surgery but is at present restricted by the risks of chronic immunosuppression and uncertain long-term results.

A position statement in support of hand transplantation

The scientific basis for human trials of hand transplantation was both experimental and clinical. Prolonged survival of limb transplants was achieved in small and large animals by using novel immunosuppressive drugs. Further, all tissue components of the hand (skin, muscle, tendon, nerve, bone, and joint) were individually transplanted with success in humans. After appropriate institutional review of the ethics, experimental data, treatment protocol, and informed consent, clinical trials were approved. Thirteen hands have been transplanted onto 10 recipients, with resultant low morbidity and no mortality. With the exception of one recipient who requested amputation after the second year, results of hand transplantation have been highly successful. Functional return mirrored that seen after hand replantation. The limbs were progressively integrated into activities of daily living and professional tasks. The hand and patient survival rate exceeds the initial results of any previously transplanted organ. This success strongly supports continuation of these human trials.