Determination of free serum digoxin concentrations in digoxin toxic patients after administration of digoxin fab antibodies

First successful curative use of digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments in a life-threatening coconut crab (Birgus latro L.) poisoning

We wish to report the first curative use of digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments in a coconut crab Birgus latro L. poisoning in New Caledonia. The female patient, aged sixty-three with a previous history of cardiovascular and metabolic dysfunctions, showed marked first-degree atrio-ventricular block and several atrial pauses, and was given 760 mg of digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments. Shortly after the perfusion her electrocardiogram returned to close to normal with only slight first-degree atrio-ventricular block and no more atrial pauses. Neriifolin LC-MS/MS tests performed on the patient's serum and urine samples confirmed cardenolide poisoning. Another, younger patient, with high neriifolin levels in her serum and urine samples only experienced gastro-intestinal symptoms and was discharged without specific treatment. The consumption of coconut crab in New Caledonia should be avoided even though the first of the two cases reported suggests that digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments can be effective in the treatment of life-threatening poisoning caused by the ingestion of this crustacean.

Fab antibody fragments: some applications in clinical toxicology

This review provides current information on the use of antigen-binding fragments (Fab) from cleaved antibodies to treat poisoning with digoxin and other potent, low formula mass poisons, such as colchicine and tricyclic antidepressants. Anti-digoxin Fab fragments have been used successfully for many years in the management of severe poisoning with digoxin, digitoxin, and a range of other structurally related compounds, including cardiotoxins from Nerium and Thevetia sp. (oleander) and Bufo sp. (toads). However, their main use remains treating digoxin poisoning. Equimolar doses of anti-digoxin Fab fragments completely bind digoxin in vivo. The approximate dose of Fab fragments (mg) is 80 times the digoxin body burden (mg). If neither the dose ingested nor the plasma digoxin/digitoxin concentration is known, in an adult 380 mg of anti-digoxin Fab fragments should be given. The dose for elderly patients or those with renal impairment should be similar to that for those with normal renal function. Fab fragments have a plasma half-life of 12-20 hours, but this can be prolonged in patients with renal impairment. Analysis of serum ultrafiltrate using an immunoassay shown not to have matrix bias remains the most accurate approach to measuring free digoxin in the presence of anti-digoxin Fab fragments. The antibody fragments are given intravenously over 15-30 minutes after dilution to at least 250 mL with plasma protein solution, 0.9% (w/v) sodium chloride, or deionised water, except in infants where the volume infused can be reduced. Factors limiting the efficacy of Fab fragments are the dose, the duration of the infusion and any delay in administration. Guidelines for Fab fragment administration in children include (i) dilution to a final Fab concentration of 10 g/L in either 5% (w/v) dextrose or 0.9% (w/v) sodium chloride; (ii) infusion through a 0.22 microm filter; (iii) administration of the total dose over a minimum of 30 minutes; and (iv) avoiding coadministration of other drugs and/or electrolyte solutions. Fab fragments are generally well tolerated. Adverse effects attributable to Fab treatment include hypokalaemia and exacerbation of congestive cardiac failure; renal function could be impaired in some patients. Fab fragment preparations for treating acute colchicine and tricyclic antidepressant poisoning have been developed, but are not available commercially. Colchicine poisoning is rare in Western countries, and pharmacological management together with supportive care is usually effective even in severe tricyclic antidepressant overdosage. Attempts have been made to produce anti-paraquat antibodies capable of enhancing paraquat elimination from the lung, but thus far all such attempts have proved unsuccessful.

Clinical utility of free drug monitoring

Most drugs are bound to serum proteins to a various degree. Only unbound or free drug is pharmacologically active. Usually total drug is measured for therapeutic monitoring because there is equilibrium between bound and free drugs, and concentration of free drug can be predicted from total drug concentration. However, under certain conditions this equilibrium is disturbed and the measured free drug concentration can be significantly higher than expected from total drug concentrations, especially for strongly protein-bound drugs. In such case a patient may experience drug toxicity even if the total drug concentration is within the therapeutic range. Conditions like uremia, liver disease and hypoalbuminemia can lead to significant increases in free drug concentration. Therefore, monitoring free phenytoin and free valproic acid is recommended in these patients. Drug-drug interactions can also lead to a disproportionate increase in free drug concentration. One strongly protein-bound drug can significantly displace another strongly protein-bound drug if both drugs share the same binding site. Several over-the-counter pain medications such as salicylate, naproxen, and ibuprofen can cause significant displacement of both phenytoin and valproic acid from albumin binding site. Interestingly, such interactions are absent in uremic patients. Elderly patients may have increased free phenytoin or valproic acid due to hypoalbuminemia. Elevated free phenytoin concentrations have also been reported in patients with AIDS. Although digoxin is 25% bound to protein, monitoring free digoxin is useful in patients with elevated endogenous digoxin-like immunoreactive substances or in patients overdosed with digoxin and being treated with digibind. Monitoring free digoxin can also eliminate interference of Chinese medicines Chan Su and Danshen in serum digoxin measurement by certain immunoassays. However, free drug monitoring is not a routine procedure in clinical laboratories due to technical difficulties and lack of established reference ranges for free drugs.

The Fab fragment of anti-digoxin antibody (digibind) binds digitoxin-like immunoreactive components of Chinese medicine Chan Su: monitoring the effect by measuring free digitoxin

Chan Su, a Chinese medicine prepared from the skin glands of Chinese toads, is used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Severe toxicity and even death has been reported from overdose with Chan Su. The cardiotonic effect of Chan Su is attributed to bufadienolides, which also have apparent digitoxin activity. We demonstrated that these components of Chan Su could be neutralized by digibind, both in vitro and in vivo. For in vitro experiments, we supplemented drug-free serum pools with aqueous extract of Chan Su. Then, to aliquots of serum pool containing Chan Su, various amounts of digibind (10, 25 or 50 microg/ml of serum) were added. After incubation, total and free digitoxin concentrations (in the protein-free ultrafiltrate) were measured using the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and a FLX/TDx analyzer. For in vivo experiments, mice were fed with Chan Su by gavage. After 45 min, 200 microg of digibind was administered by injection. Fifteen minutes after injection, blood was collected for analysis of total and free apparent digitoxin activities. We observed complete removal of apparent digitoxin activity from protein-free ultrafiltrate both in vitro and in vivo by digibind, indicating that digibind successfully binds Chan Su. We conclude that digibind neutralizes Chan Su, and measuring the free digitoxin concentrations can monitor such an effect.

Validity of unbound digoxin measurements by immunoassays in presence of antidote (Digibind)

Measurement of unbound digoxin in presence of Fab fragments may be useful in management of overdoses. The analysis can be performed on serum directly or on ultrafiltrate of serum. The architecture of the immunoassay may influence the validity of results obtained using these two approaches. We tested this hypothesis by preparing serum mixtures containing various concentrations of digoxin and Digibind and analyzed them by the immunoassays before and after ultrafiltration. Four samples collected from Digibind-treated patients were also analyzed before and after ultrafiltration. The slopes and the y-intercepts of the measured versus the expected values for serum and its ultrafiltrate overlapped for the MEIA digoxin assay. For other three immunoassays tested (ACS:180, Stratus, and On-Line), either the slope or the intercept for measured versus the expected results for serum were significantly different (P < 0.05) than those for ultrafiltrate. Following addition of digoxin and Digibind, differences in results for serum analyzed directly or after ultrafiltration were < 0.50 ng/ml. Comparable samples from digoxin-overdosed patients treated with Digibind had differences of > 1.0 ng/ml. Previous claims reporting direct analysis of digoxin in presence of antidote but not having used patient samples for validation should be revisited. To date, analysis of serum ultrafiltrate by an immunoassay proven not to have matrix bias remains the most accurate approach in measuring unbound digoxin in presence of antidote.

Serum digoxin in the presence of Digibind: determination of digoxin by the Abbott AxSYM and Baxter Stratus II immunoassays by direct analysis without pretreatment of serum samples

We have reevaluated the feasibility of using direct immunochemical methods to track free digoxin in patients receiving Digibind®. We report here that results obtained by the Stratus II and AxSYM immunoassays on patients receiving digoxin (without Digibind), digoxin-fortified serum samples supplemented with Digibind, and a digitoxic patient treated with Digibind, show no clinically significant biases. We conclude that useful free digoxin concentrations may be obtained for Digibind-treated patients using either the AxSYM or Stratus immunoassays without subjecting samples to ultrafiltration before analysis.

Digoxin intoxication in a patient with end-stage renal disease: efficacy of digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments and peritoneal dialysis

Digoxin intoxication is a serious medical problem, and impairment of renal function is a common risk factor for toxicity. Digoxin specific antibody fragments (Fab) is the most effective treatment available for severe digitalis intoxication. The use of Fab therapy in a patient with renal disease is considered as effective as in patients with normal renal function, although the increased risk of rebound digoxin toxicity mandates a longer period of observation. In patients with kidney failure, neither digoxin nor Fab can be removed efficiently from the systemic circulation by hemodialysis or continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Knowledge about the clearance of both compounds by peritoneal dialysis is limited. The authors describe a patient with end stage renal disease who was treated with Fab and peritoneal dialysis for life threatening digoxin intoxication. Like other forms of dialysis, peritoneal dialysis, even when performed in an intensive schedule, is not associated with an enhanced clearance of digoxin.

Analytical performance of a monoclonal digoxin assay with increased specificity on the ACS:180

Digoxin metabolites cross-react in the Ciba Corning ACS digoxin assay in proportion to their bioactivity, but have greater (near 100%) cross-reactivity in the Abbott TDx, Baxter Stratus, and Ciba Corning Magic RIA digoxin assays. We studied the analytical performance of the ACS digoxin assay and compared it with these other assays. Coefficients of variation ranged from 5.5% at 3.11 ng/ml to 8.8% at 0.57 ng/ml. Mean analytical recovery was 96.4%. Results on dilutions were linear in the range of 0.6-5.0 ng/ml. We observed no interference by hemoglobin, bilirubin, or triglycerides. Dihydrodigoxin and digitoxin had lower cross-reactivity in the ACS and Stratus assays than in the TDx and Magic assays. Digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF) in patients' sera was not detected in the ACS assay but was in the TDx, Stratus, and Magic assays. Digibind therapy seemingly did not affect digoxin results by ACS or Stratus, but did for up to 10 days after therapy for TDx and Magic. We compared digoxin results for 121 sera from 49 patients. Deming regression analysis was performed on the first specimen from each patient: ACS = 1.08(TDx)-0.17 ng/ml (r = 0.961, Sy,x = 0.164); ACS = 1.16(Stratus)-0.46 ng/ml (r = 0.973, Sy,x = 0.123); ACS = 1.00(Magic)-0.20 ng/ml (r = 0.982, Sy,x = 0.110). Discrepant results (> 2Sy,x from the regression line) were usually lower by the ACS assay (87%). Nine of 11 patients with discrepant results had renal insufficiency or hepatic disease, conditions commonly associated with increased DLIF. These observations may be explained by the improved specificity of the ACS digoxin assay.

Problems in determining levels of free digoxin in patients treated with digoxin immune FAb

Determination of free digoxin levels in patients treated with digoxin immune FAb has long been a problematic area in clinical laboratory testing. The older radioimmunoassays resulted in inaccurate and variable results due to the competition of the administered drug with the radioactively labelled forms. The 1995 Physicians' Desk Reference continues to state that digoxin immune FAb will interfere with digitalis immunoassay measurements. This statement, however, is based primarily on the RIA methods. We evaluated the Stratus digoxin assay and the TDX digoxin II assay. Increasing amounts of immune FAb were added in a stepwise fashion to 12 patient samples containing high normal to elevated digoxin levels. Results showed a progressive decrease in digoxin levels when assayed with the Stratus kit. However, five patient samples tested with the TDX kit resulted in constant digoxin values despite the presence of increasing digibind levels. These results suggest that the Stratus method measures free digoxin, whereas the TDX method measures the total digoxin. Measurement of digoxin by the Stratus method is simple and quick. The Stratus digoxin assay may be an accurate and objective way of measuring free digoxin levels in patients on digoxin immune FAb.

Magnesium sulfate in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias due to digoxin toxicity

Although digoxin antibodies are the definitive treatment of cardiac arrhythmias due to digoxin toxicity, magnesium can also be effective especially with low serum magnesium levels. The case report describes a patient with digoxin toxicity, ventricular tachycardia and a slightly elevated serum magnesium. Two 10 mmol doses of intravenous magnesium sulfate were associated with a more stable junctional rhythm with bigeminy. Magnesium is known to suppress early after depolarizations, and in supraphysiological doses, may act as an indirect antagonist of digoxin at the sarcolemma Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase pump. Intravenous magnesium may be used to treat cardiac arrhythmias due to digoxin poisoning where there is likely to be a delay in the availability of digoxin antibodies, even in the presence of elevated serum magnesium.