Early diagnosis of rejection of canine pancreas allografts by fine-needle aspiration biopsy

Diagnostic role of fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic allograft to detect rejection

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the same principles to evaluate renal transplant by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for rejection could be applied to pancreatic allograft. Between 1996-1998, 25 ultrasound-guided FNAs on 13 patients with pancreatic allograft were performed and ThinPrep made. The percentage of lymphocytes, lymphoblasts, monocytes, eosinophils, plasma cells, immunoblasts, and macrophages were calculated. Simultaneous peripheral smear was obtained and "total corrected increment" score calculated. Subsequent core biopsy was available in six patients. A total of seven FNAs on three patients were inadequate because of insufficient epithelial cells. No evidence of rejection reported in nine patients was confirmed on biopsy in five patients. One patient reported as suspicious later showed rejection on biopsy. Thus, FNA may be used to monitor the graft status with faster turnaround times. Rejection may be a focal process and FNA may be used for sampling multiple sites. Cytologic diagnosis fairly accurately detects early rejection. Core biopsies are warranted in unsatisfactory specimens and when FNA is suspicious for rejection.

Diagnosis of pancreas rejection: cystoscopic transduodenal versus percutaneous computed tomography scan-guided biopsy

BACKGROUND

The most common cause of graft failure after technically successful pancreas transplants is rejection. Laboratory parameters for detecting pancreas graft rejection are not consistently reliable and can lead to unnecessary antirejection treatment. Histopathologic evaluation is the gold standard in the differential diagnosis of pancreas graft dysfunction. Four biopsy techniques have been described: cystoscopic transduodenal (CB), percutaneous computed tomography scan-guided (PB), open, and laparoscopic biopsy.

METHODS

We studied the two most common techniques, CB and PB, in pancreas transplant recipients with presumed rejection. Group 1 comprised 103 attempts at CB in 82 recipients (53 men, 29 women) with bladder-drained (BD) pancreas transplants, at 1 to 80 (median, 14) months after transplant. Group 2 comprised 93 attempts at PB in 68 recipients (41 men, 27 women), at 0.5 to 64 (median, 14) months after transplant.

RESULTS

In group 1, of 103 attempts at CB, adequate tissue was obtained in 90 (87%): pancreas alone in 23 (22%), pancreas + duodenum in 35 (34%), duodenum alone in 32 (31%). Of the 58 pancreas biopsies, 23 (40%) showed acute rejection. Of the 67 duodenal biopsies, 16 (24%) showed acute rejection. Complications of CB included macrohematuria in 4 recipients (4%) and microhematuria in 32 (31%). We noted no biopsy-related pancreatitis. The mean cost of CB was $2561+/-246. In group 2, of 93 attempts at PB, adequate tissue (all pancreas) was obtained in 67 (72%); of these, 29 (43%) showed acute rejection. Of 23 inaccessible pancreases, 9 (39%) underwent CB; pancreatic tissue was obtained in four (45%), and results were consistent with rejection in all four. Complications of PB included biopsy-related pancreatitis (serum amylase > or = 25%) in five (7%) recipients, macrohematuria in one (1%), and abdominal hemorrhage in two (3%). The mean cost of PB was $1038+/-78. (1) CB and PB prevented unnecessary antirejection treatment in 44% of our recipients with successful biopsies; (2) CB had a higher success rate for obtaining tissue (including duodenal specimens) and a lower rate of major complications; (3) PB was easier and cheaper, did not require general anesthesia, and was performed as an outpatient procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that PB should become the biopsy technique of choice in recipients with presumed pancreas graft rejection. If PB fails, recipients with bladder-drained pancreas transplants should undergo CB. If CB fails, or in recipients with enteric-drained or duct-injected pancreas transplants, a laparoscopic or open biopsy should be considered.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant rejection: separate or synchronous events?

The results of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) cannot be matched by pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), in part because an independent diagnosis of pancreas graft rejection remains difficult. The relationship between rejection of the pancreas and rejection of the kidney is poorly understood, and it is not known whether simultaneous transplantation of both organs confers true protection to either graft. To study these questions, reliable canine allotransplant models of kidney transplantation alone (KTA), PTA, and SPK were established. Sixty-seven mongrel dogs received KTA (n=21), PTA (n=23), or SPK (n=23) with either no immunosuppression, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression, or high-dose CsA-based immunosuppression. Needle core biopsy (NCB) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) were performed at 0, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 21, and 30 days or at the time of graft failure. Pancreas and kidney graft survival after SPK was significantly shorter in dogs given low-dose CsA than in dogs given high-dose CsA (pancreas, P<0.04; kidney, P<0.03). Concurrent NCBs and FNABs were performed on 227 occasions in pancreas grafts and 229 occasions in kidney grafts. The time to initial evidence of rejection by NCB was not different in any immunosuppressed group. Synchronous rejection occurred in 73% of immunosuppressed SPK biopsies. Kidney-only rejection occurred in 23% of biopsies and pancreas-only rejection occurred in only 3% after SPK. All markers of pancreas graft rejection were poor, with the most sensitive being NCB of the simultaneously transplanted kidney. In summary, recipients of SPK required more immunosuppression than recipients of PTA, and improved PTA survival should be achievable with more sensitive markers of rejection. Markers of kidney rejection were the most sensitive indicators of pancreas rejection, and independent pancreas rejection was uncommon after SPK.

Fine-needle cytology in the monitoring of human renal allograft progress

The differential diagnosis of early post-transplant renal dysfunction is complex. Clinical evaluation alone is often inaccurate and it is usually necessary to have recourse to additional investigation. Imaging methods, biochemistry and needle-core biopsy have all proved invaluable in this way, but for making consecutive evaluations of renal allografts, fine-needle aspiration cytology has now emerged as a safe, rapid and reliable addition. Indeed, with a such a negligible incidence of complications, aspirates may be taken on a regular basis with the information obtained not only helping in routine diagnosis but also providing a useful research insight into the dynamic nature of the rejection process. The technique has evolved mainly over the past two decades, initially being based on traditional, semi-quantitative, morphometric cytology. However, monoclonal antibody technology and immunocytochemistry have been developing over the same time period and much use has been made of such procedures as immunofluorescence, immunoperoxidase, immunogold-silver and immunoalkaline phosphatase in further, more subtle analyses of aspirated cell populations. Renal aspiration cytology has become an established technology which is now being adapted to the study of liver, pancreas and even lung allografts.

Percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy of canine pancreas allograft provides diagnosis of treatable rejection

Despite improved pancreas transplant graft survival, early diagnosis of rejection remains a clinical challenge. Using a canine model of whole pancreas transplantation with bladder exocrine drainage we have shown fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) to provide an earlier diagnosis of rejection than fall in urinary amylase (UA). The aim of this study was to assess the ability of anti-rejection therapy to reverse rejection when the diagnosis was based on either FNAB findings or a fall of UA. Sixteen dogs received a total pancreas allograft with an inadequate dose of oral cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/day). Fasting UA levels were measured daily and percutaneous FNAB with ultrasound guidance was performed three times weekly on all dogs. The diagnosis of rejection was made in alternate dogs with either a fall of UA to a level of less than 5000 IU/liter (median 7 days) or when the total corrected increment (TCI) of aspirated infiltrating cells was greater than 2.6 (median 5 days). Anti-rejection therapy consisted of methylprednisolone 10 mg/kg/day iv for 5 days and an increase of oral cyclosporine dosage to 25 mg/kg/day. Early vascular thrombosis (Day 2) occurred in three allografts. Diagnosis of rejection based on a low level of UA permitted the successful reversal of rejection in only one of six grafts, whereas five of seven grafts were successfully treated when rejection diagnosis was based on FNAB. Median allograft survivals were 9 days (range 8-19) and 32 days (range 11-63), respectively (P less than 0.01). The earlier diagnosis of allograft rejection made by FNAB improved the ability of conventional anti-rejection therapy to reverse pancreas allograft rejection and significantly improved allograft survival.