Evidence that the serum of moderate-to-severely rejecting heart transplant patients induces peripheral blood mononuclear cells to injure endothelial cells

Alterations in mRNA for inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthase and plasma nitric oxide with rejection and/or infection of allotransplanted lungs

BACKGROUND

Experiments were designed to determine expression of type II (iNOS) and type III (ecNOS) nitric oxide synthase in lung parenchyma and systemic endothelial cells with rejection and/or infection of single lung allografts.

METHODS

After single lung allotransplantation, dogs were maintained on standard triple immunosuppressive therapy for 5 days and then placed into one of three groups. Group I (n=4) was maintained on immunosuppressants, group II (n=7) immunosuppression was withdrawn to allow acute rejection of the allograft, and group III (n=6) infection was induced by bronchoscopic inoculation of Escherichia coli.

RESULTS

At postoperative days 7-9, no histological evidence of rejection or infection was observed in transplanted lungs of group I. In lungs of group II, rejection ranged from mild to severe; in lungs of group III, infection was severe. Some animals had both rejection and infection (n=8) and were studied separately. Plasma levels of nitric oxide increased comparably with rejection and/or infection compared to preoperative values. Expression of mRNA for ecNOS decreased significantly in lung parenchyma but not in aortic endothelial cells from dogs of groups II and III. However, expression of mRNA for iNOS increased with both rejection and/or infection in both lung parenchyma and aortic endothelial cells.

CONCLUSIONS

iNOS is induced locally within the graft and systemically in aortic endothelial cells with rejection and/or infection of lung allografts. Plasma levels of nitric oxide are elevated with both rejection and infection and may not be useful in the differential diagnosis of these processes after lung transplantation.

Treatment with an antioxidant inhibits vascular changes caused by circulating lymphocytes during acute lung rejection in dogs

BACKGROUND

Experiments were designed to evaluate the effect of treatment with an inhibitor of lipid peroxidation, H 290/51, on the interaction of lymphocytes and pulmonary arteries during acute lung rejection. It was hypothesized that inhibition of lipid peroxidation would reduce contractions of the pulmonary arteries to autogenous rejection-activated lymphocytes.

METHODS

Single-lung transplantation was performed in three groups of dogs: group 1 was maintained on immunosuppression for 8 days postoperatively; in group 2, immunosuppression was discontinued on postoperative day 5, so that rejection occurred on postoperative day 8; in group 3, immunosuppression was discontinued after 5 days, and the lipid peroxidation inhibitor H 290/51 was given orally for 3 days. The pulmonary arteries were removed, cut into rings, and suspended in organ chambers for measurement of isometric force.

RESULTS

Macrophage-depleted mononuclear cells (MNCs; lymphocytes) isolated from blood caused cell number-dependent contractions in rings of the pulmonary arteries from all dogs. In the rejecting dogs treated with H 290/51 (group 3), contractions to MNCs were significantly greater in rings without endothelium compared to rings with endothelium. Contractions to MNCs with or without endothelium were reduced by adding deteroxamine to the medium but not by adding superoxide dismutase and catalase.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that treatment with a lipid peroxidation inhibitor, H 290/51, does not prevent acute rejection of transplanted lungs. The treatment with the peroxidation inhibitor modifies contractions of the pulmonary arteries in response to rejection-activated lymphocytes, indicating that reactive oxidative metabolites may be involved in the vasoactive response resulting from this interaction.

Endothelin-1 and cell proliferation in lung organ cultures. Implications for lung allografts

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in patients following lung transplantation. ET-1 causes contraction of isolated pulmonary vessels and bronchi and stimulates proliferation of smooth muscle cells in culture. Therefore, ET-1 could contribute to the smooth muscle hyperplasia and stromal proliferation seen in chronic rejection of lung allografts. Experiments were designed to determine whether (1) ET-1 stimulates proliferation of pulmonary tissue, (2) proliferation is increased in rejecting allotransplanted lungs, (3) endothelin-A receptors mediate the proliferative response, and (4) ET-1 is produced by activated infiltrating immunocompetent cells. Lung organ cultures were prepared from unoperated dogs and dogs with rejecting single lung allografts. Incubation of organ cultures from unoperated dogs with ET-1 (10(-9) to 10(-7) M)) increased positive staining for proliferation cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in lung parenchyma. PCNA staining was not decreased by the endothelin-A antagonist BQ123 (10(-6) M). In addition, immunostaining for endothelin-B receptors was present in sections of unoperated but not rejecting lungs. PCNA staining in lung cultures from rejecting allotransplanted dogs was significantly greater than that from unoperated dogs. Positive immunohistochemical staining for ET-1 was found in mononuclear cells infiltrating rejecting transplanted lungs. In conclusion, exogenous ET-1 is mitogenic in lung organ cultures through receptors other than endothelin-A. Proliferation in rejecting transplanted lungs is increased compared with unoperated lungs. Mononuclear cells may be a source of endothelin-1 in the rejecting lung. ET-1, therefore could, in synergism with other cytokines, contribute to acute and chronic pathological changes seen in pulmonary rejection.

Effects of acute rejection and antirejection therapy on arteries and veins from canine single lung allografts

Experiments were designed to compare the function of the endothelium and smooth muscle in intralobar pulmonary arteries and veins of transplanted lungs during acute rejection and after treatment of rejection. Single lung allografts were performed in dogs. Dogs were monitored for 5 days to allow good recovery from the operation and resolution of early chest radiographic changes. In group I, immunosuppression (cyclosporine A, azathioprine, and methylprednisone) was withdrawn to allow rejection, which typically occurred after 3 days. In group II, immunosuppression was reinstituted at this time during acute rejection until the chest roentgenograms again cleared (approximately after 6 days). The blood vessels were studied at this time. Rings were cut from intralobar pulmonary arteries and veins of the allotransplanted lungs and suspended for the measurement of isometric force in organ chambers. Contractions of arteries and veins to phenylephrine but not endothelin-1 were significantly reduced during acute rejection. In arteries and veins, endothelium-dependent relaxations to bradykinin but not the calcium ionophore A23187 were reduced with rejection. Relaxations of the smooth muscle to histamine increased with rejection in both blood vessels. Relaxations to nitric oxide were reduced with rejection in veins but not arteries. Treatment of rejection reversed all responses toward those observed in arteries and veins in lungs from dogs not undergoing transplantation. These results suggest that responses of the endothelium and smooth muscle of pulmonary arteries and veins of transplanted lungs are altered similarly during rejection. Further, treatment of rejection restores function of the pulmonary blood vessels of lung allografts toward that observed in unoperated lungs.

Impact of acute pulmonary rejection on cardiac function

BACKGROUND

Experiments were designed to define cardiac function in dogs with single lung allografts during acute rejection of the allografted lung.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Left lungs were either autotransplanted (n = 4) or allotransplanted (n = 8) in adult male mongrel dogs. All allotransplanted animals were maintained on triple-drug immunosuppression (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids) for 5 days after the operation. In 4 allotransplanted animals, treatment was discontinued, allowing the animals to reject (usually after a further 3 days; rejecting group); 4 other allotransplanted animals were maintained on immunosuppression for an additional 3 days (immunosuppressed group). Another group of dogs were not operated on but were maintained on the same immunosuppression as the rejecting group (controls). All experimental animals underwent fast computed tomographic scanning with measurement of left ventricular pressure and calculation of ventricular chamber volumes, cross-sectional areas of coronary arteries, myocardial perfusion, and intramyocardial blood volume. Neither cardiac output, left ventricular mass, left ventricular pressure, nor myocardial oxygen consumption was altered during acute rejection of lung allografts. However, left ventricular contractility (systolic elastance, Emax) and ejection fraction were depressed to approximately one half (P < .05) in acutely rejecting animals compared with other groups. The cross-sectional area of the coronary arteries was less in autotransplanted and allotransplanted treated animals than in animals that were not operated on. Cross-sectional area of the coronary arteries was decreased by an additional 30% in the rejecting group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that acute rejection of a single lung allograft decreases cardiac performance and reduces diameter of coronary arteries in the recipient. Alterations of circulating humoral factors and activated leukocytes may contribute to these changes.

Mononuclear cells from dogs with acute lung allograft rejection cause contraction of pulmonary arteries

PURPOSE

Experiments were designed to determine whether or not leukocytes activated by acute pulmonary rejection cause contractions of isolated pulmonary arteries.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Separate suspensions of (a) polymorphonuclear cells (> 95%) and (b) mononuclear cells (85% lymphocytes/10% monocytes/5% polymorphonuclear cells), respectively, were obtained from the arterial blood of four groups of adult male mongrel dogs: unoperated dogs (controls), dogs with single-lung autotransplants, dogs with rejecting single-lung allotransplants, and unoperated dogs treated with the same immunosuppressants as allotransplanted dogs. These suspensions were added to rings of control intralobar pulmonary arteries suspended in organ chambers for measurement of isometric force. The endothelium was removed mechanically from selected rings. No significant change in basal tension of pulmonary arterial rings occurred by adding suspensions of polymorphonuclear cells from any of the four groups of dogs. Significant cell-number-dependent increases in tension occurred with suspensions of mononuclear cells from unoperated dogs, autotransplanted dogs, and unoperated, medicated dogs. These increases in tension were less in rings with compared to those without endothelium. Addition of a synthetic analogue of L-arginine abolished this difference. Suspensions of mononuclear cells from rejecting allotransplanted dogs caused significantly greater contractions in rings with endothelium than those observed with suspended cells from either unoperated, autotransplanted dogs or unoperated, medicated dogs. Addition of superoxide dismutase plus catalase or an antagonist of endothelin-A receptors (BQ-123) reduced contractions in rings with endothelium but not in those without endothelium to suspensions of mononuclear cells from rejecting allotransplanted dogs.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that mononuclear cells cause contraction of pulmonary arteries, which can be partially inhibited by endothelium-derived nitric oxide. However, if the mononuclear cells are activated by acute pulmonary rejection, contractions are no longer inhibited by the endothelium. Under conditions of rejection, contractions are mediated in part by oxygen radicals and endothelin(s).

Cellular mechanisms of allograft rejection

It is generally agreed that a multiplicity of mechanisms are involved in the rejection of various grafts across different histocompatibility barriers. Recent publications have concentrated less on the characterization of the cells involved in the rejection process and more on their initial activation and their infiltration into the graft.