A comparative analysis of results and morbidity in type I diabetics undergoing preemptive versus postdialysis combined pancreas-kidney transplantation

Pre-emptive Intestinal Transplant: The Surgeon's Point of View

Pre-emptive transplantation is a well-established practice for certain types of end-organ failure such as in the use of kidney transplantation. For irreversible intestinal failure, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) remains the gold standard, due to the suboptimal long-term results of intestinal transplantation. As such, the only role for pre-emptive transplantation, if at all, will be for patients identified to be at high risk of complications and mortality while on definitive long-term TPN. In these patients, the timing of early listing and transplantation could become life-saving, taking into account that mortality on the waiting list is still the highest for intestinal candidates. The development of simulation models or pre-transplant scoring systems could help in selecting patients based on potential outcome on TPN or with transplantation, and recent reports from high-volume centers identify few underlying pathologic conditions and some TPN complications as at higher risk of increased morbidity and mortality. A pre-emptive transplant could be used as a rehabilitative procedure in a well-selected case-by-case scenario, among TPN patients at risk of liver failure, repeated central line infections, mesenteric infarction, short bowel syndrome (SBS) <50 cm or with end stoma, congenital mucosal disease, desmoid tumors: These conditions must be carefully evaluated, not to underestimate the clinical stage nor to over-estimate the impact of a temporary situation. At the present time, diseases with a variable and unpredictable course, such as intestinal dysmotility disorders, or quality of life and financial issues are still far from being considered as indications for a pre-emptive transplant.

Continuous glucose monitoring in subjects after simultaneous pancreas-kidney and kidney-alone transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation is an important replacement therapy for individuals with diabetes and end-stage renal disease. Kidney-alone (KA) transplantation is associated with a high incidence of post-transplant diabetes.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. We studied 48-h glucose concentrations in eight subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus after SPK transplantation, six subjects post-KA transplantation, and nine healthy controls using the CGMS (Medtronic Minimed, Northridge, CA) continuous glucose monitoring system.

RESULTS

The 48-h mean glucose concentration was 101 +/- 7 mg/dL in the SPK subjects, 105 +/- 12 mg/dL in the KA subjects, and 99 +/- 7 mg/dL in the healthy controls. The glycemic excursions were higher in the KA group compared to the SPK cohort and healthy controls (P < 0.0001). No differences in the incidence of hypoglycemia were detected among the three groups. Significant postprandial hyperglycemia was uncovered in four of the six KA subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

SPK transplantation is very effective at normalizing glycemic excursions. Unsuspected hyperglycemia was identified in the KA group. The CGMS was a useful ambulatory tool to study glucose profiles in the post-transplant period and may help uncover hyperglycemia undetected by routine laboratory testing.

Pancreas transplantation

Since the introduction of pancreas transplantation more than 40 years ago, efforts to develop more minimally invasive techniques for endocrine replacement therapy have been in progress, yet this surgical procedure still remains the treatment of choice for diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure. Many improvements have been made in the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens, both of which have contributed to an increasing number of indications for pancreas transplantation. This operation can be justified on the basis that patients replace daily injections of insulin with an improved quality of life but at the expense of a major surgical procedure and lifelong immunosuppression. The various indications, categories, and outcomes of patients having a pancreas transplant are discussed, particularly with reference to the effect on long-term diabetic complications.

Preemptive versus Non-preemptive simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a single-center, long-term, follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the timing-before or after initiation of dialysis-of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with end-stage renal failure are sparse. We studied the effect of preemptive transplantation on patient survival, cardiovascular endpoints, and graft survival, as compared with non-preemptive transplantation.

METHODS

All 180 SPKT recipients (aged 23-58 years) who received a SPKT in Leiden between December 1986 and May 2004 were included in the analysis. Sixty-five patients (36.1%) were transplanted preemptively. Mean follow-up time was 6.3 years.

RESULTS

Up to 8.2 years after transplantation, we found no differences in patient survival. Later on, divergence occurred: 10-year patient survival was 71.3% in the preemptive group versus 63.8% in the dialysis group and 15-year patient survival was 64.8% versus 45.1% in the dialysis group, leading to an adjusted hazard ratio for mortality of 0.50 (95% CI 0.23-1.06, P=0.070). Cause of death was less often of cardiac origin in the preemptive group (adjusted HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.026-0.95, P=0.044). Graft survival did not follow the same trend. No significant differences were found between the two groups considering allograft survival, cerebrovascular accident, or myocardial infarction. The percentage of patients with minor or major amputation(s) after transplantation was slightly lower in the preemptive group (24.6 vs. 32.1%; adjusted HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.42-1.82, P=0.72).

CONCLUSION

Preemptive SPKT offered a patient survival benefit as compared with transplantation performed while already on dialysis and was associated with a lower rate of cardiac deaths.

Comparison of 1-year patient and graft survival rates between preemptive and dialysed simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant recipients

It is well known that the main decrease in graft and recipient survival rates is observed during the first 12 months after transplantation. Improving results during this period seems to be crucial for the late outcome. The aim of this study was to compare 1-year survival rates of dialyzed and preemptive pancreas and renal graft recipients and their graft function. From November 1999 to January 2005, 42 whole simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantations (spktx) were stratified into group I (n = 13): recipients who received a preemptive pancreas and kidney transplant versus group II (n = 29): previously dialyzed spktx recipients. The mean time of dialysis for group II was 39 +/- 16.5 months. We assessed 1-year cumulative survival rates for recipients and grafts for each group. The 1-year cumulative survival rate for preemptive graft recipients was significantly higher than that for dialyzed patients before spktx (100% vs 69%; P = .05). For groups I and II 1-year cumulative graft survival rates for kidney grafts were 100% and 89%, respectively, and for pancreatic grafts 84% and 65.5%, respectively. There was a significant improvement in the 1-year survival rate of preemptive spktx recipients compared with patients dialyzed before spktx. However, 1-year pancreas and kidney graft function did not differ significantly between the groups.

Evaluation of Type 1 Diabetics for Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation With Regard to Cardiovascular Risk

The main cause of death for diabetic patients and patients on dialysis is coronary artery disease (CAD). The most common cause of graft loss following simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) is death with a functioning graft due to CAD. Therefore, careful pretransplantation evaluation of CAD is mandatory. In our series, every patient undergoes a noninvasive cardiac function test like dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) or myocardial thallium scintigraphy using adenosine to induce medical stress. Thirty patients were evaluated for SPK: 15 patients with myocardial scintigraphy and 8 with DSE. Seven investigations showed pathological findings and we performed coronary angiograms, none of which showed coronary artery stenosis. Seven primary coronary angiograms were performed: four due to a history of CAD and three as a primary diagnostic. Following SPK one patient died at 21 days after transplantation due to myocardial infarction. He had a history of CAD with angioplasty and stent implantation. Noninvasive cardiac function tests like DSE or myocardial scintigraphy are reliable methods to evaluate CAD in patients with diabetic nephropathy awaiting SPK. In case of a suspicious finding or a history of CAD, a coronary angiogram should be performed to assess the need for revascularization. Following this algorithm we may further reduce the mortality of SPK.

Early morbidity after pancreas transplantation

This study aims to evaluate and compare the early outcome of both pancreas-alone transplantation (PTA) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPKT) focusing on the complications affecting the first month after the procedures. The records of all patients who underwent PTA or SPKT were reviewed. We considered the length of ICU stay, the need for postoperative ventilatory support, hemodynamic and metabolic data (arterial pH, serum glucose, need for exogenous insulin), infectious diseases incidence, microbiological colonization rate and any kind of postoperative complication arising during the first month after the transplantation. PTA recipients underwent a quicker surgery (P < 0.01) with shorter ICU stay (P < 0.05) and a lower need for postoperative mechanical ventilation (P < 0.05). They also had a higher hemodynamic stability (P < 0.05) with less cardiological complications (P < 0.05) in the intra- and postoperative phases; bacterial colonisation was also less frequent in PTA recipients (P < 0.05). On the contrary, no significant difference was noted with regard to postoperative nausea/vomiting, sudden myocardial death, ICU re-admissions, graft function, rate of rejection, grafts explantation and re-transplantation. PTA could be considered as preemptive for severe diabetic complications in patients with long-lasting severe type I diabetes. However, establishing the correct timing of PTA is of paramount importance in order not to expose the patients early to risks arising from a major surgery and heavy immunosuppressive treatments.

Low-protein vegetarian diet with alpha-chetoanalogues prior to pre-emptive pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Pre-emptive pancreas-kidney transplantation is increasingly considered the best therapy for irreversible chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 1 diabetics. However, the best approach in the wait for transplantation has not yet been defined.

AIM

To evaluate our experience with a low-protein (0.6 g/kg/day) vegetarian diet supplemented with alpha-chetoanalogues in type 1 diabetic patients in the wait for pancreas-kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Prospective study. Information on the progression of renal disease, compliance, metabolic control, reasons for choice and for drop-out were recorded prospectively; the data for the subset of patients who underwent the diet while awaiting a pancreas-kidney graft are analysed in this report.

RESULTS

From November 1998 to April 2004, 9 type 1 diabetic patients, wait-listed or performing tests for wait-listing for pancreas-kidney transplantation, started the diet. All of them were followed by nephrologists and diabetologists, in the context of integrated care. There were 4 males and 5 females; median age 38 years (range 27.9-45.5); median diabetes duration 23.8 years (range 16.6-33.1), 8/9 with widespread organ damage; median creatinine at the start of the diet: 3.2 mg/dl (1.2-7.2); 4 patients followed the diet to transplantation, 2 are presently on the diet, 2 dropped out and started dialysis after a few months, 1 started dialysis (rescue treatment). The nutritional status remained stable, glycemia control improved in 4 patients in the short term and in 2 in the long term, no hyperkalemia, acidosis or other relevant side effect was recorded. Proteinuria decreased in 5 cases, in 3 from the nephrotic range. Albumin levels remained stable; the progression rate was a loss of 0.47 ml/min of creatinine clearance per month (ranging from an increase of 0.06 to a decrease of 2.4 ml/min) during the diet period (estimated by the Cockroft-Gault formula).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-protein supplemented vegetarian diets may be a useful tool to slow CKD progression whilst awaiting pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Comparison of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in recipients of pancreas transplantation

The study was performed to compare the efficacy and side effects of azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in conjunction with cyclosporine or tacrolimus and steroids for the prevention of acute pancreas rejection during the first 6 months of pancreas transplantation. In this case-controlled study, MMF is compared with historical controls of AZA in the prevention of acute pancreas rejection. The primary measures of treatment efficacy were patient and pancreas survival rate at 6 months after transplantation. Secondary efficacy measures were the occurrence of biopsy-proven pancreas rejections and the use of antilymphocyte preparations for rejection treatment. A total of 111 pancreas transplant patients (57 in the AZA group and 54 in the MMF group) were evaluated. The 6-month patient survival rate was 96% in the AZA group versus 97% in the MMF group (p = 0.57). The 6-month pancreas graft survival rate was 88% in the AZA group versus 91% in the MMF group (p = 0.29). However, biopsy-proven rejection episodes during the first 6 months of transplantation were significantly lower with MMF (46%) than with AZA (69%) (p = 0.01). In addition, patients in the AZA group received a greater number of full courses of antilymphocyte therapy as a rejection treatment (p = 0.004). Overall, the frequency of adverse events was similar, although the MMF group experienced higher incidences of gastrointestinal adverse events. In conclusion, compared with AZA, MMF significantly reduces the rate of biopsy-proven pancreas rejection during the first 6 months of transplantation and is well tolerated, except for gastrointestinal adverse events.

Effect of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation on mortality of patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure

BACKGROUND

Long-term prognosis of patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure appears to be better after kidney transplantation compared with dialysis. Controversy exists about the additional benefit of a simultaneously transplanted pancreatic graft. We studied the effect on mortality of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation compared with kidney transplantation alone from regional differences in transplantation protocols.

METHODS

All 415 patients with type-1 diabetes (aged 18-52 years) who started renal-replacement therapy in the Netherlands between 1985 and 1996 were included in the analysis. Patients were allocated to a centre based on their place of residence at onset of renal failure. In the Leiden area, the primary intention to treat was with a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, whereas in the non-Leiden area, kidney transplantation alone was the predominant type of treatment. All patients were followed up to July, 1997. Analyses, mortality, and graft failure were by Cox proportional-hazard model adjusted for age and sex.

FINDINGS

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation was done in 41 (73%) of 56 transplanted patients in the Leiden area compared with 59 (37%) of 158 transplanted patients in the non-Leiden area (p<0.001). The hazard ratio for mortality after the start of renal-replacement therapy was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.36-0.77, p<0.001) in the Leiden area compared with the non-Leiden area. When just the transplanted patients were analysed the mortality ratio was 0.4 (95% CI 0.20-0.77, p=0.008) and was independent of duration of dialysis and early transplant-related deaths. Equal survival was found for patients on dialysis only.

INTERPRETATION

These data support the hypothesis that simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation prolongs survival in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal failure.

Review of immunosuppressive usage in pancreas transplantation

Throughout 1997, nearly 10,000 pancreas transplants have been performed worldwide, with 88% being simultaneous kidney transplants (SKPT). The current 1 yr patient survival rate exceeds 90% and pancreas graft survival (complete insulin independence) rate exceeds 80% for SKPT, 70% for sequential pancreas after kidney transplant (PAKT), and 65% for pancreas transplant alone (PTA). According to registry data, rejection accounts for 32% of graft failures in the first year after pancreas transplantation. However, improvements are expected to continue with the evolution of treatment protocols. Most pancreas transplant centers employ quadruple drug immunosuppression with anti-lymphocyte induction with either a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody agent. In recent years, there has been an overall decline in the use of antibody induction therapy from 90% during the period 1987-1993 to 83% of pancreas transplants performed during 1994-1997. Maintenance immunosuppression is triple therapy consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), corticosteroids, and an anti-metabolite (AZA or MMF). Prior to 1995, nearly all pancreas transplant recipients were managed with Sandimmune. In the last 2 yr, tacrolimus-based therapy has been used in approximately 20% of cases and a new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral) has replaced Sandimmune in contemporary post-transplant immunosuppression. In addition, MMF is replacing AZA as part of the standard immunosuppressive regimen after pancreas transplantation. At present, a number of centers are conducting various trials with new drug combinations including either Neoral or tacrolimus in combination with steroids and MMF with or without antibody induction therapy. From 1994 to 1997, the 1 yr rates of immunologic graft loss have decreased to 2% after SKPT, 9% after PAKT, and 16% after PTA. The current array of new immunosuppressive agents are providing more effective control of rejection and permitting solitary pancreas transplantation to become an accepted treatment option in diabetic patients without advanced complications. The apparent potency of new drug combinations has also resulted in a resurgence of interest in steroid withdrawal. Immunosuppressive strategies will continue to evolve in order to achieve effective control of rejection while minimizing injury to the allograft and risk to the patient. In addition, new regimens must not only address the issue of specific drug toxicities but also long-term economic, metabolic, and quality of life outcomes. Pancreas transplantation will remain an important alternative in the treatment of diabetic patients until other strategies are developed that can provide equal glycemic control with less immunosuppression and overall morbidity.

Pancreas transplantation

Although intensified insulin therapy regimens enable normalization of blood glucose levels and related metabolic parameters, these regimens are associated with an increased incidence of hypoglycemic episodes. Pancreas transplantation has achieved the goal of providing insulin independence with stable and continuous normoglycemia. But because of the associated morbidity and mortality and the need for life-long immunosuppression after transplant, it is difficult to justify pancreas transplantation in diabetic patients at a pre-uremic stage. Pancreas transplantation is therefore performed in conjugation with renal transplantation. The majority of renal transplant centers, however, have been reluctant to perform simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation in insulin-dependent uremic patients because of the additional risks associated with pancreas transplantation. More recently, refinements in surgical technique, introduction of new immunosuppressive agents, and better selection of transplant candidates have contributed to improved survival. Today, combined pancreas-kidney transplantation is an accepted treatment for carefully selected patients with insulin dependent diabetes and end-stage renal disease and in a small group of patients with uncontrolled severe metabolic problems. The effect of a euglycemic state after pancreas transplantation on the progression of micro- and macroangiopathy remains to be proved, although recently there is evidence to suggest that some end-organ lesions may be halted or even ameliorated. Further improvement in anti-rejection strategies may achieve better long-term graft survival and provide the incentive to perform pancreas transplantation at an earlier stage, before severe secondary complications of diabetes develop.

Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: a multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era

OBJECTIVES

To study significant surgical complications requiring early (< or = 3 months posttransplant) relaparotomy (relap) after pancreas transplants, and to develop clinically relevant surgical and peritransplant decision-making guidelines for preventing and managing such complications.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Pancreas grafts are still associated with the highest surgical complication rate of all routinely transplanted solid organs. However, the impact of surgical complications on morbidity, hospital costs, and graft and patient survival rates has not been analyzed in detail to date.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied surgical complications requiring relap in 441 consecutive cadaver, bladder-drained pancreas transplants (54% simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK]; 22% pancreas after kidney [PAK]; 24% pancreas transplant alone [PTA]; 37% retransplant). Outcome and hospital charges were analyzed separately for recipients with versus without reoperation.

RESULTS

The overall relap rate was 32% (SPK, 36%; PAK, 25%; PTA, 16%; p = 0.04). The most common causes were intraabdominal infection and graft pancreatitis (38%), pancreas graft thrombosis (27%), and anastomotic leak (15%). Perioperative relap mortality was 9%; transplant pancreatectomy was necessary in 57% of all recipients with one or more relaps. The pancreas graft was lost in 80% of recipients with versus 41% without relap (p < 0.0001). Patient survival rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for recipients with versus without relap. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for graft loss included older donor age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (PAK), relap for infection (SPK, PAK), and relap for leak or bleeding (PAK). For death, risk factors included older recipient age (SPK, PAK),retransplant (SPK, PAK), relap for thrombosis (PAK), relap for infection or leak (SPK), and relap for bleeding (PTA).

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant surgical complications requiring relap were frequent, resulted in a high rate of pancreas (SPK, PAK, PTA) and kidney (SPK, PAK) graft loss, and had a major economic impact (p = 0.0001). Complications were associated with substantial perioperative mortality and decreased patient survival rates. The focus must therefore shift from graft salvage to preservation of the recipient's life once a pancreas graft-related complication requiring relap occurs. Thus, the threshold for pancreatectomy should be low. In this context, acceptance of older donors and recipients must be reconsidered.

Analysis of early readmissions after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation

Combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) has become generally accepted as an effective treatment option, but controversy exists regarding the early morbidity rate of the procedure. To address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed all readmissions occurring in the first 3 months after PKT. Over a 5-year period, we performed 98 PKTs with bladder drainage. The mean recipient age was 36.6 years, with a mean pretransplant duration of diabetes of 23.5 years. All patients received quadruple immunosuppression with antilymphocyte induction therapy. The mean length of initial hospital stay was 20 days. One hundred forty-five readmissions occurred in 73 patients (74.5%), with the initial readmission occurring at a mean of 8.5 days after hospital dismissal and 28 days after PKT. Twenty-five patients (25.5%) had no readmissions, 35 (36%) had one readmission, 17 (17%) had two readmissions, and the remaining 21 patients (21.5%) had three or more readmissions in the first 3 months. The mean number of readmissions was 1.5 per patient. Forty-seven patients (48%) were readmitted within 1 week, and all but one initial readmission occurred within 1 month of hospital dismissal. Causes of readmission included rejection (51), infection (32), pancreas-specific morbidity (such as dehydration, hematuria, or pancreatitis; 50), and miscellaneous causes (12). Thirteen patients (13%) underwent reoperation during readmission. The mean length of hospital stay during readmission was 7.6 days. The mean total length of hospitalization in the first 3 months after PKT was 31 days. Over the span of 5 years, no changes have occurred either in the incidence, timing, causes, or duration of readmissions. The patient survival rate is 96%, the kidney graft survival rate is 90%, and the pancreas graft survival rate is 88% after a mean follow-up of 2.6 years. Mean rehabilitation time (return to work or normal activity) after PKT was 4.0 months. In conclusion, PKT is associated with a fixed morbidity characterized by early readmission (within 1 week) in nearly half of patients and pancreas-specific morbidity as the cause in 35% of readmissions. During evaluation, prospective candidates should be counseled regarding the unique morbidity of PKT. Successful management strategies must emphasize the intensity of early follow-up and recognize the propensity toward immunologic, metabolic, exocrine, and urologic side effects.

Extending the margin of safety of preservation period for resuscitation of ischemically damaged pancreas during preservation using the two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution/perfluorochemical) method at 20 degrees C with thromboxane A2 synthesis inhibitor OKY046

We have shown that 5-hr preservation using the two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution/perfluorochemical) method at 20 degrees C allows ATP synthesis and makes it possible to resuscitate a canine pancreas subjected to 90 min of warm ischemia. However, 8 hr of preservation using this method caused a disturbance of vascular microcirculation and did not resuscitate the grafts. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of thromboxane A2 synthesis inhibitor OKY046 on vascular endothelial cells and ATP tissue levels of canine pancreas during preservation using the two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution/perfluorochemical) method at 20 degrees C, and vascular microcirculation and pancreas viability after transplantation. Graft viability was judged by graft survival following autotransplantation. ATP tissue levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography at the end of preservation. Viability of the vascular endothelial cells was judged using nuclear trypan blue uptake of the graft after preservation. Pancreatic tissue perfusion was measured using an H2 clearance technique after reperfusion. Pancreas grafts subjected to 90 min of warm ischemia were not viable (0/5). However, 5-hr preservation made it possible to recover the pancreas (5/5); 8-hr preservation was not successful (0/3). ATP tissue levels after 5-hr and 8-hr preservation were 9.40+/-2.09 and 7.37+/-1.06 micromol/g dry weight, respectively, and OKY046 did not affect ATP synthesis during 8-hr preservation (8.44+/-0.92 micromol/g dry weight). The percentage of nuclear trypan blue uptake of endothelial cells in 8-hr-preserved grafts was 37.6+/-11.6% and was significantly higher than the value in 5-hr-preserved grafts (5.0+/-3.0%; P<0.01). However, OKY046 significantly reduced trypan blue uptake in 8-hr-preserved grafts (8.2+/-3.6%; P<0.01). Pancreatic tissue perfusion in 8-hr-preserved grafts after 2 hr of reperfusion was 28.5+/-7.5 ml/min/100 g, and was significantly lower than the value in 5-hr-preserved grafts (57.1+/-4.4 ml/ min/100 g; P<0.01), but OKY046 dramatically improved pancreatic tissue perfusion (97.1+/-14.6 ml/min/100 g; P<0.01). As a consequence, 8-hr-preserved grafts were resuscitated (4/5). We conclude that OKY046 protects the vascular endothelium during preservation by the two-layer method at 20 degrees C and consequently improves vascular microcirculation on reperfusion. Together with ATP synthesis, which is essential for repairing damaged cells, the canine pancreas graft subjected to 90 min of warm ischemia is resuscitated during 8-hr preservation by the two-layer method at 20 degrees C. This method holds promise for pancreas-kidney transplantation from cardiac arrest donors.

Resuscitation of ischemically damaged pancreas during short-term preservation at 20 degrees C by the two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution/perfluorochemical) method

We have shown that 24-hr preservation by a two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution [UW]/perfluorochemical [PFC]) cold storage method allows tissue ATP synthesis and makes it possible to resuscitate a canine pancreas subjected to 90 min of warm ischemia. The purpose of this study was to examine whether increasing preservation temperature to 20 degrees C makes it possible to shorten a preservation period for recovery of ischemically damaged pancreas grafts. After 90 min of warm ischemia, canine pancreas grafts were preserved using the two-layer (UW/PFC) method for 1 to 8 hr at 20 degrees C, and then autotransplanted. A K-value of intravenous glucose tolerance test more than 1.0 at 2 weeks after transplantation was considered graft survival. ATP tissue levels were measured by high performance liquid chromatography at the end of preservation. Pancreatic tissue perfusions were measured using an H2 clearance technique after 30 min to 4 hr of reperfusion. Pancreas grafts subjected to 90 min of warm ischemia were not viable (0/5, control group). However, 3- and 5-hr preservations made it possible to recover the ischemically damaged pancreas (3/5 and 5/5, respectively), although 1- and 8-hr preservations were not successful (0/3 and 0/3, respectively). ATP tissue levels in 1-hr-preserved grafts were 2.55 +/- 0.38 mumol/g dry weight and were significantly lower compared with the levels in 5- and 8-hr-preserved grafts, 9.40 +/- 2.09 (P < 0.01) and 7.37 +/- 1.06 (P < 0.01), respectively. On the other hand, pancreatic tissue perfusions in 8-hr-preserved grafts after 2 hr of reperfusion were 28.50 +/- 7.52 ml/100 g/min and were significantly lower than the values in 1- and 5-hr-preserved grafts, 66.0 +/- 11.22 (P < 0.01) and 57.10 +/- 4.40 (P < 0.01), respectively. It was suggested that 1-hr-preservation was not enough to synthesize ATP, which was essential to repair damaged cells, although vascular microcirculation at reperfusion was maintained and 8-hr preservation incurred microcirculatory disturbances, although ATP for repairing damaged cells was synthesized. We conclude that 3- to 5-hr preservation at 20 degrees C by the two-layer (UW/PFC) method accelerates ATP synthesis, which is essential for repairing damaged cells and protects vascular microcirculation. This makes it possible to resuscitate ischemically damaged pancreases faster. This method holds promise for pancreas-kidney transplantation from cardiac arrest donors.

Pancreas transplantation

Vascularized pancreas transplantation has assumed an increasing role in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Through 1994, over 6000 pancreas transplants had been performed worldwide, with over 80% being combined pancreas-kidney transplants. Overall 1-year patient survival exceeds 90% and graft survival (complete insulin independence) exceeds 70%. Although successful pancreas transplantation achieves euglycemia and complete insulin independence, this occurs at the expense of hyperinsulinemia and chronic immunosuppression. The net effect of these changes on diabetic complications in the long term remains to be determined. In the short term, improvement in the quality of life and possible prevention of further morbidity associated with diabetes makes pancreas transplantation an important therapeutic option, particularly when combined with a kidney transplant, in appropriately selected diabetic patients.

Pancreas transplantation for diabetes mellitus

Vascularized pancreas transplantation has assumed an increasing role in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Through 1993, over 5500 pancreas transplants have been performed worldwide, with over 80% being combined pancreas-kidney transplants. Overall one-year patient survival exceeds 90% and graft survival (complete insulin independence) exceeds 70%. Although successful pancreas transplantation achieves euglycemia and complete insulin independence, this occurs at the expense of hyperinsulinemia and chronic immunosuppression. The net result of these changes on diabetic complications in the long term remains to be determined. In the short term, improvement in the quality of life and possible prevention of further morbidity associated with diabetes makes pancreas transplantation an important therapeutic option, particularly when combined with a kidney transplant, in appropriately selected diabetic patients.

Surgical treatment of diabetes mellitus with pancreas transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared results and morbidity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients undergoing preemptive pancreas transplantation (PTx) either before dialysis or before the need for a kidney transplant with IDDM patients undergoing conventional combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) after the initiation of dialysis therapy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Combined PKT has become accepted generally as the best treatment option in carefully selected IDDM patients who either are dependent on dialysis or for whom dialysis is imminent. With improving results, the timing of PKT relative to the degree of nephropathy is evolving. However, it is not well established that the advantages of preemptive PTx can be achieved without incurring a detrimental effect on graft function or survival.

METHODS

Over a 4-year study period, data on the following 3 recipient groups were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively: 1) 38 IDDM patients undergoing combined PKT while on dialysis (PKT:D); 2) 44 IDDM patients undergoing preemptive PKT before dialysis (PKT:ND); and 3) 20 IDDM patients undergoing solitary PTx. All patients underwent whole organ PTx with bladder drainage and were treated with quadruple immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Actuarial 1-year patient survival is 100%, 98%, and 93%, respectively. One-year actuarial PTx survival (insulin-independence) is 92%, 95%, and 78%, respectively. The incidence of rejection, infection, operative complications, readmissions, and total hospital days was similar in the three groups. Long-term renal and pancreas allograft function and quality of life were similarly comparable. Rehabilitation potential favored the solitary PTx and PKT:ND groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preemptive PKT or solitary PTx performed earlier in the course of diabetes is associated with good results, facilitated rehabilitation, and may prevent further diabetic complications.