A comparison of rabbit antithymocyte serum and OKT3 as prophylaxis against renal allograft rejection

Thymoglobulin vs. ATG-Fresenius as Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplantation: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Thymoglobulin (THG) and antithymocyte globulin-Fresenius (ATG-F) have not been compared directly as induction therapies in kidney transplantation. Materials and Methods: We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare THG with ATG-F by pooling direct and indirect evidence. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were used to compare the superiority of one method over the other. Results: A total of 27 randomized controlled trials (RCT) were eligible for the network meta-analysis. Efficacy endpoints, as well as safety indicators, were statistically comparable. For efficacy endpoints, THG seemed inferior to ATG-F in preventing delayed graft function [odds ratio (OR): 1.27; SUCRA: 78% vs. 58%], patient deaths (OR: 2.78; SUCRA: 83% vs. 34%), and graft loss (OR: 1.40; SUCRA: 83% vs. 59%), but superior to ATG-F in biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR; OR: 0.59; SUCRA: 78% vs. 39%) and steroid-resistant BPAR prevention (OR: 0.61; SUCRA: 76% vs. 49%) within the first year. For safety endpoints, THG was associated with higher risk of infection (OR: 1.49, SUCRA: 79% vs. 54%), cytomegalovirus infection (OR: 1.04; SUCRA: 40% vs. 37%), de novo diabetes (OR: 1.10; SUCRA: 90% vs. 30%), and malignancy (OR: 8.40; SUCRA: 89% vs. 6%) compared to ATG-F. A subgroup analysis of patients at high risk for immunologic complications revealed similar results, but THG performed better for graft loss (OR: 0.82; SUCRA: 68% vs. 54%). Conclusion: ATG-F seemed to be more effective than THG in improving the short-term kidney transplantation outcomes. Prospective head-to-head comparison of THG and ATG-F with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up is still required.

Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Prolonging kidney transplant survival is an important clinical priority. Induction immunosuppression with antibody therapy is recommended at transplantation and non-depleting interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies (IL2Ra) are considered first line. It is suggested that recipients at high risk of rejection should receive lymphocyte-depleting antibodies but the relative benefits and harms of the available agents are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to: evaluate the relative and absolute effects of different antibody preparations (except IL2Ra) when used as induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients; determine how the benefits and adverse events vary for each antibody preparation; determine how the benefits and harms vary for different formulations of antibody preparation; and determine whether the benefits and harms vary in specific subgroups of recipients (e.g. children and sensitised recipients).

SEARCH METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies with placebo, no treatment, or other antibody therapy in adults and children who had received a kidney transplant.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies with placebo, no treatment, or other antibody therapy in adults and children who had received a kidney transplant.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 99 studies (269 records; 8956 participants; 33 with contemporary agents). Methodology was incompletely reported in most studies leading to lower confidence in the treatment estimates.Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) prevented acute graft rejection (17 studies: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.78). The benefits of ATG on graft rejection were similar when used with (12 studies: RR 0.61, 0.49 to 0.76) or without (5 studies: RR 0.65, 0.43 to 0.98) calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treatment. ATG (with CNI therapy) had uncertain effects on death (3 to 6 months, 3 studies: RR 0.41, 0.13 to 1.22; 1 to 2 years, 5 studies: RR 0.75, 0.27 to 2.06; 5 years, 2 studies: RR 0.94, 0.11 to 7.81) and graft loss (3 to 6 months, 4 studies: RR 0.60, 0.34 to 1.05; 1 to 2 years, 3 studies: RR 0.65, 0.36 to 1.19). The effect of ATG on death-censored graft loss was uncertain at 1 to 2 years and 5 years. In non-CNI studies, ATG had uncertain effects on death but reduced death-censored graft loss (6 studies: RR 0.55, 0.38 to 0.78). When CNI and older non-CNI studies were combined, a benefit was seen with ATG at 1 to 2 years for both all-cause graft loss (7 studies: RR 0.71, 0.53 to 0.95) and death-censored graft loss (8 studies: RR 0.55, 0.39 to 0.77) but not sustained longer term. ATG increased cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (6 studies: RR 1.55, 1.24 to 1.95), leucopenia (4 studies: RR 3.86, 2.79 to 5.34) and thrombocytopenia (4 studies: RR 2.41, 1.61 to 3.61) but had uncertain effects on delayed graft function, malignancy, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), and new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT).Alemtuzumab was compared to ATG in six studies (446 patients) with early steroid withdrawal (ESW) or steroid minimisation. Alemtuzumab plus steroid minimisation reduced acute rejection compared to ATG at one year (4 studies: RR 0.57, 0.35 to 0.93). In the two studies with ESW only in the alemtuzumab arm, the effect of alemtuzumab on acute rejection at 1 year was uncertain compared to ATG (RR 1.27, 0.50 to 3.19). Alemtuzumab had uncertain effects on death (1 year, 2 studies: RR 0.39, 0.06 to 2.42; 2 to 3 years, 3 studies: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.95), graft loss (1 year, 2 studies: RR 0.39, 0.13 to 1.30; 2 to 3 years, 3 studies: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.06), and death-censored graft loss (1 year, 2 studies: RR 0.38, 0.08 to 1.81; 2 to 3 years, 3 studies: RR 2.45, 95% CI 0.67 to 8.97) compared to ATG. Creatinine clearance was lower with alemtuzumab plus ESW at 6 months (2 studies: MD -13.35 mL/min, -23.91 to -2.80) and 2 years (2 studies: MD -12.86 mL/min, -23.73 to -2.00) compared to ATG plus triple maintenance. Across all 6 studies, the effect of alemtuzumab versus ATG was uncertain on all-cause infection, CMV infection, BK virus infection, malignancy, and PTLD. The effect of alemtuzumab with steroid minimisation on NODAT was uncertain, compared to ATG with steroid maintenance.Alemtuzumab plus ESW compared with triple maintenance without induction therapy had uncertain effects on death and all-cause graft loss at 1 year, acute rejection at 6 months and 1 year. CMV infection was increased (2 studies: RR 2.28, 1.18 to 4.40). Treatment effects were uncertain for NODAT, thrombocytopenia, and malignancy or PTLD.Rituximab had uncertain effects on death, graft loss, acute rejection and all other adverse outcomes compared to placebo.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ATG reduces acute rejection but has uncertain effects on death, graft survival, malignancy and NODAT, and increases CMV infection, thrombocytopenia and leucopenia. Given a 45% acute rejection risk without ATG induction, seven patients would need treatment to prevent one having rejection, while incurring an additional patient experiencing CMV disease for every 12 treated. Excluding non-CNI studies, the risk of rejection was 37% without induction with six patients needing treatment to prevent one having rejection.In the context of steroid minimisation, alemtuzumab prevents acute rejection at 1 year compared to ATG. Eleven patients would require treatment with alemtuzumab to prevent 1 having rejection, assuming a 21% rejection risk with ATG.Triple maintenance without induction therapy compared to alemtuzumab combined with ESW had similar rates of acute rejection but adverse effects including NODAT were poorly documented. Alemtuzumab plus steroid withdrawal would cause one additional patient experiencing CMV disease for every six patients treated compared to no induction and triple maintenance, in the absence of any clinical benefit. Overall, ATG and alemtuzumab decrease acute rejection at a cost of increased CMV disease while patient-centred outcomes (reduced death or lower toxicity) do not appear to be improved.

Analysis of interval-censored recurrent event processes subject to resolution

Interval-censored recurrent event data arise when the event of interest is not readily observed but the cumulative event count can be recorded at periodic assessment times. In some settings, chronic disease processes may resolve, and individuals will cease to be at risk of events at the time of disease resolution. We develop an expectation-maximization algorithm for fitting a dynamic mover-stayer model to interval-censored recurrent event data under a Markov model with a piecewise-constant baseline rate function given a latent process. The model is motivated by settings in which the event times and the resolution time of the disease process are unobserved. The likelihood and algorithm are shown to yield estimators with small empirical bias in simulation studies. Data are analyzed on the cumulative number of damaged joints in patients with psoriatic arthritis where individuals experience disease remission.

A copula model for marked point processes

Many chronic diseases feature recurring clinically important events. In addition, however, there often exists a random variable which is realized upon the occurrence of each event reflecting the severity of the event, a cost associated with it, or possibly a short term response indicating the effect of a therapeutic intervention. We describe a novel model for a marked point process which incorporates a dependence between continuous marks and the event process through the use of a copula function. The copula formulation ensures that event times can be modeled by any intensity function for point processes, and any multivariate model can be specified for the continuous marks. The relative efficiency of joint versus separate analyses of the event times and the marks is examined through simulation under random censoring. An application to data from a recent trial in transfusion medicine is given for illustration.

Decreased incidence of acute rejection in adolescent kidney transplant recipients using antithymocyte induction and triple immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection is a frequent event in pediatric renal transplantation; it can diminish allograft function and affect long-term outcome. Recent data from the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study indicates that the rate of acute rejection remains high despite current immunosuppressive regimens.

METHODS

In this retrospective series, we examined 37 pediatric renal transplant recipients who received induction doses of antithymocyte globulin combined with maintenance immunotherapy using tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The postoperative course was reviewed for initial and total hospital stay, number of rehospitalizations, evidence of posttransplant complications, graft fibrosis, and overall patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

Three episodes of acute rejection (8.1%) were recorded in the first year posttransplant. The median initial hospital stay for patients receiving a kidney transplant was 8 days. Patient and graft survival were 100% and 91.9% at 1 year, respectively. The incidence of viral infection (cytomegalovirus, BK virus, and Epstein-Barr virus) and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease remained low. Urinary tract infection and fluid and electrolyte complications were the main causes of posttransplant hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that induction with antithymocyte globulin and maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone should be considered a valuable tool in the management of children undergoing renal transplantation.

Pharmacologic approaches to composite tissue allograft

This article discusses the pharmacologic approaches and the most promising new compounds for composite tissue allograft tolerance. Although some approaches rely on a combination of immunosuppressive agents that act synergistically against rejection, other strategies use immunologic manipulation, including major histocompatibility complex matching, induction of chimerism, and use of monoclonal antibodies to abrogate the immune response. There is still a need, however, to reproduce these findings in species phylogenetically closer to humans. This may be the target of future research efforts, which may overcome the challenge of limb and face transplant rejection.

Delayed renal graft function: the influence of immunosuppression

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the influence of different immunosuppressive regimens on delayed renal graft function and progression of renal function in the first year after transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were divided into four groups according to the immunosuppressive regimen received: (1) rapamycin (Rap) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + methylprednisolone (MP) + daclizumab (Dmab); (n = 44); (2) tacrolimus (Tac) + MMF + MP + Dmab (n = 39); (3) cyclosporine (CsA) + MMF + MP + basiliximab (Bmab); (n = 30); (4) antithymocyte globulin (ATG) + MMF + MP and CsA after ATG withdrawal (n = 40). Data were analyzed using ANOVA and linear regression. Delayed graft function was defined as the need for hemodialysis posttransplantation.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the four groups in terms of gender, time on dialysis before transplantation, histocompatibility, donor age, and cold ischemia time. However, age (49.8, 50.4, 49.8, and 43.5 years, P < .05), panel reactive antibodies (22%, 39%, 27%, 34%, P < .05) and time of delayed graft function (12, 7, 3, 6 days, P < .05) were significantly different between the four groups. The time of delayed graft function depended on the immunosuppressive regimen, as well as donor and recipient age (P < .05). The creatinine clearance demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the four groups in the first month after transplantation (45, 46, 61, 53 mL/min, P < .05), though no further difference was observed at the month 12th.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of immunosuppressive therapy seems to substantially influence the time of recovery from delayed renal graft function, even though it does not seem to affect future graft function. Especially Rap, probably due to its potent antiproliferative effects, seems to prolong the length of graft recovery after renal transplantation.

Antibody induction therapy in renal transplant patients receiving calcineurin-inhibitor immunosuppressive regimens: a comparative review

Acute rejection during the first year post-transplant is a key predictor of graft survival after renal transplantation. Use of induction therapy with a lymphocyte-depleting agent or an interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonist can provide effective protection against rejection in the first critical weeks and months post-transplant. Polyclonal lymphocyte-depleting antibodies are associated with a low incidence of rejection but evidence of their benefit in terms of graft survival is lacking. Thymoglobulin appears to offer superior graft outcomes compared with generic antithymocyte globulin (ATG). The most frequent adverse events are symptoms of cytokine release syndrome, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and tachycardia; data on whether polyclonal antibody use increases the risk of lymphoma are conflicting. Muromonab CD3 (OKT3), a monoclonal lymphocyte-depleting antibody, is efficacious but a high incidence of cytokine release syndrome and increased risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease have limited its use. Following their recent introduction, the IL-2R antagonists basiliximab and daclizumab are now used widely, after randomized trials demonstrated that addition to calcineurin inhibitor-based therapy significantly reduced acute rejection by approximately 30-40%. Meta-analyses and registry analysis suggest that addition of an IL-2R antagonist may improve graft survival. The safety profile of IL-2R antagonists is indistinguishable from placebo, with no apparent difference in incidence of infection or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. IL-2R antagonists and polyclonal lymphocyte-depleting antibodies (with delayed cyclosporine) offer equivalent efficacy in standard-risk populations; in a trial of high-risk patients, acute rejection rate and graft outcomes were improved with Thymoglobulin. Tolerability is superior with IL-2R antagonists: cytokine release syndrome and hematologic disturbances (notably leukopenia) are significantly more frequent with polyclonal antibodies. Cytomegalovirus infection may also be more common with lymphocyte-depleting antibodies. Thus, in patients at high risk of graft loss, Thymoglobulin may be the preferred choice for induction therapy, while for all other patients, IL-2R antagonists should be considered first-line choice for induction therapy.

Delayed graft function and cast nephropathy associated with tacrolimus plus rapamycin use

Delayed graft function (DGF) occurs in 15 to 25% (range, 10 to 62%) of cadaveric kidney transplant recipients and up to 9% of living donor recipients. In addition to donor, recipient, and procedural factors, the choice of immunosuppression may influence the development of DGF. The impact of immunosuppression on DGF was studied. The frequency of DGF was evaluated in first cadaveric or living donor kidney allograft recipients (n = 144) transplanted at the University of Washington from November 1999 through September 1, 2001. Donor, recipient, and procedural factors, as well as biopsy results, were compared between patients who developed DGF and those who did not. DGF was more common in patients treated with rapamycin than without (25% versus 8.9%, P = 0.02) and positively correlated with rapamycin dose (P = 0.008). In those developing DGF, the duration of posttransplant dialysis increased with donor age (P = 0.003) but decreased with mycophenolate mofetil use (P = 0.01). All biopsies during episodes of DGF demonstrated changes of acute tubular injury. Of the patients with tubular injury, 12 treated with rapamycin and tacrolimus developed intratubular cast formation indistinguishable from myeloma cast nephropathy. Histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural studies indicated that these casts were composed at least in part of degenerating renal tubular epithelial cells. These findings suggest that rapamycin therapy exerts increased toxicity on tubular epithelial cells and/or retards healing, leading to an increased incidence of DGF. Additionally, rapamycin treatment combined with a calcineurin inhibitor may lead to extensive tubular cell injury and death and a unique form of cast nephropathy.

Analysis of repeated events

Events that may occur repeatedly for individual subjects are of interest in many medical studies. We review methods of analysis for repeated events, emphasizing that the approach taken in a given study should allow clinical questions to be addressed as directly as possible. Methods based on full models for event processes as well as on simpler 'marginal' assumptions are considered. The treatment of dependent terminating events related to the recurrent events is also discussed. We apply various methods of analysis to studies involving pulmonary exacerbations in persons with cystic fibrosis, and the occurrence of bone metastases and skeletal events in cancer patients, respectively. Most of the methodology considered can be implemented with existing software.

Contemporary immunosuppression in renal transplantation

Over the past 3 decades, renal allograft survival has improved significantly as a result of the development of powerful immunosuppressive agents. Nevertheless, the overall half-life of renal allografts has increased marginally during that time period, owing to drug-related nephrotoxicity and chronic rejection. New immunosuppressive agents are being evaluated because of the need for a reduction in the dose of nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids. Additional agents have demonstrated the ability to retard the onset of chronic rejection in preclinical transplant models. In concert with these efforts, approaches are in development to alleviate the ever increasing shortage of donor organs, including the as yet unrealized goals of successful and practical xenotransplantation and the bioartificial kidney. Further identification and development of novel agents that target the specific components of the allograft response will provide the key to the achievement of donor-specific tolerance, the "Holy Grail" of solid organ transplantation.

Immunosuppressive agents in transplantation: mechanisms of action and current anti-rejection strategies

Over the past century, the concept of interfering with the immune response at various sites by blocking the formation, stimulation, proliferation, and differentiation of lymphocytes has led to relentless development of new immunosuppressive drugs. These agents are associated with reduced risk of short- and long-term toxicity and have dramatically improved allograft and patient survival, especially in recipients of solid organ transplants. Current protocols in such patients are nearly all calcineurin-inhibitor based, using cyclosporine or tacrolimus, as part of dual, triple, or sequential therapy. This review focuses on agents currently in clinical use at transplant centers in United States. The drugs are described in terms of their basic mechanisms of action, therapeutic uses, clinical studies, and adverse effects. In addition, the efficacy and toxicity of a few promising new therapeutic approaches are examined. Finally, important challenges regarding pharmacological immunosuppression as it relates to solid organ and composite tissue allotransplantation are discussed.

Results of the double-blind, randomized, multicenter, phase III clinical trial of Thymoglobulin versus Atgam in the treatment of acute graft rejection episodes after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Thymoglobulin, a rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin, was compared with Atgam, a horse anti-human thymocyte globulin for the treatment of acute rejection after renal transplantation.

METHODS

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial with enrollment stratification based on standardized histology (Banff grading) was conducted. Subjects received 7-14 days of Thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg/ day) or Atgam (15 mg/kg/day). The primary end point was rejection reversal (return of serum creatinine level to or below the day 0 baseline value).

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients were enrolled at 25 transplant centers in the United States. No differences in demographics or transplant characteristics were noted. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that Thymoglobulin had a higher rejection reversal rate than Atgam (88% versus 76%, P=0.027, primary end point). Day 30 graft survival rates (Thymoglobulin 94% and Atgam 90%, P=0.17), day 30 serum creatinine levels as a percentage of baseline (Thymoglobulin 72% and Atgam 80%; P=0.43), and improvement in posttreatment biopsy results (Thymoglobulin 65% and Atgam 50%; P=0.15) were not statistically different. T-cell depletion was maintained more effectively with Thymoglobulin than Atgam both at the end of therapy (P=0.001) and at day 30 (P=0.016). Recurrent rejection, at 90 days after therapy, occurred less frequently with Thymoglobulin (17%) versus Atgam (36%) (P=0.011). A similar incidence of adverse events, post-therapy infections, and 1-year patient and graft survival rates were observed with both treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Thymoglobulin was found to be superior to Atgam in reversing acute rejection and preventing recurrent rejection after therapy in renal transplant recipients.

Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival

Delayed graft function (DGF) may be associated with diminished kidney allograft survival. We studied the risk factors that lead to nonimmediate function of a renal allograft and the consequences of DGF on short- and long-term renal transplant survival. Data from the U.S. Renal Data System were used to measure the relationships among cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, acute rejection, and graft survival in 37,216 primary cadaveric renal transplants (1985-1992). These relationships were investigated using the unconditional logistic and Cox multivariate regression methods. Cold ischemia time was strongly associated with DGF, with a 23% increase in the risk of DGF for every 6 hr of cold ischemia (P<0.001). Acute transplant rejection occurred more frequently in grafts with delayed function (37% vs. 20%; odds ratio=2.25, P=0.001). DGF was independently predictive of 5-year graft loss (relative risk=1.53, P<0.001). The presence of both early acute rejection and DGF portended a dismal 5-year graft survival rate of 35%. Zero-HLA mismatch conferred a 10-15% improvement in 1- and 5-year graft survival regardless of early functional status of the allograft. However, the 5-year graft survival rate in HLA-mismatched kidneys without DGF was significantly higher than that of zero-mismatched kidneys with DGF (63% vs. 51%; P<0.001). DGF independently portends a significant reduction in short- and long-term graft survival. Delayed function and early rejection episodes exerted an additive adverse effect on allograft survival. The deleterious impact of delayed function is comparatively more severe than that of poor HLA matching.

Pharmacology of immunosuppressive medications used in renal diseases and transplantation

As understanding of the molecular basis for the immune response has expanded rapidly, so have the possibilities for designing therapeutic interventions that are more effective, more specific, and safer than current treatment options. The promise of therapeutic advances in the future is based on the rapidly expanding insights into the pathogenesis of abnormal immunologic reactions. Nowhere is the understanding of molecular mechanisms, pathophysiology, and targeted therapy more relevant than in the field of renal transplantation, which makes up much of the clinical database for the use of immunosuppressive therapy for renal disease. Despite the recent advances in basic immunology, clinical validation of new agents and approaches is lacking for most drugs at present. This review will focus in the pharmacology of agents used in the therapy of immunologic renal disease and in renal transplantation. It should be recognized that clinical pharmacology and experience with newer agents is limited, and potential utility is based largely on experimental data.

Muromonab CD3: a reappraisal of its pharmacology and use as prophylaxis of solid organ transplant rejection

The murine monoclonal antibody muromonab CD3 (OKT3) is directed against the CD3 antigen on peripheral human T cells and effectively blocks all T cell function. Prophylaxis with muromonab CD3 (5mg intravenously once daily for 10 to 14 days) as induction therapy together with corticosteroids, azathioprine and delayed cyclosporin (sequential therapy) optimises early graft function by delaying the potentially nephrotoxic and hepatotoxic effects of cyclosporin until graft function is established. Although clinical data are limited (by inconsistencies in trial design and trial size), prophylactic muromonab CD3-based sequential therapy is significantly more effective than standard triple therapy in the prophylaxis of allograft rejection in renal and hepatic, but not cardiac, transplant recipients. Benefits are particularly notable in patients with delayed graft function. No significant between-treatment differences in patient survival have been observed. The overall efficacy of muromonab CD3- and polyclonal-based prophylactic regimens appears to be similar, although results vary between investigators and confirmation is needed. An anti-interleukin-2 monoclonal antibody-based prophylactic regimen improved graft and patient survival compared with muromonab CD3-based prophylaxis in hepatic transplant recipients. Antimuromonab CD3 antibodies may develop; however, muromonab CD3 may be successfully reused in patients with low titres. Preliminary pharmacoeconomic data suggest that mean drug costs are greater with quadruple immunosuppressive regimens containing muromonab CD3, antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) than with triple therapy. Drug costs with prophylactic muromonab CD3-based regimens were similar or greater than those with polyclonal-based protocols. The first doses of muromonab CD3 are associated with the 'cytokine-release syndrome'. More severe first-dose events include aseptic meningitis, intragraft thromboses, seizures and potentially fatal pulmonary oedema. The incidence and/or severity of cytomegalovirus infection with prophylactic muromonab CD3 based immunosuppression is similar to or greater than that with triple therapy and ATG- or ALG-based regimens. However, the risk of infection and also the observed increase in lymphoproliferative disorders appears to be related to the degree of immunosuppression rather than to the drug itself Thus, sequential muromonab CD3-based therapy is more effective than standard triple therapy (in renal and hepatic transplant recipients) and appears to be similar to that of polyclonal-based regimens in the prophylaxis of transplant rejection. Although the routine use of prophylactic muromonab CD3 in low-risk patients with primary graft function does not appear to be justified, prophylactic muromonab CD3-based therapy has a role in patients at high risk of rejection.

Delayed development of obliterative bronchiolitis syndrome with OKT3 after unilateral lung transplantation. A plea for multicenter immunosuppressive trials

There is no consensus regarding the optimal induction immunosuppression regimen after lung transplantation (LT). In addition to the potential benefit of a reduced incidence of early acute allograft rejection, cytolytic induction immunosuppression may impact on long-term allograft function. We retrospectively assessed our incidence of obliterative bronchiolitis syndrome (OBS) stages Ia and IIa in LT survivors given two different cytolytic induction immunosuppression regimens: (between March 1989 and October 1990) OKT3 (5 mg/d)x10 to 14 days (n=11) vs (between November 1990 and April 1993) Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin (MALG) (10 to 15 mg/kgdx5 to 7 days. Cyclosporine (CSA) (whole blood polyclonal assay=600 to 800 ng/mL), azathioprine (1 to 2 mg/kg/d), and maintenance prednisone (0.2 mg/kg/d) were similar. Surveillance spirometry was performed monthly, in accordance with accepted American Thoracic Society criteria. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsies (TBBs) were performed for clinical indications. Surveillance TBBs were not performed during the era of this study. As defined by the ISHLT "Working Formulation for the Standardization of Nomenclature and for Clinical Staging of Chronic Dysfunction in Lung Allografts," latencies to development of OBS stages Ia and IIa were determined by Kaplan-Meir analysis. Stepwise regression (Cox proportional hazards model) was performed for the variables: cytolytic induction regimen, episodes cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis, episodes CMV infection, serologic CMV donor (+): recipient (-) mismatch, prior pregnancy, HLA (A,B,DR +/- DQ) mismatches, episodes greater than grade A1 acute cellular rejection (ACR). We found that the OKT3 cohort experienced longer latencies for OBS stages Ia and IIa. Latencies to OBS stages Ia for OKT3 ve MALG were 962 +/- 65 vs 354 +/- 85 days (X +/- SEM) respectively. Brookmeyer-Crowley 95% confidence intervals for median latencies were 744 to 1,180 vs 266 to 510 days for OKT3 vs MALG, respectively. The Cox model was significant only for the variable of the induction cytolytic immunosuppression regimen (p=0.0015). By physiologic criteria, a longer course of OKT3 appeared superior to the short-course MALG protocol in delaying chronic lung allograft dysfunction. These effects may be related either to inherent differences in the antilymphocyte preparations or, alternatively, the difference in duration of treatment between groups. Surveillance TBB and treatment of detected occult ACR may serve to negate the observed differences in latencies for OBS.