Kidney function after 1:1 conversion to the cyclosporine microemulsion formulation in children with liver allografts

Cardiac transplant experience with cyclosporine

The advent of cyclosporine 20 years ago was a major advance in the field of solid organ transplantation. Its use enabled directed immunosuppression with a consequent decrease in the incidence of graft failure, acute rejection, and systemic infection. The early oil-based preparation, however, was difficult to administer and had limited bioavailability and unpredictable pharmacokinetics. The drug also has a fairly narrow therapeutic window with major long-term side effects, which include nephrotoxicity, malignancy, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. The introduction of a microemulsion preparation (Neoral) with improved bioavailability has been associated with lower rates of rejection and comparable tolerability, therefore allowing the use of lower doses. Traditionally cyclosporine toxicity has been minimized by monitoring trough levels. Monitoring of levels 2 hours after dosing may provide a more accurate determination of cyclosporine exposure. The next phase in cardiac transplantation immunosuppression will most likely see a significantly diminished role for cyclosporine with the introduction of newer, more potent immunosuppressive agents with more favorable side-effect profiles. These agents, which include mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, and everolimus, also hold the promise of having a major impact on the development of transplant vasculopathy, which up to now has been an important determinant of limiting long-term allograft survival.

Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations

Immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant recipients is changing as a consequence of the increasing number of available immunosuppressive agents. Generic and other new formulations are now emerging onto the market, clinical experience is growing, and it is expected that clinicians should tailor immunosuppressive protocols to individual patients by optimising dosages and drugs according to the maturation and clinical status of the child. Most information about the clinical pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs in paediatrics is centred on cyclosporin, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal and liver transplant recipients; data regarding other immunosuppressants and transplant types are limited. Although the clinical pharmacokinetics of these drugs in paediatric transplant recipients are still under investigation, it is evident that the pharmacokinetic parameters observed in adults may not be applicable to children, especially in younger age groups. In general, patients younger than 5 years old show higher clearance rates irrespective of the organ transplanted or drug used. Another important factor that frequently affects clearance in this patient population is the post-transplant time. In accordance with these findings, and in contrast with the usual under-dosage in children, the need for higher dosages in younger recipients and during the early post-transplant period seems evident. To achieve the best compromise between prevention of rejection and toxicity, dosage individualisation is required and this can be achieved through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This approach is particularly useful to ensure the cost-effective management of paediatric transplant recipients in whom the pharmacokinetic behaviour, target concentrations for clinical use and optimal dosage strategies of a particular drug may not yet be well defined. Although TDM may be a tool for improving immunosuppressive therapy, there is little information concerning its positive contribution to clinical events, including outcomes, for paediatric patients. Substantial information to support the use of TDM exists for cyclosporin and, to a lesser extent, for tacrolimus, but a diversity of options affects their implementation in the clinical setting. The role of TDM in therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus has yet to be defined regarding both methods and clinical indications. Pharmacodynamic monitoring appears more suited to other immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, corticosteroids and monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. If coupled with pharmacokinetic measurements, such monitoring would allow earlier and more precise optimisation of therapy. Very few population pharmacokinetic studies have been carried out in paediatric transplant patients. This type of study is needed so that techniques such as Bayesian forecasting can be applied to optimise immunosuppressive therapy in paediatric transplant patients.

Two-hour cyclosporine concentration determination: an appropriate tool to monitor neoral therapy?

Cyclosporine is a critical dose drug for which individualisation by therapeutic drug monitoring is indisputable. Current evidence suggests that a single concentration (C2) taken two hours after cyclosporine administration with the microemulsion formulation better predicts exposure and events than the trough concentration (C(0)), which is routinely used for adjusting the dosage of this drug. Studies have shown that the greatest calcineurin inhibition and the maximum inhibition of IL-2 production occur in the first 1 to 2 hours after dosing. These findings support the concept that the C2 level better reflects immunosuppressive efficacy than the trough concentration. Preliminary data from an outcome study in liver transplant recipients have shown that the incidence of biopsy proven moderate to severe acute rejection was significantly lower in patients managed by C2 monitoring compared with those monitored by C(0). The critical importance of achieving adequate cyclosporine exposure during the first 3 to 5 posttransplant days to prevent acute rejection has been documented in prospective studies with de novo renal and liver transplant recipients. Conversion of maintenance liver and heart transplant patients to C2 monitoring resulted in an amelioration of renal function. Time-dependent target values have been proposed for liver and renal transplant recipients. These require further prospective validation. For routine monitoring of C2 levels on-site validated dilution guidelines are necessary for most of the available immunoassays. C2 monitoring necessitates further organizational requirements which may be judged differently between transplant centers. In particular during the early posttransplant period C2 monitoring is a promising new option to make immunosuppressive therapy with the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine safer and more efficient.

New developments in the immunosuppressive drug monitoring of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and azathioprine

The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus form the cornerstones of most immunosuppression protocols. Because of their variable pharmacokinetics, and their narrow therapeutic indices, post-transplant immunosuppressive drug monitoring is an essential part of patient care to minimize the risks of toxicity or acute rejection. Furthermore, a reduction in the rate of acute rejection has been shown to result in a lower rate of graft loss due to chronic rejection. The introduction of the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine with its more consistent bioavailability has renewed interest in the use of alternative sampling strategies to the trough cyclosporine concentration. Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations support the concept that determination of cyclosporine during the absorption phase (0-4 h) might offer a better prediction of cyclosporine immunosuppressive efficacy. Initial investigations suggest that monitoring a 2-h postdose concentration C(2) may provide a more efficacious alternative to trough monitoring for optimizing therapy with Neoral. Tacrolimus has a 10- to 100-fold greater in vitro immunosuppressive activity compared with cyclosporine. Consistent with its greater potency, therapeutic whole blood trough concentrations for tacrolimus are around 20-fold lower than the corresponding cyclosporine concentrations. The correlation between toxicity and tacrolimus trough concentrations appears to be stronger than that for acute rejection. The results from a concentration-ranging trial in primary kidney-transplantation and liver-transplantation trials all found a significant relationship between toxicity and tacrolimus trough levels. Azathioprine is converted in vivo to 6-mercaptopurine, which is subsequently metabolized to the pharmacologically active 6-thioguanine nucleotides. The latter are also responsible for the cytotoxic side effects. Reliance on blood counts to monitor azathioprine therapy can be misleading, and they do not provide information on immunosuppresive efficacy. More pertinent information can be obtained through the measurement of thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity and the quantification of intracellular 6-thioguanine nucleotides concentrations in red blood cells. Prospective studies have demonstrated the clinical utility of determining 6-thioguanine nucleotides to individualise immunosuppressive therapy with azathioprine not only in the field of transplantation, but also in inflammatory bowel disease.

The impact of (1:1) cyclosporine A conversion to its microemulsion formulation on the kidney function of patients with cardiac allografts

Due to the large variations in the absorption and bioavailability of conventional cyclosporine A (CyA), 1:1 (mg:mg) conversion to its microemulsion formulation (Neoral) has been advocated in transplant recipients. However, the renal hazards and biochemical effects of such conversions and not known in cardiac transplant recipients. In this study, 68 cardiac transplant recipients who were receiving conventional CyA, for a period of 61.3 +/- 36.0 (mean +/- standard error (SE)) months, were switched to the microemulsion formulation (Neoral). The biochemical and renal function tests were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months pre- and post-conversion of CyA. The results obtained post-conversion were compared with those of the baseline (pre-conversion). Serum creatinine and uric acid levels significantly increased post-conversion to the microemulsion formulation. One patient required discontinuation of the microemulsion in an attempt to reverse severe renal failure. In spite of a significant decrease in the microemulsion dose at 6, 9 and 12 months, there was a significant increase in the whole blood CyA trough levels at 9 and 12 months of conversion. There was no significant change in blood pressure, serum total cholesterol or potassium post-conversion. Our results suggest that after 1:1 (mg:mg) conversion of CyA to its microemulsion formulation, there will be a significant rise in serum creatinine, uric acid and whole blood trough CyA levels necessitating significant dose reduction. This effect is probably due to the markedly improved absorption and bioavailability of the latter.

An open-label study of the safety and tolerability of converting stable liver transplant recipients to neoral

Neoral is a new formulation of cyclosporine based on microemulsion technology, designed to provide increased and more reliable absorption of the medication. The aim of this study was to assess whether conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral provides safe and effective oral immunosuppression in stable liver transplant recipients. We studied 59 stable liver transplant recipients (being treated with prednisone, azathioprine, and Sandimmune). All patients were enrolled in an open-label study in which they were converted from Sandimmune to Neoral therapy at a dose ratio of 1:1. Thirty-nine patients underwent duct-to-duct bile duct anastomoses, and 20 underwent Roux-en-Y bile duct anastomoses. After conversion, the Neoral dosage was adjusted on the basis of trough levels measured at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12. To assess safety and tolerability, we prospectively obtained serial information, including laboratory data and information on side effects. Standard statistical methodology was used. A total of 59 patients (23 men, 36 women; mean age, 55 years; mean follow-up after liver transplantation, 5.7 years) completed 3 months of follow-up after conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral. There were 32 dosage changes; 22 (69%) required reduction of the Neoral dose. Mean cyclosporine trough levels remained above 100 ng/mL during the follow-up period. There were no significant differences between cyclosporine levels in patients with duct-to-duct or Roux-en-Y bile duct anastomoses. There were no episodes of rejection during the 3-month follow-up period. The side effect profile was similar in both groups, except for a significant reduction in the number of patients with headaches after Neoral conversion. Liver transplant recipients can safely be converted from Sandimmune to Neoral. Neoral was well tolerated in this population.