Interferon-alpha and ribavirin for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

The effect and safety of the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C infection after orthotopic liver transplantation with pegylated interferon α2b and ribavirin

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent hepatitis C infection in the posttransplant setting is a serious problem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, indications, optimal time of administration and adequate duration of antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon alpha 2 b (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RIB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2003 and 2009, 16 patients received antiviral therapy (PEG-IFN: 0.8-1.6 μg/kg/wk, RIB 800-1200 mg/d) for at least 6 months. Patients with a biochemical without a virologicalresponse after 12 months of therapy received antiviral treatment for a further 6 months. Hepatitis C virus load was determined at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after start of therapy. Liver biopsy was performed in all patients before the beginning and after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

The mean period of antiviral therapy was 14 months. The four patients who received the full-length treatment (12 months, 33%) showed sustained virological responses (SVR) and 8 showed virological and biochemical responses (VR, BR). Patients with SVR showed significant improvement in the grading and staging of HAI (histological activity index; P=.03). Nine patients had several side effects under antiviral treatment. Acute rejection episodes were not observed.

CONCLUSION

The antiviral treatment combination using PEG-IFN and RIB for recurrent hepatitis C is effective procedure. The SVR of 33% after 12 months of treatment with significant improvement in HAI grading and staging and stable HAI in all treated patients favor early initiation and 12-month administration of antiviral treatment. Furthermore, all patients with BR without VR, who underwent antiviral treatment for a further 6 months, achieved a VR. However, the optimal duration of treatment needs to be investigated in large prospective studies.

Treatment of genotype 4 hepatitis C recurring after liver transplantation using a combination of pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is universal and tends to be more aggressive. Data on post-transplant HCV genotype 4 treatment is scarce. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN) in combination with ribavirin in the treatment of recurrent HCV genotype 4 after LT.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients infected with HCV genotype 4 were treated with PEG-IFN alpha-2a at a dose of 180 μg/week in addition to 800 mg/day of ribavirin (the dose was adjusted within the tolerated range of 400-1,200 mg). Pretreatment liver biopsies were obtained from all patients. Biochemical and virological markers were assessed before, during, and after treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (88%) achieved an early virological response (EVR) (12 patients tested negative for HCV-RNA). Fifteen (60%) and 14 patients (56%) achieved an end of treatment virological response (ETVR) and a sustained virological response (SVR), respectively. Five patients had advanced pretreatment liver fibrosis. Pretreatment ALT was elevated in 24 patients (96%). The most common adverse effects were flu-like symptoms and cytopenia. Eighteen patients (72%) required erythropoietin alpha and/or granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as a supportive measure. One patient developed severe rejection complicated by sepsis, renal failure, and death. Other adverse effects included depression, mild rejection, impotence, itching, and vitiligo.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin achieved SVR in 56% of liver transplant recipients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection. The combination was relatively safe and exhibited a low rate of treatment withdrawal.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection recurrence after liver transplantation: an overview

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the major indication for liver transplantation worldwide. Its recurrence is virtually universal. Once reinfection is established, progression to cirrhosis occurs in 25%-30% of recipients within 5 years. Several studies have attempted to identify the ideal antiviral treatment for liver transplant recipients. At present, the management of recurrent HCV infection in liver transplant recipients is based on widely accepted indications, which represent a reliable guide to identify the "ideal" candidate for therapy, when therapy should be started, and what is to be expected in terms of side effects and response to treatment.

Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

A significant proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection develop liver cirrhosis and complications of end-stage liver disease over two to three decades and require liver transplantation, however, reinfection is common and leads to further adverse events under immunosuppression. Pretransplant antiviral or preemptive therapy is limited to mildly decompensated patients due to poor tolerance. The mainstay of management represents directed antiviral therapy after evidence of recurrence of chronic hepatitis C. Combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy is the current standard treatment with sustained viral response rates of 25% to 45%. The rate is lower than that in the immunocompetent population, partly due to the high prevalence of intolerability. To date, there is no general consensus regarding the antiviral treatment modality, timing, or dosing for HCV in patients with advanced liver disease and after liver transplantation. New anti-HCV drugs to delay disease progression or to enhance viral clearance are necessary.

A pilot study: longer duration of posttransplant hepatitis C virus therapy may increase the sustained response rate

BACKGROUND

Although end of treatment virological responses are similar in posttransplant patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis C virus infection and nontransplant patients, the sustained virological response rate is lower in the posttransplant setting. We investigated the efficacy of a longer duration (3 years) of therapy.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with biopsy-proven recurrent hepatitis C were included in the study. In the first year of therapy, all patients were treated with a standard regimen of interferon alpha 2b 3MU 3 times in a week plus ribavirin (800 to 1000 mg/d). After the availability of pegylated interferon, patients were converted to pegylated interferon (1.5 microg/kg body weight). Hepatitis C virus RNA was evaluated at months 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, and 42. If hepatitis C virus RNA was negative at month 12, the patients continued treatment for 36 months.

RESULTS

Hepatitis C virus RNA was negative in six patients at 12 months, including two who became hepatitis C virus RNA negative after 3 months; two, after 6 months; and two, after 12 months of therapy. Those six continued treatment completing 3 years of treatment with a sustained virological response. Four of those six patients with sustained virological response required colony-stimulating factors during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although the hepatitis C virus RNA status of patients at 12 weeks is a good marker to predict a sustained virological response in the nontransplant setting, it is not valid in posttransplant patients. A prolonged duration of therapy for patients who are viral responders at 12 months may prevent recurrence and increase the sustained virological response rate.

Long-term antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation in nonresponders: biochemical, virological, and histological impact

More than 50% of patients with a recurrent posttransplant hepatitis C virus infection fail to respond to antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of a long-term antiviral treatment maintained for more than 48 weeks. Seventy treated patients, with a histological follow-up > 1 year, were enrolled in this observational, retrospective study. The duration of antiviral treatment, tolerance, and occurrence of virological, biochemical, and histological responses were recorded. Thirty-two patients were nonresponders after 48 weeks of treatment. Combined antiviral therapy was maintained for >12 months in 26 and for >18 months in 21. Twelve patients had to discontinue their treatment. At 48 weeks, the rates of virological response and sustained virological response were 37% and 24.3%, respectively; at the end of the follow-up, they were 48.5% and 35.7%. Virological response was significantly associated with a higher incidence of biochemical and histological response, regardless of its time of occurrence (before or after 6 months). Even in the absence of virological response, the rate of progression of fibrosis was significantly slowed in patients treated for more than 6 months. Our results show the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of long-term antiviral therapy in nonresponder patients with a recurrent posttransplant hepatitis C virus infection.

Impact of pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment on graft survival in liver transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C infection

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation for HCV-related end stage liver disease. Although previous studies have shown a short-term effect of interferon-based treatment on fibrosis progression, it is unclear whether this translates to improved graft survival. We evaluated whether treatment of recurrent HCV leads to an improved graft survival. Cohort study included consecutive HCV patients who underwent liver transplantation between 1 January 1995 and 1 January 2005 in the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Two hundred and fifteen patients were included in the study. During a median follow-up of 4.4 years (interquartile range 2.2-6.6), 165 patients (77%) had biopsy-proven recurrent HCV infection confirmed by serum HCV RNA testing. Seventy-eight patients were treated. There were no differences in MELD-score, fibrosis stage or time towards HCV recurrence between treated and untreated patients at time of recurrence. There was a trend for greater frequency of acute cellular rejection among untreated patients. The incidence of graft failure was lower for patients treated within 6 months of recurrence compared to patients not treated within this time-period (log rank p = 0.002). Time-dependent multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that treatment of recurrent HCV infection was statistically significantly associated with a decreased risk of overall graft failure (hazard ratio 0.34; CI 0.15-0.77, p = 0.009) and a decreased risk of graft failure due to recurrent HCV (hazard ratio 0.24; CI 0.08-0.69, p = 0.008). In conclusion, although a cause and effect relationship cannot be established, treatment of recurrent HCV infection after liver transplantation is associated with a reduced risk of graft failure.

Sustained clearance of serum hepatitis C virus-RNA independently predicts long-term survival in liver transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of virological response to long-term antiviral therapy using interferon plus ribavirin on survival of 30 liver transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C. Mean treatment duration is currently 46 months (range: 3-144 months). Sustained clearance of serum hepatitis C virus RNA was achieved in 18 patients (60%). Allograft biopsies demonstrated fibrosis progression in seven virological nonresponders (66.6%), and none of the recipients with viral elimination (0%; P<0.001). Univariately, low pretransplant viral loads, the absence of cytomegalovirus infection, as well as biochemical and virological response to antiviral therapy indicated a positive impact on outcome (P<0.05). Only antiviral treatment induced clearance of viremia, however, was identified as independent predictor of long-term survival (P=0.02). Our data indicate that an antiviral combination should aim at viral eradication in liver transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C, because it improves survival.

Antiviral maintenance treatment with interferon and ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: pilot study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate efficacy of a long-term antiviral maintenance therapy (AMT) with interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation received AMT with interferon and ribavirin, following 12 months of a basic antiviral combination treatment. Allograft function, viremia loads and allograft morphology were evaluated continuously.

RESULTS

After 12 months of basic antiviral therapy, 14 patients (66.6%) had achieved initial clearance of viremia levels, and 17 recipients (81%) demonstrated normalization of allograft function, respectively. Inflammation score declined significantly (6.0 vs 3.9; P = 0.002), while stage of fibrosis remained unchanged. In virological responders maintenance therapy led to further regression of inflammation score (4.0 at baseline vs 3.1 at 24 months AMT) and fibrosis score (1.6 at baseline vs 1.1 at 24 months AMT). Despite persistence of viremia levels, continued antiviral therapy prevented progression to severe allograft inflammation in virological non-responders. Hematologic adverse effects resulted in treatment discontinuation in seven patients (33.3%).

CONCLUSION

Long-term AMT, if tolerable, might be an effective approach for preventing progression to severe allograft fibrosis and thereby improving long-term survival in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C.

Conversion to mycophenolate mofetil for modulating recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of cyclosporine A (CsA) taper in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy on recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) in liver transplant patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nineteen liver recipients with serologically and morphologically confirmed recurrent HCV were included in this study. After MMF introduction up to a maximum dose of 2000 mg/day, CsA dose was significantly tapered. In the control group immunosuppression remained unchanged. Allograft function and morphology, viral loads, and renal function were analyzed continuously.

RESULTS

MMF treatment was well tolerated without risk of rejection. Allograft fibrosis progressed in 6 patients of the MMF group (66.6%) and none (0%) of the controls at 12-month biopsy (P=0.005). Moreover, aminotransferases and viral loads increased slightly in the MMF-treated patients. Renal function improved significantly (serum creatinine: 239.3+/-90.2 micromol/L vs. 175.8+/-46.0 micromol/L; P=0.008) in the treatment group, while deteriorating (serum creatinine: 156.8+/-44.6 micromol/L vs. 214.8+/-120.1 micromol/L; P=0.06) in the controls.

CONCLUSION

MMF introduction allows a safe CsA taper in HCV-positive liver transplant patients and results in significant improvement of renal function. However, there seems to be a risk of marked progression of HCV-induced allograft injury.

Managing chronic hepatitis C in the difficult-to-treat patient

Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and disease-related complications - among them cirrhosis and liver failure - pose a particular management challenge. Some of these patients may fail to respond to current therapy (non-responders), and some are affected so severely that treatment puts them at an unacceptable risk for complications. Treatment with pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin improves hepatic enzyme levels and eradicates the virus in approximately 50% of patients; however, a significant number of patients do not respond to therapy or relapse following treatment discontinuation. Several viral, hepatic and patient-related factors influence response to IFN therapy; many of these factors cannot be modified to improve long-term outcomes. Identifying risk factors and measuring viral load early in the treatment can help to predict response to IFN therapy and determine the need to modify or discontinue treatment. Retreatment options for patients who have failed therapy are limited. Retreatment with peg-IFN has been successful in some patients who exhibit an inadequate response to conventional IFN treatment, particularly those who have relapsed. Consensus IFN, another option in treatment-resistant patients, has demonstrated efficacy in the retreatment of non-responders and relapsers. Although the optimal duration of retreatment and the benefits and safety of maintenance therapy have not been determined, an extended duration is likely needed. This article reviews the risk factors for HCV treatment resistance and discusses the assessment and management of difficult-to-treat patients.

Chronic ductopenic rejection in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin

BACKGROUND

Interferon use for post liver transplantation (LT) recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) has not consistently been associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR). We examined the incidence of chronic ductopenic rejection (CR) in patients receiving pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin (PEG) to treat recurrent HCV.

METHODS

A chart review of 12 patients developing CR while receiving an escalating dose regimen of PEG with protocol liver biopsies every 6 months was conducted. Values are shown as median (range).

RESULTS

Twelve of the 70 patients treated with PEG developed CR. Median age at LT was 53 (37-63) years; immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus or cyclosporine with prednisone. PEG was started at 3.6 (0.2-13.5) years after LT. Two patients had one episode of ACR before PEG. Four patients had first ACR while receiving PEG. CR was diagnosed after 12 (4-17) months of PEG; by then 8 patients had undetectable HCV-RNA. Tacrolimus and cyclosporine levels (ng/mL) were 7.9 (3.2-18.9) and 76 (71-93) before PEG, and 6.9 (3.7-9.7) and 130 (81-153) at CR. Six patients were treated more than 1 year with PEG; three had undetectable HCV-RNA when CR was diagnosed. Five patients are being treated for CR; one has been listed for LT; two patients were retransplanted. Five patients died as a result of sepsis partially related to CR.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with pegylated-interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin may trigger rapidly progressive CR in patients with therapeutic immunosuppressive trough levels, with or without first inducing ACR.

Management of hepatitis C virus in the transplant patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, with 170 to 190 million people infected worldwide. The treatment of choice for patients who have HCV-related cirrhosis with or without hepatocellular carcinoma is liver transplantation. Virologic recurrence is constant after transplantation and results in chronic hepatitis in the vast majority. HCV infection now can be cured in a substantial proportion of liver transplant recipients. This review highlights the available strategies to improve outcome, including modification of factors that affect disease progression and the efficacy of antiviral therapy.

Hepatitis C virus re-infection: new perspectives

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection of the liver graft has been recognized to be one of the most important factors that determines prognosis and outcome after liver transplantation in HCV-positive patients. Graft loss due to recurrent HCV re-cirrhosis and subsequent hepatic decompensation, which is the predominant cause of death among transplant recipients, reflects the prognostic significance of HCV re-infection. Despite better overall outcome after liver transplantation, the prognosis of HCV-infected patients has not improved during the last two decades. Recent data suggest that increased liver donor age and intensified immunosuppression of transplant patients are the most important contributors to this situation. Other prognostic factors need further confirmation to stratify risk constellations. As HCV cirrhosis has also become the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation, the therapeutic management of HCV re-infection is a central issue of liver transplantation. The antiviral approaches based on interferon (IFN) alpha and ribavirin combinations are still hampered by high toxicity and low efficacy. Sustained viral response rates are still as low as approximately 10-30% and further prospective clinical trials are mandatory to identify the best time point and schedule of antiviral treatment in transplant patients.

Therapeutic management of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C ranges from minimal damage to cirrhosis developing in a few months or years in a substantial proportion of transplant recipients. Different virus, host and donor factors are involved in the pathogenesis of recurrence, but many are poorly understood. Therapeutic strategies can be utilized in the pre-, peri- or posttransplantation setting. Antiviral therapy using interferon and ribavirin and modifying immunosuppression are the main strategies to prevent progression disease. The efficacy of interferon and ribavirin is limited and side effects, reduction/withdrawal are frequent. Current sustained virological response rates are approximately 28%. An optimal immunosuppression regimen has not been established. The choice of calcineurin inhibitors has not clearly been shown to affect histological hepatitis C virus (HCV) but higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids to treat acute rejection is associated with more severe recurrence. The manner in which the doses of immunosuppression are modified has more influence on HCV recurrence than the use of a specific drug per se. Debate about the influence of immunosuppressive regimens on HCV recurrence is ongoing. Potential antifibrotic therapy and new agents targeting HCV infection and replication are emerging and are anticipated to be added to our armentarium in battling recurrent HCV post-LT.

Rejection under alpha interferon therapy in liver transplant recipients

Interferon alpha (IFN) is the corner stone drug for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) in liver transplant (LT) recipients. One of its serious potential adverse effects is acute and chronic rejection. The aim of this study was to review our experience using IFN-based therapy, in order to examine the incidence and the risk factors for rejection, and the outcome of patients who developed rejection. Between September 1990 and December 2004, 70 LT recipients were treated. Patients started antiviral treatment 16 (1-137) months after LT. Histological follow-up was available in all patients according to protocol biopsies. Rejection was diagnosed and graded according to Banff classification. Twenty-one percent of patients developed acute rejection (5 mild, 9 moderate and 1 severe) during IFN-based therapy. Patients were treated for 8 (1-15) months prior to rejection. Previous history of acute rejection before IFN therapy and treatment with pegylated-IFN was significantly associated with rejection (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively). The rejection was successfully treated in 87% of patients. No chronic rejection or graft losses were observed. Acute rejection under IFN-based therapy often occurs in LT recipients, but early diagnosis with protocol biopsies and early treatment can lead to a favorable outcome.

Clinical and histological efficacy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant is controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and histological efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha 2b (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT). We prospectively included 47 liver transplant patients with: 1) a positive test for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-ribonucleic acid (RNA) in serum; 2) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >45 UI/mL; and 3) a liver biopsy showing chronic hepatitis without rejection in the previous 2 months. Patients received PEG-IFN (1.5 microg/kg/week) and ribavirin (800-1,000 mg/day) for 12 months. Follow-up was based on biochemical (ALT), virological (RNA-HCV), and histological (liver biopsy) examinations. Follow-up lasted a minimum of 6 months after the end of antiviral therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 23% of the patients. A total of 33 (70%) patients had normalized ALT levels at the end of therapy. Inflammatory portal and lobular score declined significantly in patients with SVR (P < 0.05) but not in nonresponder patients. Fibrosis did not change significantly in either group. SVR was significantly associated with low gamma-glutamyltransferase GGT (P = 0.04) and HCV-RNA levels (P = 0.03), a virological response at 12 weeks (P = 0.002) and patient's compliance (P = 0.04). Ten (21%) patients were withdrawn prematurely due to adverse effects. In conclusion, Therapy with PEG-IFN and ribavirin achieved SVR and a significant histological improvement in 23% of liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C. Toxicity is an important drawback of this therapy.

Survival of liver transplant patients coinfected with HIV and HCV is adversely impacted by recurrent hepatitis C

Although liver transplantation (LTx) in HIV-positive patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been successful, some have reported poorer outcomes in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Here we discuss the impact of recurrent HCV on 27 HIV-positive patients who underwent LTx. HIV infection was well controlled post-transplantation. Survival in HIV-positive/HCV-positive patients was shorter compared to a cohort of HIV-negative/HCV-positive patients matched in age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and time of transplant, with cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year patient survival of 66.7%, 55.6% and 33.3% versus 75.7%, 71.6% and 71.6%, respectively, although not significantly (p = 0.07), and there was a higher likelihood of developing cirrhosis or dying from an HCV-related complication in coinfected subjects (RR = 2.6, 95% CI, 1.06-6.35; p = 0.03). Risk factors for poor survival included African-American race (p = 0.02), MELD score > 20 (p = 0.05), HAART intolerance postLTx (p = 0.01), and postLTx HCV RNA > 30000000 IU/mL (p = 0.00). Recurrent HCV in 18 patients was associated with eight deaths, including three from fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Among surviving coinfected recipients, five are alive at least 3 years after LTx, and of 15 patients treated with interferon-alpha/ribavirin, six (40%) are HCV RNA negative, including four with sustained virological response. Hepatitis C is a major cause of graft loss and patient mortality in coinfected patients undergoing LTx.

Acute rejection in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients: The great conundrum

1. In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients, treatment of acute rejection is associated with worse outcomes (increased risk of allograft cirrhosis and mortality). 2. Whether patients with HCV are at higher risk for rejection remains controversial. 3. The mechanisms mediating acute rejection and recurrence of HCV are distinct, and as such, it should be possible to develop techniques based on these molecular differences that are diagnostically useful. 4. Liver biopsy is considered the gold-standard for diagnosing acute rejection and recurrent HCV; however, given histopathological similarities between the two conditions, discrimination can be extremely difficult. 5. At the present time, there are no reliable, noninvasive tools available to distinguish between HCV recurrence alone and acute rejection plus HCV recurrence. 6. Mild rejection per se is not associated with graft loss and treatment of rejection with steroids and OKT3 is associated with worse outcome in HCV; thus, it seems logical that we should no longer treat mild rejection.

Hépatite C et transplantation hépatique

Hepatitis C virus-related end-stage liver disease, alone or in combination with alcohol, has become the leading indication for liver transplantation in most transplant programs accounting for approximately half of transplants performed in European centers. Hepatitis C virus infection recurs virtually in every post-transplant patient. The natural history of hepatitis C after liver transplantation is variable. Progression of chronic hepatitis C virus is more aggressive after liver transplantation with a cumulative probability of developing graft cirrhosis estimated to reach 30% at 5 years. Approximately 10% of the patients with recurrent disease will die or require re-transplantation within 5 years post-transplantation. Several factors, including those related to the virus, the host, the environment and the donor, are probably implicated in the outcome. The immune status represents the main significant variable in influencing disease severity in hepatitis C virus-infected patients; with higher HCV viral load and the significant association described between the degree of immunosuppression and disease severity. Interventions to prevent, improve, or halt the recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection have been evaluated by multiple small studies worldwide with similar overall rates of virological clearance of approximately 9-30%. Current consensus recommends combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for those patients with histological recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection and fibrosis. Therapy is adjusted to tolerance and rescued with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin for bone marrow suppression. In this article we present a comprehensive review of post-transplant hepatitis C virus infection; in particular fibrosis progression and the major challenges according to treatment.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of endstage liver disease in Western and Asian countries. However, after liver transplantation, HCV recurs in virtually all patients, and estimated HCV-related graft cirrhosis at 5-year follow-up is 30%. Although immunosuppression accounts for a major part of the accelerated progression of HCV in the transplant population, the best immunosuppression for recipients with HCV that could avoid such complication remains unknown at present. Combination therapy of interferon and ribavirin is thought to be the most effective for the treatment or prophylaxis of HCV infection. However, who should be treated, when treatment should be initiated, and with what agent should patients with HCV infection be treated are still unknown. The current data on HCV recurrence in patients who have received either living- or deceased-donor liver transplantation are controversial, but they are, presumably, similar. Thus, to avoid HCV recurrence in living-donor liver transplantation, we have to take approaches similar to those used for patients receiving deceased-donor liver transplantation. Based on reports from major transplant centers around the world, we consider the best strategy for liver transplantation-related HCV infection is steroid-free immunosuppression and preemptive low-dose interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. Here we describe our experience with living-donor liver transplantion for patients with hepatitis C at Osaka University. There is a need for standardizing the treatment for HCV infection. This can only be achieved through collaborative work between various liver transplant centers worldwide.

The status of liver transplantation for hepatitis C

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects 3% of the world's population, or approximately 170 million people. Most of those acutely infected progress to chronic infection and are unresponsive to existing antiviral treatment. Over a 20-year period, chronic HCV infection leads to cirrhosis and the sequelae of end-stage liver disease, including hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, variceal haemorrhage and hepatocellular carcinoma. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the optimal treatment for decompensated HCV cirrhosis, but is limited by organ availability and universal graft reinfection. This review discusses the results with OLT for HCV from the Dumont-UCLA Liver Transplant Center and discusses future directions in the management of HCV.

Antiviral treatment withdrawal in viremic HCV-positive liver transplant patients: impact on viral loads, allograft function and morphology

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical long-term consequences of antiviral treatment discontinuation in viremic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Twenty-five HCV-positive patients after liver transplantation were included in this study. After diagnosing recurrent hepatitis C, a combination therapy with interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin for a minimum of 12 months was initiated. Viremia levels and allograft function were monitored continuously. Allograft biopsies were performed yearly, analyzing grading of inflammation and staging of fibrosis.

RESULTS

HCV recurrence rate was 100%. Up to 114 months post-transplantation, sustained virological response rate was 64%. Treatment discontinuation in virological nonresponders led subsequently to a significant increase of viral loads and deterioration of allograft function (P<0.05) within 1 month. In three patients, a fibrosing cholestatic syndrome developed, resulting in one patient death. Antiviral retherapy was maintained for a mean of 33 months, leading to a significant decline of aminotransferases (P<0.05) as well as decreasing serum levels of bilirubin and HCV-RNA within 6 months. In addition, development of severe allograft fibrosis was prevented despite persistent viral loads.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that antiviral treatment withdrawal carries the risk of severe disease progression in persistently viremic HCV-positive liver transplant patients.

[Management of hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplantation]

Because of graft reinfection and recurrence of the primary disease in the graft, patients who undergo transplantation due to cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have a poorer long-term prognosis than non-HCV-infected transplant recipients. Apart from antiviral therapy, which can occasionally eradicate HCV infection before transplantation, there are no effective measures to prevent graft reinfection. Pre-transplantation antiviral therapy, however, is of limited applicability with currently available drugs. After liver transplantation, 2 options can be used to prevent graft loss due to HCV progression: early treatment in the first 4-6 weeks when there is still no evidence of histological injury and treatment of established HCV infection. Early antiviral therapy is limited not only by its scarce applicability but also by poor tolerability and limited effectiveness (sustained virological response in approximately 20-30% of patients). Treatment of established HCV infection, especially in patients with evidence of disease progression in biopsy, is the most cost-effective alternative with an efficacy of around 35-45% when pegylated interferon combined with ribavirin is used. Adverse effects, such as cytopenia and even induction of rejection, are the main limitation and lead to premature withdrawal in 30% of patients.

Interferon-based combination anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation: a review and quantitative analysis

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) is universal. However, the efficacy, tolerability and safety of combination interferon and ribavirin (IFN-RIB) or peginterferon and ribavirin (PEG-RIB) anti-viral therapies post-LT are uncertain. We performed a comprehensive search of major medical databases (1980-2005) and conference proceedings (1996-2005). The main outcome measure was sustained virological response (SVR, undetectable HCV RNA) at 6 months. Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Twenty-seven IFN-RIB and 21 PEG-RIB studies were included. IFN-RIB was associated with a pooled SVR rate of 24% (95% CI, 20-27%), while PEG-RIB was associated with an SVR rate of 27% (23-31%). Pooled discontinuation rates were 24% (21-27%) with IFN-RIB and 26% (20-32%) with PEG-RIB. The pooled rate of acute graft rejection was 2% (1-3%) with IFN-RIB and 5% (3-7%) with PEG-RIB. IFN-RIB and PEG-RIB therapies in HCV infection post-LT were associated with similar but overall low SVR and were poorly tolerated. The rate of acute rejection was small. The therapeutic advantage of PEG-RIB therapy observed in non-transplant chronic HCV infection appears to be attenuated post-LT. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate reasons for this post-transplant therapeutic disadvantage and to find strategies to ameliorate them.

Management of hepatitis C in the setting of liver transplantation

Each year, 5000 to 6000 liver transplantations are performed in the United States, 40% of which are for hepatitis C-related end-stage liver disease. Infection of liver allograft is universal and is associated with an accelerated rate of disease progression. Unfortunately, antiviral therapy after transplantation is less effective and often is beset with complications. This article reviews antiviral therapies and the factors that may influence the response in patients who have HCV infection both immediately before and after liver transplantation.

Aspects of hepatitis C virus infection relating to liver transplantation

End-stage liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major indication for liver transplantation. HCV re-infection after transplantation is almost constant, and recent data confirm that it significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Factors that may influence disease severity and consequent progression of HCV graft injury remain unclear. Chronic HCV infection develops in 75-90% of patients, and 5-30% ultimately progress to cirrhosis within 5 years. Pre-transplantation antiviral treatment is not easily related to poor tolerance. Attempts to administer prophylactic post-transplantation antiviral treatment are under evaluation but are limited by the side-effects of antiviral drugs. Treatment of established graft lesions with interferon or ribavirin as single agents has been disappointing. Combination therapy gave promising results, with sustained virological response in 25-35% of patients, but indications, modality and duration of treatment should be assessed.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus related liver disease

Liver transplantation is a useful treatment for end stage liver disease of all aetiologies but recurrent disease presents an ongoing challenge, particularly for hepatitis C virus (HCV) where recurrence is almost universal. Immunosuppression is needed for all patients after transplantation and should be tailored to the individual patient, with particular problems being noted for those with HCV. The longer term effects of immunosuppression, particularly renal failure and the adverse effects of certain treatments on the liver graft, have become more important as survival improves and results are studied for longer periods after transplantation.

Treatment of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

This article summarizes the current therapies, with particular emphasis on antiviral therapy. Because these alternatives have substantial limitations, pretransplant or early post-transplant recognition of patients with high risk of severe post-transplantation outcome is desirable to target these patients for intervention. Alternatively, the implementation of measures aimed at reducing or avoiding factors known to be associated with an aggressive recurrence is an additional strategy that needs to be explored.

Recurrence of hepatitis C infection: Where are we now?

1. Hepatitis C-associated liver failure is the most common indication for liver transplantation, and approximately 10% of HCV-infected recipients will die or lose their allograft secondary to recurrent HCV infection. 2. Risk factors associated with histological recurrence of HCV include donor (age, fat content, ischemic time, and living donor), recipient (age and non-Caucasian race), clinical (rejection and CMV), and viral (viral load and quasispecies). 3. Treatment of recipients with histological recurrence is with pegylated IFN (+/- ribavirin). The role of hepatitis C immunoglobulin in the management of postransplant HCV is still evolving. (

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine on early recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on incidence, delay, severity and clinical course of early recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT). A total of 21 hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients after LT were prospectively enrolled in this study. All of them received a quadruple induction cyclosporine A (CsA)-based immunosuppression, augmented by MMF (n=12) or by azathioprine (n=9, AZA). MMF tended to delay recurrent disease (50+/-35 versus 35+/-35 weeks, P=0.5) with significantly lower levels of aminotransferases (P<0.05). Furthermore, patients under MMF revealed less severe allograft fibrosis at disease recurrence (stage of fibrosis: 1.5+/-0.5 versus 2.2+/-1.2; P=0.07). But stage of fibrosis significantly increased in the MMF-group (P<0.05) during 6 months of antiviral treatment. Three patients in the MMF-group and none of the controls suffered from severe fibrosing cholestatic recurrent hepatitis C. Initial post-LT administration of MMF tended to delay recurrent hepatitis C and to limit initial HCV-related biochemical and morphological graft dysfunction. But during clinical follow-up, its immunosuppressive capabilities exceeded possible antiviral properties, finally leading to significant progression of graft fibrosis. Thus, concomitant dose reduction of other basic immunosuppressants might be useful in this clinical setting.

Successful treatment of hepatitis C reinfection with interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a virtually universal occurrence, and a significant proportion of patients develop chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of interferon (IFN)-alpha2b plus ribavirin (RIBA) in the treatment of recurrent HCV after OLT over the long term.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with recurrent HCV infection (positive serum HCV RNA, elevated serum aminotransferases, histological activity) were started on IFN-alpha2b (3-6 million units administered subcutaneously three times a week) plus RIBA (800-1200 mg/day) 18+/-5 months after OLT. HCV RNA was determined 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months after initiation of treatment. Liver biopsy was performed before and after therapy. The patients were followed up for a mean of 33+/-5 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (87%) were treated for at least 6 months and nine patients (60%) for 12 months. After 3 months, 11 patients (73%) were free from HCV RNA (<50 copies/ml); the virological end-of-treatment response was 67%. Five patients (33%) remained HCV RNA-negative 6 months posttreatment (sustained response (SR)). During the follow-up period, four patients (27%) died of liver failure, recurrent HCV after virological response, or HCC. The histological activity index improved significantly for both inflammatory activity and fibrosis, from 8.8 to 4.7 and from 7.3 to 4.8, respectively. In none of the patients were signs of rejection observed.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with IFN and RIBA in transplanted patients with chronic hepatitis C is an effective treatment that results in a high virological SR rate. It is well tolerated and leads to an improvement in histological outcome.

Combined treatment with pegylated interferon (alpha-2b) and ribavirin in the acute phase of hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The efficacy and safety of treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2b (Peg-Intron, 1.5 microg/kg) and ribavirin (400-800 mg) in the acute phase of recurrent HCV after LT is presented.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (17 men) transplanted for HCV-associated cirrhosis (genotype 1b) were treated for at least 6 months and compared with 24 consecutive transplant patients (16 men) without antiviral therapy (controls).

RESULTS

At completion of treatment, 14/24 treated patients (58%) achieved HCV-RNA negativity, compared to none of controls (P<0.0001). Sustained virological response (SVR) occurred in 8/23 treated patients (34.7%) who reached week 24 after treatment and none of controls (P<0.005). At 12 weeks after treatment, 15/24 patients (62.5%) had an early virological response (EVR) (seven tested HCV-RNA negative). SVR was associated with absence of corticosteroid bolus administration (P=0.01), presence of EVR (P=0.002) and absence of cytomegalovirus infection (P=0.001). Haematological adverse effects included anaemia, 17/24 cases (71%) and leukopenia, 23/24 cases (96%). One patient presented mild acute rejection that resolved by adjusting immunosuppressive dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the acute phase of HCV reinfection yielded an EVR of 62.5% and a SVR of 34.7%. The combination was safe, with a low rate of therapy withdrawal.

Role of growth factors in the treatment of patients with HIV/HCV coinfection and patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C (HCV) contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality of patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and those with recurrent hepatitis C after successful liver transplantation. Treatment of hepatitis C in these patient populations, while crucial, can be quite challenging. Baseline cytopenias, in particular, may limit dosing of interferon and/or ribavirin or preclude therapy entirely when standard guidelines are followed. Concomitant medications, opportunistic infections, and other bone marrow insults account for the anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia frequently encountered in these patients. Sustained virologic response rates in published series for HIV/HCV and post-transplantation HCV have not reached those seen in treatment of HCV alone, despite the highly selected patient populations chosen for these studies. Hematopoietic growth factors such as erythropoietin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors may be used to improve the anemia and neutropenia seen during treatment of HCV. Reported experience with these growth factors is limited in HIV/HCV coinfected patients, but studies are underway to determine if growth factors improve adherence to therapy and perhaps virologic response rates. Post-transplantation studies of HCV therapy have reported more liberal use of growth factors; however, discontinuation rates have been high and virologic response rates have been disappointing. Further study of growth factors as a means to increase sustained virologic response rates and maintain adequate dosing and duration of interferon and ribavirin therapy in these patient populations is needed.

Treatment of hepatitis B and C after liver transplantation. Part 2, hepatitis C

End-stage liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus is a major indication for liver transplantation. However, recurrence of hepatitis in the graft is a major issue. HCV re-infection after transplantation is almost constant, and recent data confirm that it significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Factors that may influence disease severity and consequent progression of HCV graft injury remain unclear. Chronic HCV infection develops in 60%-80% of patients, and 6%-28% ultimately progress to cirrhosis within 5 years. Pre-transplantation antiviral treatment is not easily related to poor tolerance. Attempts to administer prophylactic post-transplantation antiviral treatment are under evaluation but are limited by antiviral drug side effects. Treatment of established graft lesions with interferon or ribavirin as single agents has been disappointing. Combination therapy gave promising results, with sustained virological response in 25% of patients, but indications, modality and duration of treatment should be assessed.

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) secondary to hepatitis viruses has evolved rapidly during the last two decades. ESLD secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) accounts for approximately 50% of LT in the United States and Europe. Despite the decrease in the number of new HCV infections, the prevalence of advanced HCV-related liver disease is steadily increasing. In light of the near universal recurrence of posttransplantation HCV infection and our limited ability to treat recurrent disease, transplantation is in danger of being overrun by viral hepatitis, unless effective strategies can be used to treat disease, expand the donor pool of available organs, and prevent disease recurrence. In the early 1980s, results of LT for chronic hepatitis B virus infection were hampered by recurrent infection and subsequent allograft failure. However, with the introduction of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and treatment with potent nucleoside analogs, there has been a resurgence of LT for hepatitis B virus-related ESLD. Despite the wide acceptance of LT as a therapy for ESLD, there is little consensus on the appropriate immunosuppressive regimens, and prophylactic and therapeutic treatments vary widely from one center to another. This review summarizes available data and highlights appropriate strategies to improve outcomes.

Recurrent hepatitis C genotype 1b following liver transplantation: treatment with combination interferon-ribavirin therapy

BACKGROUND

Recurrent hepatitis C is very common leading to graft cirrhosis in a significant proportion of patients. Preliminary reports of combination therapy with interferon-ribavirin have been promising but generally applied to selected patients with chronic mild disease. Little is known, however, about the efficacy and risk of adverse effects when it is used in general clinical practice.

AIMS

To analyse the efficacy (biochemical, virological and histological response) and tolerance of combination therapy in patients with recurrent hepatitis C genotype 1b.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (mean age 54 years; range 37-67 years; 75% male) with recurrent hepatitis C virus (histology at baseline: acute hepatitis (n = 3); chronic hepatitis (n = 21) with F3 or 4 in 77%) were treated with 12 months interferon (1.5-3 MU thrice weekly) + ribavirin (600-1200 mg daily) followed by 6 months ribavirin (58%), at a median of 427 days (56-2812) after transplantation.

RESULTS

Seven patients (29%) discontinued therapy due to side effects, mainly anaemia, at a median of 3 months since initiation. Dose modifications were required in 88% of those completing the whole course of therapy. Overall, the sustained virological and biochemical response was 12.5%. This rate was slightly higher (18%) if only the 17 patients who finished the whole course of therapy were analysed. Histological improvement was achieved in 31.5% of treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy has a very limited efficacy in the liver transplant setting, although some benefit may be achieved, even in those with advanced graft fibrosis. Tolerance, however, remains a matter of concern.

Two-dose Daclizumab Induction Therapy in 209 Liver Transplants: A Single-Center Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patient and graft survival after liver transplantation are adversely affected by early posttransplant renal dysfunction. Therefore, our immunosuppressive strategies should be as "renal sparing" as possible. This is the largest published series to date using daclizumab induction therapy in a renal-sparing regimen.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, nonrandomized study comparing 209 adult liver transplants with daclizumab induction to 115 transplants with no induction.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival were similar, despite higher pretransplant acuity of illness and older age in the induction group. Acute rejection within the first 6 months occurred less commonly in the induction group (25.4% vs. 39.1%, P=0.01), despite significantly delayed initiation and lower doses of a calcineurin inhibitor. Mycophenolate mofetil was used more commonly in induction patients, but the efficacy of daclizumab in preventing rejection was independent of this. Patients with a pretransplant creatinine concentration 1.5 mg/dL or less had less rejection if they received induction. Renal function worsened in noninduction patients but showed sustained improvement throughout follow-up in induction patients with a pretransplant creatinine concentration greater than 1.5 mg/dL. Induction therapy provided better rejection prophylaxis among those requiring temporary calcineurin inhibitor cessation because of renal dysfunction. The incidences of histologic hepatitis C recurrence and cytomegalovirus infection were similar in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver recipients with and without pretransplant renal dysfunction have less acute rejection with daclizumab induction therapy. This is not associated with an increased risk of over-immunosuppression. Sustained renal improvement in recipients with pretransplant renal dysfunction is possible with daclizumab induction.

Hepatitis C virus antiviral therapy in patients with cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is generally a slowly progressive disease. A minority of infected patients, however, eventually will develop cirrhosis and its life-threatening complications.Recent development of combination interferon (IFN) and ribavirin(RBV) antiviral therapy has changed the approach to patients infected with the virus. Once cirrhosis develops, treatment is a difficult task and should be done with close monitoring because of numerous adverse effects. In patients with compensated cirrhosis,combination therapy is the most efficient approach and offers the highest sustained virological response. Although data are limited,no significant differences have been reported between the use of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and standard IFN in combination with RBV. Moreover, PEG-IFN has a higher risk of hematological complications, and this should be considered when using in advanced disease. Antiviral therapy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis should be used only in a clinical trial setting because of reported severe adverse effects. After liver transplantation, combination therapy may be an alternative for a limited number of patients. Although definitive recommendations cannot be made because of limited studies, there is a group of very well compensated patients with HCV and cirrhosis who benefited from treatment by clinicians well versed in the use of combination therapy.

Pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the treatment of post-liver transplant recurrent hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Histological recurrence of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) occurs in the majority of persons transplanted for cirrhosis as a result of HCV. Herein we analyze our experience with the use of both conventional and pegylated (PEG) interferon (IFN) in combination with ribavirin (RBV) in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV.

METHODS

Patients transplanted between 1992 and 2001 with post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) histological recurrence of HCV, and who were treated with at least 6 months of IFN or PEG-IFN in combination with RBV were included in this analysis. A retrospective chart review was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were included. Fifteen were treated with IFN/RBV and 16 with PEG-IFN/RBV. Of these 16, 11 had been begun on IFN/RBV and were changed to PEG-IFN/RBV because of persistent viremia. Three patients (20%) in the IFN/RBV group and six patients (37.5%) in the PEG-IFN/RBV group experienced a virologic response (VR) on therapy. Of the six patients experiencing VR in the PEG-IFN/RBV group, three (50%) were IFN/RBV non-responders. There were two sustained VRs (SVR). The 65.6% of all patients experienced a biochemical response (BR) on therapy. Seven deaths were observed. Dose modifications of IFN or PEG-IFN (87.1%) and RBV (80.6%) and the requirement for hematopoietic growth factors were frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of recurrent HCV infection with combination of IFN or PEG-IFN and RBV produced an on-therapy VR in 29% and BR in 65% of patients. Hematologic toxicity and dose modifications were frequent. Our experience with antiviral therapy for HCV post-OLT remains disappointing but PEG-IFN + RBV appears to produce VR in a sizable portion of IFN + RBV non-responders.