Chemokines and allograft rejection: narrowing the list of suspects

Solid Organ Transplantation in HIV-Infected Recipients: History, Progress, and Frontiers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

End-stage organ disease prevalence is increasing among HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals. Trial and registry data confirm that solid organ transplantation (SOT) is efficacious in this population. Optimizing access to transplant and decreasing complications represent active frontiers.

RECENT FINDINGS

HIV+ recipients historically experienced 2-4-fold higher rejection. Integrase strand transferase inhibitors (INSTIs) minimize drug interactions and may reduce rejection along with lymphodepleting induction immunosuppression. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection has been associated with inferior outcomes, yet direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) may mitigate this. Experience in South Africa and the US HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act support HIV+ donor to HIV+ recipient (HIV D+/R+) transplantation. SOT is the optimal treatment for end-stage organ disease in HIV+ individuals. Recent advances include use of INSTIs and DAAs in transplant recipients; however, strategies to improve access to transplant are needed. HIV D+/R+ transplantation is under investigation and may improve access and provide insights for HIV cure and pathogenesis research.

Mechanisms and mediators of inflammation: potential models for skin rejection and targeted therapy in vascularized composite allotransplantation

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is an effective treatment option for patients suffering from limb loss or severe disfigurement. However, postoperative courses of VCA recipients have been complicated by skin rejection, and long-term immunosuppression remains a necessity for allograft survival. To widen the scope of this quality-of-life improving procedure minimization of immunosuppression in order to limit risks and side effects is needed. In some aspects, the molecular mechanisms and dynamics of skin allograft rejection seem similar to inflammatory skin conditions. T cells are key players in skin rejection and are recruited to the skin via activation of adhesion molecules, cytokines, and chemokines. Blocking these molecules has not only shown success in the treatment of inflammatory dermatoses, but also prolonged graft survival in various models of solid organ transplantation. In addition to T cell recruitment, ectopic lymphoid structures within the allograft associated with chronic rejection in solid organ transplantation might contribute to the strong alloimmune response towards the skin. Selectively targeting the molecules involved offers exciting novel therapeutic options in the prevention and treatment of skin rejection after VCA.

Viral macrophage inflammatory protein-II improves acute rejection in allogeneic rat kidney transplants

Purpose

During rejection, leukocytes are recruited from the peripheral circulation into the graft leading to the damage of endothelial cells, capillary perfusion failure and graft loss. Chemokines play a pivotal role in the recruitment of leukocytes to the endothelium. Viral macrophage inflammatory protein-II (vMIP-II), a human herpes virus-8 DNA-encoded protein, is a broad-spectrum chemokine antagonist. The aim of the study was to prove the beneficial activity of vMIP-II treatment on acute rat kidney allograft damage.

Methods

Heterotopic rat kidney transplantation was performed in the Fischer 344 to Lewis transplantation model and animals were treated with vMIP-II (2 × 15 µg or 100 µg/day) for 7 days. Rejection-induced damage was analyzed by histology, and microcirculatory changes within the graft were analyzed by in vivo microscopy.

Results

Viral macrophage inflammatory protein-II significantly improved acute glomerular damage and tubulointerstitial inflammation and lowered the extent of vascular and tubulointerstitial damage of the treated allografts. Functional microcirculation of peritubular capillaries was significantly improved in vivo, and the firm adherence of leukocytes was significantly reduced by vMIP-II treatment.

Conclusions

The administration of the broad-spectrum antagonist vMIP-II improved acute renal allograft damage, mainly by a reduction in leukocyte recruitment with a subsequently improved renal cortical microcirculation in vivo.

Islet transplantation in patients with diabetes mellitus: choice of immunosuppression

Islet transplantation offers patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus freedom from long-term insulin therapy and a degree of metabolic control that is far superior to injected insulin. The hope is that near-perfect glucose control sustained over time will prevent progression of secondary diabetic complications. The selection of optimal immunosuppressive agents for islet transplantation has been a formidable challenge, given the need to overcome both autoimmune and alloimmune barriers, as well as the potential toxicity of immunosuppressive agents on transplanted islets. Early strategies relied on protocols that had proven success in solid organ transplantation and consisted of azathioprine, cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Under these protocols, fewer than 10% of patients were able to achieve insulin independence. The development of the 'Edmonton Protocol' dramatically transformed clinical outcomes in islet transplantation in recent years through the introduction of a more potent, less diabetogenic, and corticosteroid-free immunosuppressive regimen consisting of sirolimus, low-dose tacrolimus, and induction anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody. While insulin independence rates under this protocol have been highly successful, patients must be maintained on lifelong immunosuppression. While the risk of malignancy, post-transplant lymphoma and sepsis have been low and diminishing in transplanted patients to date, fears of these complications and a host of drug-related adverse effects have precluded broader application. Patients undergoing islet transplantation today must exchange insulin for chronic immunosuppressive therapy, and therefore the procedure can only be justified in patients with very unstable forms of diabetes, or in those with another solid organ allograft who already endure the risks of immunosuppression. Advances in more specific and less toxic immunosuppressive agents together with progress in better understanding the biology of diabetes will lead to more suitable strategies to control both alloimmune and recurrent autoimmune reactions. These protocols, ultimately aimed at establishing tolerance, are an essential pre-requisite to move towards providing islet transplantation earlier in the course of the disease, including transplantation in children. This review addresses the evolution of immunosuppressive strategies in islet transplantation, and highlights some novel agents in pre-clinical development or in early clinical trials that may offer considerable promise in facilitating the induction of tolerance.

Chemokines and chemokine receptors in leukocyte trafficking

Chemokines regulate inflammation, leukocyte trafficking, and immune cell differentiation. The role of chemokines in homing of naive T lymphocytes to secondary lymphatic organs is probably the best understood of these processes, and information on chemokines in inflammation, asthma, and neurological diseases is rapidly increasing. Over the past 15 years, understanding of the size and functional complexity of the chemokine family of peptide chemoattractants has grown substantially. In this review, we first present information regarding the structure, expression, and signaling properties of chemokines and their receptors. The second part is a systems physiology-based overview of the roles that chemokines play in tissue-specific homing of lymphocyte subsets and in trafficking of inflammatory cells. This review draws on recent experimental findings as well as current models proposed by experts in the chemokine field.